Hospital Patient Admission Form Pdf: Fill & Download for Free

In the 70s, eight sane, average, working people sought to gain admission to psychiatric hospitals.They kept their lies to a minimum; they provided their psychiatrists with accurate details about their lives, relationships and jobs (except for those who were psychologists themselves, as they didn’t want differential treatment). Their complaints contained only a single fabrication: The pseudopatients claimed they heard vague voices saying “empty”, “hollow” or “thud”.As auditory hallucinations go, this is a pretty tame one. Aside from the words being eerie as heck, there’s nothing necessarily upsetting or threatening about them. By modern standards, you’d probably be considered at mild end of the psychosis spectrum.Nevertheless, the eight patients were accepted into a total of 12 hospitals, from run-down, underfunded urban facilities to expensive, acclaimed medical centres. Each person was randomly allocated to a hospital, and they were admitted.From here on out, they acted completely normally. Even their reports of auditory hallucinations stopped. The actors stopped being actors and instead went about their healthy, mentally stable business within the ward.This was the whole reason they had entered the hospitals. They were all participants in an experiment designed by David Rosenhan, who wanted to answer one question: can we tell sanity from insanity?According to Rosenhan’s report: no.The seven participants who entered public hospitals were diagnosed with schizophrenia, while the one participant who entered a private hospital was diagnosed with manic-depressive psychosis. None of them were ever identified as impostors by the staff, although they were recognised by 30% of the other patients, who guessed they were researchers or journalists collecting information on the hospital. The participants certainly made no secret of acting like researchers; they openly took notes on the hospital and its patients. Some staff seemed to interpret this as a sign of mental ill-health, with one nurse labelling this “writing behaviour”, and considering it further evidence of the participant’s psychosis.The stay was boring, dehumanising and did little to actually support patients. The participants reported that the staff were generally well-meaning, but often invaded their privacy, watching them while they used the toilet, and objectified them, discussing patients openly as if the patients weren’t even there. Doctors spent minimal time with patients — an average of 6.8 minutes a day — and medicalised the most mundane of behaviours.Some staff members were verbally and physically abusive.The participants asked to be released, telling their psychiatrists that they were fine, and no longer had any symptoms. Most were released after “admitting” they were mentally ill, and agreeing to take antipsychotic medications, which they promptly flushed down the toilets. A lawyer was called for those who were never going to be allowed to leave voluntarily.The length of their stays ranged from 7 to 52 days, which, considering they all entered with identical symptoms, seems like a drastic difference. Upon leaving, the participants were diagnosed with schizophrenia “in remission”, a label that would stay with a real patient forever, and maintain the stigma even after so-called successful treatment.If sanity and insanity exist, how shall we know them?— Rosenhan, 1973, On Being Sane in Insane Places.[1][1][1][1]So, apparently, there’s no way to convince a psychiatric hospital of your sanity. Rosenhan argued that the diagnostic system was so flawed that psychiatrists couldn’t tell the difference between the sane and insane, the healthy and the helpless. We locked people up, took away their liberty, treated them as inhuman, all based on nothing. It was a wake up call for psychology — and it was an embarrassment.But it was also the beginning of an academic dogfight. This study is drowning in controversy, even as it approaches its 50th anniversary. According to some, Rosenhan concealed the accounts of participants who had positive experiences, just to create a juicier narrative. Some question why Rosenhan never published more works on this data — was it because Rosenhan knew it couldn’t stand up to scrutiny? One author claimed that she could only find evidence for two of the participants — one being Rosenhan himself, and one being a positive account — and the others’ records were untraceable.[2][2][2][2]Personally, I think it’s feasible that everything could have gone down exactly as Rosenhan suggested, given the state of mental health care in the 70s; psychology was still young, and no one had anywhere near as much knowledge or sensitivity as we do now.But I do question Rosenhan’s conclusions. The participants told psychiatrists that they were mentally ill and wanted to be admitted to the hospital for treatment, and it’s hardly surprising that the staff took them at their word. Mental health is a largely subjective experience, and it makes sense to rely on people’s subjective reports to diagnose them. As Seymore S. Kety (whoever he is) put it:If I were to drink a quart of blood and, concealing what I had done, come to the emergency room of any hospital vomiting blood, the behavior of the staff would be quite predictable. If they labeled and treated me as having a bleeding peptic ulcer, I doubt that I could argue convincingly that medical science does not know how to diagnose that condition.[3][3][3][3]The terrible conditions and baseless stay times, though… Yeah, that’s pretty bad.But I’d like to think psychiatric hospitals, and psychiatric diagnoses, are a lot better now. A recent study has reported high inter-rater reliability for the diagnosis of psychosis and depression,[4][4][4][4] and 71% of UK mental health hospitals have been rated as good or outstanding[5][5][5][5] . There’s still a long, long way to go in terms of mental health care (this lovely, damning WHO report will give you nightmares) but I’d like to think it’s better than Rosenhan’s day.And I’d like to think, by now, there really is a way to talk yourself out of the psych floor.Footnotes[1] https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2384&context=lawreview[1] https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2384&context=lawreview[1] https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2384&context=lawreview[1] https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2384&context=lawreview[2] Rosenhan experiment - Wikipedia[2] Rosenhan experiment - Wikipedia[2] Rosenhan experiment - Wikipedia[2] Rosenhan experiment - Wikipedia[3] [PDF] On pseudoscience in science, logic in remission, and psychiatric diagnosis: a critique of Rosenhan's "On being sane in insane places". | Semantic Scholar[3] [PDF] On pseudoscience in science, logic in remission, and psychiatric diagnosis: a critique of Rosenhan's "On being sane in insane places". | Semantic Scholar[3] [PDF] On pseudoscience in science, logic in remission, and psychiatric diagnosis: a critique of Rosenhan's "On being sane in insane places". | Semantic Scholar[3] [PDF] On pseudoscience in science, logic in remission, and psychiatric diagnosis: a critique of Rosenhan's "On being sane in insane places". | Semantic Scholar[4] Inter-Rater Reliability of the Diagnoses of Psychosis and Depression in Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities[4] Inter-Rater Reliability of the Diagnoses of Psychosis and Depression in Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities[4] Inter-Rater Reliability of the Diagnoses of Psychosis and Depression in Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities[4] Inter-Rater Reliability of the Diagnoses of Psychosis and Depression in Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities[5] https://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20170720_stateofmh_report.pdf[5] https://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20170720_stateofmh_report.pdf[5] https://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20170720_stateofmh_report.pdf[5] https://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20170720_stateofmh_report.pdf

So here it is.A dialogue which fits to my admiration for this institution -Kehte hain agar kisi cheez ko dil se chaho ... to puri kainaat usse tumse milane ki koshish mein lag jaati hai ,itni shiddat se maine tumhe paane ki koshish ki hai ... ki har zarre ne mujhe tumse milane ki saazish ki haiIt is said that if you really desire something from the heart ... then the whole universe will work towards getting you that, I have wanted you so much, so truly ... that the entire universe has conspired for me to get you.Picture abhi baaki hai mere dost —So here is the college I got through Neet — LADY HARDINGE MEDICAL COLLEGEAs seen in the logo 1916 , this institution has witnessed both the pre and post independent India and surfaced a legacy of more than 100 years, and had produced gems in the field of medicine.Located in the heart of delhi , it imprints as a heart and accepts everyone with open arms and heartly warmth.Coming from a lower middle class background, where generally (not all) parents think why to waste money , resources on a daughter and consider them a liability, I find myself very lucky that I made it.I always remember the day when result of first round was about to come. It was 1–2 pm. I was in the car with my father and brother. We were heading to my father's hometown for some purpose. Me and my brother were refreshing the website again and again and suddenly that link popped up provisional allotment result. My heart beats were sky high ,fingers had turned numb ,an anxiety surfaced my mind. I clicked on the link to download the pdf. I searched my credentials and saw on little right side, a word appeared- lady. I continued reading. Then it came Lady Hardinge Medical College - alloted. My brother was also checking side by side. He said, check again. I also couldn't believe yet. I closed the pdf and opened it again, the result was the same. I can't express my feelings about the inevitable relief I got. My father had no idea. He was just driving. We were on the back seat. I told him in a whispering tone while he was driving that I had been alloted lhmc. He just jumped from his seat… his face turned red. I had never seen him so happy. Suddenly, my brother who was sitting next to me, started crying. It was the first time I felt proud and happy seeing him cry. He had expected a lot from me. He always said, ‘tu kuch accha kregi'. He used to say LHMC is not a cakewalk and today he felt so proud. I called my mother and her happiness was on cloud nine. As we were travelling to home town and we were crossing the holy mother ganga we stopped, bought some prasad and prayed to her. We then continued our journey ahead.Brief history ( source - official website)The Lady Hardinge Medical College for women was founded in 1914 to commemorate the visit of Her Majesty Queen Mary in 1911-12. Lady Hardinge the wife of the then Viceroy was the first to take initiative for starting a medical college for women, as the lack of separate medical college for women made it almost impossible for Indian women to study medicine.The foundation stone of this institution was laid by Lady Hardinge on 17th March, 1914. Unfortunately this great lady died later in the same year and on the suggestion of Queen Mary the college and the hospital was named after Lady Hardinge to perpetuate the memory of its founder.The number of admissions to the first year was increased gradually from 16 per year in 1916 to 60 in 1956. In 1961 the admissions were increased to 100 and were further raised to 130 in 1970. To implement the Central Educational Institution (Reservation In Admission) Act 2006 LHMC increased under graduate admissions to 150 in 2008 and now 240 in 2020 . Starting in 1916 with only 80 beds for the departments of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, LHMC has now bed strength of 877 beds in Smt. S.K. Hospital and 377 beds in Kalawati Saran Children Hospital. A separate outpatient block was started in 1958 to cater to the needs of ever increasing population of Delhi.Kalawati Saran Children Hospital was established on 17th March 1956 as a center of excellence in pediatric care and research. At the outset it had only 50 beds, gradually by 1994 the bed strength was increased to 350 and presently there are 377 beds in KSCH. It has the largest Neonatal wing in Delhi with 84 beds. The opening of Indo-Japan new block has augmented various medical facilities for the patients.After reading the history, you will surely get its importance in the empowerment of women in india in medical fraternity.I felt love for this institution.Brief details-Fees —1325 per annum. (excluding hostel fee and mess fee)Cut off rank acc to 2nd round counselling this year: AIQ- 571 rank.Associated with Kalawati Saran Children Hospital and Sucheta Kriplani hospital (one of the best hospitals of their fields in Asia)I am Fully satisfied with my college.Coming opd block.Campus top viewUnion Health minister visit .

The call usually follows a similar script - a child belonging to a poor family suffering from an ailment needs donation urgently. There is a lot of emotional appeal and extreme urgency. What struck me was the similarity in the phrases they used to appeal for donations.More than 70% of such NGOs are fake and they operate underground from residential areas. When you get a call from them, they also share a patient registration document which makes you think that the case is real.What actually they do is “illegally buy” papers from the hospitals of patients who were operated or deceased and modify them. There are multiple ways to counter check whether the call you got was real fake.Check whether the NGO is registered? NGO Partnership SystemAsked for last 3 years report - fakes will not revert backLook for NGO’s letter head with contact detailsAsking for office phone number - They wont have one.A good board, financial disclosures in the annual report, a fixed address/phone number and an invitation to visit them whenever you like are all indications of a good organisationAsking for patients parents number - Even patient’s parent are not aware of this.If you look at the document scan - Check whether hospital's address and phone numbers are manipulated and altered.PDF do not contain any properties and kept blank.Time difference between : Brief clinical history, Progress Record, Admission Sheet.visit the hospital personally or google Contact number of the hospital, ask them about the patient in Room no (mentioned in the document) and OPD registration number.Asked for TAX Exemption active certificate. Check the validity of the 80G certificate.Bluff - one of my friend wants to become become volunteer of organization.Helping some one is what we want to do but lets not give away our hard earned money to these scumbags.