S: Fill & Download for Free

Yes.Even though many in the physics arena will adamantly state that there is only one known way or mechanism to explain the two slit experiment, that of wave-particle duality, there is in fact, another mechanism, with very strong supporting evidence, for that other mechanism.This other mechanism is not only supported by prediction of that mechanism in another cosmic theory, but by devices that were developed according to that other mechanism, in fact at least three devices.This theory was begun to be developed when a device, that was required by the USA military, could not be developed by using the accepted theory, the one based on exactly the phenomena of wave-particle duality. Those using the accepted theory had tried since the 1960’s to develop the Free Electron Laser, for the USA military until 1986, with no success.Then, in 1986, Herman Haus, an electronics engineering professor, one of the best ever, at MIT was tasked with getting the FEL developed. Haus also could not use the existing theory, with the electron as a point that was everywhere at one time, to be used in a tractable way towards developing anything, including the FEL.So Haus dropped the model available and developed another model of the electron, by starting with the formulas of electronics as developed by Maxwell.The model accepted by establishment physics was the one based on the results of the 2 slit experiment, as understood and accepted to be the only way to explain the experiment, that of wave-particle duality.What Haus derived, from first principles, was an electron model where it was an extended in space or 3-D object. This model was sufficient to satisfy several of the then current objections found surrounding the accepted model. This was the difficult to conceptualize point geometry and instantaneous existence at all points in its orbit around an atom, and how the point electron could continue to exist in its orbit around the atom, without falling into the nucleus.By being modeled in a way as to satisfy all of the above and other criteria, the new model had the required properties or features to lend itself towards requirements of electronic engineering for developing devices such as the FEL. This model was used for developing the FEL into a fully functioning device in just two years of work; which work also included the development of the model of the electron that was used towards the FEL.The way that the electron was redone was then carried further to redo all known phenomena, including the 2 slit experiment.For the mechanism involved in his experiment, the particles involved, whether, photons or electrons, worked exactly the same, to produce the fringes in the far field.The mechanism is the following, taken as a quote from the full theory:“A gun (obeying classical physics) sprays bullets towards a target. Before they reach the target, they must pass through a screen with two slits. If bullets go through the slits they will most likely land directly behind the slit, but if they come in at a slight angle, they will land slightly to the sides. The resulting pattern is a map of the likelihood of a bullet landing at each point.The above two-slit pattern happens to be simply the sum of the patterns for each slit considered separately: if half the bullets were fired with only the left slit open and then half were fired with just the right slit open, the result would be the same.With waves, however, the result is very different, because of interference. If the slits were opened one at a time, the pattern would resemble that for bullets: two distinct peaks. But when both slits are open, the waves pass through both slits at once and interfere with each other: where they are in phase they reinforce each other; where they are out of phase they cancel each other out.Double Slit Experiment for WavesNow the quantum paradox: Electrons, like bullets, strike the target one at a time. Yet, like waves, they create an interference pattern.Double Slit Experiment for ElectronsIf each electron passes individually through one slit, with what does it “interfere?” Although each electron arrives at the target at a single place and time, it seems that each has passed through – or somehow felt the presence of both slits at once. Thus, the electron is understood in terms of a wave-particle duality.Illustration of “Wave-Particle Duality”The wave-particle duality is the central mystery of quantum mechanics–the one to which all others can ultimately be reduced.The Classical SolutionClick below to view animations.Classical Electron DiffractionSimulation of the double-slit experiment with electrons. As the electron passes through the slits, it absorbs and emits photons, interacting with both slits. The photon far field pattern of the two-slit shape is imprinted on the electron beam pattern.Top View Detail of Classical Electron DiffractionSee above.The free electron is a plane lamina disk of charge obeying the de Broglie relationship that arises from Maxwell’s Equations (see the Classical Physics of the de Broglie Relationship section of Chapter 3 of R. Mills). As the free electron approaches the slits, its angular momentum vector (shown in black) is randomly oriented. The electron charge induces mirror charges on the slits; the resulting interaction causes the electron to become polarized so that the angular momentum vector is either parallel or antiparallel to the z-axis, the axis of propagation and the normal to the plane of the slits.The interaction of the electron with the slits is mediated by mirror currents that form on the slits, and photons emitted from the currents. When a photon interacts with the electron, the angular frequency (de Broglie wavelength) of the electron changes, with the change matching the frequency of the photon (see Mills Chapter 3).For essentially elastic diffraction, the energies are low and the photons are large, encompassing and emanating from both slits. Each photon has a quantized angular momentum of h-bar. The angular momentum vector of the electron precesses about the angular momentum vector of the absorbed photon.Animation: Precession of the free electron about an axis.Angular momentum vector shown in black.As a result, some of the momentum is transferred from the z-axis to the transverse axis. Exactly how much depends on the strength and duration of the photon-electron interaction. The electron’s angular momentum vector is reoriented upon absorption and emission of one or more photons.Over time, the incident electron beam statistically produces a uniform distribution across the slits. The photon pattern is also uniform across the slits (wherein the statistics is deterministic and local-causal, unlike the quantum mechanical case). Since the electron and each photon have quantized angular momentum in units of h-bar, the photon far-field pattern is imprinted on the electron-beam pattern over time. It is a transverse-momentum map given by the Fourier transform of the two slit shape; this arises classically due to conservation of power flow.The far field distribution.Sine FunctionThe amplitude of the sine function is due to the periodic reversal of the electron angular momentum vector. The envelope amplitude is due to the decreasing probability of electrons landing farther out from center. These require a stronger electron-photon interaction to get a stronger transverse momentum transfer, but stronger interactions are less probable.Since the number of electrons hitting a given position on the detector over time is proportional to the electron kinetic energy, the intensity pattern is the square of the amplitude. The predicted result is equivalent to the observed double slit interference pattern for waves.Mystery ResolvedAccording to quantum mechanics, the electron is a point, but simultaneously everywhere at once, and it goes through both slits simultaneously, “guided” by a probability wave with a phase that depends on the position-momentum Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle:where the phase contains the term Delta-p that is interpreted as the contribution to the uncertainty in the momentum of the incident particle on scattering. In the classical picture, the phase also contains the term Delta-p that is the physical momentum change of the incident particle on scattering. In both cases, the change in position, Delta-x, corresponds to the transverse displacement of the particle due to diffraction.The electron only goes through one slit but is imprinted with the wave character of photons that are created across both slits due to electron-slit interaction. An electromagnetic wave exists. Quantum mechanics reproduces the mathematics that corresponds to this physical electromagnetic wave by invoking a nonsensical waving probability. Thus, it is stuck with the unfortunate result that the “wave-particle duality is unlike anything in our common everyday experience.”Physics can now be reinstated over mysticism for this simple experiment with an understanding of the physical nature of fundamental particles. The details are given in Chapter 8 and Chapter 3 of R. Mills.2005 Brilliant Light Power, Inc.”:Double Slit | Brilliant Light PowerFor further indications as the to accuracy of the Grand Unified Theory-Classical Physics, see the “Case for Millsian Physics”. This is the physics, in the form of two formulas, as used for very accurately modeling molecules of any size and complexity in seconds to a few minutes on a PC, as compared to similar attempts in modeling molecules using Quantum Wave Mechanics, on a mainframe in weeks to get only the Hydrogen atom accurately modeled.The case for Millsian physicsMillsian, Inc. | Brilliant Light PowerIt is now known that the elecron is a disk, rather than a wave and particle extended in time and space.Electron filmed for first time everIf the Free Electron Laser or the Millsian app, is not enough for skeptics, then consider the other devices or aspects coming out of the theory:Lectures and other involvements by universities in the theory:Item 1: Free Electron Laser: Electron ray gun (1986 Haus-MIT) USA military.When the electron's point structure was not enough to develop the free electron laser for the USA military, Haus, an electronics engineering professor at MIT and a student of his, Randell Mills, each separately, used classical physics, which included Maxwellian electro-dynamics, Einstein's Special Relativity, the Stern-Gerlach experiment and the deBroglie standing wave. Using this method of developing the electron's structure, Haus succeeded in developing the laser project into a successful, working device. Using that same base of the newly modeled electron, Mills was able to develop it into his Grand Unified Theory-Classical Physics."An important advance occurred in 1986, when Hermann Haus derived Goedeke’s condition in a new way.[2] Haus finds that all radiation is caused by Fourier components of the charge/current distribution that are light-like (i.e. components that are synchronous with light speed). When a distribution has no light-like Fourier components, such as a point charge in uniform motion, then there is no radiation. Haus uses his formulation to explain Cerenkov radiation in which the speed of light of the surrounding medium is less than c.":https://www.amazon.com/Randell-Mills-Search-Hydrino-Energy/dp/0692760059Nonradiation condition - WikipediaHaus, H. A. (1986). "On the radiation from point charges". American Journal of Physics. 54: 1126. Bibcode:1986AmJPh..54.1126H. doi:10.1119/1.14729.“A theory of classical quantum mechanics (CQM), derived from first principles, successfully applies physical laws on all scales [1]. The classical wave equation is solved with the constraint that a bound electron cannot radiate energy. The mathematical formulation for zero radiation based on Maxwell’s equations follows from a derivation by Haus” page 1:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.17.5866&rep=rep1&type=pdfhttps://books.google.ca/books?id=K3vpCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA224&lpg=PA224&dq=haus+classical+electron&source=bl&ots=nORjpIf-nE&sig=nmV5VR2-Afi6R9KIuQfdCEbG23Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi0oeWTk8PVAhUozoMKHbJ5BLoQ6AEITjAI#v=onepage&q=haus%20classical%20electron&f=falseThe calculations and formulas used to develop the theory:Electromagnetic Noise and Quantum Optical Measurements: Herman A.Haushttps://books.google.ca/books?id=qxaEVZXXNM8C&pg=PA127&lpg=PA127&dq=haus+classical+electron&source=bl&ots=8OZxDJ34Oe&sig=iLh8TkmWnEeI8bqgLHfZFBJZWGE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiD38iVnsPVAhXl34MKHQ8TB8I4ChDoAQhPMAg#v=onepage&q=haus%20classical%20electron&f=falseHermann Anton Haus gave a copy of his development of the classical electron to Randell Mills at MIT, in ~1986, under condition of anonymityIn 1990, in conjunction with his former Chemistry Professor John J Farrell(1990, Franklin and Marshall College), Randell Mills published the first edition of the Grand Unified Theory containing 140 pages.Millsian developers:1: Philip PaynePrincipal Scientist Princeton Universityhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/philip-payne-a97559b/2: Wangshen XieQuant Trader at Tower Research CapitalTower Research CapitalUniversity of Minnesotahttps://www.linkedin.com/in/wangshen-xie-85196218/3: John PaulusGPU Programmer/https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-paulus-a3a6735b/?lipi=urn%3Ali%3Apage%3Ad_flagship3_search_srp_top%3BtUSTg8TeRSW7lJbT8ljU4A%3D%3D&licu=urn%3Ali%3Acontrol%3Ad_flagship3_search_srp_top-search_srp_result&lici=vMnxRSfESc2IFijtXSlLmw%3D%3DItem 3: “Suncell”® Net Power Producing device(2018): Produces energy at an overall cost of 0.1 cent to 0.01 cent per kilowatt-hour which energy is produced from hydrogen electron dropping below ground state Hydrino=(H1/4)=Dark Matter; offered for lease in 2017 to be deployed in 2018 to high power producing or using entities such as utilities, ships, locomotives, large buildings;.2 or 3 more items in development:Item 4: Hydrino-Hydride based virtually indestructible materials 2012?-2020): plastics made from hydrino or dark matter based hydride crystals; military vehicle structures and cladding;.Item 5: Anti-gravity device, in development by Senior Lecturer Huub Bakker and Randell Mills at Massey University, New Zealand. The theory is being used to develop an anti-gravity device which is at the stage of proof of principle which device uses 200 amps of electricity to lift one thousand tons of mass against the gravity field of the Earth.Minute 29-38:20161019 Introduction to the Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics_001University lecture on Mills’ Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics (Prof. Huub Bakker – Massey University, NZ)A lecture by Dr. Mills at Fresno State U Smittcamp Honors College Colloquium. Introduced by Eric Tilton:Eric Tilton(profile from LinkedIn)"Owner and CEOCompany Name MJT Technologies LLCDates Employed Sep 2013 – PresentEmployment Duration 4 yrs 1 moLocation Clovis, CANetherlands university evaluation and introductory course for the GUT-CPAn introduction to Randell Mills' Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics (GUT-CP) : an Eindhoven University of Technology Honors Program 2007-2008 research project - Eindhoven University of Technology research portalhttps://research.tue.nl/en/publications/an-introduction-to-randell-mills-grand-unified-theory-of-classicaRowan University’s report http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Chary%20Redacted%20Report.pdfIn 2002, Rowan University's Anthony Marchese said that whilst "agnostic about the existence of hydrinos", he was quite confident that there was no fraud involved with BLP. Although his NIAC grant was criticized by Bob Park, Marchese said "for me to not continue with this study would be unethical to the scientific community. The only reason not to pursue this would be because of being afraid of being bullied.”Rowan University’s report II http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Jansson%20Redacted%20Report.pdfUNC Asheville’s report http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Dr.%20Booker%20Redacted%20Report.pdfUniversity of Illinois report http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/GlumacReportwithGraphics2014.pdf17.pdf"EUV continuum radiation (10-30 nm) arising only from very low energy pulsed pinchhttp://www.brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/EUV-Mechanism-0518gas discharges comprising some hydrogen was first observed at BlackLight Power, Inc. (BLP) and reproduced at the Harvard Center for Astrophysics (CfA). The source was determined to be due to the transition of H to the lower-energy hydrogen or hydrino state H(1/4) whose emission matches that observed wherein alternative sources were eliminated. ":Chinese Journal of PhysicsVolume 56, Issue 4, August 2018, Pages 1667-1717Power determination and hydrino product characterization of ultra-low field ignition of hydrated silver shotsAuthor links open overlay panelR.MillsY.LuR.Frazerhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2018.04.015Get rights and contentPublications and peer reviewed papers (over 100)by Randell Mills and Brilliant Light and Power:http://www.brettholverstott.com/annoucements/2016/7/21/accountabilityWith so much controversy arising from and surrounding the two slit experiment, maybe there is a real fire associated with all of these smoking guns.After five+ years of research and enquiry, this writer has found too much that corroborates the theory(GUT-CP) to put it all down to a scam, delusion or chance. For me, this theory can only be the real thing, or a model of the cosmos that approaches the real thing, a lot more than does the accepted quantum wave mechanics.The wave nature of particles was the only viable option, up until Haus and Mills reworked the electron, sometime around 1986 -1990. Only up until that time, could that assumption, related to the 2 slit experiment, be accepted or forgiven.With the development of 3–4 fully developed items coming from the new model of photons and electrons, it begs the question, why is the associated theory not accepted more fully?

Yes.Even though many in the physics arena will adamantly state that there is only one known way or mechanism to explain the two slit experiment, that of wave-particle duality, there is in fact, another mechanism, with very strong supporting evidence, for that other mechanism.This other mechanism is not only supported by prediction of that mechanism in another cosmic theory, but by devices that were developed according to that other mechanism, in fact at least four items.This theory was begun to be developed when a device, that was required by the USA military, what is the quantum mechanism that explains how the Free Electron Laser works, for the USA military in 1986.Then, Herman Haus, an electronics engineering professor, one of the best ever, at MIT was tasked with getting the FEL explained. Haus also could not use the existing theory, with the electron as a point that was everywhere at one time, to be used in a tractable way towards explaing anything, including the FEL.So Haus dropped the model available and developed another model of the electron, by starting with the formulas of electronics as developed by Maxwell.The model and from there the quantum mechanical explanation, currently accepted by establishment physics was the one based on the results of the Haus paper on the non-radiation condition, after Goedecke, thereby negating or refuting the waves used in explaining the 2 slit experiment, as understood and accepted under SQM, to be the only way to explain the experiment, that of wave-particle duality.Why waves should not have been attributed to the quantum scale is the following.Waves were first attributed to the quantum scale by physicists, such as Fresnel who, in the 1700’s were doing experimental work involving lenses, prisms, and edges, to describe how light behaves. He and his cohort agreed that waves are the way particles, at the quantum scale, are able to transport energy. What Fresnel did, in effect, is to take the phenomenon of waves as was observed at his time, to then use that phenomenon as an attribute ascribed by him and his cohort to how particles behave at the quantum scale. Since they were the first physicists to make this claim, they now have the permanent authority to do that. As in, first come, first served, and no one is allowed to tell an authority what, if anything, might be wrong with anything they claim. In the 1900’s it was found by analytical methods that, were not available in the 1700’s, that waves as observed in any kind of material, are all artifacts stemming from deeper mechanisms. In fluids, such as water, the waves are a surface portion that is continually breaking away from a horizontal rotating column of water. Therefore in actuality, there is nothing waving in water. What is happening is that vertical structure of water, when its particles meet the surface or interface between the water and air, breaks up that smoothly rotting column to have parts of it try to leap out of that smooth column into the less restrictive thinner air. That difference in stricture is the less viscous air allowing the water at the surface to continue to move in a straighter line as dictated by inertia of motion. This same action can be seen on a rapidly rotating tire, on a transport truck when a load is not attached to the truck. The totally open rear tires, when riding on very wet pavement, will display a thin column of water spraying vertically upward from the topmost portion of the tire, into the air above the tire. That is exactly what the rotating columns of water are doing when in a large body of water, such as a lake of ocean, meets the surface. The horizontal rotating water column, by feeling inertia and much less restriction at the interface between water and air, will tend to continue upwards normal to the surface of the water. That part of the column then, has water, by this time being less associated with the water column that, continues upward to also intrain more surface water into that main upward spray to form a thicker upward moving structure. That vertical structure tips over in the direction of the wind and seems to form a wave. This makes the phenomenon known as a wave on water, to be a much more complex set of mechanisms which has a structure that seems to be a wave, but only as observed by the unaided eye.In a musical instrument, such as a bell, the initial strike by the material of the striker, compresses the material of the bell at one point. From that point, a compression front spreads out in all directions but is more easily observed in the thinner rim where the material provides less resistance to the compression front and so allows the bell to have most of the effect to be concentrated at the rim. That is where the bell displays most of its altered shape, as a sinusoidal variation in the rim. The sinusoidal shape, by varying the bell’s shape mostly at the rim can then be taken to be the prime mechanism, based on such surface observations.A similar compression front is also at work in stringed instruments. The ends of the string, by being firmly anchored at both ends, makes the majority of the length of the string to be more of a very long, floppy kind of lever where the ends, by being firmly anchored, act as fulcrums. The anchored points, receive the motion of the string, to cause the material at the ends to be bent in excess of what its molecular structure is able to sustain. Therefore that small amount of material responds by a reaction that involving unbending with nearly equal force and a reverse action which consists of the ends reacting against the anchor point to send a part of that compression energy towards and into the main structure of the stringed instrument, the sounding box. That compressed fulcrum point is what is actually receiving and sending back the energy in the string, to then be the main mechanism at work in a stringed instrument. Where a wave is observed in a string that shape is produced as a secondary or artifact of that main mechanism that consists of a compression front.This indicates that waves as found at the macro scale, are always artifacts of the actual mechanisms by which energy is transported. Since waves are not the mechanism by which energy is transported at the macro scales, then waves cannot and should not be used to attribute to particles at the quantum scale as the mechanism that transports energy. That is how the first error, on the road of developing QM, was committed.This way of considering of how energy is transported, continues to be used as if a perfectly valid and accurate way for doing that. Why that particular precept of QM is kept is, because of the position that all authority figures in physics, have come to be held at, as if inviolable. Kings and heads of state, when found to be in gross of major error, have their position in the historical record to be more accurately described, to then have them removed from their former venerable position to the more fitting position of disdain.Why that is not allowed in physics, seems to be more about physics being considered as somehow separate from those who developed the theories used to describe it. Since physics is considered to be a very accurate way of describing the way things work in nature, is why those who do that describing are held at their lofty position at which they were at first held, even if and despite having been found to be in error at a later time. And anyways, errors in physics do not hurt any one on a personal level, in the same way that beheadings and other kinds of torture that were committed by political tyrants.Einstein had many times admitted to many blunders, but is still held in high esteem. The same kind of inviolable veneration is attributed to others in say literature, such as Shakespeare. This writer is known to have plagiarized much of his work from the efforts of others, such as Bacon. But that kind of misdeed, however does not hurt anyone, at least not to the same degree in physics and litersture when compared to the physical torture that was committed by heads of state. Or so it seems.The mental harm done by those very major errors in physics, has led to many career oriented people not finding any work to speak of. There is no work where there is no accurate theory to guide the development of useful items that could have been engineered if the theory used were accurate enough to be used for guiding such developments. Many in this category have ended up doing work that has nothing or at least next to nothing to do with physics. Actuarial work in Insurance firms is one very common way to get anything like similar or fitting work to be done where the statistical portion of physics can be applied in more general terms. The closer one gets to doing physics work, the more that that work tends to be more of the mentally dulling kind, as is done in front of a computer screen waiting for the odd number to show up on a graph or list of numbers that might or might not confirm a small detail about a formula that is being closely scrutinized by some high level prof to help confirm a small postulate that might or might not help support a small theoretical point.Without the wave being there, there is no need for the uncertainty principle to show how waves can be in one place or another based on statistical probabilities. The elimination of the uncertainty principle removes any basis for superposition of states whether that be in anything that is entangled or in q-its that depend on superposition of states. Unless there is another basis for waves. That I have not found anywhere.What Haus derived, from first principles, was an electron model where it was an extended in space or 3-D object. This model was sufficient to satisfy several of the then current objections found surrounding the accepted model. This was the difficult to conceptualize point geometry and instantaneous existence at all points in its orbit around an atom, and how the point electron could continue to exist in its orbit around the atom, without falling into the nucleus.By being modelled in a way as to satisfy all of the above and other criteria, the new model had the required properties or features to lend itself towards requirements of electronic engineering for developing devices such as the FEL. This model was used for explaining the FEL full functioning of the device in just two years of work; which work also included the development of the model of the electron that was used towards explaining the FEL.The way that the electron was redone was then carried further to redo all known phenomena, including the 2 slit experiment.For the mechanism involved in his experiment, the particles involved, whether, photons or electrons, worked exactly the same, to produce the fringes in the far field.The mechanism is the following, taken as a quote from the full theory:“A gun (obeying classical physics) sprays bullets towards a target. Before they reach the target, they must pass through a screen with two slits. If bullets go through the slits they will most likely land directly behind the slit, but if they come in at a slight angle, they will land slightly to the sides. The resulting pattern is a map of the likelihood of a bullet landing at each point.The above two-slit pattern happens to be simply the sum of the patterns for each slit considered separately: if half the bullets were fired with only the left slit open and then half were fired with just the right slit open, the result would be the same.With waves, however, the result is very different, because of interference. If the slits were opened one at a time, the pattern would resemble that for bullets: two distinct peaks. But when both slits are open, the waves pass through both slits at once and interfere with each other: where they are in phase they reinforce each other; where they are out of phase they cancel each other out.Double Slit Experiment for WavesNow the quantum paradox: Electrons, like bullets, strike the target one at a time. Yet, like waves, they create an interference pattern.Double Slit Experiment for ElectronsIf each electron passes individually through one slit, with what does it “interfere?” Although each electron arrives at the target at a single place and time, it seems that each has passed through – or somehow felt the presence of both slits at once. Thus, the electron is understood in terms of a wave-particle duality.Illustration of “Wave-Particle Duality”The wave-particle duality is the central mystery of quantum mechanics–the one to which all others can ultimately be reduced.The Classical SolutionClick below to view animations.Classical Electron DiffractionSimulation of the double-slit experiment with electrons. As the electron passes through the slits, it absorbs and emits photons, interacting with both slits. The photon far field pattern of the two-slit shape is imprinted on the electron beam pattern.Top View Detail of Classical Electron DiffractionSee above.The free electron is a plane lamina disk of charge obeying the de Broglie relationship that arises from Maxwell’s Equations (see the Classical Physics of the de Broglie Relationship section of Chapter 3 of R. Mills). As the free electron approaches the slits, its angular momentum vector (shown in black) is randomly oriented. The electron charge induces mirror charges on the slits; the resulting interaction causes the electron to become polarized so that the angular momentum vector is either parallel or antiparallel to the z-axis, the axis of propagation and the normal to the plane of the slits.The interaction of the electron with the slits is mediated by mirror currents that form on the slits, and photons emitted from the currents. When a photon interacts with the electron, the angular frequency (de Broglie wavelength) of the electron changes, with the change matching the frequency of the photon (see Mills Chapter 3).For essentially elastic diffraction, the energies are low and the photons are large, encompassing and emanating from both slits. Each photon has a quantized angular momentum of h-bar. The angular momentum vector of the electron precesses about the angular momentum vector of the absorbed photon.Animation: Precession of the free electron about an axis.Angular momentum vector shown in black.As a result, some of the momentum is transferred from the z-axis to the transverse axis. Exactly how much depends on the strength and duration of the photon-electron interaction. The electron’s angular momentum vector is reoriented upon absorption and emission of one or more photons.Over time, the incident electron beam statistically produces a uniform distribution across the slits. The photon pattern is also uniform across the slits (wherein the statistics is deterministic and local-causal, unlike the quantum mechanical case). Since the electron and each photon have quantized angular momentum in units of h-bar, the photon far-field pattern is imprinted on the electron-beam pattern over time. It is a transverse-momentum map given by the Fourier transform of the two slit shape; this arises classically due to conservation of power flow.The far field distribution.Sine FunctionThe amplitude of the sine function is due to the periodic reversal of the electron angular momentum vector. The envelope amplitude is due to the decreasing probability of electrons landing farther out from center. These require a stronger electron-photon interaction to get a stronger transverse momentum transfer, but stronger interactions are less probable.Since the number of electrons hitting a given position on the detector over time is proportional to the electron kinetic energy, the intensity pattern is the square of the amplitude. The predicted result is equivalent to the observed double slit interference pattern for waves.Mystery ResolvedAccording to quantum mechanics, the electron is a point, but simultaneously everywhere at once, and it goes through both slits simultaneously, “guided” by a probability wave with a phase that depends on the position-momentum Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle:where the phase contains the term Delta-p that is interpreted as the contribution to the uncertainty in the momentum of the incident particle on scattering. In the classical picture, the phase also contains the term Delta-p that is the physical momentum change of the incident particle on scattering. In both cases, the change in position, Delta-x, corresponds to the transverse displacement of the particle due to diffraction.The electron only goes through one slit but is imprinted with the wave character of photons that are created across both slits due to electron-slit interaction. An electromagnetic wave exists. Quantum mechanics reproduces the mathematics that corresponds to this physical electromagnetic wave by invoking a nonsensical waving probability. Thus, it is stuck with the unfortunate result that the “wave-particle duality is unlike anything in our common everyday experience.”Physics can now be reinstated over mysticism for this simple experiment with an understanding of the physical nature of fundamental particles. The details are given in Chapter 8 and Chapter 3 of R. Mills.2005 Brilliant Light Power, Inc.”:Double Slit | Brilliant Light PowerFor further indications as the to accuracy of the Grand Unified Theory-Classical Physics, see the “Case for Millsian Physics”. This is the physics, in the form of two formulas, as used for very accurately modeling molecules of any size and complexity in seconds to a few minutes on a PC, as compared to similar attempts in modeling molecules using Quantum Wave Mechanics, on a mainframe in weeks to get only the Hydrogen atom accurately modeled.The case for Millsian physicsMillsian, Inc. | Brilliant Light PowerIf the Free Electron Laser or the Millsian app, is not enough for skeptics, then consider the other devices or aspects coming out of the theory:Lectures and other involvements by universities in the theory:Item 1: Quantum mechanical explanation Free Electron Laser: Electron ray gun (1986 Haus-MIT) USA military.When the electron's point structure was not enough to explain the mechanism driving the free electron laser for the USA military, Haus, an electronics engineering professor at MIT and a student of his, Randell Mills, each separately, used classical physics, which included Maxwellian electro-dynamics, Einstein's Special Relativity, the Stern-Gerlach experiment and the deBroglie standing wave. Using this method of developing the electron's structure, Haus succeeded in developing explanation for the FEL. Using that same base of the newly modeled electron, Mills was able to develop it into his Grand Unified Theory-Classical Physics."An important advance occurred in 1986, when Hermann Haus derived Goedeke’s condition in a new way.[2] Haus finds that all radiation is caused by Fourier components of the charge/current distribution that are light-like (i.e. components that are synchronous with light speed). When a distribution has no light-like Fourier components, such as a point charge in uniform motion, then there is no radiation. Haus uses his formulation to explain Cerenkov radiation in which the speed of light of the surrounding medium is less than c.":https://www.amazon.com/Randell-Mills-Search-Hydrino-Energy/dp/0692760059Nonradiation condition - WikipediaHaus, H. A. (1986). "On the radiation from point charges". American Journal of Physics. 54: 1126. Bibcode:1986AmJPh..54.1126H. doi:10.1119/1.14729.“A theory of classical quantum mechanics (CQM), derived from first principles, successfully applies physical laws on all scales [1]. The classical wave equation is solved with the constraint that a bound electron cannot radiate energy. The mathematical formulation for zero radiation based on Maxwell’s equations follows from a derivation by Haus” page 1:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.17.5866&rep=rep1&type=pdfhttps://books.google.ca/books?id=K3vpCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA224&lpg=PA224&dq=haus+classical+electron&source=bl&ots=nORjpIf-nE&sig=nmV5VR2-Afi6R9KIuQfdCEbG23Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi0oeWTk8PVAhUozoMKHbJ5BLoQ6AEITjAI#v=onepage&q=haus%20classical%20electron&f=falseThe calculations and formulas used to develop the theory:Electromagnetic Noise and Quantum Optical Measurements: Herman A.Haushttps://books.google.ca/books?id=qxaEVZXXNM8C&pg=PA127&lpg=PA127&dq=haus+classical+electron&source=bl&ots=8OZxDJ34Oe&sig=iLh8TkmWnEeI8bqgLHfZFBJZWGE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiD38iVnsPVAhXl34MKHQ8TB8I4ChDoAQhPMAg#v=onepage&q=haus%20classical%20electron&f=falseHermann Anton Haus gave a copy of his development of the classical electron to Randell Mills at MIT, in ~1986, under condition of anonymityIn 1990, in conjunction with his former Chemistry Professor John J Farrell(1990, Franklin and Marshall College), Randell Mills published the first edition of the Grand Unified Theory containing 140 pages.Millsian developers:1: Philip PaynePrincipal Scientist Princeton Universityhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/philip-payne-a97559b/2: Wangshen XieQuant Trader at Tower Research CapitalTower Research CapitalUniversity of Minnesotahttps://www.linkedin.com/in/wangshen-xie-85196218/3: John PaulusGPU Programmer/https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-paulus-a3a6735b/?lipi=urn%3Ali%3Apage%3Ad_flagship3_search_srp_top%3BtUSTg8TeRSW7lJbT8ljU4A%3D%3D&licu=urn%3Ali%3Acontrol%3Ad_flagship3_search_srp_top-search_srp_result&lici=vMnxRSfESc2IFijtXSlLmw%3D%3DItem 3: “Suncell”® Net Power Producing device(2018): Produces energy at an overall cost of 0.1 cent to 0.01 cent per kilowatt-hour which energy is produced from hydrogen electron dropping below ground state Hydrino=(H1/4)=Dark Matter; offered for lease in 2017 to be deployed in 2018 to high power producing or using entities such as utilities, ships, locomotives, large buildings;.2 or 3 more items in development:Item 4: Hydrino-Hydride based virtually indestructible materials 2012?-2020): plastics made from hydrino or dark matter based hydride crystals; military vehicle structures and cladding;Hydrinos and rheir compounds are currently, October, 2020, been sent to several laboratories all over the world to be analyzed by the use of any instruments and methods as seen to fit by those working at such labs with no input from Mills as to how to use those methods or instruments in analyzing that material..Item 5: Anti-gravity device, in development by Senior Lecturer Huub Bakker and Randell Mills at Massey University, New Zealand. The theory is being used to develop an anti-gravity device which is at the stage of proof of principle which device uses 200 amps of electricity to lift one thousand tons of mass against the gravity field of the Earth.Minute 29-38:20161019 Introduction to the Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics_001University lecture on Mills’ Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics (Prof. Huub Bakker – Massey University, NZ)A lecture by Dr. Mills at Fresno State U Smittcamp Honors College Colloquium. Introduced by Eric Tilton:Eric Tilton(profile from LinkedIn)"Owner and CEOCompany Name MJT Technologies LLCDates Employed Sep 2013 – PresentEmployment Duration 4 yrs 1 moLocation Clovis, CANetherlands university evaluation and introductory course for the GUT-CPAn introduction to Randell Mills' Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics (GUT-CP) : an Eindhoven University of Technology Honors Program 2007-2008 research project - Eindhoven University of Technology research portalhttps://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Natutech.nl_Article.pdfRowan University’s report http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Chary%20Redacted%20Report.pdfIn 2002, Rowan University's Anthony Marchese said that whilst "agnostic about the existence of hydrinos", he was quite confident that there was no fraud involved with BLP. Although his NIAC grant was criticized by Bob Park, Marchese said "for me to not continue with this study would be unethical to the scientific community. The only reason not to pursue this would be because of being afraid of being bullied.”Rowan University’s report II http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Jansson%20Redacted%20Report.pdfUNC Asheville’s report http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Dr.%20Booker%20Redacted%20Report.pdfUniversity of Illinois report http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/GlumacReportwithGraphics2014.pdf17.pdf"EUV continuum radiation (10-30 nm) arising only from very low energy pulsed pinchhttp://www.brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/EUV-Mechanism-0518gas discharges comprising some hydrogen was first observed at BlackLight Power, Inc. (BLP) and reproduced at the Harvard Center for Astrophysics (CfA). The source was determined to be due to the transition of H to the lower-energy hydrogen or hydrino state H(1/4) whose emission matches that observed wherein alternative sources were eliminated. ":Chinese Journal of PhysicsVolume 56, Issue 4, August 2018, Pages 1667-1717Power determination and hydrino product characterization of ultra-low field ignition of hydrated silver shotsAuthor links open overlay panelR.MillsY.LuR.Frazerhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2018.04.015Get rights and contentPublications and peer reviewed papers (over 100)by Randell Mills and Brilliant Light and Power:http://www.brettholverstott.com/annoucements/2016/7/21/accountabilityWith so much controversy arising from and surrounding the two slit experiment, maybe there is a real fire associated with all of these smoking guns.After 8+ years of survey and detailed enquiry, this writer has found too much that corroborates the theory(GUT-CP) to put it all down to a scam, delusion or chance. For me, this theory can only be the real thing, or a model of the cosmos that approaches the real thing, a lot more , by a factor of at least 100 more than does the accepted quantum wave mechanics.The wave nature of particles was the only viable option, up until Haus and Mills reworked the electron, sometime around 1986 -1990. Only up until that time, could that assumption, related to the 2 slit experiment, be accepted or forgiven.With the development of 3–4 fully developed items coming from the new model of photons and electrons, it begs the question, why is the associated theory not accepted more fully? Because of incumbency as the accepted way of doing physics according to those in academia. An outsider such a Mills is, is therefore not allowed to have an opinion. That then indicates that there is much more going on or is at stake than just physics and more about how things are just done, a paradigm, but less about physics as such.

Mathematics of the impossible. It is all math based on the assumption that the interpretation of the what causes the fringe pattern in the 2-slt experiment to be an accurate cause. The infinite number of waves that each particle should have associated with the particle, is an assumption based on not having any other explanation that was available up until the time when another, more accurate model of the cosmos was derived from first principles in 1986. Even though many in the physics arena will adamantly state that there is only one known way or mechanism to explain the two slit experiment, that of wave-particle duality, there is in fact, another mechanism, with very strong supporting evidence, for that other mechanism. This other mechanism is not only supported by prediction of that mecha(more)