Consortium Agreement Form - Pace University: Fill & Download for Free

GET FORM

Download the form

How to Edit Your Consortium Agreement Form - Pace University Online In the Best Way

Follow these steps to get your Consortium Agreement Form - Pace University edited with efficiency and effectiveness:

  • Hit the Get Form button on this page.
  • You will go to our PDF editor.
  • Make some changes to your document, like highlighting, blackout, and other tools in the top toolbar.
  • Hit the Download button and download your all-set document into you local computer.
Get Form

Download the form

We Are Proud of Letting You Edit Consortium Agreement Form - Pace University With the Best Experience

Take a Look At Our Best PDF Editor for Consortium Agreement Form - Pace University

Get Form

Download the form

How to Edit Your Consortium Agreement Form - Pace University Online

If you need to sign a document, you may need to add text, attach the date, and do other editing. CocoDoc makes it very easy to edit your form with the handy design. Let's see how to finish your work quickly.

  • Hit the Get Form button on this page.
  • You will go to our online PDF editor page.
  • When the editor appears, click the tool icon in the top toolbar to edit your form, like highlighting and erasing.
  • To add date, click the Date icon, hold and drag the generated date to the target place.
  • Change the default date by changing the default to another date in the box.
  • Click OK to save your edits and click the Download button when you finish editing.

How to Edit Text for Your Consortium Agreement Form - Pace University with Adobe DC on Windows

Adobe DC on Windows is a useful tool to edit your file on a PC. This is especially useful when you finish the job about file edit without using a browser. So, let'get started.

  • Click the Adobe DC app on Windows.
  • Find and click the Edit PDF tool.
  • Click the Select a File button and select a file from you computer.
  • Click a text box to adjust the text font, size, and other formats.
  • Select File > Save or File > Save As to confirm the edit to your Consortium Agreement Form - Pace University.

How to Edit Your Consortium Agreement Form - Pace University With Adobe Dc on Mac

  • Select a file on you computer and Open it with the Adobe DC for Mac.
  • Navigate to and click Edit PDF from the right position.
  • Edit your form as needed by selecting the tool from the top toolbar.
  • Click the Fill & Sign tool and select the Sign icon in the top toolbar to customize your signature in different ways.
  • Select File > Save to save the changed file.

How to Edit your Consortium Agreement Form - Pace University from G Suite with CocoDoc

Like using G Suite for your work to complete a form? You can make changes to you form in Google Drive with CocoDoc, so you can fill out your PDF without worrying about the increased workload.

  • Go to Google Workspace Marketplace, search and install CocoDoc for Google Drive add-on.
  • Go to the Drive, find and right click the form and select Open With.
  • Select the CocoDoc PDF option, and allow your Google account to integrate into CocoDoc in the popup windows.
  • Choose the PDF Editor option to open the CocoDoc PDF editor.
  • Click the tool in the top toolbar to edit your Consortium Agreement Form - Pace University on the needed position, like signing and adding text.
  • Click the Download button to save your form.

PDF Editor FAQ

In what ways have Israel and China become partners, and what are the greatest challenges for the Israel-China relationship?

As the Rand report says, Israel and China have a long history including trade. For the US, Israel provides the only alliance we have in the Middle East. Iraq has proven to be a mirage with its current government not always on America’s side. For Israel, the US alliance is proving fleeting with its abandonment of Syria to Russia. If you look at history, China’s connection with Jews and Israel date back to ancient times and trade, also to the persecution of Jews in the world and a refuge in China during those periods.“Jews and Judaism in China are predominantly composed of Sephardi Jews and their descendants. Other Jewish ethnic divisions are also represented, including Ashkenazi Jews, Mizrahi Jews and a number of converts.The Jewish Chinese community manifests a wide range of Jewish cultural traditions, and it also encompasses the full spectrum of Jewish religious observance. Though a small minority, Chinese Jews have had an open presence in the country since the arrival of the first Jewish immigrants during the 8th century CE. Relatively isolated communities of Jews developed through the Tang and Song Dynasties (7th to 13th centuries CE) all the way through the Qing Dynasty (19th century), most notably the Kaifeng Jews (the term "Chinese Jews" is often used in a restricted sense in order to refer to these communities).In the 19th and early 20th centuries, Jewish merchants from around the world began to trade in Chinese ports, particularly in the commercial centres of Hong Kong, which was for a time a British colony; Shanghai (the International Settlement and French Concession); and Harbin (the Trans-Siberian Railway). In the first half of the 20th century, thousands of Jewish refugees escaping from the 1917 Russian Revolution arrived in China. By the time of the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949, only a few Chinese Jews were known to have maintained the practice of their religion and culture though the Kaifeng synagogue survived for around seven centuries until 1860. China's Jewish communities have been ethnically diverse ranging from the Jews of Kaifeng and other places during the history of Imperial China, who, it is reported, came to be more or less totally assimilated into the majority Han Chinese populace due to widespread intermarriage.Another wave of 18,000 Jews from Germany, Austria, and Poland immigrated to Shanghai in the late 1930s and early 1940s. Shanghai was an open city at the time and it did not have restrictions on immigration, and some Chinese diplomats such as Ho Feng Shan issued "protective" passports and the Japanese diplomat Chiune Sugihara issued transit visas with which refugees could go to Shanghai after a short stay in Japan. In 1943, the occupying Japanese army required these 18,000 Jews, formally known as "stateless refugees," to relocate to an area of 0.75 square miles (1.9 km) in Shanghai's Hongkew district (today known as the Hongkou District) where many lived in group homes called "Heime". The total number of Jews who entered Shanghai during this period equaled the total number of Jews who fled to Australia, Canada, India, New Zealand and South Africa combined. Many of the Jews in China later moved to found the modern state of Israel.”https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_ChinaFrom that background, in current history, China and Israel have been trading partners. If you include Hong Kong, China is second only to the US in trade for both exports and imports. Israel has provided China with military and civilian technologies to America’s dismay. Israel is also seeking a place in the SCO.https://globaledge.msu.edu/countries/israel/tradestatshttps://www.newsweek.com/china-israel-military-technology-beijing-jerusalem-saul-eisenberg-weapons-607117“In March 2017, President Xi Jinping of China hosted two important visitors from the Middle East. The first was King Salman of Saudi Arabia, whose country’s oil supplies are crucial to China’s energy and economic outlook. The second was Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.Unlike Saudi Arabia—or Iran, or Iraq—Israel is one Middle Eastern country with no oil to offer China. Nor does it count China among the many customers for Israeli arms exports; to that prospectively lucrative arrangement, a 2005 dispute with the United States closed the door. Nor is there a large expatriate Chinese population in Israel clamoring for good relations with Beijing. Nor, in China itself, is there a Jewish community of any size whose interests an Israeli prime minister might deem a fit topic to bring up with his Chinese counterpart.Nonetheless, Netanyahu’s appearance in Beijing was more than a courtesy call, or an opportunity to discuss with an interested third party the changing shape of Israel-Arab relations (in which, coincidentally, the growing thaw between Jerusalem and Riyadh was playing a prime role). Instead, the visit was a ratifying event in one of the fastest-growing and most remarkable economic and political partnerships of the past two decades.In a joint statement after the visit, Netanyahu and Xi pledged increased cooperation in areas including “air-pollution control, waste management, environmental monitoring, water conservation and purification, as well as high-tech fields.” The statement also announced plans to create “a global technology center” and other joint projects in the area of innovation, with a standing invitation to Chinese companies to join in a variety of infrastructure projects within Israel itself. For his part, Netanyahu also expressed interest in Israel’s joining China’s massive multi-billion-dollar One Belt One Road project, and in signing a free-trade agreement between the two countries.Strikingly, the joint statement said very little about the usual Middle East political issues—this, despite China’s recent announcement of its by no means Israel-friendly “Four-Point Peace Plan” between Israel and the Palestinians. Instead, Netanyahu cordially encouraged China’s quest “to assume its rightful place . . . on the world stage,” adding that, for this effort, “We are your perfect junior partner. . . . I believe this is a marriage made in heaven.”There is certainly no denying that, in terms of trade and investment alone, the burgeoning economic partnership between Israel and China has at least the potential of transforming not only Israel itself but also Israel’s position vis-à-vis the rest of the Middle East—and most notably vis-à-vis Iran, which happens to be Beijing’s other key partner in the region. Inevitably, it could also have an impact on Israel’s relations with the United States.But is this a marriage made in heaven? Or is it something else?Weighing the answer to that question involves probing beneath the two countries’ currently successful dynamic of trade and commercial transactions to their respective geopolitical agendas. When it comes to Israel, the acknowledged junior partner, it also requires examining whether and how the relationship with China could become a dependency. Such a change might please Beijing, but it would impose on Israeli national security a new kind of vulnerability, one very different from the challenges it has faced successfully in the past.I. Israel Turns toward ChinaChina and Israel established diplomatic relations in 1992, under the respective leadership of Deng Xiaoping and Yitzḥak Rabin. But the growth of Chinese investment in Israel and the expansion of Israeli business in China are products of the last decade and especially of the last few years. In 2016, for example, China’s annual direct investment in Israel almost tripled from the previous year to $16 billion. During Netanyahu’s March visit last year, the two countries signed no fewer than ten bilateral business agreements amounting to a total value of $25 billion. At this rate, China could soon overtake the U.S. as the number-one source of overseas investment in Israel.From Israel’s point of view, a turn toward China made good economic sense. At a point when the U.S. and Europe were still recovering from the 2008 financial crisis and growing at a snail’s pace, and when Europe’s relationship with the Jewish state was becoming increasingly tainted by anti-Semitism, Asia in general and China in particular looked like safe bets for trade.Today, some Israelis see the Chinese connection in larger and rosier terms. To Alexander Pevzner, the founding director of the Chinese Media Center in Israel and a senior adviser to China’s Silk Road Group, “the huge potential going forward is evident.” As he framed it in the Jerusalem Post:Both Israel and China are ancient civilizations but new countries, established within a year of each other. . . . From academia to tourism, from business to culture, relations on both the governmental and non-governmental level have been developing at an astounding pace, creating a sea change not only in bilateral ties but in Israel’s position in Asia in general. Despite the wide gap in size and population, this relationship is a win-win.One might suppose a thoughtful Israeli would have paused before comparing the 1949 founding of the People’s Republic of China, which led to the murder of millions in Mao’s purges and the deaths of tens of millions more in his Great Leap Forward, with the 1948 founding of Israel. Nor, as Elliott Abrams stresses in a recent report for the Council on Foreign Relations, are the two countries today in any way natural partners; in fact, from the point of view of “sheer size, demography, and geopolitical orientation, they appear vastly different.”Yet there is no denying that both sides see the relationship as mutually beneficial—and both seem eager to extend it. More than 1,000 Israeli companies are now doing business in China, and many of them are specifically tailoring their products to the Chinese market. Israel is also now a member of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)—a multinational consortium aimed at making China as powerful a global financial player as the United States.Jerusalem has even made gestures toward becoming a member of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), Beijing’s bid to create a network of strategic cooperation and coordination, similar to NATO, extending from East and Central Asia to the doorstep of the Middle East. Current members of SCO include Russia, India, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan. Among the observer nations is Iran.Behind this relatively sudden leap forward is, as Abrams notes, Israel’s well-deserved reputation as a hub of innovation, entrepreneurship, and research, which it has leveraged as a drawing card for a number of Asian countries, including India and Japan as well as China. The image of Israel as the Start-Up Nation is especially attractive to China, with its long history of an economy dominated, or more accurately burdened, by state-owned companies. President Xi’s “Made in China 2025,” a visionary agenda announced at the 19th Communist-party congress a year ago, is explicitly aimed at developing a strong, entrepreneur-based economy, and both he and others responsible for China’s economic future have publicly articulated the hope that the Israeli entrepreneurial spirit will “rub off” on their own businesses and executives.Israelis are poised to reciprocate. Just as China “is set on learning as much as it can in order to position itself as an innovation economy,” says Hagai Tal, chief executive of the Israeli mobile-advertising company Taptica, so Israeli companies “see important opportunities in the East—and the meeting point of these two approaches is what produces such successful business partnerships.”How successful? Annual trade between the two countries has now surpassed $11 billion, a small figure when compared with China’s trade with the United States or Europe but fully 200 times larger than it was at the establishment of diplomatic relations in 1992. (In the same period, American trade with China grew only twenty times larger.) Chinese investment money has also moved aggressively into Israeli markets, from food technology and environmental and health products to computers and lasers.The first major corporate foray of this kind was the 2014 acquisition of Tnuva, the largest Israeli dairy company, by China’s Bright Foods, followed four years later by the purchase of Ahava, maker of Dead Sea cosmetics, by the Chinese conglomerate Fosun.But nothing attracts China’s attention like Israel’s high-tech sector. The wave began in early 2010 with Yifang Digital buying up Pegasus Technologies, which develops and sells a digital pen for computers. Since 2014, Israeli companies snapped up by Chinese investors include TravelFusion, Natali HealthCare Solutions, and Alma Lasers. Meanwhile, Chinese Internet leviathans like Alibaba, Baidu, and Tencent Holdings are trolling for Israeli start-ups that can help them build new technologies to compete with Google and Apple.The flow of Chinese venture capital shows no signs of letting up. To help bring Israeli and Chinese companies together, a number of joint business events are now held regularly, and the mutual interest in research has also spilled over into academic cooperation.Last May, Alibaba’s founder and CEO Jack Ma and 35 other Chinese executives visited Israel with an eye (according to Israeli media) of setting up a major Alibaba research hub in the country. In 2014, Tel Aviv University announced that it would partner with Tsinghua University in Beijing to build the CIN Research Center with a focus on biotech, solar, water, and environmental technology. Two years later, the University of Haifa announced plans to build a joint laboratory at East China Normal University in Shanghai to research ecology, data, biomedicine, and neurobiology; all funding was provided by the Chinese government. In December 2017, an arrangement between Haifa’s Technion and Shantou University in southern China, funded by a $130-million grant from the Li Ka-shing Foundation and further bolstered by local public monies in China, came to fruition with the opening in Shantou of a joint campus for technological research.On the Israeli side, academic interest in Chinese culture and civilization has burgeoned via Asian-studies programs at the University of Haifa, Bar Ilan University, and Tel Hai College. Chinese government-funded Confucius Institutes—one of the major conduits of pro-Beijing information and propaganda around the world—now operate at both the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv University.Daniel Galily, an Israeli expatriate who has lectured in business at Beijing Geely University, sees a perfect complementarity at work in this growing meeting of Israeli and Chinese minds:The educational system in China places great emphasis on discipline and obedience to superiors, while the Israeli educational system and the Israeli army encourage students and soldiers to think about new ideas, and to solve problems in situations of uncertainty.Thus do the Chinese integrate Israeli creativity and innovation into their business enterprises while Israeli start-ups and entrepreneurs learn from their Chinese partners about long-term horizons and workforce organization.The arrangement may not be perfectly symmetrical, but few are pausing to contemplate its potential imbalances—a judgment that can be made about more than one aspect of this marriage.II. Deeper than BusinessIndeed, the China-Israel relationship runs much deeper than business. China has taken on a staggering number of infrastructure projects around the world in recent years, and Israel is one of its important venues.“This is an historic moment,” Prime Minister Netanyahu announced a year ago as he and Chinese executives laid the cornerstone of a new multi-million-dollar seaport at Ashdod being built by a Beijing-based harbor-construction firm. At $3 billion, this is one of the biggest overseas investment projects in Israel, ever—and also one of the biggest for the Chinese company, China Harbor Engineering.Ashdod on the Mediterranean coast is the destination of fully 90 percent of Israel’s international maritime traffic. Officials claim the new harbor will expand Israel’s ability to meet growing demand—including, it seems, from Chinese vessels stopping in Israel. For the Ashdod project also forms part of the vast overseas-development plan unveiled by Xi at the Boao Forum for Asia in March: the Silk Road Economic Belt and Maritime Silk Road. The plan, according to the Chinese news agency Xinhua, “is expected to change the world political and economic landscape through development of countries along the route, most of which are eager for fresh growth.”For Israel, one of those presumably eager countries, Beijing has very special plans. It sees the Jewish state as an important link in the even larger China-dominated trading chain mentioned earlier: the One Belt One Road Initiative (OBOR) extending from the Indian Ocean and central Asia across the Middle East and thence to Europe. Xi hopes that OBOR will generate $2.5 trillion in trade for China over the next decade, with Ashdod serving as a crucial port of destination for seaborne trade with Europe.As a partner in construction projects, China brings big advantages: large pools of available capital, shorter set-up time, and faster construction of plant and infrastructure projects, often carried out by Chinese workforces brought in for the purpose. In Israel alone, according to a report by Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies, “China is involved in . . . digging the Carmel tunnels in Haifa, laying the light rail in Tel Aviv, and expanding [both] the Ashdod and Haifa seaports”—and is also entering the residential construction industry.One outstanding example of Chinese capital helping to meet Israeli needs while also serving larger Chinese interests is Beijing’s involvement in the so-called “Red-Med” project, a 300-kilometer rail line linking the port city of Ashkelon, just fifteen miles south of Ashdod, to the Red Sea. The Israeli government, which has deemed “Red-Med” economically essential to the country’s future, responded enthusiastically to China’s offer to provide experienced labor and an approximately $2-billion investment. From China’s perspective, however, “Red-Med” forms only one node, albeit an important one, in the network of high-speed rail lines it intends to build across Southeast Asia, Africa, and the Middle East as well as in China itself.In short, OBOR subsumes Israel-based infrastructure projects like the Haifa and Ashdod port constructions and Red-Med within an ambitious trans-Asian strategy to pursue three key resources for China’s future greatness: petrochemicals, consumer markets, and advanced technology.Chinese military officials and their Israeli counterparts renewed their security relationship in a first-time visit to Israel by a delegation of Chinese military officials, and seven months later in a reciprocal IDF visit to China led by Brigadier General Avi Benayahu. The latter resulted in an agreement to provide select training for PLA officers at IDF facilities.Subsequently, the PLA’s chief of staff, General Chen Bingde, visited Israel to open discussions on joint manufacture of commercial-aircraft components, and in January 2016 Israel Aerospace Industries announced the formation of a joint venture with the Lingyun (Yichang) Science and Technology Group to establish a local maintenance, repair, and overhaul enterprise in Hubei Province—the first truly public instance of cooperation between the Israeli and Chinese defense sectors since the cancellation of the Harpy upgrade.Throughout, Israel has been careful to abide by the agreement with Washington not to sell defense equipment to China. That agreement, however, does not prevent the Israeli military from buying equipment from China. Reportedly, both the IDF and the Israeli police have purchased Chinese-made drones that take part in non-classified operations by Israeli ground forces; the IDF has reportedly sought as well to acquire 200 additional drones and spare parts pending completion of a project to develop an Israel-made drone with similar capabilities.This, too, is a breakthrough: the first time actual Chinese defense equipment has been used by Israeli security forces. There is no reason to believe it will be the last.”https://www.hudson.org/research/14663-israel-and-china-take-a-leap-forward-but-to-whereIsrael is known for its business acumen, same for the Chinese. It would seem they are cut from the same cloth. Maybe that characteristic makes China and Israel's relationship symbiotic and natural.

If scientists had no theory of evolution still today, but had all of our knowledge of genetics and geology, could we work from that information to draw conclusions about the fossil record and 'discover' or 'conclude' Darwinian evolution?

If not Evolution” they would embrace another equally ridiculous “Theory”.This is how the dictionary defines the word upon which all of science stands.Theory - noun the•o•ry \ˈthē-ə-rē, ˈthir-ē\ : an idea that is not known or proven to be true, a mere conjecture, or guessTo date, we have spent almost 200 years and an unlimited budget looking for evidence to support these “Theories”. Despite this, not even the staunchest supporters of these ideas can call them anything more than “Theories”.Why? - Because there is no credible evidence to support them.Despite this, for decades these “Theories” were taught as proven fact.But then over the last 10–15 years we developed the technology to truly test these “Theories”. Here is what we found.Universe shouldn’t exist, CERN physicists concludeCERN Research Finds "The Universe Should Not Actually Exist"Dark Matter - FailedDark Matter at the subatomic level - FailedThe LHC “Big Bang Detector” – FailedTo Date, Particle Supercollider Detects No Evidence Of Dark MatterBaBar at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory in Menlo Park, California - FailedScientists Narrow Down the Search for Dark Photons Using Decade-Old Particle Collider DataDark Matter explaining Star Movement – FailedA whirling plane of satellite galaxies around Centaurus A challenges cold dark matter cosmologyDark matter rival boosted by dwarf galaxiesIn the 1980s Mordehai Milgrom, then at Princeton University, tweaked Newton’s laws so that an object in a very weak gravitational field experiences a slightly stronger pull than Newton would have predicted. He showed that this revised version of gravity, now called MOND, can neatly describe the observed rotation of material in giant spiral galaxies without the need for dark matter.No Dark Matter in underground detectors.LUX (Large Underground Xenon) at the Sanford Underground Research Facility in South Dakota - FailedWorld's Most Sensitive Detector Fails To Find Dark MatterXENON1T at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory in Italy – FailedDark-Matter Hunt Fails to Find the Elusive ParticlesXENON100 at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory in Italy – FailedNo sign of seasonal dark matter after four years of searchingDEAP-3600 at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNOLAB) in Ontario Canada – Failedhttps://www.researchgate.net/pub...1707.08042] First results from the DEAP-3600 dark matter search with argon at SNOLABPICO at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNOLAB) in Ontario Canada – Failed[1702.07666] Dark Matter Search Results from the PICO-60 C$_3$F$_8$ Bubble ChamberDark Matter Remains Elusive, But Drexel Scientist on the CaseSuperCDMS at Soudan in Minnesota – Failed[1708.08869] Results from the Super Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (SuperCDMS) experiment at SoudanPandaX-II at the Jinping Underground Laboratory in Sichuan, China – FailedDark matter still missing[1708.06917] Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II ExperimentNo Dark Matter in Outer Space –Gamma Rays - FailedThe Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, formerly GLASTFermi Expands its Search for Dark MatterCosmic Rays – FailedStill No Dark Matter from Space Station ExperimentNo, there are no “hints” of dark matter in new experimental resultsNeutrinos - FailedIce Cube/DeepCore at the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station in Antarctica – FailedIceCube sets new best limits for dark matter searches in neutrino detectors[1705.08103] Search for Neutrinos from Dark Matter Self-Annihilations in the center of the Milky Way with 3 years of IceCube/DeepCoreIceCube, which has already searched for dark matter by looking for a neutrino flux that would be created in the annihilation of dark matter particles in the Sun, in the Milky Way, or even in nearby galaxies.Now the IceCube Collaboration has expanded these studies with a search for dark matter annihilations in the center of the Earth. Researchers have used one year of data—May 2011 to May 2Searching for dark matter in the EarthDark Energy – FailedDark Energy: The Biggest Mystery in the UniverseExtra Dimensions - FailedThe LHC's extra dimensionThe discovery of additional space–time dimensions would revolutionise physics, but after 20 years of dedicated searches at particle colliders, we have turned up empty handed.http://cerncourier.com/cws/artic...Using observations from the collision of two neutron stars that made headlines in 2017 (SN: 11/11/17, p. 6), scientists found no evidence of gravity leaking into hidden dimensions.Parallel Universes – Failedhttps://physicsworld.com/a/paral...Although they drew a blank, the researchers say that their experiment provides a simple, low-cost way of testing theories beyond the Standard Model of particle physics, and that the detector could be made significantly more sensitive in the future.No, the LHC will not make contact with parallel universesThe CMB – Failed (unless you believe the Earth is the Center of the Universe)Prof. Lawrence Krauss -when you look at CMB map, you also see that the structure that is observed, is in fact, in a weird way, correlated with the plane of the earth around the sun. Is this Copernicus coming back to haunt us? That's crazy. We're looking out at the whole universe. There's no way there should be a correlation of structure with our motion of the earth around the sun — the plane of the earth around the sun — the ecliptic. That would say we are truly the center of the universe.The new results are either telling us that all of science is wrong and we're the center of the universe, or maybe the data is simply incorrect,THE ENERGY OF EMPTY SPACE THAT ISN'T ZERO"Why characteristics of the CMB should relate to our solar system is not understood. ... I was explicitly told not to say anything about God in this talk "which I've just violated," Efstathiou said half jokingly.Planck probe's cosmic 'baby picture' revises universe's vital statisticsGeorge Efstathiou, Ph.D. is a Professor of Astrophysics at the University of Cambridge and director of the Kavli Institute for CosmologyWhy is the solar system cosmically aligned?http://www-personal.umich.edu/~h...At first, scientists simply laughed this off as some kind of fluke or mistake, because it just couldn't be real. Even though the findings were confirmed by looking back at the earlier COBE satellite data.Rather than admit what they had discovered, NASA tried to prove the WMAP satellite was broken. quote –So perplexing is the axis of evil that Hinshaw and WMAP's principal investigator, Chuck Bennett, have obtained a grant for a five-year examination of the WMAP data. They hope to explore the possibilities that the WMAP instrument was in error, or that something else went wrong. "There's no question there's stuff that looks unusual," says Bennett.We will have to wait and see whether the study reveals the axis of evil to be a cosmic mirage, or shows the big bang model to be in serious trouble.http://www.independent.co.uk/new...Atom Formation - FailedFusion experiments show that the Big Bang can't account for lithium.Replication of Big Bang reveals flaws in theory of atom formationString Theory - FailedString theory fails first major experimental testString Theory Now on Life Support | RealClearScienceString Theory Fails Another Test, the “Supertest”Supersymmetry – FailedScience at a crossroads as supersymmetry theory falls flatFirst high-energy LHC results: Supersymmetry still dead, watch for gravitonsInflation – FailedPhysicist Slams Cosmic Theory He Helped ConceiveBig Bang blunder bursts the multiverse bubbleThe LHC “nightmare scenario” has come true.“It’s striking that we’ve thought about these things for 30 years and we have not made one correct prediction that they have seen,” said Nima Arkani-Hamed, a professor of physics at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, NJWhat No New Particles Means for Physics | Quanta MagazineThe entirely fictional world that was constructed to explain what reality is made of turns out to not exist.There are no Selectrons, Photinos, Zinos, Neutralinos, Higgsinos, Leptoquarks, Gravitons, Squarks, Gluinos and on and on and on…Solar System Formation– FailedLeading Theory For How The Solar System Formed Just Disproved! (Synopsis)Death Spiral: Why Theorists Can’t Make Solar SystemsNew Discovery Casts Doubt on How The Solar System FormedStar Formation – FailedThe Big Problems in Star Formation: the Star Formation Rate, Stellar Clustering, and the Initial Mass Functionthe Star Formation Rate, Stellar Clustering, and the Initial Mass FunctionPopulation III stars: hidden or disappeared?hidden or disappeared ?Planet Formation – FailedWhy all we knew about planets is wrongAstronomy: Planets in chaosQuote-The field in its current state “doesn't make much sense”, says Norm Murray of the Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics in Toronto.Redshift = Distance - FailedUsing a three-meter telescope operated by the University of California at Lick Observatory in the mountains above San Jose and the university’s 10-meter Keck I telescope on Mauna Kea in Hawaii, she and her team measured the redshifts of the spiral galaxy and quasar and found that the quasar appears to be interacting with the interstellar gas within the galaxy.http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/archive...Discovery Poses Cosmic Puzzle: Can A 'Distant' Quasar Lie Within A Nearby Galaxy?Hubble ‘Constant’ - FailedThe Hubble “Constant” is the rate of expansion of the universe that you are told proves it’s age. Here is what science has measured and calls a “constant”. Each different measurement yields a different age.To a certain degree, you can excuse some of these ages because of the technology of the day, but things have NOT gotten better, with more recent technology.If you notice the HUGE error bars in these measurements, you wonder why they even bother to publish these papers.But now the results of the latest technology produces dates WELL OUTSIDE THE MARGIN OF ERROR of each other.The Hubble constant, when measured directly from observed redshifts and distances, is very different than when obtained by multi-parameter fits to the cosmic microwave background.Could the Hunt for Hubble's Constant Overturn the Standard Model of Cosmology?From the Planck CMB data= 67.8 ± 0.9 km/s/MpcFrom Hubble Telescope = 73.24 ± 1.74 km/s/MpcThere is absolutely ZERO evidence of evolution anywhere on Earth or in the entire universe for that matter. Physicists actually have a name for this inconvenient little fact.They call it the HORIZON PROBLEM. Meaning that everywhere we look, anywhere on the horizon of the entire universe, there is nothing different.There is zero cosmic evolution of any kind.In a 360 degree sphere, which is supposedly 96 billion light years in range, that is observable from the Earth. Nothing has “evolved” differently. In fact, the only unique thing we have observed in the entire universe - is US!Zero evidence, is why we call it, The “THEORY” of Evolution and not The “FACT” of Evolution.From the early 1970’s until 2005 world governments taught that Humans and Chimps shared 99% similar DNA.Which is strange, because we did not have a sequenced Human Genome to compare to sequenced Chimp Genome until 2005.When the data was compared, it turned out that HUMANS AND CHIMPS ARE NOT REMOTELY GENETICALLY SIMILAR!So…how did “Science” deal with this?The Chimp Genome is approximately 8% larger having about 3.3 Billion Base Pairs for the Chimp to 3.1 Billion Base Pairs for the Human.So the “Scientists” THREW OUT ALL THE DIFFERENCES and only compared what was left over.They only compared 2.4 Billion Base Pairs from each species.BUT THE CORRUPTION GOES FAR BEYOND THIS.You see, the “Chimp Genome” isn’t a “Chimp Genome” at all, it’s a Human Genome with some Chimp DNA inserted.To Quote -Supplementary Notes: Genome Sequencing and Assembly (2005-03-03208)Human genome sequence (NCBI build 34) was also used in a limited fashion. We created two distinct assemblies, one called the modified de novo assembly (MDN) and the other called the validated chimpanzee-on-human assembly (VCH). We then performed a partial merger to obtain the final assembly described by the Consortium.So after inserting Chimp DNA into Human DNA and then rearranging it be similar..and finding out that it still wasn’t similar to a Human Genome, they threw away what they didn’t like and made this announcement to the world.Chimps, Humans 96 Percent the Same, Gene Study Findshttps://www.genome.gov/15515096/...You did not evolve from a monkey or anything else.In this video, the World’s Top Genetic Scientist explains that Darwin’s Tree of Life is a Fiction –Your government and educators have been lying to you about everything.We don’t even have 90% of the human genome sequenced, how can it be 96% similar to anything?Psst, the human genome was never completely sequencedWorse still, we don’t even know how DNA really works much less how to compare it to anything.If you take a strand of your hair, one of your teeth or some of your urine, all will have EXACTLY THE SAME DNA. But are your teeth and your urine exactly the same thing?How can we say something is 96% similar, when we can’t explain how something that is 100% similar, turns out to be different, in the real world?But what about fossil proof?The - “Why Evolution is True” website calls Harvard Professor Stephen Jay Gould, “probably the most prominent evolutionary biologist of our time”Stephen Jay GouldBut Prof. Gould has this to say about the fossil “evidence” that supports evolution.“The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils. Yet Darwin was so wedded to gradualism that he wagered his entire theory on a denial of this literal record:"The geological record is extremely imperfect and this fact will to a large extent explain why we do not find interminable varieties, connecting together all the extinct and existing forms of life by the finest graduated steps, He who rejects these views on the nature of the geological record, will rightly reject my whole theory."Darwin's argument still persists as the favored escape of most paleontologists from the embarrassment of a record that seems to show so little of evolution. In exposing its cultural and methodological roots, I wish in no way to impugn the potential validity of gradualism (for all general views have similar roots). I wish only to point out that it was never -seen- in the rocks.Paleontologists have paid an exorbitant price for Darwin's argument. We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life*s history, yet to pre- serve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.[Evolution’s Erratic Pace - "Natural History,"] ”A quote by Stephen Jay Gould(1) Stasis. Most species exhibit no directional change during their tenure on earth. They appear in the fossil record looking much the same as when they disappear; morphological change is usually limited and directionless.(2) Sudden appearance. In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and 'fully formed.'6.5: Stephen Jay Gould and Niles EldredgeNone of this is compatible with 4.5 billion years worth of evolution evidence, which should be found in every part of the Earth.Instead we are presented with tiny fragments of highly disputed so-called “evidence”, which invariably turns out to be fraudulent.Scientific American -The Missing Link that Wasn’tHow Fake Fossils Pervert Paleontology [Excerpt]Is it a bird? Is it a dinosaur? No, it's a fakeThe great dinosaur fossil hoaxIf 4.5 billion years of “evolution” had occurred, there should be undeniable evidence everywhere.It should be as common as grass, sand or water.But the very fact that evolutionists use highly disputed, extremely questionable data to make worldwide headlines before retracting them a few months later, proves how non-existent this evidence is…A 'transitional fossil' debunkedTall tail: Morocco casts doubt on Mexico 'dinosaur' fragmentDo you believe the Earth is old based on Radiometric Dating?Maybe you should learn how that Fairy Tale really works.William D. Stansfield Prof. Biological Sciences, California Polytechnic State UniversityBook -The Science of Evolution, Page 84It is obvious that radiometric techniques may not be the absolute dating methods that they are claimed to be. Age estimates on a given geological stratum by different radiometric methods are often quite different (sometimes by hundreds of millions of years). There is no absolutely reliable long-term radiological "clock." The uncertainties inherent in radiometric dating are disturbing to geologists and evolutionistsDISCORDANT U-PB AGES AND MINERAL TYPE*J. Laurence Kulp and Walter R. Eckelmann, Lamont GeoIogical Observatory (Columbia University), Palisades, New York.The lack of agreement among the ages derived from the isotopic ratios of uranium, thorium and lead is one of the most important problems in geochronometry.http://www.minsocam.org/ammin/AM42/AM42_154.pdfHere the US Geologic Survey tells us -How do we know the Age of the Earth?The oldest Moon rocks are from the lunar highlands and were formed when the early lunar crust was partially or entirely molten. These rocks, of which only a few were returned by the Apollo missions, have been dated by two methods at between 4.4-4.5 billion years in age.USGS Geology and GeophysicsEXCEPT THAT IS A LIE!That is not the reported age of the lunar rocks.In the nine papers published by the scientists NASA hand picked to study and date the first lunar rocks (and thus date the Earth).Vast differences in ages were recorded for the same samples in the nine papers.Lunar Sample # 10017 was reported to have 19 different ages.But my favorite, was Lunar Sample # 10084 which was determined to be 8.2 billion years old.To quote from - Age determinations and isotopic abundance measurements on lunar samples. Wanless RK, Loveridge WD, Stevens RD.…an extremely discordant age pattern ranging from 4670 m.y. for the 207Pb/206Pb ratio to 8200 m.y. for the 208Pb/232Th ratio is found….http://adsbit.harvard.edu/full/1...As noted, our results were CORRECTED to account for the blank determined with the extraction and hence any modern lead component must in fact represent a CONTAMINANT in our sample. TATSUMOTO and ROSHOLT (1970) pre-treated their samples by washing in double-distilled acetone but this was not done in our laboratory since, as stated at the outset, WE WISHED TO OBTAIN DATA FOR THE ESSENTIALLY UNALTERED LUNAR MATERIAL.While the modification to the lead isotope values served to bring the Pb-Pb and Pb-U ages into general accord the Pb-Th remained discordantly high near 6.9 Billion years.1970GeCAS...1.1729W Page 1736And there you have the perfect example of how radiometric dating really works.First, they test UNALTERED rocks, get results that can’t be accepted, and then they PERVERT the rocks, they call this process CORRECTING the rocks.When even this despicable process can’t produce the predetermined results they wanted to achieve, they simply ignore the results they don’t like and don’t report them in their findings.There is no Astronomical evidence of Evolution. There is no Genetic evidence of Evolution. There is no Fossil evidence of Evolution. But people will “believe” anything to hide from the truth.

How do you find an honest way to believe in the Bible and its timeline for creation, and also believe that man has been around and evolved over millions of years?

Other than Hitler telling you that Jews have caused all our problems, what proof do you have?Other than Hitler telling you “Man has evolved for millions of years.”, what proof do you have?A Nobel Prize is worth about 1 Million Dollars.A Fundamental Physics Breakthrough Prize is worth 3 Million Dollars.So that’s a guaranteed 4 Million Dollar prize if you can produce one shred of evidence that proves what you ignorantly say makes up 96% of the universe actually exists or in any way explains how it works.Just directly detect any of these things and BOOOOM!!! 4 Million Dollars.Dark Energy, about 73% of the universe…Dark Matter, about 23% of the universe…Inflaton FieldBig Bang Created Magnetic Monopoles or other high energy relicThe Missing Anti-MatterParallel UniversesAlternate DimensionsExplain what “Banged”.Explain why it “Banged”.Explain what powered the “Bang”.Explain what stopped the “Bang”.Explain the “Higgs” MassThere is more evidence the Tooth Fairy exists than what you claim makes up the universe,And if I’m wrong..PROVE IT, there is 4 Million Dollars available if you can.Everything you believe is real has a word attached to it. THEORYThe word is literally defined in the dictionary as meaning - an idea that as yet has NO PROOF to support it, a guess, a mere conjecture.Zero evidence, is why we call it, The “THEORY” of Evolution and not The “FACT” of Evolution.From the early 1970’s until 2005 world governments taught that Humans and Chimps shared 99% similar DNA.In this Video the World’s Top Genetic Scientist explains that Darwin’s Tree of Life is a Fiction –You are not remotely genetically similar to a chimp. This is why, in the real world, we don’t conduct medical testing on Chimps. It’s pointless.But from the early 1970’s until 2005, the World’s Governments taught that Humans and Chimps shared 99% similar DNA.Which is strange, because we did not have a sequenced Human Genome to compare to sequenced Chimp Genome until 2005.When the data was compared, it turned out that HUMANS AND CHIMPS ARE NOT REMOTELY GENETICALLY SIMILAR!The “Scientists” THREW OUT ALL THE DIFFERENCES and only compared the cherry-picked similar parts that were left over.The Chimp Genome has approximately 3.3 Billion Base Pairs.The Human Genome has approximately 3.1 Billion Base Pairs.The “Scientists” only compared 2.4 Billion Base Pairs from each species.BUT THE CORRUPTION GOES FAR BEYOND THIS.You see, the “Chimp Genome” isn’t a “Chimp Genome” at all, it’s a Human Genome with some Chimp DNA inserted.To Quote -Supplementary Notes: Genome Sequencing and Assembly (2005-03-03208)Human genome sequence (NCBI build 34) was also used in a limited fashion. We created two distinct assemblies, one called the modified de novo assembly (MDN) and the other called the validated chimpanzee-on-human assembly (VCH). We then performed a partial merger to obtain the final assembly described by the Consortium.So after inserting Chimp DNA into Human DNA and then rearranging it be similar..and finding out that it still wasn’t similar to a Human Genome, they threw away what they didn’t like and made this announcement to the world.Chimps, Humans 96 Percent the Same, Gene Study FindsYour government and educators have been lying to you about everything.We don’t even have 90% of the human genome sequenced, how can it be 96% similar to anything?Psst, the human genome was never completely sequencedWorse still, we don’t even know how DNA really works much less how to compare it to anything.If you take a strand of your hair, one of your teeth or some of your urine, all will have EXACTLY THE SAME DNA. But are your teeth and your urine exactly the same thing?How can we say something is 96% similar, when we can’t explain how something that is 100% similar, turns out to be different, in the real world?But what about fossil proof?The - “Why Evolution is True” website calls Harvard Professor Stephen Jay Gould, “probably the most prominent evolutionary biologist of our time”Stephen Jay GouldBut Prof. Gould has this to say about the fossil “evidence” that supports evolution.“The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils. Yet Darwin was so wedded to gradualism that he wagered his entire theory on a denial of this literal record:"The geological record is extremely imperfect and this fact will to a large extent explain why we do not find interminable varieties, connecting together all the extinct and existing forms of life by the finest graduated steps, He who rejects these views on the nature of the geological record, will rightly reject my whole theory."Darwin's argument still persists as the favored escape of most paleontologists from the embarrassment of a record that seems to show so little of evolution. In exposing its cultural and methodological roots, I wish in no way to impugn the potential validity of gradualism (for all general views have similar roots). I wish only to point out that it was never -seen- in the rocks.Paleontologists have paid an exorbitant price for Darwin's argument. We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life*s history, yet to pre- serve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.[Evolution’s Erratic Pace - "Natural History,"] ”A quote by Stephen Jay Gould(1) Stasis. Most species exhibit no directional change during their tenure on earth. They appear in the fossil record looking much the same as when they disappear; morphological change is usually limited and directionless.(2) Sudden appearance. In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and 'fully formed.'6.5: Stephen Jay Gould and Niles EldredgeNone of this is compatible with 4.5 billion years worth of evolution evidence, which should be found in every part of the Earth.Instead we are presented with tiny fragments of highly disputed so-called “evidence”, which invariably turns out to be fraudulent.Scientific American -The Missing Link that Wasn’tHow Fake Fossils Pervert Paleontology [Excerpt]Is it a bird? Is it a dinosaur? No, it's a fakeThe great dinosaur fossil hoaxIf 4.5 billion years of “evolution” had occurred, there should be undeniable evidence everywhere.It should be as common as grass, sand or water.But the very fact that evolutionists use highly disputed, extremely questionable data to make worldwide headlines before retracting them a few months later, proves how non-existent this evidence is…A 'transitional fossil' debunkedTall tail: Morocco casts doubt on Mexico 'dinosaur' fragmentThere is no Genetic evidence of Evolution. There is no Fossil evidence of Evolution.Do you believe the Earth is old based on Radiometric Dating?Maybe you should learn how that Fairy Tale really works.William D. Stansfield Prof. Biological Sciences, California Polytechnic State UniversityBook -The Science of Evolution, Page 84It is obvious that radiometric techniques may not be the absolute dating methods that they are claimed to be. Age estimates on a given geological stratum by different radiometric methods are often quite different (sometimes by hundreds of millions of years). There is no absolutely reliable long-term radiological "clock." The uncertainties inherent in radiometric dating are disturbing to geologists and evolutionistsDISCORDANT U-PB AGES AND MINERAL TYPE*J. Laurence Kulp and Walter R. Eckelmann, Lamont GeoIogical Observatory (Columbia University), Palisades, New York.The lack of agreement among the ages derived from the isotopic ratios of uranium, thorium and lead is one of the most important problems in geochronometry.http://www.minsocam.org/ammin/AM...Here the US Geologic Survey tells us -How do we know the Age of the Earth?The oldest Moon rocks are from the lunar highlands and were formed when the early lunar crust was partially or entirely molten. These rocks, of which only a few were returned by the Apollo missions, have been dated by two methods at between 4.4-4.5 billion years in age.USGS Geology and GeophysicsEXCEPT THAT IS A LIE!That is not the reported age of the lunar rocks.In the nine papers published by the scientists NASA hand picked to study and date the first lunar rocks (and thus date the Earth).Vast differences in ages were recorded for the same samples in the nine papers.Lunar Sample # 10017 was reported to have 19 different ages.But my favorite, was Lunar Sample # 10084 which was determined to be 8.2 billion years old.To quote from - Age determinations and isotopic abundance measurements on lunar samples. Wanless RK, Loveridge WD, Stevens RD.…an extremely discordant age pattern ranging from 4670 m.y. for the 207Pb/206Pb ratio to 8200 m.y. for the 208Pb/232Th ratio is found….http://adsbit.harvard.edu/full/1...As noted, our results were CORRECTED to account for the blank determined with the extraction and hence any modern lead component must in fact represent a CONTAMINANT in our sample. TATSUMOTO and ROSHOLT (1970) pre-treated their samples by washing in double-distilled acetone but this was not done in our laboratory since, as stated at the outset, WE WISHED TO OBTAIN DATA FOR THE ESSENTIALLY UNALTERED LUNAR MATERIAL.While the modification to the lead isotope values served to bring the Pb-Pb and Pb-U ages into general accord the Pb-Th remained discordantly high near 6.9 Billion years.1970GeCAS...1.1729W Page 1736And there you have the perfect example of how radiometric dating really works.First, they test UNALTERED rocks, get results that can’t be accepted, and then they PERVERT the rocks, they call this process CORRECTING the rocks.When even this despicable process can’t produce the predetermined results they wanted to achieve, they simply ignore the results they don’t like and don’t report them in their findings.Everything you have ever been taught will not stand up to you deciding to no longer allow the Hitlers of the world to tell you what to think.

People Like Us

CocoDoc is a web application that allows you to convert and compress files in PDF format to other formats and vice versa. It does not install any software. It's easy to use and you can import files from the cloud, your PC or directly your Microsoft Office accounts like Word, Excel, Powerpoint and also images.

Justin Miller