Release Of Liability Assumption Of Risk And Parental: Fill & Download for Free

In the book Modern Money Theory by L. Randall Wray, the author declares of MMT (that is, Modern Monetary Theory) that it will go through three phases of public opinion.First, it will be ridiculed. Second, it will be violently opposed. Third, and finally, it will be accepted as self-evident. I’m not sure if it will play out that way, but I’m here for offer an essay which is probably straddling the first and second phases.Interestingly, this prediction was word for word what a certain Elizabeth Holmes declared in this videowhen she was making her final, desperate bid to save Theranos from its inevitable failure.Anecdotally, I’d point out that Ms. Holmes bears a passing resemblance to the somewhat older but similarly crazy-eyed poster child of MMT, Professor Stephanie Kelton. More on her in a bit.The ImpetusAs with so many ideas in modern history, the seed for doing this post was planted in my head, unwittingly, by Dennis Gartman.You see, back when Bitcoin was roaring toward its peak of $20,000, Mr. Gartman stated that although he didn’t believe in bitcoin as an investment, he did understand the excitement about the underlying technology.That bugged me more than you might guess. I’ve been mixed up with technology since 1979, and I have lived my entire adult life in my beloved Palo Alto, California. I am deeply involved in the startup culture, and I have spent a fair amount of time studying cryptocurrencies.And yet, with all that, I barely know what the hell I’m talking about. So, as presumptuous as it might be on my part, I daresay Dennis knows only a fraction of what I do about crypto, yet he had the temerity to declare his support of digital currencies (specifically, the “technology”) on national television, when in fact, I strongly suspect he didn’t have the first clue about it, except perhaps for mumbling a few words about how it has something to do with a “ledger.”Thus, I didn’t want to be like Dennis when it came to MMT. And as much as people these days are talking about it, particularly on the political scene, I decided to spend an ungodly amount of time reading articles, watching videos, and reading cover-to-cover the not-terribly-exciting book I mentioned above.In fact, it was a total slog. But I made it through, and now I feel that I’m at least qualified at cocktail parties to proffer a well-informed opinion without looking like a total choad.I will mention, with respect to the book, that a drinking game came to mind during its reading. Specifically:each instance of “it takes two to tango” appears: one shot;each instance of the word “keystrokes“: one sip of beer;each instance of the word “wonky“: two shots;every time the author mentions how Keynes declared that the money of account has been chosen by the state for at least the past 4,000 years: two shots and toss some salt over your shoulderFor any of you intent on reading the book, please do not engage in this game, as I fear cirrhosis of the liver will be the inevitable result. Let’s just say the repetition started to get under my skin after a while.Their BiasesI should make clear what I perceive as the biases, or shall we say assumptions, of the MMT crowd. In no particular order:A breathless adulation of John Maynard Keynes;A seething hatred of cryptocurrencies;Patronizing pity for the vast majority of people who don’t “get” MMT;Adoration of the government as the largest and most important part of our economy;Above all else, belief in the riskless nature of creating as many trillions and trillions of dollars as we need in order to create full employment.Professor Wray writes over and over and over again about these points, with the overarching tone being that, God damn it, if people would just realize how money and the economy work today in the real world, we could solve all our important problems just by creating trillions and trillions of dollars and hurling them at infrastructure, jobs, and whatever else was needed to cure our woes. I get the sense his heart is in the right place, as is Ms. Kelton’s, but I’m far from convinced. In fact, I think the entire exercise is an intellectual experiment which sounds enticing in the classroom but, like Communism, would be a complete disaster with actual human beings.My BiasesIn fairness, i should probably lay out some of my own dispositions. To be clear, I have absolutely no ax to grind. It’s not important to me whether people despise MMT or love it. My entire mission was to learn about it for myself, and I’m writing this post with some off-the-cuff impressions just because I write for a living and might as well share my thoughts.In any case, just so you know where I am coming from:I have always had an intuitive rejection of the idea that we should create trillions of dollars to optimize the welfare of our nation. Indeed, I would have vastly preferred, during the financial crisis, three to four years of agonizing financial mayhem, complete with massive bankruptcies, dislocations, and unemployment, instead of the nearly $60 trillion in bailouts that took place, because I think had we done so, we’d be in a vastly better place now. But we didn’t. So our friends at Goldman Sachs are still very much with us, ruling the roost.I’m a libertarian at heart, and thus bristle at government interference. In fact, the size of our government is loathsome to me, whereas the MMT crowd not only loves how big government is, but would have no problem with it being much, much larger (France is offered as an example, since 50% of their economy is evidently the government itself, which doubtless explains all the fabulous French innovations we keep seeing day after day.)Let Them Make This ClearThe sense I got from the book as well as the pro-MMT articles I read was consistent: if we poor bastards in the general public who weren’t on the MMT train would just get a few basics through our thick skulls, we’d be part of their religion faster than you can say Benjamin Shalom Bernanke.A few of these principles are:Sovereign governments are not like households when it comes to money (for instance, when it comes to balancing budgets) because they are currency issuers. Lord, do they hit on this again and again. So the quaint notions about revenue (taxes, tariffs, etc.), borrowing (bonds), expenses, and, God forbid, a balanced budget, are considered laughable and childish by the MMT crowd.The entire universe of money is contained in a closed system of three sectors which balance: (i) domestic government, (ii) domestic private, and (iii) foreign. Absolutely everything happens within this system, and one sector’s loss is another sector’s gain, every single time.Currency or money exists for one reason: because the state created a mechanism for citizens to pay their obligations to the state. “Taxes drive currency” was repeated more times than I can count, but the overarching point was that money exists to pay taxes, and the fact that everyone else uses it to buy stuff is incidental.The government can never run out of its own currency, and anyone who believes that a government has to sell bonds or raise taxes in order to generate revenue to spend is a deluded fool.I also noticed a habit with the MMT crowd is to relabel and rename things (I think the euphemism they would use is “re-framing”). They speak of looking at things “from a new perspective”, and to nudge this in their direction, they refer to “The National Debt Clock” as “The National Savings Clock”, for example. It’s just like how Bill Clinton got people to say “invest” instead of “spend” when it came to government projects, but far more insidious.The Munificent StateI have a theory about the excitement about MMT: the past ten years have trained people to rely on the government bailouts and goodies to an unprecedented degree. Just as the 9/11 attacks opened the door for the government to invade our privacy in ways unimaginable before, so too did the financial crisis give the government a free pass to go batshit-crazy with the debt.And, as far as the public is concerned, since the nearly $23 trillion we’ve borrowed hasn’t seemed to have done any harm, they are all ears when people come along proposing that there are plenty more trillions where that came from, and we might as well indulge ourselves some more.Professor Wray offers this:“Government spending for the public purpose is beneficial, at least up to the point of full employment of the nation’s resources.”So not only is the government the largest and most important part of the economy, it is also the most important employer. It’s the job of the Federal Government to hire every single person that wants the job,especially when the private sector doesn’t need them. All the government has to do is dream up something to keep these layabouts busy.Take a moment and, in your mind’s eye: go to the DMV. Go to the Post Office. Go to the Internal Revenue Service. Think for a few moments about the people there. Consider their backgrounds, their lives, and how much they probably despise……….or at least barely tolerate……….their jobs. Imagine what a stampede there must be at precisely 5:00 when they are permitted to leave.That’s the life of a government wage-slave. Millions and millions of them, grey-on-beige, the least motivated, least creative people of the land. That’s what the MMT crowd thinks is our most important employer. Mop up everyone who can’t find a job at McDonald’s, or the local gas station, or the Starbucks on the corner, and create cash and give them something to pass the day away. Every. Single. One.Spending Good. Saving Bad.When I was young, one of the most persistent political dreams in the air was a balanced budget. Indeed, the dream was to actually have a Constitutional Amendment to balance the budget. This was back when the entire debt was less than a trillion dollars, and even that amount, people considered shameful.That ship sailed a long time ago, though, and I’m sure the MMT crowd is delighted. According to them, just about the worst thing in the universe is a balanced government budget, because in their “closed system” mindset of theirs, government deficits are fantastic because it simply means the private sector is enjoying surpluses. Professor Wray writes:“The most unsound budgetary policy is the mindless pursuit of something called a balanced budget – meaning one in which tax “revenues” exactly match government spending over a stated period. If that outcome is achieved, it means that all the government’s currency supplied through its spending will have been returned in tax payments so that the non-government sector has nothing left.”The pearl-clutching gets even worse:“If the government runs a balanced budget, it will have made no net contribution to the financial wealth of the nation.”To which my response is: why should it? I’ll manage my own household and small business, thank you very much. I don’t need the government to create debt in order to give me prosperity.Wanted: BureaucratsIt seems the paradise that MMT folks want is one in which gargantuan undertakings – – – free college for everyone, free healthcare for everyone, trillions of dollars of new infrastructure – – are all made possible by frantically banging the keys on the keyboard to create trillions of new dollars. Conjuring up such a vision, Wray writes:“Imagine how the policy discourse will be changed when our President could no longer claim that Uncle Sam has run out of money. When our government can no longer refuse to create jobs, or to build better infrastructure, or to put astronauts on Mars because of lack of funds…There may be reasons we want to leave millions of workers unemployed, or to live with unsafe bridges and highways, or to remain earth-bound, but lack of funding cannot be one of them.”If any of you think the government has somehow been ‘holding back” on handouts, giveaways, and “assistance”, I offer you this simple chart, which I find breathtaking. Admittedly, it doesn’t include a trip to Mars, but still:MMT pundits refuse to believe that private enterprise can exist and provide on its own. Instead, its partner has to have a monstrously large big brother in the form of a government:“The domestic private sector – by itself – cannot create net financial assets since every financial asset created and held within that sector is offset by a liability within that sector. In order for one sector to accumulate net financial wealth, at least one other sector must increase its indebtedness by the same amount.”Ummm……….what? How about the trillion dollars in value created by the existence of Amazon? Or Microsoft? Or Apple? Within a 5-mile radius of where I am sitting, the value of companies that didn’t even exist twenty years ago represent trillions of dollars of new assets, all created by private enterprise.None of that value was conjured up by a benevolent government “increasing its indebtedness”. It was because good ideas were turned into good companies that created jobs, products, services, and shareholder value. If I want someone to utterly fuck something up, I’ll be sure to get the federal government involved. Otherwise, I’d prefer they just leave me alone.Kelter SkelterEarlier I mentioned the “poster child” for MMT, which is Stephanie Kelton, a professor at Stony Book and the former economic adviser to 2016 candidate Bernie Sanders. Professor Kelton has absolutely grabbed the media spotlight, and my belief is that people would probably prefer to watch her talk……….As opposed to, say, Professor Wray, who knows just as much as Kelton but, nice a guy as I’m sure as he is, isn’t getting the call-backs from TV producers that she has been getting:In fact, I was wondering if I was being wrong-headed imagining the supposed reasoning behind her persistent appearances, but a brief glance at the comments section of any of her published videos will show that I’m not completely imagining this………..In any case, Professor Kelton decries what she calls the “debt hysteria” and suggests people celebrate the trillions of debt we are creating. Her forthcoming book – – – which apparently is such a weighty project, it showed up on Amazon a full year before its release in June 2020- – is called “The Deficit Myth”. Just in time for the big election.she’s excited, everyoneThe bottom line for the MMT crowd is simple: in an economy, as long as the growth rate is higher than the interest rate, you can create as many trillions of dollars as you like without guilt, worry, or peril. The sky is the limit!In fact, presidential candidate Andrew Yang has as his most memorable pledge that $12,000 will be given each year to every single person in the country, no questions asked. Free money! If that’s not buying votes, I don’t know what is.“But what about inflation?!?” some may ask. “Those trillions are going to cause prices to skyrocket!““No, no, dear citizen“, MMT dude would say. “Look at all the trillions over the past decade in the form of TARP, QE1, QE2, Operation Twist. There’s no inflation! It’s harmless!“That would shut most people up, but I actually have an answer for this: all those trillions went to asset inflation for the rich. Mansions. Stock values. Fine art.Those trillions didn’t go to the guys going down to WalMart or stopping by McDonald’s for dinner. If they had, then prices at all those places would be much higher. So as the MMT crowd pounds on the desk, declaring that the relatively mild inflation we have today is proof that new money is harmless, I would say hardly any of that money found itself to the lower 95% whose purchasing power would have actually moved the needle. Andrew Yang’s proposal, however, would absolutely push prices higher.The Fifth DimensionOne of my favorite protestations about MMT came from this article hailing from Business Insider:Imagine if I told you that, of all the animals in the animal kingdom, elephants are unique because they live in five dimensions. All other animals get four dimensions (three physical dimensions plus time). But for some wacky reason, elephants get five. Then further suppose that, when you pressed me on why this is true, I assured you that my theory was sound and you just had to accept it. The analogy here is to the weird place of self-funding governments in MMT. All other entities – households, individuals, businesses – are subject to more “normal” economic rules. Yet somehow governments are the magical alchemist elephants… they supposedly have some bizarre fifth dimension factor (born of self-funding elixir) that makes them normality-exempt.Absolutely! So the MMT people who scoff at regular old citizens like me, who still think that any entity, no matter how large, should still act with prudence when it comes to assets, borrowing, and expenditures. The MMTers seem to roll their eyes and declare that it’s foolish to think of the government as anything akin to one’s household. The rules just don’t apply.News to MeIt seems the longer one lives inside the MMT rabbit hole, the more sane otherwise crazy statements must seem. I offer this from the same book:“The Fed is not a private institution, but rather a creature of Congress and no more independent of government than the Treasury, the Department of Defense, the Department of Transportation, or the Internal Revenue Service…………the Fed serves at the pleasure of Congress.”Yeah, at the pleasure of Congress. That’s why we get to read an annual audit of the Fed, right?There’s more………..“In the United States during the Clinton boom there was a projection that all outstanding US Treasury debt would be retired….if we ever did get to that point….you’d have to turn over your car, house, bank account, and children to the government to pay taxes! That is the logical result of a government surplus carried to infinity.”Financial Circle-JerkAs gluttonous, intrusive, and nettlesome the government already is, MMT says it isn’t doing enough, and that the government should really be a lot more ambitious about how much money it creates and spends, since whatever self-control it is already exercising is misguided:“The sovereign government always gets ‘free lunches’ by keystrokes. The US government potentially gets bigger lunches. However, the truth is that almost all governments – including the US government – have put themselves on near-starvation diets as they refuse the free lunches that are on offer!“Thus, whereas in the Reagan years the mantra was to “starve the beast”, the MMT crowd wants to feed it. Because God knows free enterprise needs the help. Wray allows that private enterprise shouldn’t be absolutely extinguished altogether:“We also need to analyze effects on the private sector. The more resources we remove from private use to allocate to public use, the greater the likelihood that we could have a bloated government sector and a private sector that is too small. We need to leave an adequate supply of resources for the private sector to achieve the private purpose.”And yet, the monstrosity in Washington D.C. really should get larger, since it’s evidently both wise and munificent:“According to Minsky, government was far too small in the 1930s to stabilize the economy (in 1929 the federal government was about 3% of GDP)……..based on current realities, it looks like the national government should range from the US low of about 20% of GDP to a high of 50% in France.”Human NatureAs with Communism, there seems to be with MMT an underlying assumption of innate human goodness, cooperation, and morality. I’m not that cynical about human nature, but to my mind, replacing the dog-eat-dog reality of vying for good jobs with a universal assurance of make-work jobs working for the government doesn’t exactly make my heart sing.Yet Professor Wray seems to think that the pledge of Job Guarantee (JG) and government serving as the Employer of Last Resort (ELR) would be transformative for all society. He states::“Benefits include poverty reduction, amelioration of many social ills associated with chronic unemployment (health problems, spousal abuse and family break-up, drug abuse, crime) and enhanced skills due to training on the job.”Uh-huh.Along with this theme, none other than Keynes is brought back from the grave:“As soon as we have a new atmosphere of doing things, instead of one of smothering negation,everyone’s brains will get busy, and there will be masses of claimants for attention, the precise character of which it would be impossible to specify beforehand.”I’m not sure if you’ve taken a good look at the people that are still unemployed in this jobs-are-begging economy, but the MMT fans are plausibly positing people, once gainfully employed, will attend plays, listen to music, and volunteer, instead of, say, sitting on their giant asses watching the tee-vee.Hey, Wray, what else can you say?“Shorter work days and more paid vacations is a progressive goal to humanize the work place. More time to enjoy one’s family, recreation, and the arts. More time for self-improvement and community involvement.”Yeah. Self-improvement. As I walk down University Avenue and see the crazed homeless wandering around, I know the only thing standing between them and a community center course on self-actualizationis a government job.Utopia, Inc.You can probably gather I’m not exactly a fan of the concept. For me, one of the largest flaws in the thinking is the doe-eyed optimism. Keep in mind, although Wray isn’t as comely as Ms. Kelton (and thus doesn’t get the media exposure), he is one of MMT’s respected authorities, and he states clearly:“Government spends currency in the public interest. It promises to accept its currency in payment. The tax system stands behind our currency, and we pay taxes to keep the currency strong. Good budgeting with transparency and accountability of elected officials ensures government doesn’t spend too much.”Ah, yes. Good budgeting with transparency and accountability. That’s just what we’ve all come to expect from our elected officials. Jesus Christ.And, in a touching coda, here are the closing words of the tome:“We deserve this access not because we pay taxes, but because we’re all in this together. We take care of our own. Government helps us take care of our own through its social spending – for retirement, for medical care, for food stamps, and for support of poor families. We take care of our own. Together we can use money to take care of each other. Together we can make this a better world.“I wonder if someone could print up some fresh dollar bills so I can run out and buy a bucket. I think I’ll be needing it very soon.Honestly, people. I’m a simple soul. And I believe all that dumb stuff our parents told us – – there’s no such thing as a free lunch………you can’t print your way to prosperity………..…it’s actually all true. The silly homespun wisdom that made us all roll our eyes as kids is actually worth heeding.The risk – – and, having learned about MMT, I use the word risk deliberately – – of these ideas propagating into massive reality is, I believe, very small. Hell, the United States couldn’t muster enough wherewithal to change to the metric system, so I seriously don’t think it’s about to turn its economy on its head with this lunacy.Still, with a big election coming up in 2020, and with endless trillion dollar deficits as far as the eye can see, we need to be on the lookout for these kind of ideas so they don’t become a virus of the collective mind. It took me a very, very long time to get even a passing knowledge of these concepts, and I suspect, oh, somewhere close to 98% of the public just wouldn’t bother.But I suggest you bother. It’s worth it to know what that $12,000 check in your mailbox is all about.

£1,100 - £1,500, excluding VAT. Excluding services relocations. Excluding kitchen units supply, including associated works.Please Note:STANDARD DISCLAIMERMOKO BENELLI is furnishing this post "as is". MOKO BENELLI does not provide any warranty of the post whatsoever, whether express, implied, or statutory, including, but not limited to, any warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or any warranty that the contents of the post will be error-free.In no respect shall MOKO BENELLI incur any liability for any damages, including, but limited to, direct, indirect, special, or consequential damages arising out of, resulting from, or any way connected to the use of the post, whether or not based upon warranty, contract, tort, or otherwise; whether or not injury was sustained by persons or property or otherwise; and whether or not loss was sustained from, or arose out of, the results of, the post, or any services that may be provided by MOKO BENELLI.If a recognizable person appears in this post, use for commercial purposes may infringe a right of privacy or publicity. It may not be used to state or imply the endorsement by MOKO BENELLI employees of a commercial product, process or service, or used in any other manner that might mislead. Accordingly, it is requested that if this post is used in advertising and other commercial promotion, layout and copy be submitted to MOKO BENELLI prior to release. It may not be used to state or imply the endorsement by MOKO BENELLI employees of a commercial product, process or service, or used in any other manner that might mislead.ADDITONAL DISCLAIMERSWe do not accept liabilty for our posts being accurate, complete or up-to-date or for the contents of external links. We distance ourselves expressly from the contents of the linked pages, over the structure of which we have no control. This statement is valid for all of the links on the websites and for all contents of the pages to which the links or banners lead.Not responsible for direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages resulting from any defect, error or failure to perform.This post contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. If such risks or uncertainties materialize or such assumptions prove incorrect, the results of this organization and its consolidated subsidiaries could differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and assumptions. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including but not limited to statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; any statements concerning expected development, performance or market share relating to products and services; anticipated operational and financial results; any statements of expectation or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Risks, uncertainties and assumptions include the achievement of expected results and other risks that are described from time to time in quarterly reports. This organization assumes no obligation and does not intend to update these forward-looking statements.Full disclaimer: This post is intended solely for information purposes and are not to be construed, under any circumstances, by implication or otherwise, as an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy or sell or trade in any commodities, securities, or currencies herein named. Information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is in no way guaranteed. No guarantee of any kind is implied or possible where projections of future conditions are attempted. In no event should the content of this report be construed as an express or implied promise, guarantee or implication by or from the services, newsmax or any of its officers, directors, employees, affiliates or other agents that you will profit or that losses can or will be limited in any manner whatsoever. Some recommended trades may involve securities held by our officers, affiliates, editors, writers or employees, and investment decisions may be inconsistent with or even contradictory to the discussion or recommendation in the service. Past results are no indication of future performance. All investments are subject to risk, which should be considered prior to making any investment decisions. Consult your personal investment advisers before making an investment decision. The amount of signed books remaining applied to the original airing of the broadcast only. For privacy protection, abbreviated or fictitious names were used for some of the individuals in this report. While these individuals had great results, results are not the same for everyone. Certain products in this presentation are free with the offer made on our product offer page. The offer may require payment to cover shipping and handling or a subscription to one of our paid newsletters. Please view our terms of use for full disclosure.For office use only.Safe and effective when used as directed.It is a violation of Federal law to use this post in a manner inconsistent with its labeling.This post is effective until terminated.Subject to change without notice.Void where prohibited.Colors may, in time, fade.Simulated picture.May be too intense for some viewers.Sanitized for your protection.Breaking seal constitutes acceptance of Agreement.Do not use if seal is broken.No user-serviceable parts inside.List was current at time of printing.Not responsible for typographical or printers errors.For temporary relief of minor aches and pains.Stop use if condition worsens.If condition persists, consult your physician.In case of overdose, seek professional assistance.Avoid high humidity and excessive heat.Keep cool; process promptly.Apply only to affected area.Do not apply to large areas of the body.Penalty for private use.Do not turn upside down.Do not submerge.Do not swallow.Do not put in eyes.No animals were harmed during testing.This product is meant for educational purposes only.Keep out of the reach of children.Contains a substantial amount of non-tobacco ingredients.Close cover before striking.Do not incinerate.Keep away from heat, sparks and open flame.Failure to sign and return this form results in disqualification.All taxes are the responsibility of the winner.Batteries not included.Some assembly required.Use only as directed.No purchase necessary.This technology is not fault-tolerant and is not designed, manufactured or intended for use or resale as on-line control equipment in the operation of nuclear facilities, aircraft navigation or communication systems, or air traffic control machines in which its failure could lead directly to death, personal injury, or severe physical or environmental damage.No other warranty expressed or implied.Subject to approval.Not affiliated with the American Red Cross.This is not an offer to sell securities.For recreational use only.May cause excitability, epecially in children.All models over 18 years of age.You must be 18 or older to join.Slightly higher west of the Mississippi.Avoid alcoholic beverages while using this product.Freshest if eaten before date on carton.May cause drowsiness.Non-comedogenic.Slippery when wet.Times approximate.List at least two alternate dates.Pre-recorded for this time zone.Edited for television.Contestants have been briefed on some questions before the show.Reproduction strictly prohibited.One size fits all.Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.Not the Beatles.Many suitcases look alike.Contents may settle during shipment.Place stamp here.Drop in any mailbox.Do not stamp.No postage necessary if mailed in the United States.Post office will not deliver without postage.Postage will be paid by addressee.Return to sender / no forwarding order on file / unable to forward.We have sent the forms which seem right for you.At participating locations only.Read label for instructions.This tag may not to be removed except by consumer under penalty of law.Falling rock.For off-road use only.Call toll free number before digging.First pull up, then pull down.Your canceled check is your receipt.Remit in US dollars.Lost ticket pays maximum rate.Substantial penalty for early withdrawal.Check here if tax deductible.Sign here without admitting guilt.Not responsible for any damages compensatory, direct, incidental, consequential or otherwise.Members who have not filed a valid and timely request for exclusion shall be forever barred from suing Defendants and their past, present, and future directors, officers, employees, agents, insurers, shareholders, attorneys, advisors, consultants, representatives, partners, affiliates, parents, subsidiaries, joint venturers, independent contractors, divisions, predecessors, successors, and assigns, for any and all liabilities, claims, causes of action, damages, costs, attorneys' fees, losses, or demands, whether known or unknown, existing or potential, or suspected or unsuspected, that were or could have been asserted in the Actions.Employees and their families are not eligible.Children must be accompanied by an adult.Beware of dog.Avoid contact with skin.Limited time offer; call now to ensure prompt delivery.You must be present to win.No passes accepted for this engagement.Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.Use only in a well-ventilated area.Keep away from fire or flames.Shading within a garment may occur.Clean with soft, dry, lint-free cloth.Replace with same type.Approved for veterans.Some equipment shown is optional.Price does not include taxes.Not sold in stores.Restaurant package; not for resale.No solicitors.No shirt, no shoes - no service.No alcohol, dogs or horses.No anchovies unless otherwise specified.NO CANADIAN COINSNo transfers issued until the bus comes to a complete stop.Driver does not carry cash.Do not speak to the driver.Objects in mirror may be closer than they appear.Your mileage may vary.Do not use while operating a motor vehicle or heavy equipment.Please remain seated until the ride has come to a complete stop.I told you to remain seated until the ride has come to a complete stop.Death or serious injury may occur.Made from 100% recycled posts.Post sold by weight, not volume.Contact manufacturer for a list of nutrients.Some of the trademarks mentioned in this product appear for identification purposes only.Provided "as is" without warranty of any kind.You may not assign your rights under this Agreement to any third party.Pursuant to all federal regulations, past, present and future.This supersedes all previous notices.This Agreement does not grant you any rights.Do not write below this line.FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSThis post contains forward-looking statements and information, which reflect the current view with respect to future events and financial performance. When used in this release, the words "believes", "expects", "plans", "may", "will", "would", "could", "should", "anticipates", "estimates", "project", "intend" or "outlook" or other variations of these words or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements and information. Actual results may differ materially from the expectations expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements as a result of known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Known risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to: risks associated with operating satellites and providing satellite services, including satellite construction or launch delays, launch failures, in-orbit failures or impaired satellite performance; risks associated with satellite manufacturing, including competition, cyclicality of end-user markets, contractual risks, creditworthiness of customers, performance of suppliers and management of factory and personnel; risk associated with financial factors such as volatility in exchange rates, increases in interest rates, restrictions on access to capital, and swings in global financial markets; risks associated with domestic and foreign government regulation, including export controls and economic sanctions; and other risks, including litigation. The foregoing list of important factors is not exhaustive. The information contained in this news release reflects our beliefs, assumptions, intentions, plans and expectations as of the date of this news release. Except as required by law, we disclaim any obligation or undertaking to update or revise the information herein.The views expressed above are solely those of the author and not those of the corporation, its employees, trustees, or assigns.

Recidivism StatisticsThe percentages rearrested (but not necessarily guilty) for the "same category of offense" for which they were most recently in prison for were:13.4% of released robbers22.0% of released assaulters23.4% of released burglars33.9% of released larcenists19.0% of released defrauders41.2% of released drug offenders2.5% of released rapistsContrary to popular belief, as a group, sex offenders have the lowest rate of recidivism of all the crime categories. These statistics completely fly in the face of conventional wisdom about sex offenders being the most likely group of criminals to re-offend for their initial crime, but these are the facts. It could be argued that sex offender recidivism isn't detected and that is why this number is so low, but that could also be said of other crime categories, too.Independent studies of the effectiveness of in-prison treatment programs for sex offenders have shown that evidence-based programs can reduce recidivism by up to 15 percent. This might not sound like much, but it is. Recidivism can be further reduced up to 30 percent with after prison intervention. However, our current policies make no sense; we release many offenders to the public without some form of post-release supervision. Regardless of the program offered, it is very important to measure the effect the program has on recidivism; just because something is evidence-based, there can't be an assumption it works in the new location!Since noone else will step forward, i will. I was convicted of Child Molestation 1 in 1995 at the age of 15. My girlfriend accused me of raping her 7 year old sister. She did this as punishment for having another girl pick me up from her house that morning. Surely she had no idea the effect it would have on my life.Being middle class, we could not afford a lawyer. I had a public defender. With every person involved from my gf to mother, to medics admitting to using leading questions. As well as no physical damage or dna evidence found on the child things looked up for me. There was essentially no real evidence that this crime took place.My public defender spent 5 months working on this case and 6 weeks before trial was sent to adult felony court and I was appointed a brand new defender. She had no experience and 6 weeks to prepare. They judge, a woman, would not give another continuance. My lawyer flopped, missed objections and I lost big time.I spent 6 months in a juvenile prison in a sex offender unit where I was given treatment everyday. i was told i would be high risk because I refused to admit guilt. I was released as low risk and have been so for 21 years.On appeal I was told i could not appeal because the problems in this case were not objected to in a timely fashion by my attorney. It was over.I became an angry young man and started drinking and using marijuana. I was always a soft child, but getting beat up by other prisoners almost daily hardened me fast. I was back in jail for Robbery in 4 months. I served 2.5 years. Which helped me calm down. But it also made me look like a repeat criminal. When in fact I was just reckless and angry and allowed other people to influence my choices.Over the last 21 years I have had 3 Failure to Register as A Sex Offender. I was running from the law! A renegade! NO. I was denied by any and all places to live. Noone would take a sex offender. In 21 years my robbery has come up one time. Its always the other. I cannot get a job. I am fortunate to be a very motivated person and have created numerous businesses for myself. I have been forced to do things that i find unethical to survive. But most were legitimate ventures. I have never had to sell drugs, but have come close many times.My first FTR was because I worked in Idaho for a year, their laws are different. When i left Idaho and registered at home, I was later arrested for not telling Idaho i had left. I didnt know. I paid a lawyer $5000 and he did NOTHING for me.My 2nd FTR was because I was a very successful contractor living in a very expensive neighborhood that would have NEVER allowed a sex offender to rent there. It was me, trying to taste a little freedom. It wasn't near children or anything like that. I just wanted to be normal-ishMy 3rd FTR was because I usually registered at my parents house to avoid the problems of registering. People do find you on the registry. Because I am a large and intimidating person, noone has ever confronted me personally. But they have online, they have published my address, etc. The only place I was never harassed was at home w my parents. Unfortunately, it didn't last forever. They do come and check up on you and eventually learned I was lying. Likely many of you will not understand this, but you have never been in my shoes.I have date women with children, i have friends with children, all my close friends know my story and trust me. When you read this you picture a weird person and think of that as how a sex offender looks. I am actually a tall, attractive white male. I am charming and very intelligent. Time in jail has educated me greatly about how to deal with people. Because you cannot run inside, its either make it work or fight!I have never attempted to live near schools etc. It doesn't even make sense. We have cars, if we want to abduct children it can be done anywhere with a car. The laws are incredibly ignorant and obviously feel good laws.Nearly every woman I have ever dated has found out one way or another about my record. You just cant hide the shit. I married the woman of my dreams. She didn't have any children. So no, I am not looking for victims. We divorced officially yesterday. She was reminded of my history SO MANY TIMES. People would get her phone number from far away states and start demanding to know my whereabouts and threaten her. She got a new job in a different state, in two weeks a co-worker showed her my record and asked if this was infact her husband. She was a nanny when we met and saw how patient and chill i was with kids, she believed I would be a great father. I have a rescued dog who is above and beyond the best trained and behaved dog you will meet. I mean like Lassie. He has been in fashion shows, does therapy work for veterans at the VA, and would do great things with children, but i am not allowed there. The dirty dot com posted a article about me and it had such huge results that I had to leave the state.I lost so many jobs. I created businesses and had my own clients shut me down by telling everyone. The internet has made my life a living hell. Websites aggregate data from all over the internet and put it up for all to read. It is very inaccurate in dates, places, crimes, etc. But people believe it like the word of god. It makes me look 10 times worse than before. Then they circulate the links through social media.If anyone screws me out of work, money, etc. They simply bring up my record and it instantly discredits me and i lose. I have been used, abused, and punished OVER and OVER and OVER. Noone cares. None of you.Facebook has deleted my account when i used my real name.Airbnb recently terminated me after 4 successful years as a host with ZERO problems and fantastic reviews. I made $50,000 this year from them.I love to travel. It was incredibly hard to ever make enough money to travel. but i did it. Then people jealous of me reported me and i have actually been kicked out of Brasil after two successful trips with a total of 4.5 months in the country. No issues, but when i was reported, i was never allowed to leave the airport. Spent 12 hours there and had to fly another 17 hours back home. Lost the flight i paid for too.I have a gf. She has two wonderful children. Her co-worker looked me up in a couple days of us living together and told her about my record. She already knew. I told her everything. So her ex husband decided that, despite refusing to meet me, he would get involved. He started harassing her, he is a control freak and broke her wrist out of anger once. He grew weed in the house, with the children and sold it to random people. But he is not a criminal because he was never caught. He demanded that i leave the house, and that she stop seeing me. When we didn't stop, his girlfriend called CPS on us. CPS came and investigated and closed the case. The officer found no wrong doing or danger. but he did remind my gf over and over that once a sex offender, always a sex offender. I guess he has some kind of evidence that noone else has. Either way, the case was dropped!So the ex filed for full custody of the kids. Starting a very expensive legal battle. Her first attorney told her it was an uphill battle but could be won. Then suddenly changed his tune and told her she was essentially screwed and forced her to sign an agreement that she would never see me again. We found another attorney, another $5000 retainer. And he says he will fight like hell. But I have to do some evaluations. I have to go see people to yet again, prove that I am not a sexual deviant. 21 years later, NO other sexual, child, or female related charges, but I am yet again told to serve another sentence. This will cost at least $10,000. We are still dealing with this now. I do not know what will come of it.Common sense, and the constitution, says that i have served my time. I was release as the lowest risk level. That says that I have been "rehabilitated." But that isn't how it is happening. I am always the one facing the battle. Even though I have now moved out of the house, even my dog isn't allowed there! Wow! I am only there when the kids are not. I am not there giving them baths, helping them change, tucking them in, none of that. However, all my friends with kids in the past have never worried about me around their kids. When you know me, you know.The truth is out there. But it is entirely ignored by emotional citizens and the lawyers who are winning BIG TIME by allowing this to persist. These are just the things i can think of. I feel that I have never been harmed because of my size, my attitude and the pitbull by my side the last 8 years. However, i know the stories. Crazy people kill people like me and get applause.I am treated as guilty as if it happened yesterday by everyone, all the time, in every circumstance. It has hindered my life greatly. Funnily, I have become a very compassionate and empathetic person because of this. It has involved me in so many circles and lifestyles. I have done SO much charity out of understanding that sometimes people just need ANYONE to care.My immense courage and perseverance in the face of constant adversity has made me into the person that you would LOVE to have in your company. I have had cute little shorts written about my resourcefulness. I have a vast and deep understanding of criminals, and their mindset. And I promise, longer sentences, registrations, etc will never have affect on anything except for bank rolling the private prison industry, and the careers of politicians. It has never protected you in any way at all. Nothing would have ever stopped me from reoffending if i was infact of that mind set.This issue remains today. You will not hire me out of fear. You will not give me an apartment out of fear. Fear of hurting someone? No, of course not. Fear of liability!I have been forced to be homeless twice by the system. Even when i was making over 200k in my construction business. I was forced by the system to be homeless for a couple weeks. Today i am technically homeless because of my gf ex husband. He used the threat of the system to kick me out of her home, called cps, and called Airbnb and had me terminated. So today i have no income and no home. I am getting by. The money he pays her in alimony, she pays me to make up for my lost income. But that isn't the life a man wants to live. I want my freedom. That is all i want. I want my freedom to move forward. But you will never give it to me.So when you wonder why people commit crimes, why they repeat, and why they sell drugs, rob your houses, and do all the things they do.... Remember by story. Know that the cumulation of your choices to make our lives nearly impossible have created the results of today.Three differing systems exist in determining offenders' inclusion in the registry: risk-based, sentence-length-based, and offense-based. In risk-based systems, the offender is screened against a scientifically validated screening tool, and determination of inclusion is made according to the results. In sentence-length-based systems, offenders receiving sentences exceeding some determined length are included. In offense-based systems, registration is required when a person is convicted under one of the listed offenses requiring registration.Risk-based registries reflect the determined dangerousness of registered offenders, while sentence-length-based registries reflect the severity of the crime. Offense-based registries reflect neither the dangerousness of registrants, nor the severity of their crimes. UK, Canada, and Australia have adopted either risk-based- or sentence-length-based registry schemes. In the United States, the vast majority of the states are applying offense-based registries, leaving the actual risk level of the offender and severity of the offense uncertain. The few U.S. states applying risk-based systems are pressured by Federal Government to adopt offense-based systems in accordance with Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act. Studies has shown that actuarial risk assessment instruments consistently outperform the offense-based system mandated by federal law.Consequently, the effectiveness of offense-based registries have been questioned by professionals, and evidence exists suggesting that such registries are counterproductive.Virtually no studies exist finding US registries effective, prompting some researchers to call them pointless.-Sex offender registryI am not a perfect person. But i certainly DO NOT deserve this life sentence. Death would have been so much more painless for not only myself, but the dozens of people who have had to suffer with me through many hard times.I often ask myself how others survive! People who are not diligent, strong in the mind, and able to create sources of income on their own. How the hell do they make it?Also, we need to remember one very important fact. Criminals are not convicted because they are criminals. They are convicted because they are poor. Rich people can bail out, lessening the pressure to take deals. They can afford great attorneys who get them off. 90-95% of all criminal cases end up in a plea agreement. This is because the system is made to win.Don't cry for me Quora. Cry for the future victims of people like me who have been cornered and have no other way out other than violence, and theft. I have fought it off for 21 years. I have never had to go and take from you. But the internet has made it harder and laws pass each year making it harder. When i have nowhere else to go, i will go to you and take what you have and probably end up dead, because a bullet to the head is much easier than more jail time.Just for fun, check out the Stanford Prison Experiment:to see how it all really happens. Since most of you think that you would never be like me. Another great resource is John Olivers take on: Mandatory MinimumsPrisonRe-EntryBailMunicipal ViolationsIt is very accurate. I live on the west coast. And its much harder in the south.Happy 2016.