Directions As Described In Exhibit A, Section Iii: Fill & Download for Free

I had to find the Senate’s “Rules of Procedure and Practice in the Senate When Sitting on Impeachment Trials” to have confidence in my response to your thought-provoking query. These were enacted in 1986, but I can’t find any indication that they have been repealed or amended, so I’m going with the text available to be downloaded without charge at https://www.law.cornell.edu/background/impeach/senaterules.pdf. I mention the site because these Rules are too long to paste in full into this response.I wanted to add some standard rules of statutory construction here at the beginning of the text rather than inserting them as they occur in order to avoid disrupting the flow of the Rules’ texts. What follows is the literal text of Rules 100 through 103, inclusive, and does not include the full text of every one of the impeachment Rules. Those may be read by a download from the website I have noted above. I have included, however, all of the Rules that directly bear on the answer to your question. Based on its own Rules, the Senate is required to act within a specific time frame on any articles of impeachment delivered to it from the House, as stated below.Note: To avoid confusion, I want to emphasize that these Rules only become applicable when articles of impeachment are voted upon by the necessary numbers of members of the House – not just when articles requesting impeachment are enrolled in the House. The references here to articles means that the House has not only accepted a proposed set of articles of impeachment from a member or members; it has held the requisite hearings and votes so that, upon delivery, the Senate must take up its duties in regard to a trial of the person.First, the word “shall” is always construed as meaning the described action is mandatory, not discretionary. Second, important bills and articles are actually physically delivered by one House of Congress to the other, and the “managers” referred to in the text need not be elected representatives, although I suppose they could be. The term is used to refer to staffers who are charged by a House of Congress to carry out certain tasks – here the (probably) physical delivery of the articles of impeachment from the House to the Senate.Note: The Rules are numbered beginning with “100”. There is no section before 100 as a result. I have occasionally added text just for clarity. My additions are bracketed [ ] and are not part of the official text of the Rule.With these glosses on the text:“[Rule 100] I.“Whensoever the Senate shall receive notice from the House of Representatives that managers are appointed on their part to conduct an impeachment against any person and are directed to carry articles of impeachment to the Senate, [to be physically delivered to] the Secretary of the Senate shall immediately inform the House of Representatives that the Senate is ready to receive the managers for the purpose of exhibiting such articles of impeachment, agreeably to such notice. [Note how formal all this is, modeled after the English example of delivering bills of attainder and execution to the House of Lords.][Rule 101] II. When the managers of an impeachment shall be introduced at the bar of the Senate [presumably by the Secretary of the Senate, although this is not specified] and shall signify that they are ready to exhibit articles of impeachment against any person, the Presiding Officer of the Senate shall direct the Sergeant at Arms to make proclamation, who shall, after making proclamation, repeat the following words, viz: ‘‘All persons are commanded to keep silence, on pain of imprisonment, while the House of Representatives is exhibiting to the Senate of the United States articles of impeachment against ——— ———’’; after which the articles shall be exhibited, and then the Presiding Officer of the Senate shall inform the managers that the Senate will take proper order on the subject of the impeachment, of which due notice shall be given to the House of Representatives.[Rule 102] III. Upon such articles being presented to the Senate, the Senate [note the imperative here] shall, at 1 o’clock afternoon of the day (Sunday excepted) following such presentation, or sooner if ordered by the Senate, proceed to the consideration of such articles and shall continue in session from day to day (Sundays excepted) after the trial shall commence (unless otherwise ordered by the Senate) until final judgment shall be rendered, and so much longer as may, in its judgment, be needful. Before proceeding to the consideration of the articles of impeachment, the Presiding Officer shall administer the oath hereinafter provided to the members of the Senate then present and to the other members of the Senate as they shall appear, whose duty it shall be to take the same.[Rule 103] IV. When the President of the United States or the Vice President of the United States, upon whom the powers and duties of the Office of President shall have devolved, shall be impeached, the Chief Justice of the United States shall preside; and in a case requiring the said Chief Justice to preside notice shall be given to him by the Presiding Officer of the Senate of the time and place fixed for the consideration of the articles of impeachment, as aforesaid, with a request to attend; and the said Chief Justice shall be administered the oath by the Presiding Officer of the Senate and shall preside over the Senate during the consideration of said articles and upon the trial of the person impeached therein.”

Hostility is a strong word.Many of us do not feel any hostility or resentment against North Africans.It is really a pity that many light/pale skinned North Africans tend to equate black skin with slaveness because of the legacy of black slavery in North Africa.They tend to downplay on purpose the extent and impact of white slavery in North Africa (the Mameluks, the Janissaries, the Saqaliba, the Barbary slaves, the Morean slaves, the Punic slaves were all white slaves on African soil).In addition, there is a color line in all North African countries, the paler, the better. Even the indigenous North Africans who are dark/black skinned suffer many forms of discrimination.Yes, there are black skinned populations in all North African countries and they are indigenous people and they are the earliest inhabitants of the land. They mostly live in southern regions, rural areas and as isolated communities in the north and center. The Tebu of Libya, the Korandje speakers of Algeria, the Nubians of Egypt and the Drawa of Morocco are North African Blacks.There is pictoral, mosaic, archeological and documentary evidence that the earliest inhabitants of North Africa were not pale nor light skinned. Actually they were called Ethiopians or Moors because of their skin color: black. The written word of ancient times is crystal clear.As somone put it : This idea of ancient North Africans being anything and everything but black cannot be found among ancient writers, travelers and traders. It is a uniquely modern phenomenon.The opinions of Sir Henry Rawlinson are reinforced by the researches of his equally distinguished brother, Professor George Rawlinson, in his essay On the Ethnic Affinities of the Races of Western Asia, which directs our attention to: "the uniform voice of primitive antiquity, which spoke of the Ethiopians as a single race, dwelling along the shores of the Southern Ocean from India to the Pillars of Hercules [Straits of Gibraltar]." (Herodotus, Vol. I., Book. I., Appendix, Essay XI., Section-5.).https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2017/03/210206/history-viking-adventure-morocco/History: The Viking Adventure In Moroccohttps://www.caitlingreen.org/2015/09/a-great-host-of-captives.htmlThe king of the Mauritanians escaped from the camp and fled in the night after his hand had been cut off. When the morning came, the Norwegians seized their weapons and readied themselves firmly and bravely for the battle. The Mauritanians, however, when they noticed that their king had departed, fled after they had been terribly slain. Thereupon the Norwegians swept across the country, and they devastated and burned the whole land. Then they brought a great host of them captive with them to Ireland, i.e. those are the black men [literally 'blue men' but with the sense 'black', see further here]. For Mauri is the same as nigri; 'Mauritania' is the same as nigritudo. Hardly one in three of the Norwegians escaped, between those who were slain, and those who drowned in the Gaditanian Straits. Now those black men remained in Ireland for a long time. Mauritania is located across from the Balearic Islands. (J. N. Radner (ed. & trans.), Fragmentary Annals of Ireland (Dublin, 1978), FA 330, pp. 120–1)"The men of Egypt are mostly black or brown with a skinny desiccated look"... -Ammianus Marcellinus, 325-330 A.D. (Book 22)On the remains of the Phoenicians and Carthaginians: "The Phoenicians had nothing in common with the official Jewish type: brachycephal, aquiline or Hittite nose, and so on [...] skulls presumably Phoenician, have been found west of Syracuse [...] but these skulls are dolichocephalic and proganthous, with Negroid affinities""Other bones discovered in Punic Carthage, and housed in the Lavigerie Museum, come from personages found in special sarcophagi and probably belonging to the Carthaginian elite. Almost all the skulls are dolichocephalic." - Eugene Pittard "Les races et L' histoire.""The anthropological examination of skeletons found in tombs in Carthage proves that there is no racial unity [...] The so called Semitic type, characterized by the long, perfectly oval face, the thin aquiline nose and the lengthened cranium, enlarged over the nape of the neck has not been found in Carthage. On the other hand, another cranial form, with a fairly short face, prominent parietal bumps, farther forward and lower down than is usual is common [...] most of the Punic population in Carthage had African and even Negro ancestors" - Charles Picard "Daily Life in Carthage at the time of Hannibal"Adolph Bloch said, in a presentation to the French Anthropology Society in 1896, entitled “Sur des races noires indigènes qui existaient anciennement dans l’afrique septentrionale” (On native black races which existed formerly in northern Africa): "The race which gave birth to the Moroccans can be no other than the African negroes because the same black type [...] is found all the way to Senegal upon the right bank of the river without counting that it has been recognized in various parts of the Sahara [...] and from there comes black Moors who still have thick lips as a result of negro descent and not from intermixture [...] As to the white, bronze, or dark Moors, they are no other than the near relations of black Moors with whom they form the varieties of the same race; and as one can also see among the Europeans, blondes, brunettes, and chestnuts, in the midst of the same population so one may see Moroccans of every color in the same agglomeration without it being a question of their being real mulattos."LacusCurtius • Diodorus SiculusBook III (beginning)Diodorus of Sicily wrote the following :They say also that the Egyptians are colonists sent out by the Ethiopians, Osiris having been the leader of the colony. And the larger part of the customs of the Egyptians are, they hold, Ethiopian.According to Herodotus, in Histories, Book II, the Colchians were Egyptians “because like the Egyptians they had black skin and wooly hair.”Herodotus Book IIChapter 104[1] For it is plain to see that the Colchians are Egyptians; and what I say, I myself noted before I heard it from others. When it occurred to me, I inquired of both peoples; and the Colchians remembered the Egyptians better than the Egyptians remembered the Colchians;[2] the Egyptians said that they considered the Colchians part of Sesostris’ army. I myself guessed it, partly because they are black-skinned and woolly-haired; though that indeed counts for nothing, since other peoples are, too; but my better proof was that the Colchians and Egyptians and Ethiopians are the only nations that have from the first practised circumcision.Caucasus | region and mountains, EurasiaThe peoples of the region have exhibited an extraordinary ethnic and cultural diversity since early times: the Colchians, for example, as described in the 5th century BCE by the Greek historian Herodotus, were black-skinned Egyptians, though their true origin remains unclear.Aristotle, Greek philosopher, scientist, and tutor to Alexander the Great. Aristotle is said to have written 150 philosophical treatises.Aristotle says in Physiognomonica that “the Egyptians and Ethiopians are very black.”"Too black a hue marks the coward as witness Egyptians and Ethiopians and so does also too white a complexion as you may see from women, the complexion of courage is between the two." (Physiognomics, Vol. VI, 812a)Aristotle makes reference to the hair form of Egyptians and Ethiopians: "Why are the Ethiopians and Egyptians bandy-legged? Is it because the bodies of living creatures become distorted by heat, like logs of wood when they become dry? The condition of their hair supports this theory; for it is curlier than that of other nations, and curliness is as it were crookedness of the hair." (Physiognomics, Book XIV, p. 317Isidore of Seville makes it rather clear in his book etymologies that moor is the equivalent of black. In the medieval era, in Europe moor simply meant negro.Isidore of Seville wrote “The Moors have bodies black as night, while the skin of the Gauls is white..."in The Etymologies of Isidore of Seville, translation by Steven A. Barney, published 2007. p. 386. St. Isidore also “underlines the fact that Moors are so named because they are black, and their blackness comes from the heat of the sun." St. Isidore (9.2.121-23)” (Ramey, L., Monstrous Alterity in Early Modern Travel Accounts. Esprit Createur, (48)1, pp. 81-952008).What happened then ?North Africans were known as Ethiopians in ancient times; they are today categorized as near Whites or Caucasians. The vast majority of them are light/pale skinned.This is since the colonization of North Africa by the Ottoman Empire that this region of Africa has suffered 400 years of interbreeding with European white populations slaves (Circassian , Bulgarian , Turkish , Greek , Sicilian , etc. . ) .Arab emirs under the influence of the behaviors of their Ottoman overlords (Turkish ), hence white men, liked to take wives and concubines women slaves from Europe . These are the famous odalisque found in oriental harems.Armed forces and domestic workforce of the Maghreb countries consisted largely of European white slaves kidnapped, rounded up during raids and piracy carried throughout southern Europe.This is the period of " Barbary slavery periodThere have been massive population transfers of native Europeans into the Maghreb over the past five hundred years--not just from the slave trade there, but also the mass expulsion of the Moors from Spain.Last but not least, the extensive European maternal ancestry of Berbers has yet to be explained. Even Central Tuareg have minor to moderate female euro-genes.How did it happen that countless Europan women found themselves the breeding partners of North African men on African soil ?Human Alu insertion polymorphisms in North African populations (2011 DNA study)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22146064Taken together, results on Y chromosome, mtDNA and Alu Insertions in North Africa allow to propose a scenario for this region.The ancient “sub-Saharan” settlement would have been followed by admixture with Iberian populations.But, as the North African Y chromosome remained dominant in the region, we could argue that this admixture has been realized in one direction: north African men and Eurasian womenexplaining the gene flow from Europe and high frequency of European types of mtDNA in North Africa as compared with Y chromosome.This situation would not be the result of drift toward Eurasian mtDNA.Our results on Alu insertions interestingly confirm that this gene flow happened several times probably always on the same direction.These matrimonial exchanges between North Africa and Europe should be considered in a context of patriarchal societies with men attached to territory and women from different regions including Europe.hence, genetic diversity on one hand and relationship with Europe should have been due to women

Africa: Academic Racism, Racist Construct and RebellionSub-Saharan Africa is a Racist Colonial ConstructionThe committee also chose a continent-based approach, which considers Africa as a whole and abandons the usual dichotomy between North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa – UNESCO, Decolonizing HistorySub-Saharan Africa is a linguistic vestige of racist colonialism, nested in the notion of divide and rule, which articulates a perception based on European terms of homogeneity.The notion of some invisible border, which divides the North of African from the South, is rooted in racism, which in part assumes that sand is an obstacle for African language and culture.This band of sand hence confines Africans to the bottom of a European imposed location, which exists neither linguistically (Afro-Asiatic languages), ethnically (Tuareg ), politically (African Union, Arab league), Economically (CEN-SAD) or physically (Sudan and Chad).The over emphasis on sand as a defining feature in African history is grossly misleading as cultures, trade, and languages do not stop when they meet geographic deserts. Thus Sub-Africa is another divisive vestige of colonial domination which balkanized Africa assigning everything below the “waist belt” of Africa as negative.As someone put it :-"Black" Africa aka sub-Saharan African versus "White" aka Mediterranean Africa in a lame attempt to hide this irrefutable fact: the River Nile overflows into the Mediterranean Sea... just like black skinned Africans bearing e1b1b hg did, which destroys the delusions of racial purity of Mediterranean people, the originators of the Western civilization.Uniparental Markers of Contemporary Italian Population Reveals Details on Its Pre-Roman HeritageMediterranean people have an average of 7.1% of black ancestry. Italians have a slightly higher black ancestry on average."This analysis indicated that Italians have a basal proportion of "sub-Saharan" ancestry that is higher (9.2%, on average) than other central or northern European populations (1.5%, on average).The amount of African ancestry in Italians is however more comparable to (but slightly higher than) the average in other Mediterranean countries (7.1%)" ( Published: December 10, 2012DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050794 )-------The accretion of a small amount of Negroid blood by the Mediterranean stock causes a frizziness of hair form; a darkening of skin color, which becomes extremely variable; a broadening of the nasal breadth; an increase in interorbital and biorbital dimensions; and often an increase in facial and nasal lengths, as well as a tendency to nasal profile convexity. Vault dimensions and body dimensions change little. - Carleton Coon S. Ph.DMediterranean Proper (hereafter meant when the word "Mediterranean" is used alone): Short-statured, dolicho- and mesocephalic form found in Spain, Portugal, the western Mediterranean islands, and to some extent in North Africa, southern Italy, and other Mediterranean borderlands. [...] often carries a slight negroid tendency. - Carleton Coon S., Ph.D------The renowned French Ethnologist Dr. Paul Rivet, used to say: ‘there is a ratio of 4 to 18 per cent black blood around the Mediterranean Sea’. He thus referred to the Negroids of the early Paleolithic and Mesolithic - Grimaldi Man and Caspian Man -- an important group of the Mediterranean populations until the NeolithicHaplogroup E1b1b (Y-DNA)Outside Europe, E1b1b is found at high frequencies in Morocco (over 80%), Somalia (80%), Ethiopia (40% to 80%), Tunisia (70%), Algeria (60%), Egypt (40%), Jordan (25%), Palestine (20%), and Lebanon (17.5%). On the European continent it has the highest concentration in Kosovo (over 45%), Albania and Montenegro (both 27%), Bulgaria (23%), Macedonia and Greece (both 21%), Cyprus (20%), Sicily (20%), South Italy (18.5%), Serbia (18%) and Romania (15%). Ashkenazi Jews have approximately 20% of E1b1b, which falls mostly under specific clades of E-M123.Red Sea origins & Neolithic expansionHaplogroup E1b1b (formerly known as E3b) represents the last major direct migration from Africa into Europe. It is believed to have first appeared in the Horn of Africa approximately 26,000 years ago and dispersed to North Africa and the Near East during the late Paleolithic and Mesolithic periods. E-M78 and E-Z827 originated respectively at 20,000 years and 24,000 years. E1b1b lineages are closely linked to the diffusion of Afroasiatic languages.Distribution of haplogroup E1b1b in Europe, the Near East and North AfricaRed Sea origins & Neolithic expansionHaplogroup E1b1b (formerly known as E3b) represents the last major direct migration from Africa into Europe. It is believed to have first appeared in the Horn of Africa approximately 26,000 years ago and dispersed to North Africa and the Near East during the late Paleolithic and Mesolithic periods. E-M78 and E-Z827 originated respectively at 20,000 years and 24,000 years. E1b1b lineages are closely linked to the diffusion of Afroasiatic languages.Someone wrote that this idea of ancient North Africans being anything and everything but black cannot be found among ancient writers and commentators. It is a uniquely modern phenomenon. I co-signed 100%The opinions of Sir Henry Rawlinson are reinforced by the researches of his equally distinguished brother, Professor George Rawlinson, in his essay On the Ethnic Affinities of the Races of Western Asia, which directs our attention to: "the uniform voice of primitive antiquity, which spoke of the Ethiopians as a single race, dwelling along the shores of the Southern Ocean from India to the Pillars of Hercules [Strait of Gibraltar]." (Herodotus, Vol. I., Book. I., Appendix, Essay XI., Section-5.)Ibn Khaldun whose family was from Andalusia also gave a telling explanation of why some people of his time believed Berbers had come to possess the black complexions they did.He writes, “Ham, having become black because of a curse pronounced against him by his father, fled to the Maghrib to hide in shame.... Berber, son of Kesloudjim [Casluhim], one of his descendants, left numerous posterity in the Maghrib” (Smith, R. (2003). “What happened to the ancient Libyans? Chasing sources across the Sahara from Herodotus to Ibn Khaldun,” Journal of World History 14:4, p. 482).————————— LacusCurtius • Diodorus SiculusBook III (beginning)Diodorus of Sicily wrote the following :They say also that the Egyptians are colonists sent out by the Ethiopians, Osiris having been the leader of the colony. And the larger part of the customs of the Egyptians are, they hold, Ethiopian.According to Herodotus, in Histories, Book II, the Colchians were Egyptians “because like the Egyptians they had black skin and wooly hair.”Aristotle says in Physiognomonica that “the Egyptians and Ethiopians are very black.”Herodotus Book IIChapter 104[1] For it is plain to see that the Colchians are Egyptians; and what I say, I myself noted before I heard it from others. When it occurred to me, I inquired of both peoples; and the Colchians remembered the Egyptians better than the Egyptians remembered the Colchians;[2] the Egyptians said that they considered the Colchians part of Sesostris’ army. I myself guessed it, partly because they are black-skinned and woolly-haired; though that indeed counts for nothing, since other peoples are, too; but my better proof was that the Colchians and Egyptians and Ethiopians are the only nations that have from the first practised circumcision.Caucasus | region and mountains, EurasiaThe peoples of the region have exhibited an extraordinary ethnic and cultural diversity since early times: the Colchians, for example, as described in the 5th century BCE by the Greek historian Herodotus, were black-skinned Egyptians, though their true origin remains unclear.Aristotle, Greek philosopher, scientist, and tutor to Alexander the Great. Aristotle is said to have written 150 philosophical treatises."Too black a hue marks the coward as witness Egyptians and Ethiopians and so does also too white a complexion as you may see from women, the complexion of courage is between the two." (Physiognomics, Vol. VI, 812a)Aristotle makes reference to the hair form of Egyptians and Ethiopians: "Why are the Ethiopians and Egyptians bandy-legged? Is it because the bodies of living creatures become distorted by heat, like logs of wood when they become dry? The condition of their hair supports this theory; for it is curlier than that of other nations, and curliness is as it were crookedness of the hair." (Physiognomics, Book XIV, p. 317Isidore of Seville wrote “The Moors have bodies black as night, while the skin of the Gauls is white..."in The Etymologies of Isidore of Seville, translation by Steven A. Barney, published 2007. p. 386. St. Isidore also “underlines the fact that Moors are so named because they are black, and their blackness comes from the heat of the sun." St. Isidore (9.2.121-23)” (Ramey, L., Monstrous Alterity in Early Modern Travel Accounts. Esprit Createur, (48)1, pp. 81-952008).Liber VIII - The Etymologies of Isidore of SevilleIn Isidore’s day, Moors were black by definition…” (Staying Roman: Conquest and identity in Africa and the Mediterranean, 439-700. Jonathan Conant, 2012 Cambridge University PressTravels of Sir John Mandeville (Travels of Sir John Mandeville)Sir Jean Mandeville, wrote that: "and men of Nubia be Christian, but they be black as the Moors for great heat of the sun"Dieu, l'homme et la parole, ou La langue primitive / par J. Azaïs, père.... [Précédé d'une Notice biographique / par A. Durand]Dieu, l'homme et la parole, ou La langue primitive par J. Azaïs, père(1778-1856)MAURE, nom d'un peuple dont la peau est noire (name of a people whose skin is black) ; morou languedocien, mourou provençal, maurus lalin, mor, moren langue romane, morien vieux français, moro catalan, moro espagnol, mouro portugais, moro italien, maour, mauryan bas-breton, mohr allemand, moor anglais, moor hollandais, mohr danois, mor suédois, mour, maar, brûler, hébreu.Le More est noir, c'est-à dire de la couleur d'une chose brûlée.Mauretania (Mauritania)Mauretania, or Maurusia, as it was called by Greek writers, unquestionably signified the land of the Mauri, a term still retained in the modern name of Moors, and probably meaning originally nothing but black men.Internet History SourcebooksAnd I have heard this man say that beyond the country which he ruled there was no habitation of men, but desert land extending to a great distance, and that beyond that there are men, not black skinned like the Mauretanii, but very white in body and fair-haired.In the etymological dictionary of the French language by "Gilles Ménage" (xvii century) More is defined as black or blackish man.About the Moors of Spain we read in the same dictionary, we have called Moors or Moorish Arabs who conquered Spain because they came from Mauritania, that is to say the land of black or blackish men