Oregon Nitrous Oxide Filling: Fill & Download for Free

Thanks for the A2A.I recently watched the series again for the second time.There were some innacuracies.The main things I noticed was:The documentary made it look as if Osho had broken his public silence after Sheela left the Ranch in September 1985, when he had been informed of the actual and planned crimes of Sheela and her entourage, when in reality he had been speaking again daily for some time, to small groups in his house since October 1984.The videos of the talks in his house were broadcast across the commune the next day for everyone to watch.Sheela was visibly distressed by Osho’s decision to start giving discourses again. According to Prem Sangeet, the then Rajneeshpuram City Attorney “Sheela cried for several days and begged Osho not to speak again”. In fact Osho originally wanted the videos to be played early in the morning before work, when the disciple’s mind and body was fresh, but Sheela argued huge back-logs in work that needed to be done for the city commune, and in the end videos of these talks were played after work – just as disciple’s were tired after a long day’s labour. It was not uncommon for half the audience to fall asleep.The talks Osho gave after his three years of public silence were fiery, provocative and often themed around challenging beliefs and authority, any authority, and trusting one`s own experience.On December 19th, 1984, for the first time Osho publicly criticised the organisation that Sheela had created around him. Up until that point, at least publicly, Osho had always seemed to support the organisation and Sheela unequivocally.Those few who were not part of Sheela’s circle who heard the discourse recall that Osho called for autonomous centres and communes again, and not ones merged with the Ranch organisation – as had increasingly happened since 1983. He also said that no-one could henceforth claim they were speaking on his behalf. (A common trick by Sheela and her group).He had ended that talk with the words, “ I will never leave you under a fascist regime”.At first Sheela ordered the videotape to be “lost” , and the so-called “Number 20 discourse” was consigned to the flames. The video was never played the next day to the rest of the commune.When the book editors recieved the transcript of the talk, it was clear that several passages from the discourse were missing. The last line of the discourse had been changed to “ I will never leave you in a state of chaos.”Osho giving discourse at RajneeshpuramJust a month later in January,1985 Osho sent Sheela back to India to look for a place for the new commune, together with Jayananda her husband and Krishna Deva and other members of her group. At a stroke, Osho was making it plain that the dream of a sannyas city state was not his, but Sheela’s. As he told Savita (Sheela’s number two) when the Ranch was collapsing six months later, “this experiment of yours is as nothing compared to my enlightenment and the enlightened contact with my sannyasins.” And Osho clearly fell about reconsolidating his real work and connection with his people without intermediary from October, 1984.In 1983, Osho had already spoken to Ma Yoga Laxmi, his previous secretary, and asked her to go back to India and search for a new commune site.Eventually , back to India in 1985, Laxmi had finally managed to find a place in Kullu Manali, by the time Osho had been deported from the U.S. Laxmi is not in America nowSheela had a dislike for India which she regarded as backwards, she had already spent time living on the U.S. when she was younger, and she wanted the new commune to be in America.She had discussed the idea with Osho but his ideal was to have the new commune in India, preferably somewhere in the Himalayas, according to Arup, who had worked with her, and Vivek , Osho’s close companion and her friend Veena, both of whom lived in Osho’s household.So Laxmi had been away looking around India for years, but had not managed to secure a place .Ma Prem Arup, who worked closely with both Sheela and Laxmi in Pune One, was present at Bombay Airport when Osho first left India for New York for possible back surgery for his prolapsed disc in June 1981.According to Arup, Osho had told Laxmi to keep negotiating for land for the new commune in Shimla , North India.Arup had stayed behind with Laxmi, but said that Laxmi had decided she wanted to follow him and turned up ten days later at the castle in New Jersey where Osho was staying , and later followed him to the Big Muddy Ranch in Oregon that Sheela had managed to purchase.When the sannyasins first arrived in Wasco County, Oregon, they were met with a real hostility and prejudice.The local ranchers were also hostile. From the moment the sannyasins arrived at the newly purchased Ranch, a Christian anti-cult organisation started distributing negative publicity about the newcomers, including untrue and inflammatory reports from the yellow press in India. A county road ran through the centre of the Ranch, and some locals took to driving down it brandishing rifles and shooting into the road signs. Their trucks carry bumper stickers showing Osho’s face in the cross-hairs of a rifle, and slogans like ‘Better Dead Than Red’ (the sannyasins all wore shades of red clothing). Anti-Rajneeshpuram meetings were held in nearby towns, and the atmosphere became very tense. So the sannyasins decided they needed weapons to try to deter any violent attacks , they also formed an official city ‘Peace Force’, and its officers were trained and armed with weapons.Osho and Sheela had also recieved death threats, bizzare letters and threats of violent invasion from several odd groups including the American Nazi Party, the Ku Klux Klan, and others.The U.S. administration under Reagan were concerned with the speed at which the sannyasins were constructing the city , and the amount of money they had to poor into it.They successfully transformed a barren desert land, with low grade, overgrazed soil into an oasis , a fully self sustainable agricultural commune , and a city with its own infrastructure and room for thousands of people.And no less than seventeen Government agencies were working together to try to destroy the commune.So Osho had realised pretty early on that it was a mistake to have come to America and wanted to start searching for a new site in India again.Sheela had her own group of people around her in her home, the Jesus Grove complex. However, Sheela had a real problem with the residents of Osho`s home, Lao Tzu House, and felt threatened by anyone that had a lot of physical contact and time with him.That included Osho`s caretaker, Nirvano (Vivek) , his doctor Amrito (Devaraj), and the other members of Osho`s house.When the “Hollywood Gang” arrived at the Ranch, sometime around 1984 , including Prem Hasya and Dhyan John, they had a lot of contact with Osho and Sheela was very upset and felt threatened by Hasya`s personal contact with Osho.That is well documented in the series.However, I could see that Sheela makes a false claim when she tries to accuse Hasya , Amrito and others of keeping Osho drugged on nitrous Oxide and valium.Osho had already been having daily sessions of nitrous oxide as early as 1982, when he dictated the three books while in the Dental chair.Osho was introduced to nitrous oxide as an anaesthetic and analgesic in a dental session by his dentist Devageet. Nitrous oxide was commonly used in dentistry in those days . Osho liked it ,and remarked that it cooled his chest, and as Devageet had taken some notes , Osho had decided to create a book of the notes, complete with some photo`s, that Devageet had taken whilst speaking in his dental chair.Osho`s dentist Devageet has said that there were periods of several months after the initial sessions , so these were not constant throughout the time at the Ranch. There ended up being three books which were eventually released in 1985. Sheela also added a completely fictional chapter in the first publication of the book ‘Glimpses of a Golden Childhood’ , which contained a false story that Osho had been adopted by her father.But the point is that Osho was very much the boss , and although he would often ask for Devageet`s or Devaraj`s professional opinions on dental or medical matters, ultimately , they were the surrendered disciples and he was the Master .Vivek was incredibly devoted to Osho, and as his caretaker and the closest disciple to him, she tried her hardest to protect his general and physical wellbeing.And Sheela herself, is well documented by others in her inner circle to have been using large amounts of drugs , uppers and downers, to cope with the massive workload and the stress of her work.It seems that the stress of the whole thing, combined with the enormous power that she had, had affected her mental health after around 1982.Sheela had huge charisma and was very, very clever and knew how to manipulate people. This is power chakra stuff. However, power can be dangerous without an open heart.She was not all interested in meditation , as she herself admits, she was interested in organising, and Osho would have recognised her managerial qaulities and effeciency in getting things done.However, I believe that Osho made a big mistake by encouraging Sheela to be so provocative in her public appearances and dealings with the locals.In the end her ego trip , lack of empathy, and lapse into madness,to the point of psychopathy , led her to do some very bad things which she still can not take accountability for.This is another thing that isn`t made clear in the series-Shanti Bhadra, one of Sheela’s gang`, talks about the attempted murder of Osho`s doctor , Amrito, how she injected him in the meditation hall with a syringe loaded with adrenaline. Amrito was lucky to have survived.But wasn`t made clear is that they had already tried to get rid of Amrito a year before, and had been systematically poisoning his lunch everyday for twelve months with an unidentified substance.For months Amrito has started feeling nauseous several hours after lunchtime, and people noticed that he looked slightly greyish, but it never became clear what the mystery digestive illness was .“I participated in poisoning Devaraj numerous times, who was Osho’s physician. I participated in poisoning attempts on Vivek, who was Osho’s assistant, a number of times. I participated in poisoning Judge Hull. I participated in salmonella poisoning of the Dalles.”(From Ava`s testimony to the FBI)But the doctor wasn`t the only one- Sheela had started experimenting with different poisons and bacterial agents , and poisoning the drinks and food of both sannyasins who had irritated her in some way , as well as visiting Oregon state government officials who left the commune complaining of a belly aches .For one of them , Mike Sullivan, his symptoms were much more severe, he nearly died after becoming seriously ill after taking food that had been sent from Sheela`s people.“Mike Sullivan, Jefferson County district attorney, had been working to negotiate a settlement between local citizens and us. On February 16th, 1983, he became ill. At first just drowsy and lethargic, later he began to suffer vomiting and diarrhea, which became so intense that he had to be admitted to St. Charles Hospital, Bend (where Devaraj was to be hospitalized two years later). He was told he had only “one percent chance of surviving,” and was tentatively diagnosed as having pneumococcus pneumonia. Apparently Sullivan had been sent food from Sheela’s people; in addition, it would not have been difficult for a substance to be put in his coffee as he had a habit of leaving his coffee cup around his office.”“It was a fact of life that those who openly opposed Sheela, even questioned her or proposed an idea different to hers, suffered for it. At the very least they could expect a telling off; they might get away with a mild dose of poison in their tea at Jesus Grove, but the main punishment was being told to leave Rajneeshpuram. And that wasn’t just a threat; people did leave under Sheela’s orders.”(From “Osho The Buddha for the Future” by Maneesha James)Swami Devakant , a musician and carpenter who lived and worked close to Osho at both Rajneeshpuram and Poona Two recalls in his recent book ‘ In the Eye of the Hurricane’:“Something had happened in the afternoon hours before the ‘Celebration’: the meal that was prepared for us to be taken home after the evening event, like a take- out dinner, had a fruit salad in it, in its own box. Just before the darshan, suddenly it was ordered that all the fruit salads had to be taken back to the cafeteria and gotten rid of it, all 5,000 of them. Rumours sprang up that the ones that were destined for Lao Tzu House had been poisoned, but the idiots of Sheela’s gang who ran the kitchen got them mixed up with others, and now nobody knew what was what. That was typical; diabolical intentions and a lot of stupidity mixed together, that was the hallmark of the fascist gang.At the end of the darshan, something weird was happening up in the front, a crowd gathered; word came later that DevaRaj had a heart attack or something, nobody really knew what was going on in the ensuing chaos, but he was on the floor and a gathering of the ‘gang’ were around him, amd energetically it was clear that a maximum low point had been reached in the life of the commune, that those precious moments when we could actually sit in the presence of Osho had been turned into a massive energetic disaster” . ( “In The Eye Of The Hurricane- The Inside Story Of A Disciples Journey” , Devakant p203–204 : ‘In the Eye of the Hurricane’ )Sheela had asked for one of her group to research for her slow poisons, that would not leave a trace, and fast acting poisons. Puja, one of Sheela`s group , had been trying to cultivating several strains of bacteria, and the HIV virus, in a secret lab in a remote location on the Ranch.“When she later heard about the massive outbreak of salmonella poisoning in The Dalles, Jagruti asked Puja what had happened, to which Puja replied that she, Puja, had placed salmonella bacteria in the salad bars, disguising herself with a wig for the occasion. According to Jagruti, Puja seemed very pleased with herself and boasted of her “success.” In addition, Dr. Indivar remembers that in the spring of 1984 Puja asked him what kind of poison could be given to a person to make them sick but not kill them, and what type of poison could be administered but not detected by doctors on routine medical examination.” ( From “Osho Buddha for the Future”)Sheela never got on with Nirvano ( Vivek) , Osho`s closest companion and caretaker.Sheela felt immensely threatened by Vivek, and this also made Vivek a target of Sheela.“Samya recalls a discussion attended by Sheela, Puja, Shanti Bhadra, Su, and Krishna Deva, the focus of which is: How to poison Vivek? Samya remembers that someone says it will be more difficult to poison Vivek as she never eats or drinks outside Lao Tzu House. Another of the group suggests putting something into the water system of Osho’s house, but this idea is rejected: everyone in the house might then fall sick, and that will look suspicious. Subsequently, as recounted by Patipada, who is guarding in the compound of Lao Tzu House on the night of this same day, an attempt is made to murder Vivek by injection; when this fails, a week later, when Vivek happens to visit Jesus Grove, she is poisoned. She develops an acute attack of paroxysmal atrial tachycardia, which subsides only after some hours.”(Osho: Buddha for the Future) .After Sheela had left the Ranch in september 1985, people began to fill Osho in on the crimes, and activities, this included members of her group who had remained loyal to Osho.This is when Osho decided to expose the crimes and activites publicly, and invited the FBI and law enforcement agencies in to the commune to investigate.This part is covered in the Netflix series.Sheela and Puja later pleaded guilty to the salmonella attack in the Dalles, and the attempted murder of Osho`s doctor.But it seems suspicous to me, that they spent such a short period in prison ,and were released so early.Sheela had been sentenced to three 20- year terms in federal prison , to be served concurrently , for attemping to murder Devaraj ,Commisioner Matthew and Judge Hulse , the Salmonella poisoning’s and arson. In addition she was fined $470,000.Puja had been sentenced to 15 years for attempted murder and assaulting the county officials.However, they were released after serving only 29 months of their sentence.And Sheela appears relaxed and happy when she was arrested.Sheela and Puja arrested in Germany 1985The crimes planned and actual were pretty horrific and have been exposed fully in the book Osho: Buddha for the Future, that Osho originally asked Maneesha James to write as a historical record of the Rajneespuram period, and had originally been published in 1988 under the title ‘ ‘Bhagwan: Buddha for the Future‘ .Maneesha has spoken with with previous members of Sheela`s close inner circle , and researched the whole thing quite extensively.Her book is well worth a read for anyone interested in the history of Rajneeshpuram or sannyas:Osho: The Buddha For the Future - OSHO SammasatiDevakant , a musician and carpenter lived through Poona One, Rajneeshpuram and the Poona Two commune , and worked in Osho’s household . His recent book is another account well worth a read: ‘In the Eye of the Hurricane’See also Anand Sharma's answer to Why did Osho plan a bioterror attack in Oregon?In late October 1985, just over a month after the sudden departure of Sheela and her group, the National Guard was getting into position to invade the commune.Osho had publicly exposed the crimes and invited the authorities to investigate.However,these authorities finally saw their opportunity to destroy the commune entirely and force Osho out.Their very expensive four-year long investigation against Osho had revealed nothing. But they now saw the possibility to put pressure on some of the people Osho had exposed, hoping to turn them against him. They persuaded Sheela to hand over to them all the tapes made when she secretly bugged Osho’s room.But nothing came of this , and later, both US Attorney Turner and Attorney General Frohnmeyer publicly acknowledged that ‘they had little evidence of [Osho] being involved in any of the criminal activities that unfolded at the ranch’.Swami Prem Niren, Rajneesh’s attorney, put it like this, “Sheela bugged Osho’s room including her conversations with him, for months. She took some tapes with her when she left. Thousands of tapes were later discovered by sannyasins and voluntarily turned over to the FBI.“Sheela and the government had strong motivation to prove Osho’s involvement in her crimes. But they never produced a speck of evidence to indicate, let alone substantiate, anything of the sort. This failure to offer evidence, where there is strong motive and opportunity, is proof of the absence of evidence.”” (A Passage To America )So the authorities eventually settled for a sealed indictment accusing Osho of conspiring to commit immigration fraud by encouraging his sannyasins to marry illegally to obtain green cards.The Government had been spending a vast amount of money involving multiple agencies to destroy the commune and the INS had been conducting an investigation for around four up years , trying to find ways to deport Osho and several other sannyasins.The Attorney General for Oregon Charles Turner later said in 1986, that “Our first priority was to deport Osho and dissolve the commune, and the authorities knew that the removal of [Osho] would precipitate this.”“Charles Turner, the US government’s prosecuting attorney in the case against Bhagwan – who happened to be a fundamentalist Christian – stated in February 1989, that as Rajneeshpuram was becoming established, the government “threw up their hands, [saying]: ‘What are we going to do with these people? How are we going to get them out of here? They’re totally entrenched. They’re a political entity. They have money, they have power, they have organization. They’re sophisticated, they have people who are absolutely, completely, totally committed to what they are doing, zealous beyond anything that I’ve never encountered before in my life. So, what are we going to do about it? Let’s use the US attorney’s office to charge them with immigration fraud.'”…Charles Turner continued: “I realized early on that the thing to do, if we wanted to get rid of these people… was to deport the Rajneesh, because he was the catalyst and the lynchpin for this organization. If we could get rid of him, the whole thing would fall apart as a matter of course.”” ( ‘Bhagwan : Twelve Days That Shook The World’ , Juliet Forman , 2002)From time to time over the last year, rumours would reach Osho’s attorneys that the INS had prepared indictments and were about to arrest Osho for immiegration violations and invade the Ranch.There was a meeting in July with Osho’s immiegration attorney and the Attorney General of Oregon Charles Turner. Both sides expressed great concern at the potential for violence if federal officials attempted to invade the Ranch to arrest Osho.Turner confirmed the existence of an investigation but would not confirm an imminent indictment or arrest. However Osho’s attorneys reached an agreement with Turner , that if an arrest warrant were issued against Osho, they would be contacted by Turner’s office and given an opportunity to meet with him to discuss voluntary surrender. Turner assured that Osho would be given a chance to represent himself in the event an agreement could not be reached, and the matter could be taken before a United States magistrate before Osho would be taken into custody.By October , the National Guard had surrounded the commune and there were rumours that they were about to invade with the INS , who had prepared a sealed indictment accusing Osho of immiegration violations . The atmosphere inside the commune was tense. There were fears of a bloodbath. Osho’s attorneys again made several attempts to negotiate a voluntary surrender with the authorities , who again refused to confirm that any indictment had been issued.With that in mind a small group of Osho’s disciples decided to get him away from the commune as a preventative measure and to depressurize the situation (the biggest fear being that some disciples might come to harm if they got involved in a firefight whilst trying to protect Osho and defend themselves from an armed invasion from the National Guard).Osho’s new secretary Ma Prem Hasya , Hasya (Françoise Ruddy) , who said that since the US Attorney had denied the existence of an indictment or an imminent arrest, she had suggested that Osho go away for a few days to depressurise the situation , – as the threat of an invasion of the Ranch by the INS and the Oregon National Guard, included a high probability that there would be violence directed at Osho’s disciples.Osho had agreed to the suggestion, and he and eight sannyasins had flown out of the Ranch at 5:30 pm. The pilots of the rented jets had filed flight plans with the FAA, giving Charlotte, North Carolina, as their destination. There was no apparent effort made to conceal his departure. As it happened, undercover federal officers were at Rajneeshpuram and had observed the jets taking off.From information obtained from the freedom of information act, sannyasins now know that the National Guard had already mounted the machine guns onto their helicopters and were about to assault the commune with over 300 armed officers and helicopter gunships.They flew him in a small jet across the country to Charlotte, North Carolina, where he was arrested at gunpoint by heavily armed federal agents.( Initially the US government tried to charge Osho with flight to avoid prosecution,but this was later dropped).“He masterfully managed the end of the Ranch in such a way that none of us were killed. That was a miracle, in every sense of the word. Just look at what happened to the Branch Dravidians in Waco, or the MOVE Family in Philadelphia, a couple of years later, will undermine that fact. An alternative religious community in Waco, Texas, was burned to the ground by the FBI as live news carried the feed, and more than 70 people died. In Philadelphia, the MOVE Family was cordoned off by the police and firebombed , destroying several city blocks: more bodies , many of them children. Both of these were situations where a small alternative community with different religious views than the mainstream presented itself as unwilling to be trampled under the threat of violent lethal force that the state holds as its trump card, always. Thumb your nose at that, and you will be crushed, in America. And if there is a body count, it’s just ‘collateral damage’. We escaped that fate, by a masterful playing of the cards in Osho’s hands. When he left on the plane to be arrested that night , it was drawing the heat away from the commune, and letting himself be taken , instead of having a shoot - out at the Ranch which would have been just another of Ronald Reagan’s bloodbaths.” ( ‘In the Eye of the Hurricane - The Inside Journey of a Disciples Journey’, Devakant , p482) .Hanya, an American sannyasin who had a house in Charlotte where Osho and his group were going to stay , was standing waiting for the plane on the tarmac.“Nirupa saw Hanya. Hanya, with whom we were going to stay in Charlotte, was Nirupa's extremely young mother-in-law.” “Nirupa called out excitedly to Hanya, and almost simultaneously from many directions loud shouts of "Hands up" threw me into another reality. I was in that terrible gap for a moment, from where the mind surfaces to say, "No, this can't be real." Within a couple of seconds the plane was surrounded by about fifteen men pointing their guns at us.”(From Diamond Days with Osho by Shunyo)Read a first hand account of the arrest in North Carolina and time in jail here by Prem Shunyo , who was with Osho at the time:Chapter Eight“The men were shouting for us to get out of the plane with our hands up, but although the pilots opened the door we could not get out because Osho's armchair was a third the size of the jet, and stood in the doorway. We tried to call to our captors that we couldn't get out and they must have thought it some kind of ploy while we were maybe loading our machine guns. They got very agitated and a light was shone into my face through the window. I turned and twelve inches from my face was the barrel of a gun, and at the end of the gun was a very tense and frightened face. I realized that he was more frightened than me, and that was dangerous.”(From Diamond Days with Osho by Shunyo)In Charlotte, North Carolina Osho was arrested without any warrant, and after spending around four days in Mecklenberg County Jail, he was separated from his disciples,told that he was being taken back to Portland, Oregon, a journey that usually took just four to six days by plane.However, Osho was dragged through six jails in twelve days.This is mentioned in the documentary, however there is no mention of the suspicous circumstances of Osho`s incarceration .In one of the jails, Oklahoma County Jail, Osho was told to register under a pseudonym, David Washington .When he refused to do this, the Marshall wrote the name David Washington, and told Osho to sign it. Osho then signed the form with his usual Hindi signature.Sannyas lawyers have obtained copies of that form from 1985 and confirmed that Osho`s story about this is true. (See the soon to be updated book, "Bhagwan: Twelve Days that shook the World" by (Maneesha James )https://oshosammasati.org/facili...Jail forms from Oklahoma County Jail,dated 11.5.85, with Osho`s name signed as “David Washington”.A U.S. Marshall took Osho to his cell and told him to take a dirty mattress. Osho had asked for a blanket and a pillow, however this was refused, despite being a cold November night.According to Osho`s account:“Strangely enough, in the early morning at five o'clock he opened the door and he was a completely changed man. I could not believe my eyes, because he had brought a new mattress, a blanket, a pillow. I said, "But in the night you were behaving in such a primitive way. Suddenly you have become so civilized."And he offered me breakfast early in the morning—five o'clock. In no other jail I was offered breakfast before nine o'clock. I said, "It is too early—and why are you paying so much attention?"But he said, "You have to eat it quick, because within five minutes we have to leave for the airport."I said, "Then what is the purpose of the mattress and the blanket and the pillow?"He said nothing and simply closed the door. The breakfast was not much: just two slices of bread soaked in a certain sauce—I could not figure out what it was—tasteless, odorless.”It has since been established that the day after Osho left Oklahoma City, the Deputy Marshall mentioned , who signed Osho into the jail under the false name, and gave him the dirty mattress to sleep on, in Oklahoma County Jail, didn’t normally work at the jail and had left the Marshal Service to work for INS somewhere down the Texas -Mexican border.Osho began to have health problems during his World Tour(1986) , in which he was refused entry or deported from many countries, due to pressure from the U.S Government.Anand Sharma's answer to Why did 21 countries refuse entry to Osho Rajneesh?This included some unexplained hairloss, nausea, fatigue, and from time to time a strange tingling appeared all over his body.In one account from Osho`s stay in Ireland, his doctor had to help him to walk through the corridor of the hotel, as Osho was so fatigued.But at the time , these symptoms were put down to the stress of being in the American Jails.It was almost two years later, at the end of 1987 , back in Pune, when the symptoms had become much worse , that Osho publicly declared that he believed that he believed that he had been poisoned , possibly while incarcerated in the U.S.Irradiation was a possibilty. Osho had severe pain concentrated mainly on the right side of his body, this is the main side that he slept on.For radiation to be administrated effectively, the subject has to be kept very cold. This would explain the blanket being refused on the cold November night in the Oklahoma Jail.Specimens of Osho`s hair, blood and nails were sent to medical experts in London.Their diagnosis suggested that Osho had been poisoned by a heavy metal, thallium seemed likely , but flourocarbon was another possibility.Irradiation was another.See the podcast featuring a discussion with the bodyworker who treated Osho`s body over many sessions in Pune 2 : Episode 33 - Osho's touch-based doctor“Was Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh poisoned by Ronald Reagan`s America?” by Sue Appleton Was Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh Poisoned By Ronald Reagan's America?: Sue Appleton: 9783893380411: Amazon.com: Booksis a book also looking into the evidence and poisoning theories, this book also looks at the facts that members of Sheela`s group were experimenting with slow and fast acting poisons at the Ranch.The book was written in 1988 by Anando, Osho`s secretary in the last year of his life.The Attorney for Oregon later said in 1986, that “Our first priority was to deport Osho and dissolve the commune, and the authorities knew that the removal of [Osho] would precipitate this.”Swami Prem Niren, (Philip Toelkes) , Osho`s attorney at Rajneeshpuram, tries to explain what Osho was really about in the documentary , and the energetic connection with his master. He also has the full knowledge of the legal cases, but has said that the producers left out some of his contributions in the series:“ Certainly not the story I would have told. They de-emphasized Sheela’s fascist criminality, didn’t use all the material supported by facts that I gave them where the government admitted that it had no evidence that Osho was involved in any of Sheela’s crimes. US Attorney Charles Turner admitting, “We were using the criminal process to solve what was really a political problem.”The real issue was stated in Governor Atiyah’s public admittance that he “wishes the Rajneesh followers would leave Oregon.”“ And in the end, after the Community was destroyed, the Oregon Supreme Court found that the City did not violate land use laws,” the basic contention of those who opposed the creation of a city from day one. This then led to the residents of Rajneeshpuram becoming involved in the city of Antelope in the first place, the basic cause of the confrontations that followed! “Niren is currently writing a book about the Rajneeshpuram experiment , which will include the truth of the legal cases, which is apparently due to be released soon.Interview with Niren:Podcast from Mutribu, the camerman who filmed a lot of the footage used in WWC : Episode 27 - Osho from behind the cameraOsho’s World Ambassador , Shantam Lani speaks on Wild Wild Country:Reflecting on Rajneeshpuram Commune LifeHere`s OIF`s take on WWC: Wild Wild Country: The Story behind the StoryAnd lastly, I would like to leave you with this humorous take on WWC:

Let’s assume for the sake of argument that the 5 year temp. data is accurate which it is not because of fudged data for the much warmer dirty thirties.This short 5 year weather data is irrelevant noise and of no value in knowing what is happening to the climate. No trend is possible over 5 years and even 100 years is too short.We can illustrate the time scale effect by looking at the data over the following years - 20, 100, 1000 and 7000 60 m. Only the long many centuries shows a recognizable trends WEATHER DATA ONLY MATTERS FOR TRENDS WITH MORE THAN CENTURIES OTHERWISE IT IS SIMPLY UNRELIABLE NOISE.Indeed no doubt the recent claim of global warming revised to climate change as temperatures plunged erred because the scientists were fooled by the randomness of climate history.Further, global temperatures are in a long term decline and 5 years is an irrelevant blip where time is measured in centuries not even decades. We are in an ice age and it would be wonderful if it the temperature was rising but it is not. There are oscillation that do not change the trend line.THE LONGER THE TIME SCALE THE MORE ACCURATE ARE TEMPERATURE TRENDS. SEE 60 MILLION YEARS -Tthe 5 year claim is false because it depends on tampered data. Historical temp data edited to make the past cooler and present warmer. The drought ridden temperatures during the dirty thirties were revised downward REALITY WAS ADJUSTED OUT OF EXISTENCE BY NASA.You can fudge data but you cannot remove reality burned into historic photos and famous literature of the thirties drought from excessive heat.Gwyn Morgan: ​If CO2 is to blame, how do you explain the Dirty Thirties?During the Great Depression, CO2 levels were 25 per cent lower than today’s but severe climate change led to the Dirty ThirtiesBy Gwyn Morgan |June 2, 2016, 7:14 a.m. |Image: Canadian EncyclopediaThe collapse of global commodity prices was sudden and severe. Workers coming off a decade of unprecedented prosperity suddenly found themselves jobless and unable to provide for their beleaguered families.For a time, they maintained hope that the downturn would be temporary, but as the first year stretched into the second, many lost hope. Some who had come from provinces of high unemployment to participate in the Alberta boom began their glum journey back. Laidoff workers saw a glimmer of hope when commodity prices appeared to bottom out. At the very least, it seemed, things wouldn’t get worse.Then nature unleashed a crushing conflagration. Searing winds swept across drought-stricken farms and forests. A young boy comes running breathlessly into the house shouting to his mom, “There’s a big black cloud in the sky.” They hurry outside to behold a terrifying sight in the western sky that would force the family out of their home and into an uncertain future.This is not, as it may seem, the story of the global oil price collapse combined with the Fort McMurray wildfire. The commodity price collapse in this story was caused by the economic earthquake of 1929 that launched the Great Depression. And the conflagration was the extremely hot and dry weather that turned the fertile prairie “breadbasket” into a drought-stricken wasteland. That black cloud was caused by hundreds of millions of tonnes of topsoil being blown away by the wind.Impoverished farmers, hoping for an early end to the drought, were encouraged by a couple of years of improved weather. But it was only a temporary respite. The summers of 1936 and 1937 brought an abrupt reversal that proved even hotter, drier and windier. Tens of thousands of farms were abandoned in what is remembered as the Dirty Thirties, displacing 250,000 people whose only skill set was farming.Inexplicably, the devastatingly hot conditions reversed in 1940, with the arrival of a cooling period that would last until 1975.Since the Fort McMurray disaster, some have blamed the very product the people work to produce as the cause of the hot, dry weather that nurtured the wildfires. But analysis of temperature data over the past century shows some startling facts. First, the 1930s were by far the hottest period. Of the 10 highest temperature days ever recorded in Canada, seven occurred in the 1930s. And none of those top 10 temperature records were set during the past decade. Yet the atmospheric concentration of CO2 in the 1930s was some 25 per cent lower than today’s levels.While theories abound, scientists have not been able to explain why, during a period of such low CO2 levels, such an abrupt shift from a long period of moderate temperatures and ample rainfall to devastatingly hot and dry conditions could occur. Likewise, scientists struggle to explain the equally sudden shift in 1940 that saw a 35-year-long cooling period even as greenhouse gas emissions rapidly increased.But whatever the answer to that question, one thing is crystal clear: Tying any single extreme weather event to atmospheric CO2 concentrations simply isn’t historically or scientifically credible.The Fort McMurray fires took about one million barrels per day out of production. But did that reduce global consumption of fossil fuels? Of course not. Countries including Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Angola and Ivory Coast quickly filled the void.Not only do these countries have appalling human rights records but, as we have become painfully aware, some of the proceeds from their sales are funnelled to extremist groups who shatter the lives of people throughout the Middle East and North African region and foment terror across the west.Those who celebrated the Fort McMurray disaster as divine environmental justice need to know this: Shutting down the Canadian oilsands altogether would reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by a minuscule one-10th of a per cent, only to be replaced by oil from countries whose environmental and human rights records are vastly inferior to Canada’s.My vote goes to the made-in-Canada oil produced by those resilient, hard-working Canadians who have been forced to endure job loses, destructive wildfires and environmental extremist schadenfreude as they proudly anchor a crucial economic cornerstone of our country.I’ll take the values contained in their made-in-Canada oil over that Middle Eastern and North African stuff any day.© 2016 Distributed by Troy MediaGwyn Morgan: ​If CO2 is to blame, how do you explain the Dirty Thirties? | Carbon & Sustainability | JWN EnergyTHE SUN IS INACTIVE AND EARTH IS COOLING.This claim of 5 years warmest is impossible and or irrelevant because it is just a short bump. The claim is bunk and the authors are fooled by randomness.Paul Carfoot@PaulCarfoot·Climate alarmists are so arrogant they think natural climate variations stopped around 150 years ago? The climate is always warming and cooling, always has always will. Recent modern warming, not outside the realms of natural variability. #ClimateChange #AGW pic.twitter.com/HpGuhSnTSY— Paul Carfoot (@PaulCarfoot) September 30, 2019Climate alarmists are so arrogant they think natural climate variations stopped around 150 years ago? The climate is always warming and cooling, always has always will. Recent modern warming, not outside the realms of natural variability. #ClimateChange #AGWThe History Of NASA/NOAA Temperature CorruptionPosted on January 14, 2016 by tonyhellerChallenge_chapter2.pdfThis pattern of NASA making the past cooler and the present warmer has occurred repeatedly since NASA became chartered with proving global warming. The past keeps getting colder.In 1974, The National Center For Atmospheric Research (NCAR) generated this graph of global temperatures, showing a large spike in the 1940’s, rapid cooling to 1970 and net cooling from 1900 to 1970.denisdutton.com/newsweek_coolingworld.pdfIn 1975, the National Academy of Sciences published a very similar graph for Northern hemisphere temperatures, which also showed net cooling from 1900 to 1970.Page 148 : understandingcli00unit.pdfBy 1981, the graph had started to tilt to the left. Temperatures in 1970 were now about 0.1C warmer than 1900.Not surprisingly, this change coincided with James Hansen’s interest in demonstrating a CO2 driven warming trend.Challenge_chapter2.pdfThis pattern of NASA making the past cooler and the present warmer has occurred repeatedly since NASA became chartered with proving global warming. The past keeps getting colder.1981: Challenge_chapter2.pdf2001: Fig.A.pscurrent: Fig.A.gifThe next graph shows how 1880-2000 global warming has been doubled since 2001, simply by altering the data. This graph is normalized to the most recent common years of the 1990’s.The NASA temperature data is based on NOAA GHCN (Global Historical Climatology Network) data. The map below shows where their stations are located, with gray representing no data. They are missing data for about half of the Earth’s surface including most of Africa, Antarctica and Greenland. The only places with complete coverage are the US and Western Europe. The gray areas are filled in with computer modeled temperatures, meaning that about 50% of the global data used by NASA and NOAA is fake.The Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time -- Part XXFebruary 19, 2019/ Francis MentonSince last October, this series has been sitting at the rather awkward number of 19 (or “XIX”) posts.Time to round it off at an even XX.For those new to this topic, the Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time is the systematic downward adjustment of early-year temperatures in order to create a fake enhanced warming trend, the better to bamboozle voters and politicians to go along with extreme measures to try to avert the impending “climate crisis.” Prior posts in this series have documented large and unexplained downward adjustments at hundreds of stations around the world that are used by official government organizations (in the US, primarily NOAA and NASA) to wipe out early-year high temperatures and thereby proclaim that the latest month or year is “the hottest ever!” To read all prior posts in this series, go to this link.You might ask, with the extensive exposure of these unsupportable downward adjustments of early-year temperatures by official government organizations — accompanied by highly credible accusations of scientific fraud — haven’t the adjusters been cowed by now into a smidgeon of honesty? It sure doesn’t look that way.The latest news comes out of Australia, via the website of Joanne Nova. Nova’s February 17 post is titled “History keeps getting colder — ACORN2 raises Australia’s warming rate by over 20%.” “ACORN2” is a newly revised and updated temperature series for Australia, with temperatures going back to 1910 based on records from 112 weather stations on the continent, some 57 of which have records that go back all the way to the 1910 start date. “ACORN” stands for Australian Climate Observations Reference Network. The ACORN2 data compilation is so called to distinguish it from ACORN1, which was only released some 7 years ago in 2012.The people who put out these things are the Australian Bureau of Meteorology.According to Nova, the latest temperature adjustments were released “oh-so-quietly.” I guess that the plan is just to start using the new figures as the historical comparisons and bet that journalists will be too stupid or ignorant to figure out that the earlier temperatures have been altered. That’s actually a pretty good bet. However, down in Australia they do have a hard-working group of independent researchers who are on top of this issue. One of them is Nova, and another is Chris Gillham. Gillham has done his own very detailed analysis of the adjustments in the ACORN2 report, and has also put up a post on same at Watts Up With That.So there is plenty of information out there for intelligent people to make an independent judgment.A few excerpts from Nova:Once again we find that the oldest thermometers were apparently reading artificially high, even though many were newish in 1910 and placed in approved Stevenson screens. This is also despite the additional urban warming effect of a population that grew 400% since then. What are the odds?! Fortunately . . ., sorry scientists have uncovered the true readings from the old biased thermometers which they explain carefully in a 67 page impenetrable document. . . . The new ACORN version has nearly doubled the rate of warming in the minima of the longest running stations.Nova has put together several charts to show the magnitude of the adjustments, not only from ACORN1 to ACORN2, but also from the prior AWAP compilation to ACORN1. To no one’s surprise, each round of adjustments makes the earlier years cooler, and thus enhances the apparent warming trend. Here is Nova’s chart showing the amount of warming from the beginning to the end of the series, for each of AWAP, ACORN1 and ACORN2, and for minimum, mean and maximum temperatures:For example, the average minimum temperature had increased over the century covered by 0.84 deg C in the AWAP series. That increased to 1.02 deg C in the ACORN1 series, and to 1.22 deg C in the ACORN2 series.You need to go over to Gillham’s work to see how these changes derive mostly from decreases in early-year temperatures. Here is a chart from Gillham on the changes to minimum temperatures at the 57 stations that go back all the way to the 1910 start:As you can see, the “raw” and “v1” temperatures tend to be close — sometimes one higher, sometimes the other. But v2 is significantly lower across the board in the earlier years. Then, suddenly, in the recent years, it tracks the “raw” almost http://perfectly.Do they offer a justification for these downward adjustments? Yes, but nothing remotely satisfactory. The one-word explanation is “homogenization.” OK, we understand what that is. For example, sometimes a station moves, and that causes a discontinuity, where, say, the new location is systematically 0.1 deg C lower than the old. An adjustment needs to be made. But these sorts of adjustments should cancel out. How is it possible that every time some official meteorological organization anywhere in the world makes some of these “homogenization” adjustments, the result is that earlier years get colder and the supposed “global warming” trend gets enhanced — always to support a narrative of “climate crisis.”Well, fortunately, this time the Australian Bureau of Meteorology has put out a very long 57-page document explaining what they have done. Here it is. Is it any help?As far as I am concerned, this is the definitive proof of the fraud. If this were even an attempt at real, credible science, the proponents would put out a document complete with the details of the adjustments — and all of their computer code — so that an independent researcher could replicate the work. Nothing like that is here. This is pure bafflegab. Nova calls it “impenetrable,” which is way too nice a word as far as I’m concerned. Let me give you a small taste:3. HOMOGENISATION METHODS3.1 Detection of inhomogeneities - use of multiple detection methods in parallelIn version 1 of ACORN-SAT, a single statistical method for detection of inhomogeneities was used (Trewin, 2012). This method was based closely on the Pairwise Homogenisation Algorithm (PHA) developed by Menne and Williams (2009), and involves pairwise comparison of data between the candidate station and all sufficiently well-correlated stations in the region, with the Standard Normal Homogeneity Test (SNHT) (Alexandersson, 1986) used to identify significant breakpoints in the difference series. The test was carried out separately on monthly mean anomalies (as a single time series with 12 data points per year), and seasonal mean anomalies, with a breakpoint flagged for further assessment if it was identified in either the monthly series, or (within a window of ± 1 year) in at least two of the four seasons. Further details of the implementation of the PHA in the ACORN-SAT dataset are available in Trewin (2012).A range of other detection methods have been developed in recent years, many of which were the subject of the COST-HOME intercomparison project (Venema et al., 2012). Three of these methods were selected for use in ACORN-SAT version 2, the selection primarily based on ease of implementation. These methods were:• • HOMER version 2.6, joint detection (Mestre et al., 2013)• • MASH version 3.03 (Szentimrey, 2008).• • RHTests version 4 (Wang et al., 2010).All of these methods, which use different statistical approaches, have been successfully used across a range of networks since their development. Further details on their implementation are given in Appendix Cahaya Kristal Child Learning Center favorite part is that reference at the end to “Appendix C.” This document has no Appendix C. There are three appendices, numbered Appendix 1, Appendix 2 and Appendix 3. That’s about the intellectual level we are dealing with.Anyway, try going to this document and see if you can figure out what they are doing. Believe me, you can’t.And finally: over the years as I have accumulated posts on this topic, several commenters have suggested that I must be alleging some kind of conspiracy among government climate scientists in making these adjustments. I mean, without that, how does it come about that the Australians just happen to be making the exact same kinds of adjustments as NASA, NOAA, and for that matter, as the Brits at the Hadley Center in the UK?If your brain is wondering how that could be, I would suggest that we have the same kind of phenomenon going on here as the hate crime hoax phenomenon. How does Jussie Smollett just happen to fake a hate crime playing right into the progressive narrative of the moment — just as did the Duke lacrosse team hoaxer, and the Virginia fraternity hoaxer, and the Harvard Law School black tape hoaxers, and many dozens of others? (Here is a compilation of some 15 recent hate crime hoaxes.) Did they all coordinate in one grand conspiracy? Or did they all just realize what was needed from them to support their “team” and its narrative?The Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time -- Part XX — Manhattan ContrarianTemperatures are falling not rising by 0.4* C over the past few years.We are in an ice age and only just recovering from the very recent Little Ice Age so more warming is great and is certainly nothing to try to stop.If the temperature was so hot the last 5 years why is there a hockey stick increase in Arctic ice?The Antarctic is larger in size than the USA and the weather has not been above zero since 1960. The earth is still in an ice age and polar ice is the most relevant indicia.Where did the claim of 5 warmest years come from because if it is climate models they are false.The US has the best and only reliable weather stations going back 100 years and they clearly show temperatures declining (see graph) as you would expect when we are recording weather during an ice age.“MILDER WINTER TEMPERATURES WILL DECREASE HEAVY SNOWSTORMS”False prediction of the UN in 2001, although the reason made sense as part of the theory that global warming was happening at break neck speed. Winter weather is surely key to any real evidence of climate change from the current ice age interglacial to tropical like climate. The very definition of an ice age is about polar ice being present annually and as long as there is lots of winter snow the glaciers are not going away. The moderate winter projection could not be wrong.. as in factl winters have been early everywhere with heavy snowfall and brutal storms. This key winter evidence means there is no unnatural global warming only the recovery from the Little Ice Age during cyclical warming ocean currents.For every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction. In weather, that tends to be hot/dry and cold/snow. In 2000, scientists at CRU said snow is a thing of the past. IPCC, 2001: "Milder winter temps. will decrease heavy snowstorms." But now they cause it? Makes no sense.7:10 AM · Sep 30, 2019·Twitter for Androidhttps://twitter.com/ChrisMartzWX/status/1178673478712602624/likeshttps://twitter.com/ChrisMartzWX/status/1178673478712602624/likesNow snowing heavily in 8 states and 5 provinces in North America - in SeptemberRobert W. FelixIce Age NowSun, 29 Sep 2019 19:39 UTC© Karen Manzer ‏This will be a "Major To Historic Winter Storm in the northern Rockies," warns the National Weather Service."A powerful storm system will produce several feet or more of wet, heavy snow; and gusty winds in the Northern Rockies," says the NWS. "Snow is also forecast along the Rocky Mountain Front, portions of the Great Basin, and other northwestern Mountains. Trees with leaves will be vulnerable to damage. Heavy snow and strong winds will make travel difficult to impossible in places."The trees are still fully loaded with foliage, so the strong winds and heavy, wet snow is expected is to bring down trees and power lines leading to widespread power outages.As of Sunday morning, http://accuweather.com weather maps showed snow or snow showers in Washington, Oregon, Nevada, Idaho, Utah, Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario.Kyle Brittain@KyleTWNMan wades through deep snow, enjoys it#abstorm @weathernetwork363Man wades through deep snow, enjoys it#abstorm @weathernetwork pic.twitter.com/iLDDvFazd9— Kyle Brittain (@KyleTWN) September 29, 2019· Improvement District No. 4 Waterton, AlbertaTwitter Ads info and privacyThe winterlike storm is unleashing feet of snow and life-threatening conditions in northwestern US, warned Accuweather.East-facing slopes of the Sawtooth, Flathead and Lewis and Clark ranges in Montana will experience the heaviest amount of snow, 2-3 feet (60-91 cm) to as much as 65 inches (122 cm).However, a general 1-2 feet (30-60 cm) of snow will fall over the mountains with anywhere from a bit of slush to several inches of snow at low elevations.Bitter cold to last for daysPerhaps even worse is that residents who lose power will face subfreezing temperatures approaching zero F in some areas, says accuweather.These bitterly cold conditions are expected to last for days after the storm.Global-warming adherents warn of cataclysmic consequences years down the road, but this 'winterlike' storm is producing life-threatening conditions right now.Which would you prefer? Global warming? Or almost sub-zero temperatures with no heat or electricity?JWSpry@JWSpry·❄️ SNOW will become “A very rare/exciting event. Children aren’t going to know what snow is.” – Dr. Viner (2000)❄️ “Goodbye winter. Never again snow?” Spiegel (2000)❄️ “..decrease heavy snowstorms” IPCC (2001)❄️ “End of Snow?” NYTimes (2014) https://t.co/viCi8EDdjT via @JWSpry https://t.co/hL07VgAXWj— JWSpry 🇦🇶 (@JWSpry) September 30, 2019SNOW will become “A very rare/exciting event. Children aren’t going to know what snow is.” – Dr. Viner (2000)“Goodbye winter. Never again snow?” Spiegel (2000)“..decrease heavy snowstorms” IPCC (2001)“End of Snow?” NYTimes (2014) http://climatism.blog/2019/09/14/cli via@JWSpryThanks to Roger Higgs for this link.There are many studies that show climate scientists have tampered with temperature data to make the climate appear warmer than reality. The most outrageous was Michael Mann erasing the accepted science of the Medieval Warming Period and the Little Ice Age to claim unprecedented warming today. FALSE.Ball attacked Mann who sued Ball for libel and lost last month in the Supreme Court of BC.UPDATE – Dr. Tim Ball wins @MichaelEMann lawsuit – Mann “hides the decline” AGAINAnthony Watts / August 22, 2019Original title before update: Breaking: Dr. Tim Ball wins @MichaelEMann lawsuit – Mann has to paySee the update below.Readers surely recall that the easily offended Dr. Michael Mann launched a court case for defamation against climate skeptic Dr. Tim Ball of Canada.In Feburary 2018 there was a complete dismissal in the lawsuit brought against Dr. Ball by Andrew Weaver of Canada, also for “defamation”.The Weaver defamation case involved an article Ball wrote saying that the IPCC had diverted almost all climate research funding and scientific investigation to anthropogenic global warming (AGW). This meant that there was virtually no advance in the wider understanding of climate and climate change. Ball referenced an interview with Weaver and attempts by a student to arrange a debate. Ball made some comments that were not fully substantiated, so they became the base of the defamation lawsuit.That case was completely dismissed, you can read more here.Now in the Mann case, which goes back to 2011, there’s also a complete dismissal. Ball wrote to me less than an hour ago, asking me to announce it here.He writes:Hi AnthonyMichael Mann’s case against me was dismissed this morning by the BC Supreme Court and they awarded me [court] costs.Tim BallThis is a developing story, I’ll add more as we know more.UPDATE – Dr. Tim Ball wins @MichaelEMann lawsuit – Mann “hides the decline” AGAINNASA pulls climate data out of hats like rabbitsBy Dr. Jay Lehr |September 1st, 2019|Climate|72 CommentsLate last year NASA scientist Martin Mlynczak, announced that the Earth may be cooling. It was surprise because data manipulation has been going on for many years at both NOAA (National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency) and NASA (National Aeronautic and Space Agency).The most current temperature curves produced by these agencies track well with the increases in man’s carbon dioxide emissions in recent decades. However a few years earlier the data presented looked nothing like that of more recent times.For years Climate activists in charge of NOAA and NASA were surprised that their own data and satellite measurements had been showing the climate to be stable or cooling since 1998 while CO2 levels had continued to rise. They were under intense pressure to explain how this could be in the face of all the alarmist reports put out by the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). It was time to resort to the strategy that progressives use in times of crisis. If you do not like the facts, ignore them. The publication Frontiers of Freedom in their February 23, 2016 issue documented what has been done in an article by T. Richard titled “How NOAA Rewrote Climate Data to Hide Global Warming Pause”.http://httpe://www.ff.org/how-noaa-rewrote-climate-data-to-hide-global-warming-pause/.The falsification of climate data by NOAA and NASA covers more than just the past decade. The U.S. has published temperature data beginning in 1880 up to the present. Tony Heller shows how their data has been tinkered with many times in past years, in The History of NASA/NOAA Temperature Corruption posted at https://realclimatescience.com/2016/01/the-history-of-nasanoaa-temperature-corruption/.The graph of the NASA data from 1880 to the year 2000 (below) was posted in 1999. On the same chart is the data NASA posted for the very same years in 2016. This obvious alteration of reality should be an embarrassment to NASA, but appears not to be.Representative Lamar Smith former chair of the House of Representatives Science and Technology Committee demanded that NOAA and NASA produce their data for independent analysis. NOAA refused to release the subpoenaed documents. Judicial Watch has sued NOAA under the Freedom of Information Act to obtain access to their data. So far nothing has been turned over.The climate curve recalculated in 2016 is now in complete agreement with the global warming movement. The cooling trend between 1940 and 1970 has been eliminated. The data now show that temperatures are increasing along with our rising carbon dioxide. The new curve shows the Earth’s temperature increased 1.4 degrees C since 1880. Temperatures that are out of line with the prediction of alarmists are gradually and systematically adjusted and replaced by corrected computer-generated temperatures. Children who are fed this new data are being recruited to beg us to save their futures.The truth seeping out from NASA was first reported in the New American magazine by James Murphy in October of 2018 where he quoted Martin Mlynczak of NASA’s Langley Research Center saying “High above Earths’s surface, near the edge of space, our atmosphere is losing heat energy. If current trends continue, it could soon set a Space Age record for cold” Major media outlets completely ignored this information.This new revelation comes from NASA’s SABER instrument aboard NASA’s TIMED satellite. In plain talk SABER stands for Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry and TIMED stands for the Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics.SABER monitors infrared radiation from carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide which are two of the gases that play a major role in releasing energy from the thermosphere at the top of our atmosphere which encapsulates our planets heat. Mlynczak, who is the associate principal investigator for SABER said “the thermosphere always cools off during Solar Minimums. It’s one of the most important ways the solar cycle effects our planet”.Solar Minimums as the words would indicate are periods of less activity spawning a decrease in radiation launched toward the Earth.While pondering this surprise comment from NASA in a January 30, 2019 post, author Michael Sherlock said “all any of this proves is that we have at best, a cursory understanding of Earth’s incredibly complex climate system. So when mainstream media and carbon credit salesman Al Gore breathlessly warn you that we must do something about climate change, it’s alright to step back, take a deep breath, and realize that we don’t have the knowledge, skill or resources to have much effect on the Earth’s climate.”Author·Dr. Jay LehrJay Lehr is the author of more than 1,000 magazine and journal articles and 36 books. He is an internationally renowned scientist, author and speaker who has testified before Congress on dozens of occasions on environmental issues and consulted with nearly every agency of the national government, as well as many foreign countries. He is a leading authority on groundwater hydrology.https://www.cfact.org/2019/09/01/nasa-pulls-climate-data-out-of-hats-like-rabbits/QUORAHow do those who see no climate problem account for the fact that the last 50 years has seen global land surface temperature rise faster than at any previously recorded time in the planet's history?Paul NoelPaul Noel, former Research Scientist 6 Level 2 UAH Huntsville Al. (2009-2014)Answered 22h agoIt works this way. You establish a weather station sensor set to take care of an airport in 1910. The airport is a grass strip way out in the country. Times change the airport gets paved then the parking areas grow. Then industry grows. Finally your sensors are outside a building surrounded by paved areas and right next to an AC unit. If you cannot figure this out you are lost.This is called a site error. All weather sets relocated to proper locations have all shown NO temperature rise. If anything they show declines.Or maybe you didn’t know that almost all weather stations are associated with airports?954 views · View Upvoters · View Sharers · Answer requested by Vaughan PrattTL Winslow, Ross Firestone, Dee Francis Padamadan, and Richard Dress upvoted thisJames MatkinRoss Firestone22h ago · 3 upvotesI know of a larger site error than airports:: a weather station next to a power sub-station with air cooled transformers. When the electricity demand is high on a hot summer’s day, the cooling fans blow hot air directly on the temperature sensor producing Phoenix-high temperatures.William Sheridan21h ago · 4 upvotesYour claim about rate of change is , well, scientific bullshit. Here are the interglacial periods in the mere 450,000 years ago to now. Historically, we should be about 2°C hotter.1976 Shock News : No Climate Disaster PendingPosted on May 27, 2014by stevengoddardNo warming in the mid-Atlantic states since 1800, and no climate disaster pending.TimesMachine: February 22, 1976 – NYTimes.com

Be careful, there are far more than 18 science organizations who deny there is any danger from man-made global warming. Also not all science organizations are equal or as relevant as all others. For example, climatologists are at the centre of climate science. They study of the myriad factors that influence weather, and the influence of weather on the environment. These include water, atmosphere, and geology. Climatology studies all of these things over the course of time, typically a 30 year cycle. The American Association of State Climatologists Unlike geologists, astrophysists, chemists and ecologists climate science is the full time primary interest and research of climatologists. Therefore, when the climatologist science organization denies thee man-made unprecedented global warming theory this is very relevant.American Association of State ClimatologistsState Climatologists are Skeptical of Global Warming“Having just returned from the annual meeting of the American Association of State Climatologists (for which I will be President for the next year), I can tell you that there is a great deal of global warming skepticism among my colleagues. For every outspoken scientist like Pat Michaels there are dozens of less verbose but equally committed men and women who do not buy into the Administration's point of view. Far from being a "done deal," the global warming scenarios are looking shakier and shakier. I have encouraged the other state climatologists to speak up on this issue and intend to be a spokesman myself (see, for example, July 25 1998 Science News). It's interesting to me that the tactics of the "advocates" seems to be to 1) call the other side names ("pseudo-scientists") and 2) declare the debate over ("the vast majority of credible scientists believe..."). I'm grateful for those who are running top-notch Web sites (SEPP, junkscience, John Daly, Doug Hoyt, Pat Michaels, etc.) to keep the dialogue open and enable us to share relevant information and scientific data (and also provide encouragement).”George Taylor, State ClimatologistOregon Climate Service316 Strand HallOregon State UniversityCorvallis OR 97331-2209http://www.ocs.orst.eduJapan Society of Energy and Resources was founded in 1980. (1791 MEMBERS)It is an academic society to promote the science and technology concerning energy and resources, and thus to facilitate cooperation among industry, academia and governmental sectors for coping with the problems in this field.“Subcomittee of Japan’s Society of Energy and Resources disses the IPCC – says “recent climate change is driven by natural cycles, not human industrial activity”By Andrew Orlowski The Register UK (h/t) from WUWT reader Ric WermeExclusive Japanese scientists have made a dramatic break with the UN and Western-backed hypothesis of climate change in a new report from its Energy Commission.Three of the five researchers disagree with the UN’s IPCC view that recent warming is primarily the consequence of man-made industrial emissions of greenhouse gases. Remarkably, the subtle and nuanced language typical in such reports has been set aside.One of the five contributors compares computer climate modelling to ancient astrology. Others castigate the paucity of the US ground temperature data set used to support the hypothesis, and declare that the unambiguous warming trend from the mid-part of the 20th Century has ceased.The report by Japan Society of Energy and Resources (JSER) is astonishing rebuke to international pressure, and a vote of confidence in Japan’s native marine and astronomical research. Publicly-funded science in the West uniformly backs the hypothesis that industrial influence is primarily responsible for climate change, although fissures have appeared recently. Only one of the five top Japanese scientists commissioned here concurs with the man-made global warming hypothesis.SummaryThree of the five leading scientists contend that recent climate change is driven by natural cycles, not human industrial activity, as political activists argue…Shunichi Akasofu, head of the International Arctic Research Center in Alaska, has expressed criticism of the theory before. Akasofu uses historical data to challenge the claim that very recent temperatures represent an anomaly:“We should be cautious, IPCC’s theory that atmospheric temperature has risen since 2000 in correspondence with CO2 is nothing but a hypothesis. ”Akasofu calls the post-2000 warming trend hypothetical. His harshest words are reserved for advocates who give conjecture the authority of fact.“Before anyone noticed, this hypothesis has been substituted for truth… The opinion that great disaster will really happen must be broken.”apan's boffins: Global warming isn't man-madeClimate science is 'ancient astrology', claims report”Anthony Watts / February 25, 200925 Feb 2009 at 12:23, Andrew OrlowskiKey Passages TranslatedWhat is the source of the rise in atmospheric temperature in the second half of the 20th century?Shunichi Akasofu[Founding Director of the International Arctic Research Center of the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF)Introductory discussion.Point 1.1: Global Warming has haltedGlobal mean temperature rose continuously from 1800-1850. The rate of increase was .05 degrees Celsius per 100 years. This was mostly unrelated to CO2 gas (CO2 began to increase suddenly after 1946. Until the sudden increase, the CO2 emissions rate had been almost unchanged for 100 years). However, since 2001, this increase halted. Despite this, CO2 emissions are still increasing.According to the IPCC panel, global atmospheric temperatures should continue to rise, so it is very likely that the hypothesis that the majority of global warming can be ascribed to the Greenhouse Effect is mistaken. There is no prediction of this halt in global warming in IPCC simulations. The halt of the increase in temperature, and slight downward trend is "something greater than the Greenhouse Effect," but it is in effect. What that "something" is, is natural variability.From this author's research into natural (CO2 emissions unrelated to human activity) climate change over the past 1000 years, it can be asserted that the global temperature increase up to today is primarily recovery from the "Little Ice Age" earth experienced from 1400 through 1800 (i.e. global warming rate of change＝0.5℃/100).The recovery in temperatures since follows a naturally variable 30-50 year cycle, (quasi-periodic variations), and in addition, this cycle has been positive since 1975, and peaked in the year 2000. This quasi-periodic cycle has passed its peak and has begun to turn negative.(The IPCC ascribes the positive change since 1975, for the most part, to CO2 and the Greenhouse Effect.) This quasi-periodic cycle fluctuates 0.1 degrees C per 10 years, short term (on the order of 50 years). This quasi-periodic cycle's amplitude is extremely pronounced in the Arctic Circle , so it is easy to understand. The previous quasi-periodic cycle was positive from 1910 to 1940 and negative from 1940 to 1975 (despite CO2 emissions rapid increase after 1946).Regardless of whether or not the IPCC has sufficiently researched natural variations, they claim that CO2 has increased particularly since 1975. Consequently, after 2000, although it should have continued to rise, atmospheric temperature stabilised completely (despite CO2 emissions continuing to increase). Since 1975 the chances of increase in natural variability (mainly quasiperiodic vibration) are high; moreover, the quasiperiodic vibration has turned negative. For that reason, in 2000 Global Warming stopped, after that, the negative cycle will probably continue.Regarding the current temporary condition (la Nina) JPL observes a fluctuation of the quasiperiodic cycle [JSER editor's note: this book is is still being proofed as of 12/19]. So we should be cautious, IPCC's theory that atmospheric temperature has risen since 2000 in correspondence with CO2 is nothing but a hypothesis.They should have verified this hypothesis by supercomputer, but before anyone noticed, this hypothesis has been substituted for "truth". This truth is not observationally accurate testimony. This is sidestepping of global warming theory with quick and easy answers, so the opinion that a great disaster will really happen must be broken.It seems that global warming and the halting of the temperature rise are related to solar activity. Currently, the sun is "hibernating". The end of Sunspot Cycle 23 is already two years late: the cycle should have started in 2007, yet in January 2008 only one sunspot appeared in the sun's northern hemisphere, after that, they vanished completely (new sunspots have now begun to appear in the northern hemisphere). At the current time, it can clearly be seen there are no spots in the photosphere. Lately, solar winds are at their lowest levels in 50 years. Cycle 24 is overdue, and this is is worrisome.American Institute of Professional Geologists: your local geoscientistsDecember 13, 2013“American Institute of Professional Geologists (AIPG) national president Ronald Wallace and Tennessee Section president Todd McFarland (Nashville office of AMEC Earth and Environmental, Inc.) visited Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) on December 5th for an AIPG section meeting. ..“From an education perspective, one of the differences between AIPG and two of the other major geoscience societies, the Geological Society of America and the American Geophysical Union, is that a substantial number of AIPG members have expressed skepticism about the extent to which human activity is to blame for global warming during the last 150 years. In contrast, the Geological Society of America (position statement) and the American Geophysical Union (position statement) follow the lead of most climate scientists in attributing most of the warming to human activity.”“I do not know a single geologist who believes that (global warming ) is a man-made phenonomon.”Peter Sciaky Senate testimony, Oct. 29, 2007, Congressional Record, Senate, Vol. 153. Pt. 20YES, assuming there are 18 science organization who follow Al Gore’s flawed inconvenient truth about the climate change they are wrong. There is no consensus about the UN IPCC hypothesis of man-made global warming increasingly leading scientists discredit the idea as unproven, non falsifiable pseudo-science.“Earth’s climate has always changed. 12,000 years ago most of North America was covered in over a mile of ice and the oceans were 400 feet lower! America has been warming ever since. We will continue to warm or we could go back into our current ice age.Ice ages are bad because food doesn’t grow well and billions of Humans will either starve or freeze to death. Warming is good because we all live and prosper.There is absolutely no evidence that Humans cause global warming. In fact, only the stars know if it will get hotter or colder and it is all up to that one star we call our sun.”“This is an important summary of the truth about Global Warming (aka Climate Change). The hoax is not that the climate is changing or that the globe is in a warming trend. The hoax is not that the increased energy production is causing man-made carbon dioxide levels to rise dramatically in the last 150 years and will continue as a result of improved prosperity in the third world. The hoax is not that water vapor and carbon dioxide are the end product of power plants and automobiles.No, the hoax is that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant but a plant fertilizer. And the biggest hoax is that carbon dioxide is not causing the temperature to increase. Water vapor, which is 100 times more abundant than carbon dioxide and regulated by the oceans, is the true and only real greenhouse gas, without which the whole earth would be covered in ice. Thus, all efforts to curb carbon dioxide production are a total waste of capital. “ “ The Two Hoaxes of Climate Change By Tomas de Paulis January 23, 2017 “ The Global Warming, Carbon Dioxide Hoax: Easy to Read Proof That Climate Change Is Normal and Not Man-Made, Alan Fensin - Amazon.comThe science community was duped by Al Gore and his inconvenient truth from misleading data. When Al Gore published his political manifesto about man-made global warming wining a nobel prize he created a band wagon effect everywhere. There was a kind of strange SOCIAL euphoria because Gore’s revelation about the climate crisis had a big upside, particularly for the political left. If carbon dioxide emissions in Green House Gases causing a catastrophic global warming then ending fossil fuel energy could also end fossil fuel pollution. Who could oppose such a marvellous positive anti- pollution fix including the development of shining wind and solar renewables? Not some 18 major science organizations who loved the impact of such a crusade. Notwithstanding, far more organizations are opposed see below. Yes, this caused a kind of virtuous conspiracy by scientists and politicians in favour of ridding the world of fossil fuel pollution in the name of climate change safety.A VIRTUOUS CONSPIRACY TO CURTAIL FOSSIL FUEL POLLUTIONThe end became more important than the analysis of the problem or climate theory and the “enlightened conspiracy” became fully partisan. It became political not scientific. Democrats against Republicans with Gore and Obama making coal the bulls eye or major villain of the fossil fuels.I posted a piece on Academia with the help of a famous climate scientist Richard C. Willson who summarized why Al Gore’s global warming theory is false and popular at the same time.Dr. Richard C Willson Astrophysics ExpertRe: "...climate alarmists have much exaggerated the impact of CO2."The CO2 anthropogenic global warming (CAGW) hypothesis has proved to be false. The predictions of the global circulation models on which CAGW is based have failed to match observational data both during the 'Industrial Era' and previous history. The thrust of recent research has demonstrated that climate changes continually and is determined by natural forces that humans have no significant control over.The CAGW hoax to curtail use of fossil fuels is perpetuated by (1) some cynical scientists that want to protect their CAGW careers and government grants; (2) cynical crony capitalists that make money related to carbon cap and trade fees, government subsidies or the related service industries; (3) Hyper-environmental activists who want to make feel-good gestures at public expense; (4) and political ideologues that want to redistribute wealth or impose population limits.Alternative renewable technologies will not be commercially viable in the foreseeable future. Renewable energy sources like solar and wind supply only 3 % of our energy use and that only works when the sun shines and the wind blows. Significant expansion of renewables will require massive investments in research and infrastructure, potentially distorting other more important social and economic priorities.Bottom line: Anti-fossil fuel policies based on CAGW are fools errands. There is no reason to sabotage world economies by failing to use fossil fuels, the most cost-effective form of energy, to the maximum extent possible.RICHARD C. WILLSONRESUME Education:B.S., Engineering Physics, University of Colorado (1960) M.S., Physics and Astrophysics, University of Colorado (1963) Ph.C. Atmospheric Physics, University of California at Los Angeles (1971) Ph.D. Atmospheric Physics, University of California at Los Angeles (1975) HONORS: NASA MEDAL FOR EXCEPTIONAL SCIENTIFIC ACHIEVEMENT (1981) HONORARY GRADUATE SCHOLASTIC FRATERNITY UCLA Member of the Working Group on Solar Influences on Global Change, Committee on Global Change, NRC (1990-94) Presenter to the NOAA Panel on Strategies for Climate ( Nov., 2000) Employer: Columbia University, Center for Climate Systems Research Position: Senior Research Scientist Principal Investigator for NASA ACRIM experiments Principal author of 56 climate research peer reviewed articles including advanced research on sun spots and solar irradiance. See Willson, R.C., Three Decades of Total Solar Irradiance Monitoring, (Poster GC23A),Co-convener of special session GC23A 2008 AGU Fall Meeting.COAL POWER NEEDED for 3 billion living in the dark - "It trumps solar power" in INDIA - SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN. "The green polemic is not grounded in reality.""Science organizations always short of funds saw an opportunity to fill their coffers with government funded research in the hundreds of billions of dollars. This is how the 18 science organizations were duped into drinking the cool aid in my opinion. They made the terrible mistake of over confidence about the validity of the alarmist theory. They should have been more cautious and admitted that the science is not settled. They were unscientific in their unqualified support.The Al Gore scary science hypothesis was like Y2K end impossible to falsify. It won him a nobel prize, but turned out later to be wrong. The theory failed. Facts demolished the fear mongering.Sea Level Rise: Just The Facts - "Sea levels falling.." says NASA research. Marshall Islands in no danger. Rise or fall annual data is statistically insignificant at the size of a dime.But CO2 is not pollution"CO2 is not a pollutant. In simple terms, CO2 is plant food. The green world we see around us would disappear if not for atmospheric CO2. These plants largely evolved at a time when the atmospheric CO2 concentration was many times what it is today. Indeed, numerous studies indicate the present biosphere is being invigorated by the human-induced rise of CO2. In and of itself, therefore, the increasing concentration of CO2 does not pose a toxic risk to the planet."- John R. Christy, Ph.D. Professor of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alabama"Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant but a naturally occurring, beneficial trace gas in the atmosphere. For the past few million years, the Earth has existed in a state of relative carbon dioxide starvation compared with earlier periods. There is no empirical evidence that levels double or even triple those of today will be harmful, climatically or otherwise. As a vital element in plant photosynthesis, carbon dioxide is the basis of the planetary food chain - literally the staff of life. Its increase in the atmosphere leads mainly to the greening of the planet. To label carbon dioxide a "pollutant" is an abuse of language, logic and science."- Robert M. Carter, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Environmental and Earth Sciences, James Cook UniversityThis political agenda of ending coal energy seems benign except sadly it is the greatest progressive reversal in all history for the > 2 billion living in energy poverty and needing coal to survive.James Matkin's answer to What is the tragedy of overconfidence about global warming climate science?Listen to a famous nobel physisist explain how his colleagues got it wrong.‪”Nobel laureate Ivar Giaever's speech at the Nobel Laureates meeting 1st July 2015.‪Ivar points out the mistakes which Obama makes in his speeches about global warming, and shares other not-well known facts about the state of the climate.”Also the Al Gore video show was supported by fraudulent data from the UN IPCC Michael Mann with the infamous misleading hockey stick showing dramatic warming that scared the public. From the start main stream, science community has been rewarded with research money and this has distorted their efforts too much on the one trick poney of life giving C02 when solar, ocean currents and wind formation etc. should have been examined, but no money for this much needed research. The result biased data collection and reports to show what the money wanted i.e. humans are the problem.Cheating for ParisAll the fakery confirms that the whole global warming crusade isn’t about science, but politics — and big money. (Pic: The Daily Telegraph)Read more: World leaders duped by manipulated global warming dataThe deception of the hockey stick fraud has been removed by the UN, but the damage is done. After the initial hoopla the real world climate has not helped the warmist’s crusade as truly none of the scary predictions like sea levels rising 4 feet and polar bears becoming extinct are likely and there is certainly no catastrophic warming even though much more CO2 is dumped into in the atmosphere.Doubt is always at the heart of science and uncertainty are veins of progress. The science of human-made global warming is in doubt, not a hoax, but the hypothesis is very much unproven and today it has a low probability of validity. There is global warming thankfully for the past 11,000 years to melt the massive glaciers covering the world, but nothing unprecedented.The warming is just the result of natural climate variation and not weak amounts of emissions of human fossil fuels in Green House Gases which are 95% water vapour.A closer look at the numbersThe climate is too chaotic and nonlinear to predict whether colder or warmer for more than 2 weeks. There are too many forces [like they said of Mozart - too many notes.] and those who pretend we can control the climate and moderate severe weather going forward by passing laws about carbon dioxide emissions are guilty of profound hubris. They are living in afantasy that has no basis in climate science. As the climate realist Lingen documents in his book THE FABLE OF A STABLE CLIMATE.I understand author of the QUORA question wonders how so many reputable science organizations “THE 18 SCIENCE ORGANIZATIONS” could be deceived. The alarmists make this an argument in their favour as though science is decided by consensus. It is not - just the opposite.THE DANGERS OF CONSENSUS SCIENCEGalileo - Darwin - Einstein"Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus..." - Michael Crichton, A.B. Anthropology, M.D. HarvardFurther there is no consensus on man-made climate change in the science community. A vast majority of organizations and scientists more than 100 are skeptical.National Post, 17 May 2005By Benny PeiserSix eminent researchers from the Russian Academy of Science and the IsraelSpace Agency have just published a startling paper in one of the world'sleading space science journals. The team of solar physicists claims to havecome up with compelling evidence that changes in cosmic ray intensity andvariations in solar activity have been driving much of the Earth's climate.They even provide a testable hypothesis, predicting that amplified cosmicray intensity will lead to an increase of the global cloud cover which,according to their calculations, will result in "some small global coolingover the next couple of years."I remain decidedly skeptical of such long-term climate predictions.Nevertheless, it is quite remarkable that the global mean temperature, asrecorded by NASA's global Land-Ocean Temperature Index, has actually droppedslightly during the last couple of years -- notwithstanding increased levelsof CO2 emissions. Two more years of cooling and we may even see thereappearance of a new Ice Age scare.Whatever one may think of these odd developments, the idea that the sun isthe principal driver of terrestrial climate has been gaining ground inrecent years. Last month, Jan Veizer, one of Canada's top Earth scientists,published a comprehensive review of recent findings and concluded that"empirical observations on all time scales point to celestial phenomena asthe principal driver of climate, with greenhouse gases acting only aspotential amplifiers."What the Russian, Israeli and Canadian researchers have in common is thatthey allocate much of the climate change to solar variability rather thanhuman causes. They also publish their papers in some of the world's leadingscientific journals. So why is it that a recent study published in theleading U.S. journal Science categorically claims that skeptical papersdon't exist in the peer-reviewed literature?http://www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=b93c1368-27b7-4f55-a60e-5b5d1b1ff38bHere is a partial list of science and other economic organizations who are on record with their doubts.“Skeptical Scientific Organizations:American Association of Petroleum Geologists (31,000+ Members)“The Climate Scientists' Register“We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous global warming."Click on country name in the following list to see endorsers from that nation: Algéria (1 endorser), Australia (8), Bulgaria (1), Canada (17), Denmark (1), Estonia (1), Finland(1), France (1), Germany (4), Greece (1), India (3), Italy (3), Luxembourg (1), Mexico (1), New Zealand (6), Norway (5), Poland (3), Russia (5), South Africa (1), Sweden(8), United Kingdom (6), United States of America (64).Complete Endorser List:Habibullo I. Abdussamatov, Dr. Sci., mathematician and astrophysicist, Head of the Russian-Ukrainian Astrometria project on the board of the Russian segment of the ISS, Head of Space Research Laboratory at the Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, RussiaSyun-Ichi Akasofu, PhD, Professor of Physics, Emeritus and Founding Director, International Arctic Research Center of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska, U.S.A.J.R. Alexander, Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa; Member, UN Scientific and Technical Committee on Natural Disasters, 1994-2000, Pretoria, South AfricaBjarne Andresen, Dr. Scient., physicist, published and presents on the impossibility of a "global temperature", Professor, Niels Bohr Institute (areas of specialization: fundamental physics and chemistry, in particular thermodynamics), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkTimothy F. Ball, PhD, environmental consultant and former climatology professor, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CanadaRomuald Bartnik, PhD (Organic Chemistry), Professor Emeritus, Former chairman of the Department of Organic and Applied Chemistry, climate work in cooperation with Department of Hydrology and Geological Museum, University of Lodz, Lodz, PolandColin Barton, http://B.Sc., PhD (Earth Science), Principal research scientist (retd), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaFranco Battaglia, PhD (Chemical Physics), Professor of Environmental Chemistry (climate specialties: environmental chemistry), University of Modena, ItalyDavid Bellamy, OBE, PhD, English botanist, author, broadcaster, environmental campaigner, Hon. Professor of Botany (Geography), University of Nottingham, Hon. Prof. Faculty of Engineering and Physical Systems, Central Queensland University, Hon. Prof. of Adult and Continuing Education, University of Durham, United Nations Environment Program Global 500 Award Winner, Dutch Order of The Golden Ark, Bishop Auckland County, Durham, United KingdomRichard Becherer, BS (Physics, Boston College), MS (Physics, University of Illinois), PhD (Optics, University of Rochester), former Member of the Technical Staff - MIT Lincoln Laboratory, former Adjunct Professor - University of Connecticut, Areas of Specialization: optical radiation physics, coauthor - standard reference book Optical Radiation Measurements: Radiometry, Millis, MA, U.S.A.Ernst-Georg Beck, Dipl. Biology (University of Freiburg), biologist (area of specialization: CO2 record in the last 150 years – see paper “Accurate estimation of CO2 background level from near ground measurements at non-mixed environments”), see http://www.biomind.de/realCO2/ for more from Mr. Beck, Biesheim, FranceEdwin Berry, PhD (Atmospheric Physics, Nevada), MA (Physics, Dartmouth), BS (Engineering, Caltech), President, Climate Physics LLC, Bigfork, MT, U.S.A.Sonja A. Boehmer-Christiansen, PhD, Reader Emeritus, Dept. of Geography, Hull University, Editor - Energy&Environment, Multi-Science (www.multi-science.co.uk), Hull, United KingdomM. I. Bhat, PhD, formerly Scientist at the Wadia institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehra, currently Professor & Head, Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Kashmir (areas of specialization: Geochemistry, Himalayan and global tectonics & tectonics and climate (Prof Bhat: “Arguing for deepening the climate frontiers by considering interaction between solar flares and core-mantle boundary processes. Clue possibly lies in exploring the tectonics of regions that underlies high and low pressure cells of the three global oscillations (SO, NAO, NPO)”), Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, IndiaAhmed Boucenna, PhD, Professor of Physics, Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Ferhat Abbas University, Setif, Algéria. Author of The Great Season Climatic Oscillation, I. RE. PHY. 1(2007) 53, The Great Season Climatic Oscillation and the Global Warming, Global Conference On Global Warming, July 6-10, 2008, Istanbul, Turkey and Pseudo Radiation Energy Amplifier (PREA) and the Mean Earth's Ground Temperature, arXiv:0811.0357 (November 2008)Antonio Brambati, PhD, Emeritus Professor (sedimentology), Department of Geological, Environmental and Marine Sciences (DiSGAM), University of Trieste (specialization: climate change as determined by Antarctic marine sediments), Trieste, ItalyStephen C. Brown, PhD (Environmental Science, State University of New York), District Agriculture Agent, Assistant Professor, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Ground Penetrating Radar Glacier research, Palmer, Alaska, U.S.A.Mark Lawrence Campbell, PhD (chemical physics; gas-phase kinetic research involving greenhouse gases (nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide)), Professor, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland, U.S.A.Robert M. Carter, PhD, Professor, Marine Geophysical Laboratory, James Cook University, Townsville, AustraliaArthur Chadwick, PhD (Molecular Biology), Research Professor, Department of Biology and Geology, Southwestern Adventist University, Climate Specialties: dendrochronology (determination of past climate states by tree ring analysis), palynology (same but using pollen as a climate proxy), paleobotany and botany; Keene, Texas, U.S.A.George V. Chilingar, PhD, Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.Antonis Christofides, Dipl. Civil Engineering, MSc Computing Science, Climate Specialties: co-author of relevant papers: here and here, author of http://hk-climate.org/, Athens, GreecePetr Chylek, PhD, Laboratory Fellow, Remote Sensing Team Leader, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, U.S.A.Ian D. Clark, PhD, Professor (isotope hydrogeology and paleoclimatology), Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaPaul Copper, BSc, MSc, PhD, DIC, FRSC, Professor Emeritus, Department of Earth Sciences, Laurentian University Sudbury, Ontario, CanadaCornelia Codreanova, Diploma in Geography, Researcher (Areas of Specialization: formation of glacial lakes) at Liberec University, Czech Republic, Zwenkau, GermanyMichael Coffman, PhD (Ecosystems Analysis and Climate Influences), CEO of Sovereignty International, President of Environmental Perspectives, Inc., Bangor, Maine, U.S.A.Piers Corbyn, MSc (Physics (Imperial College London)), ARCS, FRAS, FRMetS, astrophysicist (Queen Mary College, London), consultant, founder WeatherAction long range forecasters, London, United KingdomRichard S. Courtney, PhD, energy and environmental consultant, IPCC expert reviewer, Falmouth, Cornwall, United KingdomJoseph D’Aleo, BS, MS (Meteorology, University of Wisconsin), Doctoral Studies (NYU), Executive Director - ICECAP (International Climate and Environmental Change Assessment Project), Fellow of the AMS, College Professor Climatology/Meteorology, First Director of Meteorology The Weather Channel, Hudson, New Hampshire, U.S.A.David Deming, PhD (Geophysics), Associate Professor, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, U.S.A.James E Dent; http://B.Sc., FCIWEM, C.Met, FRMetS, C.Env., Independent Consultant, Member of WMO OPACHE Group on Flood Warning, Hadleigh, Suffolk, England, United KingdomChris R. de Freitas, PhD, climate Scientist, School of Environment, The University of Auckland, New ZealandWillem de Lange, MSc (Hons), DPhil (Computer and Earth Sciences), Senior Lecturer in Earth and Ocean Sciences, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New ZealandGeoff Duffy, DEng (Dr of Engineering), PhD (Chemical Engineering), BSc, ASTCDip., FRSNZ (first chemical engineer to be a Fellow of the Royal Society in NZ), FIChemE, wide experience in radiant heat transfer and drying, chemical equilibria, etc. Has reviewed, analysed, and written brief reports and papers on climate change, Auckland, New ZealandRobert W. Durrenberger, PhD, former Arizona State Climatologist and President of the American Association of State Climatologists, Professor Emeritus of Geography, Arizona State University; Sun City, Arizona, U.S.A.Don J. Easterbrook, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Geology, Western Washington, University, Bellingham, Washington, U.S.A.Willis Eschenbach, Independent Climate Researcher, Climate Specialties: Tropical tropospheric amplification, constructal theories of climate, See sample of scientific writings in Nature here, Occidental, CA, U.S.A.Christopher Essex, PhD, professor of applied mathematics, and Associate Chair, Department of Applied Mathematics, Former Director, Program in Theoretical Physics, University of Western Ontario, Former NSERC postdoc at the Canadian Climate Centre's Numerical Modelling Division (GCM), London, Ontario, CanadaPer Engene, MSc, Biologist, Bø i Telemark, Norway, Co-author - The Climate, Science and Politics (2009)Terrence F. Flower, PhD, Professor of Physics and Astronomy, St. Catherine University, studied and taught physics of climate (focus on Arctic and Antarctic), took students to study physics of climate change in the Antarctic and Costa Rica, St. Paul, Minnesota, U.S.A.Stewart Franks, BSci. (Hons, Environmental Science), PhD (Landsurface-atmosphere interactions), Associate Professor and Dean of Students, University of Newcastle, Climate Specialties: hydro-climatology, flood/drought risk, Newcastle, AustraliaLars Franzén, PhD (Physical Geography), Professor, Physical Geography at Earth Sciences Centre, University of Gothenburg, Areas of Specialization: Palaeoclimate from global peatland and Chinese loess studies - see related scientific paper by Franzén et al, Gothenburg, Vastra Gotaland, SwedenGordon Fulks, PhD (Physics, University of Chicago), cosmic radiation, solar wind, electromagnetic and geophysical phenomena, Corbett, Oregon, U.S.A.Robert. W. Gauldie, PhD, Research Professor (retired), Hawai'i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, School of Ocean Earth Sciences and Technology, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Hawaii, U.S.A.Katya Georgieva, MSc (Physics of the Earth, Atmosphere, and Space, specialty Meteorology), PhD (Solar-Terrestrial Physics - PhD thesis on solar influences on global climate changes), Associate Professor, Head of group "Solar dynamics and global climate change" in the Solar-Terrestrial Influences Laboratory at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, head of project "Solar activity influences of weather and climate" of the scientific plan of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, member of the "Climate changes" council of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Regional coordinator of the Balkan, Black sea and Caspian sea countries and member of the European Steering Committee for the International Heliophysical Year 2007-2008, deputy editor-in-chief of the international scientific journal "Sun and Geosphere", BulgariaLee C. Gerhard, PhD, Senior Scientist Emeritus, University of Kansas, past director and state geologist, Kansas Geological Survey, U.S.A.Gerhard Gerlich, Dr.rer.nat. (Mathematical Physics: Magnetohydrodynamics) habil. (Real Measure Manifolds), Professor, Institut für Mathematische Physik, Technische Universität Carolo-Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany, Co-author of “Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics”, Int.J.Mod.Phys.,2009Fred Goldberg, PhD, Adj Professor, Royal Institute of Technology (Mech, Eng.), Secretary General KTH International Climate Seminar 2006 and Climate analyst (NIPCC), Lidingö, SwedenStanley B. Goldenberg, Research Meteorologist, NOAA, AOML/Hurricane Research Division, Miami, Florida, U.S.A.Wayne Goodfellow, PhD (Earth Science), Ocean Evolution, Paleoenvironments, Adjunct Professor, Senior Research Scientist, University of Ottawa, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaThomas B. Gray, MS (Meteorology, California Institute of Technology and Florida State University), 23 years as Meteorologist with the U.S. Army and Air Force (retired) and 15 years experience with NOAA Environmental Research Laboratories. Assignments include Chief, Analysis and Forecast Division, Global Weather Center, Omaha, Nebraska and Chief, Solar Forecast Center, Boulder Colorado, maintains active interest in paleoclimate and atmospheric physics, Yachats, Oregon, U.S.A.Vincent Gray, PhD, New Zealand Climate Coalition, expert reviewer for the IPCC, author of The Greenhouse Delusion: A Critique of Climate Change 2001, Wellington, New ZealandWilliam M. Gray, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Head of the Tropical Meteorology Project, Fort Collins, Colorado, U.S.A.Kenneth P. Green, Doctor of Environmental Science and Engineering (UCLA, 1994), Resident Scholar, Interim Director, Center for Regulatory Studies, American Enterprise Institute, Washington D.C., U.S.A.Charles B. Hammons, PhD (Applied Mathematics), climate-related specialties: applied mathematics, modeling & simulation, software & systems engineering, Associate Professor, Graduate School of Management, University of Dallas; Assistant Professor, North Texas State University (Dr. Hammons found many serious flaws during a detailed study of the software, associated control files plus related email traffic of the Climate Research Unit temperature and other records and “adjustments” carried out in support of IPCC conclusions), Coyle, OK, U.S.A.William Happer, PhD, Professor, Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, U.S.A.Howard Hayden, PhD, Emeritus Professor (Physics), University of Connecticut, The Energy Advocate, Pueblo West, Colorado, U.S.A.Warren T. Hinds, B.S. (Engineering), M.S. (Atmospheric Sciences), PhD (Physical Ecology, U. Washington, Seattle), Sr. Scientist at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; consultant for USA EPA research on Global Climate Change Program, Specialist for Defense Programs, Department of Energy, Climate Specialties: atmospheric physics and quantitative empirical analyses regarding climatological, meteorological, and ecological responses to environmental stresses, Gainesville, Georgia, U.S.A.Art Horn, Meteorologist (honors, Lyndon State College, Lyndonville, Vermont), operator, The Art of Weather, U.S.A.Douglas Hoyt, B.S. (Physics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute), M.S. (Astro-Geophysics, University of Colorado), co-author of the book The Role of the Sun in climate Change, previously senior scientist at Raytheon (MODIS instrument development), with earlier employment at NOAA, NCAR, World Radiation Center and the Sacramento Peak Observatory, Berkeley Springs, West Virginia, U.S.A.Warwick Hughes, MSc Hons (Geology), Founder of the "Errors in IPCC Climate Science" Blog - http://www.warwickhughes.com/blog/, Areas of Specialization: Jones et al temperature data, Canberra, AustraliaOle Humlum, PhD, Professor of Physical Geography, Department of Physical Geography, Institute of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayCraig D. Idso, PhD, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A.Sherwood B. Idso, PhD, President, Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A.Larry Irons, BS (Geology), MS (Geology), Sr. Geophysicist at FairfieldNodal (Areas of Specialization: Paleoclimate), Lakewood, Colorado, U.S.A.Terri Jackson, MSc (plasma physics), MPhil (energy economics), Director, Independent Climate Research Group, Northern Ireland and London (Founder of the energy/climate group at the Institute of Physics, London), United KingdomAlbert F. Jacobs, Geol.Drs., P. Geol., Calgary, Alberta, CanadaZbigniew Jaworowski, PhD, DSc, professor of natural sciences, Senior Science Adviser of Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection, researcher on ice core CO2 records, Warsaw, PolandBill Kappel, BS (Physical Science-Geology), BS (Meteorology), Storm Analysis, Climatology, Operation Forecasting, Vice President/Senior Meteorologist, Applied Weather Associates, LLC, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, U.S.A.Olavi Kärner, Ph.D., Extraordinary Research Associate; Dept. of Atmospheric Physics, Tartu Observatory, Toravere, EstoniaMadhav L. Khandekar, PhD, consultant meteorolgist, (former) Research Scientist, Environment Canada, Editor "Climate Research” (03-05), Editorial Board Member "Natural Hazards, IPCC Expert Reviewer 2007, Unionville, Ontario, CanadaLeonid F. Khilyuk, PhD, Science Secretary, Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Professor of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.William Kininmonth MSc, MAdmin, former head of Australia’s National Climate Centre and a consultant to the World Meteorological organization’s Commission for Climatology, Kew, Victoria, AustraliaGerhard Kramm, Dr. rer. nat. (Theoretical Meteorology), Research Associate Professor, Geophysical Institute, Associate Faculty, College of Natural Science and Mathematics, University of Alaska Fairbanks, (climate specialties: Atmospheric energetics, physics of the atmospheric boundary layer, physical climatology - seeinteresting paper by Kramm et al), Fairbanks, Alaska, U.S.A.Leif Kullman, PhD (Physical geography, plant ecology, landscape ecology), Professor, Physical geography, Department of Ecology and Environmental science, Umeå University, Areas of Specialization: Paleoclimate (Holocene to the present), glaciology, vegetation history, impact of modern climate on the living landscape, Umeå, SwedenDouglas Leahey, PhD, meteorologist and air-quality consultant, President - Friends of Science, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaJay Lehr, BEng (Princeton), PhD (environmental science and ground water hydrology), Science Director, The Heartland Institute, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.Edward Liebsch, B.A. (Earth Science, St. Cloud State University); M.S. (Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University), former Associate Scientist, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; former Adjunct Professor of Meteorology, St. Cloud State University, Environmental Consultant/Air Quality Scientist (Areas of Specialization: micrometeorology, greenhouse gas emissions), Maple Grove, Minnesota, U.S.A.Richard S. Lindzen, PhD, Alfred P. Sloan professor of meteorology, Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.William Lindqvist, PhD (Applied Geology), Independent Geologic Consultant, Areas of Specialization: Climate Variation in the recent geologic past, Tiburon, California, U.S.A.Peter Link, BS, MS, PhD (Geology, Climatology), Geol/Paleoclimatology, retired, Active in Geol-paleoclimatology, Tulsa University and Industry, Evergreen, Colorado, U.S.A.Anthony R. Lupo, Ph.D., Professor of Atmospheric Science, Department of Soil, Environmental, and Atmospheric Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, U.S.A.Qing-Bin Lu, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, cross-appointed to Departments of Biology and Chemistry, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) New Investigator, University of Waterloo, Ontario, CanadaHorst Malberg, PhD, Professor (emeritus) for Meteorology and Climatology and former director of the Institute for Meteorology at the Free University of Berlin, GermanyBjörn Malmgren, PhD, Professor Emeritus in Marine Geology, Paleoclimate Science, Goteborg University, retired, Norrtälje, SwedenOliver Manuel, BS (Chem), MS (Geo-Chem), PhD (Nuclear Chem), Post-Doc (Space Physics), Fulbright Scholar (Astrophysics), NSF Post-Doc Fellow (UC-Berkeley), Associate - Climate & Solar Science Institute, Professor (now Emeritus)/Dept Chair, College of Arts & Sciences University of Missouri-Rolla, Fulbright Scholar (Tata Institute- Mumbai), previously Research Scientist (US Geological Survey-Denver) and NASA Principal Investigator for Apollo, Climate Specialties: Earth's heat source, sample of relevant papers: "Earth's heat source - the Sun", Energy and Environment 20 131-144 (2009); “The sun: a magnetic plasma diffuser that controls earth's climate”, paper presented at the V. International Conference on Non-accelerator New Physics, Dubna, Russia, 20 June 2005; "Super-fluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate", Journal of Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002), Cape Girardeau, Missouri, U.S.A.David Manuta, Ph.D. (Inorganic/Physical Chemistry, SUNY Binghamton), FAIC, Climate Specialties: Gas Phase Infrared Studies, Thermodynamics of Small Molecule Formation (e.g., CO2, HF, and H2O), President, Manuta Chemical Consulting, Inc., Chairman of the Board, The American Institute of Chemists, Past Positions include Adjunct Professor of Physics, Ohio University-Chillicothe, Ohio, Assistant Professor of Chemistry and Physical Science at Shawnee State University, Ohio, Assistant Professor of Chemistry and Physical Science at Upper Iowa University and US Enrichment Corp. (nuclear), Waverly, Ohio, USAFrancis Massen, PhD, Physics Lab and meteoLCD, Lycée Classique de Diekirch, 32 av. de la gare L-9233, (see interesting scientific paper by Massen et al), Diekirch, LuxembourgIrina Melnikova, PhD (Physics & Mathematics), Head of the Laboratory for Physics of the Atmosphere INENCO RAN, specialization: radiative regime of the cloudy atmosphere - see interesting paper on this topic by Dr. Melnikova, St. Petersburg, RussiaPatrick J. Michaels, A.B., S.M., Ph.D. (ecological climatology, Senior Fellow in Environmental Studies, CATO Institute, Distinguished Senior Fellow in the School of Public Policy, George Mason University, a past president of the American Association of State Climatologists, past program chair for the Committee on Applied Climatology of the American Meteorological Society, past research professor of Environmental Sciences at University of Virginia, contributing author and reviewer of the UN IPCC, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.Fred Michel, PhD, Director, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Associate Professor of Earth Sciences, Carleton University (article by Dr. Michel: “Climatic hubris: The Ellesmere Island ice shelves have been disappearing since they were first mapped in 1906”, January 16, 2007, National Post), Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaFerenc Mark Miskolczi, PhD, atmospheric physicist, formerly of NASA's Langley Research Center, (in his 2010 paper, Dr. Miskolczi writes, "The data negate increase in CO2 in the atmosphere as a hypothetical cause for the apparently observed global warming. A hypothesis of significant positive feedback by water vapor effect on atmospheric infrared absorption is also negated by the observed measurements. Apparently major revision of the physics underlying the greenhouse effect is needed."), Hampton, Virginia, U.S.A.Asmunn Moene, PhD, MSc (Meteorology), former head of the Forecasting Centre, Meteorological Institute, Oslo, NorwayNils-Axel Mörner, PhD (Sea Level Changes and Climate), Emeritus Professor of Paleogeophysics & Geodynamics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenNasif Nahle, BSc (Biology), C-1L on Scientific Research, climatology and meteorology, physics, and paleobiology, Director of Scientific Research at Biology Cabinet (Areas of Specialization: Climatology and Meteorology (certification), San Nicolas de los Garza, Nuevo Leon, MexicoDavid Nowell, http://M.Sc., Fellow of the Royal Meteorological Society, former chairman of the NATO Meteorological Group, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaJames J. O'Brien, PhD., Emeritus Professor, Meteorology and Oceanography, Florida State University, Florida, U.S.A.Peter Oliver, BSc (Geology), BSc (Hons, Geochemistry & Geophysics), MSc (Geochemistry), PhD (Geology), specialized in NZ quaternary glaciations, Geochemistry and Paleomagnetism, previously research scientist for the NZ Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Upper Hutt, New ZealandCliff Ollier, http://D.Sc., Professor Emeritus (School of Earth and Environment - see his Copenhagen Climate Challenge sea level article here), Research Fellow, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, W.A., AustraliaR. Timothy Patterson, PhD, Professor, Dept. of Earth Sciences (paleoclimatology), Carleton University, Chair - International Climate Science Coalition, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaAlfred H. Pekarek, PhD, Associate Professor of Geology, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Deptartment, St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minnesota, U.S.A.Stanley Penkala, BS (Chemical Engineering, Univ. of PA), PhD (Chemical Engineering, Univ. of PA.), Asst. Prof. Air Engineering and Industrial Hygiene, University of Pittsburgh GSPH (1970-1973), Environmental Scientist, DeNardo & McFarland Weather Services (1973-1980), Air Science Consultants, Inc. (VP 1980-1995, President 1995-Present), Areas of Specialization: Air Dispersion Modeling, Anthropogenic Sources of Global CO2, Quality Assurance in Air Pollution Measurements, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.Ian Plimer, PhD, Professor of Mining Geology, The University of Adelaide; Emeritus Professor of Earth Sciences, The University of Melbourne, AustraliaOleg M. Pokrovsky, BS, MS, PhD (mathematics and atmospheric physics - St. Petersburg State University, 1970), Dr. in Phys. and Math Sciences (1985), Professor in Geophysics (1995), principal scientist, Main Geophysical Observatory (RosHydroMet), St. Petersburg, Russia. Note: Dr. Pokrovsky carried out comprehensive analysis of many available long climate time series and came to conclusion that anthropogenic CO2 impact is not main contributor in climate change as declared by IPCC.Daniel Joseph Pounder, BS (Meteorology, University of Oklahoma), MS (Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign); Meteorological/Oceanographic Data Analyst for the National Data Buoy Center, formerly Meteorologist, WILL AM/FM/TV, Urbana, U.S.A.Brian Pratt, PhD, Professor of Geology (Sedimentology), University of Saskatchewan (see Professor Pratt's article for a summary of his views), Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CanadaTom Quirk, MSc (Melbourne), D Phil (physics), MA (Oxford), SMP (Harvard), Member of the Scientific Advisory Panel of the Australian climate Science Coalition, Member Board Institute of Public Affairs, Melbourne, Areas of Specialization: Methane, Decadal Oscillations, Isotopes, Victoria, AustraliaVijay Kumar Raina, Ex. Deputy Director General, Geological Survey of India, author of 2010 MoEF Discussion Paper, “Himalayan Glaciers - State-of-Art Review of Glacial Studies, Glacial Retreat and Climate Change”, the first comprehensive study on the region. Mr. Raina’s field activities covered extensive research on the geology and the glaciers of the Himalayas, Andaman Islands that included research on the volcanoes in the Bay of Bengal. He led two Indian Scientific Expeditions to Antarctica that earned him the National Mineral Award and the Antarctica Award. He has authored over 100 scientific papers and three books: ‘Glacier Atlas of India’ dealing with various aspects of glacier studies under taken in the Himalayas; ‘Glaciers, the rivers of ice’ and ‘Images Antarctica, Reminiscences’, Chandigarh, IndiaDenis Rancourt, http://B.Sc., http://M.Sc., Ph.D. (Physics), Former physics professor, University of Ottawa (then funded by NSERC in both physics and environmental science), Climate Specialties: global carbon cycle and environmental nanoparticles science, statistical physics, as well as the politics, sociology and psychology of the climate debate, current research includes radiative effects and phenomena (albedo, greenhouse effect), Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaOleg Raspopov, Doctor of Science and Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Professor - Geophysics, Senior Scientist, St. Petersburg Filial (Branch) of N.V.Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radiowaves Propagetion of RAS (climate specialty: climate in the past, particularly the influence of solar variability), Editor-in-Chief of journal "Geomagnetism and Aeronomy" (published by Russian Academy of Sciences), St. Petersburg, RussiaS. Jeevananda Reddy, http://M.Sc. (Geophysics), Post Graduate Diploma (Applied Statistics, Andhra University), PhD (Agricultural Meteorology, Australian University, Canberra), Formerly Chief Technical Advisor -- United Nations World Meteorological Organization (WMO) & Expert-Food and Agriculture Organization (UN), Convenor - Forum for a Sustainable Environment, author of 500 scientific articles and several books - here is one: "Climate Change - Myths & Realities", Hyderabad, IndiaGeorge A. Reilly, PhD (Geology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor), areas of specialization: Geological aspects of paleoclimatology, Retired, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CanadaRobert G. Roper, PhD, DSc (University of Adelaide, South Australia), Emeritus Professor of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A.Nicola Scafetta, PhD (Physics, 2001, University of North Texas), Laurea (Dottore in Physics, 1997, Universita’ di Pisa, Italy), Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor Experiment (ACRIM), Climate Specialties: solar and astronomical causes of climate change, see intresting paper by Scafetta on this), Research Scientist - Physics, Duke University, Durham, NC, U.S.A.Rob Scagel, MSc (forest microclimate specialist), Principal Consultant - Pacific Phytometric Consultants, Surrey, British Columbia, CanadaTom V. Segalstad, PhD (Geology/Geochemistry), secondary Web page here, Head of the Geological Museum, Natural History Museum and Associate Professor of Resource and Environmental Geology, University of Oslo, NorwayGary Sharp, PhD, Center for Climate/Ocean Resources Study, Salinas, California, U.S.A.Thomas P. Sheahen, PhD (Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology), specialist in renewable energy, research and publication (applied optics) in modeling and measurement of absorption of infrared radiation by atmospheric CO2, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2005-2008); Argonne National Laboratory (1988-1992); Bell Telephone labs (1966-73), National Bureau of Standards (1975-83), Oakland, Maryland, U.S.A.S. Fred Singer, PhD, Professor Emeritus (Environmental Sciences), University of Virginia, former director, U.S. Weather Satellite Service, Science and Environmental Policy Project, Charlottesville, Virginia, U.S.A.Jan-Erik Solheim, MSc (Astrophysics), Professor, Institute of Physics, University of Tromso, Norway (1971-2002), Professor (emeritus), Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, Norway (1965-1970, 2002- present), climate specialties: sun and periodic climate variations, scientific paper by Professor Solheim "Solen varsler et kaldere tiår", Baerum, NorwayRoy W. Spencer, PhD, climatologist, Principal Research Scientist, Earth System Science Center, The University of Alabama, Huntsville, Alabama, U.S.A.H. Leighton Steward, Master of Science (Geology), Areas of Specialization: paleoclimates and empirical evidence that indicates CO2 is not a significant driver of climate change, Chairman, PlantsNeedCO2.org and CO2IsGreen.org, Chairman of the Institute for the Study of Earth and Man (geology, archeology & anthropology) at SMU in Dallas, Texas, Boerne, TX, U.S.A.Peter Stilbs, TeknD, Professor of Physical Chemistry, Research Leader, School of Chemical Science and Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), member of American Chemical Society and life member of American Physical Society, Chair of "Global Warming - Scientific Controversies in Climate Variability", International seminar meeting at KTH, 2006, Stockholm, SwedenEdward (Ted) R. Swart, http://D.Sc. (physical chemistry, University of Pretoria), http://B.Sc. (chem eng.) and Ph.D. (math/computer science, University of Witwatersrand). Dean of the Faculty of Science, Professor and Head of the Department of Computer Science, University of Rhodesia and past President of the Rhodesia Scientific Association. Set up the first radiocarbon dating laboratory in Africa with funds from the Gulbenkian Foundation. Professor in the Department of Combinatorics and Optimization at the University of Waterloo and Chair of Computing and Information Science and Acting Dean at the University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Now retired in Kelowna, British Columbia, CanadaRoger Tanner, PhD (Analytical Chemistry, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana), 40-yr career in atmospheric chemistry and air quality measurement science at Tennessee Valley Authority, Desert Research Institute, Reno, and Brookhaven National Lab, Climate Specialties: atmospheric chemistry and air quality measurement science, Florence, Alabama, U.S.A.George H. Taylor, B.A. (Mathematics, U.C. Santa Barbara), M.S. (Meteorology, University of Utah), Certified Consulting Meteorologist, Applied Climate Services, LLC, Former State Climatologist (Oregon), President, American Association of State Climatologists (1998-2000), Corvallis, Oregon, U.S.A.Frank Tipler, PhD, Professor of Mathematical Physics, astrophysics, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A.Edward M. Tomlinson, MS (Meteorology), Ph.D. (Meteorology, University of Utah), President, Applied Weather Associates, LLC (leader in extreme rainfall storm analyses), 21 years US Air Force in meteorology (Air Weather Service), Monument, Colorado, U.S.A.Ralf D. Tscheuschner, Dr.rer.nat. (Theoretical physics: Quantum Theory), Freelance Lecturer and Researcher in Physics and Applied Informatics, Hamburg, Germany. Co-author of “Falsification of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics, Int.J.Mod.Phys. 2009Göran Tullberg, Civilingenjör i Kemi (equivalent to Masters of Chemical Engineering), Co-author - The Climate, Science and Politics (2009) (see here for a review), formerly instructor of Organic Chemistry (specialization in “Climate chemistry”), Environmental Control and Environmental Protection Engineering at University in Växjö; Falsterbo, SwedenBrian Gregory Valentine, PhD, Adjunct professor of engineering (aero and fluid dynamics specialization) at the University of Maryland, Technical manager at US Department of Energy, for large-scale modeling of atmospheric pollution, Technical referee for the US Department of Energy's Office of Science programs in climate and atmospheric modeling conducted at American Universities and National Labs, Washington, DC, U.S.A.Gerrit J. van der Lingen, PhD (Utrecht University), geologist and paleoclimatologist, climate change consultant, Geoscience Research and Investigations, Christchurch, New ZealandA.J. (Tom) van Loon, PhD, Professor of Geology (Quaternary Geologyspecialism: Glacial Geology), Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland; former President of the European Association of Science EditorsMichael G. Vershovsky, Ph.D. in meteorology (macrometeorology, long-term forecasts, climatology), Senior Researcher, Russian State Hydrometeorological University, works with, as he writes, “Atmospheric Centers of Action (cyclons and anticyclones, such as Icelandic depression, the South Pacific subtropical anticyclone, etc.). Changes in key parameters of these centers strongly indicate that the global temperature is influenced by these natural factors (not exclusively but nevertheless)”, St. Petersburg, RussiaGösta Walin, Professor, i oceanografi, Earth Science Center, Göteborg University, Göteborg, SwedenHelen Warn, PhD (Meteorology, specialized in atmospheric fluid dynamics at McGill University), Vancouver, BC, CanadaAnthony Watts, ItWorks/IntelliWeather, Founder, surfacestations.org, Watts Up With That, Chico, California, U.S.A.Charles L. Wax, PhD (physical geography: climatology, LSU), State Climatologist – Mississippi, past President of the American Association of State Climatologists, Professor, Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, U.S.A.Forese-Carlo Wezel, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Stratigraphy (global and Mediterranean geology, mass biotic extinctions and paleoclimatology), University of Urbino, Urbino, ItalyBoris Winterhalter, PhD, senior marine researcher (retired), Geological Survey of Finland, former professor in marine geology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandDavid E. Wojick, PhD, PE, energy and environmental consultant, Technical Advisory Board member - Climate Science Coalition of America, Star Tannery, Virginia, U.S.A.Dr. Bob Zybach, PhD (Oregon State University (OSU), Environmental Sciences Program, EPA-sponsored peer-reviewed research on carbon sequestration in coniferous forests -- mostly in relation to climate history and quality of climate predictive models), MAIS (OSU, Forest Ecology, Cultural Anthropology, Historical Archaeology), BS (OSU College of Forestry), President, NW Maps Co., Program Manager, Oregon Websites and Watersheds Project, Inc., Cottage Grove, Oregon, U.S.A.American Association of State Climatologists” http://www.climatescienceinternational.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=289&Itemid=2American Geological InstituteAmerican Institute of Professional GeologistsGeological Sciences of the Polish Academy of SciencesJapan Society of Energy and Resources (1791 Members)Russian Academy of Scienceshttp://www.populartechnology.net/2007/10/no-consensus-on-global-warming.html