Pdf Order Form - State Of Indiana: Fill & Download for Free

1st: Google your question, then view the result.2nd: Look up the following;How to run for office in Indiana - BallotpediaHow to run for office in Indiana - BallotpediaNote: This article is not intended to serve as an exhaustive guide to running for public office. ... This article outlines the steps that prospective candidates for state-level and congressional office must take in order to run for office in Indiana. .... A candidate seeking office in the Indiana State Legislature must do the following:.‎Year-specific dates · ‎Election-related agencies · ‎Term limits · ‎State legislative ...PDF]2018 Indiana Candidate Guide - IN.govIhttps://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwih4sqUl6PYAhVKYt8KHXXHBXcQFggpMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.in.gov%2Fsos%2Felections%2Ffiles%2F2018%2520Candidate%2520Guide.Final.pdf&usg=AOvVaw18Icn_WbP252UNRXDDenmgFinally, I would think that anyone who is ‘Wanting’ to run for Office in the State of Indiana would not be asking the question on Quora.Thus my answer is for the layperson who wanted to know but did not know where to start.

Disclaimer: This is what I had been taught through education in my country and my own research it certainly does not represent my full perspective nor is it a representation of what other people from my country might think. Rather think of this as a potential perspective of what someone who has went to school and learned about these there before anywhere else might have to sayI guess no one’s done this yet…TurkeyTurkey is perhaps the country where WWI is taught the most vigorously. The reasoning is that Turkey owes it’s very existence to it. The reason we are no longer the Ottomans™ but rather the Republic of Turkey™ is quite simply because of it. You might be wondering why Germany, Austria, the Balkan countries etc. which emerged as separate countries after the war haven’t handled the education of the first world war as such. My explanation may not be correct but here’s the thing: For many countries the war whether you won it or lost it was terrible, for the Ottomans it was devastatingly terrible.Before I begin I’d like to mention something pretty important: The Ottomans fought on the Central Powers side and furthermore in a geography I am certain that very few of you are familiar with. We only know of Somme and Verdun from movies, books or games. We have our own stories to tell and today I think it’s about time I shared some of them with you…(pictured: swords indicate a major land battle and ships indicate naval struggles)World War I is taught three times during our 12 year curriculum. It is briefly touched on during the 4th grade. It begins as the 7th grade ends and continues through 8th grade. And finally the same thing applies for the 10th and 11th grade… I should probably mention during the 8th and 11th grades we don’t call our lesson “History” it is instead called “İnkılâp Tarihi ve Atatürkçülük” (History of the reforms and Ataturkism), the first half deals with the world war and the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire among other things and the 2nd semester deals with the actual reform history we speak of. Both parts feature Atatürk, go figure. Oh and it’s mandatory for everyone. You’ll have to answer questions on this during your high school entry and your college entry exams…So let us finally begin…The state of the Ottoman Empire before the warThis section deals with a bunch of events before the war began: the Balkan wars, the Austrian annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovina, the Italo-Ottoman war; conflict of interests in parliament, civil unrest all throughout the country, resurgence in nationalism etc. etc. tl;dr: “signs that you probably should not get into any more wars until things calm down.” But alas a thing or two made the Ottomans board a one-way train to oblivion. Owing to the so called “Revolution of 1908” a party known as the “İttihad ve Terakki Cemiyeti” (The League of Unity and Progress) managed to seize power. And this new party was willing to seek war as a solution to overcome the Empire’s shortcomings and what’s more to achieve things the empire had never achieved…(Pictured: Enver Paşa; Paşa pronounced as Pa-sha is not a surname it’s a title which is used for commanders and high-ranking officials. )This man here is heralded by some as a hero and by others as a villain. Though for the Western audience he sure seems to be more of a villain. To quote Indiana Neidell from the Great War: “[…] it’s not going to get any better and I’m going to end this episode with one more statistic: thanks in large part to Enver Paşa, during the first world war, one quarter of the entire population of Turkey would die.[1][1][1][1]”This man would be the minister of war of the late Ottoman Empire. Just take note of this character as he’ll come up a couple of times. Along the way…The War BeginsI think somehow we handle this better than a lot of other countries as honestly we could have had we wished remained neutral through the whole thing, except for one minor detail. We clearly establish the resurgence in Imperialism, the rivalry between the Germans and Anglo-French, the resurgence in nationalism, the Alliances, how Italy will flip sides, thought not how Romania who would flip sides, secret treaties etc.(Pictured: Gavrilo Princip)That minor detail is this fellow who shot Franz Ferdinand. I’ve heard people call him a Serbian nationalist and a Bosnian nationalist, but in Turkey you’ll probably never hear any history teacher call him Bosnian. Is it historical sentiment? I don’t know for sure. But I’m just pointing it out as it seems like an interesting detail. So we also touch on the infamous Ultimatum Serbia would receive after this, but that’s about it.We barely go into any detail regarding the western front. We continue off from the Ottoman Empire’s entry into the war.The Ottoman Empire’s Bizarre EntryNow despite a century having passed I am astonished how the opposing sides have taught their children contradictory stories.From my memory on Wikipedia, remember guys it’s still blocked here, I recall reading something about how the Ottoman Empire had refused offers from Britain and France and had decided to secretly conspire with the Germans because they’d made better offers. (Source please, because I can’t find it anymore…)Yet what we are taught is as follows, to quote from a pdf of the 2014 edition of the schoolbook[2][2][2][2]: “ When the World War I began, the Ottoman State* had declared its neutrality. Yet the Ottoman State which had lost large swaths of land in the Tripolis and Balkan Wars, was continuing its military and political efforts to reclaim what she had lost. The Ottoman State which sought a place for itself among the European blocs wished to side with the Allies. However since the Allies intended to split up the lands of the Ottoman State between themselves they refused this offer.” (First few sentences of page 22)*(In Turkish Osmanlı Devleti the Ottoman State, is used more often rather than Osmanlı İmparatorluğu the Ottoman Empire which is a more recent coinage)(Because… Empire)But whatever the case the Ottomans decided to side with the Central Powers instead.Now another thing is the actual entry into the war… Which I assure you is far more controversial. What happened was, seemingly the Ottomans abruptly attacked Russian ports. Now among foreign sources I’ve seen one of three stories:The ships had an all German crew but they were disguised as Ottomans.The ships were under Ottoman control but the admiral aboard one of them was a German.The attack was orchestrated by Germans however it was the Ottoman government which demanded they do it.So again I’ll quote from our schoolbook:“Two German ships fleeing the British navy, the SMS Goeben and the SMS Breslau sought refuge from the Ottoman State. The Ottoman State, anounced that she had purchased the ships from Germany. Goeben was renamed Yavuz, Breslau was renamed Midilli. These ships sailed into the Black Sea and bombarded the Russian ports of Sevastopol and Odessa. Due to this event the Ottoman State had joined the war on the side of the Central Powers. With the advent of the Ottoman State new theaters were established and the war was spread over a larger area. ” (This on the same page 22, the second paragraph)”The delivery is as vague as possible. It just claims that we had ourselves baited into the war. Saved the Germans, let them use a false flag, let them carry out an attack… I mean we can tell from the earlier narrative on the İttihad ve Terakki that this was allowed because of their interests, yet the book refuses to openly say “Blame İttihad ve Terakki, they did it!” As I mentioned previously Enver Paşa and the rest of his crew are hailed by some as heroes and by some others as villains. So the way I see it, this unclarity exists to blur the line of morality even more so.(Pictured: T̶h̶e̶ ̶S̶M̶S̶ ̶B̶r̶e̶s̶l̶a̶u̶ Midilli raiding Novorossiysk)We’re at War! (again)Now remember that battle map from above? I’d like to use the schoolbook’s version, but copyright has held me back. The war is split into seven fronts, with some omitted most notably the region wherein we fought the Persian campaign. It is touched on so briefly that you can’t even tell if there was fighting there or not from the book.This part may have a single page or two but you’ll probably spend an entire week discussing the conflicts with your history teacher unless you’re in a hurry.Please note: I’m trying to give these in chronological order, you aren’t normally expected to learn the ordering in school:The Caucasian FrontFighting here began with several attacks by the Russians in the early november of 1914. However they wouldn't remain the attacker for long… You see the İttihad ve Terakki had some very radical ideals… But in particular they wanted to accomplish what Prussia had through the Franco-Prussian war: To unify the Turkic* people and replace the Ottoman Empire with a huge Turkish nation state.*In English Turkic is generally used to refer to all Turks and Turkish to refer to the Turks of Turkey and well the Ottomans for that matter.(Pictured: modern day reimagining of the so called Turan)The educated elite who’d been inspired by how Prussia and Italy had unified wanted to unify the the Turkic people who were spread over a very wide land. Unfortunately there was an eencey weencey problem which would make uniting all these guys really challenging: Russia.The Ottomans were pretty much the only independent Turkic country remaining. Most of these people and lands were a part of the Russian Empire. So the İttihad ve Terakki’s Insane Plan went something like this:Breech through the [Caucasian] Front and keep digging deeper into Russian soil.Rally the Turkic people under Russian control for this cause, and in this way the excessive manpower and resources being used could be constantly reinforced.Hope that, this’ll turn into a massive chain reaction where all of the Turkic peoples under Russia’s control revolt against her and form a massive coalition.Defeat Russia with said coalition and win the world war!After the war ends declare the new Greater Turkey™ (I honestly don’t know if it’d still be called the Ottoman Empire or if they’d adopt a new name).What could possibly go wrong?(Those letters at the bottom read: This is the Sarıkamış Solidarity Group’s archive)You know how Russia has a reputation of not losing? And how most famous wars involve some fellow beginning the offensive in summer and retreating in winter. Enver Paşa, the madman who would assume direct command decided to attack in icy winter. The Russians were pre-occupied with the conflicts in Europe so it was deemed to be a very appropriate time to attack. Yet again the plan was to overwhelm the Russians. So around 100,000 men were deployed in the battle of Sarıkamış. Losing this front was not an option. It was now or never.Turns out it was never… The amount of attrition suffered here was truly phenomenal. Deserters, people freezing to death, disease and a couple of skirmishes with the Russians later it was reduced to less than 20,000, of which quite a few were taken prisoner. The Russians themselves also suffered terribly from the attrition in the form of frostbite.You’ll hear conspiracy theorists say things like, “The German’s feared such rigorous ideals and did a thing or two to sabotage success.” I don’t know for certain how true that is but I’ll just leave you with that.Alas hope of winning such large goals was lost. Later into the war with the Russians weakened by the Bolshevik Revolution a couple of cities such as Kars, Batum and Ardahan which had been captured by the Russians several years ago were taken back and the front was extended all the way until Bakü. The front closed after the Russian withdrawal from the war rendering any further progress impossible.Oh by the way Atatürk who the lesson is named after eventually would be sent here and he’d be in charge of recapturing the cities of Muş and Bitlis.(Pictured: The 60,000 or so poor martyrs who fell victim to ice and snow are still commemorated today. This is a ceremonial walk through the snow of Sarıkamış. It was attended by 25,000 or so people.)The Iraqi FrontBritain in an effort to protect it’s colonies and protectorates along the Persian Gulf and to support the Russian forces fighting along the Caucasus from the south decided to take control of Iraq. After some territorial gains the Ottomans managed to hold them off, until the later years of the war.(Pictured: Victory after the siege of Kut Al Amara, supposedly the first ever siege against an aerial supported town):The British maintained control of Baghdad and Kirkuk throughout the war and towards the end of it they began receiving much better support. So they advanced and advanced and advanced. So much so in fact that they managed to advance into a city (Mosul) even after an armistice was signed and keep it. So yes, very much a splendiferous victory for the British.Raid on the Suez Canal!The Ottomans and Germans tried to cut off Britain from its colonies. The best way do to accomplish this was to attack one of man’s greatest architectural accomplishments: The Suez Canal.We don’t touch on this much, the Ottomans attacked, held some territory for a few days, and ultimately were unsuccessful. The British were nevertheless infuriated and would take several precautions to prevent such an attack from ever occurring again…The Çanakkale (Gallipoli) FrontThe British made a plan to end the Ottoman’s participation by simply charging through the Gallipoli Peninsula into the capital. And from there they’d try to get the Ottomans to surrender while achieving a safe entry into the Black Sea where they’d be able to safely assist the Russians.This friends, was where several legends were born. An entire answer can be specifically dedicated to Gallipoli but I’ll try to keep it short.Tons of people from all across the British Empire: The Raj, Australia, New Zeland, Ireland, Newfoundlanders etc. and the French Empire were all deployed here. Two of the navies of the most powerful countries on the planet vs. the laughing stock of the world…And yet through sheer will and faith the Ottomans somehow managed to resist long enough for the invaders to retreat.So how about I tell you one of such legends:(Pictured: Seyit Onbaşı, Corporal Seyit)Legend has it that the crane of one of the large cannons was broken. So this man here proceeded to carry a 276kg giant piece of ammunition and load it in himself. (this picture was taken after war as a reenactment if I’m not mistaken) It gets better when you find out that was the last shell nearby and that the shot taken from that cannon one shot a British ship called the Ocean.This is where the star of this lesson Mustafa Kemal Atatürk shone for the first time. As he would win many victories in the ensuing skirmishes.The victory of Gallipoli is celebrated every year on the 18th of March. It’s not a holiday or anything but we do still attend ceremonies at school. A fun bit of trivia: the 18th of March does not mark the end of conflict on the contrary it marks the day we actually consider to be the begining of major conflict on the frontier.(Stop traveller! This soil which you have unknowingly trenched upon is the ground where an entire era has sunk.)The Arab Revolt and the Syria-Palestine frontWe really avoid talking about these two as much as possible. The Arab Revolt encompasses a bunch of conflicts starting from Yemen all the way up into Hejaz. And the Syria-Palestine front emerged after the British’s success in repelling the raid on the Suez. In the case of the Arab Revolt all that is said is that we lost to ambush and betrayal and regarding the Syria-Palestine front that Atatürk also fought here and that’s about it.(Pictured: depiction of the Arab revolt)The Galician-Romanian-Macedonian FrontsThe Ottomans reinforced the Bulgarian and Austrian armies who fought here, that’s about it. The fighting here ceased after Russia’s withdrawal from the war.(Pictured: Russian Soldiers on the outskirts of Ternopil, this front truly was fought between different countries, we only joined the fight here to honor our alliances, even so about 90,000 or more troops were deployed here.)The Ending of the WarAmerica joins, the 14 points are made, war comes to a close etc.(Fun fact we never count the 14 points, ergo no one knows of the 12th one.)If I go on any further this answer will be too long for anyone to bother reading so I’ll just give you a quick rundown. The Ottomans who had lost on most of the fronts and were on the losing side as a whole, stopped fighting with the Armistice of Mudros and officialy made peace with the Treaty of Sèvres. Both which contained ridiculous demands and loopholes the Allies used to fight multiple satellite wars in a set of conflicts which would come to be known as “The Turkish War of Independence”. The resistance would be lead by this famous Atatürk who we keep on mentioning. But that is a story for another time. The rest of the first semester deals entirely with that.(The treaty of Sèvres was signed in a porcelain manufactury. As if to mock the Ottomans on how frail they were and desperate to accept the ridiculuous terms proposed.)The InterwarAfter the bloody independence war all sorts of things happened. These encompass the 2nd semester. We get to see the declaration of the republic, the establishment of industry etc. fun stuff (for the most part)Turkey before the 2nd World War tried her darnedest to revoke problematic things from the earlier treaties.Such as reasserting Turkish control over the Straits which were still occupied by an Allied commission.World War 2: The SequelThe new republic or Turkey did not want to join this war for various reasons. That being said: Ahmet Akkoç (白羊 阿赫麦德)'s answer to Was Turkey ever threatened with invasion in WW2?Anyway Turkey avoided the war even if very strict rules were enforced on the public so as to be ready for anything.We talk about the Axis and the Allies though that’s not something very likely to come up on your exam. What is important though is that Turkey joins on the Allies side at the very end so as to be accepted into the United Nations with ease.And that’s about it. The End.Footnotes[1] The Ottoman Disaster - The Battle of Sarikamish I THE GREAT WAR Week 23[1] The Ottoman Disaster - The Battle of Sarikamish I THE GREAT WAR Week 23[1] The Ottoman Disaster - The Battle of Sarikamish I THE GREAT WAR Week 23[1] The Ottoman Disaster - The Battle of Sarikamish I THE GREAT WAR Week 23[2] http://img.eba.gov.tr/339/649/9ce/872/de5/c54/8c0/ba4/8a6/2d3/a52/207/cf0/1a8/074/3396499ce872de5c548c0ba48a62d3a52207cf01a8074.pdf[2] http://img.eba.gov.tr/339/649/9ce/872/de5/c54/8c0/ba4/8a6/2d3/a52/207/cf0/1a8/074/3396499ce872de5c548c0ba48a62d3a52207cf01a8074.pdf[2] http://img.eba.gov.tr/339/649/9ce/872/de5/c54/8c0/ba4/8a6/2d3/a52/207/cf0/1a8/074/3396499ce872de5c548c0ba48a62d3a52207cf01a8074.pdf[2] http://img.eba.gov.tr/339/649/9ce/872/de5/c54/8c0/ba4/8a6/2d3/a52/207/cf0/1a8/074/3396499ce872de5c548c0ba48a62d3a52207cf01a8074.pdf

Two instances of the history of the world being affected by successful attempts to mislead the enemy in American history occur to me. I am willing to bet that no one else mentions them, so:George Rogers Clark was the commander of American revolutionary troops, if we can call them troops – perhaps irregulars or militia would be a better term. He led a small group of such men to remove British influence in the Northwest. The British were there in small numbers in several forts which they in turn had taken over from the French after the Seven Years War, better known as the French and Indian War in US history. Although their numbers were small, the British were a menace because they armed and encouraged Indian tribes to attack American frontier settlements to the east – Virginia, for example.So, Clark and only 175 men walked from Virginia to what is present-day Indiana and Illinois, taking three or four forts, convincing several Indian tribes to no longer fight with the British and bringing the news to the main European presence in the region – French trappers and traders – that France had joined the US against the British. (The Northwest was formerly a part of New France.)And now to the subterfuge: Clark, in capturing one fort, had his few men march across a clearing near the fort and then run around in the woods back to the starting point to march past again. The British commander was convinced that he faced a thousand men. He had far fewer so he surrendered the fort without a shot being fired. When he was apprised of the deception he expressed his dissatisfaction with the unfairness of it all. History does not record whether Clark lost any sleep due to this opinion.Securing the Northwest frontier was important to the ultimate success of the Revolution. The importance of the area was underlined by the War of 1812 (part of the Napoleonic conflicts.) The War of 1812 was fought in part because the British did not abide by the terms of the treaty ending the Revolution and continued a presence in the Northwest, aiding the Indians in their opposition to westward American expansion. In fact, some historians consider the War of 1812 to be the second American revolution vis-a-vis the British. (We are discussing history here and will leave aside questions of right and wrong regarding expansion, expulsion, even genocide regarding the native populations of the Americas when encountering Europeans.)A second example, and a personal one at that: I met my wife's grandfather only once. He was bed-ridden at the time and passed away while my wife and I were overseas. During that meeting, he told me that in the First World War his Ohio unit had been assigned to Italy where their chief contribution to the war effort was to march around the countryside all day, passing through the same areas several times – but each time wearing different parts of their uniform.I researched this a bit years later, because it sounded interesting and because no one else in his family seemed to know much about it.Here an excerpt fromFull text of "In Italy with the 332nd Infantry"The work of the day consisted of long, vigorous hikes withfull mobile equipment worn. To add to the work, the weather was rainy and cold. It was at this time that the changing of clothes was adopted in order to create a false impression as to the number of Americans in Italy. Upon going out in the morning, overcoats and helmets were worn and upon returning in the afternoon by a different route, the overcoats and helmets were out of sight and raincoats and caps were worn. The next day, perhaps, the change would be to leather jerkins. The object was attained, for later, the Austrian prisoners re- ported that they had been under the impression that there wereseveral divisions of Americans in Italy.”Here's another quote, this time from"Viva l’America!": The 332d Infantry on the Italian Front - The Campaign for the National Museum of the United States Army'Within the first week, the men of the 332nd undertook a series of long marches in which no one was excused from participation. Each morning, the companies of the regiment separated, each pursuing a different course along the roads. Marches were made “in double file, not in squad formation, so that when the march began, the interval lengthening between men, each company appeared larger than it really was.” The companies maneuvered their way along the highways each day, all marching in different directions. A daily change in headgear was also ordered; one day overseas caps were worn, the next day campaign hats, while the third day saw every man wearing his steel helmet. Moreover, the men were ordered to change their dress from day to day; jerkins were worn one day, overcoats the next, raincoats the following day. All of this was done in sight of Austrian observers in attempt to convince the Austrians that large numbers of American troops were arriving to take their places along the Piave. One thing that the marches did achieve was to increase the American soldiers’ hostility towards their Austrian foes. Several Americans were overheard vowing how they would treat the enemy “for causing this hell.””I read elsewhere that an Austrian General stated that they estimated the Americans to be 300,000 in number. Their actual number was far, far smaller. In a last-minute decision, the unit had been sent to Italy – after arriving in France – to not only deceive the Austrians but to bolster the morale of the Italians. The previous period had proven disastrous to the Italians militarily and there was fear they would withdraw from the war. That would obviously free up Austrian troops.If someone wishes to read a thorough and well-written account of what the unit did, I recommend reading the pdf referenced above. It is not full of daring-do. In fact, the unit for a long time primarily was involved in ceremonial activities, in addition to marching around. President Wilson, Samuel Gompers and many Italian officials visited them or observed them parade past. Some made it to Rome and everywhere they went, they were feted.In fairness, they trained hard and thoroughly and it looks like they would have made a good account of themselves had they needed to.Eventually they did become involved in one of the last battles of the war – they actually wanted to be involved, as do men who have not known battle, I suppose. In fact, before one action, the Austrians that they faced across a little river proposed that they not attack one another since the word had gone out that an armistice would be taking effect the next day. That actually sounded good to many of the enlisted men – they had had the opportunity to fire their weapons and maneuver about, and that, I suppose, was good enough for many - but certain officers did not want to go back home with no real fighting to their name. So the attack was made, was successful and one young man got killed.After the Armistice and while the Treaty of Versailles was being hammered out, the unit was sent to sort of referee what was going on up and down the coast of what became Yugoslavia, getting as far as Montenegro. (Maybe the first peace-keeping type mission of the US Army?) You can read about what went on in the referenced pdf as well as other sources, but a quick overview is that Italy was promised significant territories for finally entering the war on the side of the Entente powers. After the Armistice, Italy quickly sent troops into the areas promised it. Various patriotic Slavic groups were not in the mood to acquiesce, so in the hopes of preventing bloodshed, the Americans were interposed for a bit. Eventually, the Italians were not given these territories (with the exception of Trieste) through the Treaty of Versailles which left them dissatisfied which led to Mussolini - which is another story. The Japanese felt similarly cheated by Versailles – which is another story. The Germans really did not like Versailles – yet another story, but one which saw my wife's father part of the Big Red One, participating in WWII from North Africa through Sicily, the seventh wave on D-Day on bloody Omaha beach, and on to Czechoslovakia.Anyway, back to my wife's grandfather. My theory is that he did not talk about his experience much (my wife's father had not been told of the marching- around bit, which upset him) because he was a junior officer attached to the staff of a unit that did not suffer much beyond some bed-bugs, being taken advantage by some local merchants, marching a lot in the cold and rain, and getting insufficient or unpalatable food now and then.As a staff officer he would not even have suffered much of any of that. So, I surmise, when he returned to the States, he chose not to talk about this very much. It did not compare, heroics-wise, to the mud and blood of the Western Front. Here is a hint from the above-mentioned pdf. It was written by Battalion Sergeant Major Lettau and we can see that he is a bit defensive and had clearly heard that his unit was considered a propaganda unit that had not done much real fighting:“It may be interesting to know what a day meant to this so-called ** Propaganda Regiment.'' The following is a copy of a Drill Schedule in operation at this time:”