Job Order Entering A Job Order. This Form May Be Used To Assist In Establishing Le: Fill & Download for Free

I was surprised by the brevity of the Sunday Times regarding the leaked Operation Yellowhammer report presented to ministers last month. I had expected a proper impact assessment document with quantitative analytics into probabilities and ranges of economic and services disruptions expected (which would be in most professional impact assessments). But maybe this is just the high-level summary here. Anyway, in case you have not seen even this high-level summary, here are apparently the highlights of the leaked document:THE YELLOWHAMMER REPORTNo-deal Brexit preparations: the leaked Operation Yellowhammer documentThe Sunday TimesBASE SCENARIOWhen the UK ceases to be a member of the European Union in October 2019, all rights and reciprocal arrangements with the EU end.The UK reverts fully to “third country” status. The relationship between the UK and the European Union as a whole is unsympathetic, with many member states (under pressure from the European Commission) unwilling to engage bilaterally and implementing protections unilaterally, though some member states may be more understanding.No bilateral deals have been concluded with individual member states, with the exception of the reciprocal agreement on social security co-ordination with the Republic of Ireland. EU citizens living in the UK can retain broadly all rights and status that they were entitled before the UK’s exit from the EU, at the point of exit.Public and business readiness for no-deal will remain at a low level, and will decrease to lower levels, because the absence of a clear decision on the form of EU Exit (customs union, no deal etc) does not provide a concrete situation for third parties to prepare for. Readiness will be further limited by increasing EU Exit fatigue caused by the second extension of article 50.Business readiness will not be uniform – in general large businesses that work across sectors are likely to have better developed counting plans than small and medium-size businesses. Business readiness will be compounded by seasonal effects and factors such as warehouse availability.Private sector companies’ behaviour will be governed by commercial considerations, unless they are influenced otherwise.Her Majesty’s government will act in accordance with the rule of law, including by identifying the powers it is using to take specific actions.Risks associated with autumn and winter, such as severe weather, flooding and seasonal flu, could exacerbate any effects and stretch the resources of partners and responders.KEY PLANNING ASSUMPTIONSExit dayFor the purpose of freight flow and traffic management, as October 31 is a Thursday, Day 1 of Exit is now on a Friday rather than the weekend, which is not to our advantage. Exit Day may coincide with the half-term holiday, which varies across the UK.Member statesIn a small number of instances where the impacts of Brexit would be felt negatively in the EU as well as in the UK, member states may act in a way that could benefit the UK.Channel portsFrance will impose EU mandatory controls on UK goods on Day 1 of No Deal and has built infrastructure and IT systems to manage and process customs declarations and to support a risk-based control regime. On Day 1 of No Deal, 50%-85% of HGVs travelling via the short straits may not be ready for French customs. The lack of trader readiness combined with limited space in French ports to hold “unready” HGVs could reduce the flow rate to 40%-60% of current levels within one day.The worst disruption to the short Channel crossings might last 3 months before flow rates rise to about 50%-70% (as more traders get prepared), although disruption could continue much longer. In the event of serious disruption, the French might act to ensure some flow through the short Channel crossings.Disruption to Channel flow would also cause significant queues in Kent and delays to HGVs attempting to use the routes to travel to France. In a reasonable worst-case scenario, HGVs could face a maximum delay of 1½-2½ days before being able to cross the border. HGVs caught up in congestion in the UK will be unable to return to the EU to collect another load and some logistics firms may decide to avoid the route. Analysis to date has suggested a low risk of significant sustained queues at ports outside Kent that have high volumes of EU traffic, but the Border Delivery Group will continue to work directly with stakeholders at those ports to support planning readiness.Border checksUK citizens travelling to and from the EU may be subject to increased immigration checks at border posts. This may lead to passenger delays at St Pancras, Cheriton (Channel tunnel) and Dover, where border controls are juxtaposed. Depending on what plans EU member states put in place to cope with these increased immigration checks, it is likely delays will occur for UK arrivals and departures at EU airports and ports. This could cause some disruption on transport services. Travellers may decide to use alternative routes to complete their journey.Drugs and diseasei) The Border Delivery Group/Department for Transport planning assumption on reduced flow rates describes a pre-mitigation reasonable worst-case flow rate that could be as low as 40% on Day 1 of No Deal via the short straits [main Channel crossings], with significant disruption lasting up to six months. Unmitigated, this will have an impact on the supply of medicines and medical supplies.Supply chains for medicines and medical products rely heavily on the short straits, which makes them particularly vulnerable to severe delays: three-quarters of medicines come via the short straits. Supply chains are also highly regulated and require transportation that meets strict Good Distribution Practices. This can include limits on transit times and temperature-controlled conditions. While some products can be stockpiled, others cannot because of short shelf lives. It will not be practical to stockpile six months’ supplies. The Department for Health and Social Care is developing a multi-layered approach to mitigate these risks.ii) Any disruption that reduces, delays or stops the supply of medicines for UK veterinary use would reduce our ability to prevent and control disease outbreaks, with potential harm to animal health and welfare, the environment and wider food safety and availability, as well as, in the case of zoonotic diseases, posing a risk to human health. Industry stockpiling will not be able to match the 4-12 weeks’ stockpiling that took place in March 2019. Air freight capacity and the special import scheme are not a financially viable way to mitigate risks associated with veterinary medicine availability issues.Food and wateri) Certain types of fresh food supply will decrease. Critical elements of the food supply chain (such as ingredients, chemicals and packaging) may be in short supply. In combination, these two factors will not cause an overall shortage of food in the UK but will reduce availability and choice and increase the price, which will affect vulnerable groups. The UK growing season will have come to an end, so the agri-food supply chain will be under increased pressure for food retailers. Government will not be able to fully anticipate all effects on the agri-food supply chain. There is a risk that panic buying will disrupt food supplies.ii) Public water services are likely to remain largely unaffected, thanks to actions now being taken by water companies. The most significant single risk is a failure in the chemicals supply chain. The likelihood of this is considered low, and the impact is likely to be local, affecting only hundreds of thousands of people. Water companies are well prepared for any disruption: they have significant stocks of all critical chemicals, extensive monitoring of their chemicals supply chains (including transport and deliveries) and sharing agreements in place. In the event of a supply chain failure, or the need to respond rapidly to other water supply incidents, urgent action may need to be taken to make sure people continue to have access to clean water.Law and orderLaw enforcement data and information-sharing between the UK and the EU will be disrupted.Financial services and insuranceSome cross-border UK financial services will be disrupted. A small minority of insurance payments from UK insurers into the EU may be delayed.DataThe EU will not have made a data decision with regard to the UK before exit. This will disrupt the flow of personal data from the EU, where an alternative legal basis for transfer is not in place. In no-deal, an adequacy assessment could take years.FuelTraffic disruption caused by border delays could affect fuel distribution in the local area, particularly if traffic queues In Kent block the Dartford crossing, which would disrupt fuel supply in London and the southeast. Customer behaviour could lead to shortages in other parts of the country.Tariffs make UK petrol exports to the EU uncompetitive. Industry had plans to mitigate the impact on refinery margins and profitability, but UK government policy to set petrol import tariffs at 0% inadvertently undermines these plans. This leads to big financial losses and the closure of two refineries (which are converted to import terminals) with about 2,000 direct job losses. Resulting strike action at refineries would lead to disruptions to fuel availability for 1-2 weeks in the regions they directly supply. Government analysis of the impact of no-deal on refineries continues.Northern IrelandOn Day 1 of No Deal, Her Majesty’s government will activate the “no new checks with limited exceptions” model announced on March 13, establishing a legislative framework and essential operations and system on the ground, to avoid an immediate risk of a return to a hard border on the UK side.The model is likely to prove unsustainable because of economic, legal and biosecurity risks. With the UK becoming a “third [non-EU] country”, the automatic application of EU tariffs and regulatory requirements for goods entering Ireland will severely disrupt trade. The expectation is that some businesses will stop trading or relocate to avoid either paying tariffs that will make them uncompetitive or trading illegally; others will continue to trade but will experience higher costs that may be passed on to consumers. The agri-food sector will be hardest hit, given its reliance on complicated cross-border supply chains and the high tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade.Disruption to key sectors and job losses are likely to result in protests and direct action with road blockades. Price and other differentials are likely to lead to the growth of the illegitimate economy. This will be particularly severe in border communities where criminal and dissident groups already operate with greater freedom. Given the tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade, there will be pressure to agree new arrangements to supersede the Day 1 model within days or weeks.Energy suppliesDemand for energy will be met, and there will be no disruption to electricity or gas interconnectors. In Northern Ireland there will not be immediate disruption to electricity supply on Day 1. A rapid split of SEM could occur months or years after the EU Exit. In this event there would not be issues about security of supply. However, there will probably be marked price rises for electricity customers (business and domestic), with associated wider economic and political effects. Some participants could exit the market, exacerbating economic and political effects.GibraltarBecause of the imposition of checks at its border with Spain (and the knock-on effect of delays from the UK to the EU), Gibraltar will see disruption to the supply of goods (including food and medicines) and to shipments of waste, plus delays of four-plus hours for at least a few months in the movement of frontier workers, residents and tourists across the border.Prolonged border delays over the longer term are likely to harm Gibraltar’s economy. As on the UK mainland, cross-border services and data flow will be disrupted. Despite the time extension to the UK’s exit from the EU, Gibraltar has still not taken the decisions to invest in contingency infrastructure (such as port adjustments and waste management equipment) and there are still concerns that Gibraltar will not have passed all necessary legislation for no-deal, opening up legal risks mainly for the government of Gibraltar. Gibraltar continues to plan for less significant border delays than in our Yellowhammer scenario. Crown dependencies may be affected by supply chain disruption.Brits in Europei) UK nationals will lose their EU citizenship and can expect to lose associated rights and access to services over time, or be required to access them on a different basis. All member states have now published legislative proposals, but not all have passed legislation to secure all rights for UK nationals.There is a mixed picture across member states in terms of the level of generosity and detail in the legislation. In some member states, UK nationals need to take action now. Complex administrative procedures within member states, language barriers and uncertainty regarding the UK political situation are contributing to some UK nationals being slow to take action. Demands for help on Her Majesty’s government will increase significantly, including an increase in consular inquiries and more complex and time-consuming consular assistance cases for vulnerable UK nationals.Cross-government support, including continued close engagement and clear communications from UK government departments and the departmental agencies, will be needed to help manage the demand.ii) An EU member state would continue to pay a pension it currently pays to a UK national living in the EU.iii) The commission and individual member states do not agree to extend the current healthcare arrangements for UK state pensioners and tourists beyond October 31, 2019, and refuse offers by the UK to fund treatments. Member states take no further action to guarantee healthcare for UK nationals and treat them in the same way as the other “third country” nationals. UK pensioners, workers, travellers and students will need to access healthcare in different ways, depending on the country. Healthcare systems may require people to demonstrate residency and current or previous employment, to enter a social insurance scheme or to purchase private insurance. Member states should treat people with urgent needs but may require them to pay after the fact. There is a risk of disruption for patients, and a minority could face substantial costs.Protests and policeProtests and counter-protests will take place across the UK, using up police resources. There may also be a rise in public disorder and community tensions.FishingUp to 282 EU and European Economic Area nations’ fishing vessels could enter illegally or are already fishing in UK waters: up to 129 vessels in English waters, 100 in Scottish waters, 40 in Welsh waters and 13 in Northern Irish waters on Day 1. This is likely to cause anger and frustration in the UK catching sector, which could lead to clashes between fishing vessels and an increase in non-compliance in the domestic fleet.Competing demands on UK government and maritime departmental agencies and their assets could put enforcement and response capabilities at risk, especially in the event of illegal fishing, border violations (smuggling and illegal migration) and any disorder or criminality arising as a result, eg violent disputes or blockading of ports.The poorLow-income groups will be disproportionately affected by rises in the price of food and fuel.Social careThere is an assumption that there will be no big changes in adult social care on the day after EU Exit. The adult social care market is already fragile because of the declining financial viability of providers.An increase in inflation after the UK’s EU exit would affect providers of adult social care through increasing staff and supply costs, and might lead to failure within 2-3 months for smaller providers and 4-6 months for larger ones. There are also local risks — transport or staff disruption, severe winter weather or flu — that could exacerbate existing market fragility and that cumulatively could stretch the resources of providers and local authorities.Intelligence will continue to be gathered to prepare for any effects on the sector, including closure of services and handing-back of contracts that are not part of the normal market function. In addition, by mid-August we will look at the status of preparations in four local authorities identified as concerns.The good news, of course, is the above is managed by a UK cabinet with a combined record of exactly zero in delivering any national policies successfully, and this cabinet is led by this man (with an identical zero record):ADDENDUMThe government was finally compelled to release the Operation Yellowhammer report which can be found on the link in this following answer:What do you think about the Yellowhammer impact document being released?Apparently, there are different versions of the report and the government’s version is claimed to be the “worst case assumptions” even though it is practically identical to the Sunday Times’ “Base Scenario”. So we are still not at all clear why the government changed the title.

The brutality of Hitler’s regime impacted several communities and has changed the social understanding of many marginalized groups to this day. Often in the LGBT community, the impact of the Holocaust is framed through the experiences of cis gay men, who were one of the most targeted groups during WW2. But what is often left out of this picture is the suffering of trans people who were persecuted under the Third Reich. This is an important and largely forgotten portion of trans history.Trans Visibility Pre-WW2Trans visibility before the Third Reich may not have been mainstream, but this community began experiencing acceptance from prominent medical professionals in the 1920’s and ’30s. New experimental medical procedures allowed trans people to medically transition by taking hormones and getting surgery. One recipient of such experimental treatment was Lili Elbe, the first documented woman to receive gender reassignment surgery. Lili Elbe was a bisexual trans-intersex woman born in Denmark in 1882.A portrait of Lili Elbe (1882-1931)A painting of Lili Elbe by her ex-wife Gerda GottilebLili was assigned male at birth and given the name Einar Wegener. While living as a man, Lili was a successful painter and married fellow artist Gerda Gottileb. As a favor to her wife, Lili began cross dressing to pose as female models for Gerda’s popular paintings. After cross dressing, she was convinced that she was in fact transgender and come out to her wife. In 1912 Lili and Gerda moved to Paris, where she could live openly as a woman and her wife could be actively lesbian. Lili regularly posed as female models in Gerda’s painting, and in 1913 the Danish public was shocked when it was discovered that the beautiful women in Gerda’s paintings had actually been based off of Lili, who publicly identified as a man. In the 1920’s and 1930’s Lili Elbe began transitioning by presenting as female in public, but she was introduced to others as Einar’s sister. Only the closest friends of the couple knew that Lili was transitioning.Lili Elbe sought the treatment of several medical professionals for help with her transition. Two doctors diagnosed her as homosexual and one doctor diagnosed her as intersex after the discovery of rudimentary ovaries during a medical examination. In 1930, Elbe went to Germany to meet with sexologist Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld, she was then introduced to Dr. Warnekros in the Dresden Women’s Clinic. Under the supervision of Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld, Lili had her first surgery in 1930 which removed her testicles. Her four following surgeries were carried out by Dr. Warnekros. There were several attempts to transplant a functioning uterus, taken from a 26 year old woman, but they were eventually removed due to rejection and several complications.Lili Elbe was able to legally change her name and was even able to obtain a passport under her name. After she received her surgery, Lili was outed in national newspapers and went into hiding. Her marriage to Gerda was invalidated by the King of Denmark in October of 1930. Gerda went on to marry a military officer and moved to Morocco. Lili stopped painting after her surgery and accepted the marriage proposal of an unknown man, who was a long time friend of hers. Nearing the age of 50, Lili underwent a fifth operation to transplant a uterus so that she could have children with her fiancé. Three months after her surgery, Lili died due to complications and organ rejection. She is buried in Dresden, Germany.In 1933 Ernst Ludwig Hathorn Jacobson (using the pseudonym Niels Hoyer) published a book, Man Into Woman based on the life of Lili Elbe that featured several interviews with her. Several names in the book were edited at the request of Lili to protect her loved ones. This book remains an important piece of early history that showcases the lives of prominent trans women. Man Into Woman can be purchased at this link:http://www.amazon.com/Man-into-Woman-Niels-Hoyer/dp/B000KDPGV0/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1415635655&sr=1-2Early Terminology and Research of Trans IdentitiesDuring the 1910s through 1930s, there was a dramatic shift in the medical community’s acceptance and understanding of sexuality and gender. A pioneer of this shift towards acceptance was lead by Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld. Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld was a gay Jewish-German sexologist who founded Institut für Sexualwissenschaft or the Institute for the Science of Sexuality/Institute of Sexology. Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld wrote extensively on the subject of queer sexuality and transgender identity. In 1910, he published Die Transvestiten, known in English asTransvestites: The Erotic Drive to Cross Dresshttp://www.amazon.com/Transvestites-Erotic-Drive-Concepts-Sexuality/dp/1591021685/ref=la_B001HQ09LG_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1416611721&sr=1-2In his groundbreaking work, Dr. Hirschfeld coined the term transvestite and transsexualism as a clinical category. He argued that transvestites, the term used to describe trans people, were not necessarily homosexual. Dr. Hirschfeld and his colleagues were the first in Europe to distinguish between sexual orientation and gender.In 1919 Dr. Hirschfeld established the Institute of Sexology in Berlin, the first of it’s kind in the world. This private institute was created for research, therapy, counseling, and more. Transgender people were welcomed as clients at the institute and staffed certain departments. Surgical services and treatment were offered at the institute, one of the most famous clients of Dr. Hirschfled was Lili Elbe. Dr. Hirschfeld also worked with Berlin’s police department to curb the trend of arrests of trans people on the charge of prostitution.Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld“Le Professeur Hirschfeld entre deux ‘patients’” (Professor Hirschfeld sitting between two patients)In 1933 the Nazis seized power of Germany under the regime of the Third Reich. At the time Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld was on a world tour and did not return to Germany, eventually exiling himself to France. Dr. Hirschfeld was an outspoken advocate for gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and feminist rights. He was an immediate target of the Nazis, and in 1933 the entire library of his institute was thrown outside and set on fire. Dr. Hirschfeld died of a heart attack in 1935, while in exile in France. The Institute of Sexology itself was converted to a Nazi propaganda center by the Third Reich.Public burning of the library of Institut für Sexualwissenschaft (Institute of Sexology) by NazisTreatment of Trans People Under Hitler’s RegimeIn 1933, the Nazi regime launched their assault against the queer and trans community of Germany. LGBTQ clubs and organizations were banned and raided across Berlin. In 1935, the Nazi’s expanded paragraph 175 to pursue any “lewd” acts and convict gay men and lesbian women. Paragraph 175 was adopted in 1871 to imprison gay men who participated in sex acts. Under paragraph 175, Nazis sent convicted gay and bisexual men to concentration camps where they were forced to wear the inverted pink triangle. Lesbian and bisexual women bore an inverted black triangle, representing “a-socials”.Nazi chart showing the badges used to classify various "undesirable" groupsOn November 11, 1933, the Hamburg City Administration asked the Head of Police to “pay special attention to transvestites” and to “deliver them to the concentration camps.”. In 1938 the Institute of Forensic Medicine recommended that the “phenomena of transvestism” be “exterminated from public life.” The Institute went on to state, “draconian measures by the government against stubborn and hard-headed transvestites are … adequate.” However, for the most part Nazis made little distinction between trans people and cis queer men and women. Trans women who were sent to concentration camps wore inverted pink triangles along with cis men. And trans men wore inverted black triangles with cis women.Unknown holocaust victims entering a concentration camp, showing the inverted pink triangle displayed on the left breast signifying homosexual men and transgender women.Most people sentenced under paragraph 175 served time in state prisons rather than death camps. The total number of people imprisoned in concentration camps under paragraph 175 is estimated between 5,000-15,000, with a death rate of 60-75%.Trans men received a similar treatment to lesbian and bisexual women at this time. Due to extreme gender roles, most trans men and cis lesbian women were not considered a threat to the “Aryan” race because they could still bear children for Germany. Laboring under strict gender roles, these women and trans men could only work low-wage jobs, which caused severe economic hardships, hindering their ability to flee Germany. Trans men and cis lesbian women who couldn’t hide or flee were often arrested or were under the constant threat of having their meeting places violently raided. Few trans men and cis lesbian women were sent to camps on the sole basis of their identity, but if they were they often were placed in camp brothels.Charlotte von Mahlsdorf, Trans Woman and Survivor of Germany’s Brutal RegimesCharlotte von Mahlsdorf, circa 1992Charlotte von Mahlsdorf was a German transgender women, who played a major role in organizing the larger LGBQT+ community throughout her life. Charlotte was born on March 18, 1928 in Berlin-Mahlsdorf as Lothar Berfelde to her mother Gretchen Gaupp and father Max Berfelde. Her mother was a typical housewife. Her father was an avid member of the Nazi political party, and quickly rose to a leadership position by the early 1920's. Charlotte’s father was extremely abusive to her as a child and towards her mother. Ever since she was a child, Charlotte was extremely feminine and was encouraged to be herself by her mother.In her adolescence, Charlotte worked as an assistant clearing out furniture of deported Jews from their homes. In that job her fascination for antiques grew as did her disgust for Nazis and their brutal treatment of Jews and other minorities. In 1942 when she was 14, Charlotte’s father forced her to become a member of Hitler’s youth. She openly hated the group, which caused more tension between her father, who was trying to make her behave more masculine.Using the war as an excuse, Charlotte, her mother, and her two siblings fled their abusive household to East Prussia and lived with their extended family. In East Prussia, Charlotte was able to explore her identity and sexual orientation with the support of her family. Charlotte and her family lived with her aunt, who is believed to either have been an out lesbian or trans man. Her aunt (or uncle) fully accepted her and gave her a copy of Dr. Magnus Hirschfled’s book Transvestites to read. Soon after leaving her father, Charlotte traveled back to Germany to help him arrange furniture to house Germans who lost their homes to bombings on their estate.During her visit Charlotte was violently attacked by her father and threatened with a gun. He gave her a choice; she would stay with him or he would commit a family murder-suicide. Fearing for her and her mother's lives, she struck her father several times over the head with a heavy rolling pin, killing him. She was taken into police custody and spent several weeks in a Nazi psychiatric institution before being sentenced to juvenile prison as an "anti-social delinquent". Luckily she was released early because the Third Reich collapsed two months after her conviction.Charlotte could not save the people that her father helped kill, but she felt that she could best help them by keeping their memory alive. Throughout her life she collected antiques from homes of those sent to concentration camps and bombed out houses before they could be destroyed by Nazis. Her collection eventually grew into the Grunderzeit Museum, which was inside her family’s estate. Throughout the 1960s, her museum became a poplar attraction in the local community. Throughout the 1970s, her museum also became a meeting place for queer and trans Germans seeking safety. She managed to save artifacts from East Berlin’s first gay bar before it was demolished, which were then put on display. Her activism caused a lot of grief for the government, who attempted but failed many times to seize the museum from her control.Charlotte in the Grunderzeit Museum, located on her family's estate.Charlotte lived openly as a trans woman for more than thirty years and was in a long term romantic relationship with Herbert von Zitzenau, a former officer in the Prussian army, until his death. In 1991 Charlotte and her friends were attacked by neo-Nazis in her museum. When police were nearby the offenders fled and were briefly chased by Charlotte who was armed with a hatchet.In 1992 Charlotte was honored with the Verdienstorden der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, or Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany for service to her country in the name of the President of the Republic.Charlotte showing her Order of Merit Knight Commander's Cross ribbon.Many looked past her trans identity to appreciate the work that she did to preserve the German arts during a time of distress and war.Charlotte was featured in the first gay German film and had a docudrama created based on her life called I Am My Own Woman in 1992. She wrote two autobiographies I Am My Own Woman: The True Story of Charlotte von Mahlsdorfhttp://www.amazon.com/Am-Own-Wife-Charlotte-Mahlsdorf/dp/1573442003/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1416605352&sr=8-1&keywords=charlotte+von+mahlsdorfand Beat it!, written in co-operation with Peter Süß. In 2003, her life was realized into a pulitzer prize winning play called I Am My Own Wife written by Dough Wright.http://www.amazon.com/Am-My-Own-Wife-Play/dp/0571211747/ref=pd_sim_b_1?ie=UTF8&refRID=17DSX6046CPSCD156D8VThe late Charlotte von Mahlsdorf and her cast mates on the set of I Am My Own Wife.Charlotte von Mahlsdorf died from heart failure during a visit to Berlin on 30 April 2002. Though she was known through her entire adult life as Charlotte, in death her family managed to misgender her and dishonor the memory of the life she lived. They pushed through the inscription "Lothar Berfelde, 1928 – 2002, genannt Charlotte von Mahlsdorf. Dem Museumsgründer zur Erinnerung" on her tombstone. Translated, it reads "Lothar Berfelde, 1928 – 2002, known as Charlotte von Mahlsdorf. In memory of the (male) founder of the museum".What We Learn From HistoryIt's important that we as trans people keep our histories alive, and none are more important than the stories of survival, bravery, and authenticity during that most horrific of eras in human history, the Holocaust. Our stories are part of who we are. They are the thread which weaves our identities into the larger narrative of the human struggle. Every person on the planet is faced with this same struggle. To survive, to learn, to grow, to love, to challenge, to overcome, to live, to be. We trans people are no different than anyone else in that respect. We aren't outsiders on the fringe of human experience, or outlying statistical anomalies. We're deeply interwoven in the very warp and weft of human existence. Our struggles are their struggles. Their struggles are our struggles. We are they, and they are us. We are one. Let none of us ever forget that, lest we lose our humanity again.Sourceshttp://andrejkoymasky.com/liv/fam/bioe1/elbe01.htmlhttp://historyofmentalhealth.com/2014/05/14/magnus-hirschfeld/http://historyofmentalhealth.com/2014/05/14/magnus-hirschfeld/http://transfeminism.tumblr.com/post/24887036847/transwomen-in-the-holocausthttp://trans.ilga.org/trans/welcome_to_the_ilga_trans_secretariat/trans_zone/personalities/charlotte_von_mahlsdorfhttp://www.infotrue.com/pagetwo.html#Trianglehttp://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005478http://womenineuropeanhistory.org/index.php?title=Charlotte_von_Mahlsdorfhttp://trans.ilga.org/trans/welcome_to_the_ilga_trans_secretariat/trans_zone/personalities/charlotte_von_mahlsdorf

This is a huge mistake in this serialShort answer (meme):Le Ravi Chopra after making this storyTranslation: what do these people will know.Long answer:First of all jaya and vijay were gatekeeper of Lord Vishnu.once sage sankadiks went to meet Lord Vishnu.when they reach vaikunth they were stopped by Jaya and Vijaya becuase at that time Lord Vishnu was resting.one more reason for stopping was sankadiks were fuĺl of knowledge but they looks like kids so Jay and Vijay tried to stop him from entering vaikunth.This made sankadiks angry and they cursed them for taking 3 births in Demon formReference:As the story goes, there were once four little boys, the Kumāras, who tried to gain entrance into Paradise, the spiritual world, known in the Indic tradition as Vaikuṇṭha.3Though they looked like five year olds, they were actually very old and spiritually very advanced—but not advanced enough. At the entrance to Paradise were two gatekeepers whose names were Jaya and Vijaya, and it was their job to allow or prevent, as the case may be, living beings who propose to enter.Now, these four little boys, though spiritually advanced, were impersonalists.4 According to Vaishnava tradition, an impersonalist is someone who thinks of God as not having form and is thus not ready to enter the spiritual world, where one has sweet interaction and relationship with God’s form. Because of this, when the four little boys tried to enter Paradise, the gatekeepers, Jaya and Vijaya, stopped them from doing so.As little boys often do, the Kumāras became angry for not getting their way, and they placed a curse on the two gatekeepers, forcing them to take birth in the material world.5Immediately fearing for their own well being, Jaya and Vijaya asked the four little boys for forgiveness, and it was at that moment when the Supreme Person Himself—Vishnu—appeared on the scene to intervene on their behalf.6 Placating the small boys, Vishnu convinced them to allow Jaya and Vijaya, as penance for their offense, to, yes, take birth in the material world, but, after some time, to return to Vaikuṇṭha, the spiritual realm. With that being said, the two gatekeepers lost their effulgence. Their countenances having fallen and becoming deeply saddened, they fell to the material world, taking birth as demonsThier 3 births1: Hiranyaksha and Hiranyakashipu.2: Ravan and Kumbhkaran3: shishupal and DantavaktraReference:We will now see Jaya and Vijaya take three births each throughout cosmic history—in each part of the world cycles, that is, in each of the initial three yugas—and then a very special birth in the fourth. Jaya becomes Hiranyaksha, Rāvaṇa, and Sishupala8 in Satya-, Treta-, and Dvāparā-yuga, respectively.9 The sequence for Vijaya similarly manifests as Hiraṇyakaśipu, Kumbhakarṇa, and Dantavakra.10 Though this might seem a little confusing, we will now see how it all plays out.Their first birth as demonHiranyakasyap and HiranyakshaHiranyaksha was so powerful that he tried to dig the earth to find gold and made earth unstable so it fell in the cosmic ocean.later Narayan took Varah avatar and killed hiranyaksha to rescue earthReference:Because of the elder brother Hiraṇyākṣa’s constant desire to mine for gold in the Earth, our planet gradually became unstable and detached from its position of floating in the universe. Thus, she eventually fell down into the cosmic ocean.15Meanwhile, Hiraṇyākṣa underwent tremendous austerities and thus received the blessings of Brahmā, the first created being, who allowed him to become undefeatable by man or beast. In due course, Hiraṇyākṣa took the Earth, already loosened by his mining activity, as already noted, and plunged her into the primordial depths of the cosmic ocean. All seemed lost.However, when procuring his boon from Brahmā, Hiraṇyākṣa had not mentioned the boar in his list of animals that would not be able to conquer him, and in light of this, Vishnu assumed just that form—Varāha Avatāra—with huge tusks and other assorted boar features. Diving down into the primordial ocean, he saved the earth as only a boar could, lifting it up with His transcendental tusks. But while in the ocean, He encountered Hiraṇyākṣa, who was ready for combat. They charged toward each other with rage. Finally, after a thousand cosmic years of battle, Hiraṇyākṣa was slain, ready for his next birth.Great penance of Hiranyakashipu.After death of his brother,Hiranyakashipu become very angry later he went on to penance for Lord Brahma and pleased him after very hard penance.Lord Brahma asked him for boon.Hiranyakashipu wanted to be immortal but Lord Brahma said this is inpossibel so Hiranyakashipu asked for a boon that he cant be killed by animal nor by human,not be die in daytime or nighttime,neither die in air nor at land,neither outside his palace nor inside.Lord brahma granted him boons and Hiranyakshipu thought he is now immortal.Reference:Although both Hiraṇyākṣa and Hiraṇyakaśipu received the blessing that they would never be killed by any living being in the universe,16 Hiraṇyakaśipu asked for additional boons from Lord Brahmā. Specifically, he wanted to become totally immortal, but Brahmā said that even hecould not overcome death and consequently could not grant such freedom to Hiraṇyakaśipu.Hiraṇyakaśipu then tried to circumvent this obstacle: He asked that he not be killed by any man, animal, god or, in fact, anyone in the material universe. He also asked that he not die on land, in the air, water, nor by any weapon.17Lastly, he asked that he not be killed in the daytime or nighttime.18 He thought that this would effectively make him unconquerable. Brahmā granted him these boonsHiranyakshipu declared himself as God and banned the worshipping of Lord Vishnu.Reference:Now, Hiraṇyakaśipu was angry with Vishnu for killing his brother Hiraṇyākṣa and it was in his anger that he asked Lord Brahmā for the above blessings, hoping to use his invulnerability to destroy the Earth’s saintly culture and to subjugate the entire universe—what to speak of destroy Vishnu Himself.19 More, he had legions of followers to assist him in his ugly plan, and they were only too glad to carry out his orders.Death of HiranyakashipuPrahlad,son of Hiranyakashipu was a great devotte of Narayan.Hiranyakashipu tried to kill him but Lord Vishnu saved him every time.later he tried to kill him herself Then Lord Vishnu took Narsimha(half lion half man)Incarnation and killled him becuase when Lord killed him:-:niehter it was day niether night it was eveningneither he was killed with shastra niehter with astra Lord killed him with His nailsNeither he was killed in his palace niether outside he was killed at gate of his palace.Neither he was killed at land niether in air Lord killed him at his Lamps.Nither he was killed by beast nither human he was killed by Lord Narsimha(man-lion).Reference:Now, Hiraṇyakaśipu was angry with Vishnu for killing his brother Hiraṇyākṣa and it was in his anger that he asked Lord Brahmā for the above blessings, hoping to use his invulnerability to destroy the Earth’s saintly culture and to subjugate the entire universe—what to speak of destroy Vishnu Himself.19 More, he had legions of followers to assist him in his ugly plan, and they were only too glad to carry out his ordersAnd yet, in spite of all his wealth and influence, all his endeavors to “overturn the established practices within [the] world,”20 to conquer the universe and planets of all human beings and bring them under his control, along with all his opulence and power,21 bodily strength, and enjoying all types of sense gratification as much as possible,22 ultimately he failed and was killed by the Supreme Person23—Nṛsiṁhadeva, the half-man/half-lion incarnation, battled with him and ripped him to shreds.To fulfill the benedictions given to him by Lord Brahmā, Hiraṇyakaśipu was killed after he had been placed on Nṛsiṁha’s lap and therefore not by any created being; during dusk and therefore not during day nor night; not inside or out but on the terrace, and on the lap of the Lord; wasn’t killed by any “person” but by an incarnation of God; and not by any manmade weapon,24 but by the claws of Nṛsiṁha, the Supreme Person Himself.2nd birth of Jaya & Vijaya as Ravan and Kumbh karan.Jaya and Vijaya took 2nd birth in demon form as Ravan and Kunbhakarn.Ravan was the ruler of Lanka but he conquered all three lokas.later he kidnapped Devi Sita and took him to lanka on his pushpak viman.Then Raghuvar (7th incarnation of lord Vishnu)along with laxman(incantation of adi shesh)and with the help of Sugriva the rule of kishkindha and his vanar sena defeated and killed Ravan along with his son Atikay,indrajit, ahiravan and Kunbhakarn.Reference:Rāvaṇa and Kumbhakarṇa, the second incarnations of Jaya and Vijaya, were rākṣasas—demons who ate humans—and were brothers born into the family of Viśravā and Keśinī. Rāvaṇa means “one who causes trouble for others and makes others cry,”25 and it is said that he was a ten-headed monster—literally. Kumbhakarṇa, the younger brother of Rāvaṇa, means “pot-eared,” and he was called this specifically because of the shape of his ears. Kumbhakarṇa, we are told, slept a lot and upon waking had a big appetite—for people.26The story of the two rākṣasa brothers is predominantly found in the Rāmāyaṇa—an ancient Indian epic of approximately 24,000 Sanskrit verses—and in the 9th Canto, Chapter 10 of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, among other places. In any case, the point is this: Rāvaṇa wasn’t able to control himself; he was a demon of the worst order, setting any kind and altruistic ideas aside in favor of self-aggrandizement and complete selfishness. He apparently had lusty desires for Rāma’s wife Sītā, too, who he kidnapped by subterfuge and took to Lanka.27 Kumbhakarṇa was similarly uncontrolled. He is briefly mentioned in SB 9.10.18, and in the 7th, 4th, and 9th Cantos, but it is usually only in passing.There’s more information about Kumbhakarṇa in the Rāmāyaṇa, but even that seems negligible. Another source has Kumbhakarṇa telling Rāvaṇa that the way he abducted Sītā wasn’t proper (Narayan [1972] 2006, p. 125). That same source tells how it was difficult to arouse Kumbhakarṇa from his deep sleep28 and that if you were the one unfortunate enough to be given the task of awakening him, you would likely end up becoming his breakfast.Rāvaṇa and Kumbhakarṇa were later killed by Lord Rāma, the incarnation of Vishnu in the Tretā age. First Kumbhakarṇa was killed, but not before he killed thousands of the monkey warriors of Hanumān’s brother’s army.29 As for Rāvaṇa, he was killed in Lanka30 when Rāma shot an arrow into his heart.31 The fatal blow had to be in his heart because he had been given a benediction that if any of his ten heads were destroyed, another would take its place.32 Interestingly, Rāvaṇa’s original nature came through after he was killed by Rāma.Third and last incarnation which was shown incorrect in Vishnu Puran:-Dantavakra and SHISHIPAAAAALLLLL.When shishupal was born he was said to have three eyes and four hands and the time of his birth. He was also the cousin of Krishna and ruler of chedi kingdom.At the time of Rajsuya yagya of yudhishthir asked bhishm pitamah whom to be worshipped first then pitamah along with all person present their said krishna should be worshipped first on this shishupal opposed and started abusing Lord Krishna later Lord krishna beheaded him with his sudarshan chakra.Reference:For their third (and ostensibly last) incarnation, Jaya and Vijaya took birth in a kṣatriya family as the cousins of Yudhiṣṭhira.34 Oddly, Śiśupāla is said to have had three eyes and four arms when he was born.35 He was the son of Damaghoṣa (Prabhupada 1972–2010, p. 356), later became the King of Chedi, a kingdom in ancient India, and was an enemy of Krishna. Śiśupāla’s cousin, Dantavakra (they weren’t brothers in this birth) was so named because of his crooked teeth36 and he was the king of Karūṣa.37Both Śiśupāla and Dantavakra were killed by Krishna,38 with the first being Śiśupāla. It happened that King Yudhiṣṭhira decided to have a big consecration ceremony and invited all the demigods and qualified Brahmins to attend.39 He also invited other family members who were less than qualified. One of them was Śiśupāla, who was also one of Krishna’s cousins. He was angry with Krishna for many reasons, but one of them was that he, Śiśupāla, was supposed to marry Princess Rukmiṇī and the very day of her wedding, Krishna kidnapped her as per her desire and she married Him instead.40Back to Yudhiṣṭhira’s ceremony: The most important people of the clan were invited to speak, and when it came to Śiśupāla’s turn, he remained seated which in itself was disrespectful, and, then, what’s worse, he began to berate Krishna. Śiśupāla didn’t just give his opinion about things—he suggested that Krishna wasn’t fit to be honored the way the others were honoring Him. He kept going on and on and became more and more offensive as he continued.41 Some of those present actually covered their ears or left the assembly. Others were so offended by Śiśupāla’s words that they threatened to kill him. It was then that Krishna, seeing that the ceremony was about to be disrupted, threw his Sudarśana chakra at Śiśupāla, cutting his head off—giving him liberation.42Dantvakra:He become angry after his cousin's death and challenged Shri krsna for a fight and then…………………you all know what is going to be happenReference:After Śiśupāla’s death, Dantavakra became extremely angry and in his anger challenged Krishna to battle, bringing only his anger and a single club to the fray. Krishna, following the rules of military etiquette, armed Himself in a commensurate way, using only a club. As is usual for a demon, Dantavakra hurled meaningless insults at Krishna. Then they fought.At first he tried to placate the Lord by reminding Him that they were cousins, but then he started to boast again, saying he would tear Krishna into pieces. Just then, he hit Krishna in the head with his club, and not feeling any pain or discomfort, Krishna retaliated by hitting Dantavakra in the chest, splitting his heart wide open.43 Those present at the confrontation say they saw a small spiritual spark go from Dantavakra’s body into Krishna’s.I just found these refences I don't know from where mr. Chora found the reference thag kans was a rebirth of Jaya instead of kalenmi(previous. Birth of kamsa)