Discussion Guide For Employers Labor Leaders And: Fill & Download for Free

This question is extremely timely as my team and I were having a massive internal conversation regarding how we were going to price a product that we were launching into the market. Hopefully, you will find the discourse helpful in understanding how we employ psychology, brand strategy, and experience into position this new brand into the marketplaceNames have been changed to illustrate the point of the psychology rather than the company, product, or other identifying information.[NOTE: I probably should have told you readers what the bloody product is]Product:- The product that we were analyzing the pricing strategy for was a high-end women's heel cover (specially designed for Louboutin, Manolo, Jimmy Choo, etc)- The Product utilizes a waterproof fabric with a rubber sole for traction- The Product slips over a premium pair of heels and enables the young lady to brilliantly traverse inclement weather (Rain & Snow).- The Product is unzipped and slipped off when she arrives at her destination ready to shine.Problem:GCD has secured two materials that have very different price points. The original theory is that GCD should employ two price points (High Price & Low Price) within the GCD launch collection to gain market insight about the best fit for the positioning of the product in the marketplace. The problem is that we need to understand if this is the best approach for defining the corporate strategy.Goal:Define a logic framework that supports a rationale behind a pricing strategy.Summary:The nature of the cover shoe is a utility good, whose goal is to protect the wearer & deliver her to the destination ready to shine. The product performs a service out of necessity that enables a larger goal of wearing stunning heels while social peers are forced into less-desirable secondary options like Boots. Therefore, neither of the factors serve to address a rationale for differentiated pricing as neither products aids / augments either the product goal or the consumption goal any better than the other.In addition, when you get into Quality / Price comparison between highly congruent products (ie Black Covers in 2 prices) , the value proposition of the high quality is undermined by the pricing considerations of the low price. The buyer creates an intrinsic expectation that is unable to be fulfilled by GCD - I want the High Quality in the Low price.Finally, we see that the psychology of the purchasing consumer will be largely driven by aspirational consumers. Thus the brand of the heel is what the consumer is looking to showcase for social presence and serves as the driving factor for the purchase. Thus if the consumer is already reaching then a two tier pricing structure will drive the consumer to focus solely on cost when evaluating the use of this good - Thereby undermining the High Price for the Low Price.There are three main points that I would like to address the pricing considerations for a dual priced line:1. Utility Goods Inherent Quality WeaknessA) Use Case for Tiered Pricing & Why This is Not Applicable for GCDB) GCD is a Supporting Player2. Reactionary Strategy Inhibits Leadership & Long Term ValueA) Conflicting Goals of the Main LeadershipB) Risks of Dual Prices as a Means of Experimentation3. Quality/Price Dissonance Dichotomy4. Luxury Consumer Psychology5. Market Comparables to Drive Pricing Logic1. Utility Goods Inherent Pricing WeaknessThe product is a utility good that serves a functional purpose. This is not like a Burberry Scarf that aesthetically & functionally accessorizes a Burberry trench coat - this is a product that has a necessary function or utility to the consumer. When differentiating pricing for utility goods - there needs to be a driving factor in the performance to differentiate the price. For example, some questions the consumer maybe asking:Will paying for the higher priced item offer an additional benefits?Will paying more serve to augment the social cues for my status (i.e. the Burberry Scarf & Coat example)?Use Case for Tiered Pricing & Why This is Not Applicable for GCD:When employing a tiered pricing structure, you need to establish clear factors that communicate to the customer WHY this tier warrants greater pricing. Let’s take a look at a traditional pricing tier.SilverFeature 1Feature 2Feature 3GoldAll of Silver Package PLUSFeature 4Feature 5Feature 6PlatinumAll of Gold PLUSFeature 7Feature 8In this example, you can clearly see how much better Silver is from Gold & Platinum from Gold. We have definable metrics that serve to sell the consumer as to why one should cost more and the value of what you will get. In contrast, when it comes to this product, there are no clearly definable differentiating factors for Price 1 versus Price 2 - the product performs the same regardless of the price. For Example,Purpose (Utility): Protect Expensive Heels from Rain / Snow / Puddles / etcPrice 1: $80.00Price 2: $125.00How does the additional $45.00 drive more value to the consumer in achieving the goal of protecting the heel of the wearer? The answer is that it does not protect against any additional items that will inform a rationale to pay more.The Quality argument is inherently weak as the quality of the item does NOTHING to support the goal of the product’s utilization.GCD Role is to Alley-oop the Main StarThe vast majority of luxury consumption is done for the perceived social status inferred by the wearer. Women maybe purchasing for the fit, but it is probably more likely that they are competing with the female peers for dominance of the social group. Some of these heels are extremely expensive and uncomfortable, but they make the wearer look great - thus are worn to be seen by the social network as the leader for whatever reason. Therefore, the cover shoe is not the main attraction, it is the means to deliver enable the wearer to arrive at a function to be ready to shine (i.e. in great heels that make the wear look and feel sexy - while her social peers are in boots or something drab).GCD needs to be assisting in this mission of delivering the wearer ready to shine by having a great product that protects the consumer. In addition, this yields a basis for saying that the cover shoe is not the main attraction, it’s job is to alley-oop the showcasing of the heel. Therefore, the product should be easy to use and we should be cognizant that the wearer will want to take them off as soon as the utility of the product is performed to deliver the real goal of wearing a bad ass pair of heels.Thus if the goal is to use them and get out of them quickly, there is nothing about that mission that paying a higher price will support. Therefore we should eliminate the two positions all together.2. Reactionary Strategy Inhibits Leadership & Long Term ValueOne main arguments for employing a dual pricing strategy during the initial launch is that this will enable GCD to have feedback from the marketplace based on the product’s performance with buyers. The nature of the sales cycle for GCD involves selling GCD products at fashion trade shows to buyers, whose job is to purchase product from vendors (eg GCD) for retail in the retail environments that they represent. Let’s illustrate the sales cycle in more detail to establish an even footing for purposes of further investigation:1. GCD Exhibits Product at Trade Shows2. Buyers Attend the Trade Shows to Purchase Inventory for Sale3. GCD Totals Orders and Goals into Production4. Production Finished & Shipped to Retail5. Retail Consumers Start PurchasingOverall Timeline to Market Feedback: 7 - 8 MonthsThe general theory is that a buyer (the agent of the retailer) has the performance information regarding existing product purchases and experience to select the products that will compromise the strongest performance for the retailer. The retailer is financially liable for the purchasing decisions of the buyer and therefore the purchasing decisions of the buyer has considerable risks to the retailer.By virtue of the buyer serving as a representative of the future customers (i.e. the buyer has product performance information that informs how products perform with their clients), a dual pricing strategy is relying on the representative (of the consumers) to make decisions about the future of GCD. The buyers can have good insight, but it should be a factor that is incorporated into the overall positioning within the marketplace. However, we must always take into account that there are three factors that can serve to degrade the quality of this a strategic medium:1. The allegiance of the buyer is to maximize profit for the retailer (not GCD)2. The buyer is binding the retailer to the financial risks of their purchasing decisions3. The buyer devotes the time to understanding how a new company in an entirely new product category manifests in terms of market performance.1. Allegiance of the Buyer to the Best Interest of the Retailer:The buyer is employed by the retailer (ie responsible for the buyer’s financial well-being) and the buyer has a significant vested interest in the ultimate success of the retailer. By vested interest, I am referring to the fact that the buyer has made significant time investments in becoming a purchasing agent of the firm & emotional investments in terms of the social & professional clout that this trusted position confers. Therefore, basing our strategic market position decisions based on the feedback of the individual is means that they are actively seeking2. Financial Obligations of the Purchasing Decisions:It is in the buyer’s best interest in limiting the downside risk of bad decisions. Therefore, it is really in their best interest to purchase lower price (i.e. small financial constraints) in lower volumes to ensure that if the product doesn’t sell well, the retailer will not be negatively burdened with the financial obligations of the purchase. After all, GCD will be one very small portion of the aggregate financial performance of the retailer.New products in new categories represents a very risky proposition for the retailer. Uncertainty is a scary things and causes people to limit the negative future implications of adverse events. The buyer should push to the downside to help alleviate fears from uncertainty regarding product performance. If the product performs well, the buyer can try to place additional orders in season or push purchases off until next season.By virtue of GCD being such a small player in terms of the overall composition of the buyer’s purchasing portfolio, we should be careful to understand this as we define the pricing strategy.3. Investments in the GCD Market OpportunityBy virtue of relying on the buyer’s purchasing patters to define a dual pricing system as a means to define the best pricing strategy, we are saying that the buyer has devoted the time to truly evaluating the opportunity for this product. GCD is the company that has been spending all of our time thinking about the product - GCD posses the vision for where it is performing. The buyer is making very little time investments (maybe one hour between tradeshow and writing the order) - how is that really enough time to understand the true value of this product in the marketplace.If we rely solely on the feedback from buyer’s then we are saying that we believe in their abilities to asses strategic opportunities. How do we know if they are any good? How long they have been on the job? This is a very risky proposition for a company to be basing strategic decisions on the buyers ability to asses business opportunities.Bottom Line: It is risky to rely on the uncertain quality & conflicting allegiances of buyers to be defining the position of this product in the marketplace.Risks of Dual Prices as a Means of ExperimentationThe value of having dual prices is that we can experiment with the feedback from the representative marketplace about what the consumer feels is the best fit. When you conduct an experiment, you should test for one variable to serve as a means to compare the results. In the dual pricing scenario, we have 2 variables - Quality & Price.In the case of GCD, there is a tangible difference in Quality of the two different prices. If the goal is experiment with the appropriate pricing position of the goods then it would make sense to control the Price variable to see if the ultimate customer perceives the value of the product at a given level. To experiment, let’s position both quality variables (eg Cosmo-stretch material & Bear-stretch material) in the same price category.It is important to present a clear product offering to the consumer so that the message we are selling is the product and not confusion on the price. However, testing new prices is important to help gauge our value. We can employ tools like Amazon Mechanical Turks. This is a service that allows you to have an on demand labor force for real people to perform tasks with low investments. There is a survey option that will allow us to select certain demographic information such as women with household incomes $250k and have them fill out a survey for $.50/answer.Conducting market research has historically been extremely expensive. However, with new technology applications, these costs are dropping dramatically. There are numerous other tools that we can employ to gain market research while still presenting a strong, unified brand to the consumer.3. The Quality & Price Dissonance DichotomyEarly on at VÆL, we made a strategic decision to split certain looks from the premium VÆL Project into a more price-conscious line called Black Labs. Black Labs was going to “get” the more athletic, “popular” designs from VÆL, but at the price point that would drive revenue growth. As we evaluate pricing decisions, there was an example from one model in particular that comes to mind that can serve as a model.When you put the Borg Mid and the Taxi next to one another, there is a clear quality difference. The VÆL Borg Mid had supple leather that just looked more refined and higher quality. However, by virtue of putting the two shoes next to one another, we implicitly began guiding the buyer that these are “comparable products”. During the selling season, retailers were constantly providing feedback that they love the quality of VÆL, but the price of Black Labs. Everyone wants what they cannot have and we established the strengths of each product independently (i.e. Quality of VÆL & the Price of Black labs). Therefore, the Quality value proposition of the high end model was inherently undermined by the ready comparison to the lower priced option.When you get into Quality / Price comparison between highly congruent products (ie Black Covers in 2 prices) , the value proposition of the high quality is undermined by the pricing considerations of the low price. The buyer says I want the most value so I want the Quality of this product and the Price of this one - thereby establishing an intrinsic expectation that is unable to be fulfilled by GCD. We are inherently shooting ourselves in the foot by setting the concept of comparable entities with conflicting expectations.By virtue of offering ONE price, we are setting the discussion on the level playing field. The buyer will not know that there is the ability to get a lower priced good. Therefore, the discussion is centralized around the product (a strong negotiating position for GCD) versus pricing (a weak negotiating position for GCD).Strategic Brand Segmentation:From the beginning, we have discussed the values of ultimately building three product tiers (eg premium, mid-line, & commodity). Therefore, we can’t introduce a secondary price point at launch when we are planning on introducing a comparable price level in the future. We will be sacrificing future strategic vertical opportunities in the evolution of GCD as an organization.4. Luxury Consumer PsychologyThe majority of luxury consumption is made up of aspirational luxury - or consumers looking to purchase high end products because they want to be ascribed with the successful qualities inherent in achieving the means to purchase such brand. This endemic factor is a considerable driver to the US economy and serves as the impetus for the wildly successful rise of private sales sites like Gilt Groupe. The point is that consumers want the image, but they don’t really don’t care about what they product is that they are purchasing.In order to dive into this logic a little more we have to define our target consumer & understand that the majority of revenue will be driven by consumers aspiring to our target. Who is our target consumer:Age: 30+Career: Finance (Women in Finance Conference in NYC, Louboutin is standard issue), Fashion, High-Level Corp (CEO, marketing, operations, etc), NGO/Non-profitActivities: Yoga / Runner, probably in good shape, and shops at Whole FoodsThere are some fairly well documented luxury fashion marketing concepts that illustrate that the majority of women purchasing premium heels are those aspiring to that image. In addition, we know that the qualitative factors detailed above in conjunction with the income needed to support $700+ discretionary purchase defines small fraction of the US female population. Therefore, we can assume that the majority of the purchases will be occurring on consumers reaching the purchase of the heel via credit cards.Because of how debt has developed in modern society (read Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morality) - we have an cultivated a sense of guilt in our moral constructs when taking on liability to fulfill the obligations of a debt purchase. We feel badly about not paying on our debts (aside from the rat-bastard evil bankers that propagated the housing boom), because if someone owed us money, we would want it paid.We have defined two very important aspects of the consumer’s psychology:1. Majority of purchases will be driven by aspirational luxury2. Guilt-influenced shopping experienceIf these are the constructs that will characterize the purchase of the prime product (eg the Louboutin heels) then the accessory needs to recognize this state of being. Thus the brand of the heel is what the consumer is looking to showcase for social presence and serves as the driving factor for the purchase. Thus if the consumer is already reaching then a two tier pricing structure will drive the consumer to focus solely on cost when evaluating the use of this good - Thereby undermining the High Price for the Low Price.Focusing on Price:Basing decisions on price is always, always, always a losing battle that degrades the nature of the brand. Great brands exists beyond price because the value of the product is driven by market perception (i.e. intangible things that the consumer cannot control). Pricing is a weak position because the only place to go is down - you cannot raise prices. Therefore setting the stage for the discussion surrounding price inherently positions the brand for decline in the long run.There are a couple of additional reasons to not tier the pricing:Confusing the Buyers: Never underestimate how dumb your customer is. If there is a misspelling or things are not laid out perfectly, the buyer will freak out and send emails looking for resolution / clarification. This is bad as it opens the door for a customer service screw up. Also, the may order the low price thinking that it’s a substitute good & when they get it, they don’t like it. This possibility opens the organization to return risks.Confusing the Consumer: After making several sketches, think about how this will be merchandised at the store level. How will you put two black units in different prices on a special shelf that will make sense as to why one black is $80.00 and another is $125.00. With limited shelf space this is a difficult proposition5. Market Comparables to Drive Pricing LogicAfter doing a fair amount of research, here are some comparable pricing considerations to take into account:Women's Gloves at accessories are all listed at $80s for Private Label & $130s for good comparable lines.Women's Wallets sell at 17-20% of comparable Handbags - Thus, avg price of $750 for shoes = $130 - $150 @ 17%Women's Burberry Scarves sell @ 13-15% of Trench Coats - Thus, supporting the $130 figure on $750 shoesBy setting the price at $99 - we just lost $30/unit. This was a problem that we had a VAEL - we priced based on startup costing versus what the market was telling us. There is plenty of market information to offer some guides for our fit rather than simply "Cost +" - shouldn't there be a lot more effort placed into pricing?

“Go to a tropic third world country, get off of your car, bring half a dollar worth for your lunch, and walk to school, kid.”That’s the only thing I’m going to say to her and let the world do its magic to teach her.Now, now, before going on all rage asking what I’ve done to the world with how dare you moral speech, I’ve done nothing. I’m just trash who use more plastic trash and use fuel and breathe out CO2, taking my privilege of the world while waiting to die. Having organic recyclable wrapped food, taking city transport, and using electric vehicles are very expensive here. Do that for less than two weeks and I would barely be able to afford a bottle of water for lunch for the rest of the month until the next payroll. I do plant trees every time I move into a new house though, and trying to live with R3 (reuse, reduce, recycle). But yep, I pretty much have done nothing.Then how dare you criticize an autistic/Asperger/brave/innocent/pure Greta?I don’t know, maybe because I’ve lived long enough and isn’t guided blindly by scientific approach alone while millions of households are dying? I don’t criticize her, I just ask her to learn more point of view and then come back to the world with applicable solutions/systems. Emphasis on APPLICABLE.I’ve read every statement she made and every video publicly made by her, everything I can get my hands on. I have notes for her speeches—from the first time I watched them—and if anyone cares enough to read before having the next hunger games in the comment section. I can only copy two of them since it’s going to be super long.Her first video I found:Where should I begin . . . eh, okay, first thing first, ‘adults don’t give a damn about my future’.Oh, kid, but I do, that’s why I asked you to go to school. Because school is not about learning 1+1 equals 2. It’s about learning history, economy, observation on human behaviours, wise, opinions, point of views, social cases, why many things have asterisks, that there are unlimited numbers between one and two, why you can’t get something without sacrificing other things, why silence is a crime but also gold, also other matters you can’t get from scientific reports about climate change alone. This isn’t a cartoon, and let’s be factual here, you’re not Rick Sanchez or as smart as he is, neither do I. That’s why I went to study in school and university because I’m dumb. I knew that I know nothing and I knew if I do more studies, I will see the bigger and bigger picture of everything while realizing how I know so little about everything.Now, the second, its integration with politic in Sweden, I’m going to ask her this. Did you read Sweden’s 2018 SGI report?Perhaps the biggest challenge facing the Swedish government in late 2017 involves accommodating and integrating large number of asylum-seekers that have arrived in Sweden.(2018 Sweden Country Report, page 2)OrSweden’s long-term strategic ambitions are global competitiveness, a lean but effective and productive public sector, and carefully managed international influence.(2018 Sweden Country Report, page 4)OrHowever, even during high-growth periods, the government has recorded relatively high levels of unemployment. Whether these are the result of shortcomings in the preparing of students for worklife or invisible thresholds to entering the labor market, unemployment in general and youth unemployment, in particular, remains a problem.(2018 Sweden Country Report, page 5–6)They’re pieces of the ‘summary’ of the report published on March 7th 2018, very little to none mentioning about the environment. Even in the body of the report mentions less than about 2 pages worth of climate change, why you asked? Maybe you’re right because they just don’t care, or maybe because there are tons of urgent matter in hand that needs more attention like suicidal, educational failure, and unemployment rate. Like, literally, some of your neighbourhood are starving, depressed, and dying, Greta.I mean, great idea! Let’s spend the whole Sweden’s national budget on environmental research and on how to change to the expensive earth-friendly living standard, shall we? You care about your future, so let’s neglect the ‘now’ problems. Though some of the kids on your age in your neighbourhood can’t even think about living up to their next month let alone their 70s and talk to their grandchildren about climate, that doesn’t matter, right? Your future is more important and is in danger.But that’s not what Greta was saying!I’d say, b*tch, please. That’s exactly what she was saying in that video.I didn’t just read 50 pages worth report of other country’s progress to get lectured by close-minded peers who are educated about world’s progress on climate change by misinformed 15 (now 16) years old, so please, zip it.Our planet is dying! It’ll be dead in near years, say, scientists! My future is in danger and everyone despite knowing the greenhouse effects, but don’t know the exact consequences. Force politicians to make the climate problems on their note, on the first page, and if they didn’t do as their promise, they’re lying!Greta, honey, pay attention to your teachers. Because even in developing countries like mine, they’re teaching us about climate change since grade school, the real effects. The teachers asked us to plant at least one tree on each house, even did some gardening on third grade. They taught me about R3, how to help by reducing the use of CFC, and do more walk if the distance is not too far. They also taught me why it can’t be done immediately, why it takes so many times, money and brainpower to actually save our planet. They just didn’t teach me to point my finger at people or the UN, but they taught me that when I point my forefinger to people, three other fingers on my own hand are pointed back at me.The R20 World Summit, May 2019:Know the matter but don’t know the real consequences until 2:12I’ve explained it. Go to school.School strikes, we gained attention but we’re not leaders. None leaders are scientists, unfortunatelyExactly, go to school, be leaders who support scientists, if you can. But you know, if scientists become leaders, they would become leaders and not scientists, vice versa.Responsibility about climate change awareness is famous people’s responsibilitiesI envy you, really. You’re so . . . simpleminded for 16 years old.Green business and green economy is not primaryI don’t want to assume the worst, but I take what you mean literally, so in the world I know, in my reality, it’s fatal. It really is. When you take climate change seriously but don’t take green business and green economy as much as serious . . . do you really want to go back experiencing what happened in 2000–2002[1]and a few years after that when the biggest oil company met its downfall? Wait, you haven’t been born. So maybe you should.Now look at how many people depended on an oil company in my country alone, the employment reached 40,922 in 2016, probably has multiplied by the recent years. That is just the number of the employees, not including people who depended on oil and gas[2]for their business and daily lives, not including their families who depended on their income, or the country who has their shares in[3]this oil company which the shares and taxes used for helping the people in this country. Or even people who use a drop of the company’s fortune for their scholarship to continue their study so they could become, you know, scientists.Talk to them, Greta. Talk to their kids. Talk to them about how you urged the world to take down those oil, plastics, and traditional companies. About how you need your childhood back and your future to be established while you’re taking others’ childhoods and futures.That aside, you know what? These money greedy corporations actually care and forced to care about green, they have to, the countries which part of the UN are urged to make policy about it. Even when the CSR[4] is not always about the environment, they do care, they did something. They just need time and sources to be more eco-friendly without firing anybody, hurting their productions, and losing investors. Perhaps you want something like Elon’s companies?It’s going to be drip down sarcasm from now on so bear with me.How come climate change isn’t the first priority?Good question. Really good. The number of people who could possibly die because of climate change? 250,000 each year approximately from 2030–2050. That’s a lot. Like, almost 700 people a day! Like 5,000 of people die everyday in my country alone and 1,8 million each year, not like they’re matters anyway, but damn 250,000 is a lot!Though you know what’s way more lot?Approximate death because of depressions and suicide in 2020: 1,5 million[5]Death because of hunger and hunger-related disease in 2018: 9 million[6]Death because of cancer in 2018: 9,6 million[7]I don’t want to add the percentage of people who died because of World War II because it’s a fricking scary number to lose just in 6 years. Imagine World War III.That’s why they’re priorities.News and TV about climate change being urgentYes, we should! I mean, social awareness about the economy, children’s health, infrastructure, and education are not as important as the increase in the world’s temperature, right? Right? It’s not like we learned that in school already, what am I saying, pfft.Planes and jetsOf course, we shouldn’t be adding more airports! CO2 emission, I mean. Wow. Yeah, let’s use something as safe as titanic to carry important people. It’s not like the sea is the most dangerous place in the world or anything, but what would I know, right? I’m just an undergraduate accountant.Even when we’re developing zero-emission planes, airports are still needed, Greta.Most leader act like everything is under control, you need to see the whole pictureYou know, once you become a leader, that’s what happens. Cool, act like you know things, calm down, everything is under control. Just how people would look at you if you become the president and having anxiety in the eye of the public?Also, what was the picture is about again? Your exploited childhood and compromised future of your non-existed children? Um . . . okay.If you think you can solve the crisis by simple solution by adding panels and adding electric cars to the business, then people would think they can solve the crisis without anyone making real efforts. And that is dangerous because specific isolated solutions like is no longer enough. And you know this.. . . I lost words. It’s your speech that is dangerous, my dear.We’re simply not aware of the solutions in front of usWhat is it am I not seeing? Should I stop breathing to reduce CO2 emission? What?So instead of focusing on a solution that’s we do not even know exist, they have to focus on informing us about the actual problem*sighs* go to school.In summary a few last-minute; we shouldn’t act like we’re under control, we shouldn’t act calm and logical, we should go on march every Friday and telling everyone that the world is on fire because we don’t have time to act calm and find practically applicable solution because ‘winning slowly is the same as losing when it comes to climate crisis’Now, I need to know whoever made this speech. This speech sounded like a kid who demands an iPhone and tells their parents who don’t have the money, “I want an iPhone! I want it now!” Like, oh my God. *sighs* *rubs forehead*The longer we wait, the hardest it’ll be turn around aroundGreta, you know, something huge and fast like trucks, trains, ships you ride-on can’t be turned immediately. Society is way harder, bigger, and faster than those things. Those people you pointed at, in that room, trying to turn this enormous ship called ‘the world’ around while maintaining balance with minimum to zero casualties. Do you have any idea how hard that is?They have gotten away with stealing our future and selling it for profitsAh, yes. Tell me, the phone you’re using, the computers your precious scientists using for their projects, the elder of the machine you used for your voyage, the paper you used for that speech, the mic, podium, your clothes, hairband, hair products. Let’s have a discussion about it, it’ll be interesting.Thank youYou’re welcome :)Footnotes[1] Enron scandal - Wikipedia[2] Companies Affected Most by Oil Prices [3] Pertamina Has Begun Sharing Financial Data With Tax Office, in Real Time[4] PT Pertamina (Persero)[5] Epidemiology of Suicide and the Psychiatric Perspective[6] 15 Striking World Hunger Statistics | The Borgen Project[7] Cancer

Absolutely. Assembling an appropriate answer appears achievable, assuming an articulate author appropriately adept at alliteration.Behold, by being brave, but besides boldness by brainstorming before beginning, broadcasting brief blurbs becomes bizarre but basic babbling.Continuing, casual crowd commenters can concur, collectively checking current compositional constraints controlling character choice, concerning certain crackpot creative chores, chiefly claiming common cunning's compelled conclusion, comprising conjectured chore conquerability (circumstantially) carrying clear caveats cautioning care, considering calling colossal commitments complete cinches could convey controversial cool confidence.Don't dare doubt David's diligence doing deeds demanding deft, devious design, dear discussion denizen, deeming dogged determination doesn't darken David's door; during diction's driest drudgery, despite delightful daydreams delaying development, destiny's death-defying daredevil detail deviser dodges despair, denying defeat, displaying devotion demonstrating dreary deliberation doubles daft drama's devastating dynamic disposition, dovetailing directly.Edit: People have asked for more, so here is another.English enthusiasts eagerly envision enhanced emotional elevation, exceeding even existing examples' elicited elation, encountering each ensuing eccentric exercise, ergo everyone's esteemed enlisted essayist (enchanted!) ensures each exquisite excerpt exhibits explosive expressive efficacy evincing either excruciating editing effort, extreme endurance, engineering excellence, etc., else elemental extemporaneous effervescence, entertaining enough except -- explaining earnestly -- entailing eventual emergency; essentially, endorsing ever-escalating elaborate experimentation encourages extravagant excesses, especially emphasizing expectations encompassing elusive execution extending established events -- exclusively employing equal everyday emblems (E's, e.g.) embodying each emblem ensemble's earlier end (elsewhere enunciated easily) -- evaluating endowing entirely equivalent eloquence eternally, envisaging electronic education's emerging endeavor enjoying eight, eleven, even eighteen entries, exploits experts empirically estimate expending extra-Einstein egghead energy engendering environmentally evil, Earth-exposing exhaled exhaust emissions.Five funny features feel fairly finished for forum fodder, foolish followers falsely fancy, for failing further focus fueling full foresight, fellow fiction fanciers frankly forget fundamental facts framing fruits from frenzied freelancing, for first fragments flowing from frantic freshman fingers frequently fall flat, forming forced, flawed fakeries feigning fluency, faded facsimiles fractionally fitting for fatuous Facebook flapdoodle, familiar formulaic fragments famously fouling friends' feeds; fine, for furthermore, fascinatingly, first forays facing far-flung fringe frontiers, finding faith's fortitude ferociously fighting formidable foes -- fear, frustration, flaky functioning, foot fungus -- forge foundations for future feats, figurative furniture for fortune's foyer, faintly favoring fantastic fairytale fates, fervently foremost finally finishing forever.Good grief, getting gobsmacked glimpsing great glory gushing goofy gibberish generates growing gaiety, gladdening geekery's gracious groupie (greetings), generally greasing God's genetically ghostwritten gearbox governing giddiness gainsaying glumness: graphically, guts, glands -- generously, gantries guiding glowing glee grains granting genuine giggles, graceful gadgets guarding geniality's green garden gate; gobbledygook, gentle guy/girl gathering: grin given glimmering gold; gasp gratuitously guzzling glittery glamor (greedily, gilded gramophones gurgling garbled Gangnam getting groovy gyrating go-go gals gamely gesturing galloping); groan giant, gutteral groans given glaringly glib games, gross grammatical goulash, gloppy gumbo grouping gimmicks galore: gawkish gymnasts gliding gallantly, gingerly grasping gigantic grotesque gorillas; guileless genius guaranteeing gullible gala-goers grimy garbage garnering ghastly grapevine gossip (galling grieving geriatrics gripping geraniums gentrifying grandpa's grave); ghoulish gory galleries giving grimacing guests grisly gas, grunting gruffly: go gag gobbling grass, goddamn gibbon, get gone guilty gent, git!Huge hits have historically harbored hidden hazards, hysterical hordes hardly heeding how habitually heaping honors hyping his Holiness, Harry Harangue-Hatcher, hollering, "Hip hip, hooray! Hail Hypertext Highway's happening hack!" heavily heightens his hedonism, hubris, head hugeness -- harsh harbingers hurling humanity's hardiest hero hellward, hereafter helming his hapless human husk haunting Hades's hallmark hot haze, heckling Halloween's hideous headless horseman (hefting his hollow head), harassing Hitler's hired Holocaust henchmen, hassling ham-handed helicopter handlers -- hopefully, hypothetically, having hardcore horizontal hugs holding his horny, high-heeled hourglass honey (he handily helped hang her hemp Hawaiian hammock), heartland's "happy" housewife humbling hotel heiress Hilton, heinously having hated her husband's horsey hee-haw "hello," his hundred horrible hay howls hammering her homicidal; however, have heart, huddled hint hobbyists, hearkening how hallowed hieroglyphs hurtling hence harmonize hypnotically, heaven's harps highlighting how hyperactive hippocampus hockey heaves hilarious harvested hash -- healthy herbs healing hungry humor hankerings.Edit: Thanks for the kind words, everyone! Here is letter I.It is intriguing, if I innocently introspect, inquiring into industriousness, imagining isolating its ingredients, i.e. internal impetuses instrumental in inspiring indefinite intransigence in inking inane, ignoble illustrations (illuminating immoderate idiom's indomitable impetuosity, its irrepressible impishness, in infinite iterations), intently ignoring indolent inclinations inducing interest in idly inspecting Internet idiocy instead -- insouciantly ingesting incessant immature innuendos insulting impromptu interactive images, inevitably imbibing insipid informational items interpreting important issues incorrectly; if indeed impressive inner influences inhere in intrepidly indulging improbable initiatives, I informally identify: idiosyncratic innate impulses involving inflexible ideals; incurable insomnia; iron intestinal integrity; insufficiently inebriated introversion; indubitably, intellectual imperative imitating insecure icicles in impaling indifferent inactivity.Jumping Jehoshaphat, J's jaunty jangle jovially jolts jaded jargon junkies, justifying judicious juggling joining jocose journal jottings; judging Job's Judaic journey jejune, jamming jousts (jointly, jabs) jeopardizing joyful June/July junctures -- just jubilate, juvenilely jacking jumbo Jamba Juice jugs joking jumbled jingles jollify jail's jeering junior janitors.Knucklehead knaves karate-kicking King Kong's kidneys kneel, kindred kibitzers, keenly knowing kempt knights knead keyboards, knitting kooky keynotes -- kerosene kinetically kindling kinky kittens' kisses, kiddingly kidnapping Kim Kardashian's kingdom keys, knotting klutzy Kanye's knickers; knappish killjoys, kowtow: kryptonite k-key knacks keep knowledge-knockers knackered.Look lively, listless language lovers, learning lame lulls lack lasting legitimacy lessening lofty literature's lumbering, lurching locomotion; leaving Local Lunatic Linguist listing letters, let's lazily luxuriate, losing life's latest little lingering laments like landlords limit lawless louts' leases, least-leniently letting long-lost loathesome lecturers lambaste liberated leaders, lucidly laughing: Listen -- lending lighthearted levity lubricates lavish labor, launching latent legato lyrics like larynx-lodged lasagna; likewise, licking lollipops; looping leashes loosely; lustily locking lips; lemon-lime lozenges; large-lidded lunch liquids; lastly, low light levels limning luscious landscapes.