Evaluation Course Templates: Fill & Download for Free

Now that compilers have largely caught up to it, I like it.Prior to 2005 or so, give or take a couple years depending on the compiler, C++ was a dog. The Stepanov Abstraction benchmark used to show massive slowdowns for moderate levels of abstraction in many cases. Then, it seemed like everyone caught up, and compilers were peeling those abstractions back to nothing. Zero penalty.C++ suddenly became rather interesting to me.I dove in, started learning about iterators and standard containers, and so on. My programs straddled two worlds: Workstation and embedded.On the workstation side, I made an effort to use standard algorithms and standard containers, although I found iterators clunky and painful. I started to feel the joy of RAII.On the embedded side, I made good use of templates, type resolution, type checking, and inheritance (primarily for interfaces) to make my code tight. I leveraged as much compile time evaluation as I could get my hands on, while still keeping the code somewhat flexible where it needed to be.And then C++11 happened. It was a breath of fresh air.The combination of auto, smart pointers, and move semantics made the workstation side of my world so much better. I committed to “going native” on modern C++, and don’t regret it one bit.My embedded C++ code tended to feel a bit like “C with Colons,” as I saw someone put it here on Quora. I used some C++ facilities (esp. templates and the ‘enum trick’)* for compile time evaluation, and encapsulated some interfaces in classes. Mostly, though, it looked like C with some additional syntax.Prior to C++11, my workstation C++ didn’t look much better, although I did actually use std::vector, std::string, and std::map. I never took the jump to std::auto_ptr as it just seemed a bit weird. Iterating over a std::vector still felt a bit obnoxious, as did looking up values in a std::map. Spelling the iterator names correctly felt like a fools errand half the time. I had a crapload of “helper typedefs” to make it a bit less taxing.Once C++11 arrived, I sent myself back to school, and upped my game.I like it. I’m a convert.It’s not without its warts, but I can generally make it do what I want it to do, without terribly much effort.I can move surprising amounts of code evaluation to compile time. I can also generate fairly interesting tables and data structures at compile time, without resorting to external “generators” as I had in the past. Previously, I’d write some domain-specific code generator to do work for me, generating C or C++ code to compile. Now I can do much more of that within the language.Smart pointers have given me a decent framework for annotating the lifetime expectations of any given object within the language. I no longer need to say foo *obj; // owning pointer to remind myself which raw pointer owns the object.I feel auto made iterators quite livable. Friendly, even! And range-based for reduced the number of times I actually care about iterators.Do I have Stockholm Syndrome? *meh* I doubt it.I enjoy C++ in a way that parallels my enjoyment with C circa 1994. I’m at a different level now, ~25 years later.* The ‘enum trick’ I used was the precursor of constexpr. Provide a non-type template parameter to a class template. The class then declares an enum that captures the value. Something like this:template <int Expr> struct evaluate {  enum {  value = Expr  }; }; Then you could say evaluate<expression>::value and know you had a compile-time evaluated expression. Of course, you could get more complicated with recursive template instantiations terminated by template specialization… This is a simplified example.

I took The Wallstreet School’s Stock Market Course & I would be narrating my personal experience with this course so that you can take an informed decision.I am no one to say that it’s the best, but the way their course is structured is a testimony to their experienced Instructors, who include industry veterans with a decade long experience in Investment Banking and Valuations.They start the course by explaining basic concepts of finance to prepare you for the advance topics which would come as the course progresses. This might be useful for people who aren’t from finance background as they struggle to deal with Financial Statements.The instructor then moves on to the details of each indicator (Ratios, Shareholding patterns, Moats etc.) through which you can evaluate the fundamentals of the company, with abundant examples, case studies and exceptions – Everything being explained intuitively.You won’t find their teachings in any book. They use their own proprietary templates to analyse the company stocks through Excel. All their content is their own creation and unique to themselves, and a bit on the tougher side.After going through the course, now I have a fair understanding of what metrics to check in a company and where to find them before making the decision to invest in itSome improvement on their part can be done by keeping the course validity a little more, since the course isn’t easy enough.You can have a look at their sample videos before making a decision. Hope it helps!A little note - There are 100s of other free or low-priced courses about stock investing, made by newbies who themselves have never actually done valuations of any company and are teaching company’s fundamentals without sufficient experience. Kindly avoid them

Hi,I would suggest that you take a look at ProProfs NPS Software. This survey tool that is used by educators, instructors, online marketers and organizations to gather customer feedback, conduct market and demographic research, evaluate course efficacy, and much more.What makes ProProfs Survey Maker a preferred choice is its ability to derive insights from the customer survey data and interaction data to make the NPS more actionable. This easy-to-use, feature-rich and intuitive platform supports advanced features such as response grading, detailed survey stats, multiple question types, cross-device compatibility, survey embed facilities and more. you can create online surveys tailored to the needs of your respondents and get detailed reports that help you to accurately interpret the results.This online tool comes with a simple drag and drop survey creation interface that will let you easily edit and reorder survey questions. A lot of marketing professionals use the survey embed code provided by ProProfs Survey Maker to post the surveys to their blogs or websites.Check out this video to know how you can use ProProfs Survey Maker to create free online survey within minutes.ProProfs Survey Maker was built keeping in mind that customer feedback cannot be a onetime activity. It has to be solicited across the client’s lifetime journey with the brand to get a true understanding of her true disposition. While the conventional NPS measurement methods provide only a score and not much else. ProProfs Survey Maker allows businesses to map their entire customer journey from onboarding to exit. This tool is great for tracking NPS at an organizational level, but also keep a check on the progress and improvement of individual processes.What makes ProProfs Survey Maker the best online tool for measuring net promoter score-- Simple to use: It offers ready to use NPS templates for all kinds of NPS surveys- ComprehensiveIt is configurable with 100+ settings since it comes as part of an existing robust survey tool offering many question types and settings. The tool is built by ProProfs - a company specializing in survey & customer tools, that really understands the NPS space and how to record responses to ensure they are actionable.It allows advanced integration with other online platforms like MailChimp, Salesforce, ConstantContact etc.- Delightful: The NPS templates are aesthetically designed and are super easy to understand for the survey takers. This is how a customer satisfaction survey looks like.- 24/7 support team: The company follows a prompt approach to resolve any customer query by offering support service 365 days a year all round the clock.Some of the key defining features of ProProfs Survey Maker areManage multiple surveysTrack your NPS survey results with daily, weekly and monthly reportsGet insights on detractors, passives and promoters with graphs and charts.Create your own personalised, branded & professional surveySet survey cycle, dates and time delay on page for NPS surveySelect survey throttle dates for different respondents.Share NPS survey on multiple channels, as a pop-up or even print itGet survey feedback via link, email and social mediaEmbed your NPS survey on your webpage with a simple embed link.Zero Implementation TimePocket-friendly pricing plansI hope this answer helps.