Principal Pool Nyc Doe: Fill & Download for Free

This answer might piss some liberals off…If we look at Northern cities’ modern desegregation status…Still not even today.This picture was taken April 5, 1976. The man with the flag is attacking a black man…over a new Massachusetts law desegregating state schools and white folk literally rioted.New York in the 1960s had similar issues with busing, though it didn’t escalate into riots like in Boston in the 1970s.Feb. 3, 1964: New York City School Children Boycott School - Zinn Education ProjectChildren boycotted school for integration…and it helped…in a way, but nothing really has changed in the end.See my comment below as a footnote in how Joe Biden helped prevent busing on a federal level until it was no longer a fashionable solution in the 80s and 90s. This was a widespread position amongst all people. He’s far from the only one, and as much as he might have had the best intentions, it was bad policy, and in 40 years, he’s grown.Here’s a fascinating Podcast about the issues facing NYC schools: Nice White Parents. It’s a brilliant listen and dives deep into how NYC schools are still, currently, de facto segregated. A number of factors have lead to this segregation:Schools being funded by property taxes of the localities[1]Black and Brown people being kept out of free wealth enabling programs from half a century earlier preventing the creation of generational wealth[2] [3] [4]Policies preventing Black and Brown people from building wealth more recently like:Red Lining[5]White flight[6] combined with Suburban racist covenants[7]that explicitly make it so Black and Brown people cannot purchase property in the neighborhood.Subprime mortgages nearly being forced on them even if they could qualify for traditional mortgage packages[8] [9] [10]The above policies have created de facto segregated communities.Combine that with schools being locally funded by property taxes and you have poorly funded schools in poor neighborhoods while less than a mile away you have absolutely gorgeous, state of the art facilities.School choice[11]allows people in a place with a poor school to go to a different one that’s not in their locality. On its face it doesn’t seem like a bad idea, but it is primarily utilized by white families to go to primarily white schools.Uneven policing practices like broken window policing, increased conviction rates, higher sentencing, etc.[12] [13] [14][15]None of these issues are restricted to a particular region, a lot of it happened in the North — NYC and Massachusetts for example.To zone in on school choice, going into middle school there is a hard fight to get into the best public schools. Parents and students take tours, go to interviews, share portfolios, most minority families are kept out of the loop to the point when they don’t even know this political game exists…when they do, they’re too damn busy to try to leverage it.In recent interviews parents actually referred to the “good schools” as “white schools” and the key indicator people look for in a school was how white it was.A side note: Not all School Choice policies lead to segregation. That said, it shouldn’t be necessary.Neighborhoods fought hard in the 1970s to desegregate…but when it happened, the same parents moved their kids to a different school so that they weren’t disadvantaged by it.The school board, city, and state have taken a sort of…appeasement strategy for the parents, akin to how the slave owners were given reparations for their slaves being set free (no, the parents in cities are not nearly as bad on any level as slave-owners). They don’t want to tip any boats and every time there’s a proposal, a group of wealthy parents will quietly make it go away.Some have proposed Charter schools as a solution, they boast great test scores, but for the most part this is managed by a quiet culling of the student body, working within the parameters to make underachieving students be unwelcome and/or find a justification for expulsion.The effect on the minority and lower class children is palpable.Another episode of This American Life with the journalist who did Nice White Parents looks at programs that tantalize these kids who don’t have everything and how they’re harmed by it, and how it affects those kids that actually made it: 563: The Problem We All Live With - Part Two - This American LifeFor them, they are grown up being told by society that they don’t deserve anything. When they’re given something, good, finally, the message takes hold and becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. They shut down and drop out.The toll society — even in the most liberal of cities — has on the under privileged is monstrous.There’s a lot more to this story, as well. One of the after effects of Brown v. The Board of Education is that all the Black educators were fired and Black schools were closed. Studies have shown that, at least in this society, one of the best indicators of a Black student’s success is if they have a Black teacher or principal early in their education.Revisionist History Season 2 Episode 3So while the schools are effectively integrated, Black students were still discriminated against through paternalistic teachers, people talking down on them and constant reminders that they don’t belong.Segregated schools were never a good thing either, it reinforced these issues in a far more stark manner, through actual physical separation and lack of exposure. On top of that the black students weren’t able to even see what they were missing out on from actually having a budget for schools. Again, Listen to episode 563 of This American Life linked above. There are star students at the schools in an impoverished, minority neighborhood in brooklyn who went to the “white school” less than a mile away and were blown away, left feeling more angry than anything else at the quality difference.The minority schools couldn’t even offer AP courses or classes like Calculus, when students who were smart enough and driven enough to have taken them finally got the chance, they were left behind, and left believing the myth that they didn’t deserve it because of how they were born.I would recommend this book:The Sum of Us: What Racism Costs Everyone and How We Can Prosper Together: McGhee, Heather: 9780525509561: Amazon.com: BooksIf you don’t want to read the book, here’s a great interview she did with Ezra Klein: Opinion | What ‘Drained-Pool’ Politics Costs AmericaIt’s full of examples that demonstrate how racism has guided policy in America. Across the country American communities built fancy public pools, when it was required for public pools to be integrated racially, most communities simply shut down their pools, drained them or poured concrete in them. Some sold them for $1 to be run privately rather than have Black people swimming in the same pools.When Cities Closed Pools to Avoid Integration | JSTOR DailyEven when people haven’t actively thought about it, most of the policy coming out of the right is based in centuries of racism coming from the myth that Black people are less than and by segregating the population, it’s keeping society better off.The key theme, though, is these people made things worse for everyone — they destroyed shared resources rather than share them because of these misguided beliefs.At the same time, most of what the left wing has been able to accomplish has been half assed and still more beneficial to the establishment.My solution would be to make all school funding come from the state rather than locality and prohibit booster programs and program targeted donations. School fund raisers should go to the state school board for equal distribution based on areal needs like per capita budgeting.I would like to see the department of education actually do something, but I would fear that bad actors like in the 2016–2020 administration would actually hamstring public schools…this is the single advantage to the delegation hierarchy of the United States — the damage is limited. Currently the DoE provides guidance, grants, and is the largest loan administrator in the country.Side note again — Part of the student loan crisis issue we’re facing today is because of Drained Pool politics. States used to subsidize higher education to a much greater degree, but when they had to include all people in these benefits, they shifted to making it a wealth investment — just another way of holding those that had no wealth built up generationally down.To answer your question, though, they wouldn’t have desegregated. Places that weren’t required to, still aren’t for the most part…In many ways, Little Rock is better off than Brooklyn in this regard.Footnotes[1] Week 1: Why America's Schools Have A Money Problem [2] Land and the roots of African-American poverty – Keri Leigh Merritt | Aeon Ideas[3] June 21, 1866: Southern Homestead Act - Zinn Education Project[4] RACE - The Power of an Illusion . Background Readings[5] A 'Forgotten History' Of How The U.S. Government Segregated America[6] White Flight Lives on in American Cities[7] Seattle Civil Rights and Labor History Project[8] Staggering Loss of Black Wealth Due to Subprime Scandal Continues Unabated[9] The Social Structure of Mortgage Discrimination[10] Black Americans unfairly targeted by banks before housing crisis, says ACLU[11] New evidence on school choice and racially segregated schools[12] Interview: How Policing in One US City Hurts Black and Poor Communities[13] 10 things we know about race and policing in the U.S.[14] Harvard study finds institutional racism 'permeates' the Massachusetts justice system[15] Racial Profiling

Things change. Originally, a manse (which is the word mansion derives from) was the property meant to sustain the parish priest. Manor also derives from manse and indicates a lord’s holdings in the place he resides. The oldest mansions today began as fortified castles in the middle ages. In Britain and parts of Asia, a mansion block was a block of apartments designed to exude grandeur.After the fall of Rome, it gradually became less and less important to build fortifications, and more modern ideas about the mansion arose, focusing more upon beauty. Eventually the mansion was principally the building, which needn’t be attached to a large property. The BBC has run several programs showing how the family would live on the airiest, most comfortable floors, with servants inhabiting the ground and uppermost attics. You might be pressed right up against your neighbors and have no yard to speak of (such as in London) but the house can qualify as mansion on its own.As self-made men began to build their own “mansions” in the 19th century, they copied the aristocracy, although their magnificent homes tended to be smaller. Today there’s an emphasis on entertainment when building a mansion, with rooms devoted to such things as home theater or pool… even a bowling alley, perhaps.So what size? Depends where you are. In NYC, 6,000 sq. ft. would qualify, but there are plenty of places it wouldn’t. Basically, the yardstick is based upon the upper class and how much quality and space they can demand and pay for.As you can see, the square footage has steadily decreased over time. At the same time, beauty and function has grown more important. A fully automated house might fall into the same category as much larger dwellings; in this case the ease of living in the house is most important. But in any case, mansion indicates a level of consumption that’s above normal.But we ought not to leave the metaphorical aside. When is a home a castle? How big must it be to feel you’re living in a mansion? That’s kind of up to you. If you find your surroundings beautiful and life feels easy and sweet, if you feel like you have just what you want, I certainly won’t argue with your calling your home a mansion, even if it’s a tiny house. There’s no reason we can’t change the word to reflect our satisfaction rather than depend upon the Joneses to tell us whether we’ve “arrived.” Words change in meaning all the time.

I'll speak for San Francisco, but I assume roughy the same basics applies to the NYC boroughs at least. I have heard similar tales from Seattle. Vancouver had a unique issue that may apply to Toronto - that Chinese buyers were buying housing as speculation and then leaving it empty, “hollowing out” the city.House prices are being escalated by a limited supply of housing and a ready supply of buyers who see the property as a “can't miss” investment and have lots of capital and often cash certainly applies to San Francisco. This means the usual pressure that links house prices to a multiple of average wages does not apply.The supply of housing is limited by geography and by regulation. The demand in SF recently in particular is fuelled by the spread of startup culture up the peninsula as well as the growth of SV captive transport solutions (principally private buses) where being on the bus “counts” as being at work.Although most Bay Area residents have not made fortunes - enough have so that there are nearly always buyers with cash and cash equivalents to bid up house prices. The closer to the jobs the better as outside those buses the commute is a terrible, unpredictable, time suck.The cost of living is related to house prices because as they go up the labour pool for service jobs diminishes and moves further away and so the cost increases.I have noted before that roughly 10 years I used to live in a Street about 45 mins commute from Sam Francisco - and I called it the safest street in America because it had Federal agents, police captains, fire chiefs and so forth - all living just as close as they could afford to work and still have a family. Waiters and so forth either lived another 30 mins out or were without kids and so paid more for less space closer in. It was just about sustainable.Now in my area, a 2 bed apartment rents for 2500 a month. 1 bed over 1000. A house? Closer to 6k. And that is 45 mins to an hour away. In the city? 1 bed 1 bath 778 sq ft advertised for 2500… So all services that need people are having to pay more so the customers are paying more.