Retired Employee Statement Concerning Application: Fill & Download for Free

It's obvious you are going to be a Manager one day …I am working as a BM in charge of a Regional Rural Bank Branch. Considering that every job has different kind of pressure/responsibility but public dealing job is a hell kind of and if you get posted in rural area then you are gone..One thing more that you will be get transferred as In-charge of a branch after just finishing your probation period or earlier as most of the seniors (95%) got retired and rest 5% will retire in less than 3 or 4 years. Even one of my friend in UBI is working as In-charge as a single officer and with 2 Office Assistant, you can't imagin his situation or working in a bank being scale 1 single officer in a scale 3 branch , it's more than hell.Jobs of banker (Collected from somewhere and saved carefully in my phone that I can glance at the end of each month to check whether any work left):1. Lok Adalats2. ATM management3. Clearing4. Pension disbursement5. Death claims6. Complaints7. Filing recovery suits8. Filing EPs9. RTI applications10. Fresh NPA investigation11. QMC investigation12. CERSAI registration13. SARFAESI action14. Taking Possession15. Fraud reports16. Seizure of moveables17. Auctioning of seized items18. Auctioning of jewels19. Agriculture loans20. OTS settlements21. SB account activations22. Current accounts23. LIC policies24. OD facilities25. PPF accounts26. E-KYC27. NRI customers28. Product marketing29. Jewel loans30. Mobile banking31. Net-banking32. Corporate Banking33. Housing loans34. Vehicle loans35. Educational loans36. Compliance to RO/HO37. Advocates review38. Valuers review39. Seizure agents review40. Jewel appraisers review41. Bank Adalats42. TDS/tax management43. Cash management44. Empaneling advocates45. Empaneling valuers46. Empaneling seizure agents47. Empaneling jewel appraisers48. Audit reports49. Quarter end reports50. Year end reports51 De duplication52 Self Audit53 Jandhan yojana54 Mudra Loan55 General Insurance56 aadhaar seeding57 fasal bima yojana58 stand up India59 pmjby60 pmsby61. Net banking failure.62. ATM failed txn.63. Maintaining records of ECS return.64. Soil notes n pre 2005 notes return65. Repairing of passbook printng kiosk67. Coin vending machine68. Note acceptor/ cash deposit kiosk.69. Responsiblity rectify Failure link.70. msbhv from Customer71. Reply on unnecessary queries like Where does my ECS amount go, why atm hotlisting charged debited..72 ishan uday scholarship73. RGNF scholarship74 single girl child75 Locker SERVICE76 ugc net77 ugc ctet78. stock statement79. Filling up deposit and withdrawal slips of illiterate customers80 banker account balancing81. Phn service/ mail service to customers82. Compliance report83 cash remittances84 pre sanctions visit85 post sanctions visit86 writing GC in 3 Slips87.Ghar ghar dastak. ###### Modhur milan..88. cctv not working89. Electricity bill of office not received90. Replying Explanatory Letter to HRMS91. Following up of complaint lodged by making calls in regular intervals92. Maintaining cheque return register....93. Cleaning of selves in your table jamed by ur xxx94. Signature scanning95. Loging complaint for not allowing to modify like DOB. N chk ready made reply "please contact concerned section..".96. Giving clarification to fellow colleagues that what we want to to say97. LPG n related queries98. Remembering passwords99. Why bank cant issue pan card?100. Removing pins stuck in the keyboardAnd while doing all this, when a branch employee is not able to read emails from head office, they would call and shout, "you can't even read a mail, what the hell are you doing there sitting in branch.?!!"Employee :"Yaar main kya karoon

What exactly is changing in the current bill?As per the Prevention of Corruption Act, if a Court wants start a legal proceeding against any government officer, then the sanction of the government is needed. This is applicable for Central Government employees and also State Government employees. This is already existing in the lawNow, an amendment is being brought which says that sanction of the government is needed in case of former employees also. That is, is someone was a public servant earlier, and is now retired, the courts will need a sanction from the government before initiating any proceeding against him. This is applicable only if the bribe was taken when he was actually working.Hence, the change is that former employees are being covered by the new amendment which is brought into the picture.Why is this amendment being made?Let us first read the government’s official statement about this (emphasis added):The Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Bill, 2008 had proposed an amendment to section 19 of the Act on the lines of section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for extending protection of prior sanction of the Government or competent authority after retirement or demittance of office by a public servant so as to provide a safeguard to a public servant from vexatious prosecution for any bona-fide omission or commission in the discharge of his official duties.SourceHere are the reasons the government has given:This provision is in line with Code of Criminal Procedures, which also says the same thing - that for prosecuting against a public servant, prior permission of the relevant government is needed.Intention of this provision is to “provide a safeguard to a public servant from vexatious prosecution”. This means that public servants might become wary of performing their duties if they live in a fear that wrong charges can be filed against them. By giving this protection, the government is assuring their employees that no malicious cases will be filed against them. They can freely perform their duties, without living in a fear that other people can file wrong charges against them.The concerned amendment only says that this protection will be applicable even after you retire. Hence, don’t worry about any malicious (or wrong) case against you: go ahead and perform your duties without worrying about that, even after your retirement.Is this protection really important?Another question that you might want to ask is whether this protection really is important in the first place. If a public servant is charged with corruption, why does the court need to have the government’s permission to run charges against him?There are some arguments made in support of this:This provision covers only those employees who cannot be fired before the government’s permission. Hence, we are talking about important positions only.In deciding whether the case should be charged against the public servant, the government and court will keep in mind whether he was performing his official duties or not. There have been many judgments of the Supreme Court[1] and other courts which claim that acceptance of bribe calls for prosecution.Will this lead to any misuse?It is natural to think that such a protection against government employees could be misused. Many corrupt officials can claim that no charges can be filed against them unless previously sanctioned by the government. The Supreme Court noted that[2]in many cases, this provision was used as a shield by corrupt officials.As soon as any compliant was filed against the officer, he would claim protection under the relevant section, saying that he cannot be prosecuted against unless a previous sanction is taken from the government.The Supreme Court said that this sanction must be interpreted to “advance the causes of honesty and justice” and good governance as opposed to escalation of corruption.How should we interpret this provision?Supreme Court has ruled many times on this provision, saying following things[3]:This protection cannot be claimed by default. It was only available to be invoked in cases where the government officer was honestly discharging his duty.Protection cannot be claimed immediately after the compliant. The question of prior sanction would be considered during the proceedings, if needed.Whether or not such a sanction is needed would be determined on case to case basis. There cannot be a universal shield.It therefore means that we should interpret this law in it’s spirit, not just by mere words. The point of this provision is that public officials should be encouraged to perform their duty without the fear of malicious prosecution. It does not mean that all public officials can, by default, be allowed to walk scot-free from any prosecution.Does this have anything to do with demonetisation?I am including this because the question description asks whether it has anything at all to do with demonetisation. The answer is - nothing at all. This amendment was being talked about since 2013 only, and it already covered the existing employees. Where is the question of demonetisation here?Just because two things happen around the same time does not mean they are related. Also, this has nothing to do with Modi government at all because such a provision already existed in the law before the current government came into picture.Hope this detailed answer would help you to read the amendment in the relevant context.Footnotes[1] http://www.manupatra.com/roundup/329/Articles/Sanctions.pdf[2] ‘Not a shield for corrupt officials’[3] Protection only for honest public servants: apex court

Yes, as noted by other answers, military members may simultaneously serve as “public officials” either elected or appointed…if they are in the Reserve Component and abide by the rules about political work while using the military affiliation for gain.With the rarest exceptions, Regular Component servicemembers (officer or enlisted) cannot so serve. A Regular Component SM can be “seconded” or “detailed” (take your pick of the terminology) to another Federal Agency for specific tasks, such as working for the Selective Service Administratio, etc., but that is not the same thing as the original question. (Just adding color to the answer).There are specific rules that govern something called the “Key Employer” program. It is governed by US law, and implemented across all the DoD components through DoD Directive 1200.7, Screening the Ready Reserve. See: http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/120007p.pdfThis Directive tasks all reserve commanders with continuously screening their personnel for a variety of information, mostly concerned with “how do we contact you, do you have a family, how do we contact them, are you still mentally/morally/physically fit for duty if we recall you to active service, and are you working for a private/civilian employer, or governmental agency, that has designed you as a “key employer.”E3.3.1. Each Ready Reservist who is not a member of the Selected Reserve is obligated to notify the Secretary concerned of any change of address, marital status, number of dependents, or civilian employment and any other change that would prevent a member from meeting mobilization standards prescribed by the Military Service concerned (10 U.S.C. 10205, reference (b)).Here is a backgrounder: LAW REVIEW 181A Key Position/Employee is: a Federal position that shall not be vacated during a national emergency or mobilization without SERIOUSLY impairing the capability of the parent Federal Agency or office to function effectively.See these paragraphs of ENCLOSURE 2, DoDD 1200.7, November 18, 1999:E2.1.3. Key Employee. Any Federal employee occupying a key position.E2.1.4. Key Position. A Federal position that shall not be vacated during a national emergency or mobilization without SERIOUSLY impairing the capability of the parent Federal Agency or office to function effectively. The four categories of Federal key positions are set out below. The first three categories are, by definition, key positions. However, the third category, Article III Judges, provides for exceptions on a case-by-case basis. The fourth category requires a case-by-case determination and designation as described below.E2.1.4.1. The Vice President of the United States or any official specified in the order of presidential succession as in 3 U.S.C. 19 (reference (h)).E2.1.4.2. The members of the Congress and the Heads of the Federal Agencies appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate. For this Directive, the term "the Heads of the Federal Agencies" does not-include any person appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate to a Federal Agency as a member of a multi-member board or commission. Such positions may be designated as key positions only IAW subparagraph E2.1.4.4., below.E2.1.4.3. Article III Judges. However, each Article III Judge, who is a member of the Ready Reserve and desires to remain in the Ready Reserve, must have his or her position reviewed by the Chief Judge of the affected Judge's Circuit. If the Chief Judge determines that mobilization of the Article III Judge concerned will not seriously impair the capability of the Judge's court to function effectively, the Chief Judge will provide a certification to that effect to the Secretary of the Military Department concerned. Concurrently, the affected Judge will provide a statement to the Secretary concerned requesting continued service in the Ready Reserve and acknowledging that he or she may be involuntarily called to AD under the laws of the United States and the Directives and Regulations of the Department of Defense and pledging not to seek to be excused from such orders based upon his or her judicial duties.E2.1.4.4. Other Federal positions determined by the Federal Agency Heads, or their designees, to be key positions IAW the guidelines in enclosure 3.The Reserve Component has layers of readiness:The Ready Reserve — those reservists who are most ready to deploy. (This category has a wide variety of flavors…some of these reservists are indeed ready to deploy at a moment’s notice, others cannot deploy if they wanted to, and some cannot even be found if needed…)Selected Reserve — organized, trained, ready to deploy at short notice. Either organized units, or individuals assigned to fill augmentation billets on various active duty organizations or other areas of Government. The majority of these are in reserve units within either the reserves or the National Guard. This category includes the various Full Time Support servicemembers, variously known as “Active Guard and Reserve,” “Active Reserve,” “Full Time Support,” and “Reserve Program Administrators.” FTS SelRes servicemembers are reservists who are chosen to serve on active duty for periods of time up to and including a full active duty pension for 20+ years of active duty…but they remain SELRES reservists for the duration of their FTS service, and their duties are largely confined to the requirements of 10 USC 12310: Organize, Train, Equip the Reserves.Individual Ready Reserve — individual reservists who are not assigned to any unit. They are required to maintain the minimum screening requirements listed in DoD Directive 1200.7 and Service-specific screenings, their uniforms, and remain subject to recall to active duty until they have completed either their 8-year initial contract Military Service Obligation, or their enlistment contract (if they reenlisted beyond their 8 year MSO as a reservist). Officers are not immediately discharged at the 8-year MSO; they must take affirmative action to request resignation of their commission, or they remain in the reserve component until a future screening action fails in their case and they become subject to administrative actions that may result in discharge at that time (usually by year 10, i.e., 2 years beyond their MSO, they have been identified by their Service as “nonparticipants” and the screening actions begin to remove them and their commissions).Standby Reserve — reservists who for whatever reason either cannot remain, or ask to be removed, from the Ready Reserve but wish to remain “in the reserves,” i.e., they can still be recalled for active duty, but only in severe manpower shortages or if they have a very special skill that is required.Active Status List — members of the Key Employee list, and others deemed worthy of remaining in the Active Status due to their skills, knowledge, experience, etc. Those on the ASL can still participate in reserve activities, but they cannot join reserve units, cannot earn pay, but can earn retirement points, can request retirement, earn credit toward pay status and seniority in grade, and can still compete for and be promoted. If they are recalled to active duty in an national emergency, they will be restored to a status that allows them to earn pay, of course.Inactive Status List — those reservists who for whatever reason, have some type of special skill that the Services have determined should remain available in the event of a national emergency. They remain in the reserves, but at the lowest possible level of readiness, and can only be accessed in a true national emergency when all other options have been used up. Those on the ISL cannot be promoted, cannot be paid, cannot participate in any reserve activities, do not earn credit toward retirement or pay status, but do remain on a contract or commission, and do continue to accrue seniority in grade. If they already had more than 20 years toward retirement, an ISL could request retirement, but if they have less than 20 years they will not be earning any new credit toward retirement.A person can be moved, either by request (if within policy and law), or at the Govt’s discretion, to and from these various categories within the Reserve Component. So a Key Employee who is compelled to remain in the ASL may quit that job, or retire, and then be free to request to transfer back to the Selected Reserve and rejoin a reserve unit, etc. Or vice-versa.EDIT NOTE: Retirees of any sort, whether of the Regular Component, the Reserve Component, or the Fleet Reserve/Fleet Marine Corps Reserve, on any List (Retired List of the Regular or Reserve Component, Permanent or Temporary Disability Retired List, Honorary Retired List), are exempt from the specific screenings of DoD Directive 1200.7, and subject to some specific restrictions, are free to assume “public office” at any level of the federal/state/local subdivision. If they were recalled to active service, they would probably fall into the requirements given above, or specific exemptions would have to be given to them under whatever jurisdictions laws pertain…BOTTOM LINE:By definition, the President, Vice President, and all Federal officials who are in the line of Presidential succession, i.e., Cabinet officials/Heads of Federal Agencies, members of Congress, Article III Federal judges, and any other Federal position that is approved as a “Key Position” under E2.1.4.4, are considered “Key Positions/Key Employees.”As defined in E2.1.4.3, Article III Judges may be permitted to remain in the Ready Reserve if they get the Chief Judge of their Circuit to approve their waiver to their Key Employee designation.Per E3.2.3. All (private) employers who determine that a Ready Reservist is a key employee, IAW the guidelines in this Directive, should promptly report that determination, using the letter format in section E3.4., below, to the applicable Reserve personnel center, requesting the employee be removed from the Ready Reserve.If a servicemember is in the Ready Reserve, and they are in the Federal service, and they meet any of the above conditions, they cannot remain in the Ready Reserve without specific authorization of the Secretary of Defense (and/or other Agency Heads as necessary).They must either be transferred to a job that is NOT designated as Key Position, orThey must be transferred to the Standby Reserve (usually the ASL).If they are retirement-eligible, they may also request retirement in lieu of transfer to the Standby Reserve.If they have completed their MSO, and any other time-in-grade or other Service-specific contractual requirements, an officer may request resignation in lieu of transfer to the Standby Reserve.An enlisted member who does not choose retirement, will be transferred to the Standby Reserve until such time as they have served the remainder of their contractually obligated service time, at which time they will be offered the opportunity to either reenlist in the ASL, or be discharged (or retire if eligible).Any private employer, or State (or any political subdivision thereof) employer, may use the provisions of paragraph E3.2.3. to “determine that a Ready Reservist is a key employee, IAW the guidelines in this Directive, should promptly report that determination, using the letter format in section E3.4., below, to the applicable Reserve personnel center, requesting the employee be removed from the Ready Reserve.”If the private employer or State’s request is approved, the provisions of Key Employer/Key Position as described above will be applied, and they either must be moved to a non-Key Position if they wish to remain in the Ready Reserve, or they must be processed for transfer to the Standby Reserve/retirement/discharge/resignation.Senator Lindsey Graham was an Air Force Reserve Colonel, in the JAG Corps. He visited Afghanistan twice, on official military orders, wearing his Air Force uniform, while I was there. He was, officially, only a colonel lawyer on a 2 week period of duty. But, of course, he was actually treated like the serious VIP he was, and the red carpet was rolled out, briefings provided, etc. Because, he was still a Senator…I do not know if he had obtained a SecDef waiver and remained in the Ready Reserve, or if he was in the ASL of the Standby Reserve. It wouldn’t have mattered, really, because either way he was eligible to have orders to active duty to perform a service (but in the ASL, he wouldn’t get paid…just points toward retirement credit).There are also likely to be many State/lower Govt personnel who might qualify as “key employees,” but their State hasn’t submitted the required request, and nobody will care until the employee is mobilized unexpectedly, and then someone will try to get them declared as a Key Employee and kill their Mob orders…this is why they are supposed to screened annually, to prevent this problem. But, very few requests for Key Positions are approved by SecDef, because the bar is deliberately set high: the function the person serves in the private employer, or civil government, MUST BE MORE IMPORTANT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY/WAR EFFORT if they are NOT mobilized, than what they would contribute if they are mobilized.The deck is stacked in favor of the reservist being mobilized, because after all that’s why they are still in the reserves, right? And what their contract says. And for the vast majority of reservists, their contract with the reserves trumps their civilian employment obligations…unless they are declared a Key Employee under the approval of the SecDef.Examples of more possible Key Employees other than those statutorily listed above:President/CEO of a major defense contractor delivering sensitive components (aviation, major end items, nuclear technology, etc.).Police/Fire Commissioner of a major city, like NYPD or NYFD, with 30,000 officers in a city of 10 million.Certain scientists or managers involved with naval engineering and ship-building, especially involving nuclear submarines or aircraft carriers.The CEO of Ford Motors, or GMC, with hundreds of thousands of employees (and many military contracts, too).Governors of a State/Territory. (And perhaps, if a good case can be made, their Deputy Governors and/or full-time Cabinet officers or Legislators/Supreme Court justices.)A Peace Corps employee.Scientists or other technical professionals working with time-sensitive or irreplaceable materials or projects (NASA, space, genetics, diseases, nanotech, materials engineering, etc.).The Head of Neurosurgery of a major hospital, where he alone is capable of performing specific surgeries that save lives and advance science.Those who will not qualify as Key Employees:Rank and file employees of any business or Govt entity.Nearly any managers, at any level, of a business or Govt entity unless they can overcome the burden that their duties at their job are more valuable to National Security AT THAT JOB THAN IN THE MILITARY.Part-time employees, even State Legislators who only attend periodic legislative sessions.State judges (except possibly at the Supreme Court level of each state).Elected officers like County Sheriffs, Assessors, clerks of the court, etc., unless they can get the SecDef to buy it. (Maybe the Sheriff of Los Angeles County might qualify; he runs thousands of employees over a huge county with millions of residents AND a huge jail system, too.)A final thought: The President isn’t specifically covered by the Key Employee rules. He’s already the Commander in Chief, but NOT a military member. Civilian oversight and control over the military is a FOUNDATIONAL concept of our Republic, since the days of George Washington.Could the President also be a serving servicemember? Or even a retired servicemember (since a retired servicemember is still in the military, and can be recalled to active duty or otherwise serve in a military capacity)?The example of President Eisenhower is instructive:He was a O-11/General of the Army, one of only 10 five-star officers in WWII.He retired from active duty after WWII. However, the law authorizing the 5-stars also stated that they would continue to draw their full pay and allowances for the rest of their life…meaning that in theory they couldn’t retire.Sure, they could (and did) have an official retirement ceremony, get an award, and go home to putter around, all while continuing to draw full pay just as if they were at the office every day.One of the questions surrounding his candidacy for President was whether he was actually retired, or if he would actually be a “still-serving” five-star general officer of the US Army and simultaneously be a civilian Commander in Chief.This was a hard question to answer…so he resolved it by resigning his commission entirely. He left the Army. Completely. With no military status or obligation. And then he was elected President (twice).One of the first things that his successor, JFK, did was to get Congress to reinstate former General of the Army Eisenhower to his status as a five-star officer, and backdate his seniority to cover his period as President. And resume his full pay and allowances for life. The only thing he didn’t do was get him back pay for the period while President (no double dipping so couldn’t do that).Of course, the Nation has had former generals as President before: Washington, Jackson, Grant, perhaps one or two more. But none of them within the last 100 years (other than Eisenhower). And none of them were technically “retired” as we understand the term today, where they still carried lawful authority if recalled to active service. They had each served, and quietly “retired” on to other things, and still carried the honorific title but the issue of civilian control was not a huge thing then.