Formal Objection In Court: Fill & Download for Free

Sure if you count “having no case" as a technicality.This is a frustrating but completely predictable outcome of this whole process. Trump's devotees went into this whole thing with a pre-formed conclusion, even before the election. Trump was very explicit about this: his victory was inevitable, and if he lost, that would prove that there was massive voter fraud. They very literally allowed for no other possibility.A belief like that doesn't usually change when it encounters an opposing reality. When Trump lost, they assumed, based in no other facts, that he's been cheated. Any claims supporting that were embraced without question, and any arguments or evidence to the contrary were either ignored or rationalized.Trump losing in court, not once or twice, but 50 times is a pretty tough pill to swallow for that group. Losing a couple of cases in front of liberal judges could be brushed off as part of the conspiracy. Trump having his claims summarily dismissed by his own appointees required a real feat of mental gymnastics.Here's how that went: Trumpsters were fed a steady and constant diet of claims from OANN and Epoch Times that made it sound like the fraud was so obvious that anyone would have to see it. But when the cases got to court, they were summarily dismissed.For someone living in that bubble, that sounds insane, so they start to look into it, and they realize that the judges weren't hearing the same claims that they've been hearing. Now, I might hear that and wonder why the president's lawyers weren't saying the same things to a judge that they'd been saying in press conferences. We might even suspect that was a sign that the claims they'd been making might not actually have evidence behind them, and so couldn't be presented in court.Not Trump supporters, though. See, they already know that Trump won, evidence be damned. So the fact that Giulani et al weren't even trying to argue fraud before the judges is proof that the courts are somehow part of the conspiracy. After all, if they were reading the same Breitbart articles as me, it would be obvious that the election was stolen.The reason “good evidence of rigging" was never presented in court is because that evidence doesn't exist. And lawyers aren't allowed to make claims that they can't back up with evidence. “I read it on the internet”, and “people are saying" don't cut it in the courtroom.The objective nature of the court system doesn't mesh well with propaganda. And people who get their information from propaganda don't like that.

Yes, the fact the Baathist party admitted it happened and that it did it.General Ali Al-Majid, the Iraqi officer who commanded the attack even confessed to it openly and proudly in court. He admitted to the whole Al-Anfal campaign:In the late 1980s, he was commander of Iraqi forces in northern Iraq. At the end of the Iraq-Iraq war in 1988, he ordered the use of chemical weapons against the Kurdish village of Halabja, killing 5,000 residents.Following a ceasefire with Iran, Saddam sought vengeance for Kurdish collusion with Iranian forces, ordering attacks on Kurdish villages and towns.Thousands of villages declared "prohibited areas" were razed and bombed. Thousands of villagers were deported, many executed. The court heard that 182,000 died in attacks which were overseen by Majid.During the hearings he said he had ordered legitimate security operations against the Kurds."I am the one who gave orders to the army to demolish villages and relocate the villagers," he said at one hearing."The army was responsible to carry out those orders."I am not defending myself. I am not apologising. I did not make a mistake."Iraq's 'Chemical' Ali sentenced to deathThere’s obviously context, Al-Majid was sent with the objective of ending an Iranian Islamist-backed insurrection in the North and came to the conclusion genocide was the answer as the Iranians cannot use Kurds to attack Iraqi forces if Kurds are not present on the border.Thus he wiped out villages and gave the surviving villagers choice options: flee or death.The Baathist party was open about this and it was never a secret, hence why General Al-Majid refuse to apologize in court.A confession should suffice then as proof.

Reproducing an answer I gave to the question What is your most important piece of advice for new Police officers? :Being courteous to the public you serve isn’t the same as being servile. A friendly smile or a sympathetic ear doesn’t cost you anything. It may be the 7000th petty theft report you’ve taken this week, but it’s her very first.Kids love cops. Love ’em back. The kids who’ve got a good memory of a police officer who was kind to them will grow up to be supporters of law enforcement.Learn to write! Know how to turn nouns and adjectives into subjects and objects, verbs and adverbs into predicates. Subjects, predicates, and objects into grammatical, readable sentences. Learn correct spelling. Learn correct grammar. Don’t trust your computer to catch all your mistakes. And keep the pretentious police phraseology to a minimum. Don’t say “this officer” or “reporting officer.” Just say “I,” the way you do when you talk. Just use plain, easy-to-understand declarative sentences. The difference between a good report and a mediocre report can be the difference between a conviction and an acquittal.If you’re married don’t cheat on your spouse. How’s a whole community of perfect strangers supposed to trust you to keep your oath to the public if the person you supposedly love more than anyone else in the world can’t trust you to keep the public promise you made to him or her?You’ll be tempted to lie in court. Don’t! If you get caught, then you face dismissal, disgrace, and probably prison. And for what? Was the guy you lied to convict Al Capone? Jack the Ripper? Pablo Escobar? Or was he some two-bit skel you’ll get the next time? Tell the truth in court. If you don’t know the answer to a question, just say you don’t know. Don’t speculate unless you’re asked to.When you’re off-duty, be off-duty. You spend 40 hours a week (and often much more) with cops. Spend your off-time with family and friends, and remind yourself that there are other people in the world besides cops, criminals, and victims.Develop interests outside of police work. Your church. Your community. Music. Art. Books. Police work is an ego-involving profession, which is to say, it’s what you will draw a good deal of your sense of identity from. Have other things in your life that can expand your horizons.