Record Of Environmental Consideration - Fema: Fill & Download for Free

He has been doing this since he was elected.Trump is rolling back over 80 environmental regulations. Here are five big changes you might have missed in 2019 - Oil & Gas 360From electing people in the Oil industry to run the EPA. Like Rex Tillerson and Scott Pruitt.Rex Tillerson works for Exxon Mobile which is a company that has a long record of funding climate denial (which continued under Tillerson) and is under investigation for potentially defrauding investors by failing to tell them that it knew decades ago of the risks climate change posed to the bottom line. Tillerson has also overseen an expansion of Exxon's investment in developing Alberta's tar sands, some of the most carbon-heavy fuel in the world.Rex Tillerson Is Running the State Department Into the GroundScott Pruitt, not only racked up tons of ethics violations, he also racked up hundreds of thousands of dollars in first-class flights, a $43,000 soundproof office phone booth, and more than $1,500 in fountain pens. Thanks Tax Payers!EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt resignsScott Pruitt left the EPA mired in scandal. Now he is lobbying Indiana lawmakers.There are LITERALLY almost a 100 things that Trump has done… I can’t even begin to write an answer that can encompass the amount of stupidity and ignorance….Pulling out of the Paris Summit. Essentially handing leadership over to China.Trump Is Expected to Withdraw From the Paris Climate AgreementPresident Donald Trump has pulled the U.S. out of the Paris Climate AgreementDumping waste in streams.Did President Trump Make It Legal to Dump Coal Mining Waste Into Streams?Trump Removes Pollution Controls on Streams and Wetlandshttps://www.washingtonpost.com/videonational/president-trump-signs-resolution-to-permit-mining-waste-dumping-in-waterways/2017/02/21/cde426aa-f84b-11e6-aa1e-5f735ee31334_video.htmlOpening up pipelines and drilling everywhere.Trump has created a loophole to allow pipelines to avoid environmental reviewA New Trump Rule Would Fast-Track Oil Pipelines Without Consideration of Climate ChangeDonald Trump would allow Keystone XL pipeline and end Paris climate dealCutting down National Forests and turning them into Lumber.Trump’s Plan To Destroy Old-Growth Forests For Oil CompaniesTrump to lift logging restrictions in America's largest National Forest: A climate change threat '"like the fires burning in the Amazon," warns expertShrinking the size of National Parks and allowing drilling.Donald Trump slashes size of national parks in Utah to allow drillingWhat Trump’s Shrinking of National Monuments Actually MeansTrump Orders Largest National Monument Reduction In U.S. HistoryEssentially scrubbing the EPA website of any mention of Climate Change.Welcome to the new EPA website, overhauled by Trump’s teamTrump administration tells EPA to cut climate page from website: sourcesScott Pruitt Closely Monitored Scrubbing Of EPA Climate WebsitesDeleting research data.I am an Arctic researcher. Donald Trump is deleting my citations | Victoria Herrmannhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/12/13/scientists-are-frantically-copying-u-s-climate-data-fearing-it-might-vanish-under-trump/Trump White House Orders E.P.A. to Delete Climate-Change Web PageNot protecting endangered bumblebees.Why Trump Doesn't Seem To Give A Shit About Endangered Bees | HoneyColonyOpinion: Trump takes on the bumblebeeAllowing the killing of whales and dolphins in nets.Trump Gives Big Oil Green Light to Kill Whales, Dolphins, PeopleSign Petition: Trump's Seismic Blasting Plan Will Injure and Kill Thousands of Whales and DolphinsTrump administration cancels proposed limits on marine mammals and sea turtles trapped in fishing netsRepealing the law that would force automakers to give better gas mileage.Trump has rolled back yet another key part of Obama's legacyTrump EPA expected to roll back auto gas mileage standardsAllowing the pesticide that contains chlorpyrifos even though it causes brain damage in children and farm workers. Hope you enjoy drinking water that causes brain damage.Did Trump reverse an insecticide ban after getting $1M from the company that makes it?Trump EPA allows use of controversial pesticideTrump administration won't ban pesticide tied to childhood brain damageScott Pruitt thinks that carbon emissions have zero effect on the enviroment. Acid rain just happens by magic apparentlly.EPA head Scott Pruitt denies that carbon dioxide causes global warmingEPA chief Scott Pruitt says carbon dioxide is not a primary contributor to global warmingHe tried to repeal the Obama Methane law but fortunately we have some intelligent Republicans that actually knew better. Oh wait…guess I was wrong..did some research.Trump’s EPA Repeals An Obama Methane RuleTrump Administration Eases Regulation Of Methane Leaks On Public LandsBudget cuts to help protect our water and land so that we can buy more bombs and guns.Trump finalizes repeal of Obama-era clean water ruleNot caring about the Ozone and repealing laws that protect it, which if it wasn’t there we would lots of skin cancer. Laws that have been on the books since the 90’s.The Clean Air Act Under a Trump AdministrationRepealing laws that ensure that new buildings abide by certain flood standards. From 1993 to 2016, global average sea level has increased by about 3.25 inches and is projected to rise one to four feet by the end of the century. Higher sea-level rise cannot be ruled out, due to incomplete data on Antarctic ice-shelf stability. Since the 1960s, tidal flooding has increased at least fivefold in several U.S. cities. But you know what…we don’t need to protect people from floods. Hope your toddlers know how to swim, better pack some floaties.Trump To Repeal Obama-Era Flood Risk Building StandardsTrump's rollback of flood protections risks further Houston-style calamityTrump Rolls Back Obama-Era Flood Standards For Infrastructure ProjectsA study that was done on coal miners to help them get medical insurance and funding was disbanded. Sorry coal miners he only cares about you if you provide profit. It’s only business.23,000 Coal Miners Will Lose Their Health Insurance Under Trump - The Ring of Fire NetworkAccidental bird deaths are now legal because of Trump.Trump Administration Moves to Relax Rules Against Killing BirdsCensoring climate change web sites is now legal. I mean because who cares about freedom of speech.A new report has found the Trump's administration is quietly censoring climate change content on federal websitesTrump Admin Ordered ‘Climate Censorship’ in Plans to Lease Texas Public Lands for Fossil Fuel ExtractionHe loosened the regulations on toxic air pollution which essentially going to kill people. Hope you southerners like lung cancer. Because that is who it’s going to affect the most.He got rid of the climate disaster planning for FEMA which was drafted under the George W. Bush administration. So you know, hurricanes, yeah we don’t any plan to deal with those anymore. We are just going to wing it.Trump's FEMA Ignores Climate Change in Strategic Plan for Disaster ResponsePOLITICS: FEMA threat report ignores climate change, sea-level riseHe rolled back car emission standards, hope you like smog.Trump’s Rollback of Auto Pollution Rules Shows Signs of DisarrayThe science transparancy act, much of the data that would be excluded is based on reviews of personal health information, which is often not publicly available because of privacy laws or practical challenges. No more privacy for you. Thanks Trump.https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/12/13/how-trumps-war-science-is-borrowing-tobacco-industry-playbook/They cut funding to the Nasa Climate monitoring program. If you cannot measure emissions reductions, you cannot be confident that countries are adhering to reduction agreements. You can’t measure and predict climate change.'Shockingly Stupid': Trump to Eliminate NASA Climate ResearchTrump dismantles NASA climate change programTrump’s Plan to Eliminate NASA Climate Research Is Ill-Informed and DangerousHe rolled back proctections for endangered species, guess we won’t be needing those once they go extinct.Trump rolls back endangered species protectionsThe Trump administration wants to roll back the Endangered Species Act. These 10 animals might not be here today without it.Juliana vs. United States alleges that the government has failed to protect Earth from the effects of climate change, putting the lives of future generations at risk and violating their basic constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property. Guess who the defendant is…THE TRUMP AND OBAMA ADMINISTRATIONS.He nullified Federal laws on coal power plants. Clean water and air? We don’t need those.Trump's EPA rolls back Obama-era coal ash regulationsI think…that some very stupid people has killed us. That some very stupid people have killed our children. And yet…there are some who choose to continue to remain ignorant, and continue to remain loyal to ignorant party politics.We have failed as human beings. Trump is a domesitc terrorist. The republican party are worse than terrorists.

They have faithfully taken all their scheduled breaks faithfully and on time.They suspended Trey Gowdy’s inquiry into Benghazi.The Majority leadership showed up for a photo op when POTUS announce his deal with the Minority leadership to kick the debt ceiling debate down the road 3 months so everyone could focus on disaster response.They haven’t cut FEMAs budget. Yet.They’ve put on a pretty convincing demonstration of what being scared shitless of North Korea might look like in a political party dominated by people who think like Steve Bannon and are eternally surprised to discover that blowing up the federal government may not be the best use of their time. Knowing that this neo-con, crypto-Nazi, neo-Confederate party of second and 3rd generation Cheney Chicken Hawks have finally connected the dots between Grover Norquist and the vision on the last two pages of Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged is considerable comfort to me, personally. If, in fact, they will make the connection between the natural disasters of hurricanes and the man-made disaster of war, and become WOKE as to the folly of their ideological conceits, it is not too late for some of them keeping their jobs after Indivisible eviserates the House Freedom Caucus at the polls at mid-terms if they realize the deal Trump cut with the Democrats is their only hope of a federal paycheck as a sitting federal elected politician in 2019.Indivisible will trot out Rep. James Sensenbrenner as the Poster Boy for a future for spending a lot more time with his familey with his 93% voting record with Reaganomics. Reaganomics is the enemy and Bernie Sanders’ progressive federalism is a superior, and proven, operating model that a progressive Democrat majority can adopt with or without Trump’s signiture with veto-proof legislation, which Trump is counting on. Trump doesn’t want to work and he has begun to learn that the Democrats understand perfectly the art of the deal while the crypto-Nazi wing of the GOP can’t repeal Obamacare with a 7 year head start. I mean, it only took God 6 days with a round of golf on the 7th.Where was I?Oh, yes, Rep. James Sensenbrenner. If your voting record resembles dating from before Reagan, you are in Indivisible’s cross-hairs. His 93% Conservative voting record traces the influence of the Sharon Statement, which is the founding manifesto of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s Young Americans for Freedom, which was conceived, and remains, a farm system for developing career activists in the white sociologically clustered corporate careerist to advance his crypto-Nazi world view, which isn’t significantly different from what Steve Bannon presented on 60 Minutes. James Sensenbrenner and Steve Bannon are crypto-Nazi fellow travelers, along with Newt Gingrich and Mike Pence’s Creationist Constituency (which has a nearly universal over-lap with Betsy DeVos’s AmWay down-lines). And his voting record, Sensenbrenner’s, is a portrait of systematic economic sabotage right out of Trotsky’s insurgency processes and Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged.But, on a purely practical political basis, a vote for James Sensenbrenner as a proxy for any white male with an (R) after his name is a vote for Grover Norquist. And Grover Norquist is dedicated to “starving the beast” of the federal government by using the FEMA budget to finance tax subsidies for the Koch brothers and “Neutron Jack” Welch until it, the federal government, is small enough to drown in a bath tub.Or Houston.Both space shuttle disasters occurred while crypto-Nazis like James Sensenbrenner controlled NASA’s budget with the “doing more with less” legislative philosophy of Reaganomics. James Sensenbrenner was on the NASA budget committee when the Challenger blew up and it turns out the lack of investment in E-ring destruction testing was a cost avoidance decision required to finance tax breaks.So, if you voted with James Sensenbrenner 93% of the time, the (R) after your name is Resistance-speak for “Target”.As a trend, Rep. Jason Chaffee’s resignation from his House seat is possibly the most constructive thing the House Freedom Caucus and James Sensenbrenner would be to announce you are not running and giving back the reins of the GOP to its traditional adult leadership coalition: Eisenhower Republicans.RESIST at the polls. Indivisible.

This answer may contain sensitive images. Click on an image to unblur it.This is not a conspiracy theory. The observations at the World Trade Center during 09/11/01 support the conclusion that WTC-1,2,7 (the two towers and Building 7) were taken down with some form of energetic material (ie. explosive and incendiary) placed in the buildings well before 9/11. Furthermore, the evidence is clear the Murrah office building in Oklahoma City was destroyed April 19, 1995 by explosives planted within the building. Who may be responsible for these acts and what were their motives are separate matters. Therefore, I leave these considerations to the conspiracy theorists.WORLD TRADE CENTER (Building 7)Building 7 absolutely, unequivocally, and without controversy fell symmetrically at free fall acceleration for more than two seconds.This graph was taken from page 46 of the NIST (National Institute for Standards and Technology) Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (REPORT). It describes the descent of the north face of the building at free fall for approximately 2.25 seconds as measured at a point on the roof line.Many who defend the official story for 9/11 have difficulty acknowledging Building 7 descended at free fall acceleration. All arguments I've seen presented to counter this conclusion take the following form: NIST claims the north face roofline of Building 7 descended at free fall. They did not claim Building 7 descended at free fall. Therefore, Building 7 did not descend at free fall.However, the observations show with perfect clarity that Building 7 did in fact descend at free fall:The video shows the entire roofline of Building 7 remained horizontal during the first couple seconds of the descent. Furthermore, it is clear the interior of the building participated in the descent. Therefore, if a point on the north face roofline of Building 7 descended at free fall acceleration for approximately 2.25 seconds as described in the previous graph produced by NIST, then the entire building descended at free fall acceleration for approximately 2.25 seconds.The observed free fall acceleration of Building 7 REQUIRED the entire building support structure in the lower part of the building to be severed or otherwise destroyed within a small fraction of a second. This implies the use of some form of explosives - SEE (*)NOTE BELOW. Now, some of this support structure could have been destroyed well before the building fell. However, the observed free fall required the last of the support structure holding up the building to lose all its strength within a small fraction of a second.CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING:Many hours before Building 7 fell, Barry Jennings and a second person (Hess) independently claimed an explosion took place below them in Building 7 as they descended a stairwell near the 8th floor. They claimed the explosion trapped them at the 8th floor (thereby implying the explosion destroyed the stairwell below them). Both their accounts are available in the following videos. NOTE: Jennings later clarified the explosion caused the 6th floor landing of the stairwell to collapse.Measurements show Building 7 descended at free fall acceleration for approximately 2.25 seconds (see previous information). This corresponds to approximately 81 feet (Free Fall Calculator).The ONLY way for Building 7 to achieve the observed free fall descent over the observed distance is for ALL obstructions to be removed in the lower part of the building over a contiguous vertical distance of approximately 81 feet. This necessarily includes stairwells.Building 7 is 47 stories. NIST provides the following information in their Building 7 Report: The height to the roof line is 925 feet. The height to the 29th floor is 683 feet. Therefore, each floor is approximately (925–683)/18 = 13.4 feet. Hence, a vertical distance of 81 feet corresponds to 6 floors.In other words, the location of the explosion described by Jennings and Hess corresponded precisely in height to the building's actual free fall descent that occurred hours later.JENNINGS ACCOUNT (and interview conducted later)HESS ACCOUNTHESS TRAPPED IN BLDG 7 AT THE 8TH FLOOR AS HE DESCRIBED(*)NOTE: The use of explosives of some form is the only credible scenario to account for the observed sudden symmetrical free fall of Building 7. For this reason, the NIST Report on Building 7 was unable to explain this observation. As a result, key elements of the Report are unambiguously fraudulent (see the later section “ON THE NIST REPORTS”).*** RECENTLY COMPLETED STUDY AT UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS FALSIFIES THE NIST CONCLUSION ***World Trade Center (The Twin Towers)The Twin Towers fell with constant acceleration (i.e. without deceleration events) thereby indicating the underlying support structure was destroyed by forces NOT derived from the momentum of the falling building mass.Furthermore, large volumes of a brilliant yellow incandescent molten metal was recorded on video pouring out of a tower minutes before it came down. A brilliant yellow incandescent molten metal also was observed and reported by many during the clean up operations (most often described as “molten steel” - see Witnesses of Molten Metal at Ground Zero). I note also the fires persisted at the World Trade Center for more than three months despite multiple rain events and firefighting efforts that included the use of chemical fire suppressants.The color of the molten metal observed at the World Trade Center implies a temperature beyond what can be achieved in an open air fire fueled by office furnishings or jet fuel (i.e. kerosene) - even under IDEAL conditions. However, the thick smoke observed indicated the actual temperature was far too low (relatively cool smoke carries heat away from the interior of the fire and reduces the peak temperature dramatically - we know the smoke was cool because it did not combust when it mixed with air). Furthermore, transferring heat to a material requires a heat source at a HIGHER temperature. In other words, the evidence (i.e. the observations) indicates the source of the heat energy used to produce the brilliant yellow incandescent molten metal cannot have been the office fires. Apparently, the engineers at NIST agreed. In their Report, they speculated the metal seen to pour from WTC-2 was molten aluminum. However, they know molten aluminum cannot be contained under these conditions for the superheating required to show the observed color temperature (aluminum melts at only about 1200F). Furthermore, the engineers know that even superheated molten aluminum appears silvery in daylight conditions. Finally, even IF somehow contained and superheated to this temperature within the building, then molten aluminum must lose heat to the surroundings when flowing away from the heat source and to the edge of the building and while falling hundreds of feet through cool air. Therefore, the engineers at NIST made an unprecedented speculation (without offering a mechanism or conducting an experiment) that there was some kind of organic material somehow mixed within the molten aluminum that somehow off gassed burning vapors in some way to cause the observed uniform brilliant yellow incandescence. Yes - they really did this! This explanation, like many others offered by NIST, is persuasive only to those committed to the official narrative and who fail to examine the actual observations. The video shows with perfect clarity the large volumes of molten metal pouring from WTC-2 minutes before its “collapse” is a uniform brilliant yellow color due to incandescence (indeed, it looks EXACTLY like molten iron!). Furthermore, its appearance corresponds precisely with the molten metal described as “molten steel” by many working at the World Trade Center during the months after 9/11 (molten steel is iron based, and hence shows a brilliant yellow incandescence).See the following video for more discussion about the observations of molten metal and associated high temperatures at the World Trade Center:There are a great deal more observations that contradict the official story. For example, the evidence clearly shows the cores of the towers failed first and NOT the floor trusses (as is often cited by proponents of the official story).The antenna spire on WTC-1 is observed to fall before the roof line thereby indicating initial failure of the core in that case. Furthermore, additional observations on WTC-2 confirm the core failed first. See VIDEO. This happens to be the same corner from which large volumes of a brilliant yellow incandescent molten metal was pouring just minutes before the observed failure.The following is obvious when pointed out (SEE VIDEO). The core was severed FIRST thereby allowing the upper section of the building to move down and laterally off the lower section (the upper section is seen to move away from the camera). The perimeter columns depicted in the video were still attached to the core via the floor trusses. Therefore, as the upper section of the core moved off the lower section, it pulled on these perimeter columns causing them to bow inward and fail catastrophically. This began shortly after the corner steel member was sufficiently weakened. THIS IS WHY THE “COLLAPSE” BEGAN WITH THE UPPER SECTION OF THE BUILDING TILTING OVER:The upper section of the building would have slid off the lower section (tilting over in the process) - that is had the explosives not been detonated shortly afterward. See WTC-2 in this next video starting at 6:50. I draw your attention to the left face of the building. It is perfectly clear that the left face of the upper section of the building moves away from the left face of the lower section of the building. Yet, it also is perfectly clear the perimeter columns that make up the left face of the lower section of the building begin to be destroyed at precisely the same time as the perimeter columns on the opposite side of the building into which the upper section of the building moves! It is perfectly clear the upper section of the building cannot be destroying these perimeter columns on the lower left face of the building! After all, it is moving away from these columns! Yet, ALL the perimeter columns around the lower part of the building are destroyed at the same time! In other words, an obviously asymmetrical collapse of the upper section is shown to produce a perfectly symmetrical destruction of the lower section! This is a contradiction. Contradictions do not exist! The official explanation is clearly falsified by these and many other observations. There are countless such contradictions easily discerned by those willing to examine the observations objectively.(FOR ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION, GOOGLE “Europhysics News 15 years later: on the physics of high-rise building collapses” - 15 years later: on the physics of high-rise building collapses).DIRECT EVIDENCE FOR ENERGETIC MATERIALSA sophisticated energetic material based on the thermite reaction was discovered in multiple dust samples taken from the World Trade Center and described here: https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdfHigh explosives based on the thermite reaction began development at least as early as the mid 1990's. See article on page 19 for a discussion of this technology.The thermite reaction accounts for many observations including the brilliant yellow incandescent molten metal observed on video and described by many who worked at the site during the following months (molten iron is a product of the thermite reaction). It explains how samples of dust from the World Trade Center contained more than 5% iron by mass in the form of tiny iron rich spheres (see 2003 study by RJ Lee Group here: http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/cache/nyenvirolaw_WTCDustSignatureCompositionAndMorphology.pdf ). It explains the eroded, partially evaporated, and sulfidated samples of structural steel from both Building 7 and one of the towers as described in a 2002 FEMA study: https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1512-20490-8452/403_apc.pdf. It also explains the high temperature fires that persisted for months at the World Trade Center (again, despite multiple rain events and firefighting efforts that included the use of chemical fire suppressants - see “Environmental Anomalies at the World Trade Center” at the end of this paragraph). Some have argued thermite cannot have been the source of what so many described as “molten steel” at the WTC because they argue all thermite would have reacted early and any molten iron cooled. However, this conclusion is not based in reality. First, there is no reason to conclude all thermite must have reacted initially. More important, unreacted thermite that remained deep in the rubble and exposed to very high temperatures could establish an equilibrium condition causing it to react at a faster rate as the temperature dropped and at a slower rate as the temperature climbed. In this way, the high temperatures (including brilliant yellow incandescent molten iron described by so many witnesses as “molten steel”) would persist in pockets deep in the rubble until shortly after these concentrated hot spots became uncovered allowing heat (and many associated reaction products) to rapidly dissipate to ambient (see Le Chatelier's principle - Wikipedia and Environmental Anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials).Accepting the official story for 9/11 in light of the information presented thus far is possible only with faith normally attributed to religious zealots. That noted, let us continue…ON THE NIST REPORTSKey elements of the Report on Building 7 released by NIST are unambiguously fraudulent. Their separate Report on the towers restricted consideration to the “onset of collapse”. So, with respect to the towers, NIST ignored many observations that have material implications. With respect to building 7, NIST chose to engage in outright fraud to avoid having to contend with the implications:PART 1(PART 2 is particularly interesting. There is not the slightest attempt to conceal the fraud)PART 2PART 3PENTAGONMany conspiracy theorists showed a lack of rigor and overactive imaginations here. The evidence is clear the Pentagon was hit by a large plane. There is no credible evidence to the contrary and too many observations support the conclusion.New Video: Seeing the Pentagon PlaneThis is why so little material could be readily identified as part of a plane:OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBINGMany do not know the clear evidence for explosives detonated inside the Murrah building. You may be shocked to learn the credentials of the man who first brought the evidence to light:Red Flags From an ExpertPartin ReportEGLIN BLAST EFFECTS STUDYLINKS TO LIVE NEWS BROADCASTS (and other evidence) THAT REPORTED ADDITIONAL BOMBS DISCOVERED INSIDE THE MURRAH BUILDING THAT DAY:LINK 1LINK 2LINK 3WHY SO MANY ACCEPT THE OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORIES FOR 9/11 AND THE OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBINGThose who defend the official conspiracy theories for 9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombing are guilty of at least two egregious fallacies: (1) they maintain willful ignorance by disregarding the observations not consistent with their theory, (2) they operate on faith in authority (never questioning the proclamations from official sources). In effect, they PUT THE CART BEFORE THE HORSE by starting with their conclusion.Also, many who question the official stories for these events also postulate fantastic hypotheses such as holographic planes at the World Trade Center, tactical nuclear devices planted in the towers, a missile struck the Pentagon (no plane), energy beams destroyed the WTC buildings (yes, really! - see Judy Wood), and wild speculations on culpability. The well is poisoned. Most do not have the time, inclination, and/or ability to parse the many claims and consider objectively the available evidence. Hence, they default to the officially sanctioned conspiracy theory despite its own set of absurdities.“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” - Voltaire