Outline For Sea Protocol. Outline Format: Fill & Download for Free

No.Boris Johnson agreed with the EU: no new frontier controls or border checks across the island of Ireland. Instead, Mr Johnson and his ministers will implement new checks and controls on trade within the UK with the Northern Ireland protocol.The EU goes into negotiations on the UK’s future relationship with Mr Johnson who lacks support from UK business, faces growing disquiet among some of his Conservative parliamentary colleagues concerning his adviser Dominic Cummings and is failing to engage with voters on the trade offs ahead. All of which is being noted by EU national leaders and EU officials.Any efforts by Mr Johnson to divide and rule EU member states will fail. Because the EU member states can respond with a wish list of their own objectives which can go into the European Commission’s negotiating mandate: Gibraltar, Elgin Marbles or fishing rights (for example).Mr Johnson’s latest reported plans involve reneging on parts of the withdrawal agreement - thus avoiding checks in the Irish Sea and implementing the Northern Ireland protocol. This approach will not create trust in forthcoming talks with the European Commission. The Commission and EU member states will respond to Mr Johnson untrustworthy antics accordingly.Elsewhere, there are worrying signs of UK government disarray, discord and dithering. A draft outline proposal of the UK-EU trade deal has been ditched. And the government have pushed back to March 2020 a negotiating UK-US trade mandate.Mr Johnson is unavailable for comment.

Apologizing would be tantamount to apologizing to your mugger.It surprises me how often this question is asked. As a result I have a stock answer I post when answering so I don't have to start every answer from scratch. Some of this answer may not fit perfectly within the context of this particular permutation of the question but a complete reading will answer the question, I have borrowed extensively from Andrew Warner: How is the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki different from what Hitler did to the Jews? Why did the Germans take moral responsibility for what happened with the Jews but the Americans did not?I find the assumptions behind the question, naive, insensitive, and insulting. We spent our treasure, sacrificed over 100,000 of our citizens’ lives, another quarter of a million were maimed, and countless families back home were disrupted putting this outlaw nation, a brutal, savage, barbaric monster known as Japan back in its cage along with its fanatical, sadistic army. This aberration was responsible for more than fifteen million innocent civilian deaths on a scale equaled only by Nazi Germany. Japan aggressively invaded its peaceful neighbors without declarations of war murdering and raping along the way and we are criticized for finally dropping two atomic bombs on it in an effort to bring this unjust and unnecessary war to an end, a war we neither started nor wanted?The bombs were dropped for only one reason, to save American lives.How many lives were saved is an unknown dependent entirely upon when the Japanese surrendered. While Truman wouldn't have been concerned about saving Japanese lives estimates run as high as 4,000,000 saved. The Japanese estimate is 10,000,000 of their citizens would be killed in an invasion. Estimates of Allied lives saved run as high as 1,000,000. How the Atomic Bomb Saved 4,000,000 Lives - Hiroshima Saved Lives - Why Drop an Atomic Bomb? To Save Lives!Strategic bombing was not a war crime under the Hague Conventions in force at the time. Mass killing of civilian populations under military occupation was a defined war crime.All the combatants of World War II considered banning strategic bombing in December 1922 and February 1923 in an update of the Hague Conventions but no state approved of the proposed measures. The Geneva Disarmament Conference of 1932 entertained proposals for banning bombing by aircraft but no measure was approved.While we may consider wholesale bombing of civilian centers a war crime (and it is, thanks to Protocol I of the Geneva Convention adopted in 1977), there was no international consensus to ban strategic bombing before or during World War II.On the other hand, there was ample international law covering the treatment of occupied countries during war and the treatment of prisoners of war. Germany was a signatory to those international conventions and egregiously violated many of their provisions.The Japanese were planning to begin a biological warfare campaign against San Diego on September 22d. It was cancelled at the last minute in order to preserve warships to defend the homeland from the expected invasion. Operation Cherry Blossoms at NightThis was not a case of "victor's justice" or Allied hypocrisy.An important point of fact: international military tribunals for conducting strategic bombing campaigns during World War II prosecuted neither German nor Japanese defendants.Distinguishing between atomic bombing and conventional strategic bombing is morally problematic.The single biggest loss of life from aerial bombing was not Hiroshima, not Nagasaki; it was a single firebombing raid on Tokyo, Operation Meetinghouse. At least 100,000 and possibly up to 300,000 were killed, more than either the Hiroshima or Nagasaki bombing individually, maybe more than them combined. It seems dubious to me to distinguish between what does the killing, ionizing radiation vs. high explosive vs. incendiaries. Is one morally permissible and another not? Is it a question of scale of killing?Nagasaki and Hiroshima were bombed for tactical reasons.The Japanese farmed out their war production to cottage factories scattered throughout cities so that the only way to damage production was to carpet bomb these cities.A city is bombed for tactical purposes: communications are to be destroyed, railroads wrecked, ammunition plants demolished, factories razed, all for the purposes of impeding the military. In those operations, it inevitably happens that non-military persons are killed. This is an incident, a grave incident to be sure, but an unavoidable corollary of battle action. The civilians are not individualized. The bomb falls, it is aimed at the railroad yards and houses along the tracks are hit and many of their occupants killed. But that is entirely different, both in fact and in law, from an armed force marching up to those same railway tracks, entering those houses abutting thereon, dragging out the men, women, and children and shooting them.It was argued in behalf of the defendants that there was no moral distinction between shooting civilians with rifles and killing them by means of atomic bombs. There is no doubt that the invention of the atomic bomb has added a preoccupation and worry to the human race, but the atomic bomb, when used, was not aimed at non-combatants. Like any other aerial bomb employed during the war, it was dropped to overcome military resistance.Thus, as grave a military action as is an air bombardment, whether with the conventional bombs or by atomic bomb, the one and only purpose of the bombing is to effect the surrender of the bombed nation. The people of that nation, through their representatives, may surrender and, with the surrender, the bombing ceases, the killing is ended. Furthermore, a city is assured of not being bombed by the law-abiding belligerent if it is declared an open city.We warned and urged the citizens of each Japanese city, including Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to evacuate before each bombingIn addition, in keeping with our policy of warning Japanese civilians of a possible bombing and urging them to evacuate, we dropped leaflets over Nagasaki of a possible atomic bombing. Japanese soldiers would punish civilians who read these warning leaflets.Leaflets dropped on cities in Japan warning civilians about the atomic bomb, dropped c. August 6, 1945:TO THE JAPANESE PEOPLE:America asks that you take immediate heed of what we say on this leaflet.We are in possession of the most destructive explosive ever devised by man. A single one of our newly developed atomic bombs is actually the equivalent in explosive power to what 2000 of our giant B-29s can carry on a single mission. This awful fact is one for you to ponder and we solemnly assure you it is grimly accurate.We have just begun to use this weapon against your homeland. If you still have any doubt, make inquiry as to what happened to Hiroshima when just one atomic bomb fell on that city.Before using this bomb to destroy every resource of the military by which they are prolonging this useless war, we ask that you now petition the Emperor to end the war. Our president has outlined for you the thirteen consequences of an honorable surrender. We urge that you accept these consequences and begin the work of building a new, better and peace-loving Japan.You should take steps now to cease military resistance. Otherwise, we shall resolutely employ this bomb and all our other superior weapons to promptly and forcefully end the war.EVACUATE YOUR CITIES.ATTENTION JAPANESE PEOPLE. EVACUATE YOUR CITIES.Because your military leaders have rejected the thirteen part surrender declaration, two momentous events have occurred in the last few days.The Soviet Union, because of this rejection on the part of the military has notified your Ambassador Sato that it has declared war on your nation. Thus, all powerful countries of the world are now at war with you.Also, because of your leaders' refusal to accept the surrender declaration that would enable Japan to honorably end this useless war, we have employed our atomic bomb.A single one of our newly developed atomic bombs is actually the equivalent in explosive power to what 2000 of our giant B-29s could have carried on a single mission. Radio Tokyo has told you that with the first use of this weapon of total destruction, Hiroshima was virtually destroyed.Before we use this bomb again and again to destroy every resource of the military by which they are prolonging this useless war, petition the emperor now to end the war. Our president has outlined for you the thirteen consequences of an honorable surrender. We urge that you accept these consequences and begin the work of building a new, better, and peace-loving Japan.Act at once or we shall resolutely employ this bomb and all our other superior weapons to promptly and forcefully end the war.EVACUATE YOUR CITIES.Source: Harry S. Truman Library, Miscellaneous historical document file, no. 258.Curtis LeMayThe LeMay Bombing LeafletThe Information War in the Pacific, 1945WW2 US Warning Leaflet / LeMay Bombing LeafletCurtis LeMay and bombing strategyAmazon.com: unbroken: BooksHague Conventions of 1899 and 1907Airborne leaflet propagandaUse the Atomic Bomb Pages 500, 502, 504, 505, 508, 509, and 510 are especially enlightening about discussions among high level people about why the decision was made. Little consideration appears to have been given to the political aspect, ending the war was the consuming consideration.The firebombings, of which the atomic bomb was a continuation of this strategy, had enormous strategic value. As I mentioned above The Japanese farmed out their war production to cottage factories scattered throughout cities so that the only way to damage production was to carpet bomb these cities. Lemay began bombing for total destruction because war production was unaffected by conventional bombings. He either deduced or was told that was because production was primarily done in residences and these could not be seen from the air. A POW witness described large machines standing above the wreckage after a bombing. War production fell off markedly after he adopted the new strategy. Amazon.com: Unbroken: A World War II Story of Survival, Resilience, and Redemption (9780812974492): Laura Hillenbrand: BooksThe reason Hiroshima was chosen was because it was an important army depot and a port of embarkation but there were other reasons: Hiroshima was chosen as the primary target since it had remained largely untouched by bombing raids, and the bomb's effects could be clearly measured. While President Truman had hoped for a purely military target, some advisers believed that bombing an urban area might break the fighting will of the Japanese people. Hiroshima was a major port and a military headquarters, and therefore a strategic target. Also, visual bombing, rather than radar, would be used so that photographs of the damage could be taken. Since Hiroshima had not been seriously harmed by bombing raids, these photographs could present a fairly clear picture of the bomb's damage. The Story of Hiroshima This may sound cold blooded but then military decisions are often cold blooded.Nagasaki also had industry. The bomb detonated over the industrial center. The city of Nagasaki had been one of the largest sea ports in southern Japan and was of great war-time importance because of its many and varied industries, including the production of ordnance, ships, military equipment, and other war materials. The narrow long strip attacked was of particular importance because of its industries. The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Here is a composite of Bondi Beach in Sidney Australia and the transitions from 1914 to 2014.No sea level rise is evident now or will be noticeable in the next 100 years.Huffing Post’s Jenavieve Hatch recently conflated storm surge with sea level rise in North Carolina. This is pure “yellow” journalism and if Huffington were a printed paper fit only for lining bird cages. Beaches worldwide have suffered from erosion and development but not from sea level rise resulting from thermal oceanic expansion which is responsible for the rise.NOAA provides an interactive map for people to play with absurd seal level rise scenarios. As far as legitimate maps for some planned response to rising oceans due to “global warming expectations”, they are stacked neatly next to maps outlining evacuation protocols for the next zombie apocalypse.