Extension Of Time Claim: Fill & Download for Free

Tapirs have evolved over 50 million years ago. From the time of evolving, they haven't changed much. They among those who called living fossils.There are mainly three species of tapirs found in the wild.The black and white Malay Tapirs. They found in the forest of Malaysia and Sumatra.The new world tapirs found in central and south America. They roaming around the grassland of this continents.The smallest tapirs, the Woolly Tapirs live in high altitudes of Andes mountains. They get their names due to having a thick coat of far.They have a similarly of body shape with an elephant for their extension of the nose which looks like short trunk like an elephant.But they are not in the family of elephants. Around 40 millions years ago the rhinos, horses, zebras are evolved from the old members of tapirs families.Analysis of the fossils of tapirs explores that about 40 million years ago tapirs and rhinos evolved from the same origin.So their actual close relatives belong in today's world are rhinos and horses.The resemble of trunk type body parts which makes them appears close relatives of elephants is the extension of their nose. Tapirs trunk actually is comprised of their upper lips and nose.They evolve this mutation with time. This extension of the nose can do complex operation like the movement of all directions. It helps them to catch the upper portion of trees.Subhasis ✍️Images are taken from different websites and the author doesn't claim any copyright of these images.

To be blunt, the Republican Party doesn’t actually care about immigration, illegal or otherwise. That should be fairly obvious to everyone by now: their purpose in talking about it so much is to get the Democratic Party on the “wrong side” of the issue, in order to win the GOP votes at election time.Donald Trump’s wall, as you’ve obviously noticed, was just an expensive extension of that same approach: appearing to be doing something whilst actually doing nothing. Building a wall doesn’t do a damn thing, particularly since it a) could be climbed over (as was proven several times), b) kept falling over, c) didn’t cover obvious possible points of entry, like the Rio Grande and, as you noted, d) because the vast majority of people staying in the US illegally entered legally and simply overstayed their visas.Now, the way we know that the GOP don’t give a damn about immigration is twofold: firstly, because a fairly large number of Republican businessmen (including Donald Trump) have frequently hired illegal immigrants as a source of cheap labour. Secondly, and here’s the most important part, they could resolve illegal immigration simply by enforcing the current law. If you arrest/fine every American businessman that hires illegals, there’ll be no work for them to take on the US side of the border…and no reason to emigrate illegally.Why don’t they do this? Easy: because, in addition to alienating American businessmen, it would resolve the ‘problem’. The Republicans can’t solve the ‘problem’, because then they lose something that they can use to garner votes. As long as immigration is an electoral issue, they can campaign on it, and use it to get votes.Of course, that’s only part of it. The other part is that they can keep attacking the Democratic Party on the basis of being ‘weak’ on national security, and for letting too many immigrants into the United States, thereby ‘taking jobs from hard-working Americans’ (not that most Americans would care to do the arduous jobs in question for the pathetic wages involved)…you’re familiar with the rhetoric, I’m sure.Trump didn’t do anything about the issue because it was in the Republican Party’s interest that the issue remain unsolved. That’s true of a lot of GOP talking points, I might add. Look at the number of times that the Republicans have claimed that they have the solution…and look how many times they’ve actually resolved an issue. They’ll tell you that they know of the perfect approach, the best solutions ever, but when it comes time to implement them…

Well Kasee Sreenivas has already given a brilliant answer. So, I would like to add only few other things like:Drafting and review of Tender documentContract Formation, Administration and ManagementClaim Settlement and Management- Handling claims from Subcontractors for Extension of Time, Compensation for delays, extra cost etc.and preparing counter claim.Subcontractor's Performance Evaluation.You must have got an idea that I and Mr. Kasi have mentioned some of the same things but from a different perspective. For example, Mr. Kasi is looking for ways to find loophole in the contract document to claim extension of time. I have to deal with those claims. :POn a lighter note, I feel it will be prudent to mention that all the points mentioned by Mr. Kasi are the core functions of a Contracts Engineer. My experience of Contracts is a bit complicated. L&T is the Main Contractor for the Expansion and Modernization of Mumbai Airport. In this role, I am a Contractor to the Client (GVK) and at the same time, I am client for various MEP Subcontractors. Hence, I've added few additional roles of a Contract Engineer.The other roles/responsibilities/skills of a Contract Engineer are:People Management skills- Coordination with different departments within the organisation, client and subcontractors.Convincing skills- Negotiate terms and conditions with client and subcontractors.Must be good at interpreting Contractual terms. Well that's important as with the same document and witness, one court gives 5 years of sentence to Salman Khan while the other sets him free.Interpersonal skills- to maintain good relation with one and all.Tracking and Monitoring of change in scope of works.Contracts Management is a lucrative and challenging career option. Feel free to reach me for any guidance or clarification.