Paying It Forward Scholarship Program - University Of Phoenix: Fill & Download for Free

Harsh question but it goes to the heart of inequality reasons.Here's a shocker about the majority of celebrities: They aren’t that smart.Now everything with consciousness from roach to Rhodes Scholar is intelligent; smart is the application of intelligence.The majority of Black and Latino entertainers and sports celebrities come from the majority educational level of Latinos and African Americans—-which is about high school level. Only 25–30% of the entire American population is post high school/college level educated. Within Blacks and Latinos that equals to about 25%-35% respectively. So 2 out of 3 celebrities comes from high school educated parents. Then they became celebrities.Celebrities also have a shelf life. Most struggle for several years to a decade, achieve some sort of regular success/fame and then even out to the B & C list. A List stars are rare comparatively speaking to the number of actors that are registered with SAG. One also has to consider that they have to look at 40+ years of survival, their own families, illness, etc. when they accept a job. It might seem like $50,000 an episode is a lot but after taxes, staff, agents, travel, etc. then divide those episodes against the 40+ years and it’s why you see more and more actors and actresses doing schlockier projects. They need to up that yearly average income to maintain being “rich”. And here we are asking for some of their cash for charity when they might not even be sure that it will last their lifetime.For sports stars, they have a narrower intellectual bandwidth familially and therefore financial opportunity window, less than 20 years, sometimes even less than 10 years to go professional, accumulate money, avoid injury and get out with some sort of nest egg. Most don’t because it’s a dual reality pressure—-be excellent to stay in the game and learn all the financial ins and outs to insure wealth at the end of a career that one might not be able to calculate the end time of. While they are technically in college there is no guarantee that they are getting an advanced education pointedly in urban development, social development and psychology and business development.Entertainers (singers, actors, models, rappers) fall into an even more competitive category. There is no “natural talent”—-there’s concerted practice, improvement, mentorship and networking. Having to do all of that from scratch is difficult. The most successful people started out very early and went to school—-Yale Drama, School of the Performing Arts, college, etc. (Jodie Foster, Angela Bassett, Viola Davis, Meryl Streep) which gave them a boost to becoming a working, paid entertainer.The rest, not college educated, aspire to, like mice, chew their way into the business, which is highly difficult to impossible.Both sets require concerted practice, improvement, mentorship and networking which drains from the time and attention one can pay to one’s community. And 60%- 70% of Latinos and Blacks are living at a median Middle Class level or lower so there is no incentive to stay. The irony of poverty and attaining one’s goals is that it gives you the resources to leave. Once out, why return? There is rarely resources, support or sanity for the level that one might obtain outside of one’s community of origin. You don’t need to go back, you need to get out and stay away to maintain a foothold in the new world of entertainment/sports——success.All of the resources and profit for one’s attaining entrance to those worlds is not in poverty based neighborhoods.Juanita SuperstarJuanita Superstar leaves Spanish Harlem to become a great dancer, actress, singer. In order to attain these things she needs dance training—-those schools/teachers aren’t in her neighborhood; nor are acting coaches and singing coaches. Once she’s somewhere else—-Hollywood, Broadway, even a college setting, she likes that world better, even if it’s slightly foreign because it’s less dysfunctional, it’s more enhancing, it’s more encouraging of her talents developing and her interests.Now she’s in a world which begins to reward her for her work of multiple years and she returns to Spanish Harlem because she wants to give back but she runs into multiple problems based upon her education.Contributing Cash, up to $50, 000Let’s say she shows up at the local WalMart knock off store and buys $50,000 worth of food and toys for everyone in the store on Christmas Eve. The effort is useless. It’s like if I put a quarter in a parking meter for you when you park and ask how that’s changed your life? For a micro-instant it’s alleviated a cost but in the long run it’s done nothing. Now if I bought a plot of land and made it your personal parking space in the city and donated it to you and paid all the property taxes on it—-that might change an aspect of your life.Juanita’s contribution is insignificant to the real community issues.The food, the toys, the coats, have a shelf life of maybe a year but have no resale value and sure as heck can’t be used to progressively move someone forward. Take your XBox to a job interview and tell them the XBox is the reason they should hire you. Then tell them Juanita also bought you a jacket. And she bought you a weeks worth of groceries. The groceries should entitle you to a college degree too, right?You see how short term doing Xmas store buyouts are, right?It’s the qualitative difference between a handjob and marriage.Contributing $1 Million x 20 YearsOk, let’s say Juanita really makes it big so when she returns she’s got some real bank to do something and she invests in opening a charter school. She guarantees $1 million dollars for 20 years for the school. She’s guarantees $20 million in an escrow account.But wait. What does a school cost?$1 million on staff, rent and insurance for the building, a year.Now each child needs about $7000 on top of the monies from the city/state/federal government—-generally about $7000. $14,000 per year, per student.And we have 1000 applicants to the school. Let’s say we accept 500.That’s $7 million a year. The school budget is $140 million for 20 years.Let’s call it a total of $10 million a year to run the school.Juanita’s monies are a huge assistance but not the full answer because let’s say we pull all the monies together with hers, we still have to contend with the children and their education levels that have been inculcated by the public school system and their parent’s lack of awareness about their responsibility to enhance and supplement their children’s education.Most parents, particularly Blacks and Latinos, think their job is to drop their children off and get perfectly baked (smart) cookies-children at the end of the day. It doesn’t work that way. After $10 million dollars and substandard test scores and low graduation rates, Juanita learns that the children, due to systemic issues of poverty, low expectations, bad school districts, low parental education and lack of interest, health, curiosity and resilience issues (trademarks of the psychology within poverty), the shiny charter school is prettier than the old public school but not testing qualitatively higher than the school it replaced.Contributing $100 million+Juanita busts the bank in her work away from the neighborhood. She returns worth hundreds of millions of dollars. She starts buying up land, tracts of houses to renovate, opening or rehabbing stores; several charter schools, parks and even a college scholarship program. She has a huge inbred problem.The residents.People helicopter view communities as something you could sweep in and change if you threw in some money, X, Y, Z and some love. But one of the things that you’d have to do is talk to someone like me who has worked with poverty populations on a educational, social, political level for years about is whether the poor people you’re offering all this stuff want change. People in poverty are there for also personal reasons, not just systemic/financial/opportunity based ones, not everyone wants to study in college, work 40–80 hours a week at a career, be away from their children, family, entertainment.Unfortunately the respite from poverty is sex, entertainment and some form of drug, whether legal or illegal. If you can lower your standards, you can enjoy poverty because it demands less of you. Poor people often lack the trained skills of resilience and grit to move out of poverty (including discipline, learning new rules and modalities, budgeting, having less children); those of us not in poverty don’t often see how we are different than people in poverty psychologically to be able to advance. This is why only 18% of people from generational poverty move to middle class or higher, it’s a huge mental shift that can’t be achieved alone. To move from poverty is a form of mental, psychic, and social suicide to the old way of life—-again illustrated by Lottery winners, 70% losing it all in 5 years.Watch the show My Dream Lottery House and listen carefully to how much people have won and the kind of house they’re looking for. Most win $1 million (now minus taxes) which is $530k+—-they’re often looking for homes in the range of $400k to $500k—-the show itself gassing them up. In all honesty the best ones are the ones who want houses under $250k but that’s not really exciting fantasy TV is it?These psychological issues of the poor, Juanita's community is why her giving is so problematic to achieve teh results she’s seen, Middle Class and higher, outside of her community. Those communities have differently trained and thinking people who have had time, corporate and governmental support to be qualitatively and quantitatively different than the poor neighboring communities.Juanita pissed and frustrated puts the brakes on leaving $100 million to her neighborhood because there aren’t enough educated, honest, long term thinkers in the neighborhood to steward the money. So she gives $230 million to the University of Southern California….and they name a building after her and give her a lifetime supply of Beats headphones.People want change when they don’t have to do much for it and it benefits them. But there’s a deep psychological correlation to why only 18% of poor Americans move from Poverty to Middle Class or higher in their lifetimes. You have to want out and be willing to change your entire perspective (and cut off relationships) to change. That’s not only hard but impossible to do for some people.Juanita’s mass community change infusion breeds resentment because who is she to come in and tell people the way they’re living their lives is wrong? Who asked her to do all of this?They want her money but not what her program/development demands of them. They want food and XBoxes which is why she goes to Spanish Harlem and drops $50k at the department store for everyone there and gives hundreds of millions to USC.The two communities, want different things—-give me an XBox in Spanish Harlem VS give me a scholarship worth $50k so I can complete my degree and start earning at least $40k a year—I can help myself, my family and maybe even give back again. One is a better investment than the other.The Conundrum of Latino and Black WealthSo you have Black and Latinos who achieve wealth but don’t know how to do anything with it but spend and pray they keep making more money because they have no generational lessons in money, ownership, legacy building, capitalism. They are the first, the Alpha, person to begin the generational legacy that will potentially garner multi-generational outcomes.The vast majority, 75% or more, of Black and Latino entertainers and athletes, can at best move some of their closest relatives out of poverty stricken communities and try to learn how to integrate socially and financially into higher class communities where problems have been solved.Community and Civic minded celebrities have the challenge of they know what to do, how to do it and may even have the resources and network to get it done, but the resistance they will meet at not just the legal-political and financial level, which is natural, but the recipient level, which is unnatural, isn’t worth the effort.Try feeding someone who keeps spitting the food back at you. Or improving a neighborhood that a percentage of the people keep vandalizing. Or changing decades, centuries, worth of behavioral programming.That’s the complex challenge.Addendum:I got DMed the question what might be a resource to understand what to do, give and develop if one were in a celebrities position or just generally interested and fortunate enough to have minor to major resources. I use this book in my classes a lot to point out Black and Latino social/urban and future development ideas and practices.The National Plan to Empower Black America: Dr. Claud Anderson: 9780966170221: Amazon.com: Books#KylePhoenix

Mike SprechtIn one word, YES! HRC’s only two accomplishments in life were graduating from Yale LS and marrying Bill Clinton. She is the epitome of an empty pants suit, i.e., someone with good credentials, a lot of impressive titles and NO ACCOMPLISHMENTS! Even her positions/titles were attained on the coat tails of Bill Clinton.After law school HRC took the Bar exam in DC and in Arkansas. She had accepted a position with a large private firm in DC but failed the bar exam. (The average passing rate on the DC Bar Exam exceeds 50%. So Hillary’s score was in the bottom 49 or less percent, i.e., not an indication of a genius or of legal scholarship.) She passed the Arkansas Bar and decided to follow her boyfriend Bill Clinton to Little Rock. There she worked for some public interest groups before joining a private law firm in Little Rock Arkansas. Lawyers in the community considered her to be just a so-so lawyer who made partner at the firm because her husband was politically connected and was in a position to refer business to the law firm. When she left Arkansas, the Whitewater corruption fiasco was discovered. The firm became embroiled in the investigation and closed down. One of her friends and a partner in the law firm, Vince Foster, was mysteriously found dead in his office. We now know that HRC also had a protracted and open affair with Vince Foster. Mr. Foster's office files later surfaced in Hillary’s possession in DC.As First Lady she tried to get the spotlight by championing “universal health care.” There was no political appetite for government run health care and the structure of the system she proposed was so complex and convoluted that the cost of the system would have been astronomical. After universal health care was exposed as Hillary’s folly she faded into the WH woodwork for the remainder of Bill’s Presidency, other than to show up to defend Bill for his sexual predator activities and to threaten and crucify the women he abused. Of course, it was all “a vast right wing conspiracy.”She was only elected Senator on the coat tails of Bill Clinton. The facts are that she ony became a Senator because JFK Jr. Was killed in a plane crash. HRC entered the race immediately following JFK's death. Due to his death she was virtually unopposed for the nomination. Of course, as the Democratic nominee in NY she was virtually a shoe in to be elected to the Senate. With Bill's help she was able to raise campaign funds for herself and other member of the NY Democratic contingent, like Schumer, Rangel, etc.. so they supported her, She spent most of her time in the Senate raising campaign funds for herself and her cohort and networking to gain support for her planned run for the Presidency. She was unopposed in the Democratic primary when she ran for reelection. Consequently, as the Democratic nominee from NY she was once again shoe in. In her entire time in the Senate she sponsored a whole 3 successful but insignificant bills. One was to name a post office in NY State for deceased AA Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. In her speeches and in her commercials she claims credit for passage of the CHIPs, health insurance program for children. That is a lie. She was not in the Senate at the time that legislation was passed. She was still the First Lady. She did not sponsor the legislation, help draft it, etc... She may have been in favor of it but so were millions of other people who had nothing to do with the crafting or passage of the legislation. Again, another one of Hellary's many lies.Hillary will speak about the legislation she co-sponsored. That is code for legislation that she did no work on but wanted to take credit for because she thought it was likely to pass. While occasionally bills are co-sponsored by just a few members of Congress who do the heavy lifting, i.e, draft and promote the legislation. That is not the case with the bills that Hillary co-sponsored. The type of bills that Hillary co-sponsored were sponsored by other legislators. Then when the heavy lifting was completed the bills were circulated to get sponsorship from a large number of other legislators to insure the bills passage and bi-partisan support. These are opportunities for members of Congress to look like they are doing something by co-sponsoring these bills when they are not really doing anything. They are merely co-sponsoring legislation that they know will pass and that they do not object to in order to get some credit to promote to their constituents back in their home states.Next, Hillary was appointed SOS as part of a deal to get Bill Clinton’s Democratic political machine to support Barak Obama, who Bill Clinton despises. As Sec’y of State her policies and actions were a continuous display of bad judgment, ineffectiveness, non-existent management and leadership skills and lack of ethics. In fact, if it wasn’t for bad judgment HRC would have no judgment at all. Her judgments on policy matters and actions were consistently terrible, be it Libya, the Iraqi withdraw, Syria, Honduras, the Russian reset, etc.. all were failed policies. Tim Kaine makes the excuse that the reason why the US withdrew from Iraq was that the Status of Forces agreement with Iraq expired and Iraq made unreasonable demands in the negations to keep troops in Iraq. This is unadulterated hog wash. Status of Forces agreement are scheduled to expire on purpose. When they expire there is a well known dance that the leadership in the host country and in DC perform. The host country leader has to make demands on the terms under which the US can retain forces in their country. They need to do this to look strong to their constituents and to not look like a US puppet. The host country leaders, however, want US forces to stay. Then the US consents to some of the host country leaders demands to make him look good. These are things that were not critical to begin with. Obama & HRC, however, did not want to retain troops in Iraq, so when Iraq made demands under which US fouces could stay, instead of engaging in the dance they used it as an excuse to leave Iraq. Moreover, they withdrew US troops rapidly before Iraqi troops found be adequately recruited, trained and outfitted. This power vacuum was filled by Isis. Now years later, billions of $s latter and thousand of innocent lives later we are fighting Isis in the Iraq, Syria, Libya, Europe and even in the US. While Tim Kaine gives Hillary credit for pulling together the international coalition to impose economic sanctions on Iran, that is not really true. Most of the heavy lifting was done by Congress. It’s true that unlike the WH, the DOS didn’t oppose or try to interfere with the sanctions sought by the Congress and promoted the sanction in the UN.According to ABC News, which investigated this claim made by HRC and Tim Kaine:(Quote) Mark Dubowitz, executive director of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, noted that “…Clinton's State Department does deserve credit for getting the United Nations Security Council on board with tough sanctions. But she isn't giving Congress enough credit for its work, Dubowitz said. It significantly understates the pivotal role that Congress played in originating and passing some of the most effective energy and financial sanctions," he said of Clinton's comments. Former congressman Howard Berman, a Democrat from California who co-sponsored the 2010 Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Divestment Act, praised Clinton's corralling of the U.N. Security Council… Referring to Clinton's assessment of her role, Berman said, "There's some almost automatic human tendency in politics to think that one's role was the critical additional factor in making something happen." Dubowitz said he hoped that over time, recognition for the Iran sanctions will also go to "unsung heroes" like Stuart Levy, the first Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence at the Treasury Department, as well as others in the State Department and on Capitol Hill. When the history of Iran sanctions is written, I hope it actually also gives credit to many of the people whose names we don't know or who are not as famous as Hillary Clinton," he said. (End of quote)Then again, Hillary simply cannot tell the truth. Here's her scorecard:Admitted Lies• Chelsea was jogging around the Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001. (She was in bed watching it on TV.)• Hillary was named after Sir Edmund Hillary. (She admitted she was wrong. He climbed Mt. Everest five years after her birth.)• She was plane was under sniper fire in Bosnia. (A girl presented her with flowers at the foot of the ramp.) REMEMBER: A prominent TV news anchor was fired and banished from the industry for essentially the same type of lie!• She learned in The Wall Street Journal how to make a killing in the futures market. (It didn't cover the market back then) She and members of her law firms invested $1,000 each and turned it into $100,000 each while others lost their shirts.)* She didn't store, send or receive any classified information from her private server.*She turned all of her emails over to the Dept. of State.* She turned 95% of her emails over to the Dept. of State.*She doesn't remember whether she received and completed any training on handling classified information while she was SOS.* and on and on and on!If the US has a brick for every one of Hellery's lies we could build a double thick wall along the US Mexican border and wouldn't need a red cent from Mexico!What is true, however, is that she failed to hold together the international coalition that imposed sanctions on Iran for its nuclear weapons program. That ineffectiveness led to the US negotiating a terribly one-sided treaty, which allows Iran to gain nuclear weapons and paid them $1.5 BILLION. That money is now available to Iran to fund the purchase of rockets shot at US Navy ships in the Persian Gulf, to fund rebels in Yemen, Hezbollah and to fund the development of nuclear weapons.What Hillary and Kaine failed to tell voters is that she was ineffective in getting Russia and China to comply with the sanctions and only got tepid compliance from India and Turkey! As a result the international coalition was unraveling at the time she stepped down as SOS. Her ineffectiveness led to the US negotiating a terribly one-sided treaty, which allows Iran to gain nuclear weapons and paid them $1.5 BILLION. That money is now available to use to fund rockets, which recently have been shot as US Navy ships in the Persian Gulf.HRC also failed to effectively manage the staff at the DOS. Consequently, the Embassy in Benghazi was not properly secured resulting in the tragic deaths of patriotic Americans. Than she exercised bad judgment by purposely lying to the American people and even to the families of those that lost there lives in the attack on the US Embassy in Benghazi about who murdered their love ones and what motivated them to do so. Hillary has been caught in her emails admitting to others, including her daughter Chelsea that the attacks on the Embassy were conducted by terrorists as part of a planned and coordinated attack rather than by a crown of civilians spontaneously enraged by a You Tube video regarding Mohamed that they found offensive. (Yet, Hillary scape goated the filmmaker, ruined his career and endangered his life without so much as an apology.Hillary also oversaw a covert plan to distribute weapons utilizing rebels in Libya. Knowing that this gun running operation was being run out of Benghazi, Hillary’s DOS turned down HUNDREDS of requests for additional security in Benghazi by Ambassador Chris Stevens and his staff. As a result Ambassador Stevens and other brave members of his understaffed security force were murdered in Benghazi. The gun running plan resulted in those weapons falling into the hands of terrorist and rebel groups who oppose the US. Gaining access to these weapons was likely the reason the terrorists attacked the US Embassy in Benghazi and killed Ambassador Stevens and the other brave Americans. As this covert plan was not even known to the US Congress, could preventing Congress of finding out about the covert plan be the reason Hillary lied about the participants in and reason for the attacks of the US Embassy in Benghazi? Absolutely!If responding properly to Ambassador Stevens requests for increased security wasn’t Hellary’s call, than she failed to properly supervise her staff. Moreover, the staff member(s) who were responsible were not terminated for their poor judgment in denying Stevens’ hundreds of requests for additional security, particularly with the types of covert operations apparently being run out of Benghazi.As we all know, Hillary set up a private email server, which illegally housed classified information, That server was not properly secured and was easily subject to hacking by enemies of the US. She also gave access to the classified information on this server to staff and contractors who lacked proper security clearance. In short, she demonstrated reckless disregard for classified information and for complying with US laws.This attitude and failure of leadership pervaded the DOS. Consequently, Hillary and DOS personnel took cell phones, which contained classified information into Russia where their phones could easily be hacked. One of her top aides took files containing classified information home where persons without proper clearances could access the files. She even left a file containing classified information on the front seat of her car. Then again in the words of Hellary, "What difference does it make?" All of this demonstrates terrible management and leadership skills as well as abysmal judgment.Meanwhile, if not for the intervention of Obama and the appointment of Clinton friendly Loretta Lynch as AG, Hillary, and likely Cheryl Mills, would have been indicted and would now be facing multiple felony charges, including among others, the mishandling of classified information, obstruction of justice and perjury. Obama stacked the deck in favor of Clinton and her proteges by appointing the Clinton beholden Loretta Lynch as Attorney General. Loretta Lynch formerly was a partner at a law firm, Hogan and Hartman, (now Hogan Lovells), which represented the Clintons. Loretta Lynch also was a law partner at that same firm of none other than Cheryl Mills. Is there any wonder why the DOJ game Mills immunity from prosecution? NO! Finally, Lynch owes her government career to Billy Bob Clinton, who appointed her as US Attorney for the Eastern District of NY. It is not coincidence that Billy Bob Clinton had a private meeting will Lynch on her air plane on the tarmac of the Phoenix airport, just days before the FBI announced that it did not recommend that the DOJ indict Hillary. We now know that by appointing Lynch as AG, Obama not only protected HRC but himself.It seems that despite telling the American people that he knew nothing about HRC's private email server, Obama, using a psuedo-name send emails to HRC at her private email address. Obama has blocked the release of these emails under a claim of Executive Privilege. If, however, HRC is indicted those emails would be released for use in a criminal proceeding. In fact, Obama would most certainly be a witness in that trial. It would likely uncover that Obama too violated federal law by sending classified information to HRC on her private server. It's not possible to indict a standing president but he could be indicted if Trump wins the election. If nothing else it would greatly sully his legacy. So, Obama has two reasons to prevent HRC from being indicted, i.e., to protect himself and to protect HRC, who would preserve his progressive agenda and his legacy whereas Trump would likely repeal much of Obama's agenda.Now disclosures of emails released by Wikileaks show that while Hillary was SOS, her staff used codes on emails to identify people whose requests to meet with Hillary that should honor. Emails from the Clinton Foundation identified persons seeking an audience with Hillary using the codes, FOB or WFC VIP, i.e., Friends of Bill, or William Jefferson Clinton VIP. It seems that the DOS responded to other request by sending an email referring the party requesting an audience to the DOS and other websites for information, while those persons identified as FOB or better yet, WJC VIP got an audience with SOS HRC.Emails from Clinton DOS and Clinton Foundation Staff exposed by Wikileaks:Email A:“Need you to flag when people are friends of WJC,” wrote Caitlin Klevorick, then a senior State Department official who was juggling incoming offers of assistance being funneled to the State Department by the Clinton Foundation. “Most I can probably ID but not all.”Email B:“Is this a FOB!” Klevorick writes later, when a Clinton Foundation aide forwards a woman’s offer of medical supplies. “If not, she should go to USAID Center for International Disaster Information (CIDI),” she adds, directing the person deemed not to be a Clinton friend to a general government website.Email C:“This WJC VIP just called again from Jamaica to say Digicel is being pushed by US Army to get comms back up but is not being cleared by [the U.S. government] to deploy into Haiti to do so,” Desai wrote in an email with the subject line “Close friend of Clintons.”Will it be coincidental to find out that the persons who received these designations were donors to the Clinton Foundation and/or were responsible for Bill or HRC getting paid to give speeches. Does the apparent illegal and unethical pay to play policy of the Clintons explain how the Clintons who were broke when the left the White House have amassed a net worth of approximately $400 million, Do you really believe that they amassed that amount of money solely by giving speeches or from their retirement pay from government service? If you do would you like to buy a bridge or two over the East and West Rivers in NYC? Meanwhile, continue to watch for more Wikileaks exposure of the Clinton Foundation corruption and pay to play activities of the Clintons!And ON AND ON AND ON.....

HRC’s email escapade is perhaps the most horrifying example of top down corruption in the Executive Branch of the US Government in the last century. It is an example of how the Democratic Party has corrupted the Executive Branch of government by installing party pawns as AG, first Holder and then Lynch. It’s clear that Obama appointed Lynch as AG for the specific purpose of protecting HRC from prosecution and preventing investigation into the Clinton Foundation. Why Loretta Lynch? Because she has long standing ties to the Clintons, and to Cheryl Mills. Moreover, she is beholden to Bill Clinton who launched her government career by appointing her US Attorney for the Eastern District of NY.The AG as head of the DOJ is in a position to block any prosecution of members of the Executive Branch even if they are investigated by Congress and wrong doing is exposed. The only other option if the DOJ will not prosecute is impeachment which is a virtual impossibility in todays highly partisan Congress. You’ll never get 2/3rds of the House and the Senate to impeach and convict unless one party controls 2/3rds of both chambers! Look up how many times Holder was held in contempt of Congress or contempt of court!The FBI investigation into HRC’s emails and private server was a fraud. Lynch has long standing relationships with the Clintons. She was a partner at Hogan & Hartson (now Hogan Lovells) a law firm that represented the Clintons. Cheryl Mills who has worked for the Clinton’s since 1993 was an attorney at H & H. Sandy Berger, who was a speech writer for Jimmy Carter and worked as an advisor for Michael Dukakis and as Bill Clinton’s National Security Advisor also was a partner at H&H. Berger, a partner at H & H left the firm several times to assume Democratic Campaign or government positions working for Democrat elected officials but came back to H & H between those jobs and went back to H & H after Bill CLinton’s presidency ended. The Clintons, not coincidentally not only sourced and placed employees at H & H but also hired H & H to go personal legal work for them. It's not coincidence that Mills, a witness and potential co-conspirator in the case, was permitted by the FBI, which reports to Lynch, to sit in on the questioning of HRC. It's not coincidence that the FBI, which could have subpoenaed Mill's lap top, agreed to destroy the lap top's hard drive so it could never be used against Mills. It also could not be used to embarrass the FBI, because it contained info that would have exposed the corruption in their decision not to recommend HRC be indicted. The FBI wanted to destroy Mills’ hard drive. They used the excuse that it was part of the immunity agreement given to get access to the laptop as an excuse.Lynch also is beholden to Billy Bob Clinton for her government career. He appointed her US Attorney for the Eastern District of NY. It's no coincidence that Billy Bob met privately with Lynch on her government plane when it was on the tarmac at the Phoenix airport just days before Comey announced that the FBI was not recommending that HRC be indicted.Lynch also is beholden to Obama who appointed her once again to be a US Attorney and then appointed her as AG. Did Obama expect a quid pro quo? You bet he did. It seems that despite telling the American people that he knew nothing about HRC's private email server, Obama, using a psuedo-name send emails to HRC at her private email address. Obama has blocked the release of these emails under a claim of Executive Privilege. If, however, HRC is indicted those emails would be released for use in a criminal proceeding. In fact, Obama would most certainly be a witness in that trial. It would likely uncover that Obama too violated federal law by sending classified information to HRC on her private server. It's not possible to indict a standing president but he could be indicted if Trump wins the election. If nothing else it would greatly sully his legacy. So, Obama has two reasons to prevent HRC from being indicted, i.e., to protect himself and to protect HRC, who would preserve his progressive agenda and his legacy whereas Trump would likely repeal much of Obama's agenda.This investigation stinks with corruption from the top down. Comey stated that HRC lied to the FBI and to the Congress while under oath. When asked why the FBI wasn't pursing perjury charges he said it wasn't part of the FBI's investigation. Apparently, obstruction of justice was not part of the FBI investigation either, since the server hard drive of HRC was wiped clean via Bleach Bit after Congress had issued a subpoena and a preservation order for the hard drive. That is blatant obstruction of justice and contempt of Congress.It's coming more and more to light. It will eventually come out in more detail that the large majority of the members of the team at the FBI ,which Comey likes to refer to as “the team”, did not agree with his decision that the FBI not recommend to indict HRC. Comey when pressed during his testimony to Congress said that the FBI team of roughly 100 FBI personnel that worked on the Clinton private server matter was unanimously behind the FBI recommendation not to indict HRC. We know already that this wasn't unanimous. Rather, it seams the overwhelming majority of the team members disagreed with the FBI's recommendation to the DOJ. This will all come out as some of those people leave the FBI. Comey, clearly under pressure from Lynch and Obama, has damaged the reputation of the FBI and the morale of the staff at the FBI. Why hasn’t more info regarding discontent in the FBI come out? The members of the team were required to sign nondisclosure agreements before they were put on the team. They would be fired, and God knows what else if they speak out publicly or are caught leaking information.After Obama leaves Comey will get another $6 million a year job at Martin Marietta or the like as recompense for his cooperation. He'll likely leave the FBI because he will not have the support of his staff or the respect of Congress which has oversight authority over the FBI.The way the FBI handled the investigation is very atypical for an FBI investigation. More importantly the way the FBI handled the investigation is indicative of it’s intent never to indict HRC and to interfere with anyone else could. The FBI typically convenes a grand jury when it conducts an investigation such as the one into Hillary’s emails. Then when they need information they subpoena witnesses and subpoena hard evidence like hard drives, etc.. Witnesses are questioned under oath. Transcripts are made of those sessions. The FBI/DOJ don’t give out immunity deals until they are virtually positive they are going to get valuable information that they can use in their case. If the party then fails to come forth with that information they retract the immunity. Virtually every party in interest in this case receive immunity from the DOJ.In the Clinton case there was no grand jury because Lynch would not give up the power over whether to indict to not to a grand jury. There was no way Lynch was going to permit HRC or her surrogates to be indicted! Witnesses were called in to give statements and were not put under oath so it would be more difficult to prosecute them for perjury. Likewise, no transcripts were made of the sessions, Instead the FBI took notes. Again making it more difficult to prosecute people for perjury. Immunity was given to people who provided no useful information allegedly to get them to hand over hard drives that the FBI could have subpoenaed anyway. Then the hard drives where destroyed so that none of the information could be used against the witnesses. Perhaps most importantly to the FBI destroying the hard drives assure the FBI that any future investigation into this fiasco of an FBI investigation would not embarrass the FBI by turning up evidence against Clinton and her co-conspirators that would make it clear that the FBI ignored incriminating evidence in order to protect HRC and her surrogates.That's not all of the corruption. Three independent FBI offices in 3 different cities requested permission to investigate the Clinton Foundation. Surprise! Surprise! The DOJ, under Lynch, rejected ALL THREE REQUESTS! That is not DOJ policy or protocol. It's blatant protection of the Clintons. So do people think that the DOS usually grants meeting with the SOS on the basis of whether the party requesting the meeting is a FOB or WJC VIP,i.e. a Friend of Bill or a William Jefferson Clinton VIP?Email messages exposed by Wikileaks:“Need you to flag when people are friends of WJC,” wrote Caitlin Klevorick, then a senior State Department official who was juggling incoming offers of assistance being funneled to the State Department by the Clinton Foundation. “Most I can probably ID but not all.”“Is this a FOB!” Klevorick writes later, when a Clinton Foundation aide forwards a woman’s offer of medical supplies. “If not, she should go to USAID Center for International Disaster Information (CIDI),” she adds, directing the person deemed not to be a Clinton friend to a general government website.“This WJC VIP just called again from Jamaica to say Digicel is being pushed by US Army to get comms back up but is not being cleared by [the U.S. government] to deploy into Haiti to do so,” Desai wrote in an email with the subject line “Close friend of Clintons.”Will it be coincidental to find out that the persons who received these designations were donors to the Clinton Foundation and/or were responsible for Bill or HRC getting paid to give speeches? Continue to watch for more Wikileaks exposure of the Clinton Foundation corruption and pay to play activities of the Clintons!Corruption is not the only reason not to vote to HRC. HRC’s only two accomplishments in life were graduating from Yale LS and marrying Bill Clinton. She is the epitome of someone with good credentials, a lot of impressive titles and NO ACCOMPLISHMENTS!After law school HRC took the Bar exam in DC and in Arkansas. She had accepted a position with a large private firm in DC but failed the bar exam. (The average passing rate on the DC Bar Exam exceeds 50%. So Hillary’s score was in the bottom 49 or less percent, i.e., not an indication of a genius or of legal scholarship.) She passed the Arkansas Bar and decided to follow her boyfriend Bill Clinton to Little Rock. There she worked for some public interest groups before joining a private law firm in Little Rock Arkansas. Lawyers in the community considered her to be just a so-so lawyer who made partner at the firm because her husband was politically connected and was in a position to refer business to the law firm. When she left Arkansas, the Whitewater corruption fiasco was discovered. The firm became embroiled in the investigation and closed down. One of her friends and a partner in the law firm, Vince Foster, was mysteriously found dead in his office. We now know that HRC also had a protracted and open affair with Vince Foster. Mr. Foster's office files later surfaced in Hillary’s possession in DC.As First Lady she tried to get the spotlight by championing “universal health care.” There was no political appetite for government run health care and the structure of the system she proposed was so complex and convoluted that the cost of the system would have been astronomical. After universal health care was exposed as Hillary’s folly she faded into the WH woodwork for the remainder of Bill’s Presidency, other than to show up to defend Bill for his sexual predator activities and to threaten and crucify the women he abused. Of course, it was all “a vast right wing conspiracy.”She was only elected Senator on the coat tails of Bill Clinton. With his help she was able to raise campaign funds for herself and other member of the NY Democratic contingent, like Shumer, Rangel, etc.. so they supported her, She spent most of her time in the Senate raising campaign funds for herself and her cohort and networking to gain support for her planned run for the Presidency. In her entire time in the Senate she sponsored a whole 3 successful but insignificant bills. One was to name a post office in NY State.Hillary will speak about the legislation she co-sponsored. That is code for legislation that she did no work on but wanted to take credit for because she thought it was likely to pass. While occasionally bills are co-sponsored by just a few members of Congress who do the heavy lifting, i.e, draft and promote the legislation. That is not the case with the bills that Hillary co-sponsored. The type Hillary co-sponsored were sponsored by other legislators and when the heavy lifting was completed the bills were circulated to get sponsorship from a large number of other legislators to insure the bills passage and bi-partisan support. These are opportunities for members of Congress to look like they are doing something when they are not really doing anything. They are merely co-sponsoring legislation that they know will pass and that they do not object to in order to get some credit to promote to their constituents back in their home states.Next, Hillary was appointed SOS as part of a deal to get Bill Clinton’s Democratic political machine to support Barak Obama, who Bill Clinton despises. As Sec’y of State her policies and actions were a continuous display of bad judgement, ineffectiveness, non-existent management and leadership skills and lack of ethics. Her judgement on policy matters and actions were consistently very bad, be it Libya, the Iraqi withdraw, Syria, Honduras, the Russian reset, etc.. all were failed policies. While Tim Kaine takes credit for Hillary pulling together the international coalition to impose economic sanctions on Iran, that is not entirely true.According to ABC news who investigated this claim made by HRC and Tim Kaine:(Quote) Mark Dubowitz, executive director of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, noted that “…Clinton's State Department does deserve credit for getting the United Nations Security Council on board with tough sanctions.But she isn't giving Congress enough credit for its work, Dubowitz said. It significantly understates the pivotal role that Congress played in originating and passing some of the most effective energy and financial sanctions," he said of Clinton's comments. Former congressman Howard Berman, a Democrat from California who co-sponsored the 2010 Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Divestment Act, praised Clinton's corralling of the U.N. Security Council… Referring to Clinton's assessment of her role, Berman said, "There's some almost automatic human tendency in politics to think that one's role was the critical additional factor in making something happen." Dubowitz said he hoped that over time, recognition for the Iran sanctions will also go to "unsung heroes" like Stuart Levy, the first Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence at the Treasury Department, as well as others in the State Department and on Capitol Hill. When the history of Iran sanctions is written, I hope it actually also gives credit to many of the people whose names we don't know or who are not as famous as Hillary Clinton," he said. (End of quote)Then again, Hillary simply cannot tell the truth. Here's her scorecard:Admitted Lies• Chelsea was jogging around the Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001. (She was in bed watching it on TV.)• Hillary was named after Sir Edmund Hillary. (She admitted she was wrong. He climbed Mt. Everest five years after her birth.)• She was plane was under sniper fire in Bosnia. (A girl presented her with flowers at the foot of the ramp.)• She learned in The Wall Street Journal how to make a killing in the futures market. (It didn't cover the market back then) She and members of her law firms invested $1,000 each and turned it into $100,000 each while others lost their shirts.)What is true, however, is that she failed to hold together the international coalition that imposed sancions on Iran for it's nuclear weapons program. That ineffectiveness led to the US negotiating a terribly one sided treaty, which allows Iran to gain nuclear weapons and paid them $1.5 BILLION. That money is now available to Iran to fund the purchase of rockets shot at US Navy ships in the Persian Gulf, to fund rebels in Yemen, Hezbollah and to fund the development of nuclear weapons.What Hillary and Kaine fail to tell voters is that she was ineffective in getting Russia and China, and to a lesser extent, India and Turkey, to complying with the economic sanctions. As a result the international coalition was unravelling at the time she stepped down as SOS. That ineffectiveness led to the US negotiating a terribly one sided treaty, which allows Iran to gain nuclear weapons and paid them $1.5 BILLION. That money is now available to use to fund rockets which recently have been shot as US Navy ships in the Persian Gulf.HRC also failed to effectively manage the staff at the DOS. Consequently, the Embassy in Benghazi was not properly secured resulting in the tragic deaths of patriotic Americans. Than she purposely lied to the American people and even to the families of those that lost there lives in the attack on the US Embassy in Benghazi about who murdered their love ones and what motivated them to do so. Hillary has been caught in her emails admitting to others, including her daughter Chelsea, that the attacks on the Embassy were conducted by terrorists as part of a planned and coordinated attack rather than by a crown of civilians spontaneously enraged by a You Tube video regarding Mohamed that they found offensive. (Yet, Hillary scape goated the film maker, ruined his career and endangered his life without so much as an apology.Hillary also oversaw a covert plan to distribute weapons utilizing rebels in Libya. Knowing that this gun running operation was being run out of Benghazi, Hillary’s DOS turned down HUNDREDS of requests for additional security in Benghazi by Ambassador Chris Stevens and his staff. As a result Ambassador Stevens and other brave members of his understaffed security force were murdered in Benghazi. The gun running plan resulted in those weapons falling into the hands of terrorist and rebel groups who oppose the US. Gaining access to these weapons was likely the reason the terrorists attacked the US Embassy in Benghazi and killed Ambassador Stevens and the other brave Americans. As this covert plan was not even known to the US Congress, could preventing Congress of finding out about the covert plan be the reason Hillary lied about the participants in and reason for the attacks of the US Embassy in Benghazi? Absolutely!As we all know, Hillary set up a private email server which illegally housed classified information, That server was not properly secured and was easily subject to hacking by enemies of the US. She also gave access to the classified information on this server to staff and contractors and attorneys who lacked proper security clearance. In short, she demonstrated reckless disregard for classified information and for complying with US laws.This attitude and failure of leadership pervaded the DOS. Consequently, Hillary and DOS personnel took cell phones which contained classified information into Russia where there phones could easily be hacked. One of her top aides, Huma Abedin, took files containing classified information home where persons without proper clearances could access the files. She even left a file containing classified information on the front seat of her car. Now we discover that Abedin kept info on a laptop share with her husband, the disgraced former US Congressman, Weiner, who engages in sexting with 15 y.o.s, married women, etc… Just yesterday, the information regarding Weiner’s access to government information became so problematic that the FBI announced it was reopening it’s investigation into HRC’s emails and her private server. Democrats are incensed “at the timing” of course and not the pattern of behavior of HRC and her staff. Then again in the words of Hellary, "What difference does it make?"All of this demonstrates terrible management and leadership skills as well as abysmal judgement.Meanwhile, if not for the intervention of Obama and the appointment of Clinton friendly Loretta Lynch as AG, Hillary, and likely Cheryl Mills, would have been indicted and would now be facing multiple felony charges, including among others, the mishandling of classified information, obstruction of justice and perjury. Obama stacked the deck in favor of Clinton and her proteges by appointing the Clinton beholden Loretta Lynch as Attorney General. Loretta Lynch formerly was a partner at a law firm, Hogan and Hartman, (now Hogan Lovells) that represented the Clintons. Loretta Lynch also was a law partner at that same firm of none other than Cheryl Mills. Is there any wonder why the DOJ game Mills immunity from prosecution? NO! Finally, Lynch owes her government career to Billy Bob Clinton, who appointed her as US Attorney for the Eastern District of NY. It is not coincidence that Billy Bob Clinton had a private meeting will Lynch on her air plane on the tarmac of the Phoenis airport, just days before the FBI announced that it did not recommend that the DOJ indict Hillary.Now disclosures of emails released by Wikileaks show that while Hillary was SOS, her staff used codes on emails to identify people whose requests to meet with Hillary that should honor. Emails from the Clinton Foundation identified persons seeking an audience with Hillary using the codes, FOB or WFC VIP, i.e., Friends of Bill, or William Jefferson Clinton VIP. It seems that other requests were responded to by DOS referring them to the DOS and other websites for information, while these persons identified as FOB or better yet, WJC VIP got an audience with SOS HRC.Emails from Clinton DOS and Clinton Foundation Staff exposed by Wikileaks:Email A:“Need you to flag when people are friends of WJC,” wrote Caitlin Klevorick, then a senior State Department official who was juggling incoming offers of assistance being funneled to the State Department by the Clinton Foundation. “Most I can probably ID but not all.”Email B:“Is this a FOB!” Klevorick writes later, when a Clinton Foundation aide forwards a woman’s offer of medical supplies. “If not, she should go to USAID Center for International Disaster Information (CIDI),” she adds, directing the person deemed not to be a Clinton friend to a general government website.Email C:“This WJC VIP just called again from Jamaica to say Digicel is being pushed by US Army to get comms back up but is not being cleared by [the U.S. government] to deploy into Haiti to do so,” Desai wrote in an email with the subject line “Close friend of Clintons.”Will it be coincidental to find out that the persons who received these designations were donors to the Clinton Foundation and/or were responsible for Bill or HRC getting paid to give speeches. Continue to watch for more Wikileaks exposure of the Clinton Foundation corruption and pay to play activities of the Clintons!Does the apparent illegal and unethical pay to play policy of the Clintons explain how the Clintons who were broke when the left the White House have amassed a net worth of approximately $400 million, Do you really believe that they amassed that amount of money solely by giving speeches or from their retirement pay from government service? If you do would you like to buy a bridge or two over the East and West Rivers in NYC?And ON AND ON AND ON.....