I 826: Fill & Download for Free

Okay, I have a huge secret. I know it will come as a huge shock to all of you, but I feel I need to be honest with my readers.Okay, deep breath.Here’s the truth. I’m a Zionist. I’m a supporter of Israel. I’m an Israeli citizen. I support the existence of Israel as the Jewish and Democratic State. I was a Fellow for the government of Israel. In fact, in three weeks, I will be IN Israel.I had written 1,711 answers on Israel, 826 answers on the conflict, and 88 answers on Zionism. I’m a Most read writer on Israel.It’s shocking, but true. I am a Zionist.

I haven't seen any reviews of this particular phone lately but i know that the desire 826 uses the same snapdragon 615 chipset which has over heating problems. So according to me there might be some heating issues. I will edit my answer once I get to know more about the HTC desire 826.

“Would sending illegal immigrants to prison for entering in illegally be a good deterrence to more illegal immigration?”This idea has already been tested! Just do an internet search for “Operation Streamline.” Here are just a couple of links, but there are many more, and many of them do not speak kindly of the program:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Streamlinehttps://www.oig.dhs.gov/assets/Mgmt/2015/OIG_15-95_May15.pdfBut in case you just want an answer to the question, let me give you a rather lengthy summary of a rather large case study. In 2005, an agreement was worked out between the Del Rio Sector of the U.S. Border Patrol, the U.S. Attorney’s Office and U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, and the U.S. Marshal’s Office in Del Rio. Essentially, the parties agreed to a system by which all illegal aliens apprehended by the Border Patrol in the areas closest around the Ports of Entry in Del Rio and Eagle Pass, Texas, would be federally prosecuted for 8 U.S.C. § 1325 - Improper entry by alien. Furthermore, those aliens found guilty were initially sentenced to serve 10 days, with longer sentences given to aliens who were apprehended again.The reason an agreement between the parties involved was needed, was to address and mitigate the concern that prosecuting every illegal alien apprehended by the Border Patrol would flood and overload the federal court system and detract from attention given to other crimes that might be considered more serious.In practice, the Border Patrol avoided overloading the court by initially limiting itself to only prosecuting illegal aliens apprehended in areas closest to the Ports of Entry in Del Rio and Eagle Pass, Texas. Once word spread that illegal aliens apprehended in the cities were being sent to jail for 10 days, they began illegally crossing the border outside the cities, where other apprehended illegal aliens had merely been sent back across the border. This had the additional effect of helping the Border Patrol by giving them more time to detect and apprehend the illegal aliens in before they were able to hide in and around the cities.Once the number of illegal aliens being apprehended in the cities had dropped significantly, the Border Patrol slowly and steadily expanded the areas in which apprehended illegal aliens would be prosecuted, thereby avoiding overloading the federal court while also gradually influencing most illegal aliens to cross the border farther and farther from the cities. The expansion continued until all illegal aliens apprehended in the entire Del Rio Sector were being prosecuted.The negative effects of this were increased costs for the Border Patrol and U.S. Marshals to transport and detain the increased number of prisoners, and an increased workload for the Border Patrol agents that had to do the additional paperwork and present the cases in court. This was also accompanied by a decrease in apprehensions by the Border Patrol, that could only logically be caused by either fewer illegal entries or less effective enforcement.There were also other changes to the way illegal aliens were processed during this time that makes analyzing the results less straightforward. Specifically, the amount of paperwork involved in processing each illegal alien increased absurdly. Previously the apprehension of most illegal aliens led to a Voluntary Return and was typically documented on only two forms: the I-213 Record of Deportable/Inadmissible Alien, and the I-826 Notice of Rights and Request for Disposition. In 2004, the Border Patrol began using the process of Expedited Removal to issue a formal order of Removal against almost all illegal aliens that were apprehended. The only practical result of the removal process was to create a record that would prevent subsequent legal entries by those aliens. In short, an illegal alien that was apprehended, processed for Voluntary Return, and sent back to Mexico (pretty much the only option in this situation), took about 10 minutes of paperwork and could still apply later for legal entry. An illegal alien processed for Expedited Removal typically takes a couple of hours of paperwork and is prevented from applying for legal entry for five years. This means that about the same time the Border Patrol started “Operation Streamline” in Del Rio, Texas, they also vastly increased the amount of paperwork required to document/process each illegal alien they apprehended, thereby giving some credence to the argument for “less effective enforcement.”If you’re still reading this, let me now just straight up answer the question. YES, sending illegal aliens (incorrectly aka illegal immigrants) to prison for entering illegally, DOES deter SOME illegal immigration. However, it does not deter all illegal immigration, particularly when enforcement of immigration law stops at the border. While changes in the way illegal aliens are handled has made enforcement more difficult, prosecuting illegal aliens has also made a noticeable difference in illegal entries. Of course, some illegal aliens have just changed their tactics by bringing their children with them, forcing the Border Patrol to look for other was to deter illegal immigration without “separating families.”Let me add one final personal note. I fully support enforcing immigration law at the border and in the interior of the U.S. For people who don’t appreciate strict enforcement of immigration law, I would suggest changing the law to improve and expand the system for legal immigration, which I would also support.