Motion To Reinstate Chapter 7 Case: Fill & Download for Free

Donald Trump Fast Facts(CNN)Here's a look at the life of Donald Trump, the 45th president of the United States.Personal:Birth date: June 14, 1946Birth place: New York, New YorkBirth name: Donald John TrumpFather: Fred Trump, real estate developerMother: Mary (Macleod) TrumpMarriages: Melania (Knauss) Trump (January 22, 2005-present); Marla (Maples) Trump (December 1993-June 1999, divorced); Ivana (Zelnicek) Trump (1977-1990, divorced)Children: with Melania Trump: Barron, March 20, 2006; with Marla Maples: Tiffany, October 13, 1993; with Ivana Trump: Eric, 1984; Ivanka, October 30, 1981; Donald Jr., December 31, 1977Education: Attended Fordham University; University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School of Finance, B.S. in Economics, 1968Photos: Donald Trump's riseOther Facts:As Trump evolved from real estate developer to reality television star, he turned his name into a brand. Licensed Trump products have included board games, steaks, cologne, vodka, furniture and menswear.He has portrayed himself in cameo appearances in movies and on television, including "Zoolander," "Sex and the City" and "Home Alone 2: Lost in New York."Trump's slogan, "Make America Great Again," was first used by Ronald Reagan while he was running against President Jimmy Carter.For details on investigations into alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 election, visit 2016 Presidential Election Investigation Fast Facts.For updates on Trump administration departures and firings, visit Who has left Trump's administration and orbit.Timeline:1970s - After college, works with his father on apartment complexes in Queens and Brooklyn, New York.1973 - Trump and his father are named in a Justice Department lawsuit alleging Trump property managers violated the Fair Housing Act by turning away potential African-American tenants. The Trumps deny the company discriminates and file a $100 million countersuit, which is later dismissed. The case is settled in 1975, and the Trumps agree to provide weekly lists of vacancies to black community organizations.1976 - Trump and his father partner with the Hyatt Corporation, purchasing the Commodore Hotel, an aging midtown Manhattan property. The building is revamped and opens four years later as the Grand Hyatt Hotel. The project kickstarts Trump's career as a Manhattan developer.1983-1990 - He builds/purchases multiple properties in New York City, including Trump Tower and the Plaza Hotel, and also opens casinos in Atlantic City, New Jersey, including the Trump Taj Mahal and the Trump Plaza. Trump buys the New Jersey Generals football team, part of the United States Football League, which folds after three seasons.1985 - Purchases Mar-a-Lago, an oceanfront estate in Palm Beach, Florida. It is renovated and opens as a private club in 1995.1987 - Trump's first book, "Trump: The Art of the Deal," is published and becomes a bestseller. The Donald J. Trump Foundation is established in order to donate a portion of profits from book sales to charities.1990 - Nearly $1 billion in personal debt, Trump reaches an agreement with bankers allowing him to avoid declaring personal bankruptcy.1991 - The Trump Taj Mahal files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.1992 - The Trump Plaza and the Trump Castle casinos file for bankruptcy.1996 - Buys out and becomes executive producer of the Miss Universe, Miss USA and Miss Teen USA pageants.October 7, 1999 - Tells CNN's Larry King that he is going to form a presidential exploratory committee and wants to challenge Pat Buchanan for the Reform Party nomination.February 14, 2000 - Says that he is abandoning his bid for the presidency, blaming discord within the Reform Party.January 2004 - "The Apprentice," a reality show featuring aspiring entrepreneurs competing for Trump's approval, premieres on NBC.November 21, 2004 - Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Inc. files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.2005 - Establishes Trump University, which offers seminars in real estate investment.February 13, 2009 - Announces his resignation from his position as chairman of Trump Entertainment Resorts. Days later, the company files for bankruptcy protection.March 17, 2011 - During an interview on ABC's "Good Morning America," Trump questions whether President Barack Obama was born in the United States.June 16, 2015 - Announces that he is running for president during a speech at Trump Tower. He pledges to implement policies that will boost the economy and says he will get tough on immigration. "When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best...They're sending people who have lots of problems," Trump says. "They're bringing drugs, they're bringing crime, they're rapists, and some, I assume, are good people."June 28, 2015 - Says he's giving up the TV show "The Apprentice" to run for president.June 29, 2015 - NBCUniversal says it is cutting its business ties to Trump and won't air the Miss USA and Miss Universe pageants because of "derogatory statements by Donald Trump regarding immigrants."July 8, 2015 - In an interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper, Trump says he "can't guarantee" all of his employees have legal status in the United States. This is in response to questions about a Washington Post report about undocumented immigrants working at the Old Post Office construction site in Washington, which Trump is converting into a hotel.July 22, 2015 - Trump's financial disclosure report is made public by the Federal Election Commission.August 6, 2015 - During the first 2016 Republican debate, Trump is questioned about a third party candidacy, his attitude towards women and his history of donating money to Democratic politicians. He tells moderator Megyn Kelly of Fox News he feels he is being mistreated.August 7, 2015 - The controversy continues, as Trump tells CNN's Don Lemon that Kelly was singling him out for attack, "You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever."September 11, 2015 - Trump announces he has purchased NBC's half of the Miss Universe Organization, which organizes the annual Miss USA and Miss Universe pageants.December 7, 2015 - Trump's campaign puts out a press release calling for a "complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on."May 26, 2016 - Secures enough delegates to clinch the Republican Party nomination.July 16, 2016 - Introduces Indiana Governor Mike Pence as his running mate.July 19, 2016 - Becomes the Republican Party nominee for president.September 13, 2016 - During an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman says his office is investigating Trump's charitable foundation "to make sure it's complying with the laws governing charities in New York."October 1, 2016 - The New York Times reports Trump declared a $916 million loss in 1995 which could have allowed him to legally skip paying federal income taxes for years. The report is based on a financial document mailed to the newspaper by an anonymous source.October 7, 2016 - Unaired footage from 2005 surfaces of Trump talking about trying to have sex with a married woman and being able to grope women. In footage obtained by The Washington Post, Trump is heard off-camera discussing women in vulgar terms during the taping of a segment for "Access Hollywood." In a taped response, Trump declares, "I said it, I was wrong and I apologize."October 9, 2016 - During the second presidential debate, CNN's Cooper asks Trump about his descriptions of groping and kissing women without their consent in the "Access Hollywood" footage. Trump denies that he has ever engaged in such behavior and declares the comments were "locker room talk." After the debate, 11 women step forward to claim that they were sexually harassed or sexually assaulted by the real estate developer. Trump says the stories aren't true.November 8, 2016 - Is elected president of the United States. Trump will be the first president who has never held elected office, a top government post or a military rank.November 18, 2016 - Trump agrees to pay $25 million to settle three lawsuits against Trump University. The deal keeps the President-elect from having to testify in a trial in San Diego that was set to begin November 28. The settlement ends a suit brought by Schneiderman, as well as two class action suits in California. About 6,000 former students are covered by the settlement.December 24, 2016 - Trump says he will dissolve the Donald J. Trump Foundation "to avoid even the appearance of any conflict with my role as President." A spokeswoman for the New York Attorney General's Office says that the foundation cannot legally close until investigators conclude their probe of the charity.January 10, 2017 - CNN reports that intelligence officials briefed Trump on a dossier that contains allegations about his campaign's ties to Russia and unverified claims about his personal life. The author of the dossier is a former British spy who was hired by a research firm that had been funded by both political parties to conduct opposition research on Trump.January 20, 2017 - Takes the oath of office from Chief Justice John Roberts during an inauguration ceremony at the Capitol and delivers an inaugural address centering on the populist themes that fueled his candidacy.January 23, 2017 - Trump signs an executive action withdrawing the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a 12-nation trade deal negotiated by the Obama administration and awaiting congressional approval.January 27, 2017 - Trump signs an executive order halting all refugee arrivals for 120 days and banning travel to the United States from seven Muslim-majority countries for 90 days. Additionally, refugees from Syria are barred indefinitely from entering the United States. The order is challenged in court.February 13, 2017 - Trump's national security adviser, Michael Flynn, resigns amid accusations he lied about his communications with Russian ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak. Flynn later pleads guilty to lying to the FBI.February 28, 2017 - Nominates Neil Gorsuch to replace late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.March 4, 2017 - Alleges on Twitter, without offering evidence, that Obama wiretapped his phones ahead of the 2016 election. "Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my 'wires tapped' in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"March 16, 2017 - The Trump administration releases its budget blueprint, with increases in funding for the military and cuts for agencies including the State Department, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Agriculture.May 3, 2017 - FBI Director James Comey confirms that there is an ongoing investigation into ties between the Trump campaign and Russia during a hearing on Capitol Hill. Less than a week later, Trump fires Comey, citing a DOJ memo critical of the way he handled the investigation into Clinton's emails.May 2017 - Shortly after Trump fired Comey, the FBI opens an investigation into whether Trump "had been working on behalf of Russia against American interests," citing former law enforcement officials and others the paper said were familiar with the probe.May 17, 2017 - Former FBI Director Robert Mueller is appointed as special counsel to lead the probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, including potential collusion between Trump campaign associates and Russian officials. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein makes the appointment because Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself in March from investigations into Trump's campaign.May 19, 2017 - Departs on his first foreign trip as president. The nine-day, five-country trip includes stops in Saudi Arabia, Israel, the Vatican, a NATO summit in Brussels and a G7 summit in Sicily.June 1, 2017 - Trump proclaims that the United States is withdrawing from the Paris climate accord but adds that he is open to renegotiating aspects of the environmental agreement, which was signed by 175 countries in 2016.July 7, 2017 - Meets Russian President Vladimir Putin in person for the first time, on the sidelines of the G20 meeting in Hamburg, Germany.August 8, 2017 - In response to nuclear threats from North Korea, Trump warns that Pyongyang will "face fire and fury like the world has never seen." Soon after Trump's comments, North Korea issues a statement saying it is "examining the operational plan" to strike areas around the US territory of Guam.August 15, 2017 - After a violent clash between neo-Nazi activists and counterprotesters leaves one dead in Charlottesville, Virginia, Trump holds an impromptu press conference in the lobby of Trump Tower and declares that there were "fine people" on both sides.August 25, 2017 - Trump's first pardon is granted to former Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio, who was convicted of criminal contempt for disregarding a court order in a racial-profiling case. Trump did not consult with lawyers at the Justice Department before announcing his decision.September 5, 2017 - The Trump administration announces that it is ending the DACA program, introduced by Obama to protect nearly 800,000 undocumented immigrants brought to the United States as children. Trump calls on Congress to introduce legislation that will prevent DACA recipients from being deported. Multiple lawsuits are filed opposing the policy in federal courts and judges delay the end of the program, asking the government to submit filings justifying the cancellation of DACA.September 19, 2017 - In a speech at the United Nations General Assembly, Trump refers to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un as "Rocket Man" and warns that the United States will "totally destroy North Korea" if forced to defend itself or its allies.September 24, 2017 - The Trump administration unveils a third version of the travel ban, placing restrictions on travel by certain foreigners from Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen. (Chad is later removed after meeting security requirements.) One day before the revised ban is set to take effect, it is blocked nationwide by a federal judge in Hawaii. A judge in Maryland issues a similar ruling.December 4, 2017 - The Supreme Court rules that the revised travel ban can take effect pending appeals.December 6, 2017 - Trump recognizes Jerusalem as Israel's capital and announces plans to relocate the US Embassy there.January 11, 2018 - During a White House meeting on immigration reform, Trump reportedly refers to Haiti and African nations as "shithole countries." He reportedly says that the United States should get more people from countries like Norway.January 12, 2018 - The Wall Street Journal reports that Trump had an alleged affair with a porn star named Stephanie Clifford, aka Stormy Daniels. The newspaper states that Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen, arranged a $130,000 payment for a nondisclosure agreement weeks before Election Day in 2016. Cohen denies that Trump had a relationship with Clifford.March 13, 2018 - Trump announces in a tweet that he has fired Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and will nominate CIA Director Mike Pompeo as Tillerson's replacement.March 20, 2018 - A New York Supreme Court judge rules that a defamation lawsuit against Trump can move forward, ruling against a July 2017 motion to dismiss filed by Trump's lawyers. The lawsuit, filed by Summer Zervos, a former "Apprentice" contestant, is related to sexual assault allegations.March 23, 2018 - The White House announces that it is adopting a policy, first proposed by Trump via tweet in July 2017, banning most transgender individuals from serving in the military.April 9, 2018 - The FBI raids Cohen's office, home and a hotel room where he'd been staying while his house was renovated. The raid is related to a federal investigation of possible fraud and campaign finance violations.April 13, 2018 - Trump authorizes joint military strikes in Syria with the UK and France after reports the government used chemical weapons on civilians in Douma.May 7, 2018 - The Trump administration announces a "zero tolerance" policy for illegal border crossings. Sessions says that individuals who violate immigration law will be criminally prosecuted and warns that parents could be separated from children.May 8, 2018 - Trump announces that the United States is withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal. "This was a horrible one-sided deal that should have never, ever been made," he says in remarks that, at times, misrepresent the international agreement's provisions.May 31, 2018 - The Trump administration announces it is imposing tariffs on steel and aluminum imported from allies Canada, Mexico and the European Union.June 8-9, 2018 - Before leaving for the G7 summit in Quebec City, Trump tells reporters that Russia should be reinstated in the group. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 led to Russia's suspension. After leaving the summit, Trump tweets that he will not endorse the traditional G7 communique issued at the end of the meeting. The President singles out Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for making "false statements" at a news conference.June 12, 2018 - Trump meets Kim in person for the first time during a summit in Singapore. They sign a four-point statement that broadly outlines the countries' commitment to a peace process. The statement contains a pledge by North Korea to "work towards" complete denuclearization but the agreement does not detail how the international community will verify that Kim is ending his nuclear program.June 14, 2018 - The New York attorney general sues the Trump Foundation, alleging that the nonprofit run by Trump and his three eldest children violated state and federal charity law.June 26, 2018 - The Supreme Court upholds the Trump administration's travel ban in a 5-4 ruling along party lines.July 16, 2018 - During a joint news conference with Putin in Helsinki, Trump declines to endorse the US government's assessment that Russia interfered in the election, saying he doesn't "see any reason why" Russia would be responsible. The next day, Trump clarifies his remark, "The sentence should have been, 'I don't see any reason why it wouldn't be Russia." He says he accepts the intelligence community's conclusion that Russia meddled in the election but adds, "It could be other people also."August 21, 2018 - Cohen pleads guilty to eight federal charges, including two campaign finance violations. In court, he says that he orchestrated payments to silence women "in coordination and at the direction of a candidate for federal office." On the same day, Trump's former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort is convicted on eight counts of federal financial crimes. On December 12 Cohen is sentenced to three years in prison.September 5, 2018 - The New York Times publishes an op-ed by an anonymous Trump administration official who claims that there is an ongoing effort to thwart the president's worst impulses. Trump says the person who wrote the piece is "gutless."September 11, 2018 - Bob Woodward's book "Fear: Trump in the White House" is published. Several administration officials say that they are misquoted in the book.November 20, 2018 - Releases a statement backing Saudi Arabia in the wake of the murder of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi, a Virginia resident, killed in October at a Saudi consulate in Turkey. Khashoggi was a frequent critic of the Saudi regime. The Saudis initially denied any knowledge of his death, but then later said a group of rogue operators were responsible for his killing. US officials have speculated that such a mission, including the 15 men sent from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to murder him, could not have been carried out without the authorization of Saudi leader Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.December 18, 2018 - The Donald J. Trump Foundation agrees to dissolve according to a document filed in Manhattan Supreme Court. The agreement allows the New York attorney general's office to review the recipients of the charity's assets.December 19, 2018 - Trump declares that the US has defeated ISIS and orders a "full" and "rapid" withdrawal of US military from Syria.December 22, 2018 - The longest partial government shutdown in US history begins after Trump demands lawmakers allocate $5.7 billion in funding for a border wall before agreeing to sign a federal funding package.January 16, 2019 - After nearly two years of Trump administration officials denying that anyone involved in his campaign colluded with the Russians to help his candidacy, Trump lawyer and former New York City mayor, Rudy Giuliani, says "I never said there was no collusion between the campaign, or people in the campaign. I said the President of the United States. There is not a single bit of evidence the President of the United States committed the only crime you can commit here, conspiring with the Russians to hack the DNC."January 25, 2019 - The government shutdown ends when Trump signs a short-term spending measure, providing three weeks of stopgap funding while lawmakers work on a border security compromise. The bill does not include any wall funding.February 15, 2019 - Trump declares a national emergency to allocate funds to build a wall on the border with Mexico. During the announcement, the president says he expects the declaration to be challenged in court. The same day, Trump signs a border security measure negotiated by Congress, with $1.375 billion set aside for barriers, averting another government shutdown.February 18, 2019 - Attorneys general from 16 states file a lawsuit in federal court challenging Trump's emergency declaration.February 28, 2019 - Trump's summit with Kim ends with no joint agreement after Kim insists all US sanctions on North Korea be lifted. On the same day, Trump's former attorney Cohen testifies before the House Oversight Committee presenting an extensive set of Trump's possible criminal liabilities.

Here’s a law that was created entirely in order to assume the equity of my condo. This is a chapter of a book that was going to usher a new age for humanity…. thankfully I sobered up and realized I’d be killed for it….8.5 Jon in the BoxHow to Get a City to WorkJon Bergling, Building Code Compliance Specialist Supervisor for the City ofBoulder, says that flooring is purely cosmetics. There are no building codes for flooring. Sorry, he can't help.I spoke before the Boulder City Council. If they were aware that Jon Bergling was fleecing me they didn't offer any correction. In fact, they offered absolutely nothing. It was not an election year. They remained silent waiting for me to sit down.That evening they busied themselves with the application of a Developer. The City staff came back stating that the development is unsustainable. There is no existing infrastructure to support it. It would cause problems in terms of parking, traffic, water, sewer and in all other aspects of living together. What should have been a speedy "No" vote became an elongated and twisted ordeal.Jen Burton was a new arrival. She appeared extremely worried as she brought up what was apparently a problem: that should the Council fail to authorize this development then the developer may not make a second proposition for this City! A second Councilman, an attorney, I suspect, went on tandem withBurton. It was hard for me to understand what his arguments were, as he was slightly more sophisticated thenBurton, and likely trained in "Attorney Speak."The three natives embarked on a muted, hard to follow discussion. Applebeum suggested that the City requires smaller condos, not the luxurious condos that we always end up with. "These discussions will keep ending up in the same spot each time," he worried.At this pointBurtonemployed a face typically reserved for USPS employees as they attempt sabotage waiting lines. It was a mixture of stupidity and bewilderment. "I'm going to vote Yes," she stated with devoted determination.That evening the Council was talking before a full room. The downstairs lobby streamed the meeting to a room packed with residents. Most of them have come to dissuade the Council from their reluctance to authorize Co-op developments that are large enough to deliver a financially viable housing solution for residents. All were highly educated. Most have been dismayed with the Council for a long time, accusing it of selling out the City and over-developing it.I believe it was at this point that Councilwoman Morzel offered that the same developer has sent her checks too, but that she had returned them all to him. I suspect that she was talking about undisclosed campaign "donations." Our legislators and Executives have relieved themselves from the need disclose the sources of their campaign contributions.The year before Morzel held an e-Town event to celebrate the initiation of her new composting program for the city. We enjoyed gourmet appetizers, the type of food Council members commonly eat at meetings. We then divided into groups to ask questions regarding the new composting regulations. It became almost instantly apparent that the regulations were half-baked and not well-thought-through. They were never implemented by the City.We then proceeded to an evening of empty gestures to green living topped by a raffle. We each got two pop-bottle lids with a number on them. We put one in the raffle bucket, or so we thought, and we kept one. When all of Morzel's office members have already gotten one ruffle gift our MC realized that her bucket was now empty. She suggested putting the lids back in the bucket and drawing second prizes for everyone. That's when residents realized they never actually participated in the ruffle.Morzel did keep her position after the elections. But perhaps she felt she had hit some type of ceiling in terms of conning the public. Perhaps something else prompted her to disassociate herself fromBurton's shamefully lame con-skills. Morzel suggested that she was going to vote "No." In the end the three old-timers voted No to the unwanted development.(NOTE TO EDITOR: A DESCERNING READER SHOULD BE ABLE TO READ THE FOLLOWING CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE LINES:BURTON: THESE WERE SOME FAT CAMPAIGN CHECKS. IF WE DON'T VOTE YES WE MIGHT NOT GET A SECOND OFFER LIKE THAT AGAIN.APPLEABEUM: I TRIED. THEY ARE GIVING ME FUNNY LOOKS.MORZEL: WE CAN KEEP THE CHECKS WE GOT FOR NOW. IT IS MORE IMPORTANT TO STAY IN POWER. LET'S DO A NO VOTE.)People who Need Other PeopleIt was over a year later when an architect friend of mine suggested that while it was true that residents don't have to apply for licenses each time they replace their flooring, the City ofBoulderdoes follow applicable International Building Codes which Jon should have enforced in my case. The City also revises codes to adapt them toBoulderso there would never be any reason not to resolve my ordeal.I now realized that Jon's communication style was meant to find out what I do or don't know before he selects a response. I was left feeling uneasy and under-informed. I realized that after first contacting Jon by phone, we had played phone-tag for three weeks. It was not until, in one of my many messages, I mentioned that I had spoken to Jen from Rental Licensing. I mentioned that Jen said that Jon would come to conduct an inspection and that he was going to open a ticket for me and make everything right again. It was only then that Jon spoke to me on the phone, then showed up for the inspection.I went back to the City and learned that, without my knowledge Jon had indeed opened and closed a "Thermal" case against the Schuberts. He likely demanded that the Schuberts to be able to heat up their home to 63 degrees. He may have done so to keep Jen from Rental Licensing in the dark about his dealings. I found it comforting to think that perhaps Jon had to put much effort into keeping other City employees unaware of his adamant resistance to work. The ticket mentioned single layer of carpeting - likely the carpeting that Emilia kept for a couple of days.I asked Jen Ross from Jon's office to open a case for Sound Transmission between Units. I now feel that perhaps I need at least three different tickets: Sound Transmission between Units to prevent hardwood flooring; Thermal Transmission between Units to reinstate the insulation and underlayment; and Odor Transmission between Units just to make sure they have no excuses.Jen Ross said that Sound Transmission between Units had to do with loud parties. I should call the police, not the City. She will not open any tickets for me.I went back to the City and this time I sat in the conference room with LaDonna Eubanks, a Supervisor, while Bryan Holms, Senior Planer/Zoning Administrator, sat next to me and took notes. LaDonna suggested that I make an Open Records Request for my building plans. We could look at them together to determine whether any code violations occured.Bryanwrote down two emails that I could use. One was for the Planning and Development Services, the other for General City of Boulder Records. I wrote Planning and Development first.An unidentified team member answered that they have searched all building plans from 1983 and mine are not available. Jen Ross insisted that Jon Bergling had already looked at these non-existent plans and had already determined that there are no Building Code Violations. This felt like a strong, coordinated opposition to me. I noticed that when I search for my plat plans at the County, I search by developer or development name, not by year. My plat plans and building plans are both from 1984. Central Records confirmed the same; however I didn't realize that I should write them next. Instead I called Eubanks for help correcting the Planning and Development Services rebelion.Both Eubanks and her assistant told me that there were periods when the City was not required to keep building plans on record. I was not sure what to believe anymore. She said that it was my responsibility to supply the City with these plans. Somebody has them, she assured me, perhaps the developer.I felt that all that was required was to stand in my unit, experience the hot air coming from above and smell the corpse-like odors accompanied by deodorizers. Eubanks said that the only way to assert a Building Code Violation was to remove the flooring and she was not going to order that. Perhaps Eubanks felt that she needed to look at the plans to see how the insulation was arranged and whether there would be any reason to discard of it when gluing down engineered hardwood directly on my ceiling joists. She said that Jon Bergling had already conducted that physical inspection and did not find any Building Code Violations. She wouldn't help and suggested that I consult with an attorney.The November 7, 2017 election day was coming and I was not looking forward for another encounter with a corrupt Voting Office. Each time I would go to vote I would ask to vote electronically. I didn't trust them to count other ballots. Each time, the team would deny having a DVR; then they would deny knowing how to operate the DVR; then they would state that I'm not smart enough to operate the DVR; then they would say that Internet was down. In the end, they let me use the DVR to vote each time.The papers discussed similar behavior at the DNS - pushing Bernie Sanders away and putting forward Hillary Clinton, otherwise known as The Clintonite. The papers predicted that such shameless corruption could push voters to keep Trump in power for another term. I suddenly felt that perhaps that was not a bad idea. Democracy is only as good as the People who uphold it. I had too many fights on too many fronts. I wanted to see these smug, lying, shameless smiles wiped away. I may have been rush, but I drew my first weapon and mentioned Class-Act Lawsuits. I mentioned O'Neal.A Little Bird Told MeBeing a Real Estate Broker I made several builder friends. One of them told me that it was fine to buy brand new homes as long as I could supply my own inspection services. City Inspectors are notorious for taking bribes, he said. O'Neal bragged to this builder that he found a City Inspector who told him that he could "put these columns down as far as they go" and that's good enough. The owners of the new O'Neal Circle Condominiums inNorth Boulderdiscovered that their new building had moved. Their new windows broke, their new balconies cracked. The asbestos used for construction was now exposed. I heard of a mall that moved much the same way. "Two building a Class Act Law Suit make," I reasoned with Eubanks. Of course, attorneys have a generous budget for advertisement - so they should easily locate additional victims of moving buildings.AnotherColoradofiasco was the Eifes home cladding. Eifes is the best insulation for homes. It is a form of artificial stucco. Combined with the correct ventilation systems it makes for a great, long lasting insulation and easy to maintain, attractive cladding. For some reason the labor intensive Eifes claddings were not properly installed. Owners of brand new homes discovered that moisture was being wicked into their brand new homes and walls. This, in my mind, was a second Class Act lawsuit.The home my husband and I bought inSedaliahas an Eifes cladding. However, it was a home the builder built for himself and lived in for several years. The Eifes was well done. We had nice ventilation that allowed us to enjoy round-the-clock exchange of air with the outside without losing heat or cold. In fact, our entire Stoneridge development seemed to have been properly built.Another Class-Act law suit I could think of was for anyone who suffered noise nuisance due to hardwood flooring or inappropriate flooring upstairs. I suspect that the Codes are already in place and that a Sound Transmission between Units ticket addresses such nuisances to prevent them from ever happening.However, architects are not attorneys. If they have failed to adapt filing International Codes as to prevent Boulder City Residents from noise nuisance due to hardwood or inappropriate flooring options they can be sued. Or, if the architects maliciously amended the Codes as to purposely expose Boulder City Residents to noise nuisance then they can be sued for acting without good faith.Of course, attorneys make a lot of money each time the City refuses to intervene on behalf of residents. But perhaps residents were losing faith in the legal system's willingness to uphold their civil rights. Or perhaps they were getting educated regarding simple services that their City would have provided had it not been for bribes. Wouldn't it be wise to be at the forefront of these great Class Act Lawsuit opportunities? If Jon Berling, who is young and with a new baby at the time of writing this, doesn't have enough equity to sponsor a judge and a couple of attorneys - wouldn't it be nice to add the equity of Jen Ross and LaDonna Eubanks as respondents to these Class Act Law Suits?Another option I entertained was our local 9 News Solves Problems. The public was going to loath Jon and Jen and LaDonna as a news anchor stands in my condo, describing the daily hardship I endure due to obvious Building Code violations. I now suspected that if outside architects were allowed to study existing buildings, say, to install a new underlayment, then perhaps the architects would realize that existing buildings do not follow the building plans stored with the City. Architects might come to the conclusion that City Inspectors take bribes. Was that the reason I was faced with so much opposition? The next day I obtained my building plans from Central Records and called Eubanks to set up an appointment.The Attorney LurkingA warning email to cease and desist was in my mailbox."It has been brought to my attention by numerous staff members that you are not satisfied with their handling of your noise complaint. In reviewing the facts, it is my opinion that this department is unable to assist you further. If you believe there is noise that is interfering with your quiet enjoyment of your home, then the law provides for the Boulder Police Department to respond to a complaint called in and investigate the allegations. If there is noise, the nature of which is unacceptable, then a citation can be issued to the alleged offender.At this time I am requesting that you discontinue the unproductive, slanderous emails you have been sending and the phone calls in which you are yelling and using profanity toward the staff. If you do not immediately cease with this unruly behavior, I will have no choice but to seek an injunction from the court and to refer this matter to the Boulder Police Department for charges of harassment.While it may be frustrating that your alleged issues cannot be resolved by these staff members, it does not give you the right to behave in the manner you continue to demonstrate. I trust this correspondence will be all that is needed for you to refrain from further contact with the Planning and Development Services department. I thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation with this request.Regards,Karyn CarrollBoulderCityAttorney's OfficeSr.Assistant CityAttorney-Prosecution"I don't do the weekend puzzles because I get enough attorney-speak to exercise my brain. I don't think it was Karyn's job to prosecute for either slander or "harassing emails." She was merely pulling a Cease and Disease Scam on me. Except that I had absolutely no contact with her. She was ordering me to not contact others. She doesn't have absolute and arbitrary powers. It should be possible to file a Motion for Mistrial Investigation even before an Advisory Hearing or any charges are filed.Karyn had engaged in Civil Rights Violation Under Color of Authority. 42 U.S.C 1983 discusses civil action when there is deprivation of rights. A couple of years back I would have imagined that the Federal Supreme Court would uphold my rights. A Federal lawsuit looked like a form of insanity to me now. Much like coming before the heads of the Mafia to complain that their people had broken my leg, only to leave with a broken arm.Karyn striked me as a sociopath. That would make her compatible with the Boulder City Attorney. I had observed him during Council Meetings. His tiny predatory eyes would move back and forth like a spider always assessing which insect is how close to which of its webs.Karyn taught me that whenever and wherever any part of society malfunction, look no further than the nearest attorney. The hourly wages "earned" by attorneys are the basis for all that is corrupt in the world. We've had two thousand years of corruption and this book aims at giving birth to a new world.I also learned how important it was to have a Sheriff who is an elective of the People, and who doesn't require Federal protection to intervene with the City.Denverhad an appointed Sheriff. They also had "nine out of ten cops good." Calling 911 is like playing a Russian Rolette. Did you invite one of the demoralized nine good ones over, or did you get the one rapist/thief coming to a scene of vulnerability?Of course, I learned that the Courts can remove any Sheriff that doesn't work for them. I was convinced that Sheriff Arpayo ofArizonawas innocent. His first attorney asked to retire. Attorneys don't retire unless the Judge demands that they participate in crimes. Arpayo's second attorney plead guilty against Arpayo's own conviction and desires. An undercover cop got a confession from the Judge's wife that it was personal.Three other Sheriffs were in prison at the same time. With criminals presiding it was hard to tell if they were guilty of anything. When Chief of Police Pat Sullivan ofAurora,COwas charged with drug trafficking and prostitute trafficking he got nothing but probation. That makes me think these Sheriffs are innocent. The courts can replace any of them. I can't imagine the Schubert types appreciating a KKK controlled police force everywhere. Yet their own greed pushes them towards these scenarios time after time.Karyn might be able to deter local TV stations and news reporters. Much like me, they would also know that her letter is fraudulent. But, much like me they would know that the entire system is corrupt and counter productive. The courts allow journalists to exist as long as they aren't directly confronted. Should they dislike the information given by any newspaper, the courts have the power to financially bankrupt that newspaper. Of course, with Trump in power, there is an attempt to reign in the media, make it more like it is inRussia, with only controlled information getting to the public.This buys Karyn time. It means that I have to write every other media outlet in the country. Each City has a dysfunctional Building Code Enforcement Department and a local media outlet. One email, sent to multiple journalists and editors should generate several informative articles. All they have to do is educate the public regarding their civil rights and building code violations. The local City Attorney would not be on guard for that and would not be involved.The Building Code Enforcement Department inBoulderdoes not take any written complaints. There is no record of any statements by residents. You simply have to "call Jon." If Jon bothers to return a call, he may or may not report the problem, he may or may not correctly open tickets or report how the situation was "resolved." All these are telltale signs of attorney intervention. If Builders are correct in stating that City Inspectors are notorious for taking bribes, that would be due to the interest attorneys take in them. It would make them immune to prosecution in the courts. Most other sectors, disconnected from attorney interests, don't dare take bribes.The natural response is to contact local newspapers in other cities around the county, as well as national newspapers such as the N.Y. Times. During the time I was fighting Former Judge Arkin I got scores of newspaper articles written as a result of approaching these journalists. My favorite one was a N.Y. Times article "There is a Problem with Attorney Licensing." I had written them at 2am. By noon I had a professional article show up at my Facebook page. None of the articles mentioned Former Judge Arkin. None of them dared be as express as I was. The courts are merely keeping newspapers around for as long as they are cordial. An adverse article could get a newspaper sued to the ground. But journalists always found something to write about. Those who read a lot could probably read between the lines.However, if the Shubert Pharaohs were to eliminate all building code violations against me instantly, it would still be eight to twelve weeks before I could close my windows. The ceiling was steeped in sulfates and other chemicals. I preferred to have the Schuberts heat up my home for the time being. The car was fine for now. I would be writing a book sometime in the future - and surely that would put the Building Compliance Department under resident scrutiny..

Hmm… noYou can’t file a police report because you are not a policeman and the question would really be could you convince a policeman to file a police report because you claim that someone has been verbally harassing you at some time over some issue and that answer is almost a certain yes:You could probably find some cop somewhere who would file a police report concerning your claim that you not only say Bigfoot but you think it was a girl Bigfoot and she might be pregnant now but… why would you waste your time because a police report is of no use to you in any way.It sounds as if what you want to know is can you cause criminal charges to be filed against someone for saying something that you didn’t want to hear and the initial answer to that would be no and that is a good thing and maybe but only if well… first let’s talk about the bizarre modern idea that as an American you have a right to not be bothered or upset in any way for any reason at any time.This has never been true and in fact the very first of the amendments one hears so much about includes freedom of speech and speech can be sort of abusive at times but um… that would be a good thing right?As with just about everything there are exceptions of course: a spouse who constantly cuts down the other person doesn’t need to be charged with verbally abusing a spouse but needs to be an x-spouse or at least shown that this will soon occur if the behavior isn’t corrected as soon as possible.And then credit should be given when the attempt is made with the understanding that changing behavior that is often not conscious but formed by bad habits will be a work in progress for at least as long as it took for the habit to form.It is also a possibility that what is really being asked is can you do anything to stop someone from harassing you and the answer to that is SURE… why not?609.748 HARASSMENT; RESTRAINING ORDER.Subdivision 1.Definition.For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given them in this subdivision.(a) "Harassment" includes:(1) a single incident of physical or sexual assault, a single incident of harassment under section 609.749, subdivision 2, clause (8), a single incident of nonconsensual dissemination of private sexual images under section 617.261, or repeated incidents of intrusive or unwanted acts, words, or gestures that have a substantial adverse effect or are intended to have a substantial adverse effect on the safety, security, or privacy of another, regardless of the relationship between the actor and the intended target;(3) a pattern of attending public events after being notified that the actor's presence at the event is harassing to another.(This bullshit of course is troubling because had I known it could be done I would have filed a restraining order against Hillary Clinton attending any of the Democratic ralley(s) on the basis that every time she did she was harrassing me! Sound stupid well yes it does doesn’t it?)(b) "Respondent" includes any adults or juveniles alleged to have engaged in harassment or organizations alleged to have sponsored or promoted harassment.(And again Jehovah's Witnesses knocking on the door come on people!)(c) "Targeted residential picketing" includes the following acts when committed on more than one occasion:(1) marching, standing, or patrolling by one or more persons directed solely at a particular residential building in a manner that adversely affects the safety, security, or privacy of an occupant of the building; or(2) marching, standing, or patrolling by one or more persons which prevents an occupant of a residential building from gaining access to or exiting from the property on which the residential building is located.Subd. 2.Restraining order; court jurisdiction.A person who is a victim of harassment may seek a restraining order from the district court in the manner provided in this section. The parent, guardian, or stepparent of a minor who is a victim of harassment may seek a restraining order from the district court on behalf of the minor. An application for relief under this section may be filed in the county of residence of either party or in the county in which the alleged harassment occurred. There are no residency requirements that apply to a petition for a harassment restraining order.Subd. 3.Contents of petition; hearing; notice.(a) A petition for relief must allege facts sufficient to show the following:(1) the name of the alleged harassment victim;(2) the name of the respondent; and(3) that the respondent has engaged in harassment.A petition for relief must state whether the petitioner has had a previous restraining order in effect against the respondent. The petition shall be accompanied by an affidavit made under oath stating the specific facts and circumstances from which relief is sought. The court shall provide simplified forms and clerical assistance to help with the writing and filing of a petition under this section and shall advise the petitioner of the right to sue in forma pauperis under section 563.01. The court shall advise the petitioner of the right to request a hearing. If the petitioner does not request a hearing, the court shall advise the petitioner that the respondent may request a hearing and that notice of the hearing date and time will be provided to the petitioner by mail at least five days before the hearing. Upon receipt of the petition and a request for a hearing by the petitioner, the court shall order a hearing. Personal service must be made upon the respondent not less than five days before the hearing. If personal service cannot be completed in time to give the respondent the minimum notice required under this paragraph, the court may set a new hearing date. Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring a hearing on a matter that has no merit.(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), the order for a hearing and a temporary order issued under subdivision 4 may be served on the respondent by means of a one-week published notice under section 645.11, if:(1) the petitioner files an affidavit with the court stating that an attempt at personal service made by a peace officer was unsuccessful because the respondent is avoiding service by concealment or otherwise; and(2) a copy of the petition and order for hearing and any temporary restraining order has been mailed to the respondent at the respondent's residence or place of business, if the respondent is an organization, or the respondent's residence or place of business is not known to the petitioner.(c) Regardless of the method of service, if the respondent is a juvenile, whenever possible, the court also shall have notice of the pendency of the case and of the time and place of the hearing served by mail at the last known address upon any parent or guardian of the juvenile respondent who is not the petitioner.(d) A request for a hearing under this subdivision must be made within 20 days of service of the petition.Subd. 3a.Filing fee; cost of service.The filing fees for a restraining order under this section are waived for the petitioner and the respondent if the petition alleges acts that would constitute a violation of section 609.749, subdivision 2, 3, 4, or 5, or sections 609.342 to 609.3451. The court administrator and any peace officer in this state shall perform their duties relating to service of process without charge to the petitioner. The court shall direct payment of the reasonable costs of service of process if served by a private process server when a peace officer is unavailable or if service is made by publication.Subd. 4.Temporary restraining order; relief by court.(a) The court may issue a temporary restraining order that provides any or all of the following:(1) orders the respondent to cease or avoid the harassment of another person; or(2) orders the respondent to have no contact with another person.(b) The court may issue an order under paragraph (a) if the petitioner files a petition in compliance with subdivision 3 and if the court finds reasonable grounds to believe that the respondent has engaged in harassment. When a petition alleges harassment as defined by subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (1), the petition must further allege an immediate and present danger of harassment before the court may issue a temporary restraining order under this section. When signed by a referee, the temporary order becomes effective upon the referee's signature.(c) Notice need not be given to the respondent before the court issues a temporary restraining order under this subdivision. A copy of the restraining order must be served on the respondent along with the order for hearing and petition, as provided in subdivision 3. If the respondent is a juvenile, whenever possible, a copy of the restraining order, along with notice of the pendency of the case and the time and place of the hearing, shall also be served by mail at the last known address upon any parent or guardian of the juvenile respondent who is not the petitioner. A temporary restraining order may be entered only against the respondent named in the petition.(d) The temporary restraining order is in effect until a hearing is held on the issuance of a restraining order under subdivision 5. The court shall hold the hearing on the issuance of a restraining order if the petitioner requests a hearing. The hearing may be continued by the court upon a showing that the respondent has not been served with a copy of the temporary restraining order despite the exercise of due diligence or if service is made by published notice under subdivision 3 and the petitioner files the affidavit required under that subdivision.(e) If the temporary restraining order has been issued and the respondent requests a hearing, the hearing shall be scheduled by the court upon receipt of the respondent's request. Service of the notice of hearing must be made upon the petitioner not less than five days prior to the hearing. The court shall serve the notice of the hearing upon the petitioner by mail in the manner provided in the Rules of Civil Procedure for pleadings subsequent to a complaint and motions and shall also mail notice of the date and time of the hearing to the respondent. In the event that service cannot be completed in time to give the respondent or petitioner the minimum notice required under this subdivision, the court may set a new hearing date.(f) A request for a hearing under this subdivision must be made within 20 days of the date of completed service of the petition.Subd. 5.Restraining order.(a) The court may issue a restraining order that provides any or all of the following:(1) orders the respondent to cease or avoid the harassment of another person; or(2) orders the respondent to have no contact with another person.(b) The court may issue an order under paragraph (a) if all of the following occur:(1) the petitioner has filed a petition under subdivision 3;(2) a peace officer has served respondent with a copy of the temporary restraining order obtained under subdivision 4, and with notice of the right to request a hearing, or service has been made by publication under subdivision 3, paragraph (b); and(3) the court finds at the hearing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the respondent has engaged in harassment.A restraining order may be issued only against the respondent named in the petition; except that if the respondent is an organization, the order may be issued against and apply to all of the members of the organization. If the court finds that the petitioner has had two or more previous restraining orders in effect against the same respondent or the respondent has violated a prior or existing restraining order on two or more occasions, relief granted by the restraining order may be for a period of up to 50 years. In all other cases, relief granted by the restraining order must be for a fixed period of not more than two years. When a referee presides at the hearing on the petition, the restraining order becomes effective upon the referee's signature.(c) An order issued under this subdivision must be personally served upon the respondent.(d) If the court orders relief for a period of up to 50 years under paragraph (a), the respondent named in the restraining order may request to have the restraining order vacated or modified if the order has been in effect for at least five years and the respondent has not violated the order. Application for relief under this paragraph must be made in the county in which the restraining order was issued. Upon receipt of the request, the court shall set a hearing date. Personal service must be made upon the petitioner named in the restraining order not less than 30 days before the date of the hearing. At the hearing, the respondent named in the restraining order has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that there has been a material change in circumstances and that the reasons upon which the court relied in granting the restraining order no longer apply and are unlikely to occur. If the court finds that the respondent named in the restraining order has met the burden of proof, the court may vacate or modify the order. If the court finds that the respondent named in the restraining order has not met the burden of proof, the court shall deny the request and no request may be made to vacate or modify the restraining order until five years have elapsed from the date of denial. An order vacated or modified under this paragraph must be personally served on the petitioner named in the restraining order.Subd. 5a.Short-form notification.(a) In lieu of personal service of a harassment restraining order, a peace officer may serve a person with a short-form notification. The short-form notification must include the following clauses: the respondent's name; the respondent's date of birth, if known; the petitioner's name; the names of other protected parties; the date and county in which the temporary restraining order or restraining order was filed; the court file number; the hearing date and time, if known; the conditions that apply to the respondent, either in checklist form or handwritten; and the name of the judge who signed the order.The short-form notification must be in bold print in the following form:"The restraining order is now enforceable. You must report to your nearest sheriff's office or county court to obtain a copy of the restraining order. You are subject to arrest and may be charged with a misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, or felony if you violate any of the terms of the restraining order or this short-form notification."(b) Upon verification of the identity of the respondent and the existence of an unserved harassment restraining order against the respondent, a law enforcement officer may detain the respondent for a reasonable time necessary to complete and serve the short-form notification.(c) When service is made by short-form notification, it may be proved by the affidavit of the law enforcement officer making the service.(d) For service under this section only, service upon an individual may occur at any time, including Sundays and legal holidays.(e) The superintendent of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension shall provide the short form to law enforcement agencies.[See Note.]Subd. 5b.Service by others.In addition to peace officers, corrections officers, including but not limited to probation officers, court services officers, parole officers, and employees of jails or correctional facilities, may serve a temporary restraining order or restraining order.Subd. 6.Violation of restraining order.(a) A person who violates a restraining order issued under this section is subject to the penalties provided in paragraphs (b) to (d).(b) Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (c) and (d), when a temporary restraining order or a restraining order is granted under this section and the respondent knows of the order, violation of the order is a misdemeanor.(c) A person is guilty of a gross misdemeanor who violates the order within ten years of a previous qualified domestic violence-related offense conviction or adjudication of delinquency.(d) A person is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both, if the person violates the order:(1) within ten years of the first of two or more previous qualified domestic violence-related offense convictions or adjudications of delinquency;(2) because of the victim's or another's actual or perceived race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, disability as defined in section 363A.03, age, or national origin;(3) by falsely impersonating another;(4) while possessing a dangerous weapon;(5) with an intent to influence or otherwise tamper with a juror or a judicial proceeding or with intent to retaliate against a judicial officer, as defined in section 609.415, or a prosecutor, defense attorney, or officer of the court, because of that person's performance of official duties in connection with a judicial proceeding; or(6) against a victim under the age of 18, if the respondent is more than 36 months older than the victim.(e) A person who commits violations in two or more counties may be prosecuted in any county in which one of the acts was committed for all acts in violation of this section.(f) A person may be prosecuted at the place where any call is made or received or, in the case of wireless or electronic communication or any communication made through any available technologies, where the actor or victim resides, or in the jurisdiction of the victim's designated address if the victim participates in the address confidentiality program established under chapter 5B.(g) A peace officer shall arrest without a warrant and take into custody a person whom the peace officer has probable cause to believe has violated an order issued under subdivision 4 or 5 if the existence of the order can be verified by the officer.(h) A violation of a temporary restraining order or restraining order shall also constitute contempt of court.(i) Upon the filing of an affidavit by the petitioner, any peace officer, or an interested party designated by the court, alleging that the respondent has violated an order issued under subdivision 4 or 5, the court may issue an order to the respondent requiring the respondent to appear within 14 days and show cause why the respondent should not be held in contempt of court. The court also shall refer the violation of the order to the appropriate prosecuting authority for possible prosecution under paragraph (b), (c), or (d).Subd. 7.Copy to law enforcement agency.An order granted under this section shall be forwarded by the court administrator within 24 hours to the local law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over the residence of the applicant. Each appropriate law enforcement agency shall make available to other law enforcement officers through a system for verification, information as to the existence and status of any order issued under this section.Subd. 8.Notice.(a) An order granted under this section must contain a conspicuous notice to the respondent:(1) of the specific conduct that will constitute a violation of the order;(2) that violation of an order is either (i) a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for up to 90 days or a fine of up to $1,000, or both, (ii) a gross misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for up to one year or a fine of up to $3,000, or both, or (iii) a felony punishable by imprisonment for up to five years or a fine of up to $10,000, or both; and(3) that a peace officer must arrest without warrant and take into custody a person if the peace officer has probable cause to believe the person has violated a restraining order.(b) If the court grants relief for a period of up to 50 years under subdivision 5, the order must also contain a conspicuous notice to the respondent that the respondent must wait five years to seek a modification of the order.Subd. 9.Effect on local ordinances.Nothing in this section shall supersede or preclude the continuation or adoption of any local ordinance which applies to a broader scope of targeted residential picketing conduct than that described in subdivision 1.§Subd. 10.Prohibition against employer retaliation.(a) An employer shall not discharge, discipline, threaten, otherwise discriminate against, or penalize an employee regarding the employee's compensation, terms, conditions, location, or privileges of employment, because the employee took reasonable time off from work to obtain or attempt to obtain relief under this section. Except in cases of imminent danger to the health or safety of the employee or the employee's child, or unless impracticable, an employee who is absent from the workplace shall give 48 hours' advance notice to the employer. Upon request of the employer, the employee shall provide verification that supports the employee's reason for being absent from the workplace. All information related to the employee's leave pursuant to this section shall be kept confidential by the employer.(b) An employer who violates paragraph (a) is guilty of a misdemeanor and may be punished for contempt of court. In addition, the court shall order the employer to pay back wages and offer job reinstatement to any employee discharged from employment in violation of paragraph (a).(c) In addition to any remedies otherwise provided by law, an employee injured by a violation of paragraph (a) may bring a civil action for recovery of damages, together with costs and disbursements, including reasonable attorneys fees, and may receive such injunctive and other equitable relief, including reinstatement, as determined by the court.Yea there you go: or maybe just telling the person to step off or having someone else do it but then no… that means that the verbal abuser would just file a harassment order against the person who told him/her to stop harassing and that would require the second harassment order recipient to then be forced to file a harassment order against the filer of that order and eventually someone in my family will come along and simply choose to spend some time in jail or prison just to stop the madness and teach a few lessons about tolerance and the rights and duties concerning civil discourse and my head is aching just thinking of the drama that quite frankly doesn’t really have to exist.