Budget Amendment Form Word: Fill & Download for Free

Most Democrats are against a balanced budget amendment because it's a usually trotted out as a Republican trick to hamstring the government to affect policy that would be agreeable to their party (i.e. "defending traditional marriage" by way of an amendment). Most Democrats say, "Congress has a duty; the American people have a vote in the matter. If the budget isn't balanced, then it's for a good reason."This is not always the case, but I'm deeply suspicious of anything the GOP offers as if they're trying to do something "for the good of the country". The good of the country means that you don't get your way unless you have total dominance of the three policy making bodies (House, Senate, POTUS). If not, then the word is "compromise".I'm one of the few people who is liberal, who votes mostly Democrat who might be willing to go along with a balanced budget amendment, so long as the wording includes this:Congress shall submit a budget every two years, that budget must be balanced within 10% of revenue.Any time the budget is not balanced within 10% of revenue, the President of the United States shall have unilateral authority to raise taxes and duties; to cut the budget anywhere at his or her discretion BUT ONLY in so far as to bring the budget within balance of 10% under revenue (though the President may, should he or she see fit, by the same means, bring the budget to perfect balance).Congress may override this provision provided 65% of each house of the Congress is in agreement. The President may veto the measure without any means of override.There. Include that, and I'll totally go along with it.

Yes, but the time isn’t right.America is too divided, too polarized right now to accomplish what would need to be accomplished in order to make real change to the Constitution.The two ways to go about working on an update are the congressional method or the constitutional convention method. Both would theoretically result in one or more amendments to update the Constitution.The way all 27 amendments to the constitution so far have been made is through the Congressional process.Congress proposes an amendment, which must be approved with a 2/3 majority in both houses of Congress. So you need 66 Senators, AND 288 members of the House of Representatives to agree on a proposed amendment.Once that’s done, the national archivist sends it to the governor of each state who then sends it to their state legislatures. 3/4 of the state legislatures must vote to ratify the proposed amendment, in other words, 38 states have to ratify.Now. Can you imagine that much agreement in Congress OR the states when it comes to something as game-changing as a constitutional amendment?The other way to go about it is to call a Constitutional Convention. In order for that to happen, first, 34 states must petition Congress to call a Convention.Any Amendment proposed at such a convention must be ratified by 3/4 of the states, again 38 states have to agree.Here’s how the whole thing reads:The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.Right now, 30 State Legislatures are controlled by Republicans, 18 by Democrats and 2 are split.So. Think about what you’re trying to accomplish with a Convention or with amendments proposed by Congress.Never mind how split down the middle Congress is:Think you can get 20 Republican Controlled states to jettison the Electoral College or reword the 2nd amendment?Think you can get Eight Democratic States to agree to a balanced budget amendment or to clarify the 14th so that it can’t be interpreted to include a right to a private conversation between a woman and her doctor? Or to add jus sanguinis as a requirement for citizenship?Yes, The Constitution needs to be looked at and updated. The Founding fathers knew that would be the case, it’s why Article V is in it.But in order to accomplish that, first, we have to work on our divisions.

When most of the people in most of the States want to Amend the Constitution, it will be Amended.That is what I don’t get about these questions. How do people think this works over here? Updating to reflect a modern America can happen at any time. The updates are called Amendments. Amendments can even reverse the Highest Courts.But, do they think this is a stagnant Constitution in a stagnate process? Even some of the answers seem to suggest the Constitution is written in stone, somehow.No, it is written in something even more powerful. It is written in the Will of the People.And us People are not just sitting here. We are active. About 100 Amendments are proposed EVERY YEAR.List of proposed amendments to the United States Constitution - WikipediaFrom 1789 through January 3, 2017, approximately 11,699 measures have been proposed to amend the United States Constitution.Collectively, members of the House and Senate typically propose around 200 amendments during each two–year term of Congress.An open letter to the world here. We are in charge of this. We change the Constitution when we Will it so. And We do change it. Courts then re-rule on the application of law beneath it.All the thinkers that want to tinker should understand one thing. This Constitution is designed so it can’t be re-written, as it requires 3/4 of the States to change even a single word. There cannot be a new draft document voted on, or anything resembling a re-write Committee. We consider that, insurrection against the People.It takes an Article V Convention and even then, Article V requires the Senate and equal State representation in the Senate to stay intact. That makes it technically impossible to do a complete re-write, even in a Convention. And in fact, we cannot even agree on a Balanced Budget Amendment. The ratification has been repelled in 4 States recently.The US Constitution must be Amended, and even that is almost impossible, lately. So, tough nuts.