Projects For Assistance In Transition From Homelessness: Fill & Download for Free

I'm going to guess the same things that are being done for homeless jobless adults without asperger's.Not being insensitive but the type of disability dose not single disabled homeless people out as getting better or worse help. Here's the kicker though. If he can't get the help he needs to get on disability or ssi and housing then YOU may have to put in the footwork for him. As far as the running from the courts, if it's not extraditable he just had to stay away from those counties or states. It's in his favor that he's not housed and has asperger's because that does get him on a list quicker and might get him higher on the housing list. Otherwise there's not much. I'd recommend looking into a program called PATH in whatever area he's in. Projects for Assistance in Transition from Homelessness (PATH). It's for homeless individuals with mental and physical disabilities. It's how God got me off the streets. O and if he's NOT on disability or SSI (supplemental security income) for SOME reason look for an organization called SOAR. They are legal advocates that help homeless people get their ssi/disability.

First, you are not alone! I don’t know you but I care about you and I don’t want you to die! I am providing some information that I hope will help you. Unfortunately, I don’t know what state you are in, however, these sources are national and will be able to provide you with helpful resources in your state. Please contact them. And remember that the world would be a much worse place without you! I want you to be here!SAMHSA Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services AdministrationUS Department of Health and Human ServicesLast Updated: 06/20/2019Find Immediate AssistanceContact PATH providers who offers services for people experiencing or at risk of homelessness and serious mental illness, or use the following helplines, online directories, and support organizations to connect with assistance.State PATH Contacts (SPC) and Provider ContactsProjects for Assistance in Transition from Homelessness (PATH)Program Referrals211Dial 2-1-1 to access a free and confidential referral service. You’ll find programs that can assist with housing, access to health care, food, and other services.Homelessness and Housing AssistanceDepartment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Housing AssistanceIf you are experiencing or at risk of homelessness, use the HUD list of resources and services. You’ll find a directory of shelters, helplines, and information on how to contact housing counselors. Learn how to obtain emergency assistance, food assistance, and other services.HUD State InformationSearch for HUD homelessness resources in your state.Supplemental Security Income/Social Security Disability Insurance (SSI/SSDI) AssistanceSSI/SSDI Outreach, Access, and Recovery (SOAR)The SAMHSA SOAR program provides SSI/SSDI application assistance to people who are experiencing or at risk of homelessness, mental illness, medical impairment, or co-occurring substance use disorder.Suicide PreventionNational Suicide Prevention LifelineIf you or someone you know is suicidal or in emotional distress, call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, 1-800-273-TALK (8255). Trained crisis workers are available to talk 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. They can provide crisis counseling and mental health referrals. Your confidential and toll-free call goes to the nearest crisis center in the lifeline national network.

Many answers have extrapolated what a President Gore would have done if he won the 2000 general election but we need to explore the initial decision of the Bush v Gore case before the Supreme Court. Note: I’m not a lawyer so objective lawyerly corrections are welcome. As opposed to popular rhetoric, SCOTUS ruled in favor of Bush for logical reasons. In short, SCOTUS ruled that Florida was required to use the same accounting method for all counties, as opposed to what some wished (to only recount some counties using varying methodologies), and that doing otherwise would be a violation of the Equal Protection Clause. There was also the issue of whether or not the case required an answer to a political question (something fundamentally political in question and thus not appropriate for the court to make a legal ruling on). If SCOTUS ruled in favor of Gore, it would have set a new legal precedent regarding state-federal interactions and general election law. I can’t speak to how later cases would be affected by a Gore victory (hopefully experts will answer that in this question) but it would signify a change in how SCOTUS conducts business (i.e. the political question issue).Now, onto the details of a Gore Presidency…Candidate Gore’s Platform: As opposed to the lack of details in many political campaigns in the past few years, the Gore-Lieberman campaign offered many proposals. Thankfully http://4presidents.us has the text of the campaign’s platform site pages (this is gold for analytical folks like me). The points listed below are things he would have changed (as opposed to continuing to support). A Gore-Lieberman Administration would:Economy:Award new grants for universal broadband Internet coverage and accessBan soft money in political campaigns and create a fund to publicly fund political campaignsBoost spending for research and developmentBuild on Clinton’s Equal Pay Initiative (training for employers to comply with pay requirements)Encourage independent or assisted living of and employment for disabled individuals through new fundingEnsure that “third generation” wireless spectrum is available to telecommunications companiesExpand eligible businesses under the Family and Medical Leave ActExpand the safety net for farmers with augmented crop supportsGrow the number of housing vouchers and homeownership in urban areasIncentivize more individuals to get off welfare and begin working through grants and tax incentivesIncrease labor union protectionsIncrease the minimum wage by $1 over two yearsProvide funding for mass transit systems (such as light and high-speed rail)Strengthen child support collections and other fatherhood requirementsEducation:Establish universal voluntary preschool and boost Head Start fundingEventually fully fund educations for students with disabilitiesIncrease funding for non-traditional schools (such as charters)Offer grants to educate or reeducate workers and lengthen the period displaced workers receive Trade Adjustment AssistanceProvide funds to repair or rebuild schools, wiring classrooms for Internet accessQuadruple the number of students at 21st Century Leaning Centers and further support other after-school programsRaise teacher payRecruit 100,000 new teachersRequire student testing 3 times between 3rd grade and graduation, rewarding successful districts and turn around failing onesEnergy and Environment:Create a trust fund and tax credits to help consumers buy energy efficient goods and make buildings more efficient and weatherizedEncourage the development of alternative energy sources (such as solar)Establish a cap-and-trade carbon emissions system and incentivize companies to reduce pollution through creditsFund projects to reduce America’s dependence on foreign oilPrevent drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and in sensitive offshore areasRestore the “polluter pays” funding mechanism for Superfund sitesFederal Spending:Create IRA-style savings accounts for retirement, managed by private firms and parallel to current Social Security benefitsEnsure employee pension portability and protections from changes by employersHave every agency functionally online, accepting applications, providing services, etc.Increase Social Security benefits for stay-at-home parents and widows/widowersPay down the national debt (with budget surplus funds)Shore up Social Security (by paying down the national debt with budget surplus funds) and create tax-free savings accountsForeign Policy and Defense:Change how the Pentagon operates for efficiency and cost savingsDevelop a limited national missile defense systemFully fund the military’s TRICARE health care systemRequire labor and environmental standards in international trade agreementsWork to improve health care access, the variety of services, and long-term benefits provided by the Veterans AdministrationHealth Care:Allow 55 to 65 year olds buy Medicare health insuranceCover up to 50% of prescription drug costs for seniors (up to $5,000 annually)Create an initiative to support families with disabled individualsDouble funding to find cures for cancer (spending increases for other diseases, especially HIV/AIDS)Encourage competition in Medicare insurance plansExpand Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) child and family eligibility and the ability to enrollExpand Medicaid coverage for nursing home expensesGive greater negotiating and cost saving authority to traditional Medicare plansMandate full child mental health coverage for private insurers and CHIPPass a Patients’ Bill of Rights (greater negotiation with insurance companies)Reach underserved populations by growing the National Health Service Corps and the Projects for Assistance in Transition from HomelessnessSeparate Medicare payroll taxes from the regular budget with a Medicare “lock box”Streamline and simplify Medicaid and food stamp enrollmentStrengthen community, public, and academic health and mental centersLaw Enforcement and Immigration:Expand the number of drug courts and their authority to order drug tests of offendersHire 50,000 new police officers, 10,000 community prosecutors, 500 ATF agentsImpose new gun regulations (including databases, background checks, and waiting periods)Restore benefits for legal immigrants (such as welfare, Medicaid, and Social Security)Taxes:In general, Gore aimed to expand or introduce new tax credits for working class families, stay-at-home parents, low-income earners, retirees, soon-to-be retirees, environmental causes, and innovative research. It is unclear how exactly the credits would be paid for other than his mention of the budget stimulus. He did not mention in writing raising tax rates.New Credits: a long-term care tax credit, a small business premium health care tax credit, an individual health insurance tax credit, a school modernization bond tax credit, the College Opportunity Tax Credit (college tuition and training), the New Markets Incentive (tax benefits for capital investments in distressed communities), business tax incentives for energy efficiency and environmental improvementExpanded Credits: the Earned Income Tax Credit, increase the Standard Deduction for marriage penalty relief, simplify estate tax exemptions for small businesses and family farms, the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, Brownfields tax incentives (made permanent)Made Refundable Credits: the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit (fully), the After-School Tax Credit (new and fully), the Research and Experimentation Tax Credit (partial) Note: refundable tax credits give money to households and businesses in excess of their tax liability so it is counted as new spending (not decreases in revenue) in the federal budget.The Political Environment: In 2001, a new Congress was sworn in along with the new President. Between the 106th and 107th Congresses, the Republicans maintained their majority of the House, while the Senate went from a 55-45 Republican majority to a 50/50 split. I assume that the new Congress would have this make up because the Bush v Gore case came just after the election, thus not influencing the lower elections.The nation faced some shorter-term issues in those first 6 months. Here they are along with the Bush-Gore differences (if any):Economic Downturn: Where Bush enacted his broad tax cuts, Gore would have pushed for economic stimulus. When Congress would disagree, he would put together a targeted tax package that reflect parts of this campaign platform (larger credits for the eligible, new cuts for small businesses). The plan would generally be supported, especially with budget surplus money burning a hole in the national pocket. Long-term result, Congress would still need to reauthorize these changes, potentially causing debates like that of the 2011 Fiscal Cliff negotiations.Education Reform Package: Though Bush and Gore had some overlap (using testing as a key means to measure student process and to barter with districts), Gore’s proposals were a bit more Obama-ish with the roots of Race to the Top and an ever-shrinking student-to-teacher ratio in classrooms. While there would be no No Child Left Behind as we know it, Gore would spend some of this initial political capital on a similar big move. I see two possibilities: Gore pushes a Democrat version of NCLB that grows teacher ranks and tries to retrain more workers OR he uses that capital on a completely different issue (knowing how Gore is now, I’d vote on a start to a cap-and-trade system, likely state-based, that tries to start to monetize carbon pollution – my money would still be on education reform).China Spy Plane “Crisis”: Remember this one? A U.S. spy plane collided with a Chinese plane, forcing the U.S. plane to land in China. In President Bush world, we all tensely sat as the servicemembers were returned in not so a dissimilar fashion as the recent Iranian naval situation (i.e. “oh God, what are we gonna d—oh, they’re back already?”). I don’t see a different result with Gore as president. He would work the channels to get our boys back but not make any rash statements of going to war or whatnot.Budget Surplus: There would be a battle for the balance of the surplus. Republicans would want to cut taxes or at least give some back to folks whereas Gore (and Bill Clinton) wanted to pay down the debt and shore up Social Security. With tax cuts in a way being neutralized with Gore’s quasi-stimulus package, he would have some leverage to strengthen Social Security (I would say mostly because Republicans could just as easily use it as a campaign bright point as Gore come reelection).Then 9/11…A President Gore would seek a similar path as Bush in at least the first few months after the attacks. He would send whatever the military told him to on a conquest cruise through Afghanistan, he would authorize intelligence and law enforcement agencies to step up terrorist investigations, and he would pledge any and all domestic resources to rebuilding NYC and the pentagon. I also think that the US PATRIOT Act would pass, the anthrax mail attacks would still occur, and the U.S. would yet again be seen as a policeman (but this time a policeman with a cause). What I can’t say is if Gore would have employed torture. He would at least not boast about possibly doing it like Bush did, nor would he classify terrorists as enemy combatants and grant them rights under the Geneva Convention. To top all of this off, he would likely declare a war on terror, through I think it would be a bit keyed back and without the black-or-white declarations of Bush’s address to Congress in 2001.Now for a surprise. I don’t think that a President Gore would have created the Department of Homeland Security. He would have thrown tons of money at the FBI, CIA, NSA, and ATF to better coordinate their efforts but he would have had to play politics, even just after 9/11. Instead of appearing like a big government Democrat, he would hold back on creating drastically more bureaucracy in favor of building up existing agencies. He might have changed this policy after the 9/11 Commission report came out in 2004 or if other terrorist attacks occurred but initially I think he thinks of what resources were available to him for the previous eight years and acts on those capabilities instead of trying to make new ones. To pile on, I also think that he does not federalize airport security screeners, instead imposing a mandate on states to figure it out.In this respect, we’d still have whistleblowers like Edward Snowden because mass data collections would still occur (though I think that Gore would have changed some policies when he himself found out about them – something likely not happening during his administration). However, on the bright side, having no DHS would mean the Federal Emergency Management Agency would have remained independent and wouldn’t have experienced the brain drain it continues to suffer being weighed down by DHS bureaucracy and de-prioritization. This means that relief for Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma, and Gustov would look more like Hurricane Andrew recovery operations. The ripple effects here would be felt by many.Later in his term (I’m assuming he would get reelected after facing a possible Jeb Bush or Newt Gingrich challenge in 2004), Gore would push for and face a few more challenges:Drug Plans: Bush created the Medicare Part D program that helps the elderly get prescription drugs. This was also something Gore spoke about during his campaign so I would expect something similar to today’s Part D to be in a Gore-run world.Africa and AIDS: President Bush increased funding for AIDS relief in Africa more than any previous President. Though Gore called for something similar, I think it was a few steps behind Bush’s actions. Advantage Bush.Alito and Roberts No More: With the retirement of O’Connor and death of Rehnquist, Gore would have nominated left-of-center judges. This would likely have bearing on cases concerning campaign finance, handguns, and an infinite number of cases going forward. The court wouldn’t necessarily be a shoe in for left cases as the court tends to shift voting blocks for each case.China in the WTO: The People’s Republic would still gain access to freer trade with western nations but Gore called for greater consideration for labor and environmental practices in foreign trade negotiations so it’s interesting to see what he would do, especially as China gained membership in late 2001 as the U.S. was recovering from recession.Russo-Georgian War: In the twilight of his presidency, Russia would likely still have invaded parts of Georgia, claiming the tiny nation acted against ethnic Russian people and so on (remind you of Ukraine today?). Gore’s response would likely have been similar to Bush’s. Condemn Russia’s actions, supply humanitarian relief, but don’t offer any military assistance or the chance of U.S. servicemembers getting killed in the area.Great Recession: The last thing in the Gore presidency would have likely been a big economic shock like we what we felt in 2007. It might have been different (Gore wanted more homeownership, which could have worsened things, but he might have had a better federal balance sheet without the invasion of Iraq) but government financial and housing policies would have met with changing economic conditions and market distortions to equal a large amount of job loss and market volatility. Gore would have likely bailed out the large banks for fear of greater damage and he might have accompanied them with a stimulus not unlike President Obama’s, thus doubling down on more market intervention.In summary, I think that a President Gore would have conducted business differently than President Bush but both would marginally match each other’s actions in instances that were going to happen regardless who was in the White House or in control of Congress. Perhaps this is a good sign of how Americans are alike (Democrats, Independents, and Republicans) but times were also very different at the start of the new millennium. The budget stimulus was thought to make things easier for everyone and, like winning the lottery, it might have been better if it never existed, making elected officials fundamentally address challenges without the need to throw too much money at problems.I wholly admit I missed a million things that went on during the Bush years.