Description Of Topic(S: Fill & Download for Free

As a woman with a passion for topic ontology who has embarked on a quest to structure as many topics as possible into logical hierarchies, I've noticed a few issues which perhaps could be helped by tweaking the Quora interface.1) There are an awful lot of lonely topics out thereBy lonely, I mean topics with no description, no picture, no location, no parents or children, and in many cases, not even any questions associated with them.I'd like to propose that the UI for topic creation be changed, so that when a person creates a new topic, they're immediately prompted to fill in some or all of the following:a brief description,a parent or child topic or both,a group that it should belong to (with a searchable box which only brings up group names),an image,a location,aliases,etc.Obviously, there would have to be an option to skip these steps to prevent users becoming frustrated.Even better, the topic creator would also be asked, before the topic is created:"Is this topic already covered by one of these?"and the Quora engine would suggest a list of related topics and terms.After all the other information about the topic has been filled in, or skipped, the Quora engine would hopefully also be clever enough to ask the topic creator:"Does this topic apply to any of these questions?"and suggest a list of questions which may be related to this new topic.At the very least, this might cause more Quora users to think carefully about the need to create a new topic, and make them aware of Quora features which they may not have been familiar with (such as parent-child relationships). This increased thought and awareness can only improve the quality of Quora content.2) There are a lot of duplicate topics out there needing to be mergedDiscussion amongst Quora reviewers has revealed some divergent opinions about how to merge topics, particularly when one encounters one topic name in a less preferred format but lots of content, and a duplicate topic name which has a preferred name format, but doesn't have this content. Whilst we could debate for undoubtedly quite a long time ;) on how best to perform such a merge, this could easily be resolved by modifying the merge feature so that everybody's objectives are achieved.What would be great is if you could say that you want to merge topic 1 and topic 2, with direction being largely irrelevant, and then have the user choose which property of each is to be retained in the merged topic. So after indicating that the topics should be merged, the user would be presented with, for example:Name for merged topic: choice of Topic 1 or Topic 2Description: Topic 1 or Topic 2 or combine both then editImage for merged topic: image of Topic 1 or image of Topic 2 or another imageFollowers of topic: Combined by default (ie followers of topic 1 plus followers of topic 2)Location: Topic 1 or Topic 2 or another locationQuestions: combined topic tagged to all questions which were tagged with either topic 1 or topic 2Aliases: Combination of topic 1's aliases + topic 2's aliases + topic 1 name + topic 2 name - "name of merged topic"Adding this functionality would make merging of topics to be performed much more easily, whilst increasing the chance of all valuable content being retained.

I will paraphrase Billy F. Gibbons, who compared single pickup guitars to Albert Einstein’s practice of buying only black suits: “It eliminates the necessity of choosing.”The advantage of a single pickup guitar is it forces you to use the volume and tone controls more creatively and to use your right and left hand to pull the tones out of the guitar.I have a mid-50’s LP Jr. with a single P-90, and the tonal range is quite remarkable. I plug it into my 1960 Champ, and really work the three controls-amp volume, guitar tone and volume. It’s amazing.Edit: Thanks for the upvotes on this narrow topic. I decided to add some description of the settings.First, a nice clean ringing sound: Amp: 3 Guitar volume 5-8 Guitar tone control 10. Rolling the tone back to 8-9 can produce a slightly sweeter sound.Second, slight overdrive: Amp volume 5-7 Guitar volume 10 guitar tone 8-10. Again, rolling the tone control back just a little produces a smoother sounding overdrive sound.Third, crushing overdrive: You guessed it: 10, 10, 10. Raspy, biting sound.Fourth, "woman tone", made famous by Clapton in the Cream era. Amp volume 10, Guitar volume 10, guitar tone 0-1. Not quite fuzz, but close.The real surprise is discovering that sweet spot when you roll the tone control back just a little. I really never used the tone controls on my other guitars before being able to hear what they do in a single pickup guitar context.

First thing first, a lot of the posts in this thread are INFJs saying that they are not “Know it Alls”, but rather that they are always right. A “know it all” is someone who always acts like they have supreme and objective knowledge of a fact or subject. If you read through this thread then you would see why INFJs perfectly fit this description. Having said that INFJs do possess a keen insight that often makes them very knowledgable. Their introverted intuition makes them like a sponge and they constantly soak up information. Along with this, their feeling function gives them a very keen view into the human psyche and other’s feelings (Something which I can say that I like as a Thinking type).The INFJs I know personally do not seem like “know-it-alls” initially. While they are excellent to talk to and they are often very willing to participate in a friendly debate, there are incredibly stubborn about the subject that they are emotionally invested in. With these subjects, they often feel like they have a duty to educate others on the topics. Inside of their minds, they use their intuition to make decisions about these topics and thus form an underlying narrative about the topic(s). the problem is once they have made up their mind about these subjects they refuse to be swayed. In this regard, they are a “know-it-all” because of their refusal to give up their beliefs. However, in the real world, they are often reserved and try not to get to passionate about their beliefs in public.Now if you are online there are a lot of INFJs who use their INFJ status as a way to prove their point as someone who is always right. To see what I mean, just read through this thread and looking at INFJ’s answers to this question.However, generally, INFJs are cordial, friendly, empathetic, and reserved. Most of the time, they do not want to seem like a “know it all”. In fact, if you ever told an INFJ that they are a “know it all” they would probably be appalled at themselves.