Department Of The Treasury Internal Revenue Service Shareholder'S Instructions For S: Fill & Download for Free

One and only website which I can say is best to score good marks in the exams is http://www.snaptutorial.com where you can find all the courses related to your exams.ETH 321 Week 1 Individual Assignment Laws and Ethics Paper (2 Papers)The purpose of this assignment is to differentiate between law and ethics, understand how both affect today's business environment, and identify the importance of alternative dispute resolution in business.Assignment StepsDevelop a 1,050-word summary contrasting law and ethics describing the following:·Describe how laws or regulations affect your past or current job or industry.·Describe how ethical rules affect your past or current job or industry and explain why ethics are considered an asset to a workplace.·Discuss the various types of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and analyze which types of ADRs are regularly used in your workplace.Cite a minimum of two peer-reviewed references.Format your paper consistent with APA guidelinesETH 321 Week 1 Individual Assignment Role and Functions of Law Paper (2 Papers)Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you discuss the roles of law and courts in today's business environment.Differentiate the federal court structure with your state's court structure.Discuss the concept of judicial review.Explain how laws or regulations affect your present job or industry.Properly cite at least two references from your reading.Cite your research and format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.ETH 321 Week 1 Knowledge Check1.What has been one of the focus areas of law in the United States over the past few decades?2.Identify the true statement about the role of law in the United States.3.Which of the following is one of the purposes of law today?4.Identify the true statement about the American judiciary.5.What is the function of an appellate court?6.Identify the courts that conduct primary trials for issues that involve federal matters such as federal regulations and statutes. The courts also hear a range of matters and provide decisions that are binding only on the parties involved.7.What is true about arbitration as an alternative form of dispute resolution?8.Sigma Inc. and Beta LLC. are two companies involved in a dispute. Both companies have agreed to appoint a third party, an attorney, to listen to their arguments and help them reach an agreement. The third party, however, will not render any kind of decision for the two parties involved. What type of alternative form of dispute resolution is being used by Sigma Inc. and Beta LLC.?http://9.In certain cases, the legal issues involve the intricacies of a specific industry or profession. In such cases, which type of alternative dispute resolution is used in which a neutral professional is hired to assess and evaluate facts and arguments. The professional is expected to come up with an appropriate solution or recommendation. The professional could also collect more information, if required, for the case.ETH 321 Week 2 Assignment Business Torts and Intellectual Property (Sam, ABC Paper Corp)The purpose of this assignment is to identify the form of intellectual property outlined, and to examine the different types of torts committed.Assignment StepsScenario: Sam is an employee of ABC Paper Corp. He signed a non-disclosure agreement as a condition of his employment with ABC. Sam is approached by XYZ Paper Co. with an offer of employment, but only if he brings his client list with him. Sam was fully responsible for creating his client list, so he agrees to provide it to XYZ. When Sam downloads his client list onto an external flash drive, he is caught in the act by his boss Natalie. Sam grabs the flash drive and runs out of his office, shoving Natalie aside when she attempts to stop him. Natalie falls and hits her head against the doorknob, suffering a concussion.Develop a 1,050-word analysis using the information posed in the scenario.·Identify if there is an intellectual property at issue here. If so, what type?·Discuss if Sam's actions are ethical. Why or why not?·Discuss the types of tort, if any, Sam committed. Did any of the other parties in this scenario commit a tort?·Discuss if any of Sam's actions subject him to criminal liability.Cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed references.Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignmentETH 321 Week 2 Individual Assignment Business Torts And Ethics Paper (2 Papers)You own University Heights Apartments, a business that rents primarily to students. One evening, your tenant Sharon is attacked by an intruder who forces the lock on the sliding glass door of her ground-floor apartment. Sharon's screams attract the attention of Darryl, your resident manager, who comes to Sharon's aid. Together, Darryl and Sharon drive the intruder off, but not before they both are badly cut by the intruder.Write a paper of 700- to 1,050-words answering the questions posed by this scenario.Is the intruder liable for what he has done? Why or why not?Do you have legal responsibilities to Sharon and Darryl? Why or why not?Do you have ethical responsibilities to Sharon and Darryl? Explain. If there are ethical responsibilities, what are they?What should you do to prevent or mitigate such risks?Cite to at least four scholarly references.Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignmentETH 321 Week 2 Knowledge Check1.Identify the true statement about a claim of defamation.2.Who among the following is given absolute privilege or immunity against defamation?3.Delta Inc. has filed a lawsuit against one of its new franchisees for providing false information about the amount of its profits it would give to Delta every month. Delta has also ascertained that the incorrect information caused pecuniary damages to Delta as well as damages to its reputation. What type of business tort is illustrated in the scenario?4.What is likely to make a plaintiff's case stronger in a negligence lawsuit?5.In cases of negligence, what is one problem in applying the but for test?6.Which doctrine allows a plaintiff to presume that a defendant caused certain damages without describing exactly how the defendant behaved?7.What is true about strict liability?8.Venus Corp. is a building demolition company that produces large quantities of plastic explosives, which are stored in its warehouses. These warehouses are typically insulated and protected against damage. However, one day, a worker unintentionally causes an explosion in one of the warehouses, damaging buildings around it and causing injury to some individuals in the area. Which type of liability will a court most likely impose on Venus Corp.?9.Identify the basis upon which strict liability is imposed on a company for damages caused in the event of an incident.10.Omega Inc. has filed a lawsuit against one of its employees. This employee has been transferring monthly sums of company money into his personal account. He has been simultaneously altering the company's financial records to indicate that the money is still in the company account. What kind of white collar crime is illustrated in the scenario?11.Identify the white collar crime that involves a fraudulent entity attracting investors, offering them high returns, and paying these returns, not from profits, but from investments made by subsequent investors.12.Choose the correct statement about white collar crimes in the United States.ETH 321 Week 2 Team Assignment Torts And Ethics Presentation (2 PPT)Create an 8- to 10-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation in which your team members include the following:Summarize the key points of the Business Torts and Ethics Individual assignmentDefend your collective findings and conclusionsDiscuss the different types of torts that may arise in a business situationClick the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.ETH 321 Week 3 Assignment Business Forms and Silent Partnership (2 Papers)The purpose of this assignment is to select the best organizational form, and to discuss ethical concerns with the business scenario.Assignment StepsScenario: Adam and Laura wish to open a pet grooming shop called Dazzling Doggies Day Spa. Laura’s mother Beth would like to contribute the startup costs in exchange for a share of profits, but she doesn’t want to participate in the daily operations of the business. She also doesn’t want to have any personal liability in the business.Develop a 350- to 700-word summary with the following information:·Which business organizational form would be best given the above circumstances, and why?·Unbeknownst to Laura and Beth, Adam begins to use Dazzling Doggies Day Spa’s checking account to pay all his personal bills. Are his actions ethical? Why or why not?Cite a minimum of two peer-reviewed references.Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.ETH 321 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Contract Clause & Intellectual Property Drafting Paper (3 Papers)Draft a contract clause regarding one of the following topics:Dispute Resolution ClauseORIntellectual Property (IP) Clause regarding ownership of IPWrite a paper of 700- to 1,050-words in which you explain the following:Explain any legal issues regarding your selected clauseHow your contract clause can be applied in a business managerial setting for either a personal, real, or IP dispute or an IP property clause regarding either owner of IP or trade secrets.In the event the contract was breached, what might be the best possible remedies for this and why?Cite at least 3 scholarly references.Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.ETH 321 Week 3 Team Assignment Contract Law and Ethics Case Study (2 Papers)Purpose of AssignmentThe purpose of this assignment is to discuss the legally required elements necessary to form a contract, the ethical considerations, and the remedies for breach.Assignment StepsDiscuss Case 8.3 Vassilkovska v. Woodfield Nissan, Inc. with your Learning Team. This case is found in The Legal and Regulatory Environment of Business, pg. 243.Develop a 700-word case study using the following format: facts, issues, rule, analysis, and conclusion.Analyze whether Woodfield's actions in drafting the arbitration agreement were ethical.Discuss what remedies Vassilkovska may seek if Woodfield is found to have misrepresented the price of the car as alleged.Cite a minimum of two peer-reviewed references.Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.Note: Grades are awarded based upon individual contributions to the Learning Team assignment. Each Learning Team member receives a grade based upon his/her contributions to the team assignment. Not all students may receive the same grade for the team assignment.ETH 321 Week 4 Assignment Environmental Law and Ethics (2 Papers)Purpose of AssignmentThe purpose of this assignment is to analyze the duties of administrative agencies and the ethics behind regulatory compliance requirements.Assignment StepsScenario: Eric is an Assistant Vice President at marine paint manufacturing plant. One day, he accidentally discovers an email from his boss, the Vice President, to the President, notifying him of an internal study finding the paint leeches from the bottom of boats into the marine environment. The paint has been found to create birth defects in marine life. He also sees the President's response email, in which he directs the Vice President to erase all evidence of the study and tell no one. The President also directs the Vice President to erase the email. Eric is concerned about the findings of the study, but he also fears losing his job.Create a 350- to 700-word analysis with the following information:·Which administrative agency governs regulatory compliance of the manufacturer?·What are the ethical concerns regarding the President's actions, and what do you believe Eric should do?Cite a minimum of two peer-reviewed references.Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.ETH 321 Week 4 Team Assignment Environmental Law Case StudyPurpose of AssignmentThe purpose of this assignment is to discuss the reasons for regulatory agencies and ethical considerations regarding regulatory compliance.Assignment StepsDiscuss Case 15.2 Food and Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation with your Learning Team. This case is found in The Legal and Regulatory Environment of Business, pg. 459.Develop a 350- to 700-word case study using the following format: facts, issues, rule, analysis, and conclusion.Discuss the purpose of regulatory agencies and how laws are balanced with ethical concerns.Cite a minimum of two peer-reviewed references.Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.Note: Grades are awarded based upon individual contributions to the Learning Team assignment. Each Learning Team member receives a grade based upon his/her contributions to the team assignment. Not all students may receive the same grade for the team assignment.ETH 321 Week 4 Assignment Supreme Court Oral Argument PowerPoint (2 PPT)Supreme Court Oral Argument PowerPointInstructions:Select one of the US Supreme Court cases listed on the Oyezwebsite http://www.2014-2015 Term . Select a case which wasdecided by the court after 1965. To help you select a landmark case ofthe court, I recommend that you select from the cases listed on this webpage http://en.http://wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States. The case should deal with a agency of the federalgovernment, and/or discrimination, and/or one of the followingconstitutional amendments (1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, or 14th). Read the casesummary and listen to the oral argument of the case found on the Oyezwebsite. Prepare a PowerPoint presentation, with a minimum of sevenslides. The presentation should contain the follow:1. Cover slide2. Summary of the main facts3. List of the major legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court4. Summary of the main arguments set forth by the parties5. Comments or observations about the oral argument6. Summary of the Supreme Court’s decision.7. ReferencesETH 321 Week 4 Individual Assignment Sarbanes-Oxley And Corporate Governance Paper (2 Papers)Read "Case 15.3 Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board" in Ch. 15 of the text.Write a paper of 700- to 1,050-words in which you answer the following:If auditing of financial statements is required for the protection of public investors, should not all PCAOB members be taken from the investment community that uses audited financial statements? Why or why not?How does the decision in this case impact the validity of the Board and other provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act?Cite at least 3 peer-reviewed sources.Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.ETH 321 Week 4 Knowledge Check1.Identify the true statement about administrative agencies.2.Which of these demonstrates the adjudication function of administrative agencies?3.What is true about the activities of administrative agencies?4.Identify the true statement about the rulemaking process followed by administrative agencies.5.What is true about the powers of administrative agencies?6.Which power of administrative agencies allows them to create quasi-court trial settings to hear disputes that arise in their jurisdictions?7.When does misappropriation of a trade secret occur?8.Identify the true statement about trade secret protection.9.Identify the true statement about the Uniform Trade Secrets Act.10.What is true about arbitrary trademarks?11.What statement is true in the context of acquiring trademark rights?12.Which of these can be protected under the Copyright Act?ETH 321 Week 4 Learning Team Assignment Administrative Agencies Presentation (3 PPT)Visit the websites of any three state or federal administrative agencies: for example National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Federal Communication Commission (FCC), and others.Create an 8- to 10-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation with detailed speaker notes in which the team includes the following:An explanation of the role and function of each of the three agencies and how this affects businesses.One significant regulation that each agency enforces.An explanation of how these regulations create compliance requirements for businesses.Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.ETH 321 Week 4 Team Assignment Environmental Law Case Study (2 Papers)Purpose of AssignmentThe purpose of this assignment is to discuss the reasons for regulatory agencies and ethical considerations regarding regulatory compliance.Assignment StepsDiscuss Case 15.2 Food and Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation with your Learning Team. This case is found in The Legal and Regulatory Environment of Business, pg. 459.Develop a 350- to 700-word case study using the following format: facts, issues, rule, analysis, and conclusion.Discuss the purpose of regulatory agencies and how laws are balanced with ethical concerns.Cite a minimum of two peer-reviewed references.Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.Note: Grades are awarded based upon individual contributions to the Learning Team assignment. Each Learning Team member receives a grade based upon his/her contributions to the team assignment. Not all students may receive the same grade for the team assignment.ETH 321 Week 5 Assignment Analysis of the Equal Rights AmendmentAnalysis of the Equal Rights AmendmentInstructions:Every year since 1923, a version of the Equal Rights Amendment hasbeen introduced in Congress. In 1972, it was passed by Congress, butultimately fell three states short of the 38 state ratification requirement,when the time period set for ratification expired in 1982.The current version of the amendment sponsored by CongresswomanCarol Moloney reads:''SECTION 1. Women shall have equal rights in the 11 United Statesand every place subject to its jurisdiction. 12 Equality of rights under thelaw shall not be denied or 13 abridged by the United States or by anyState on account 14 of sex.https://maloney.house.gov/issues/womens-issues/equal-rightsamendmentWrite a 200 to 500 word explanation of why you support or opposeadding the proposed Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution.Make sure that you include some discussion of 14th Amendment levelsof scrutiny in your explanation.SupportingMaterial:The Legal and Regulatory Environment of Business,Ch. 20ETH 321 Week 5 Assignment Employment Classification and Discrimination (New Syllabus)Purpose of AssignmentThe purpose of this assignment is to discuss the elements of the different types of employment relationships and to analyze the ethics behind potentially discriminatory employment policies.Assignment StepsScenario: An employee is hired by Dream Massage to be a massage therapist. She is hired as an independent contractor and, therefore, receives no tax withholding or employment benefits. Dream Massage requires the employee to work a set schedule, provides her clients and all her massage products, and exercises complete control over how she does her work. In addition, when the employee shows up to work the first day, she is informed by her employer she cannot wear her hijab as it violates the company's dress policy.Create a 700- to 1,050-word report in which you examine the employment issues presented in the scenario, including the following:·Analyze whether the employee qualifies as an employee or independent contractor.·Discuss whether Dream Massage has potentially violated any employment discrimination laws.·Analyze the ethical considerations behind maintaining a rigid company dress policy.Cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed references.Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.ETH 321 Week 5 Individual Assignment Discrimination And Employment Laws (2 Papers)Read the "Sidebar 20.6" in Ch. 20 of the text.Write paper of 700- to 1,050-words in which you analyze the sexual harassment issues presented in scenario.Analyze each of the elements of this case: the applicable defenses and the basis for the court's ruling.Analyze the possible liability in this case if the sexual harasser(s) were an independent contractor versus an employee.Cite to at least three peer-reviewed sources.Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.ETH 321 Week 5 Knowledge Check1.What is one of the challenges in business ethics?2.What can help managers to overcome the challenge of teaching business ethics to employees?3.How can an organization faced with the challenges of business ethics, overcome these challenges?4.Stephan is a proponent of the narrow view of corporate social responsibility (CSR). He believes that people should behave in a socially responsible manner on their own time. What other opinion is Stephan likely to have?5.Which view of corporate social responsibility (CSR) suggests that the emphasis of corporations should be on CSR and not on achieving profitability? This view also suggests that the existence of corporations is based on the premise that they will serve society.6.What is true about the moderate view of corporate social responsibility (CSR)?7.In the context of business ethics, what is one of the provisions granted by the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act?8.In which case is the discharge of an employee considered to be wrongful in the context of the Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act?9.Which inconsistency is likely to complicate the risk for whistleblowers in organizations?ETH 321 Week 5 Learning Team Assignment Employment Law Case Brief And Presentation (3 Presentation)Read "The IRAC method of case study analysis" found in the Week 5 Electronic Reserve Readings.Select one legal case from the following list and discuss the case with your Learning Team.Case 20.1 Thompson v. North American Stainless, LPCase 20.2 Ricci v. DestefanoCase 21.1 IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezCase 21.2 Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.Case 21.3 Staub v. Proctor HospitalWrite a case brief using the IRAC method.Create an 8- to 10-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation in which your team members summarize how the legal concepts in the selected case can be applied within a business managerial setting.Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.ETH 321 Week 5 Team Assignment Roles of State Administrative Agencies PPTVisit the website of any three state or federal administrative agencies: for example National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Social Security Administration (SSA), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), or Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).Explain the role and function of each agency in a 6- to 9-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint®presentation with detailed speaker notesInclude one significant regulation that each agency enforces.Format your presentation consistent with APA guidelines.Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.ETH 321 Week 5 Team Final Research Paper (Gun Control)Final Research PaperInstructions:Your Learning Team will prepare a 15 to 20 page research paper tobe submitted by the final day of class. The paper will be on the topicselected by your team during week one.This paper will be a research paper, which should provide acomprehensive discussion of your topic. As you can see below, yourteam will be preparing Article Critiques on articles related to the topicduring the class. These articles will be a part of your research.However, the final research paper should not be a compilation of theArticle Critiques. You should include at least eight citations of sourceson the reference page. The paper should be submitted in APA format.SupportingMaterial:Week 5 Electronic Reserve ReadingsETH 321 Final Exam Guide (New)Civil enforcement powers regarding federal antitrust matters belong to _______.•the Treasury Department•the Department of Revenue and Taxation•the FTC and the Department of Justice•the Department of LaborWhich of the following is true of tort law?•It protects people from being tried twice for the same crime.•Tort law typically deals with breach of contract.•It provides compensation to those workers who have been injured on the job.•It sets limits on how people can act and use their resources.Fred takes Betty to dinner at a very expensive and exclusive restaurant. The menu does not mention prices. The server takes their order and both Betty and Fred enjoy the meal immensely. When the bill comes, Fred refuses to pay because the menu had no prices and because he and the server never engaged in language indicating and offer and acceptance. The server said, “Are you ready to order?” and when Fred said “Yes,” the server merely asked “What may I get you tonight?” Which of the following is true?•Fred must pay based on an implied-in-fact contract theory.•Fred must pay based on a promissory estoppel theory.•Fred must pay based on expressed contract theory.•Fred is correct because no contract was formed.Which of the following statements is true of the WARN Act?•It requires employers to give notice to an “at will” employee that he/she is being fired.•It requires employers to give notice to employees that they are being subjected to polygraph tests.•It requires employers to give notice to employees that an unscheduled drug test will be conducted for all employees.•It requires employers to give notice of a scheduled mass layoff._____________ jurisprudence supports the idea that law can and should change to meet new developments in society.•Sociological•Natural•Historical•Positive lawWhich of the following is true of the assumption of risks during delivery of goods?•The buyer is responsible for damages to goods when the seller is about to transfer for shipment.•The seller is liable for any damages incurred to the goods during shipment.•The buyer is liable for any damages incurred to the goods during shipment.•The seller is always responsible for shipping the goods to the buyer.A 911 emergency response service needs operators who are bilingual in English and Spanish. A few applicants of Spanish origin are rejected due to poor English-speaking skills. They file a complaint on the grounds of discrimination based on nationality. Their complaint is squashed. Here, the defense of the federal government is on the grounds of _______.•inculpatory evidence•circumstantial evidence•bona fide occupational qualifications•exclusionary ruleArticle 6 of the Treaty on European Union, called the Maastricht Treaty, states the EU is founded on:• private markets• rule of law• specific performance•stare decisisInterpreting Congressional intent, which of the following is never a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ)?•Race•National origin•Sex•ReligionEthical formalists maintain that:•the good of the many always supersedes the good of the few.•harm to an individual is allowable as long as it serves a greater good.•harm to individual rights is never justified by an increase in organizational or common good.•values are situational and change based on circumstance.The classification of crime is based on ________.•punishment imposed if convicted•prior record•location• the judge's prerogativeWhich of the following issues of administrative agencies relates to the substantive outcome of agencies’ rule-making and adjudicating authority?•The administrative process is overwhelmed with paperwork and meetings.•Enforcement of some laws varies over time.•The reward system usually does not make a significant distinction between excellent, mediocre, and poor performance.•It is very difficult to discharge unsatisfactory employees.Which of the following is true of the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) techniques?•Disputing parties can agree to use an ADR technique after the dispute arises.•ADR techniques are ineffective once the pretrial process has begun.•Disputing parties cannot use an ADR technique not specified in the original agreement.•Disputing parties must begin a lawsuit to use any form of ADR.The crucial issue with the continuity factor of a business’s organizational form is _______.•the method by which the business can be dissolved•profit distribution•the method of customer service observed•management styleThe ___________ holds that contracts or conspiracies in restraint are illegal only if they constitute undue or unreasonable restraints of trade and that only unreasonable attempts to monopolize are covered by the Sherman Act.•rules of per se legality•Parker v. Brown doctrine•duty to deal doctrine•rule of reasonInterest-based negotiations are superior to position-based negotiations because:•the difference between the interests of the parties is often large.•interest-based negotiation requires the presence of a judge or magistrate.•position-based negotiation is often only concerned with preparing for litigation.•interest-based negotiations allow room for consideration of non-factual concerns, such as relationships and long-term interests.The determination that a crime has been committed and that evidence is sufficient to warrant the accused standing trial is known as:•nolo contendere.•indictment.•double jeopardy.• probable cause.Which of the following is true under the regulations of interstate commerce?•Regulation on any activity is appropriate if it aids interstate commerce.•Activities affecting interstate commerce do not come under the power of the deferral government.•Intrastate activities affecting interstate commerce can be regulated only by the state governments.•The states have the exclusive power to commerce that passes that passes across their lines.Finishing the construction of a home two days after the contract called for completion (no injury occurs) most likely will be considered _______.•significant performance•substantial performance•breach of contract•implied performanceFrequent, abusive, threatening phone calls by creditors are most likely to provoke the basis for a claim of _____________.•intentional infliction of emotional distress•malicious representation•misrepresentation•false imprisonment and malicious prosecutionWhich of the following is true of a violation of trade secrets’ rights?•One must misappropriate another's information.•Unauthorized use of another's information constitutes a violation of trade secrets' rights.•One must use another's information without permission.•Stealing another's intellectual property violates trade secrets' rights.Which of the following states that parties to a written contract may not introduce oral evidence to change written terms?•The parol evidence rule•Concurrent conditions•Conditions subsequent•The statute of fraudsIn a(n) ___________, the shareholders are taxed only on income distributed.•sole proprietorship•corporation•limited partnership. limited liability company____________ is a court created rule that limits when courts can review administrative decisions.•The doctrine of estoppel•The doctrine of lapse•The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies•The doctrine of primary jurisdictionAn employee at-will can be fired for which of the following?•Making public statements about the hazardous working conditions in a company.•Making public the fact that the employer was cheating the government on a defense contract.•Taking time off from work to care for a dependent without informing the employer.•Taking time off from work to serve on jury duty after the boss asked the employee to request a waiver.The ideas and philosophies that explain the origin of law and its justification are called:•jurisprudence•stare decisis•torts•rule of lawFederal law and business leaders alike favor ____________ as a means of governing private business ethics.•establishment of federal regulators in all private companies to establish and enforce ethical standards•self-regulation by companies•giving the federal government exclusive jurisdiction regarding ethics and ethics violation enforcement•creating uniform statutes of business ethicsWhich of the following is true in cases where only one party drafts the contracts that contain terms that appear vague and ambiguous to the other party?•The court will interpret the ambiguous and vague terms against the party that drafts them.•The court will declare the drafting party’s behavior as a tort due to intentional ambiguity of terms.•The court will interpret the terms as they mean in the common language.•The court will reject the non-drafting party’s attempt to reinterpret the terms after the contract has been signed.Myra offers to sell her home to Hanna for “about $100,000 plus closing costs.” Hanna accepts Myra’s offer, but later a dispute arises concerning the precise dollar amount of the purchase price. How will a court resolve this dispute?•The court will appoint a licensed real estate appraiser to determine the price to be paid by Hanna.•The court will require Hanna to pay the average of her price and Myra’s price.•The court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract.•The court will determine a reasonable price to be paid by Hanna.Hillward Bakers has been using a blue HB logo with a baker’s hat on the HB since their inception ten years ago. Hobart Bakers, a newly opened bakery and confectionary chain, has used the same logo. Hillward has not registered its logo, but it chooses to sue Hobart anyway. Which of the following is true of this case?•Hillward can sue Hobart since the logo has been used by Hillward and is associated with it.•Hillward cannot sue Hobart because logos cannot be patented or trademarked.•Hillward cannot sue Hobart since the logo has not been registered as a trademark.• Hobart can defend that Hillward created something that lacks utility and cannot be trademarked.ETH 321 Final Exam Guide (New)1​Which of the following statements is true of a grand jury?​A grand jury has the authority to subpoena business records relevant to a lawsuit.​A grand jury determines whether the accused in a lawsuit is innocent or guilty.​At least 20 members should be present on a grand jury to examine evidences and vote on a case.​For an indictment to be returned, only one-third of a grand jury needs to agree that a crime has been committed.2Alan and Miriam are engaged in a debate on the importance of intellectual property rights. While Alan holds the view that intellectual property protection safeguards the interests of businesses, Miriam thinks that it ultimately puts businesses at a disadvantage by hampering the dissemination of information. Which of the following arguments is most likely to be raised by Alan to strengthen his proposition?​​Intellectual property rights reduce the pace of research and development drastically.​Intellectual property rights result in an increased availability of products.​Intellectual property rights reduce businesses’ market share by facilitating competition.​Intellectual property rights allow businesses to charge premium prices for their products.3​According to the __________, the acceptance of an offer results in a binding contract only if it exactly matches the terms of the offer.​mirror image rule​parol evidence rule​exclusive remedy rule​mailbox rule4The __________ enacted in 1938 established minimum wage, overtime pay, and record-keeping requirements.​​Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act​Family and Medical Leave Act​Fair Labor Standards Act​Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act5The term __________ refers to the placing of an individual in immediate apprehension for his or her physical safety.​​defamation​conversion​assault​battery6The term __________ refers to any change in the ownership of a business organization that would alter its legal existence.​​dissolution​consideration​rescission​conversion7Which of the following statements is true of the Securities and Exchange Commission?​​Its members are appointed by the senate for a term of four years.​It is responsible for implementing the federal securities laws.​It lacks the authority to frame rules regarding transactions of securities.​Its members are either lawyers or security analysts.8A system of equally applied law is a necessity for the foundation of a strong, productive economy because it:​​allows economically strong nations to exploit the resources of weaker nations.​incentivizes private businesses to restrict job opportunities for well-educated people.​encourages strangers to make agreements on certainty and trust.​prohibits individuals from trading in modern private markets.9​Which of the following scenarios illustrates a formalist approach to business decisions?​Selling products by deceiving customers about possible negative aspects of the products​Monitoring employee browsing history without their consent to curb non-productive activities​Informing new customers about delays in production schedules​Assigning significantly high productivity targets to reduce costs10A(n) __________ refers to the individual or business entity offering a security for sale to the public.​​controlling person​seller​issuer​underwriter11​Windy and Ruby plan to present a paper on intellectual property rights. They decide that Windy will present the arguments in favor of intellectual property rights and that Ruby will argue how intellectual property rights could be detrimental to businesses and their customers. Which of the following is most likely to be Ruby’s argument?​Intellectual property rights reduce businesses’ prospects of economic return on investment.​Intellectual property rights reduce the pace of research and development drastically.​Intellectual property rights result in a decrease in the availability of products.​Intellectual property rights do not allow businesses to charge premium prices for their products.12Which of the following statements is true of white-collar crimes?​​They are usually committed for personal financial gain.​They rarely affect consumers of a business.​They rarely occur in business environments.​They are dependent on the threat of physical force.13​Which of the following scenarios illustrates a bilateral contract?​Grapevine Inc. follows a five-day workweek system and also offers a compressed workweek option.​Sameera, a writer, signs a contract with her publisher to publish her book.​Helen, a painter, signs a contract with an art gallery that agrees to purchase her painting for $2000.​The management of Uno Inc. offers additional benefits to its employees annually.question14The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was created through the __________.​​National Labor Relations Act​Civil Rights Act​Age Discrimination in Employment Act​Americans with Disabilities Act15Concerted efforts to lobby government officials, irrespective of their anticompetitive purposes, are given an exception from the Sherman Act under the __________.​​overbreadth doctrine​Colgate doctrine​Noerr-Pennington doctrine​incorporation doctrine16​A __________ is the simplest and least expensive business institution to create.​limited liability company​partnership​sole proprietorship​corporation17In a state court system, lawsuits filed by parties typically begin at the __________.​​federal district court level​appellate court level​trial court level​supreme court level18According to the Commerce Clause, the power to regulate interstate commerce is vested with __________.​​state governments​state-level courts​the federal government​the U.S. Supreme Court19A business decision maker’s decision is more likely to raise ethical concerns in a society where:​​there is an increase in demand for public education.​the family structure is stable.​the news media and the Internet have significant influence.​there is a decrease in economic interdependence.20​How does law hold diverse people of different backgrounds into large, organized groups?​It prevents enforcement institutions from enforcing written rules on strangers.​It tells the members of a society what they can and cannot do.​It discourages people from making agreements based on certainty and trust.​It allows strangers to adopt rules that support their beliefs.21Courts determine whether the language of an offer was clear enough to result in a contract by:​​examining the objective intent of the offeror.​investigating whether an offeree actually accepted the offer.​examining the adequacy of the consideration offered.​analyzing whether the terms of the acceptance matches the terms of the offer.22​Who among the following individuals commits a battery?​Amanda, who fires her employee Trevor without any notice and causes him severe mental distress​Yuki, who injures her boss Reese with a knife and inflicts serious injuries on him​Joan, the customer care manager in a retail store, who verbally threatens a customer who calls to complain about a faulty product​Vincent, the CEO of Gregon Inc., who pays media firms to circulate false information about Gregon’s chief competitor23Fuzo Inc., a manufacturer of leather bags, enters into a contract with a firm regarding the installation of a machine in Fuzo’s factory. Fuzo agrees to pay $1000 for the machine and another $200 as the installation charge. In this scenario, the terms of the sale will be covered under __________.​​the Federal Arbitration Act​the Uniform Commercial Code​the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act​the Internal Revenue Code24The term __________ refers to the act of referring a matter to arbitration.​​submission​settlement​litigation​conflict25__________ is a legal remedy to a breach of contract by which each party to the contract returns the consideration offered by the other.​​Arbitration​Specific performance​Negotiated settlement​Rescission26​Which of the following statements is true of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) systems?​ADR systems increase the costs incurred during the litigation process.​The parties to a dispute need not present the case to a jury before opting for ADR systems to settle the dispute.​ADR systems cannot be used for dispute resolution in contractual relationships unless they are specified in the contract.​The litigation process precludes the use of ADR systems.27The __________ is the constitutional provision that details the federal government’s power to regulate business activities.​​Commerce Clause​liquidated damages clause​equal protection clause​supremacy clausequestion28Which of the following legal remedies to a breach of contract allows the parties to the contract to agree to abide by the decision of a third party or parties?​​Arbitration​Specific performance​Negotiated settlement​Rescission29__________ refers to an agreement made between competitors in an industry to fix prices of their products.​​Horizontal price fixing​Resale price fixing​Indirect price fixing​Vertical price fixing30The petition for a writ of certiorari by the losing party of a litigation will be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court:​​if the winning party agrees to subsequent reviews.​if the federal district courts and the courts of appeal correct the judicial errors charged against the state court.​if at least one of the nine justices vote to take the case.​if there is a major conflict between the trial and appellate courts on the interpretation of federal law.ETH 321 All Assignments (2 Set, No Final Guide)ETH 321 Week 1 Individual Assignment Laws and Ethics Paper (2 Papers)ETH 321 Week 1 DQETH 321 Week 2 Assignment Business Torts and Intellectual Property (Sam, ABC Paper Corp)ETH 321 Week 2 DQsETH 321 Week 3 Assignment Business Forms and Silent Partnership (2 Papers)ETH 321 Week 3 DQsETH 321 Week 4 Assignment Environmental Law and Ethics (2 Papers)ETH 321 Week 4 Team Assignment Environmental Law Case StudyETH 321 Week 4 DQsETH 321 Week 5 Assignment Employment Classification and Discrimination (New Syllabus)ETH 321 Week 5 DQsETH 321 Week 3 Team Assignment Contract Law and Ethics Case StudyETH 321 Week 1 Individual Assignment Role and Functions of Law Paper (2 Papers)ETH 321 Week 1 Knowledge CheckETH 321 Week 2 Individual Assignment Business Torts And Ethics Paper (2 Papers)ETH 321 Week 2 Team Assignment Torts And Ethics Presentation (2 PPT)ETH 321 Week 2 knowledge CheckETH 321 Week 3 Individual Assignment Business Forms Worksheet (2 Sheet)ETH 321 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Contract Clause & Intellectual Property Drafting Paper (3 Papers)ETH 321 Week 3 knowledge CheckETH 321 Week 4 Individual Assignment Sarbanes-Oxley And Corporate Governance Paper (2 Papers)ETH 321 Week 4 Learning Team Assignment Administrative Agencies Presentation (3 PPT)ETH 321 Week 4 knowledge CheckETH 321 Week 5 Team Assignment Roles of State or Federal Administrative Agencies PresentationETH 321 Week 5 Learning Team Assignment Employment Law Case Brief And Presentation (3 Presentation)ETH 321 Week 5 Individual Assignment Discrimination And Employment Laws (2 Papers)ETH 321 Week 5 Knowledge CheckETH 321 All Assignments (2 Set, With Final Guide)ETH 321 Final Exam Guide (New)ETH 321 Week 1 Individual Assignment Laws and Ethics Paper (2 Papers)ETH 321 Week 1 DQETH 321 Week 2 Assignment Business Torts and Intellectual Property (Sam, ABC Paper Corp)ETH 321 Week 2 DQsETH 321 Week 3 Assignment Business Forms and Silent Partnership (2 Papers)ETH 321 Week 3 DQsETH 321 Week 4 Assignment Environmental Law and Ethics (2 Papers)ETH 321 Week 4 Team Assignment Environmental Law Case StudyETH 321 Week 4 DQsETH 321 Week 5 Assignment Employment Classification and Discrimination (New Syllabus)ETH 321 Week 5 DQsETH 321 Week 3 Team Assignment Contract Law and Ethics Case StudyETH 321 Week 1 Individual Assignment Role and Functions of Law Paper (2 Papers)ETH 321 Week 1 Knowledge CheckETH 321 Week 2 Individual Assignment Business Torts And Ethics Paper (2 Papers)ETH 321 Week 2 Team Assignment Torts And Ethics Presentation (2 PPT)ETH 321 Week 2 knowledge CheckETH 321 Week 3 Individual Assignment Business Forms Worksheet (2 Sheet)ETH 321 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Contract Clause & Intellectual Property Drafting Paper (3 Papers)ETH 321 Week 3 knowledge CheckETH 321 Week 4 Individual Assignment Sarbanes-Oxley And Corporate Governance Paper (2 Papers)ETH 321 Week 4 Learning Team Assignment Administrative Agencies Presentation (3 PPT)ETH 321 Week 4 knowledge CheckETH 321 Week 5 Team Assignment Roles of State or Federal Administrative Agencies PresentationETH 321 Week 5 Learning Team Assignment Employment Law Case Brief And Presentation (3 Presentation)ETH 321 Week 5 Individual Assignment Discrimination And Employment Laws (2 Papers)ETH 321 Week 5 Knowledge Check

More people investigating the facts stopped trusting Hilary. Some of her actions were short sighted and put national security at risk, other actions of convenience put innocent victims at risk, others actions were dishonest, other statement were proven to be lies and some management decisions were wrong, derelict. Yet she was never brought to trial or public oversight because of the Clinton Power. No one likes a person who thinks and acts like it’s above the law. Here are six illustrations to conceal, destroy, secrete, submerge facts [the Clinton Power]:lying and signing "clearly false" affidavitsIn a combative exchange at a hearing Friday in Washington, D.C., a federal judge unabashedly accused career State Department officials of lying and signing "clearly false" affidavits to derail a series of lawsuits seeking information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's private email server and her handling of the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. [Clinton Power]U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth said he was "shocked" and "dumbfounded" when he learned that FBI had granted immunity to former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills during its investigation into the use of Clinton's server, according to a court transcript of his remarks. [Clinton Power]"I had myself found that Cheryl Mills had committed perjury and lied under oath in a published opinion I had issued in a Judicial Watch case where I found her unworthy of belief, and I was quite shocked to find out she had been given immunity in — by the Justice Department in the Hillary Clinton email case," Lamberth said during Friday's hearing. [Clinton Power]The Department of Justice's Inspector General (IG), Michael Horowitz, noted in a bombshell reporting June that it was "inconsistent with typical investigative strategy" for the FBI to allow Mills to sit in during the agency's interview of Clinton during the email probe, given that classified information traveled through Mills' personal email account. "[T]here are serious potential ramifications when one witness attends another witness' interview," the IG wrote. [Clinton Power]Mills was wrongly allowed to act as if she were Hillary Clinton's lawyer."It was clear to me that at the time that I ruled initially, that false statements were made to me by career State Department officials, and it became more clear through discovery that the information that I was provided was clearly false regarding the adequacy of the search and this – what we now know turned out to be the Secretary’s email system," Lamberth said Friday.Of course it was. And there have been no consequences.Mills was at best, a material witness, and at worst, a co-conspirator. She was not Hillary's attorney while at State, and was not even employed as an attorney. She was employed as a staff advisor and was therefore a witness. Consequently, she could not be permitted to claim Attorney-client privilege during her time at State and could not serve as Hillary's attorney during an investigation into their collective actions at State and thereafter.Even if Mills had been a State Department attorney, her "client" would have been the Executive Branch, not the Secretary in her personal or legal capacity.This is Legal Ethics 101. It's not even a close call. [Clinton Power]That the Obama FBI and Obama DOJ ignored these principles and also agreed to destroy Mills' laptop is clear evidence of the fix and cover-up.12 years old Raped, Clinton gets rapist offThe Daily Beast ran an interview with a woman who had been raped and beaten into a coma when she was 12 years old. The incident left her unable to have children.The man who did it was set free by Hillary Clinton, an incident that she recounted with sociopathic glee while laughing about her client failing a lie detector test.The woman, raped once by her attackers and again by Hillary Clinton's manipulation of the justice system, was angry at Hillary, not only because Hillary Clinton had saved the man who raped her from prison, but because Hillary Clinton had called her a liar who sought ought attention from older men who often made up stories.Hillary Clinton was the one who was actually lying, as millions of Americans have since found out. “Hillary Clinton took me through Hell,” the victim said. “You are supposed to be for women? You call that [being] for women, what you done to me? And I hear you on tape laughing.” “How many other lies has she told to get where she’s at today? If she becomes president, is she gonna be telling the world the truth? No.”June 20, 2014 Daniel Greenfieldflip-flops stances on IsraelSimply put, we never know how she feels about this topic. Hillary Clinton was against Israel before she was for Israel before she was against Israel. And now she’s for Israel again. Uniquely, Hillary Clinton has so many flip-flops that you need a flow chart to get a handle on her positions as First Lady, Senator, Presidential Candidate I, Secretary of State and Presidential Candidate II. John Kerry had a shelf of flip-flops. Hillary Clinton has an entire closet full of flip-flops in different shades of stomach-turning fevered fuchsia, power pink and oligarch orange.At AIPAC [The American Israel Public Affairs Committee], Hillary Clinton delivered a very nice speech that someone else wrote for her. That’s usually what AIPAC is for. It’s where any politician can read off a pro-Israel speech from a teleprompter without believing a word of it. And no one is better at blankly reading things they don’t believe than Hillary.After having claimed to be Obama’s “designated yeller” at Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, she told the crowd at AIPAC, “One of the first things I’ll do in office is invite the Israeli prime minister to visit the White House.” I’m sure Netanyahu can’t wait for that and for his next dental checkup.Hillary Clinton mentioned the murder of Taylor Force, an Iraq War veteran in Israel, and her speechwriter quite correctly noted that, “Palestinian leaders need to stop inciting violence, stop celebrating terrorists as martyrs and stop paying rewards to their families.” If only Hillary Clinton had been Secretary of State. She might have been able to do something about it.March 22, 2016 Daniel GreenfieldPrivate Email Server deleted, 2,079 were classifiedNever in American history has anyone as unfit and undeserving as Hillary Clinton run for U.S. President. While she stands on the threshold of being elected to the White House, she quite literally belongs in a prison cell. This article lays out the case against her, chapter and verse.Throughout her entire four-year tenure as secretary of state, Mrs. Clinton never acquired or used a government email account. Instead, she transmitted — in violation of government regulations — all of her official correspondences via a private email address that traced back to a secret, private, unsecured server that was housed at her New York residence. And immediately after those emails were subpoenaed by Congress, Clinton instructed a team of her advisers to unilaterally delete, with no oversight, almost 32,000 of the roughly 60,000 emails in question.Clinton claimed that her reason for having used only a personal email account, rather than both a personal and a government account, was that she found it “easier,” “better,” “simpler” and more convenient to “carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails instead of two.” It was eventually learned, however, that Mrs. Clinton in fact had used no fewer than 13 mobile devices to access emails on her private server, but the FBI was unable to obtain any of those devices in its investigation, in some cases because Clinton aides had been instructed to smash them with a hammer.Clinton originally assured Americans that “not even one piece of classified material had ever been transmitted via her unsecured, secret, personal server.” But now it is known that at least 2,079 emails that she sent or received via that server, contained classified material. As the eminent broadcaster and legal scholar Mark Levin has made plain, each of those 2,079 offenses constituted a felonious violation of Section 793 of the Espionage Act.6. And each violation was punishable by a prison sentence of up to ten years. In January 2016, former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said “the odds are pretty high” that Russia, China, and Iran had compromised Clinton's unsecured email server. [Clinton Power]October 14, 2016 John PerazzoThe Clinton Foundation ScandalsIn an effort to prevent foreign governments, organizations, and individuals from influencing the policy decisions of American national leaders, campaign-finance laws prohibit U.S. political figures from accepting money from foreign sources. But as the Washington Post noted in February 2015, the Bill, Hillary, & Chelsea Clinton Foundation “has given donors a way to potentially gain favor with the Clintons outside the traditional political [donation] limits.”.As of February 2015, foreign sources accounted for about one-third of all donors who had given the Clinton Foundation more than $1 million, and over half of those who had contributed more than $5 million.10 Foreign donors that gave money to the Foundation included: Hezbollah supporter Issam Fares, who once served as deputy prime minister of Lebanon; the Dubai Foundation, which also gave money to the families of Palestinian terrorists killed in action; the royal family of the United Arab Emirates; a Dubai-based company that promotes Sharia Law; a privately-held Chinese construction and trade conglomerate headed by a delegate of the Chinese parliament; and the governments of Saudi Arabia, Brunei, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar.Even during Clinton's tenure (2009-13) as secretary of state, the Clinton Foundation received millions of dollars in donations from seven foreign governments.Bill Clinton earned a total of $48 million from foreign sources for his appearance and speaking fees during his wife’s term as secretary.DonationsIn August 2016, the Associated Press reported that 85 of Hillary Clinton's 154 scheduled meetings and phone calls with non-governmental personnel during her time at the State Department were with donors who gave $156 million to the Clinton Foundation. The AP report also revealed that the Clinton Foundation had received $170 million in donations from at least 16 foreign governments whose representatives met personally with Mrs. Clinton.In May 2015, the International Business Times reported that the Clinton State Department had approved billions of dollars in arms deals with governments that donated to the Clinton Foundation, including governments that were infamous for their appalling human-rights records.But the Clinton Foundation certainly does many wonderful things for needy people around the world, doesn't it? Well, according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist, between 2009-12 the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million in total. A mere 15% of that went towards programmatic grants. The other $425 Million went to travel expenses, employee salaries and benefits, and “other expenses.” In 2013, the Clinton Foundation allocated only 6% of its revenues to direct charitable aid.Clinton's Support for the Iran Nuclear DealVowing that Mrs. Clinton will “preven[t] Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon,” the Clinton presidential campaign website assures Americans that “Hillary will vigorously enforce the nuclear agreement with Iran.” Is this a good thing? Consider that the agreement's key provisions were as follows:Iran was permitted to keep more than 5,000 centrifuges for nuclear efforts.Iran received $150 billion in sanctions relief.Sanctions would be lifted on critical parts of Iran’s military.Russia and China were permitted to supply Iran with weapons.Iran was given the discretion to block international inspectors from its military installations, and was promised that it would receive 14 days’ notice for any request to visit a given site.Iran's intercontinental ballistic missile program would remain intact.Iran was not required to release American prisoners whom it was holding on trumped-up charges.Only inspectors from countries that had diplomatic relations with Iran would be given access to Iranian nuclear sites; thus there would be no American inspectors.An embargo on the sale of weapons to Iran would be officially lifted in 5 years.The U.S. pledged that it would provide technical assistance to help Iran develop its nuclear program and protect its nuclear facilities, supposedly for peaceful domestic purposes.As a result of this nuclear deal that Mrs. Clinton so enthusiastically supports, Iran is guaranteed of having a near-zero breakout time to a nuclear bomb approximately a decade down the road.(The Congressional Research Service (the nonpartisan analytic arm of Congress) reviewed this cash transfer in a 2018 report. It gave a total of $1.7 billion. That was the amount that U.S. and Iranian negotiators settled on to resolve an arms contract between the United States and Iran that predated the Iranian revolution in 1979. Iran had paid for military equipment, and it was never delivered. As of 1990, there were $400 million in that account. Negotiators agreed that accrued interest would add $1.3 billion to the amount, which is a lot of money — but 25 years is a long time for interest to build up the balance. )The $1.8 billion is reasonably accurate. The official amount is $1.7 billion. However, there’s no evidence that barrels and boxes were involved.Clinton Helps Russia Gain Control of 20% of All U.S. UraniumIn 2007-08, a Canadian named Ian Telfer, chairman of a South African uranium-mining company called Uranium One, funneled millions of dollars in donations to the Clinton Foundation. In June 2010, the Russian government made an extremely generous offer to Uranium One's shareholders. If the offer were to be accepted, Russia would gain a 51% controlling stake in the company.But because Uranium One controlled one-fifth of all U.S. uranium reserves — and uranium, a key component in both nuclear energy and nuclear weaponry, is considered a strategic asset with implications for American national security — the deal with Russia could not be permitted without the approval of the American government. Specifically, that approval could be granted only by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which is composed of several of the most powerful members of the cabinet — the Attorney General as well as the Secretaries of Defense, Commerce, Treasury, Homeland Security, Energy, and State. (The latter, of course, was Hillary Clinton.)Without the approval of these seven Obama administration officials, Russia's acquisition of Uranium One could not have taken place. All seven, including Hillary Clinton, gave their go-ahead for the deal. As a result, the Russian government took control of fully 20% of all uranium production capacity in the United States.In June 2010 — the very month in which the Russian acquisition of Uranium One was approved by the CFIUS — Bill Clinton was invited to speak in Moscow for the astronomical sum of $500,000. Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin personally thanked Mr. Clinton for speaking. And Mr. Clinton's speaking fee was paid by Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin.But hey, who cares? At least Hillary Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she deeply respects women, including the countless millions whose safety has been placed in jeopardy by permitting American uranium to be gobbled up by a hostile, fascist Russia.The Radical Islamist Affiliations of Clinton's Closest AideHillary Clinton's closest aide for many years has been Huma Abedin, whose late father, Syed Abedin, was affiliated with the Muslim Students Association (MSA). The MSA grew out of the jihadist Muslim Brotherhood, which Islam expert Robert Spencer has described as “the parent organization of Hamas and al Qaeda.”Huma's mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin, is a prominent member of the Muslim Sisterhood — the Muslim Brotherhood's division for women. She is also a board member of the International Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief, a pro-Hamas entity that is part of the “Union of Good,” which the U.S. government has formally designated as an international terrorist organization. Saleha once wrote an article blaming America for having provoked the Islamic “anger and hostility” that led to the 9/11 attacks.35From 1996-2008, Huma Abedin was employed by the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA), a Saudi-based Islamic think tank founded by Abdullah Omar Naseef, a major Muslim Brotherhood figure who once served as secretary-general of the Muslim World League, a vehicle by which the Muslim Brotherhood promotes the ideology of Islamic supremacism. Naseef also had ties to Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda, with whom he communicated.36 Abedin was the assistant editor of IMMA's in-house publication, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA). At least the first seven of those years overlapped with Abdullah Omar Naseef's active presence in the IMMA.It is vital to note that the IMMA's “Muslim Minority Affairs” agenda was, and remains to this day, a calculated foreign policy of the Saudi Ministry of Religious Affairs. It is designed, as former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy explains, “to grow an unassimilated, aggressive population of Islamic supremacists who will gradually but dramatically alter the character of the West.”But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she respects women, including the hundreds of millions of women in Muslim nations who are oppressed by the very same Sharia Law that is promoted by the organization to which Huma Abedin devoted 12 years of her life.The Deadly Consequences of Clinton's Absurd Fictions About Islam & TerrorismFunny thing...there are no Baptist Bombers or Transententalist Terrorists. Only islam produces believers withIn 2011 the Obama administration, in which Mrs. Clinton was obviously a major player, decided to purge, from the training materials and curricula of all federal intelligence and criminal investigators, every single item suggesting that “jihad” or “Islam” were in any way related to terrorism. Instead, the new objective would be “countering violent extremism,” improving “cultural competency training across the United States Government,” and promoting “cultural awareness.” All told, the FBI removed more than 1,000 presentations and curriculum items that were deemed “offensive” or “Islamophobic.”The FBI's decision to change its training materials and interrogation methods went on to have deadly serious, real-world consequences. A particularly noteworthy case involved jihadist Omar Mateen, who in June 2016 entered a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida and murdered 49 people while wounding 53 others. The FBI had investigated Mateen extensively for 10 months in 2013 because he had family connections to Al Qaeda, he was a member of a Shi’a terrorist organization, and he had issued terroristic threats on a number of occasions. But eventually, the FBI canceled that investigation because, in accordance with the tenets of its revised training materials, it concluded that Mateen posed no threat to anyone; that his biggest problem was the psychic pain he was suffering as a result of “being marginalized because of his Muslim faith.” As a result of this absurd line of reasoning, 49 innocent people from Orlando are now lying in their graves.Hillary Clinton agrees completely with the notion that it is both counterproductive and morally unjustified to suggest any connection between Islam and terrorism — the same delusional, preposterous mentality that enabled the Orlando mass murder to take place.But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she deeply respects women and homosexuals, including the 49 people who were slaughtered in the Orlando nightclub.Clinton's Role in the Rise of ISISISIS, which evolved out of Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), grew into the most powerful, well-funded horde of bloodthirsty barbarians in world history, right under Mrs. Clinton's nose, and precisely during her watch as secretary of state. While ISIS launched its campaign of mass rapes, beheadings, slaughters, and tortures of unimaginable brutality — and gained control over enormous portions of Iraq and Syria — Clinton and President Obama did absolutely nothing to thwart it.Moreover, the rise of ISIS coincided with the expansion of terrorism to unprecedented levels all over the world. According to the Global Terrorism Index, fatalities caused by terrorism increased from 3,361 in 2000, to 11,133 in 2012, to 18,111 in 2013, to 32,658 in 2014. More than half of the 2014 killings were carried out by ISIS and Boko Haram, the latter of which has pledged allegiance to ISIS.44 In other words, worldwide terrorism has spiraled out of control under Obama, Clinton, and Clinton's successor, John Kerry.But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she deeply respects women everywhere, including the many thousands who are killed by terrorists across the globe each year.Clinton's Empty Talk Regarding Russia and ChinaHillary Clinton's presidential campaign website boasts that in 2010 Clinton “worked to ensure ratification of the New START treaty, which will make the world safer by reducing U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals to their smallest size in 50 years.”The New START agreement with Russia limited each country's long-range nuclear weapons stockpile to 1,500. But while both the U.S. and Russia agreed to these limits, only America promised to freeze its technology. As the late constitutional scholar Phyllis Schlafley wrote of the treaty:“It reads like it was written by the Russians and has nothing good in it for the United States.... The treaty allows Russia to build new and modern weapons to reach New START limits, whereas the United States is locked into reducing its current number. That means Russia will have new and tested weapons, but the U.S. will be stuck with its current, out-of-date, untested warheads.... This treaty gives Russia a veto over all U.S. defenses against incoming missiles.... Russia explained that ... it will stick with New START 'only if the (U.S.) refrains from developing its missile defense capabilities quantitatively or qualitatively.'”Immigration: Clinton Explicitly Favors Amnesty, Sanctuary Cities, and “Open BordersEntering your neighbors house un-invited is wrong, impolite and can get you shot as a trespasser in some states. Entering a country that you are not a citizen of is criminal whether you sneak across the boarder on-a bus, a plane or on foot.“Hillary will introduce comprehensive immigration reform with a pathway to full and equal citizenship within her first 100 days in office,” says the Clinton presidential campaign website. Mrs. Clinton pledges that if she is elected president, she will extend President Obama's two major executive orders on immigration, which protected millions of illegal aliens from deportation. She vows to do this despite the fact that Obama himself, prior to issuing his executive orders, frequently acknowledged that such actions went far beyond the proper limits of presidential authority. Speaking to a group of illegal immigrant high-school students in 2015, Clinton said: “I want to do everything we can to defend the president's executive orders ... As president I would do everything possible under the law to go even further.”Moreover, Mrs. Clinton unequivocally supports the “sanctuary” policies that bar police and other public-sector employees in some 340 U.S. cities from notifying the federal government about the presence of illegal aliens residing in their communities. As such, these policies defy the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act that Congress passed twenty years ago to require that local governments cooperate with U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE).Sanctuary policies have turned hundreds of U.S. cities into very dangerous places. Of the 9,295 deportable aliens who were released after their arrest in sanctuary jurisdictions during the first eight months of 2014 alone, some 2,320 were subsequently re-arrested, on new criminal charges, soon thereafter. And before their initial release, 58% of those 9,295 aliens already had felony charges or convictions on their records, while another 37% had serious prior misdemeanor charges.But Mrs. Clinton's commitment to sanctuary policies is unshakable. As Xochitl Hinojosa, the Clinton presidential campaign's director of coalitions press, said in 2015: “Hillary Clinton believes that sanctuary cities can help further public safety, and she has defended those policies going back years.”In a speech she delivered at Banco Itau, a Brazilian bank, on May 16, 2013, Mrs. Clinton stated: “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders....”Rejecting School Vouchers for Failing Urban SchoolsTry being a poor parent, living in a poor area, with terrible schools. You want your kids to get a better education so you opt for vouchers as a reach for an better life for your kids. Anyone against vouchers in this situation is a social malefactor.Professing to have spent her entire adult life “fighting for children,” Hillary Clinton dogmatically opposes the implementation of school voucher programs which would enable the parents of low-income, mostly-minority children who attend failing, inner-city public schools, to send their youngsters instead to private schools where they might actually have a chance of succeeding academically. Why would anyone reject such programs, if he or she actually cared about poor minority kids?As always, if you want to find out what motivates Mrs. Clinton, you have to follow the money. Together, the two largest teachers' unions in the United States — the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) — have given tens of millions of dollars in campaign contributions to political candidates since the early 1990s, and more than 95% of that money has gone to Democrats. If we also count the massive expenditures that teachers' unions make on politically oriented initiatives like television ads and get-out-the-vote efforts, the numbers become almost unfathomable. From 2007-12, the NEA and AFT together spent more than $330 million to influence elections in favor of Democrats.The leading objective of both the NEA and AFT is to maximize employment opportunities for dues-paying members of their unions. This is highly significant because mandatory dues constitute the very lifeblood of those unions. And voucher programs, which would siphon students as well as money away from the public schools, don't promote union membership or union dues.So Hillary Clinton rejects voucher programs because her union benefactors oppose them. But hey, who cares? At least she never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she deeply respects women — even impoverished, inner-city minority women who have no choice but to send their children to public schools that are beset by academic failure and violence of monumental proportions.Fighting Voter ID Laws As “Racist”At an August 2013 meeting of the American Bar Association, Mrs. Clinton lamented that “more than 80 bills restricting voting rights” had been “introduced in 31 states” during the first eight months of that year. These were generally bills that sought to institute Voter ID requirements at polling places, shorten early-voting periods, eliminate same-day voter registration, prevent the arbitrary extension of voting hours, and carefully regulate the use of absentee voting. All of these proposed measures were designed to reduce the likelihood of voter fraud, but Mrs. Clinton called them “voter suppression” efforts that were part of a racist scheme to “disproportionately [disenfranchise] African-Americans, Latino[s] and young voters.”110 On another occasion, Clinton said that Voter ID laws are emblematic of a racist form of “fear-mongering about a phantom epidemic of election fraud.”Is Mrs. Clinton correct? Look at the evidence and decide for yourself:A 2012 report by the Pew Center on the States found that 24 million voter registrations — one-eighth of all registrations nationwide — were either invalid or inaccurate, including more than 1.8 million dead people who were still registered.A 2014 study found that two years earlier, some 155,692 registered voters in North Carolina alone had first and last names, birth dates, and final-four Social Security Number digits that matched those of voters who were registered in other states.The same study also found that 35,570 people who had actually voted in North Carolina, had first names, last names, and birth dates that matched those of voters who had cast ballots in other states.In 2008, Democrat Al Franken won a highly controversial U.S. Senate race in Minnesota by just 312 votes. It was later discovered that 1,099 felons — all legally ineligible to vote — had cast ballots in the election, almost exclusively for Franken.Clinton's Affiliation with Al Sharpton & Black Lives MatterAl Sharpton has been called a Race Hustler. In April 2007, Mrs. Clinton spoke at an event held by Al Sharpton's National Action Network, where she stated that her own presidential bid was possible only because of the dedicated work of longtime civil-rights leaders who, like Sharpton, had fought on behalf of those traditionally excluded from power positions in American life. “I have enjoyed a long and positive relationship with Reverend Al Sharpton and National Action Network,” said Clinton, “and I don't ever remember saying 'no' to them, and I intend to remain their partner in civil rights as I clean the dirt from under the carpet in the Oval Office when I am elected President.”And nothing whatsoever has changed in Mrs. Clinton's estimation of Sharpton, perhaps the most repugnant racial arsonist in contemporary America, in the years since then. In April 2016, for instance, Clinton again spoke at a National Action Network event where she lauded Sharpton and his organization for steadfastly working “on the frontlines of our nation’s continuing struggle for civil rights,” and “in a million ways lift[ing] up voices that too often go unheard.”Speaking of repugnant racial arsonists, in August 2015 Mrs. Clinton held an impromptu, videotaped conversation with three Black Lives Matter (BLM) activists who were complaining about the “mass incarceration” of African Americans. In response to them, Clinton said: “This country has still not recovered from its original sin [slavery] ... Your analysis is totally fair. It's historically fair, it's psychologically fair, it's economically fair.... All I'm suggesting is, even for us sinners [white people], find some common ground on agendas that can make a difference right here and now in people's lives.”Clinton's Personal Persecution of a Young Rape VictimWhile the Clinton presidential campaign website touts “Hillary’s plan to end campus sexual assault,” it laments that “many who choose to report sexual assault in the criminal justice system fear that their voices will be dismissed instead of heard.”130 But Mrs. Clinton herself took part in one of the most repulsive exhibitions of cruelty to a rape victim ever seen in an American courtroom.The year was 1975, and attorney Hillary Clinton was defending Thomas Alfred Taylor, a 41-year-old man accused of raping and beating a 12-year-old girl named Kathy Shelton. So brutal was Taylor's assault, that the victim spent five days in a coma immediately afterward; then several months recovering from the physical thrashing that accompanied the rape; plus, more than 10 years in psychotherapy.Mrs. Clinton knew for certain that Taylor was guilty of this crime, as she made clear years later when she discussed the case in a 1980s interview with Arkansas journalist Roy Reed. “He [Taylor] took a lie detector test!” Mrs. Clinton recalled. “I had him take a polygraph test, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs.”Notwithstanding her certitude regarding the man's guilt, Clinton negotiated a plea bargain for Taylor by taking advantage of a prosecutorial error — the prosecutors had cut out and examined the blood-covered section of Taylor's underwear that proved his guilt, but then discarded the fabric, making it impossible for the defense to examine it. Because of this misstep, Clinton, confident that the prosecution would be unable to prove Taylor's guilt, pushed for a plea bargain.In the aforementioned 1980s interview, Mrs. Clinton laughed as she recounted how the polygraph results were clearly erroneous, and how a forensic scientist from New York was prepared to testify that Taylor could not be convicted if the underwear fabric was no longer available. When Reed asked Clinton about the outcome of the case, she replied, nonchalantly, “Oh he plea bargained. Got him off with time served in the county jail, he’d been in the county jail about two months.”Subsequent to the Taylor trial, a Newsday examination of court files and investigative files revealed that Mrs. Clinton had also attacked the young victim's character during the trial by calling into question her motives, her honesty, her temperament, and her ability to perceive reality — even though she knew with 100% certainty that her client was guilty.But hey, who cares? At least Mrs. Clinton, a great actress, never engaged in crude, private trash talk that was recorded on tape. And all of her disparaging, condescending, hate-soaked, fiction-laced denunciations of her political rivals are delivered in measured, solemn, well-rehearsed tones. And she deeply respects women, including the scores of millions of women in the U.S., Israel, and elsewhere, whose very lives have been placed in irreversible peril as a result of this pass by law enforcement. She is a phony that some people, the folks that look and read and understand, can see. She represented the swamp.