Stars - Organization Structure Maintenance Form - Office Of The: Fill & Download for Free

As noted by others, life as a Marine officer varies greatly based on your MOS, your duty station, your Boss(es), your subordinate Marines (both good and bad), in the garrison (office) or in the field or deployed, your grade, and probably most importantly, your personal sense of honor, courage, and commitment.Marine officers are taught from day one that we are exceptional because we WILL live up to the highest standards, or literally die trying.Our entry level training includes lots of “customs and courtesies.” These include simple things common to all services like saluting, putting on your trousers one leg at time, shaving, knowing when to say “sir” and “ma’am,” and rank structure so you know where you fit into the hierarchy.And then, the Marine Corps takes it to another level: memorizing names of famous Marines from the last 240 years of Marine Corps history, and what they did and said and how they led their Marines. Every word of 3 stanzas of the Marine Corps Hymn. The names and general outcomes of a dozen battles in our history that defined what the Marine Corps was and is today. Perfection in uniform wearing and maintenance that would make an English butler cry for joy. How to spot Marines from across the street or room who have…something…anything wrong with their uniform, their ribbons, how they wear their cover on their head, the top and bottom articles of their uniform are slightly shaded different due to different ages or wear patterns, their dress shoes have a scuff, their belt buckle a scratch, and on and on! Why Marine officers wear the “Quatrefoil” on the top of their dress and service barracks covers. Why officers and noncommissioned officers wear a red “blood stripe” on their dress blue trousers. Why Marine officers have a “Mameluke” sword. Why Marine noncommissioned officers today use a sword patterned after the 1850 US Army officer saber. Why our uniform emblem, the “Eagle, Globe, and Anchor,” shows the Western Hemisphere, and what each of the 3 parts symbolizes. Why our trousers have 7 belt loops. Why it is completely unacceptable to be seen in public with an “Irish Pennant” (piece of thread) out of place on our uniform. Why we can’t kiss someone, or hold hands, while in uniform. Why we (and our family members) can’t go into an on-base establishment wearing bathing suits, yoga pants, or anything derogatory or demeaning. Why America has a Marine Corps. And on and on!Similar to Heather Allen below, I was also an Adjutant, and I read her description and instantly recognized that she was shooting x-rings!While my MOS has changed somewhat over the years, moving away from personnel-heavy, technical skills in human resource management toward manpower planning, she nailed the essence of the Adjutant’s job, at least during the first few years of service.For most of my 24 years or so as an Adjutant, I worked between 10–12 hour days, at least 5 days a week. Sometimes more or less. There truly is no end to the work that a dedicated officer has, or will find, to do. I also rarely went to the field with my units, because there was simply no need to perform human resources management with large paper files and massive computer bandwidth and connectivity required to get the job done. And, like Heather Allen, I was often NOT expendable enough to “go have fun.” Instead, I was Cinderfella: while they went to the Ball, I slaved away.As I became more senior, I was deliberately chosen for “remain behind” duties, because my Bosses knew what I could do, and that I was “the perfect man for the job” of keeping the unit humming, coordinating the various staff sections, acting as a central point of reference for communications with other units, higher headquarters, subordinate units, family members, and outside agencies like the Red Cross or local police departments. While I didn’t ask for those duties, I saw the need, trained myself on what needed to be done, and then performed them without complaint to the best of my abilities.As an officer, I initially served as the Adjutant for a Light Armored Reconnaissance Battalion. Thus, I had to learn not only my job, but the basics of LAR tactics and vehicle maintenance, command, etc. In this unit, I deployed to Los Angeles during the May 1992 Rodney King riots. That was interesting…one of the few times Federal troops were authorized to perform law enforcement-related duties because the Insurrection Act was invoked by the President, Federalizing the California National Guard units and suspending Posse Comitatus restrictions against Federal military performing law enforcement. The only time in my military career I was authorized to arrest a civilian for breaking a law.I later served as an infantry Regimental Adjutant, an Air Station Adjutant, a Civil Affairs Group Adjutant, an Inspector-Instructor for a reserve Supply Battalion, the Director of a Personnel Admin Center (PAC) that handled nearly 100,000 service records, a staff officer at Headquarters, Marine Corps, involved with reserve integration and mobilization laws and policies, a deployment for a year to Afghanistan to work directly for a Canadian General officer, and the highest Adjutant job there is: the G-1 Officer (senior administrator on the staff of a general officer) for a Marine Division and a Marine Logistics Group.But, when I deployed, like all Marine officers, I was expected to be knowledgeable, confident, and skilled in a vast amount of tasks far beyond what I was responsible for in the garrison. I was expected to know how to handle various weapon systems, how to use sophisticated radios for communications, the basic concepts of convoy operations and local security, and if necessary foot patrols. All Marine officers learn in The Basic School about the basic tactics of the offense, the defense, calling artillery or airstrikes, and even if their eventual MOS is a lawyer, a pilot, an administrative officer, a supply officer, etc., they have all been through the same entry level officer training. This training is not enough to qualify as an infantry officer, which requires a very intense follow-on course specifically to become an 0302, Infantry Officer. But The Basic School provides enough of everything that any graduate should be capable of doing what needs to be done, whether by personal example and knowledge, or coordinating the effective actions of a group of others…i.e., “leadership.”ALL Marine officers are considered to be “of the line.” This means that regardless of MOS or grade, from the most junior Warrant Officer to the Commandant, each officer is legally eligible, using the sovereign authority delegated to them from the US Constitution under Article II, to succeed to command a unit of Marines…or take command when they are the senior Marine left. And they are expected to know what to do when they are in command. All commissioned US military officers are “Officers of the United States,” and continue in that status until they resign their commission and are completely severed from military status, or they die. (Because even after retirement, officers remain “Officers of the United States,” they just don’t have any duties to perform in their Office. And they remain eligible to be recalled to active duty for an emergency until they die…that’s why they continue to draw retirement pay…it’s just a reduced salary for reduced readiness…)EDIT: I noted above “all US military officers are “Officers of the United States,…” However, strictly speaking, this isn’t true. The answer is very convoluted, but suffice it for purposes of this answer that all “commissioned” officers are Officers of the United States, as that is mostly a term of art, in erudite legal opinions, etc. What is left out is the status of “noncommissioned officers,” i.e., those servicemembers who are appointed to an “office” of trust and responsibility, and are thus “officers,” but who are not commissioned. Included:Warrant Officer-1’s - upon appointment to Chief Warrant Officer-2, a Warrant Officer is commissioned. But a WO-1 is appointed by a “warrant,” which is similar to albeit without the full legal authority of a commission. For the most part, a WO-1 is extended all the normal courtesies of commissioned officers, e.g., salutes, “sir/ma’am,” officer’s club, officer’s ID card, etc. All WO-1’s take the Oath of Office, just like commissioned officers, upon appointment.Cadets and Midshipmen - of both Federal Service Academies and Senior ROTC programs, they are appointed to their “office” by either the President (service academies) or their Service Secretary (for SROTC), take the Oath of Office, and are generally not extended the full range of courtesies of commissioned officers, e.g., they are entitled to eat in the officer’s mess/clubs, and for certain other legal requirements are treated the same as commissioned officers, but they are usually not saluted nor placed in positions of direct authority over enlisted members.“Traditional” noncommissioned officers/petty officers - those enlisted members appointed to positions of authority and trust by their Service (i.e., their “office” in Constitutional terms…), take the Oath of Enlistment rather than the Oath of Office, are clearly marked within the military and legal hierarchy as “enlisted,” and “noncommissioned/petty officer,” but do wield considerable authority by virtue of the delegated Constitutional authority inherent in their appointments as “officers,” which includes the “power of apprehension” for any NCO/PO, warrant, or commissioned officer for any violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The Services entrust this authority with appointment to:E-4 (Cpl in the USMC, Petty Officer Third Class for the Navy and USCG),E-4 (to CPL in the Army, but not Specialist (SPC)-4),E-5 (to Staff Sergeant in the Air Force).AND A RETURN TO THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED ANSWER…At a certain point of seniority, of course your contact with junior Marines begins to diminish and you spend more time with your peers and your bosses, working in staff jobs that challenge your sanity (i.e., your commitment).Up to 50% of all Marine officers in any given year group who are commissioned end up retiring from active duty. And an additional number end up retiring from the Reserves, as well. This is a really important distinction: perhaps 50% of all Marine officers are willing to “go the distance” and stay for at least 20 years. And, like me, many of those who are beyond 20 years only retired when they are forced to, “kicking and screaming” all the way to the door.Some officers will do their minimum service obligation (usually between 3.5 and 6 years), and leave the service. They have served honorably, done what was required of them, and have chosen to take a different path in life.But I guarantee that for every one of them, there is a nagging voice inside that guides them in many ways to push themselves, put others before self, wait at the end of the chow line for everyone else to eat before they do (even at family reunions, etc.).Here is where the essence of “leadership” begins to crystallize: Marine officers hold themselves to higher standards than anyone else. They DO get exhausted with constant stresses of not letting their Bosses and Marines down…and not showing anyone, even their peers, weakness. Because weakness will get you killed in combat, or worse yet, your Marines killed because YOU failed them.Marine officers are expected to know more than the basics of anything their Marines are doing. They may not know every technical detail, but enough to get by.If you have watched the movie, “Battlefield Los Angeles,” at the beginning when the “old Staff Sergeant” is running on the beach but being passed by all the younger Marines, this is a good example of where all Marine leaders WANT to be at least as good, if not better, at anything they ask their Marines to do. This is personal leadership by example. The Staff Sergeant in that movie was telling himself that because he could no longer provide the example, it was time to “move on” to retirement.As a 46 year old with almost 28 years of service, I was still running over 100 miles per month, and doing my best to stay in shape to beat the 18 year olds right out of boot camp. This was not because I was ordered to do so; I was compelled to do so by my sense of personal honor and commitment. (And, a side note, I often beat out the younger Marines who for whatever reason had not kept themselves in shape to beat a salty old officer…)I also, like Heather Allen, spent a lot of time doing drill and ceremonies. I am very proud of the fact that my officer’s Mameluke sword shows wear and tear, from the salt in my sweat over many years of (always of course on the hottest and most humid days) parade practice, rubbing off the anodized finish, and even —- only once! —- dropping it and nicking it. (EDIT: curiously enough, I had rested my Mameluke against the stone wall next to the main entrance to the Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni headquarters building, during a break from parade practice one day. To my horror, it started to slide down the wall, and fell with a loud clatter. To my ears, it was EXACTLY the same sound as a Marine in boot camp dropping their rifle! Loud, harsh, and most unwelcome… But here is the thing: that building was where legend had it much of the planning by Japanese Admiral Yamamoto was done for the Pearl Harbor attack in December 1941…maybe the building was just getting an extra slice of revenge…)Most officers don’t much use their swords again after TBS for anything except their wedding or their friend’s weddings, and those swords almost remain in the same pristine condition as upon purchase. But some few, special, Marines get to not only master the Sword Manual of Arms, but organize and perform drill and ceremonies for special functions, changes of command, and USE their swords when forming up Battalions, Regiments, or even Divisions on the ground with thousands of Marines in formations…all responding to your commands as the Adjutant of the parade. “Adjutant’s Call.” “Sound Off!” “Sir, the parade is formed.” “Report!” “Officers, Center!” “Sir, all present and accounted for!”Forming a parade is a martial tradition that goes back 1,000 years, and many of the movements and commands given on the parade deck haven’t really changed much in hundreds of years.And the Adjutant, whether a real Adjutant by MOS, or someone appointed to do the job, is the officer who by tradition gives those commands, and it is an awesome spectacle to see thousands of Marines move at your commands, or as a staff officer (the Adjutant or G1) give orders to unit Commanders, Colonels or LtCols who then take movements and give orders of their own on the parade deck…A long answer to your short question. Being a Marine is a challenge. The Marine Corps, frankly, doesn’t want you UNTIL you have decided to give everything to it. Officers are expected to give until there is nothing left, and then find more ways to keep giving. Even when the situation, or the institution, are against you and your Marines, you are expected to keep faith with each other, always do your best, follow the Commander’s Intent, and “do or die.”But the sense of belonging, of making your mark in an organization that is the epitome of excellence, and being surrounded by esprit de corps IS the right career choice for many officers.Once a Marine, Always a Marine.Notes on famous Marines that all Marines today know about, and use as their reference points for honor, courage, and commitment:Possibly the most famous Marine of all time (although…The Gunny below undoubtedly beats him today in public recognition), but the Gunny will readily tell you that his story is nothing compared to Lieutenant General Chesty Puller (only Marine to ever receive 5 Navy Crosses, plus one of the Army’s equivalent Distinguished Service Cross):2. Sergeant Major Dan Daly, one of the most famous Marines, one of only two Marines (along with retired Major General Smedley Butler) to be awarded TWO Medals of Honor:3. Gunnery Sergeant John Basilone, awarded the Medal of Honor for heroism during the Battle of Guadalcanal early in World War II. He was allowed, but refused, to stay in the US (out of harm’s way), and went back to war with his Marines. He was killed in action on the first day of Iwo Jima, for which he was awarded the Navy Cross. He was the only enlisted Marine to receive both the Medal of Honor and the Navy Cross in World War II:4. First Sergeant Bradley Kasal was awarded the Navy Cross for his actions in the moments before this picture was taken during operations in Fallujah in 2004. He was wounded 7 times by rifle fire, and absorbed 43 pieces of shrapnel when he shielded a wounded Marine from a grenade explosion:5. GySgt R. Lee Ermey (aka “The Gunny” in many movies, medically retired from injuries as a SSgt, given a VERY rare honor when Commandant made him an Honorary Gunnery Sergeant, to match his persona and the impact he made in contemporary pop culture since he starred in Full Metal Jacket in 1986).EDIT: Notice his Drill Instructor Ribbon (innermost ribbon, his right breast as shown in the picture), and his 2 “hashmarks” indicating 8 years of enlisted service on his lower left forearm (he actually had a few more years, but not enough for another hashmark)…fewer than one might expect from even a SSgt, let alone a GySgt. He was promoted fairly early to SSgt, but his career was cut short by medical retirement.EDIT #2: I note with sadness that today, 15 April 2018, Gunnery Sergeant R. Lee Ermey, USMC (Retired), died of complications from pneumonia and reported to his final duty station by passing through the Pearly Gates…and he probably looked St. Peter over for uniform discrepancies on his way in…(RIP: R. Lee Ermey, April 2018. R. Lee Ermey)

1. Promises BrokenWhen the Constitution Act of India was declared in 1950, it declared Sikhism to be “a sect of Hinduism” and offered no safeguards to the Sikh community. Both Sikh members of the Constituent Assembly refused to sign the document. They declared vehemently that: “The Sikhs do not accept this Constitution. The Sikhs reject this Constitution Act.”Before Independence congress leaders used to promise "Let God be the witness of the bond that binds me and the Congress to you. Our Sikhs friends have no reason to fear that it would betray them. For, the moment it does so, the Congress would not only thereby seal its own doom but that of the country too. Moreover, the Sikhs are brave people. They know how to safeguard their rights, by the exercise of arms, with perfect justification before God and man, if it should ever come to that" (Young India 19 March 1931)"No Constitution would be acceptable to the Congress which did not satisfy the Sikhs." (Collected works of M K Gandhi Vol.58. p. 192) "The brave Sikhs of Panjab are entitled to special consideration. I see nothing wrong in an area and a set up in the North wherein the Sikhs can also experience the glow of freedom. (Jawaharlal Nehru, Congress meeting: Calcutta - July, 1944) "In subsequent years, all the personal laws of the Sikhs were abolished and replaced by Hindu statutes, such as the “Hindu Marriage Act 1955,” the “Hindu Succession Act 1956,” etc.When in 1954 Jawaharlal Nehru was reminded of the solemn promises made to Sikhs and other minorities by the Hindu-dominated Congress party, he replied, “The circumstances have now changed.”Even in 2005 judgement Supreme court bench accepted that in 1949 Indian constitution did not regard Sikhs as a separate religion. So Indian constitution denies the Sikh identity itselfhttp://www.judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=270982. Linguistic states and Punjabi subaIn December 1953, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru appointed the States Reorganisation Commission to prepare for the creation of states on linguistic lines , Maharashtra based on Marathi ,Gujarat based on Guajarati but no state of Punjabi was to be formed /reorganised based on the Punjabi as its language .This led to widespread discontentment among the Sikhs and Punjabis .During this time J L Nehru asked Hukam Singh speaker of Lok Sabha if he supports the concept of linguistic states .To this he replied that he does not support the concept of linguistic states but if you go for creating linguistic states based on other languages then I will support the creation of a state based on Punjabi .While other linguistic states were formed in 1956 But Punjabis succeeded in getting Punjab state which is at times referred to as Lagda or lame Punjab as the one –third Punjab left after partition of 1947 was further trifurcated into Haryana , Himachal and present day Punjab on 1 novemeber 1966 .The main reason for this was threatening present day Hindus living in Haryana that they will not be treated equally in Punjabi speaking Punjab .So when plebiscite for creation of new state was conducted most of the Punjabi speaking Hindus of present day Haryana and Himachal wrote their mother tongue as Hindi and not Punjabi . After this ill-conceived campaign of threatening Punjabi Hindus which was spearheaded by Hind Samachar group of Jalandhar many Punjabi speaking districts like Ganganagar , Ambala , Karnal were kept out of Punjab and Chandigarh which was constructed on land taken from Punjabi farmers was declared as joint capital /UT.The Akal Takht played a vital role in organizing Sikhs to campaign for the Punjabi suba. During the course of the campaign, twelve thousand Sikhs were arrested for their peaceful demonstrations in 1955 and twenty-six thousand in 1960-61.Again on September 1, 1965 when Pakistani forces crossed the international border at Chhamb Jaurian in Jammu and Kashmir ,the akali leaders immediately declared their unconditional support to the government .Once again Sikh soldiers crossed swords with the Pakistanis and Sikh peasantry rallied to the support of their fighting forces carrying food and help to the battle front .In 22 days war, the most distinguished record of bravery was set by Sikh officer Lt General Harbakhsh Singh who had the sole credit of halting the Pakistani tanks.At one time during 1965 war there was panic at Army Headquarters that Pakistan might break through Indian defences. Harbakhsh Singh’s finest moment came when the Army Chief, General Choudhary, ordered him "to abandon Amritsar and set-up a defence line behind the river Beas." Rightly, General Harbakhsh Singh refused to follow such an order, and the threat to Amritsar never developed.This makes one thing clear Sikhs were not against unity and sovereignty of India but against the denial of their just demands.3. River waters disputePunjab has the exclusive right to Punjab river waters on the basis of riparian law. The other states to which these waters have been distributed are non-riparian, having no valid claim to it. The riparian law is based upon justice and equity, having international acceptance. It has been approved by United Nations. In India it has been followed in all other states and Punjab has been made the only exceptionThe 1976 distribution of Punjab river waters, was award of Prime minister Indira Gandhi vide which Rajasthan was allocated 8.6 maf, Haryana 3.5 maf, Delhi 0.2 maf and Punjab 3.5 maf out of 15.8 maf which was declared as surplus, though there was no surplus water and this entire water was much less than the needs of Punjab .The central government—against the provisions of the Indian constitution introduced sections 78 to 80 in the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966, under which the central government “assumed the powers of control, maintenance, distribution and development of the waters and the hydel power of the Punjab rivers. It must be remembered here that as per Indian constitution river water distribution falls under the state list . Many Sikhs perceived this division as unfair and as an anti-Sikh measure, since the vast majority of the people of Punjab are dependent on agriculture.4. Akali Dal's demandsThe Akali Dal led a series of peaceful mass demonstrations to present its grievances to the central government. The demands of the Akali Dal were based on the Anandpur Sahib Resolution, which was adopted by the party in October 1973 to raise specific political, economic and social issues. The major motivation behind the resolution was the safeguarding of the Sikh identity by securing a state structure that was decentralised, with non-interference from the central government. The Resolution outlines seven objectives.1. The transfer of the federally administered city of Chandigarh to Punjab .2. The transfer of Punjabi speaking and contiguous areas to Punjab .3. Decentralisation of states under the existing constitution, limiting the central government’s role.4. The call for land reforms and industrialisation of Punjab , along with safeguarding the rights of the weaker sections of the population.5. The enactment of an all-India gurdwara (Sikh house of worship) act.6. Protection for minorities residing outside Punjab , but within India.7. Revision of government’s recruitment quota restricting the number of Sikhs in armed forces.The Wall Street Journal noted:"The Akali Dal is in the hands of moderate and sensible leadership...but giving anyone a fair share of power is unthinkable politics of Mrs. Gandhi [the then Prime Minister of India]...Many Hindus in Punjab privately concede that there isn't much wrong with these demands. But every time the ball goes to the Congress court, it is kicked out one way or another because Mrs. Gandhi considers it a good electoral calculation.5. Emergency and role of Sikhs :Shortly after the declaration of the Emergency, the Sikh leadership convened meetings in Amritsar where they resolved to oppose the "fascist tendency of the Congress". The first mass protest in the country, known as the "Campaign to Save Democracy" was organized by the Akali Dal and launched in Amritsar, 9 July. A statement to the press recalled the historic Sikh struggle for freedom under the Mughals, then under the British, and voiced concern that what had been fought for and achieved was being lost. The police were out in force for the demonstration and arrested all those who raised the Sikh call of "Jo Bole So Nihaal, Sat Sri Akal" (Whoever speaks, shall be fulfilled, Truth is Undying), including the Shiromani Akali Dal and Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee (SGPC) leaders.The Prime Minister seemed genuinely surprised at the strength of the response from the Sikhs. Fearing their defiance might inspire civil disobedience in other parts of the county, she offered to negotiate a deal with the Shiromani Akal Dal that would give it joint control of the Punjab Legislative Assembly. The leader of the protests, Sant Harcharan Singh Longowal refused to meet with government representatives so long as the Emergency was in effect. In a press interview, he made clear the grounds of the Save Democracy campaign."The question before us is not whether Indira Gandhi should continue to be prime minister or not. The point is whether democracy in this country is to survive or not. The democratic structure stands on three pillars, namely a strong opposition, independent judiciary and free press. Emergency has destroyed all these essentials."While the civil disobedience campaign caught on in some parts of the country, especially at Delhi University, the government's tactics of mass arrests, censorship and intimidation curtailed the opposition’s popularity. After January, the Sikhs remained virtually alone in their active resistance to the regime. Hailed by opposition leaders as "the last bastion of democracy",they continued to come out in large numbers each month on the day of the new moon, symbolizing the dark night of Indian democracy, to court arrest.When attempts at pacifying the Akalis failed, Prime Minister Gandhi took the opportunity of the dictatorship to deal the Sikhs of her country two stunning blows.One was an award of Punjab waters which gave 75% of the river flow to neighboring non-riparian states, at great cost to the farmers of Punjab and in violation of international law on such rights. The second blow was a ruling from the Defence Ministry that future enrollment in the armed forces of Sikhs should be proportional to their percentage of the population of India. Whereas Sikhs had traditionally constituted 11% of the country's armed forces from a population of only 2%, this was another assault on the Sikhs of India.The prime minister's days of dictatorship came to an unexpected end when she called elections for March 1977. With their voices returned to them, the people of India trounced Indira Gandhi at the polls. According to Amnesty International, 140,000 people had been detained without trial during the twenty months of Mrs. Gandhi's emergency. Of them, 40,000 were Sikhs. Indira Gandhi would never forget. When she returned to power in 1980, she would come down hard on the Sikhs.According to Amnesty International, 140,000 people had been arrested without trial during the twenty months of Indira Gandhi's Emergency. Of them, 40,000 had come from India's two percent Sikh minority.6. Nirankari Kaand :Till now we saw partition and betrayal of promises made during independence, struggle to get Punjabi suba , emergency atrocities and sustained opposition to emergency by Sikhs . As a result of opposition to the biased government policies a strong feeling of antipathy developed between central government on one side and Sikhs and Punjab on the other side .So the central government through its various agencies tried to modulate the social opinions .For this purpose it set up and encouraged various anti Sikh sects (schools of thoughts ) this included Nakli nirankaris (sometimes referred to as just nirankaris but they are different from asli or the real nirankaris) and Radha saomi . apart from financing these two pre existing sects in their anti –Sikh activites .Central government agencies also encouraged the penetration of new saints and holymen .This encouragement of sects who openly preached against Sikh ism and /or tried to to wane away Sikhs from Guru Granth sahib gave the Sikhs an impression that government is against Sikhs .In the coming days this proved disastrous , as these sects and their heads starting taking liberty with law .It should be noted that although Gurbachan Singh's movement call themselves Nirankaris, they do not have anything in common with the original Nirankari movement that made enormous sacrifices and significant contributions for Gur Panth’s reform.With increasing encouragement from government in 1978 nirankari sect head gurbachan Singh decided to imitate Guru Gobind Singh ji .The Nirankari leader is on record as saying that Guru Gobind Singh had made only Panj Pyare (Five Beloved) and that he would make ‘Saat Sitaare’ (seven stars). He had even dared to place his foot upon Guru Granth Sahib Ji.On 13 th April 1978 Nirankaris took out a procession in Amritsar and held a big congregation ,In this procession anti Sikh slogans were shouted and in the congregation inflammatory remarks were made to protest this A group of unarmed Sikhs went to the site of the congregation .But Nirankari saint in collusion with police had armed people who attacked these unarmed Sikhs leading to death of 13 Sikhs and many more injured .The astonishing thing is that the gathering of the Nirankaris continued for three-and-a-half hours after this bloody massacre had occurred. It has also become known that the D.C of Gurdaspur, Naranjan Singh I.A.S, and other senior officers were present in the gathering during the massacre. It is clear that the authorities of the Amritsar district allowed the Nirankaris to hold their procession in the Sikhs main city of Amritsar during Vaisakhi. The Police authorities are guilty of colluding with and allowing the Nirankaris complete freedom to kill at will, and not dealing with them properly at the right time. The Nirankaris were the creation of the ‘democratic’ Government of India.The sect was created to divide the Sikhs and produce infighting within the Panth.The Indian Express (Chandigarh Edition) featured a report by Sat Pal Baghi in late April 1978. He felt that the Indira Gandhi actively supported the Nirankaris saying: “The genesis of the real trouble between the Nirankaris and the Akalis goes back to the years when Indira Gandhi headed the Union Government. She wanted to weaken the Shiromani Akali Dal, but found that the Akalis could not be brought to heel. She thought of an elaborate plan to strengthen the Nirankari sect not only in Punjab , but throughout the country and abroad also. Official patronage was extended to the Nirankaris much to the anger of the Akalis/Sikhs who have always considered the Nirankaris as heretics.7. Kanpur massacre :Agitation was started against the Nirankaris. Wherever they held their meetings, Sikhs would go and strongly protest. Thus Gurbachan Singh was unable to address the meetings held at Varanasi,Azamgarh and Allahbad. On 25th September 1978, Gurbachan Singh reached Kanpur at 9.30pm flanked by police officers ordered to provide protection. The news soon leaked out and Sikhs started a protest march from Gurdwara Gobindpuri Sahib Ji, which is three kilometres away from the Nirankari Bhawan in Kanpur. Women and children were also amongst the protesters. The Nirankari chief had again made full preparations for the Sikhs. When the Sikh protesters reached the Nirankari Bhawan, the Nirankaris attacked them with brickbats and shotguns.An armed volunteer of the Nirankaris attacked Jathedar Kishan Singh with a spear, piercing his stomach.A fight ensued, and it was then that the police officers started to shoot at the Sikh protesters. As a result, thirteen Sikhs were martyred while a further seventy-four were injured.Rise and role of Jarnail Singh BhindrawalaBhindraale can at best be described as a religious preacher who played an important role in1) Awakening the Sikh youth about the ill effects of drugs and bringing them back to religious fold2) Opposing the unjust policies of central government targeted towards Punjab .He learned principles of Sikh ism at Damdami Taksal of Bhinder Kalan village and eventually went on to become its head. There he used to tour villages to spread the teachings of ten Sikh gurus and to organise Amrit Sanchar (the Sikh baptism ceremony ) He was very strict with people who used to shun the Sikh discipline after taking baptism.He vehemently denounced drugs, alcoholic drinks and trimming of hair. He took special notice of the Nirankari heresy which was undermining the Sikh Structure. Opposition to the Nirankaris had started during the time of his predecessor, Sant Kartar Singh Khalsa. Matters came to a head on the Baisakhi day of 1978 when Nirankaris held a convention at Amritsar. The Damdami Taksal under Sant Jarnal Singh Bhindrenwale and the Akhand Kirtani Jatha, (another purely religious organization), protested against government allowing the Nirankaris to hold their convention at a time the Sikhs were celebrating the birth anniverssary of the Khalsa. Some of them who marched to the site of the convention were fired upon by Nirankari guardsmen killing 13 of them on the spot and wounding 78 others. The episode brought Sant Bhindrenwale into the political arena.To understand bhindrawale phenomenon one has to understand two extremely important facts.The first is the position of the use of force for a righteous cause in Sikh ideology and that nothing was unusual or abnormal in the context of Sikh ism and its history . Second, a continuous attempt by government to communalise the atmosphere so as to lead to incidents of violence .In one of the interviews Bhindrawale said “You asked me about Khalistan. I neither support it, nor am I against it .We want to stay with Hindustan , it is for central governent to decide whether they want us with them or not .Yes if they give us khalistan we will take it . We wont make the mistake of 1947.We are not asking for it but we’ll take it if they give it to us .”Apart from the Nirankari incident mentioned in previous paragraph the other purely regional incidents were given the guise of religious demand by central government and denied this led to strong resentment not only in bhindrawale but also in Sikh and Punjabi youth .There was let loose a reign of terror and exploitation of Sikhs in Punjab and verbal war was fought by press against Sikhs with Lala Jagat Narain the owner of hind samachar leading the fight against Sikhs .He used to publish inflammatory articles instigating Hindus against Sikhs .Lala Jagat Narain had appeared as witness in case of Nirankaris and had ensured release of culprits .Meanwhile., the Shiromai Akali Dal had been conducting a morcha since April 1982 against the digging of Satluj-Yamuna Link (S.Y.L.) canal which would divert part of Punjab 's river waters to Haryana. The agitation inspite of immense support from the Sikh peasantry was not bearing any tangible fruit because the site (Kapori village on the Haryana-Punjab border where the Indian Prime minister had inaugurated the digging of the canal on 6 April 1982 was in a remote corner away from the Dal's headquarters. The Dal now decided to transfer the agitation, now designated Dharam Yuddh or religious war, to Amritsar from 4 August 1982. Sant Jarnail Singh merged his own morcha with it, and thus became in a way the joint dictator of the entire Panth though he still swore loyalty to the former dictator of the Akali morcha, Sant Harchand Singh Longowal.A further provocation to the Sikhs came from the behaviour of the Haryana government and police during the Asian Games held at Delhi in November 1982. Sikhs travelling from Punjab to Delhi or back were indiscriminately stopped, searched and humiliated. Violence in the Punjab was on the increase. It was becoming more and more clear that the government would seek a military Solution of the situation in Punjab rather than a political one. Sant Bhindranwale exhorted the people to be prepared for a showdown. On 15 December 1983, he with his men entered the Akal Takht and With the help of a former major general of the IndianArmy, Shahbeg Singh, prepared a network of defensive fortifications inside the complex collecting in the meanwhile a large stock of arms, ammunition and rations anticipating the possibility of a prolonged siege. The government on its part made elaborate plans for all army action while pretending all along its readiness for negotiations and denying any intention of sending armed forces inside the Darbar Sahib complex. The Punjab was placed Under the President's rule on 6 October 1983. A ordinance declaring parts of the state a disturbed area was promulgated, and the police was given power to search, arrest or even shoot whom they will with immunity from legal action. Six additional divisions of the army including especially trained para commandos were inducted into Punjab by the end of May 1984. On 1 June, while the Sikhs had started preparations in the Golden Temple for the observation of the martyrdom anniversary of Guru Arjan, the fifth Sikh guru ,which fell on the 3rd of June, strict curfew was clamped on Amritsar and surrounding districts. The actual assault of the army's operation nicknamed Blue Star took place on the night of 5-6 June 1984. A pitched battle ensued in which the army also used tanks and artillery. On the 7 Of June the dead body of Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale was located in the basement of the Akal Takht.Operation Blue starReal Aim : A human rights activist Ram Narayan Kumar notes, “Operation Blue Star was not only envisioned and rehearsed in advance, meticulously and in total secrecy, it also aimed at obtaining the maximum number of Sikh victims, largely devout pilgrims unconnected with the political agitation.”Stated aim : "checking and controlling extermist, terrorist and communal vioulence in Punjab , providing security to the people and restore normalcy." Advertised targets: Jarnail Singh Bhindrawale living in akal Takhat and his disciples numbering 100-150 Actual target/victims: Sangat /visitors gathered to celebrate the martyrdom day of fifth Sikh guru , Guru Arjan Dev ji numbering more than 10,000 in number Forces employed: All three wings of the defence : army , navy and airforce were employed in this operation .

OP ( User-10565474478538009258 ) is genuine profile interested in knowing hence I decided to answer the question.If you are interested in understanding the issue in detail I would suggest readingthe scribd article at link : Reasons for Khalistan demand which is more detailed.I have summarized same below.1. Promises BrokenWhen the Constitution Act of India was declared in 1950, it declared Sikhism to be “a sect of Hinduism” and offered no safeguards to the Sikh community. Both Sikh members of the Constituent Assembly refused to sign the document. They declared vehemently that: “The Sikhs do not accept this Constitution. The Sikhs reject this Constitution Act.”Before Independence congress leaders used to promise "Let God be the witness of the bond that binds me and the Congress to you. Our Sikhs friends have no reason to fear that it would betray them. For, the moment it does so, the Congress would not only thereby seal its own doom but that of the country too. Moreover, the Sikhs are brave people. They know how to safeguard their rights, by the exercise of arms, with perfect justification before God and man, if it should ever come to that" (Young India 19 March 1931)"No Constitution would be acceptable to the Congress which did not satisfy the Sikhs." (Collected works of M K Gandhi Vol.58. p. 192) "The brave Sikhs of Panjab are entitled to special consideration. I see nothing wrong in an area and a set up in the North wherein the Sikhs can also experience the glow of freedom. (Jawaharlal Nehru, Congress meeting: Calcutta - July, 1944) "In subsequent years, all the personal laws of the Sikhs were abolished and replaced by Hindu statutes, such as the “Hindu Marriage Act 1955,” the “Hindu Succession Act 1956,” etc.When in 1954 Jawaharlal Nehru was reminded of the solemn promises made to Sikhs and other minorities by the Hindu-dominated Congress party, he replied, “The circumstances have now changed.”Even in 2005 judgement Supreme court bench accepted that in 1949 Indian constitution did not regard Sikhs as a separate religion. So Indian constitution denies the Sikh identity itselfhttp://www.judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=270982. Linguistic states and Punjabi subaIn December 1953, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru appointed the States Reorganisation Commission to prepare for the creation of states on linguistic lines , Maharashtra based on Marathi ,Gujarat based on Guajarati but no state of Punjabi was to be formed /reorganised based on the Punjabi as its language .This led to widespread discontentment among the Sikhs and Punjabis .During this time J L Nehru asked Hukam Singh speaker of Lok Sabha if he supports the concept of linguistic states .To this he replied that he does not support the concept of linguistic states but if you go for creating linguistic states based on other languages then I will support the creation of a state based on Punjabi .While other linguistic states were formed in 1956 But Punjabis succeeded in getting Punjab state which is at times referred to as Lagda or lame Punjab as the one –third Punjab left after partition of 1947 was further trifurcated into Haryana , Himachal and present day Punjab on 1 novemeber 1966 .The main reason for this was threatening present day Hindus living in Haryana that they will not be treated equally in Punjabi speaking Punjab .So when plebiscite for creation of new state was conducted most of the Punjabi speaking Hindus of present day Haryana and Himachal wrote their mother tongue as Hindi and not Punjabi . After this ill-conceived campaign of threatening Punjabi Hindus which was spearheaded by Hind Samachar group of Jalandhar many Punjabi speaking districts like Ganganagar , Ambala , Karnal were kept out of Punjab and Chandigarh which was constructed on land taken from Punjabi farmers was declared as joint capital /UT.The Akal Takht played a vital role in organizing Sikhs to campaign for the Punjabi suba. During the course of the campaign, twelve thousand Sikhs were arrested for their peaceful demonstrations in 1955 and twenty-six thousand in 1960-61.Again on September 1, 1965 when Pakistani forces crossed the international border at Chhamb Jaurian in Jammu and Kashmir ,the akali leaders immediately declared their unconditional support to the government .Once again Sikh soldiers crossed swords with the Pakistanis and Sikh peasantry rallied to the support of their fighting forces carrying food and help to the battle front .In 22 days war, the most distinguished record of bravery was set by Sikh officer Lt General Harbakhsh Singh who had the sole credit of halting the Pakistani tanks.At one time during 1965 war there was panic at Army Headquarters that Pakistan might break through Indian defences. Harbakhsh Singh’s finest moment came when the Army Chief, General Choudhary, ordered him "to abandon Amritsar and set-up a defence line behind the river Beas." Rightly, General Harbakhsh Singh refused to follow such an order, and the threat to Amritsar never developed.This makes one thing clear Sikhs were not against unity and sovereignty of India but against the denial of their just demands.3. River waters disputePunjab has the exclusive right to Punjab river waters on the basis of riparian law. The other states to which these waters have been distributed are non-riparian, having no valid claim to it. The riparian law is based upon justice and equity, having international acceptance. It has been approved by United Nations. In India it has been followed in all other states and Punjab has been made the only exceptionThe 1976 distribution of Punjab river waters, was award of Prime minister Indira Gandhi vide which Rajasthan was allocated 8.6 maf, Haryana 3.5 maf, Delhi 0.2 maf and Punjab 3.5 maf out of 15.8 maf which was declared as surplus, though there was no surplus water and this entire water was much less than the needs of Punjab .The central government—against the provisions of the Indian constitution introduced sections 78 to 80 in the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966, under which the central government “assumed the powers of control, maintenance, distribution and development of the waters and the hydel power of the Punjab rivers. It must be remembered here that as per Indian constitution river water distribution falls under the state list . Many Sikhs perceived this division as unfair and as an anti-Sikh measure, since the vast majority of the people of Punjab are dependent on agriculture.4. Akali Dal's demandsThe Akali Dal led a series of peaceful mass demonstrations to present its grievances to the central government. The demands of the Akali Dal were based on the Anandpur Sahib Resolution, which was adopted by the party in October 1973 to raise specific political, economic and social issues. The major motivation behind the resolution was the safeguarding of the Sikh identity by securing a state structure that was decentralised, with non-interference from the central government. The Resolution outlines seven objectives.1. The transfer of the federally administered city of Chandigarh to Punjab .2. The transfer of Punjabi speaking and contiguous areas to Punjab .3. Decentralisation of states under the existing constitution, limiting the central government’s role.4. The call for land reforms and industrialisation of Punjab , along with safeguarding the rights of the weaker sections of the population.5. The enactment of an all-India gurdwara (Sikh house of worship) act.6. Protection for minorities residing outside Punjab , but within India.7. Revision of government’s recruitment quota restricting the number of Sikhs in armed forces.The Wall Street Journal noted:"The Akali Dal is in the hands of moderate and sensible leadership...but giving anyone a fair share of power is unthinkable politics of Mrs. Gandhi [the then Prime Minister of India]...Many Hindus in Punjab privately concede that there isn't much wrong with these demands. But every time the ball goes to the Congress court, it is kicked out one way or another because Mrs. Gandhi considers it a good electoral calculation.5. Emergency and role of Sikhs :Shortly after the declaration of the Emergency, the Sikh leadership convened meetings in Amritsar where they resolved to oppose the "fascist tendency of the Congress". The first mass protest in the country, known as the "Campaign to Save Democracy" was organized by the Akali Dal and launched in Amritsar, 9 July. A statement to the press recalled the historic Sikh struggle for freedom under the Mughals, then under the British, and voiced concern that what had been fought for and achieved was being lost. The police were out in force for the demonstration and arrested all those who raised the Sikh call of "Jo Bole So Nihaal, Sat Sri Akal" (Whoever speaks, shall be fulfilled, Truth is Undying), including the Shiromani Akali Dal and Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee (SGPC) leaders.The Prime Minister seemed genuinely surprised at the strength of the response from the Sikhs. Fearing their defiance might inspire civil disobedience in other parts of the county, she offered to negotiate a deal with the Shiromani Akal Dal that would give it joint control of the Punjab Legislative Assembly. The leader of the protests, Sant Harcharan Singh Longowal refused to meet with government representatives so long as the Emergency was in effect. In a press interview, he made clear the grounds of the Save Democracy campaign."The question before us is not whether Indira Gandhi should continue to be prime minister or not. The point is whether democracy in this country is to survive or not. The democratic structure stands on three pillars, namely a strong opposition, independent judiciary and free press. Emergency has destroyed all these essentials."While the civil disobedience campaign caught on in some parts of the country, especially at Delhi University, the government's tactics of mass arrests, censorship and intimidation curtailed the opposition’s popularity. After January, the Sikhs remained virtually alone in their active resistance to the regime. Hailed by opposition leaders as "the last bastion of democracy",they continued to come out in large numbers each month on the day of the new moon, symbolizing the dark night of Indian democracy, to court arrest.When attempts at pacifying the Akalis failed, Prime Minister Gandhi took the opportunity of the dictatorship to deal the Sikhs of her country two stunning blows.One was an award of Punjab waters which gave 75% of the river flow to neighboring non-riparian states, at great cost to the farmers of Punjab and in violation of international law on such rights. The second blow was a ruling from the Defence Ministry that future enrollment in the armed forces of Sikhs should be proportional to their percentage of the population of India. Whereas Sikhs had traditionally constituted 11% of the country's armed forces from a population of only 2%, this was another assault on the Sikhs of India.The prime minister's days of dictatorship came to an unexpected end when she called elections for March 1977. With their voices returned to them, the people of India trounced Indira Gandhi at the polls. According to Amnesty International, 140,000 people had been detained without trial during the twenty months of Mrs. Gandhi's emergency. Of them, 40,000 were Sikhs. Indira Gandhi would never forget. When she returned to power in 1980, she would come down hard on the Sikhs.According to Amnesty International, 140,000 people had been arrested without trial during the twenty months of Indira Gandhi's Emergency. Of them, 40,000 had come from India's two percent Sikh minority.6. Nirankari Kaand :Till now we saw partition and betrayal of promises made during independence, struggle to get Punjabi suba , emergency atrocities and sustained opposition to emergency by Sikhs . As a result of opposition to the biased government policies a strong feeling of antipathy developed between central government on one side and Sikhs and Punjab on the other side .So the central government through its various agencies tried to modulate the social opinions .For this purpose it set up and encouraged various anti Sikh sects (schools of thoughts ) this included Nakli nirankaris (sometimes referred to as just nirankaris but they are different from asli or the real nirankaris) and Radha saomi . apart from financing these two pre existing sects in their anti –Sikh activites .Central government agencies also encouraged the penetration of new saints and holymen .This encouragement of sects who openly preached against Sikh ism and /or tried to to wane away Sikhs from Guru Granth sahib gave the Sikhs an impression that government is against Sikhs .In the coming days this proved disastrous , as these sects and their heads starting taking liberty with law .It should be noted that although Gurbachan Singh's movement call themselves Nirankaris, they do not have anything in common with the original Nirankari movement that made enormous sacrifices and significant contributions for Gur Panth’s reform.With increasing encouragement from government in 1978 nirankari sect head gurbachan Singh decided to imitate Guru Gobind Singh ji .The Nirankari leader is on record as saying that Guru Gobind Singh had made only Panj Pyare (Five Beloved) and that he would make ‘Saat Sitaare’ (seven stars). He had even dared to place his foot upon Guru Granth Sahib Ji.On 13 th April 1978 Nirankaris took out a procession in Amritsar and held a big congregation ,In this procession anti Sikh slogans were shouted and in the congregation inflammatory remarks were made to protest this A group of unarmed Sikhs went to the site of the congregation .But Nirankari saint in collusion with police had armed people who attacked these unarmed Sikhs leading to death of 13 Sikhs and many more injured .The astonishing thing is that the gathering of the Nirankaris continued for three-and-a-half hours after this bloody massacre had occurred. It has also become known that the D.C of Gurdaspur, Naranjan Singh I.A.S, and other senior officers were present in the gathering during the massacre. It is clear that the authorities of the Amritsar district allowed the Nirankaris to hold their procession in the Sikhs main city of Amritsar during Vaisakhi. The Police authorities are guilty of colluding with and allowing the Nirankaris complete freedom to kill at will, and not dealing with them properly at the right time. The Nirankaris were the creation of the ‘democratic’ Government of India.The sect was created to divide the Sikhs and produce infighting within the Panth.The Indian Express (Chandigarh Edition) featured a report by Sat Pal Baghi in late April 1978. He felt that the Indira Gandhi actively supported the Nirankaris saying: “The genesis of the real trouble between the Nirankaris and the Akalis goes back to the years when Indira Gandhi headed the Union Government. She wanted to weaken the Shiromani Akali Dal, but found that the Akalis could not be brought to heel. She thought of an elaborate plan to strengthen the Nirankari sect not only in Punjab , but throughout the country and abroad also. Official patronage was extended to the Nirankaris much to the anger of the Akalis/Sikhs who have always considered the Nirankaris as heretics.7. Kanpur massacre :Agitation was started against the Nirankaris. Wherever they held their meetings, Sikhs would go and strongly protest. Thus Gurbachan Singh was unable to address the meetings held at Varanasi,Azamgarh and Allahbad. On 25th September 1978, Gurbachan Singh reached Kanpur at 9.30pm flanked by police officers ordered to provide protection. The news soon leaked out and Sikhs started a protest march from Gurdwara Gobindpuri Sahib Ji, which is three kilometres away from the Nirankari Bhawan in Kanpur. Women and children were also amongst the protesters. The Nirankari chief had again made full preparations for the Sikhs. When the Sikh protesters reached the Nirankari Bhawan, the Nirankaris attacked them with brickbats and shotguns.An armed volunteer of the Nirankaris attacked Jathedar Kishan Singh with a spear, piercing his stomach.A fight ensued, and it was then that the police officers started to shoot at the Sikh protesters. As a result, thirteen Sikhs were martyred while a further seventy-four were injured.8. Rise and role of Jarnail Singh BhindrawalaBhindraale can at best be described as a religious preacher who played an important role in1) Awakening the Sikh youth about the ill effects of drugs and bringing them back to religious fold2) Opposing the unjust policies of central government targeted towards Punjab .9. Attack on Harmandir Sahib in 1984 : All the above reasons culminated into Indira Gandhi attacking Harmandir sahib in Amritsar as she needed to make Sikhs as scapegoat , to show them anti-national and hence win elections due in 1985.Here again it was advertised to nation that their are terrorists in Golden Temple. But very cleverly a day of religious significance was choosen to start the attack to ensure maximum no. of visiting sikh followers can be killed. also 40 other gurudwaras across the Punjab were also attacked.Also to be noted is that General SK Sinha who was to be promoted to head Indian Army refused to attack Darbaar Sahib and hence was denied promotion .His deputy was promoted who went on to attack Darbaar Sahib.More details on same in the scribd article shared in beginning.10. Anti Sikh genocide through out India in Nov 1984 and culprits not getting punished : Harpreet Singh's answer to Why did the riots of 1984 happen? What is the history which finally led to riots?For record 10000 plus Sikh lives were lost 100s of sikh women were raped and till now Indian judiciary has not been able to provide any justice.11. Reign of encounters in Punjab from 1984 to 1995 : In which any Sikh youth in the age group of 15 to 55 was caught and killed by police and CRPF to complete their quota of encounters and to get promotion.12. RSS which is bent upon proving Sikhs to be part of hinduism : compared to congress RSS adopts more scholarly approach to attack Sikhism . They focus on adulterating Sikh history and proving Sikh gurus were Hindus. They do research and write books to propagate their thinking . So in schools run by RSS you will find that children are taught about Sikh gurus , Sikh martyrs but it is stressed they were “PROTECTORS OF HINDU RASHTRA” they are reduced to the level of Maha Rana Pratap and Shivaji who were hindu heroes without any spiritual part. RSS will write books to prove Guru Nanak Dev ji is avtaar of Vishnu.All these led to a feeling of distrust towards Indian establishment among Sikhs.All these led to demand for Khalistan.