Media Release Form: Fill & Download for Free

This answer may contain sensitive images. Click on an image to unblur it.Who is the most successful serial killer that has never been caught?Define success?Successfully historically notorious?Jack the RipperJack the Ripper - WikipediaSuccessfully highest documented kill count while evading capture?Dean Arnold Corll, part of a serial killer duo responsible for the Houston Mass Murders he had at least 28 known victims before he was killed by his partner, he was never caught while he was alive.Dean Corll - WikipediaThere are many other serial kills with much higher kill counts (some in the 300+ range) who are no longer in prison, some are still active. But they have been caught at one time or another, in particular in Brazil where you can be caught and convicted but it’s not possible to sentence a person to more than 30 years. Men like Pedro Filho have over 100 kills but were released after serving their time. Some of them achieved their kill counts while in prison, making other prisoners their targets.All of these men have been caught but have very high kill counts, some while in prison, most were released and continued to kill:Luis Garavito - WikipediaPedro López (serial killer) - WikipediaDaniel Camargo Barbosa - WikipediaPedro Rodrigues Filho - WikipediaYou can find a much longer list of serial killers and their body counts here, the only others on the list which were not caught have a lower body count than Dean Corll:List of serial killers by number of victims - WikipediaSome of the more notorious are the Zodiac Killer:Zodiac Killer - WikipediaNever caught, but with only 5 proven victims, there are at least 37 other “possible” victims he might have been connected to, but they could have just as easily been copycat victims.Successfully notorious for their media names?Here’s a list of 14 famous media names of serial killers that were never caught, their kill counts are not all massive:14 Serial Killers Who Were Never Captured, In Order Of How Frightening Their Media-Created Names Are14. The Babysitter13. The Moonlight Murderer12. Jack the Stripper11. Bible John10. The Rainbow Maniac9. The Grim Sleeper8. The Zodiac Killer7. Beer Man6. The Doodler5. Jack the Ripper4. Axeman of New Orleans3. The Mad Butcher of Kingsbury Run2. Servant Girl Annihilator1. Charlie Chop-OffMost successful Hollywood (fictional) serial killer?Dexter Morgan (aka The Bay Harbor Butcher)Dexter (TV Series 2006–2013)Successfully evading capture and currently still known to be active in modern times?9 Current Serial Killers Still At LargeThe Long Island KillerJeff Davis 8 KillersDaytona Beach KillerThe B1 ButcherThe Maryvale ShooterThe West Mesa Bone CollectorBrazil’s Rainbow ManiacThe Johannesburg KillerHighway Serial Killings (multiple suspects)10 Terrifying American Serial Killers Still At Large - ListverseJeff Davis 8 (overlaps with previous list)The Oakland County Child KillerThe Bear Brook MurdererThe Colonial Parkway KillerThe Route 8 KillerThe Hartford KillerIndian Creek Trail KillerI-65 KillerThe Scherer MurdersChillicothe KillerThe largest part of the problem with this question is, what defines success? Historical notoriety? Media fame? Body count? Some other metric of measurement?I would put forth that the most successful serial killer that was never caught, is the one you’ve never even heard of. The one no law enforcement official has even put on their radar. That one serial killer that is so dam good at what they do that every murder they have committed has gone unconnected or undetected. Their list of victims might be on the missing persons list, but no ones figured out that the crimes are even murders or that they have anything to do with each other.Over 600,000 people a year go missing in the USA alone. Over 250,000 people a year go missing in Great Britain. That’s nearly a million people a year from just those two places in the world.Worldwide more than 80,000 people a day go missing, over 29 million people per year. And those are just the ones that get reported. How many are not reported?The most successful serial killer in my opinion probably has a body count of several thousand and you won’t even know who he is or that his victims are even connected. He’s just that dam skilled.Here’s a counter psychology question for you:What if we defined the success of a serial killer by his ability to over come his own urges?What if we could know that a person truly wanted to kill, had the desire and ability to kill, but was able to psychologically and logically talk themselves out of committing the actual acts?Is that success? Or is that failure?Do normal humans go around plotting the murder of every person they meet and then talk themselves out of doing it?I mean, if everyone does it, then it’s normal. But if it’s unique to that person, and they still have to over come that desire every day, with every person they meet; is that a form of success?It just makes you wonder, how many people exist that have a desire to kill but successfully manage to overcome that urge, and is that not a form of success?Of course, you would only have their word for it.That’s the long winded way of saying the answer to your question is probably Jack the Ripper, for the simple fact that as a measure of success his legacy is the most pervasive and widely known, despite him not having the highest body count or not facing off against modern police techniques to elude capture.

What convinced me that voter fraud was not only real, but happened without question, were the statistical anomalies. I have an educational background in statistics, and what I learned early on is that numbers and statistical data and analysis never lie.Trust the Science: There is Undeniable statistical evidence that voter fraud occurred. Read on.As the American media continues to claim that no evidence for widespread voter fraud exists, many independent forensic data analysts, who have analyzed data scrapes from Edison Research found quite the opposite.Since November 4th, there have been dozens of statistical analyses completed by data scientists, showing statistical impossibilities in hundreds of counties across the country.One thorough scientific analysis published calls into question the legitimacy of Biden victories in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia.This analysis was a through review of 8,954 vote updates and highlighted four decisive updates, which were the most anomalous updates in the entire data set. The experts found that each of the vote updates do not follow the generally observed pattern, and the anomalous behavior of those updates is particularly extreme.Another scientific analysis by data scientists revealed How Pennsylvania Democrats Used Fake Voter Registration “Birthdays” to Commit Voter Fraud.The analysts constructed a new metric of potential voter fraud using suspicious distributions of birthdays in Pennsylvania voter registration data. Under this metric, a number of counties in Pennsylvania have extremely unlikely distributions of voter birthdays. Seven counties representing almost 1.4 million votes total (Northumberland, Delaware, Montgomery, Lawrence, Dauphin, LeHigh, and Luzerne) have suspicious birthdays above the 99.5th percentile of plausible distributions, even when using conservative assumptions about what these distributions should look like.Another statistical analyst recently revealed a scenario of how Democrats pulled off massive fraud in Montgomery county, Pennsylvania with ballot harvesting on a massive scale.Another scientific analysis looked at the shift in voting patterns that occurred between the 2016 and 2020 elections to identify suspicious counties. The two with the largest shifts were Oakland and Wayne in Michigan.Experts analyzed the election data from the two Michigan counties, and concluded that there are major statistical aberrations that are extremely unlikely to occur naturally. Using more conventional statistical analyses, they identified nine total different counties in Michigan alone with abnormal results.Their expert recommendation was that those Michigan counties should have an audited recount for every ballot and signature.According to another analysis by William M Briggs, PhD, approximately 154,000 votes have gone missing across several states. In Pennsylvania alone, there were around 30,000 Republican ballots not accounted for.According to yet another expert analysis by Dr. Kershavarz-Nia who has a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D in various areas of computer engineering, Dominion memory cards with cryptographic key access to the systems were stolen in 2019.Kershavarz-Nia has also trained with the CIA, NSA, and DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis. He is arguably the best and most experienced cyber security expert in the world. His technical expertise was touted by the New York Times and he has been described as a hero in the Washington Monthly. The findings in his nine-page affidavit is summed up as follows:“I conclude with high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred to Vice President Biden. These alterations were the result of systemic and widespread exploitable vulnerabilities in DVS, Scytl/SOE Software and Smartmatic systems that enabled operators to achieve the desired results. In my view, the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible.”With many of the swing states ending in razor thin margins, many republicans have called for an audit to determine exactly how many non-citizens voted in the election. In an election where the difference in results is within 1% in key states, this is a legitimate concern considering their turnout has been confirmed to swing elections in the past.One scientific study from 2014 concluded that participation in US election by non-citizens has been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes, and Congressional elections.Despite the media consistently claiming that there is no evidence, endless scientific analyses, countless anomalies, and hundreds of affidavits exist that say otherwise.Scientifically Analyzing Vote SpikesIn the early hours of November 4th, 2020, Democratic candidate Joe Biden received several major vote spikes that substantially and decisively improved his electoral position in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia.Much skepticism and uncertainty in the scientific community surrounds these vote spikes. Suspicious vote counting practices, extreme differences between the two major candidates’ vote counts, and the timing of the vote updates, among other factors, casts doubt on the legitimacy the spikes.PennsylvaniaIn Pennsylvania, there were multiple very questionable vote spikes. In the early morning hours of November 4th, one particular vote spike of 337,000 votes, almost all for Joe Biden appears in the data. Approximately only 3,000 of those votes were for President Trump.There was also a major vote spike in Georgia of approximately 107,000 votes for Joe Biden, while only a few thousand votes in the batch went for for President Trump. There were numerous other similar vote spikes in Michigan and Wisconsin, at similar times and dates, with similar results.No forensic data scientist can provide an explanation for this phenomenon, other than potential illegal ballot harvesting and other forms of fraud at a massive scale. The likelihood of these early morning vote spikes in mail-in ballots legitimately breaking for Joe Biden at the margin they did, is statistically 0% in these states.GeorgiaMichigan:Wisconsin:The Red Mirage?Many point to the ‘red mirage’ hypothesis to explain why these vote spikes favored Joe Joe Biden in key swing states. The red mirage scenario predicted that at the end of election day, it would erroneously appear that President Trump won the election because most states would count the ballots cast in-person on election day first. The hypothesis concluded that after tallying the mail-in ballots, Joe Biden would pull ahead because mail-in ballots tend to favor the democrats more than the republicans.Outside of the impossibility that these vote spikes favored Joe Biden at margins they did – some as high as 99% – this explanation is particularly impossible considering republicans led in mail-in ballots requested and mail-in and early in-person ballots returned.According to NBC News on election day, in Michigan Republicans led 41% to 39% in mail-in ballots requested. Republicans also led 42% to 39% with mail-in and early in-person ballots returned.In Wisconsin on election day , Republicans led in mail-in ballots requested 43% to 35%, and mail-in and early in-person ballots returned 43% to 35%.Historic Low Mail-in Ballot Rejection RateIn a normal election year in any given state, hundreds or even thousands of mail-in ballots get tossed out for everything from late postmarks to open envelopes.North Carolina rejected 546 ballots for just missing witness signatures in the 2012 presidential race. Virginia tossed 216 ballots in the 2018 midterms because they arrived in an unofficial envelope. Arizona discarded 1,516 ballots for non-matching signatures the same year.In October, USA Today predicted that absentee ballot rejection totals would reach historic levels.“At least 1.03 million absentee ballots could be tossed if half of the nation votes by mail. Discarded votes jump to 1.55 million if 75% of the country votes absentee. In the latter scenario, more than 185,000 votes could be lost in Florida, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin – states considered key to capturing the White House.”In Georgia alone, it was predicted that over 100,000 absentee ballots would be rejected based on the normal percentage that are rejected in an average year.That’s not what happened.Mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania specifically have been accepted at almost 30 times the rate compared to historical norms. This raises serious questions in a swing state in which Democratic challenger Joe Biden is the projected to be the winner.Reports about the rejection rate for mail-in ballots in the general election suggest that it was a fraction of a percent, which is up to 30 times lower than absentee ballots in an election without mass vote-by-mail.The below graph shows the estimated rejectable votes vs the Biden margin of victory in key swing states.Pennsylvania ImpossibilitiesIn Pennsylvania since 2016, Democrats have lost over 50,000 registered voters. During the same time period, Republicans have gained over 150,000 registered voters statewide.Not only did President Trump lose this state after leading by almost 800,000 votes on election day, but Joe Biden also annihilated Barack Obama’s 2012 numbers, as well as Hillary Clinton’s 2016 totals by 500,000 each.While President Trump dominated in Ohio, Indiana, and Florida – flipping blue counties that haven’t been red for decades – he also lost in several demographically identical counties in Pennsylvania and Georgia, and is projected to lose those states.The below graph depicts these highly questionable results.According to data scientists, there were also over 200,000 ballots either returned a day before they were mailed out, returned on the same day, or one dayMore than 20,000 absentee ballots in Pennsylvania have impossible return dates and more than 80,000 have marked return dates that raise questions, according to a researcher’s analysis of the state’s voter database.“Over 51,000 ballots were marked as returned just one day after they were sent out, while nearly 35,000 were marked returned on the same day that they were mailed out.”Another more than 23,000 have a return date earlier than the sent date. More than 9,000 have no sent date.A screenshot of publicly available mail ballot data in Pennsylvania showing the date when ballots were sent out (3rd column from right) and received (2nd column from right) only one day apart. (Data source: Pennsylvania Secretary of State)According to Politico, it was the ballots found in postal facilities that put Biden over the top in Pennsylvania. Postal workers found thousands of ballots in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh facilities Thursday after election day.There also happens to be a record number of 90-year-olds registered to vote – in one year – than at any point in Pennsylvania history.Another analysis of voting data in Pennsylvania shows that even if Joe Biden won 95% of returned Democrat mail-in votes, 21% of returned Republican votes, and 80% of returned independent votes, he would still have come up short of his margin of victory reported in the unofficial tally.Exit polls showed Biden getting just 8% of the GOP vote overall. While the 95% number for Democrat mail-ins is closer (exits showed him getting 92%), the notion that 80% of mail-in ballots from independents went to Joe Biden is impossible. Exit polls showed Joe Biden winning around 52% of the independents vote overall.Arizona ImpossibilitiesIn Arizona, Joe Biden completely blew Barack Obama’s 2008 totals out of the water by approximately 700,000 votes. This is despite the fact that republicans gained 30,000 more registered voters than democrats this year in the state. Republicans also led in registered voters by over 100,000 voters in Arizona.Even after adjusting for the voter registration increase – which republicans led in by a wide margin – a massive gap of hundreds of thousands of votes remains.Nevada ImpossibilitiesA recent analysis of Nevada vote tallies uncovered an unprecedented jump in ‘problem voter’ registrations, which will likely prove the Trump legal team with another avenue to challenge Joe Biden’s victory in another state.In an affidavit filed in the state, a data scientist found a questionable surge of incomplete voter registrations, and those giving casinos and temporary RV parks as “their home or mailing addresses.”The expert, Dorothy Morgan, said that her initial study of the records showed a ‘historically strange’ jump in voter registrations missing the sex and age of the voter, making any confirmation by poll workers impossible.She found that in the presidential election of 2016, there were 68 voter registrations missing this particular critical data. In the 2020 election, it was 13,372.Additionally, over 70% of the incomplete registrations took place between July and September of this year.In her two-page affidavit, Morgan wrote, “This investigation found over 13K voters whose voter registration information revealed no sex or date of birth. Not only does this mean we cannot verify whether these voters are old enough to vote, it is also historically strange: While one does not expect voter registration information to be perfect, it is very strange that there were very, very few of these kinds of imperfect records with missing or invalid information until this year – when there are 13,372 of them.”Several addresses were odd too, she wrote.Sworn Affidavits and Testimonies of FraudAccording to an affidavit in one Michigan lawsuit, one one particular township in the state had a voter turnout of 781.91%According to the lawsuit, the townships of Zeeland Charter and Grout had 215% and 460% respectively, while ten others had 100% turnout.In 3,000 precincts in Michigan voter turnout was reported at anywhere between 90% and over 700%.Another election lawsuit filed in Michigan alleges there was massive voter fraud in vote-counting procedures in Wayne County, a Democratic stronghold and home to the city of Detroit.Witnesses filing sworn affidavits under oath allege that Wayne County elections officials encouraged fraud, including changing legal names and dates on ballots, ballot-harvesting, voter intimidation, and preventing poll watchers from challenging irregularities in the vote-counting process.“This type of widespread fraud in the counting and processing of voter ballots cannot be allowed to stand. Michigan citizens are entitled to know that their elections are conducted in a fair and legal manner and that every legal vote is properly counted,” said David A. Kallman, an attorney with the Great Lakes Justice Center.Read this sworn affidavit from GOP poll challenger, and former Assistant AG for Michigan, Zachary Larsen, on the alleged fraud he observed in Detroit. This is Third World stuff, and every American should be outraged if these allegations are true https://t.co/63nLXJxAZF Benjamin Weingarten on Twitter— Benjamin Weingarten (@bhweingarten) November 9, 2020Another sworn statement from Detroit indicates that several boxes of ballots were brought in through the back door of the TCF center at 9pm on Wednesday. Election rules state that all ballots needed to be inputted into the system by 9pm on Tuesday, November 3rd.Election workers inputted the entire batch into the QVF system and manually added each voter to the list after 9pm.Here's some more of the shenanigans detailed in a lawsuit coming out of Detroit on raft of alleged fraudulent actions observed during election night count. What does Joe Biden have to say about these allegations? Are these witnesses Russian traitors too? https://t.co/JPrGh4uNo6 Benjamin Weingarten on Twitter— Benjamin Weingarten (@bhweingarten) November 9, 2020Another part of the statement claims election workers assigned ballots to random names already in the Qualified Voter File to people who haven’t voted in the 2020 election. The sworn statement alleges that election workers systematically used false information in order to be able to process the absentee ballots, such as false birthdays.“Election workers assigned ballots to random names already in the QVF to a person who had not voted. Defendants systematically used false information to process absentee ballots, such as using incorrect of false birthdays. Many times the election workers inserted new names into the QVF after the election and recorded these new voters as having a birthdate of 1/1/1900”Outperforming Election NormsBiden underperformed Hillary Clinton’s 2016 totals in every urban county in the United States, yet he outperformed her in only the metropolitan counties of Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.Biden is set to become the first president in six decades to lose Ohio and Florida, yet win the presidential election. For over 100 years, these states have consistently predicted the national outcome of the election.Joe Biden lost almost every historic bellwether county across the country, yet is on his way to becoming the 46th president of the United States. The Wall Street Journal recently analyzed the results of 19 counties around the United States that have almost perfect presidential voting prediction records over the last four decades. President Trump won every single county, except Clallam County in Washington state.Additionally, Joe Biden received more votes than any other candidate in history, despite Democrats’ massive and widespread losses in the House of Representatives.Donald Trump was the only incumbent president in U.S. history to lose his re-election while his own party gained seats in the House of Representatives.Confirmed ErrorsOn and after election day, there were several confirmed reporting errors that were fixed upon being revealed by journalists as they watched the numbers roll in.• ArizonaIn Arizona according to Politico, an error found in Edison Research data that was identified by a journalist showed that 98% of the vote had been counted on November 4th in Arizona when in fact only 84% of the vote had been counted. Officials corrected this mistake when it was pointed out.• GeorgiaIn Georgia, Voters were unable to cast machine ballots for a couple of hours in Morgan and Spalding counties after the electronic devices crashed, state officials said.The companies “uploaded something last night, which is not normal, and it caused a glitch,” said Marcia Ridley, elections supervisor at Spalding County Board of Election. That glitch prevented poll workers from using the pollbooks to program smart cards that the voters insert into the voting machines.“That is something that they don’t ever do. I’ve never seen them update anything the day before the election,” Ridley said. Ridley said she did not know what the upload contained.Additionally in four Georgia counties, there were misplaced memory cards with votes that officials forgot to upload and tally. When the memory cards were discovered, the uncounted voted decreased the margin in the state by a few thousand votes.• MichiganThere was also something suspicious about the vote reporting in Antrim County, Michigan, where Trump beat Hillary Clinton by 30 points in 2016. Initial vote totals there showed Biden ahead of Trump by 29 points, a result that can’t possibly be accurate, as plenty of journalists noted.When NY Times journalist Ben Rothenberg pointed this out on Twitter, they corrected the totals and called this an ‘error.’Antrim County, Michigan makes no sense. Ben Rothenberg on Twitter— Ben Rothenberg (@BenRothenberg) November 4, 2020According to the Detroit Free Press, a USA Today affiliate, officials further investigated the wonky election results in Antrim County.Antrim County Clerk Sheryl Guy said results on electronic tapes and a computer were somehow scrambled after the cards were transported in sealed bags from township precincts to county offices and uploaded onto a computer.In 2016, Trump won Antrim County with about 62% of the vote, compared with about 33% for Democrat Hillary Clinton. Trump beat Clinton by about 4,000 votes.The day after election day, Antrim results showed Democrat Joe Biden leading Trump by slightly more than 3,000 votes, with 98% of precincts reporting.These results were of course reversed.In Oakland County’s 15th county commission district, a fixed computer glitch turned a losing Republican into a winner. A computer error led election officials in Oakland County to hand an upset victory Wednesday to a Democrat, only to switch the win back to an incumbent Republican a day later. The incumbent, Adam Kochenderfer appeared to lose by a few hundred votes, an outcome that seemed odd to many in his campaign. After the apparent computer error was found and fixed, Kochenderfer ended up winning by over 1,000 votes.There were many other confirmed errors, including in Virginia where 100,000 extra votes were tallied for Joe Biden, and more may be revealed as the weeks go on.Georgia ChaosIn just three counties, Joe Biden’s campaign was able to surpass Barack Obama’s historic 2008 performance by a combined 302,576 votes.This is nearly 24 times more than the current margin of 12,670 votes, in a state Trump won in 2016. The results defy reason.There were also many processing delays, specifically in Fulton county Georgia where a pipe suddenly ‘burst’ in the processing center.On November 4th, at approximately 6:07 a.m., the staff at State Farm Arena notified Fulton County Registration and Elections of a burst pipe affecting the room where absentee ballots were being tabulated.As of 7 p.m. on Wednesday Fulton County Elections officials said 30,000 absentee ballots were not processed due to a pipe burst. Officials reassured voters that none of the ballots were damaged and the water was quickly cleaned up.But the emergency delayed officials from processing ballots between 5:30 a.m. and 9:30 a.m.Officials in Georgia have not been able to produce any invoices or work orders related to a “burst pipe” at Atlanta’s State Farm Arena that was blamed for an abrupt pause in vote counting on election night.According to Georgia GOP Chairman David Shafer, a third county in Georgia discovered a memory card with uncounted votes, a majority of which were cast for President Donald Trump.“Our monitors tell us that Walton County election officials have found a memory card that was apparently not uploaded. The number of uncounted votes is not as large as in Floyd or Fayette but the President will pick up votes,” Shafer said on Twitter.Previously, in Georgia’s Floyd and Fayette Counties, memory cards were also discovered with uncounted votes, mostly for President Trump. Of the roughly over 5,000 total votes discovered, approximately two thirds of those votes were for President Donald Trump.The memory cards unearthed in the three counties add up to over 1,400 net votes for Trump, closing his gap with Biden from 14,156 minus 12,753.Georgia’s Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger blamed the problem on Floyd County election officials failing to upload votes from a memory card in a ballot-scanning machine.Former Data Chief and Strategist for Trump for President, Matt Braynard also recently discovered an alarming trend happening in Georgia.Postal facilities like UPS and FedEx were apparently used to cast votes, with their addresses disguised as apartments.Update:– Sample of the postal facilities (USPS, FedEx, UPS) addresses disguised as apartments, etc. in Georgia.I will release the full dataset for GA and PA with the package that includes the survey toplines, etc. Matt Braynard on Twitter— Matt Braynard (@MattBraynard) November 24, 2020According to Braynard, in Georgia nearly 100% of the voters who disguised a postal facility as their residential address voted absentee, with nearly zero voting on Election Day.Under federal law, it is illegal to use a post office mailing address to cast your ballot. According to section 2 of this federal document, you cannot use a post office box mailing address.Even if it was legally allowed under federal law to use a PO box as a residential address for your ballot, most of the postal facilities found in the data do not even have post office boxes at their facilities.Thus far, Braynard and his team have discovered nearly 1400 early and absentee voters who have registered their residential addresses to postal facilities.Massive Enthusiasm GapJoe Biden with almost record low enthusiasm, underperformed across many major cities compared to Hillary Clinton in 2016.In New York City, Chicago, and Miami, he was down 201,408, 260,835, and 6,945 respectively.However, in the states Biden needed to overtake Trump in 2020, he gained massively. According to the Associated Press vote total data, in Atlanta, Milwaukee, and Pittsburg, he was up 76,518, 67,630, and 29,150 respectively.There's more and I could continue….but nuff said…..

MAIL-IN VOTER FRAUD: New Jersey Dems CHARGED Over Possession Of Ballots(Patriotic Post)- While the Democrats continue pushing the lie that mail-in voting doesn’t present a unique challenge in preventing fraud, Democrats are being arrested and charged for…electoral fraud. Two Democrat councilmen from Paterson, New Jersey, who were working on a councilman’s campaign in the region have been arrested and charged with committing electoral fraud. The two men were understood to have been in the possession of mail-in ballots, and were in the process of trying to fix an election.New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal announced last week that electoral fraud charges would be filed against Councilman-elect Alex Mendez, City Councilman Michael Jackson, as well as Abu Rayzen and Shelim Khalique.Khalique is the brother of Shanin Khalique, another member of the Paterson city council. You might know this area for being the city that recently allowed the Islamic call of prayer to be played in public. Abu Rayzen was an activist connected to Khalique’s election campaign.Four Democrats, all involved with electoral fraud – despite their part claiming it doesn’t exist. Stacey Abrams, the woman who has been positioning herself as Biden’s best VP option for months, even claimed that mail-in electoral fraud is a myth.Clearly it’s not!The charges suggest that Jackson violated election laws in New Jersey by collecting mail-in ballots from people in the city. He then delivered those ballots to the Passaic County Board of Election. When he dropped off the ballots to the board, Jackson allegedly didn’t identify who he was. One of the ballots delivered to the Board of Elections was unsealed and hadn’t been filled in.Jackson was charged with third-degree fraud in casting a mail-in vote, as well as third-degree tampering with public records, fourth-degree falsifying or tampering with records, and third-degree unauthorized possession of ballots.Do you see why this is a problem? Anyone who takes your ballot can open it, fill it in, or change it, before delivering it to the Board of Elections.Charges allege that Mendez also violated state laws by collecting ballots from local voters and then delivering them without identifying himself. Even more troubling, the charges say that he knew the ballots were fraudulent and were even filled out by people who weren’t eligible to vote.People who cannot vote in this country voted fraudulently and these Democrat activists delivered the votes.All of the men now face between three and five years in prison for their third-degree charges, and up to a further 18 months for their fourth-degree crimes. The second-degree crimes committed all come in at up to 10 years – meaning they’re likely to be behind bars for a while. Oh, and they could be asked to pay up to $250,000 in fines.Locals will now doubt celebrate that the fraud was caught, but what about the instances where it isn’t? How many times could this happen in November if the Democrats get their way?The Paterson, New Jersey City Council election ended in massive allegations of voter fraud and a city council member and a council member-elect were arrested for alleged voter fraud.POLITICO NJ’s Matt Friedman reported that, “Four people were arrested yesterday for alleged voter fraud during the Paterson municipal election, including Councilman Michael Jackson, Councilman-elect Alex Mendez and Shelim Khalique — the brother of Councilman Shanin Shalique, whose election ended in a tie. The fourth defendant, who faces the most minor charges, is a 21-year-old Prospect Park resident who allegedly illegally harvested ballots.”In this election, 800 mail-in ballots were found in a Paterson mail box and another 2,300 votes were disqualified because the signatures did not match.That meant of the 16,000 votes cast in this election, one out of five were disqualified for being fraudulent.Local resident Ramona Javier explained to NBC News the depth of the fraud.“We did not receive vote by mail ballots and thus we did not vote,” she said in Spanish. When she was shown an official list of some of the people who voted on her block – and that her name was on that list — Javier told NBC, “This is corruption. This is fraud.”Voter fraud is real.And contrary to Schumer’s false claims, instituting nation-wide vote-by-mail just months before the presidential election will lead to widespread fraud.The following article, MORE VOTER FRAUD: USPS Worker in New Jersey Charged for Mail Tampering, Dumping Election Ballots, was first published on Big League Politics.A U.S. Postal Service employee from Hudson County, New Jersey has been arrested and charged with throwing away mail, which included election ballots.The mail carrier allegedly disposed of 99 general election ballots when discarding the cache of mail. U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito announced the delay of mail and obstruction of mail charges on Wednesday. 26-year-old Nicholas Beauchene of Kearny is accused of committing the crime.If Beauchene is convicted of delay of mail, he could face up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. If he is convicted on the obstruction of mail charge, he could face up to six months in prison and a fine of $5,000. Court documents indicate that approximately 1,875 pieces of mail were discarded as part of this scheme.“The recovered mail was placed back into the mail stream for delivery to its intended recipients. Copies of the recovered mail were made and retained as evidence,” the Department of Justice wrote in their press release about the charges.Big League Politics has reported on other instances of Democrat voter fraud in New Jersey, which is a sign of things to come for the rest of the nation:THREE NEW JERSEY DEMOCRAT POLITICIANS ARE BEING CHARGED WITH FRAUD RELATING TO A MAIL-IN VOTING SCAM THAT ALLEGEDLY HAPPENED AS A RESULT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.THE CHARGES HAVE BEEN FILED AGAINST A CITY COUNCILMAN, A COUNCILMAN-ELECT, THE BROTHER OF ANOTHER COUNCILMAN, AND A FOURTH INDIVIDUAL FOR ELECTION FRAUD IN MAY’S SPECIAL ELECTION. THE ENTIRE ELECTION WAS CONDUCTED VIA MAIL-IN VOTING DUE TO FEARS RELATED TO THE CORONAVIRUS.NJ 1ST WARD COUNCILMAN MICHAEL JACKSON IS ACCUSED OF COLLECTING MAIL-IN BALLOTS AND GIVING THEM TO THE PASSAIC COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS WITHOUT INDICATING THAT HE WAS THE OFFICIAL BEARER WITH HIS SIGNATURE. PROSECUTORS ALSO ALLEGE THAT JACKSON HANDED IN AT LEAST ONE BALLOT BEFORE IT HAD BEEN PROPERLY FILLED OUT.IN ADDITION, ALEX MENDEZ, ANOTHER DEMOCRAT WHO WAS VICTORIOUS IN THE 3RD WARD ELECTION, ALLEGEDLY COLLECTED MAIL-IN BALLOTS FROM DIFFERENT VOTERS AND SUBMITTED FRAUDULENT VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATIONS.JACKSON WON RE-ELECTION WITH 844 VOTES WHILE HIS OPPONENTS RECEIVED 599 AND 490 VOTES, RESPECTIVELY. MENDEZ WON HIS POST WITH 1,595 VOTES WITH HIS NEAREST COMPETITION RECEIVING 1,350 VOTES.THE U.S. POSTAL INSPECTION SERVICE BECAME AWARE OF THE ALLEGED SCAM WHEN THEY FOUND SEVERAL HUNDRED MAIL-IN BALLOTS THAT WERE “BUNDLED” IN A MAILBOX IN PATERSON, WITH HUNDREDS OF OTHER BALLOTS FOUND IN A DIFFERENT MAILBOX IN NEARBY HALEDON. OVERALL, THERE WERE AT LEAST 800 BALLOTS IMPLICATED IN THE ALLEGED SCAM. THIS WAS ENOUGH TO POTENTIALLY INFLUENCE THE RESULTS OF LAST MONTH’S ELECTIONS.OTHER INSTANCES OF ALLEGED FRAUD WERE REPORTEDLY A FAMILY AFFAIR. SHELIM KHALIQUE, A 51-YEAR-OLD WAYNE RESIDENT, WHOSE COUNCILMAN BROTHER, SHAHIM KHALIQUE, WON BY JUST A FEW VOTES AS A CANDIDATE IN THE 2ND WARD, IS ACCUSED OF ILLEGALLY COLLECTING AND DELIVERING MAIL-IN BALLOTS AS WELL. KHALIQUE IS ALSO FACING CHARGES OF ILLEGALLY EMPLOYING A SEX OFFENDER FOR HIS TRANSPORTATION COMPANY AND HIRING SCHOOL BUS DRIVERS WITHOUT QUALIFICATIONS.Democrats are seemingly attempting a brazen vote steal while accusing President Trump and his supporters of doing exactly what they are trying to pull off. This is Satanic levels of deception, and it is hard to conceive how the Republic can survive without these interests being punished severely for their blatant treason.Ex-Postal Service worker charged with tossing absentee ballots in dumpsterThe Associated Press 2 hrs agoEx-Postal Service worker charged with tossing absentee ballots in dumpsterLOUISVILLE, Ky. — A former U.S. Postal Service worker was charged with tossing dozens of absentee ballots and other mail that was found in a dumpster in Kentucky, the U.S. attorney's office said.© Provided by NBC NewsDeShawn Bojgere, 30, of Louisville, was charged with delay or destruction of mail, a news release from U.S. Attorney Russell Coleman's office said in a news release Monday.told Postal Service special agents that he was responsible for discarding the mail, prosecutors said. He faces up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine if convicted.It was not known whether he is represented by a lawyer who could comment on his behalf.Critical Swing State of PA: 372,000 Mail-In Ballots Rejected After Discovering 90% Were DUPLICATESBy Patty McMurray | Oct 17, 2020On Dec. 2, 2016, Donald J. Trump won the formerly blue state of Pennsylvania by only 44,292 votes.On November 29th, the New York Times reported that Donald Trump was winning the state with 2,959,839 votes, while former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton won 2,895,436 votes. Donald J. Trump had 64,403 more votes than Hillary Clinton.Trump’s lead shrunk significantly after the final certified results in Pennsylvania showed Donald Trump winning the state with 2,970,411 votes, while former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton got only 2,926,411 votes. Trump’s lead in Pennsylvania dropped by 20,111 votes after counties wrapped up the counting of overseas ballots and settled provisional ballot challenges.Real Clear Politics reports – There’s little doubt that as the number of mail-in ballots increases, so does fraud. A 2012 report in The New York Times noted that voter fraud involving mail-in ballots “is vastly more prevalent than the in-person voting fraud that has attracted far more attention, election administrators say. In Florida, absentee-ballot scandals seem to arrive like clockwork around election time.” According to a Wall Street Journal report on voter exploitation in Hispanic communities in Texas, mail-in ballots have “spawned a mini-industry of consultants who get out the absentee vote, sometimes using questionable techniques.” Poor, elderly, and minority communities are most likely to be preyed upon by so-called ballot “brokers.”Concerns about fraud in mail-in ballots were serious enough that a 2008 report produced by the CalTech/MIT Voting Technology Project recommended that states “restrict or abolish on-demand absentee voting in favor of in-person early voting.”A whopping 372,000 applications for mail-in ballots in the critical swing state of PA have been rejected, because it was discovered they were duplicates—yes, duplicates!Fox News– Pennsylvania has cast off hundreds of thousands of applications for mail-in ballots ahead of the 2020 election, because of confusion about the process.About 372,000 requests were rejected, as reported by ProPublica on Friday, largely because many of them, about 90%, were duplicates. Overall, one out of every five requests for mail-in ballots are being rejected, according to the publication.The main reason? Many people who voted during the June primaries may have already checked a box to request a mail-in ballot for the November election.However, people who made more than one request should eventually receive their ballot, a spokesperson for the Pennsylvania State Department said. They can also head to the polls on Election Day.The spokesperson said about 2 million people have selected an option to automatically have ballots sent for the current calendar year, meaning they do not need to reapply.More than 2.7 million Pennsylvanians have requested mail-in ballots this election.Pro Publica reports- Though it may deter some people from voting, the mass rejection of ballot applications is unlikely to have a big effect on turnout. Voters who submitted duplicate applications should eventually receive a ballot. Those who don’t can still vote at the polls on Election Day.An estimated 208,000 Pennsylvania voters sent in the spurned requests, some submitting them multiple times. Although the state’s email rejecting the requests describes them as duplicates, it doesn’t explain why, prompting some people to reapply. ProPublica and The Philadelphia Inquirer identified hundreds of voters who submitted three or more duplicate applications; one voter appears to have submitted 11 duplicates.The state is expecting a record volume of ballots to be sent by mail and, as it stands, counties can’t begin the cumbersome process necessary to ultimately tally those votes until Election Day.There is concern that the longer it takes Pennsylvania to tally its final vote count, the more likely it is that there will be misgivings about the security of the process.Trump’s Attorney General William Barr said in a CNN interview on Wednesday that those who are “trying to change the rules” of voting procedures ahead of the November elections are “playing with fire.”In a sometimes-heated interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, Barr did not back down on the issue of mail-in balloting.When Blitzer attempted to point out to Barr that several states including Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Utah and Washington state already vote primarily by mail, Barr fired back.“This is playing with fire,” Barr said. “We’re a very closely divided country here, and people have to have confidence in the legitimacy of the government, and people trying to change the rules to this methodology, which as a matter of logic is very open to fraud and coercion, is reckless and dangerous, and people are playing with fire.”Barr then cited a 2005 Commission on Election Reform report to back up his argument.The commission was chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker, and concluded that mail-in voting is “likely to increase the risks of fraud and of contested elections.”The intensified debate regarding mail-in voting is boiling over with less than two months before the November presidential and congressional elections.Once again, as Barr showed, the evidence is clear that total mail-in balloting is fraught with danger and could literally destroy our republican form of government if not stopped.Ex-elections judge pleads guilty to stuffing ballot box for Democratic candidates in multiple electionsMay 23, 2020byJen KrauszA former election judge in Pennsylvania has pleaded guilty to charges that he stuffed ballot boxes in multiple elections after accepting bribes to help Democratic contenders win their races.Domenick J. DeMuro, who oversaw elections in South Philadelphia during primaries between 2014 and 2016, admitted to taking money from political consultants in exchange for casting multiple ballots for specific candidates.While holding the elected and paid position, DeMuro engaged in a “conspiracy to deprive voters of civil rights” and violated the Travel Act “by using a cellphone, in interstate commerce,” to promote bribery, as his plea agreement states.“Voting over and over”U.S. Attorney William M. McSwain described the nature of the fraud, which resulted in the addition of dozens of votes to machines in each of three elections, representing as much as 22% of the total ballots cast.“DeMuro fraudulently stuffed the ballot box by literally standing in a voting booth and voting over and over, as fast as he could, while he thought the coast was clear,” McSwain said.The prosecutor called voting “the cornerstone of our democracy,” asserting that when “even one vote is fraudulently rung up, the integrity of that election is compromised.”Court records did not indicate which candidates the fraudulent voting helped or whether they won their respective races. McSwain’s office continues its investigation, which is focused on one unnamed consultant believed to have paid DeMuro to stuff the ballot box.“Not removing voters who have died”President Donald Trump has increased his attention on the issue of voter fraud as the 2020 presidential election draws near.Several states are advancing plans to expand mail-in voting options in an effort to limit exposure to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. Trump, however, maintains such options come with an unacceptable risk of corruption.According to RealClearPolitics, a total of about 28 million mail-in ballots went missing in the last four elections. Furthermore, Judicial Watch announced in January that it had located millions of names on voter rolls that should have been removed.“An unusually high registration rate suggests that a jurisdiction is not removing voters who have died or who have moved elsewhere, as required by [federal law],” the organization wrote.America is less than six months away from a pivotal presidential race amid deep divisions regarding the best path forward for the nation. It might be more important now than ever to ensure Americans can trust the results of that election.Award Winning Democrat Just Got Served With A Stack Of Felony ChargesThe Democratic Party loves the “unconventional methods” of Michigan party official Sherikia Hawkins so much that they gave her an award. Her methods were so unusual that she was arrested on six felony charges. Hawkins engaged the community in voting by “forging records and falsely marking absentee ballots as invalid” during the 2018 midterm election.An award for election fraudEarlier this year, Democrat party official Sherikia Hawkins was proud to accept a prize for her valuable service to the Democratic cause. She was honored with the Dingell/Levin Award for using “unconventional methods to engage the community in voting.” As they say on their website, “Sherikia takes pride in using unconventional methods to engage the community in voting.”Those methods were a little too unconventional. The Detroit News reports that Hawkins was “charged with forging records and falsely marking absentee ballots as invalid.” The 38-year-old Southfield city clerk was arrested recently when the County Clerk in Oakland County noticed something fishy.There were alarming “discrepancies” in the voter counts from Southfield. When police investigators did some digging, they “found that records had been altered so that nearly 200 voter files were improperly listed as invalid.”Their Secretary of State is furious. “Our elections are the foundation of our democracy, and under my and Attorney General [Dana] Nessel’s administration there will be no tolerance for any actions that undermine that foundation — anywhere, anytime, by any person or official,” Jocelyn Benson firmly declared in a statement. Even if they do win an award.Changes made in the computersThe court documents reveal that Michigan police discovered that 193 of the absentee voter files “were changed in the city’s computer system to say they either had no signature or no return date, when they had both valid signatures and return dates.”:When they alerted the Oakland County Election Director about the illegally altered records, Joseph Rozell’s staff “found the original ones in a trashcan at the election division office.” Despite all the evidence, her attorney argues that “it was just a technicality.” He should get an acting award just for saying that with a straight face.Secretary of State Benson assures the voters that they caught the fraud in time and it didn’t change the election’s outcome. “All valid votes in the election were ultimately counted and the final official vote total was accurate,” she promises.After the dust settled, Hawkins faces charges of falsifying records in violation of state election law, forgery of a public record, misconduct in office and three counts of using a computer to commit a crime. The most severe of those charges carries a potential penalty of 14 years in prison. For now she’s on the streets, after posting $15,000 bail.Report Exposes Major Flaws in Mail-In Voting, Could Change Outcome of ElectionMajor Flaw in Mail-In Voting Exposed - Could Change Election OutcomeBy C. Douglas GoldenPublished July 31, 2020 at 8:50amIf there’s one hard-and-fast rule that has been set for conservatives during the unusual 2020 election process, it’s this: Don’t step into the mail-in voting minefield.There’s an official line that’s been set. Mail-in voting is terrific. It’s better than in-person voting, in fact. Why don’t we make it this easy all the time? It’s the greatest thing to happen to liberty and freedom since the Magna Carta.Every time you express the slightest doubt about the mechanics of national mail-in voting and whether it could affect the results of the 2020 election, the soul of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. sheds a single tear in heaven.For the humor-challenged, this is what the kids like to call hyperbole. I don’t feel bad engaging in it because, well, everyone engages in hyperbole when they’re talking about mail-in voting.I’ve noticed a trend behind almost every argument I read on social media regarding the issue: If you aren’t making the most extreme case for your position, so extreme that it verges on self-parody, all the while claiming you absolutely know every one of the pertinent facts about the process and how they all line up in your favor, you’re doing it wrong.This puts me in an odd position because my opposition to universal mail-in voting comes from a place of caution about an untried process.It’s that I merely know that we can’t know what’s going to happen when the tortoise-like evolution of America’s electoral process over 232 years is completely upended in the space of about six months because we’ve concluded there’s no way to socially distance during the in-person voting process. (Even though there’s no evidence in-person voting increases COVID-19 risk.)We want every American to be able to place his or her vote via mail without knowing what the implications of that are — assuming we’ll end up with the same result we would have otherwise.The proof from proponents of universal mail-in voting that it’ll be foolproof comes via a small number of states that automatically send registered voters mail-in ballots.According to The Washington Post, those states are California, Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington and Utah — only one of which, Colorado, has even the slightest chance of being a presidential swing state this November. (And even that’s exceedingly unlikely — President Donald Trump would be well-advised not to go near there except to support incumbent GOP Sen. Cory Gardner, who faces an uphill re-election battle.)While you can request an absentee ballot in most states — either without giving a reason or by listing fear of COVID-19 as a reason — and a number of states have expanded absentee voting access, that’s not quite a barrier-free mail-in voting system. Rest assured, you’re going to see that pushed for over the next few months, and hard.So what’s the big deal?Well, CBS News decided to run a controlled test of what might happen if there was widespread mail-in voting this November.In Philadelphia, Tony Dokoupil of “CBS This Morning” took 100 mock ballots and mailed them in different parts of the city to an address that had been set up as a mock board of elections.In the experiment, 21 percent of one of the batches of ballots didn’t arrive after three days.Three percent didn’t arrive at all.If 3 percent sounds like a small number, consider that Pennsylvania was decided by a 0.7 percent margin back in 2016.They did get “a birthday card from Mike to Ronnie,” though, so there’s that.Trump shared the video Wednesday on Twitter and waded further into the fray shortly after, sending this tweet:As for mail-in voting being “an easy way for foreign countries to enter the race” — well, as Wikipedia might put it, that’s very much [citation needed]. In terms of the problems with an accurate count and “testing areas [being] way off,” while the Philadelphia test was just one experiment, it also wasn’t a promising one.Keep in mind, this test only measured whether a mailed-in ballot arrived at the “board of elections.” The problem with the conditions is that the U.S. Post Office would be involved both ways — meaning the same service that didn’t deliver 3 percent of the ballots was also assumed to have a 100 percent record delivering those ballots to voters in the first place.And this test happened during a period where the USPS wasn’t being swamped with ballots — which it would be during the election. Whatever mistakes are present now would be magnified then.This is to say nothing about problematic practices such as “ballot harvesting” — the ethically questionable practice where third parties are authorized to collect mail-in ballots, something Democrats used to great effect during the 2018 midterms — and other potential unforeseen issues with the system.By the way, Democrats should be concerned about this, too.The Washington Post reported in May that “voting by mail increases the number of ballots that are rejected — and not counted in the final tally. And ballots from younger, minority and first-time voters are most likely to be thrown out.”In liberal California, The Associated Press reported over 100,000 mail-in ballots were rejected during the March primary, roughly 1.5 percent of ballots sent in by mail.Why does this happen?“It’s not entirely clear,” The Post reported in May. “On the one hand, there may be reasons some groups of voters are more likely to make mistakes when voting by mail. Many new voters — for example young and first-time registrants — may be unfamiliar with how to vote by mail, or not know how much postage is required or how far in advance to return the ballot to have it arrive on time. Mail voters don’t have the benefit of interacting face-to-face with poll workers who might be able to help them navigate any difficulties.”There’s too much we don’t know about the system.A basic test, just seeing how many of the ballots could be delivered if and assuming the ballots got to the voters and were mailed on time during a period where the system was working efficiently, found 3 percent didn’t arrive.If that happened in November on a massive, national scale, it could be the kind of major flaw in a system that can change an election.That’s not making an extreme case for anything. It’s merely stating some very inconvenient facts about a process we’ve been assured is 100 percent safe.Michigan's Secretary of State, Jocelyn Bensen just announced that about 10,600 mail-in ballots from the state's August primary election were rejected outright and A WHOPPING 846 BALLOTS WERE REJECTED BECAUSE THE VOTER WAS DEAD.Nevada mailed ballots to all of it's citizens and close to a QUARTER OF A MILLION were returned by the Post Office as "undeliverable" in Clarke County alone.In Patterson, New Jersey alone, one of of every five mail in ballots were disqualified, in a recent primary electionAccording to WJLA (ABC 7), "absentee ballot applications with incorrect information were mailed to more than half a million residents in the Commonwealth" of Virginia.In New York, over 84,000 mail-in ballots had to be tossed out and in California, about 1.5 percent of the total vote had to be tossed.Don't believe the media. Mail-in ballots ARE a RECIPE FOR FRAUD and the ONLY questions that remain are: How many fraudulent votes are STILL being counted in our elections, and how many legitimate ballots are NOT BEING COUNTED.For months, Michelle Obama has been working hand-in-glove with Hollywood, and the Democrat elites with her new group, When We All Vote.Her group is dedicated to registering new voters, along with promoting “vote by mail,” which many consider as “cheat by mail.”Their scheme is to get ballots mailed out to every voter, so they can mail in their ballot.For many months, President Trump and his allies have been warning that this system is ripe for fraud.But the Fake News Media has painted that as nothing more than a conspiracy theory.They allege that not only is vote-by-mail safe, but that it is safer than traditional voting.That claim is based not on fact, but rather on misinformation.In reality, this system of voting has been proven to be insecure, and it came from a National Public Radio (NPR) report.The NPR report shows that 550,000 mail-in votes were rejected in the primary season.This is a massive increase from the 2016 election, where 318,000 mail-in votes were rejected in the primary.People have always voted by mail, but through absentee ballots, which require the request of a ballot.Universal mail-in voting forcibly sends ballots to everybody, which creates massive opportunities for fraud, especially in cities, where the harvesting of ballots in places like apartment complexes can be very fruitful.While absentee voting requests are only sent to those who request them, mail-in-voting lets political operatives set on shady behavior know that they can find ballots anywhere.And they can often find ballots sent to people who have since moved, or are deceased, and use them for their own political gain.This NPR report proves that the work of Michelle Obama is for nothing more than voter fraud.If she is able to succeed in implementing vote-by-mail, it will allow Democrats to rig the election against President Donald Trump.Democrats have already proven, in cities like Chicago, that they are not afraid to commit voter fraud.There has been a rash of recent arrests around the country. Although those who have been charged are entitled to a presumption of innocence, these cases illustrate the types of fraud that have occurred and can occur that threaten our democratic system.In New Hampshire, Attorney General Gordon MacDonald announced an indictment against a woman for allegedly voting in the town of Derry during the 2018 general election despite residing in Washington D.C., not New Hampshire.The indictment says she submitted a false voter registration form and then voted using an absentee ballot.In Hooksett, New Hampshire, Michael Lewis has been charged with illegally voting in the 2016 general election even though he is a resident of Georgia, where he was arrested at the request of New Hampshire authorities.The Coalition of New Hampshire Taxpayers, run by registered Democrat Ed Naile, discovered that Lewis used the state’s same-day voter registration law in Hooksett to illegally register and vote.And those are not the only recent cases from the Granite State.Vincent Marzello was arrested for voting twice in the 2016 general election in West Lebanon, New Hampshire, once as himself and then again under the name of a woman, Helen Elisabeth Ashley.In California, a man by the name of Caesar Peter Abutin was charged with three counts of felony voter fraud. Despite Abutin’s mother passing away in 2006, he voted under her name multiple times between October 2012 and November 2014, in addition to casting ballots under his own name.These cases demonstrate how sometimes it can take years for the evidence in election fraud cases to come to fruition and for the potential fraudsters to face justice.Additionally, it’s worth noting that election fraud cases often involve absentee ballots.The danger posed to voters by such ballots, which are voted outside the supervision of election officials and outside the observation of poll watchers in unsecure settings, is shown by a video that has just surfaced from Escondido, California.A local resident, David Sprouse, filmed an individual walking through his neighborhood last week stealing mail—including absentee ballots—from his home and other houses.And the Virginia State Board of Elections had to send out a press release warning voters that six Richmond-area mailboxes—which may have contained absentee ballots—were broken into over the first weekend in October.Other threats to the security of voting by mail are coming to light.Take Hudson County, New Jersey. A postal worker was arrested for discarding mail after an investigation conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice found more than 1,800 pieces of mail, including 99 absentee ballots, in a dumpster.Fortunately, these ballots were recovered and forwarded to their intended recipients. Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident.Thomas Cooper, a postal worker, pleaded guilty to obscuring, crossing out, and changing at least five party affiliations on absentee ballot request forms back in July during the West Virginia primary.In Manatee County, Florida, Larry Wiggins, a registered Democrat, was arrested for requesting an absentee ballot for his late wife, who passed away in 2018. Though Wiggins claims he was simply “testing the system,” he is now facing third-degree felony charges.In Texas, four people, including a Gregg County commissioner, were arrested last month in connection with their alleged involvement in a vote-harvesting scheme that was uncovered by the state Attorney General’s Office.Commissioner Shannon Brown, Marlena Jackson, Charlie Burns, and DeWayne Ward are facing more than 130 felony charges, including organizing an illegal vote-harvesting scheme, illegal voting, fraudulent use of absentee ballot applications, unlawful possession of absentee ballots, and election fraud in connection with the 2018 general election, which Brown won by only five votes.Another case out of the Lone Star State involves a mayoral candidate for the city of Carrollton. Zul Mirza Mohamed is alleged to have forged at least 84 voter registration forms for unwitting residents of Denton County, and then obtained absentee ballots in their names without their knowledge using a virtual mailbox and a false identity.The Texas Attorney General’s Office states that at the time of his arrest, Mohamed was completing more fraudulent mail-in ballot applications.There are also multiple reports of problems being caused by election officials using inaccurate, error-filled voter registration lists to mail out absentee ballots. Those include:A German journalist who reports that he received three ballots at his residence in Washington, D.C., for the previous tenant, who moved five years ago; the landlady, who now lives in Puerto Rico; and the landlady’s deceased husband.New Jersey residents across the state reporting that they have received absentee ballots for their deceased relatives.Clerical errors that sent 1,400 Virginia voters two mail-in ballots for the general election.Close to 100,000 New York City voters receiving mail-in ballots with incorrect names and addresses.An acquaintance of one of the writers living in Washington, D.C., who received five ballots in the mail—two for him, one for his roommate, and two for individuals who haven’t lived at his address for years. Those ballots can be seen here:This summary of recent cases doesn’t even cover the 1,000 voters referred to law enforcement officials in Georgia for voting twice in that state’s June primary (once in person and a second time with an absentee ballot); or the former Democratic congressman and erstwhile political consultant indicted in Philadelphia on charges of bribing an election official to stuff the ballot box with fraudulent votes in multiple elections; or the illegal aliens indicted in North Carolina for illegally registering and voting.While many on the left dismiss these threats and insist that voting by mail has no potential for fraud, or that other types of fraud just don’t happen, these stories continue to break, dispelling that narrative.These cases should be investigated and prosecuted, and reforms should be initiated that remedy the vulnerabilities in our voter registration and election system that will prevent and deter these types of actions from occurring in the future.No matter who the American people elect, it should be done in a fair, free, and secure process.Election fraud is already a problem. Soon it could be a crisis. But election fraud is not the only threat to the integrity of our election system.Progressives are pushing for nine "reforms" that could increase the opportunity for fraud and dissolve the integrity of constitutional elections. To counter these dangerous measures, our friends at The Heritage Foundation are proposing seven measures to protect your right to vote and ensure fair, constitutional elections.Biden Texas Political Director Among Dems Alleged to Be Involved in Ballot Harvesting in Legal Case FiledWe reported earlier about Project Veritas’ investigation into ballot harvesting scandal in Minnesota with alleged connections to Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN).But that’s not the only place with accusations of Democratic ballot harvesting.A legal case was just filed in Texas in which alleges ballot harvesting going on in Harris County and that Democrats including the Texas Political Director for Joe Biden, Dallas Jones, are involved.According to the affidavits filed by a retired Houston police captain Mark Aguirre and Charles Marler, a former FBI agent, they claim they have video evidence, documentary evidence and witnesses that there was illegal ballot harvesting going on. According to the affidavits, there was hoarding of “mail-in and absentee ballots” and having operatives fill them out for people illegally, “including dead people, homeless people, and nursing home residents.” Both men are now private investigators.Aguirre claimed ballot harvesters have been exploiting the elderly with the help of some nursing home staff.I have in my possession video-taped interviews of witnesses attesting to the aforementioned people having groups of people completing thousands of absentee and mail-in ballots, including completing ballots for deceased individuals; illegally going into nursing homes, with the complicity of the nursing home staff, and filling out and forging the signatures of nursing home residents; signing up homeless individuals to vote using the ballot harvester’s address then completing the ballot and forging the homeless individual’s signature.Marler also alleged that that people in the County Clerk’s office were involved and that the former Harris County Clerk Diane Troutman rather than be involved and possibly face prosecution, that she resigned citing health reasons.Two other men alleged to be involved, State Sen. Borris Miles and Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis, denied the accusations to the Texas Tribune. Miles claimed the allegations were “Republican opposition work.”If there’s actual video evidence like what Project Veritas has or other evidence to support the allegations, this could further flag the ballot harvesting issue and be a real problem for Democrats.2000 Bush v. Gore Lawyer Exposes the ‘Underworld’ That ‘Trades on Ballots and Forgeries’ByConservatives JournalSeptember 29, 2020In light of the Chinese coronavirus pandemic, Democrats have gone all-in on vote-by-mail schemes, ostensibly to protect people from the virus. Yet this shift empowers nefarious criminals who subvert elections by buying and selling ballots and engaging in other forms of voter fraud. Thomas Spencer, a lawyer in the Bush v. Gore (2000) case and vice president of the Lawyers Democracy Fund, warned about the existence of a criminal “underworld” that perpetrates voter fraud.“There’s an underworld out there that trades on ballots and forgeries,” Spencer told PJ Media in an interview Monday. “They pray on old folks or people in very poor communities. It’s a huge problem and it’s one of those subterranean problems where it’s very difficult to find who these people are.”Spencer cited a New York Post article in which a Democratic political operative confessed to engaging in voter fraud for decades. “An election that is swayed by 500 votes, 1,000 votes — it can make a difference,” the tipster, who remained anonymous for fear of prosecution, told The Post. “It could be enough to flip states.” He described situations where operatives — or even nurses — would go from room to room in nursing homes and fill out the ballots for residents.Spencer also recalled the 1997 mayor’s race in Miami, when authorities charged 36 people with crimes involving absentee ballot fraud. “They were part of a well-orchestrated conspiracy to steal the election,” Assistant State Attorney Joe Centorino said at the time. The election results were later reversed, allowing the incumbent to remain return to office after it appeared he had lost the election.“In Miami, we had — and maybe we still have — lots of vote brokers who would go around paying people for ballots,” Spencer told PJ Media.He also recalled a case in Hialeah litigating fraudulent signatures. “We proved that there were hundreds of ballots which were forged,” he said.“We’ve had lots of anecdotal statements made to us that people are buying ballots, absentee ballots, they were paying $50-100 a ballot,” Spencer recalled.He also referenced the bombshell Project Veritas report exposing Liban Mohamed, who boasted about his carload of absentee ballots for Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.).“It’s very difficult to do what Project Veritas did,” Spencer told PJ Media. “It’s very expensive to catch these people. Police agencies and state attorneys, et cetera, really need to have an airtight case before they’re willing to spend thousands and thousands of dollars.”“There is an underworld that’s operating, we really don’t have our hands on it,” the lawyer warned.The Democrats’ strategy“In the states that are controlled by Democrats, they use the firehose of ballots to spread those ballots into as many places as possible without care as to where those ballots are ending up,” Spencer told PJ Media. Democrats are “taking all the guardrails down,” opening up the system to fraud.“I see a real chance that we will have one or two cases going to the Supreme Court because of the way it’s being set up,” he added. “We have to recognize that the Democratic Party strategy has been to create chaos from a legal point of view. In my experience over the last 30-40 years, I’ve seen that the Democrats normally file lawsuits, 30, 60, 90 days out from any election.”“Their philosophy is, ‘Every vote that’s submitted should count even if it’s not a legal vote.’ Whereas our position has always been that every ballot should count if it’s submitted and executed in accordance with the law,” Spencer explained.He zeroed in on Perkins Coie lawyer Marc Elias, who has spearheaded a “four pillars” approach to further mail voting.Elias is fighting to make sure that: the government pays postage for mail-in ballots; ballots postmarked on or before Election Day count, which includes some ballots that arrive a few days after Election Day because not every post office postmarks ballots; every ballot is accepted even if the signature does not match the one on file; and “community organizations” should be allowed to “help collect and deliver voted, sealed ballots,” also known as “ballot harvesting.”Elias’s activism has succeeded in loosening restrictions on signature-matching in Florida, Georgia, and Iowa. It has also furthered ballot harvesting in Arizona. Many states have pushed back the deadline on absentee and mail-in ballots to many days after the election, as many as 9-12 days after November 3.Mail-in voting opens the system to fraud because it disrupts the chain of custody, Tom Spencer argued.“Once the ballot is out of the hands of the voter, the chain of custody is broken,” he explained. While advocates for voting by mail argue that “the Post Office becomes the custodian of that ballot and it goes right to the Elections Department,” Spencer countered that “in Florida, we had ballots which never made it to the Elections Department.”He recalled that “25,000 ballots came in after Election Day” in 2018. “They had been sitting somewhere in somebody’s truck.”Spencer again turned to the Project Veritas video. “When the guy was explaining how they did it, took me right back to cases I’ve litigated in Miami, where they were walking around with wads of cash. Some of these old people in these nursing homes. You give the nursing attendant $50 and you’re in the room with the ballot.”“I wish that the Department of Justice would put up an award for information leading to the arrest of anyone committing vote fraud and I wish they’d advertise that, because I bet they’d get a lot of hits,” he insisted.Thousands Of Ballots In Pennsylvania May Be Missing: OfficialsOctober 31, 2020 Ryan Green Latest News 10 CommentsAuthored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times,Thousands of voters in Butler County, Pennsylvania, said have they never received their ballots…Nearly 40,000 registered voters in the county requested mail-in ballots, but only about 24 percent of them have been returned back to the county so far, authorities said.“At first we thought that maybe it just was a delay in the postal system” due to the high number of requests, Leslie Osche, chair of the Butler County commissioners, was quoted by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette as saying.“And that could still be the case. But nonetheless, when we realized that, we changed our strategy and now have begun to tell folks that if they haven’t received a ballot, they still have multiple options.”“Our main focus—because it’s too late now to worry about this—we need to make sure we get these people their ballots,” Osche added.A U.S. Postal Service (USPS) spokesperson told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette that the agency is “unaware of any significant delays or issues and is in regular contact with the Board of Election as we work to locate and deliver ballots as they are presented to us.” As of Tuesday, voters in Pennsylvania cannot apply for a mail-in or absentee ballot.A local county official, Aaron Sheasley, told CNN Friday that the county has received more than 10,000 phone calls about information related to the ballots that were requested but not received.“Somewhere between the post office and the Pittsburgh sorting facility something happened,” Sheasley told the network.“We don’t know what.” He added:“We haven’t given out any numbers” about the number of missing ballots “because we simply don’t know.”Speaking to CNN, Chuck Bugar, president of the American Postal Workers Union Pittsburgh chapter, said there is no record that suggests the missing ballots in Butler County made it to a Postal Service facility.“There’s no pile of ballots that have been taken from the Butler County election committee that are sitting around,” Bugar said.“There’s no record or indication that they entered the mail stream. There’s paperwork that goes along with it.”Butler County voted for President Donald Trump over Democrat rival Hillary Clinton in 2016 about 66 percent to 29 percent. The county is located north of Pittsburgh and has approximately 150,000 registered voters. In 2020, both Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden have been holding events and rallies, vying to secure the key battleground state with 20 electoral votes.The county told the Post-Gazette that voters can come to the Bureau of Elections and vote in person, provide them with identification, and officials will then give them a new mail-in ballot that a voter can return immediately. The original ballot that was mailed will be voided.They also said that voters can vote at a local polling place in the county. Other alternatives are also provided.via zerohedgeElection Program 'Issue' Tallied Only 2 Votes for GOP Candidate, 33 MI Counties Thought To Be Using the Same SoftwareJason Redmond - AFP / Getty ImagesBy Jared HarrisPublished November 4, 2020 at 3:55pmAn apparent issue with the election infrastructure in one Michigan county resulted in a Republican candidate having a tally of only two votes Wednesday.Now, it’s been revealed that the program at fault could be in use in dozens of other counties across the state.The discrepancy was discovered Wednesday morning in Antrim County, according to Michigan’s Interlochen Public Radio.Triston Cole, a Republican state legislator, cited the fact that Representative Jack Bergman received only two votes, according to county tabulations.“I can guarantee that there were 6 [Bergman votes] in my immediate family alone,” Cole told IPR.Election results posted to the county website have been taken down since the discrepancy was found.“Early this morning, the Antrim County Clerk, Sheryl Guy, became aware of apparently skewed results in the Unofficial Election Result tabulations,” county officials said on their Facebook page.“Since then, the Clerk’s Office has been reviewing the results and the multiple redundancies to search out any possible discrepancies. Staff is currently working with township officials and with Election Source, the company that provides the voting software programs and hardware.”According to WPBN-TV, Guy said the vote totals on printed tabulator tapes and totals counted by the election software did not match. The printed tabulated tapes from each precinct will be counted manually as a result.According to KXXV-TV anchor Joe Gumm, the Antrim County Clerk’s Office is now in the process of reviewing over 16,000 ballots cast in the county.Even worse for the integrity of elections in Michigan, the program used to conduct voting in Antrim County is reportedly being used in 33 other counties across the state.“The irregularities reported this morning are incredibly troubling, especially given how close the election results are in Michigan,” Michigan Republican Party Chair Laura Cox told WPBN-TV.“At this point, it is unclear whether or not these issues were caused by incompetence or corruption, but the fact that they exist is of great concern, and the Michigan Republican Party will spare no expense to expose the truth of what happened in yesterday’s election.”James O’Keefe and Project Veritas released a new video with some rather disturbing allegations.A USPS worker in Michigan came forward to say that he was given a directive to change dates on mail so ballots could be collected.If the allegations are true, Michigan is currently adding illegal ballots to its totals.The AllegationIn the state of Michigan, ballots have to be postmarked by election day in order to be counted.The postal worker that came to O’Keefe is claiming ballots received on Nov. 4 were being postmarked for Nov. 3 so they could be considered valid ballots…BREAKING: Michigan @USPS Whistleblower Details Directive From Superiors: Back-Date Late Mail-In-Ballots As Received November 3rd, 2020 So They Are Accepted “Separate them from standard letter mail so they can hand stamp them with YESTERDAY'S DATE & put them through" #MailFraudThis is obviously a very concerning allegation and something that must be looked into.Lawsuits Piling UpThe Trump campaign is already working overtime filing complaints on various fronts in virtually every battleground state that was called late or still remains open.Suits have been or will be filed in Nevada, Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and North Carolina.The suits range from not being able to have oversight on the election to possible illegal ballots being counted.We honestly have no idea how all this will play out, but in some cases, local Democrats working on the election have opened the door to these suits.For instance, in PA, election observers were being prevented access to polling stations.Philadelphia, in particular, has a long history of election integrity issues, so if they truly have nothing to hide, why all the secrecy?Late-night ballot dumps in both Wisconsin and Michigan, where more than 100k votes for ONLY Joe Biden that were added to the totals also has a lot of people asking a lot of questions.At this time, we have yet to see any comment or explanation by either state regarding those ballots.With Nevada now saying it will not have votes counted until Friday or Saturday, Republicans, at the very least, know Joe Biden is unlikely to be declared the official winner until that state goes final.That gives Trump at least 24 hours to make headway in Arizona and to continue to fight these battles regarding possible illegal ballots being counted.USPS Worker ARRESTED, Caught Trying to Cross the Border With BallotsByAnastasia BousheeNovember 6, 2020An upstate New York USPS employee was arrested on Tuesday trying to cross the United States-Canada border with over 800 pieces of mail inside his trunk, including several absentee ballots.The Buffalo, NY mailman, who was caught with his trunk full of hundreds of envelopes and other undelivered mail, claimed he had ended up on the bridge between the two countries by accident, according to the Buffalo News.Brandon Wilson, 27, was found by Customs and Border Protection to have a huge bin of mail spanning several zip codes in his vehicle. Among the undelivered mail were three absentee ballots from the Erie County Board of Elections, according to a criminal complaint filed in federal court.Wilson told CBP agents that he was in the wrong lane on I-190 and accidentally ended up on the bridge. When pressed, Wilson claimed that the mail belonged to him and his mother, but could not explain the mail addressed to other people.In a subsequent interview with the Postal Service Office of the Inspector General, Wilson admitted that he had been taking mail from his delivery route and putting it in his car.“Beginning in September 2020, Wilson estimated he placed mail from his delivery routes into the trunk of his vehicle on more than four but less than 10 instances after returning to the post office from his assigned route,” special agent Brendan M. Boone wrote in a report.“Wilson intended to whittle down the amount of mail in the trunk of his vehicle by placing a small amount of the mail into USPS missort containers in the morning before his shift began. Wilson last reintroduced mailings into the mail stream in this fashion approximately three weeks prior [to] the date of the interview,” Boone continued.The mail found in his trunk at the U.S.-Canada border included 106 political mailings, 220 first-class mailings and 484 standard mailings. Wilson denied knowing that he was in possession of the absentee ballots.According to court documents, Wilson has been charged with delaying or destroying mail. He faces five years in prison and a $250,000 fine if convicted.Michigan is back in play after software ‘glitch’ correction returns votes to President TrumpJust as mainstream media and Democrats gleefully prepared to announce a Biden win, some of the shenanigans we've seen throughout this election was reversed in Michigan.by Blaine TraberNovember 6, 2020in Cybersecurity, Democrats, Election 2020, News, Republicans, State and Local, White HouseStop the presses. The fat lady hasn’t sung yet. Michigan appears to be back in play as a supposed “software glitch” has been corrected, reversing over 5,500 votes from Joe Biden to President Trump. This “glitch” has been found in 47 other counties, delivering hope that Michigan may, indeed, be red after all.According to Just The News:An election-software glitch in Michigan’s Antrim County that had incorrectly directed votes Democratic presidential candidate to Joe Biden was fixed Friday, putting thousands of vote correctly into President Trump’s totals.The software had reportedly caused a significant number of votes to be allotted to Biden in a county that has for years been reliably red. In the presumed final count, Biden had originally led in the county by roughly 3,000 votes. Revised totals show that Trump won the county by around 2,500.Addressing the alleged software glitch, Michigan GOP Chairwoman Laura Cox said Friday during a press conference that “47 counties [in Michigan] use this same software in the same capacity.”It is unknown whether this same glitch reversal will help John James, the Republican Senate candidate who appeared to win only to have that win reversed with late “surfaced” voting for his opponent. The fate of the Senate may hang in the balance as what appeared to be a safe GOP majority has inched closer to being deadlocked or even switching to Democrat control.In this crazy election cycle, we can’t take anything for granted until the end. Michigan was dead in the water for Democrats, but there is now strong hope that it can be rightly called soon for President Trump.GOP Claims Software Error Switched 6,000 Republican Votes to Democrat, Used in 47 Michigan CountiesBY JACK PHILLIPSNovember 6, 2020 Updated: November 7, 2020Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel and other GOP officials said the fight over the presidential election isn’t over, saying that 47 counties in Michigan may have used software that was detected to have allocated votes to Democrat Joe Biden instead of President Donald Trump in one county.“In Antrim County, ballots were counted for Democrats that were meant for Republicans causing a 6,000-vote swing against our candidates,” Michigan GOP Chairwoman Laura Cox said in a news conference Friday. “The county clerk came forward and said tabulating software glitched and caused a miscalculation of the votes.”Cox added: “Since then, we have now discovered that 47 counties use this same software in the same capacity. Antrim County had to hand count all of the ballots, and these counties that use this software needs to closely examine their results for similar discrepancies.”A number of news outlets, including The Associated Press and Decision Desk, have declared Michigan for Democratic nominee Joe Biden. Biden is currently leading Trump by about 146,000 votes.After a discrepancy was found in Antrim County, election officials reviews the ballots. Updated results showed Trump winning the county.In one instance in Oakland County, a computer error led officials to declare Democrat Melanie Hartman the winner before they reversed it and declared incumbent Adam Kochenderfer, a Republican, the winner of the Oakland County’s 15th county commission District, the Detroit Free Press reported.“I thought that was that,” Kochenderfer said. “Those were the results, and I said I would not seek a recount.”Oakland County Director of Elections Joe Rozell told the paper that the error was due to a computer issue at a city clerk’s office. He didn’t elaborate on the issue or if it was the same software used in Antrim County.“A computer issue in Rochester Hills caused them to send us results for seven precincts as both precinct votes and absentee votes. They should only have been sent to us as absentee votes,” Rozell said.Poll workers tabulate absentee ballots at the TCF Center during Election Day in Detroit, Mich., Nov. 3, 2020. (Rebecca Cook/Reuters)The RNC has deployed legal teams to Michigan. No lawsuit has yet to be announced over the software.“We will not give up on this process until every last issue has been resolved,” McDaniel said in the news conference.Cox and McDaniel also alleged that there were irregularities in Detroit, asserting that Republican poll-watchers were denied access to the vote-counting process in some places.The Michigan Board of Elections has not yet responded to a request for comment about Cox’s claims.Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat, called the claims outlined in the GOP press conference false.“Michigan’s elections were conducted fairly, effectively and transparently and are an accurate reflection of the will of Michigan voters,” she said in a statement, adding that skewed results in Antrim County were the result of a human error, not a software error, and that there were always challengers from both parties in the room while ballots were being counted in Detroit.The Michigan Democratic Party also responded to the claims of misconduct.“The clerks in Michigan have done an incredible job this, and every election cycle, despite little to no support from the Republican-controlled legislature,” said Party Chair Lavora Barnes to MLive. “We join local clerks in calling for reforms to the election system that will decrease legislative barriers and provide clerks additional resources to allow them to do their jobs more efficiently and effectively.”USPS FINDING EVEN MORE BALLOTS THAT WERE SWEPT UNDER THE RUG!STAFF NOVEMBER 6, 2020IF YOU THINK THAT THERE ISN’T SOMETHING FUNNY GOING ON WITH THE BALLOTS RIGHT NOW YOU ARE JUST NOT PAYING ATTENTION.What they are doing is halfway under the radar so that people that aren’t looking closely won’t see it.However, if you try to look at it with even a little bit of a trained eye you can see there is something not right going on with the counting.The U.S. Postal Service said it has unearthed more than 1,700 mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania and more than 500 additional mail-in ballots in North Carolina following court-ordered sweeps of its facilities in the battleground states.So far, the race between President Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden remains too close for major news outlets to call, but it leans increasingly in Biden’s favor as more mail-in votes are counted.The article goes on to state the following:In a court filing early Friday morning, the Justice Department revealed that USPS plant managers in Greensboro, Mid-Carolinas, Central Pennsylvania, Western Pennsylvania, and the Philadelphia metropolitan area had found more mailed in votes, including 539 total in North Carolina, where Trump currently leads, and 1,703 in Pennsylvania, including 297 and 1,076 respectively from the Democratic strongholds of Pittsburgh and Philadelphia. The late-received votes in Pennsylvania may end up being challenged by Republicans. Decision Desk HQ, a nonpartisan election analysis firm, projected that Biden would defeat Trump in Pennsylvania, and thus win the presidency, but news outlets contend that it remains too close to call. As mail-in and absentee ballots were counted over the past couple of days, Trump’s sizable lead in the state slipped away, and Biden took the lead in unofficial counts Friday morning. The Trump campaign, which has mounted a flurry of legal challenges in the state, quickly issued a statement saying the election is “not over.”In another incident, a U.S. postal worker has been arrested near the Canadian border, with over 800 pieces of undelivered mail in the trunk of his car, including some ballots.There have been multiple allegations involving postal workers this week, with whistleblowers coming forward saying that ballots received after Election Day were held back and postmarked for Nov. 3 to indicate they came in on Election Day.Attorney Sidney Powell Drops Massive Bomb: “We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots That Miraculously Only Have a Vote For Joe Biden”By USA First Reporting | November 9, 2020In addition we are looking at electronic ballot systems which may have changed “3 percent of the vote.”Powell claims that she has “identified over 450,000 ballots that miraculously only have a vote for Joe Biden on them and no other candidate.”MAell said on Fox News. “To manufacture votes for Joe Biden. They’ve done it in every way imaginable, from having dead people vote in record numbers, to absolutely fraudulently creating ballots that exist only for voting for Biden. We’ve identified over 450,000 ballots that miraculously only have a vote for Joe Biden on them and no other candidate. If you look at Florida where things were done right you can see that that is how the rest of the country should have gone. But they also used an algorithm to calculate the number of votes they would need to flip. And they used computers to flip those votes from Trump to Biden and from other Republican candidates to their competitors also.”WATCH:This isn’t the only recent bomb that Powell has dropped. During a bombshell interview with Fox Business host Lou Dobbs, Powell called for an investigation into electronic ballot systems which may have changed “3 percent of the vote.”“I think they need to investigate the likelihood that 3 percent of the vote changed [due to] preelection ballots collected digitally by using the Hammer and Scorecard programs,” she said during the interview.“I think Hammer and Scorecard were used by Democratic operatives who had access through government access points,” she added. “They used them to illegally change votes. It’s been used against other countries. It’s just been changed recently [to be used] against our own citizens.”For all States with any form of VOTE BY MAI: Forensic recount.Starting with every vote in Pennsylvania, each vote should be forensically investigated, at a minimum, to determine the following:Is the vote from a LIVE, IN STATE, REGISTERED VOTER? If not, throw it out.Does the ballot have a signature that matches the voter registration card? If not, throw it out.Is the vote the ONLY vote from an IN STATE, REGISTERED VOTER? If not, throw out ALL votes from that voter as the voter violated Federal Election Laws. Then arrest that voter and prosecute him or her for voter fraud.Was the vote received or postmarked by November 3, 2020. If not, throw it out.Was the vote received at the voter polling station by 8pm on November 3, postmarked or not? If not, throw it out.Was the vote tampered with, illegible, or marked in any manner that does not demonstrate a clear vote for either candidate? If so, throw it out.Did the vote as marked, actually record for the proper candidate when entered in the electronic scanner? If not, take a vote away from the candidate who received the improper credit and credit the proper candidate.ALL votes received AFTER 8pm on November 3 in "dumps" must be sourced back to the original location that they came from and individuals involved in delivering the "dumps" must be questioned intensely to determine who was behind the dumping of votes in the wee hours of the morning on November 4 and beyond. Anyone involved in the fraudulent dumping should be arrested and prosecuted.EVERY polling worker in every voter precinct of the key states in this election should be interviewed under immunity to give them an opportunity to come forward and disclose any voter fraud they witnessed or were instructed to perform by their supervisors or Democratic operatives.EVERY postal worker in the state, should be given the opportunity under immunity to come forward and disclose any voter fraud they witnessed or were instructed to perform by their supervisors or Democratic operatives.