Beaumont Direct Deposit: Fill & Download for Free

As others have already said, most were filled in as farming returned to the region. Some were left as memorials like the Beaumont-Hamel Newfoundland Memorial in Beaumont France:Some have been restored for historical reasons and are used in movie productions like this one at Massiges. You can view some great images at Champagne: WW1 Trenches at MassigesWhen I toured the Verdun area in the 1980s I was struck by the devastation still visible in the woods all around the area. Clearly not wooded during the battle, the trees had grown up subsequently in the most crater-pocked ground I’ve ever seen. As far as you could see in the woods surrounding the area was artillery crater after artillery crater. As we approached the area and I first started seeing them, I wondered how the ground had gotten so uneven until I realized what I was looking at. If any trenches had existed in those woods during the battle of Verdun I’m not sure any person could have survived because none of the trenches survived.There was at least one trench that was filled in during the battle of Verdun by rocks and dirt from exploding Artillery shells. Unfortunately, there were French soldiers in the trench at the time who were buried alive in the debris. After the battle, a strip of land was discovered with rifle barrels with fixed bayonets sticking up out of the ground. They began digging and unearthed the men, French Soldiers, still clutching their rifles and made the decision to re-bury them. Then they built a memorial over the entire trench area. It’s known as the Trench of Bayonets and is both a graveyard and a memorial.The only story I’ve found explaining it is this:“Two battalions of the 137th Infantry Regiment, deployed at the front since the 10th of June, were the object of appalling shelling and very soon found themselves cut off. The regiment's third company had lost 94 of its 164 men by the night of the 11th. The remainder had been placed in a row of exposed trenches directly observable by German artillery spotters. The artillery fire on the position increased in the early morning hours and the remainder of 137th Regiment was annihilated almost to a man.”Author Alistair Horne tells what subsequently transpired:“It was not until after the war that French teams exploring the battlefield provided a clue as to the fate of 3 Company. The trench it had occupied was discovered completely filled in, but from a part of it at regular intervals protruded rifles, with bayonets still fixed to their twisted and rusty muzzles, On excavation, a corpse was found beneath each rifle. From that plus the testimony of survivors from nearby units, it was deduced that 3 Company had placed its rifles on the parapet ready to repel any attack and — rather than abandon their trench — had been buried alive to a man there by the German bombardment. When the story of the Tranchée des Baionnettes was told it caught the world's imagination."As remains of soldiers from all sides were and continue to be discovered in the Verdun battlefield area at least, they are deposited under the floor of the Douaumont Ossuary at Verdun.The ossuary has windows installed all around the base of the structure allowing visitors to view the bones recovered over the years. There’s no way to identify any of the individuals or their national affiliation.Walking around the ossuary, you get a sense for the real human drama that happened during this fairly short period, and an eerie sense of the devastation seems to linger still.

It shouldn’t.I used to have a very devout muslim family living as neighbours directly across the street. I live in Ireland, where muslims are a very, very tiny minority of the population, less than 1% - but back then (30 years ago) there were virtually none here.The guy was a medical consultant from Sudan, who had a 4-year contract in one of our hospitals. They ended up keeping him about ten years or more, as his skills were very specialist, and my understanding is that he was very good at what he did.Despite being very devout muslims - and with no mosques here they set up a little prayer room in their house - they always wished us “Happy Christmas”. I knew not the first thing about their religion, or what “holy days” they have. And I’ve forgotten now what he told me - but when it came round to whatever date it was, I made a point of wishing them “Happy…” whatever.I have travelled extensively in the middle east and far east and am well aware that in many of their countries, there are major days for Eid, hannuka, and gawd knows what else.If I lived there, and one of the locals wished me “Happy XYZ” when the day came about, I would ALWAYS take it as a compliment and wish them the same.There are several things in life I detest, with every fibre in my body; and anyone who reads me here on quora will see this as a constantly recurring theme:Ignorant bigots trying to ram extremist or racist or anti-freedom political nonsense down other peoples’ throats.Conspiracy theorists and their anti-education, anti-fact and anti-science delusions. I would happily round ’em all up and deposit them on Mars to play with their lizard masters.Crackpot religious fundamentalists, be they deluded, uneducated “creationists”, muslim beheaders, cult members who knock people’s doors at 7 a.m., or those who scream and get their knickers in a twist about “blasphemy” or “apostasy”.The last would include all who try to ram their brain-dead, fact-free religious ideas down people’s throats, insisting that everyone follows them as the “only truth”.Now, SOME of the latter, I am told (though we don’t really have them in this country) will make a point of wishing people they think are non-Christians “Happy CHRISTMAS” just to annoy them. But they would find other ways to annoy such people anyway, if they didn’t or couldn’t say that.So: my long-winded point is this.DESPITE all of the above, to substitute the ghastly American “Haapy Haaalidaze” for “Happy Christmas” is plain crass. Anyone who seeks ways to take offence at this is JUST. PLAIN. WRONG.And no, I’m not a ranting raving evangelist Christian type - read my many posts on the subject! I deal in FACT, not fantasy.So, for ONCE, I will say to all here, “Happy Christmas” for tomorrow, though personally, I will not be attending any service - I will be eating chocolates. The point is, I wish people well - although, I would have to introduce a bit of Chrtstmas Grinch in saying that if anyone feels “offended” by me saying “Happy Christmas”, tough luck.I will not be wishing ANYONE “Haapy Haaalidays”; not today, not tomorrow and not ever.And if a jew or a muslim or anyone else some day wishes me a “Happy” whatever-they’re-having-themselves, I will return the compliment to them (as it is, after all, as a RELIGIOUS thing, TOTALLY MEANINGLESS to me! Can people not SEE that?).

One place to start is with: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Headquarters WebsiteProject InformationThe USACE “has 12,000 miles of commercial inland waterways, 197 lock sites/241 chambers, and 13,000 miles of coastal channels at 926 coastal and Great Lakes ports that move freight and 14,500 miles of levee systems that reduce risk from floods.”So their dredging operations are extensive,[1] frequent and costly.[2]They let contracts, for example:A New Jersey dredging company was busy Friday deepening New York Harbor for the impending arrival of the Navy hospital ship USNS Comfort.Donjon Marine was busy moving crew members and supplies in and out of Manhattan on shuttle boats from Jersey City to clear the way for the converted super tanker with a 33-year history of providing global medical support, officials announced.NY Harbor dredging underway to clear smooth arrival of USNS Comfort for its arrival in Manhattan next week. By LARRY MCSHANE. NEW YORK DAILY NEWS. MAR 27, 2020 AT 3:34 PM.Politico reports about the 2020 stimulus package:[3]“Harbor dredging helpSpecial deal: The deal includes language making it easier for Congress to dole out money for harbor dredging by exempting from discretionary spending caps the Army Corps of Engineers funding provided through the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund. The provision is a boon for ports that need dredging work, like the one in Mobile, Ala., in Senate Appropriations Chairman Richard Shelby's (R-Ala.) home state.How they got it: Prominent backers of the push include Shelby and House Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.). Shelby has fought repeatedly with his own party over the issue. One Republican aide called the decision “an easy give to Shelby, since he’s been wanting it for years and now why not give it to him?”Who got special deals in the stimulus and why they got themThe Congressional Research Service reports[4] reveal:“Such dredging is funded by the HMTF, but the tax rebates are paid for by the general fund. Half of the amounts are provided to donor ports, and half are http://equallydistributedtostateswithenergytransferports. As identified by the Corps, these ports are:√ donor ports: Los Angeles, Long Beach, Miami, New York/New Jersey, Seattle, Tacoma;√ medium-sized donor ports: PortEverglades, Port Hueneme, San Diego; and√ energy transfer ports: Mobile, Long Beach, Baton Rouge, Lake Charles, New Orleans, Plaquemines, South Louisiana, Baltimore, New York/New Jersey, Beaumont, CorpusChristi, Houston, Texas City, Norfolk.H.R. 7575, in addition to the $50 million appropriation, would provide 10% of HMTF expenditures for expanded uses at donor ports.In WRRDA 2014,Congress also specified that any funds appropriated each year above the FY2012 funding level of $898 million would be classified as priority funds, and directed that a minimum of 10% of the priority funds be used for harbors that have generated more harbor maintenance tax revenue than they have received over the prior three years; these funds can also be used for dredging berths and contaminated sediments (§2102). The Corps has not publicly reported whether 10% of priority funds has been used this way in recent fiscal years.https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11645 by. John Frittelli, Specialist in TransportationPolicy & NicoleT.Carter,Specialist in Natural Resources PolicyThey concluded that “The long-termtrend in Corps dredging has been flat or declining volumes of material dredged, despite significant increases in annual spending. TheCorps’ unit cost of dredging (the cost per cubic yard of material dredged) has increased steadily since the mid-1990s. However, theCorps does not itemize dredging costs by activity (e.g., excavating vs.transport and disposal) to determine the causes of these trends (see CRS Insight IN11133, Harbor Dredging: Issues andHistoricalFunding).Note:“In 1986, Congress enacted the Harbor Maintenance Tax (HMT) to recover operation and maintenance (O&M) costs at U.S. coastal and Great Lakes harbors from maritime shippers. O&M is mostly the dredging of harbor channels to their authorized depths and widths. The tax is levied on importers and domestic shippers using coastal or Great Lakes ports. Due to a Supreme Court decision in 1998, exporters no longer pay the tax because it was found unconstitutional. The tax is assessed at a rate of 0.125% of cargo value ($1.25 per $1,000 in cargo value). The tax revenues are deposited into the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund (HMTF) from which Congress appropriates funds for harbor dredging.Despite a large surplus in the trust fund, the busiest U.S. harbors are presently under-maintained. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) estimates that full channel dimensions at the nation’s busiest 59 ports are available less than 35% of the time. This situation can increase the cost of shipping as vessels carry less cargo in order to reduce their draft or wait for high tide before transiting a harbor.”https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41042.pdfThe 2011 report showed that:“Among the ports listed in Table 2, Los Angeles, Long Beach, Tacoma, and Seattle stand out as ports whose customers generate a substantial amount of HMT revenue that is mostly spent on the maintenance of other harbors. ““The top 25 projects account for nearly half (49%) of total HMTF expenditures.”Source: USACE.Notes: Project name as listed by USACE but with modification by CRS in some cases for clarity. Page 12.https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41042.pdfThe Congressional Research Service in this report further listed recipient ofTable 4. USACE HMTF Expenditures by State/TerritoryState/TerritoryF Y1999-F Y2008Total Expenditures, FY1999-FY2008% of Total Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund Expenditures by StateLA $1,337,545,344 received 19.5% of the funds spent in those years.TX $528,914,950 received 7. 7% of the funds spent in those years.FL $463,824,357 received 6. 8% of the funds spent in those years.CA $454,587,858 received 6. 6% of the funds spent in those years.MI $368,793,819 received 5. 4% of the funds spent in those years.WA $360,905,495 received 5.3% of the funds spent in those years.NY $335,275,282 received 4.9% of the funds spent in those years.OR $315,371,259 received 4.6% of the funds spent in those years.AL $308,013,423 received 4.5% of the funds spent in those years.https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41042.pdfAs you can see from just these decade old figures, states like California, New York, Massachusettes, and Washington pay significant federal taxes, but may not be recipients of services equal in amount to the per capita taxes raised in those states.Footnotes[1] https://www.usace.army.mil/Portals/2/docs/civilworks/om_project/09_hip_pocket.pdf[2] https://www.usace.army.mil/Portals/2/docs/civilworks/news/2014-18_cw_stratplan.pdf[3] Who got special deals in the stimulus and why they got them[4] https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11645