Federal Savings: Fill & Download for Free

Well considering two things:The murder of Vincent Chin (for which the killers got probation and a $4,000 fine).AndAbacus Federal Savings Bank - WikipediaThe ONLY bank that was prosecuted for the great 2008 crash.I’d say nope.

As others have written, the answer is “yes”…technically (nobody believes that is likely, but you appear to be asking if this scenario is at all possible. And, it is possible…not at all likely, not probable, not even remotely likely).I would only add this thought…any such pardon by a sitting president would not cover any STATE crimes, or local crimes.Nixon’s crimes were all federal. All of them. Thus, the pardon of Nixon that was issued by Gerald Ford did get Nixon a “stay out of jail card.” For the rest of his life.Donald Trump is a different story, though. It is obvious that Trump has broken many local laws, and a presidential pardon does not in any way affect those prosecutions. The state of New York, the state of Maryland, the state of Florida, the state of Virginia and the state of Illinois, all appear to have very strong evidence of crimes that Trump has committed that violate their particular state laws.thus, a pardon by a president only applies to federal statutes, and to federal prosecution.A pardon from a president does not apply to the money laundering that occurred through a bank in Chicago. Trump, Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner, all engaged in money laundering in a deal with Stephen M. Calk and the Federal Savings Bank, located in Chicago. The state of Illinois has strict laws against such things. The penalties can be pretty severe. A pardon at the federal level does not apply to state income tax fraud and violations of banking laws that occurred in the state of New York. New York has some fairly strict laws concerning such crimes.The same is true for many other jurisdictions.

Unknown. Likely yes.Romulus was destroyed. But the Romulan Empire survived. I mean, it’s preposterous to presume that the Romulans were so daft that they didn’t realize that keeping all their people in one system was a terrible idea. They aren’t even from that system as they, themselves, fled Vulcan at the conclusion of a centuries long genocidal war.Note: So this is a retcon the show actually gets right. In the Abrams film, it is heavily implied that the annihilation of Romulus ends that empire. Look at the Spanish, Portuguese or British empires. If you destroyed Britain, there is still the rest of the empire where they settled. The Romulan Star Empire had multiple colonial worlds likely with billions of Romulan citizens. The 900 million the Federation saved were resettled. Some did go to the Federation but the majority would do what would happen if the British needed to be resettled: probably go to a colony with plenty of their fellow citizens.It’s my guess that between the goodwill generated by the alliance in the Federation-Dominion War (or The Great Galactic War … nobody will get that reference) and then the aid to Romulus likely ended the old agreement. It seems likely that if the Neutral Zone (a DMZ) was dissolved so too was the Treaty of Algernon, having been replaced by something that:Established bilateral trade and political relations,Established a cross border medical and scientific exchange,Likely removed the tactical disadvantage that Starfleet had,Likely established a set of rights for the Romulan citizens in the UFP,Likely established a set of rights for the Federation citizens in the RSE.