Form 403 Act: Fill & Download for Free

The parliamentary constituencies are formed in such a way that each constituency caters to roughly equal number of people. Now let me provide these examples to explain you in a better way.Population of India = 130 croreNumber of Lok Sabha constituencies = 543Therefore, on an average, each constituency consists of 24 lakh people.Now,Population of Uttar Pradesh = 20 croreNumber of Lok Sabha constituencies = 80So, on an average, each constituency consists of 25 lakh people.Population of Delhi = 1.8 croreNumber of Lok Sabha constituencies = 7Again, each constituency caters to the need of roughly 25 lakh people.Bihar has a population of 9.9 croreNumber of Lok Sabha constituencies = 40Again, if you do the calculation, you will see that each constituency in Bihar has a population of 25 lakh.Gujarat has a population of 6.5 crore, and has 26 Lok Sabha seats. As expected, this again comes to 25 lakh people per constituency.The same holds true for all the states and UTs. You can check the population of each state and the number of their respective parliamentary constituencies. The average population catered to by each constituency will turn out to be about 24–25 lakh.Summary :The number of constituencies - both parliamentary and assembly - depend on the population of a state, and not area. Since UP has a huge population of 20 crore, it has 80 Lok Sabha constituencies and 403 Vidhan Sabha constituencies. Therefore, Rajasthan despite being the largest state (area-wise) has only 26 parliamentary constituencies - far less than UP (80), Bihar (40), Maharashtra (48) and Tamil Nadu (39).Some facts :The Delimitation Commission of India redraws the boundaries of constituencies(or creates a new constituency) depending on the census. The present delimitation of constituencies has been done under the provisions of Delimitation Act, 2002 on the basis of the census conducted in 2001.The constitution was amended in 2002 which prevents any further delimitation of parliamentary constituencies till the first census after 2026. That is, the earliest possibility of the next delimitation is 2031 (assuming the census is conducted in 2031 and results are declared that year).Hope this answer helps !

Please stop blaming us for stuff that we did not cause.There is an article from The Intercept, a progressive online news outlet,[1] that published an article tying the El Paso shooter to Trump.[2] Its core argument is that the El Paso shooter used the same rhetoric that Trump uses. Therefore, Trump caused it.That is not the case.Donald Trump did not arm this man. Donald Trump did not personally instruct this man to kill these people. Donald Trump did not assist this man in the commission of his crimes. Responsibility for an act only comes into play when you personally helped to make the act happen. Unless and until Trump is found to have done any of what I listed above, we cannot hold him responsible.And can we please stop blaming everyone but the individual for crime, too?We hear so many times that guns are the reason for mass shootings.[3] How can an inanimate object commit a crime?That’s like saying that the bottle of acid is the reason that there are so many acid attacks in the United Kingdom.[4] That’s obviously not the case. The people responsible for chucking the acid at women are responsible for their actions.We hear so many times in academia that crime is caused by poverty.[5] It may be true that poor people are statistically more likely to commit a crime than the rest of the population, but that doesn’t absolve the criminal of responsibility. An article at The Appeal argues that fines and fees make it illegal to be poor.[6] The Georgia man that they point to was not put in jail because he was poor. He was put in jail because he refused to comply with the orders of the court after he stole a can of beer. He could have prevented that by either paying his fines or not stealing the beer. You don’t need to be rich to avoid stealing a can of beer.There is also an article that I found while writing this answer on 538 that claims that toxic masculinity causes rape.[7] It doesn’t. Rapists who think that it is acceptable to commit rape are the people who cause rape. A concept that exists almost entirely in postmodern academic literature cannot cause anything.And while we are on the topic of misplacing blame and responsiblity, can we stop acting like drunkiness is an excuse for some behavior and not others?At my college, we take the use, misuse, and abuse of alcohol very seriously. Whenever a student is found to have committed a violation of the code of conduct while drunk, we use their use of alcohol against them in sanctioning.[8] I support this policy, and I always push my colleagues on the disciplinary review committee to take these types of aggravating factors into account when serious violations occur.We also use strong disciplinary measures against those who commit sexual assault while drunk.[9] This is mostly because rape is an atrocious crime, but partly because alcohol never causes the rape to occur.[10] The rapist is always responsible for their actions, and they should be treated that way.Yet, we say that someone cannot consent to sex when they are drunk.[11] Under our sexual misconduct policy, no student is capable of consenting to sex while they are drunk, but they are capable of committing rape (a crime where the assailant necessarily must consent to having sex with the victim) while being drunk.I agree with all liberals and feminists that want to root out rape on college campuses, but this particular policy takes it too far. If someone says yes to sex, they said yes to sex. We cannot hold men responsible for acting under the understanding that a woman was okay for having sex with them. It is entirely possible that the woman might wake up the next morning and be disgusted by the fact that she had sex with the man. She may think back and realize that she didn’t want it, but we cannot use the fact that she was drunk as a way to undo the fact that she said yes. Doing so would be logically equivalent to saying that a rapist should be unaccountable for their actions because they were drunk and couldn’t consent to having the forceful sex with their victim.And on the topic of gun deaths, can we please stop blowing death from “assault rifles” way out of proportion, please?Rifles were used in 403 killings in all of 2017.[12] That number is most likely higher than the number of deaths caused by “assault rifles” because a rifle is simply defined as a gun with spirals cut into the barrel.[13] That means that a gun that fires one bullet before needing to be reloaded could be called a rifle, meaning that shootings with musket-style weapons could fall under this category.Over 37,000 people died in car wrecks in that same year.[14] That means that you are more likely to die in a car wreck at any point in your commute to work from now until the end of the week than you are to die in a shooting with an “assault rifle” from now until Columbus day of 2020, yet instead of wanting to ban cars, we want to ban “assault rifles.”In fact, about 10,874 fatalities were caused by drunk drivers in 2017.[15] That’s more than the number of murders committed using firearms of any kind, yet we want to ban “assault rifles” instead of cars.[16]Johns Hopkins claims that over 250,000 people die every year from medical errors.[17] That means that you are more than 50% more likely to die from a medical mistake in the next 24 hours than you are to die from a shooter using an “assault rifle” from now until Columbus Day of 2020, yet we treat gun deaths as this massive, earth shattering crisis unparalleled by anything in world history.Ten people die everyday from accidental drownings.[18] We barely see one death a day from shooters armed with “assault rifles,” yet we act like gun deaths are the crisis of our time.And while we are on the topic of blowing things way out of proportion, can we please stop saying that hate speech is violence?It’s not. I wrote about the visceral reaction that I got when I sat at a table on my college campus with a sign that read “Illegal immigration is dangerous for everyone.”[19] It was absolutely insane. I was accused of perpetuating the discrimination of people of color. I was also told that I was committing an act equivalent to beating a person of color for putting on that event.An act of violence causes physical injury. Physical injuries include lacerations, bruises, broken bones, concussions, and ruptured organs. Physical injuries do not include feeling upset because you don’t like what I said to you. While there are things people say when debating that can be very upsetting, they did not injure you.And can you guys also please stop saying we vote against our own best interests?I hear this one a lot from liberals, and it drives me crazy. They say that poor conservatives who vote for people like Trump are voting against their best interests.[20] How do you know that? How do you know what we want? Maybe I believe that it is in my best interest to have the President cut marginal income tax rates. Maybe I believe that it is in my best interests to vote for someone who puts constitutionalist and originalist judges onto the federal bench.Saying that making these decisions using my critical thinking skills to analyze all of the data available is voting against my interests is incredibly elitist. It makes you look like you can’t trust us mere mortals to think for ourselves.And please stop saying that no one needs (insert reviled gun here).[21]You don’t know me. You don’t know where I live. For all you know, I could live in the middle of nowhere, 20 minutes from the closest police station. For all you know, I could be the target of constant threats from vigilante racists who want to kill me because of my skin color. For all you know, the police don’t respond to my neighborhood because it is too dangerous to do so.There are people who live in those situations. They need to protect themselves. If they’ve come to the conclusion that they need an AR-15 or some other “assault rifle,” then that is because they’ve analyzed all of the evidence in light of their current situation. This is another elitist phrase that makes you sound like mere mortals like us can’t be trusted to make our own decisions.And can you please stop acting like there is a distinction between lunatics on our side and lunatics on yours.I acknowledge that people on the far right commit acts of terror. I admit that most of them are morally repugnant people that have despicable views, but so are Antifa.Antifa are not acting in self-defense, as some people on the left claim.[22] They are a group of dangerous, armed revolutionaries who should be feared.[23] They commit acts of terror, too.[24][25] It doesn’t matter that they are fighting against fascists. The moral turpitude of your opponents doesn’t negate the moral turpitude of your actions.Conservatives disavow the far right every chance they get, but liberals defend their crazies, even though they do the exact same stuff.[26]And while we are on the topic of false equivalencies and distinctions, can you please stop drawing a false equivalency between biologically determined features and freely chosen actions.A wrestling ref in New Jersey was accused of racism and eventually suspended for forcing an athlete to cut his dreadlocks per the rules of wrestling (it is illegal to have long hair as a wrestler).[27][28]A restaurant in Baltimore was accused of racism because its dress code banned baggy clothes among other things that accusers claimed were part of black culture.[29]That is not racist. Racism is discriminating against people because of their skin color, which is biologically determined. Black people aren’t biologically hardwired to have dreadlocks. Black people aren’t biologically hardwired to wearing flat-brimmed baseball caps. Engaging in those actions are done freely. A black person is perfectly capable of not wearing a flat-brimmed baseball cap or dreadlocks. Criticizing someone for doing so is not racist.I know this is a lot to ask, but maybe this is a good way to begin to heal our wounds that so many on the left have caused.Footnotes[1] The Intercept - Media Bias/Fact Check[2] After El Paso, We Can No Longer Ignore Trump’s Role in Inspiring Mass Shootings[3] https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/no-mr-trump-guns-are-the-reason-for-mass-shootings/2019/08/05/97e58686-b7a0-11e9-b3b4-2bb69e8c4e39_story.html[4] Acid attacks in the UK – where have they been carried out and is London the worst affected?[5] Crime Causes Poverty[6] How Fines and Fees Criminalize Poverty: Explained[7] Science Says Toxic Masculinity — More Than Alcohol — Leads To Sexual Assault[8] https://www.ramapo.edu/student-affairs/files/2019/09/CODE-OF-CONDUCT-2019-2020.pdf[9] https://www.ramapo.edu/titleix/files/2019/09/FY20-Sexual-Misconduct-Policy-Governing-Students-9.1.19.pdf[10] Science Says Toxic Masculinity — More Than Alcohol — Leads To Sexual Assault[11] https://www.ramapo.edu/titleix/files/2019/09/FY20-Sexual-Misconduct-Policy-Governing-Students-9.1.19.pdf[12] Expanded Homicide Data Table 11[13] Definition of rifle | Dictionary.com[14] Drunk Driving Fatalities[15] Drunk Driving Fatalities[16] Expanded Homicide Data Table 11[17] The third-leading cause of death in US most doctors don't want you to know about[18] Unintentional Drowning: Get the Facts[19] Philip Pillari's answer to What forms of harassment have you received because of your political affiliation?[20] Why Americans Vote ‘Against Their Interest’: Partisanship[21] No one needs an AR-15[22] Antifa in America: Militant anti-fascism isn't terrorism, it's self-defense | Opinion[23] Philip Pillari's answer to Why are people who say they are not fascists bothered by anti-fascists?[24] https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/07/19/ice-detention-center-attacker-killed-by-police-was-an-avowed-anarchist-authorities-say/[25] Congressman Steve Scalise Gravely Wounded in Alexandria Baseball Field Ambush[26] Antifa in America: Militant anti-fascism isn't terrorism, it's self-defense | Opinion[27] Civil Rights Investigation Opened After Black Wrestler Had to Cut His Dreadlocks [28] Wrestling Ref Gets 2-Year Suspension for Forcing Black Student to Cut ‘Unnatural’ Dreadlocks[29] Baltimore Crab Restaurant Changes Dress Code After Being Accused of Blatant Discrimination

Breach of contract and breach of trust belongs to two different areas of law. Breach of trust forms the part of Criminal Law ,while Breach of contract is a part of Contract Law.Breach of trust is a crime punishable by law, while in case of breach of contract, it is not publishable but as such is compensatory in nature.Criminal breach of trust is defined in Indian Penal Code, 1860. Whereas breach of contract is defined in Indian Contract Act, 1872.Criminal Breach of Trust -The offense of criminal breach of trust, as defined under section 405 of IPC, is similar to the offense of ‘embezzlement’ under the English law.A reading of the section suggests that the gist of the offense of criminal breach of trust is ‘dishonest misappropriation’ or ‘conversion to own use’ another’s property, which is nothing but the offense of criminal misappropriation defined u/s 403.Essentials for Criminal Breach of TrustThe essential ingredients of Criminal breach of trust are:The accused must be entrusted with property or dominion over it.He must have dishonestly misappropriated the property or converted it to his own use or disposed of it in violation of such trust.The principal ingredients of Criminal Breach of Trust are thus ‘entrustment’ and ‘dishonest misappropriation’.Breach of Contract-Contract is made between the parties who are intended to bind together in a legal obligation i.e to serve the interest of both the parties.Though many a times, the contracting parties work according to the terms and conditions of the other party, there are instances when one party back steps, thus leading to the loss to other party.Thus when a party having a duty to perform a contract fails to do that, or does an act whereby the performance of the contract by him becomes impossible, or he refuses to perform the contract, there is said to be a breach of contract on his part.These were the basic differences between Criminal Breach of Trust and Breach of Contract.Sources-Criminal Breach Of Trust - AcademikeFundamental Breach of Contract