Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D: Fill & Download for Free

No, not at all.Note however that it is just not reasonable to represent the NYT as neutral. For practical purposes they are a Democratic party publication. Note that they have not endorsed a Republican presidential candidate since 1956 (64 years ago as of this writing).List of United States presidential election endorsements made by The New York Times - WikipediaSince its founding in 1851, The New York Timeshas endorsed a candidate for president of the United States for all but two presidential elections (1852 and 1856) in the paper's history. The first endorsement was in 1860 for Abraham Lincolnand the most recent one was for Hillary Clinton in 2016. Its first six endorsements were for Republicans, and it was not until 1884 that it backed its first Democrat, Grover Cleveland. Since then it has endorsed the Democratic candidate 26 times, the Republican six times (the last being Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956), and a third-party candidate once (in 1896).On to Ms Harris,Political positions of Kamala Harris - WikipediaSome examples where she is an over the top extreamist.Gun LawsHarris earned an "F" rating from the National Rifle Association for her consistent efforts supporting gun control.[41]While serving as district attorney in San Francisco Harris, along with other district attorneys, filed an amicus brief in District of Columbia v. Heller arguing that the Washington, D.C. gun law at issue did not violate the Second Amendment.[42]That is an extremist position in the USA, not even slightly moderate.ImmigrationHarris has expressed support for San Francisco's sanctuary city policy of not inquiring about immigration status in the process of a criminal investigation.[50]“Sanctuary city” is an code word for extremist position for ignoring federal immigration law.What I would call freedom of speech, what leftists term.Internet privacy and net neutralityIn September 2017, Harris was one of nine senators to sign a letter to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Paithat charged the FCC with failing "to provide stakeholders with an opportunity to comment on the tens of thousands of filed complaints that directly shed light on proposed changeAgain this is an extremist position, “net neutrality” is a code term for censorship of speech leftists do not approve of.Economic freedomConsumer protectionOn April 10, 2020, Harris and Senator Elizabeth Warren introduced the Price Gouging Prevention Act, a bill that would empower the Federal Trade Commission to enforce a ban on excessive price increases of consumer goods amid national emergencies and specifically consider any price increase above 10% to be price gouging during such a declaration.[99]Price gouging is a code term for a way to punish people you politically disapprove. Again this is an extremist left-wing position.Energy and environmentDuring her time as San Francisco District Attorney, Harris created the Environmental Justice Unit in the San Francisco District Attorney's Office[101] and prosecuted several industries and individuals for pollution, most notably U-Haul, Alameda Publishing Corporation, and the Cosco Busan oil spill. She also advocated for strong enforcement of environmental protection laws.[102]In October 2017, Harris was one of nineteen senators to sign a letter to Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency Scott Pruittquestioning Pruitt's decision to repeal the Clean Power Plan, asserting that the repeal's proposal used "mathematical sleights of hand to over-state the costs of industry compliance with the 2015 Rule and understate the benefits that will be lost if the 2017 repeal is finalized" and science denying and math fabricating would fail to "satisfy the requirements of the law, nor will it slow the increase in frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, the inexorable rise in sea levels, or the other dire effects of global warming that our planet is already experiencing."Please — this full on eco-freak position is not, and cannot be called “moderate”.Biden VP Pick Harris Backed Minnesota Bail Fund that Let Violent Rioters Walk Free - Headline USASen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., who was picked to be Joe Biden’s running mate, backed an activist group that bailed out violent rioters and criminals, including an alleged murderer and a previously convicted rapist during recent race riots.The group, Minnesota Freedom Fund, bailed out multiple criminals, including Darnika Floyd, who allegedly stabbed a friend to death; and Christopher Boswell, who is facing charges for sexual assault and kidnapping, according to Fox 9.Both criminals received hundreds of thousands of dollars in bail money from MFF. The group put up $100,000 on Floyd’s behalf, and $350,000 on Boswell’s behalf.MFF also bailed out Jaleel Stallings, who allegedly shot at police during the May riots, and Donovan Boone, who was charged with invading the home of his ex-girlfriend and choking her. Stallings was bailed out for $75,000 and Boone was bailed out for $3,000.Moderate? — Pragmatic ? — no not hardly.

From epa website-Citation:Hill, R. DEFINITION OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., EPA/600/D-86/018 (NTIS PB86147535), 1986.Description:The USEPA has promulagated regulation establishing the criteria and characteristics of hazardous waste. The criteria established include the following factors: (1) the waste is associated with an identified waste stream or contains constituents which are identified in listings in the federal register (2) the waste exhibits characteristics of hazardous waste as identified by a series of analytical tests (3) the wastes are designated at Acute Hazardous Waste by toxicity tests. The analytical tests relate to ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity and extraction procedure test. The toxicity tests relate to oral and dermal LD 50 tests. The European Economic Community (EEC) countries have established a list of Toxic and Dangerous Waste but each EEC country has a different interpretation of the definition of these wastes. The USEPA has also developed a manifest system which is required for tracking the transportation of hazardous waste from the generator, through processing to the ultimate disposal.

The EPA has been to a large degree gutted in the two years trump has been in power. Corporate representatives have been dictating the gutting. It is a dangerous precedent.EWG: Agency Is ‘Cooking the Books’ To Keep Dangerous Chemicals in UseContact:Alex Formuzis(202) [email protected] IMMEDIATE RELEASE:FRIDAY, JANUARY 18, 2019WASHINGTON – Concern among members of Congress over the Trump administration’s implementation of the updated federal chemicals law burst across the aisle this week, with both the top Republican and Democrat on a key House environment subcommittee calling for oversight hearings.Rep. Paul Tonko, D-N.Y., chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on the Environment and Climate Change, and Rep. John Shimkus, R-Ill., the ranking Republican on the panel, plan to hold an oversight hearing to get answers from the Environmental Protection Agency about how it’s executing the agency’s beefed-up authority to protect the public from toxic chemicals.Anthony Adragna of Politico Pro reported this week that Tonko and Shimkus are eager to get answers from the EPA about how it is protecting public health from dangerous chemicals.“The spirit and letter of those reforms should be implemented to the nth degree,” Tonko said. “I agree with former Chairman Shimkus that we need to do oversight and we need to revisit how it's being implemented.”“I think now it’s time to have an oversight hearing to see where they’re at and get some real numbers,” Shimkus said. “How many new chemicals do we have and how many do we have a decision on.”“We applaud this bipartisan call for oversight,” said EWG Senior Vice President for Government Affairs Scott Faber. “There is ample evidence showing that the Trump EPA is cooking the books to allow some of the most hazardous chemicals in existence to remain in use, putting millions of people at further risk of exposure.”In 2016, Congress passed and President Obama signed into law the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act, which amended the woefully weak Toxic Substances Control Act. The new law gives the EPA power to finally ban asbestos and other dangerous chemicals.Since the Trump administration came to power, a number of troubling decisions by former EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt and current Acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler show an agency bending both the spirit and letter of the new chemicals law to benefit the chemical industry.Among the most egregious actions is the EPA’s decision to ignore the many ways that people are exposed to chemicals that put vulnerable populations, such as young children and communities near factories, at even greater risk.The new law requires the EPA to consider all uses of a chemical when evaluating it for safety. Despite this clear directive, Wheeler is ignoring key exposures to asbestos in the agency’s safety assessment, likely in violation of the law.Wheeler appears to be laying the groundwork for the agency to find that asbestos is safe and should remain legal. Other chemicals the EPA is dragging its feet to restrict or ban include the lethal paint-stripping chemical methylene chloride and the notorious industrial solvent trichloroethylene, or TCE.Under the Trump administration, the EPA is retreating from an earlier proposal to ban key uses of TCE, and it is excluding water, air and soil pollution from a safety assessment under the new chemicals law.“The mission of the EPA is to protect human health and the environment, not the profits of the chemical industry,” Faber added. “There are a lot of questions about how the EPA is implementing the chemicals law, and Chairman Tonko and Ranking Member Shimkus deserve answers on behalf of all Americans.”###The Environmental Working Group is a nonprofit, non-partisan organization that empowers people to live healthier lives in a healthier environment. Through research, advocacy and unique education tools, EWG drives consumer choice and civic action.Regulatory Rollbacks | Environmental Integritywww.environmentalintegrity.org › Trump Watch: EPAThe Trump Administration is rolling back a wide variety of regulations that ... and lakes that provide drinking water for millions of people, and because they act as ... currently suing Trump's EPA to ensure the 2015 rule's provisions provide the ...The Environmental Protection Agency in the Early Trump ... - NCBI - NIHhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5922212/by L Dillon - ‎2018 - ‎Cited by 2 - ‎Related articlesEDGI formed after the US elections in November 2016 to document, research, and ... The Trumpadministration has explicitly sought to reorient the EPA toward ...Trump's pick for EPA already rolling back climate change protections ...https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/03/politics/epa-wheeler-climate.../index.htmlDec 3, 2018 - Andrew Wheeler, the former coal lobbyist who is now acting administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, was a "driving force" behind ...With a shrinking EPA, Trump delivers on his promise to cut ...https://www.washingtonpost.com/...epa-trump.../6b058f9e-b143-11e8-a20b-5f4f84429...Sep 8, 2018 - The trend has continued even after a major round of buyouts last year and despite the fact that the EPA's budget has remained stable.