Affidavit Of No Renovation: Fill & Download for Free

The question has to be, how did Kasaragod became part of Kerala?Before the formation of Kerala, Kasaragod was a part of South Canara district of erstwhile Madras Presidency. Kasaragod became part of Kannur district following the reorganisation of states and formation of Kerala in 1 November 1956.Kasaragod was declared a district in the year 1984. Inclusion of Kasargod with Kerala has been a contentious issue as there is a sizeable population which speaks Kannada and Tulu. But it is noted that as per 2011 census report only 4.2% people in the district speak Kannada as their mother tongue.HistoryKasaragod was known to the Arabs by the name Harkwillia. Many Arab travelers visiting Kerala between the 9th and the 14th centuries visited Kasaragod, being an important trade centre then.Kasaragod was part of the Kumbala Kingdom with 64 Malayalam and Tulu villages. The Vijayanagara empire attacked and annexed Kasaragod from the Kolathiri Raja with Nileshwaram as one of the capital. During the decline of the Vijayanagara empire, the administration of this area was vested with Ikkeri Nayakas.At the onset of collapse of the Vijayanagara empire, Venkappa Nayaka declared independence to Ikkery. Kumbla, Chandragiri and Bekal are considered to be the chain of forts constructed or renovated by Shivappa Nayaka.The region south of Chandragiri river was part of Kolathunadu and towards the north was traditionally called as Tulunadu from 14th century AD and before that it was north of Kumbala.[1]DemographicsTalukas of Kasaragod districtAccording to Madras affidavit of 1951,The entire Kasaragod Taluk (now Kasaragod district) was as follows:Malayalam - 72%Tulu - 14.2%Kannada - 6.3%Others - 7.5%The percentage in the area lying north of Chandragiri river were:Malayalam - 51.74%Tulu - 26.4%Kannada - 9.5%The demographics of Kasaragod town was as follows:Malayalam - 64%Tulu - 12.7%Kannada - 11.4%The region south of Chandragiri river had;Malayalam - 90.21%Tulu - 3.32%Kannada - 3.88%Hosdurg town (now under Kanhangad municipality) had;Malayalam - 80.08%Tulu - 1.3%Kannada - 10.7%So it merged with Kerala in 1956 according to Mahajan commission report. After state reorganisation many Kannadigas and Tuluvas have migrated to Karnataka. So the population will be much lesser than this.And according to census report of 2011, the demographics of Kasaragod district is 82.7% Malayalam 8.8% Tulu 4.2% Kannada 1.8% Marathi 2.5% Others.So it'll never merge with Karnataka as it's a Malayalam majority district.But Kannada script is prevalent in Kasaragod town and further north along with Malayalam due to the presence of significant minorities like Tuluvas, Konkani, Kannadigas and Marathas. Because they're using Kannada as their medium of instruction. There are many Kannada medium schools in the border areas and their linguistic rights are preserved. And that gives a wrong impression for the Kannadigas that Kannada is majority language in Kasaragod and Manjeshwaram taluks. But the case in other side of border is not as smooth as here. Malayalam medium schools are virtually non existent in Kodagu district despite Malayalees form second largest ethnic group (26%) after Kannadigas.For more info, check the link below. Refer to Page no. 131 and 132 (Table 4.1).[2]Footnotes[1] http://Kasaragod district[2] http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in › 12PDF Web results CHAPTER IV LINGUISTIC TUSSLES IN KASARAGOD The ... - Shodhganga

Contrary to what Terry Lambert and Martha Artyomenko say, there is no way to avoid a lawsuit based on some procedure or technicality you come up with. The only way to truly avoid a lawsuit is to hope that the tenant does not institute an action.For example, claiming renovation or just noticing them to quit the premises doesn’t magically bypass the Fourth Amendment (“due process clause”). The tenant can challenge the notice to quit by instituting legal proceedings, and force you to demonstrate that your notice is within the boundaries of the law.In Nevada, the landlord can post a notice on a door to require the tenant to quit the premises, but the tenant can simply go to the local Justice Court and file an Affidavit of Tenant. This blocks the landlord’s notice from going into effect unless the landlord sets a hearing at the Justice Court, at which point the tenant can appear and defend himself. The Justice of the Peace will render a decision.

It would be the plaintiff’s duty to prove to the court that you had been served notice of the lawsuit (the proverbial “YOU ARE SUED!” document a constable or process server delivers). If you have no attorney, and you have never received notice, then you would have a point of law to bring up with the judge.The only reason I say if you have no attorney is because sometimes attorneys accept these on behalf of their clients.Depending on what level of court you are in, you may need an attorney, or you may not. — You can examine the court record (at the Office of the Clerk of the Court), which was produced during the process of default judgment being found against you, and look for the alleged proof that you were served, in accordance with the law, that you were being sued, who was suing you, in what court you were being sued, and when you needed to be there to contest the lawsuit.Default judgments, of course, are often issued by judges when a case is called and one party to the case (Plaintiff or Defendant) is not present in court. When that happens, the party that is present wins by default — hence the name.At least take that first look. What affidavit of process service was presented to prove you were served notice of the case against you? — If you, on your own, can find what this alleged proof of service was, then is it correct? Had you forgotten something?If you forgot, and the proof of service affidavit is correct, then you will need to see an attorney to see if you can overcome this problem, as a matter of law.If the affidavit is defective, or fraudulent, or false, or you’re not the person described by the affidavit (e.g., “You are not the person who was being sued), then you can make a motion to the court to reconsider the default judgment, for whatever reason.As I usually say, whether you need an attorney depends on whether the other party has an attorney. — Two attorney-less parties arguing in Small Claims Court is usually fine (think: Judge Judy). But, the scale tips in favor of your opponent when he/she/it has an attorney and you don’t. The same is true when you try to argue matters of law in front of higher county courts, or district courts, or federal courts, etc. — The identifying factor, there, usually is that the judge of those courts is an attorney, too.So, you can still remember the “If there’s an attorney, I almost always need one myself” adage. — Even if the attorney is the judge.And, remember, this is just a first step. — To be sued, you have to be served. If you were never served, then you could never have had a court date, which means a judge could never have been sitting and writing out a default judgment.There may be exceptions to that idea, but it’s probably likely that the exceptions disappear when you contest the judgment on these grounds. There may be rules for expediency that render default judgments more “automatic” in certain situations, but if you say you were never served, and the Plaintiff’s proof of service is not very compelling, then I’m sure the judge would accept a Motion to Reconsider and set a new trial date.Whether you actually have to go to trial, if you are not the person involved in the lawsuit, probably is unlikely, especially if you have an attorney making motions on your behalf. Since I’m not an attorney, I wouldn’t know which motions those would be. That said, I’m certain an attorney would, and that they exist.