Presentation Pdf - California Student Aid Commission: Fill & Download for Free

Israel did 9/11Was Jesus a Jew, YHWH's Flat Earth, The History of Communism, The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution, The Holocaust Exposed, The 6 Million Myth, Old Almanacs Expose the Jewish Holocaust lie, H.Res. 707, The Expulsion of the Jews Throughout History, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, The Babylonian Talmud, Christian Pastor Files Criminal Charges against School Board for Jewry, East Penn School is violating the law, East Pennsboro Middle School Holocaust Indoctrination Protest, The Spanish Inquisition is a Myth, Up to 20 years for Palestinians Who Throw Rocks at Jews in Tanks, Bruce Jenner the Fruit Loop, The Truth about Saddam and Gaddafi, Graphics, Prophet Mohammed ordered Muslims to Protect Christians until Christ Returns, Mohammed Was a White Man, I Am the Sovereign Man, About Us, ContactISLAM WAS FRAMED by Zionist Jews in theUnited States Government and in Fake Israel!Welcome to FBI.gov releases proof that a missile was used to hit the pentagon on 911.Pastor Ernest717-461-2512Messiah appeared to me, that's why I'm not afraid to tell the truth. Israel did 911 Remembrance, at the PA capital building."ISIS" is not Islam. It is Israel! Wake up, israel did 911!​A must watch videoEven Jews admit that Israel did 9-11​and antiZionist jews are furious!Pastor Ernest proves no real planes were used on 911, they were CGI AnimationsWe were former American atheists who hated Christianity and Islam, that is, until we learned why ATHEIST JEWS OF Israel did 9/11!Israel murders an American.Rachel Corrie was a child of Yahweh, a prophet among men. The Rachel Corrie Foundation for Peace and JusticeThe world is awakening to Zionist Jewry!The Experts weigh in, "explosives were used on 9/11" by Zionist jews! Over 2,500 engineers agree, explosives were used to demolish towers 1,2,5,6,7!Let's get right to the point, it was the Canaanite Jews who did 9/11 not the Arabs (Muslims).The Israeli Secret Intelligence Service is "ISIS," an acronym of the goddess ISIS. ISIS is the Mossad who did 9/11. Let us not forget, it was also the Mossad attacked the USS Liberty and committed the Levan Affair. The Mossad murdered JFK and JFK's son. The Mossad is the greatest enemy of Sac's son to have ever lived. The information I will present, cannot be debunked. I will address several points that will clearly show that it was Fake Israel, Benjamin Satanyahu aka Netenyahu that attacked the United States of America on 9/11. It was not the first planned attack against America by Jewry, there have been several. There will be several more if we don't restrain the lawless one, the Juden. It can no longer be debated, it was the False State of Israel who planned an attack against our country on June 8, 1967, killing 34 men and wounding 174 Navy soldiers. The absolute proof that it was a purposeful attack can be seen in the video below.​ I must warn you, it is graphic and heart-wrenching one hour video.9/11 is Jewry's biggest cover-up in​ the history of the world!6 of the 10 commissioners of the 9/11 Commission, openly admit, the Government has covered up the investigation of 9/11. An unprecedented high military ranked officers have been purged for speaking out and asking for a serious investigation.The astounding amount of structural and architectural engineers who deny the "Official 9/11 Jewry Report" is overwhelming. That "2 airplanes caused the collapse of five buildings at free fall speed, on the same day, into their own footprint" is unfounded, impossible, and a mockery to those firefighters who were killed on purpose by the Zionist Jews directly. Never in the history of the modern aviation or modern structural engineering, has a high-rise building collapsed from a single airplane strike.It is time to "Come Out of the 9/11 Closet" over 2,200 Engineers and Architects, countless professors and intellectuals, business owners and pastors support a real investigation of 9/11. We have officially debunked the "9/11 Official Jewry Report." That's enough to wake any rational minded human up. Literally, the finest structural engineers, demolition specialists (front loaders and packers) who are alive, have completely debunked the "Official Jewry Report." 9/11 is just another episode of "The Jews and Their Lies."9/11 was the most successful, preplanned Mossad attack in the history of the world.It was my understanding of 911, who was responsible for the attack, why the USA is at war with Islamic countries that caused my awakening to Jewish Supremacy andTalmudic atheistic Zionism.​I personally walked with, lived among and was employed by the jews.I was a jew until YHWH set me free.Scientists Confirm, Explosives Used toDemolish Towers on 9/11...Physics Journal Publishes Hard Peer-reviewed Evidence of "WTC Explosives..."Twenty-five Military Officers Call Official 9/11 story "Impossible", "Ludicrous","A well-organized cover-up", "investigate 911 now..."The Majority of 9/11 Commissioners now agree that the "Government Lied..."​2,500 Architects & Engineers "calling for a Grand Jury investigation of NIST officials"...Alright, let's prove the Official 911 Jewry report is complete nonsense.Nano Thermite was found in the dust at Ground Zero. ​Peer reviewed inthe Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal. ‘Niels Harrit’, ‘Thermite Bentham’, “The great Nano Thermate debate” Jon Cole, ‘Iron rich spheres’ Steven Jones, ‘Limited Metallurgical Examination (FEMA C-13, Appendix C-6)’. ‘Nano Tubes’Nothing is more important to this country than loosening Israel's stranglehold over the USA! Solve 911 and we will end the Jewish owned FEDERAL RESERVE! Your Zionist pastor is a liar for mammon's sake. ​Islam was framed!2,500+ Engineers and Architects the number is currently growing. It is time to support a real independent 9/11 investigation. yRichard Gage, Founder.‘Explosive Evidence’, ‘Blueprint for Truth’, ‘AE911′, ‘Toronto Hearings’, ‘Kevin Ryan’.3)The total collapse of WTC 7 in 6.5 seconds at free fall acceleration (NIST admits 2.25 seconds) proves explosives were used to demolish WTC7.Larry Silverstein used the term “Pull it". Steel framed high rise buildings have NEVER totally collapsed from fire or structural damage. Building 7 was not hit by a plane.​building 7 was demolished with explosives.4)Dick Cheney was in command of NORAD on 9/11 while running war games.‘Stand down order’.​“Of course, the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary?”​Norman Minetta testimony.“Gave order to shoot down Flight 93.”, ‘NORAD Drills’.Absolute proof building 7 was detonated with explosives.5) 6 out of the 10 Commissioners believe that the 9/11 Commission report was “Setup to fail”Co-Chairs Hamilton and Kean, “It was a 30-year conspiracy”,​“The Whitehouse has played cover-up”, ‘Max Cleland resigned’, ‘John Farmer’.75 professors and leading scientists​ deny the official 911 government lie.911 Commissioners and high-level authorities do not believe the official '911 Jewry report.'The former director of the FBI says there was a cover-up by the 9/11 Commission.And the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials lied to the Commission, and considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements, yet didn't bother to tell the American people (free subscription required). Indeed, the co-chairs of the Commission now admit that the Commission largely operated based upon political considerations. 9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says "I don't believe for a minute we got everything right", that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report was only "the first draft" of history. 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that "There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn't have access . . . ." 9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said "We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting" Former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: "It is a national scandal"; "This investigation is now compromised"; and "One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up". The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission, who led the 9/11 staff's inquiry, said "I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described .... The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.... This is not true."Mossad used a missile to destroy the pentagon6) FBI confiscated 84/85 Videos from the Pentagon. ‘Moussaoui trial’ revealed these videos.​Released Pentagon Security Camera (FOIA) does not show a 757 and is clearly Missing a frame. ‘Sheraton Hotel’, “Double tree’, ‘Citgo”.​However, Welcome to FBI.gov released video clearly showing a missile hitting the Pentagon.Tim Roemer accidentally slips and says a "missile hit the pentagon" but covers his mistake up.​Democracy Now on 911 Coverup​7) Osama Bin Laden was NOT wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks. “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.” CIA created, trained and funded “Al Qaeda/Taliban” during the Mujahideen. Osama was a CIA asset named ‘Tim Osman’. OBL Reported dead in Dec 2001 (FOX).Osama Bin Laden died in 2001No proof linking Ben Laden to 9/11, FBI ReportWhen asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, [Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI] said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”Communist President Obongo lies to the public saying his administration killed Bin Laden and that is a flat out lie.Prime Minister of Pakistan, "Osama Bin Laden dead since 2001""We haven't heard from him (Usama Bin Laden) in a long time," Bush told reporters at the White House. "I truly am not that concerned about him." March 14, 2002Click this button to watch Bush make this statement. Wait, Usama just attacked the US on 911, but you're not concerned about him only 6 months after?Bush's comment about Usama is absolute proof that he had nothing to do with 911! Zionist Jews did 911, not Muslims.8)100’s of Firefighters and witness testimony to BOMBS/EXPLOSIONS​ignored by the 9/11 Commission Report.9/11 Commission Report bars 503 1st responder eyewitnesses. “Explosions in the lobby and sub levels”, ‘Firefighter explosions’, ‘Barry Jennings’, ‘William Rodriguez’.Come Out of the Closet! Firefighters admit explosives were used on 911.​ Buildings have never collapsed into their own footprint in the history of modern engineering due to fires. Explosives were used by the Mossad. ​Firefighters For 9-11 and others prove the "Official Jewry Report" is a lie.Retired Fire Marshall Rudy Dent exposes the Jews on 9/11. It was a "False Flag" attack. Office fires do not collapse highrise buildings.9) 100’s of firefighters and witness testimony to MOLTEN METAL ignored by the Commission report.​“Like you’re in a foundry”, “NIST’s John Gross denies the existence of Molten Metal”, ‘Swiss Cheese’,​“As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running.​” Leslie Robertson’.Ashkenazi Jew, Presedent G.W. Bush admits explosives were used on 9/11!Molten Steel, fast forward to 23:2010) ‘5 Dancing Israeli’s’ arrested in ‘Mossad Truck Bombs’ on 9/11 that showed “We were there to document the event.”​‘Urban Moving Systems’ front company, ‘Dominic Suter’. “$498,750 Business loan (June 2001)”. “Officer DeCarlo’, ‘Art Students’, ‘Israeli Spying’Dancing Israelis busted on 911, Michael Chertoff is a child of thefounder of the Mossad, commits treason against the​United States of America by letting the dancing Edomite Israelis go.This cop busted the Mossad agents with explosives in their van on 911.​ Michael Chertoff, Ashkenazi Jew, let the Jew traitors go back to Israel!Dan Rather announces the arrest of Mossad agents in vans with explosives.11) On September 10th, 2001, Rumsfeld reported $2.3 TRILLION missing from the Pentagon. ‘Dov Zakheim’ Pentagon Comptroller. Former VP of ‘Systems Planning Corporation’ (Flight Termination System). Download the full speech in a PDF.Police scanner announces vans with 9/11 murals painted on the van driving through NYC.At 8 Minutes Ken O'keef exposes Israel.Donald Rumsfeld, $2.3 Trillion missing on 9/10/2001.​12) 220+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials question the official story.‘9/11 Whistleblowers’, ‘Patriots for 9/11′. ‘Robert Bowman’, ‘Sibel Edmonds’, ‘Albert Stubblebine’, ‘Wesley Clark’, ‘Mark Dayton’, ‘Alan Sabrosky’, ‘Cyntha McKinney’, ‘Kurt Sonnenfeld’. “patriots queen 9/11."The Experts Speak Outabout 9/11. "Explosives were used." The experts are on our side, not the official 911 Jewry report.All the evidence in the world, explosiveswere used to demolish the buildings on 9/11.9/11 Was A Controlled Demolition.​ Nevada Governor 2014 David Lory VanDerBeek w/ Richard Gage​13) Towers were built to withstand a Boeing jet(s). “I designed it for a 707 to hit it”, Leslie Robertson, WTC structural engineer.​“Could probably sustain multiple impacts of jetliners”, “like a pencil puncturing screen netting”​Frank De Martini, deceased Manager of WTC Construction & Project Management. “As far as a plane knocking a building over, that would not happen.” Charlie Thornton, Structural Engineer.14) History of American False Flag attacks. ​​‘USS Liberty’, ‘Gulf of Tonkin’, ‘Operation Northwoods’, ‘OKC Bombing (Murrah Building)’, ‘1993 WTC attacks’. ‘Patrick Clawson’. Project for the New American Century (PNAC) needed “a New Pearl Harbor”, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”. 9/11 Achieved those goals.​I know of no other video that exposes Israel's False Flag attacks than "911 Missing Links." This is a powerful video exposing the history of the Jews against America.15) BBC correspondent Jane Standley reported the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed. this proves the media had advanced knowledge of wtc7 collapse and failed to alert 1st responders.​(Soloman Brothers building) 20 minutes before it happened. CNN/FOX/MSNBC also had early reports. ‘BBC WTC 7′, ‘Jane Standley’, Ashleigh Banfield’. BBC was sued in court exposing their prior knowledge of WTC 7 collapsing.Alan Sabrosky, Israel did 9/11!16) “Flight 93″ NO PLANE CRASHED IN SHANKSVILLE, PA.​‘The Mayor of Shanksville reported that "there was no plane that crashed.""No wreckage,no bodies andno noise.""This crash was different. There was no wreckage, no bodies, and no noise."- Somerset County Coroner Wallace Miller​"I was looking for anything that said tail, wing, plane, metal. There was nothing." - Photographer Scott Spangler "I was amazed because it did not, in any way, shape, or form, look like a plane crash." - Patrick Madigan, commander of the Somerset barracks of the Pennsylvania State Police.​​​17) Bush hesitated for 441 days before starting the 911 Commission.‘Jersey Girls’. ‘Phil Zelikow’ already wrote the outline before the commission began. Steel shipped over seas. Obstruction of justice. JFK and Pearl Harbor commissions were started within 7 days.911 Steel/evidence shipped to China,​ this is treason!World Trade Center Steel purchased by China, Chicago Tribune: Chicago breaking news, sports, business, entertainment, weather and traffic - Chicago TribuneShanghai boasteel purchases 911 steelBaosteel Will Recycle World Trade Center DebrisA shipment of scrap steel from New York's collapsed World Trade Center will arrive in Shanghai tomorrow, according to media reports. The steel was bought by Shanghai Baosteel Group Corp. and several other domestic mills, which are always eager to buy scrap metal.Baosteel Group, the nation's largest steel firm, has purchased 50,000 tons of the scrap steel from "Ground Zero," the ruins of the September 11 terrorist attack, at no more than US$120 each ton, according to yesterday's Beijing Youth Daily.Most of the scrap will be recycled into ingots, but part of the relics will be molded into WTC souvenirs, the paper said.Baosteel officials reached by Shanghai Daily, however, denied they will make keepsakes out of the debris, but declined to give more details of their plans, saying only that the scrap will be melted down and reprocessed into new steel products.Another shipment of 10,000 tons of scrap from the WTC arrived in India earlier this month, reported Shanghai Morning Post. The metal will be melted down and recycled into kitchenware and other household items, the paper said.India bought its lot at US$120 per ton from the New Jersey scrap processor Metal Management, which purchased 40,000 tons of the debris at an auction held by the New York City government. Dealers estimated that the WTC disaster created more than 300,000 tons of scrap metal.China, the world's largeststeel-maker in terms of output, relies heavily on imports of scrap for its steel production. It imported 5.1 million tons of scrap in 2000.The scrap steel can be melted down into ingots, reprocessed and sold to other industries."All in all, China's purchase from the WTC ruins counts for little to its steel industry, given the nation's big consumption of scrap each year," said Qu Li, an analyst with China Securities. "But the price of US$120 per ton is, if not great, quite reasonable," she added.The average price paid by local mills last year for scrap steel was 1,250 yuan (US$150.6) a ton.New York authorities' decision to ship the twin towers' scrap to recyclers has raised the anger of victims' families and some engineers who believe the massive girders should be further examined to help determine how the towers collapsed.But New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg insisted there are better ways to study the tragedy of September 11.​"If you want to take a look at the construction methods and the design, that's in this day and age what computers do," said Bloomberg, a former engineering major. "Just looking at a piece of metal generally doesn't tell you anything." (东方网 January 24, 2002)18) The 911 commission was given extremely limited funds.$15 million was given to investigate 9/11. (Over $60 Million was spent investigating Clintons’ affairs with Monica).The Bush Family are Ashkenazi Jews by race.19) Bush said he watched the first plane crash into the North tower on TV before entering the classroom. that's impossible. “The TV was obviously on.” Was informed about the second impact while reading ‘My Pet Goat’ to the children. Remained for at least 8 more minutes while America was under “attack”.20) President Bush admitted that Iraq had​"absolutely no WMD's."Saddam was not a part or threat to the USA on 911. So why are our troops there in Afghanistan destroying their way of life? It all boils down to the Jews and their lies. War, War, War and war is money for bankers. The atheist Ashkenazi Jews destroyed Sadaam's interest-free banking system. Saddam wanted to break from the petrodollar and created his own Dinar. For this, the Jews killed him as they later did General Khadaffi. The Jews also killed the 2nd candlestick of Revelation, JFK.Saddam Hussein vowed to aid in ending poverty in the USA by a continual flow of money to be controlled by the Iraqi government paid directly to citizens.​$94 Million dollars was given to 36.1 million Americans in January of 2001. Bush killed Saddam to stop the world from knowing this fact.The people of Iraq received free college, healthcare, graduate school, interest-free loans, homes....Long before the Jews of the USA killed this great man, Saddam broke away from the Jew owned Federal Reserve interest racket. It is illegal for Muslims to charge interest with loans. The war was nothing more than the USA's attempt to destroy his interest free bank system and to overthrow the democracy of Iraq.The Great General Gaddafi explains why Saddam was hung by the Zionist Jews.This is why the Jews killed Gaddafi and Saddam.​21) The PATRIOT ACT was written before 9/11 &Signed into law October 26th, 2001.Patriot Act was written before 911.The Patriot Act was written many years before 9/11 "Washington Post."Clinton's Senate Bill S. 390 & H.R. 896Joe Biden Drafted the Core of the Patriot Act in 1995 …​ Before the Oklahoma City BombingPosted on December10, 2011 by Washington's Blog. The Core of the Patriot Act Was Drafted in 1995 … By Joe Biden. Everyone knows that the Patriot Act was drafted before 9/11.But few know that it was Joe Biden who drafted the core provisions which were included in that bill … in 1995.CNET reported in 2008:Months before the Oklahoma City bombing took place, Biden introduced another bill called the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995. It previewed the 2001 Patriot Act by allowing secret evidence to be used in prosecutions, expanding the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and wiretap laws, creating a new federal crime of “terrorism” that could be invoked based on political beliefs, permitting the U.S. military to be used in civilian law enforcement, and allowing permanent detention of non-U.S. citizens without judicial review.* The Center for National Security Studies said the bill would erode “constitutional and statutory due process protections” and would “authorize the Justice Department to pick and choose crimes to investigate and prosecute based on political belief sand Associations.”Biden himself draws parallels between his 1995 bill and its 2001 cousin. “I drafted a terrorism bill after the Oklahoma City bombing. And the bill John Ashcroft sent up was my bill,” he said when the Patriot Act was being debated, according to the New Republic, which described him as “the Democratic Party’s de facto spokesman on the war against terrorism.” ***Biden’s proposal probably helped to lay the groundwork for the Bush administration’s Patriot Act.The Center for National Securities reported in 1995:On February 10, 1995, a counterterrorism bill drafted by the ClintonAdministration was introduced in the Senate as S. 390 and in the House ofRepresentatives as H.R. 896.The Clinton Billi mixture of: provisions eroding constitutional andstatutory due process protections, selective federalization — on political grounds — of state crimes (minus state due process rules), discreditedideas from the Reagan and Bush Administrations, and the extension of some of the worst elements of crime bills of the recent past.The legislation would:1. authorize the Justice Department to pick and choose crimes toinvestigate and prosecute based on political beliefs and associations;2. repeal the ancient provision barring the U.S. military from civilian law enforcement;3. expand a pre-trial detention scheme that puts the burden of proof on the accused;4. loosen the carefully-crafted rules governing federal wiretaps, in violation of the Fourth Amendment;5. establish special courts that would use secret evidence to order the deportation of persons convicted of no crimes, in violation of basic principles of due process;6. permit permanent detention by the Attorney General of aliens convicted of no crimes, with no judicial review;7. give the President unreviewable power to criminalize fund-raising for lawful activities associated with unpopular causes;8.renege on the Administration’s approval in the last Congress of aprovision to ensurethat the FBI would not investigate based on First Amendment activities; and9. resurrect the discredited ideological visa denial provisions of theMcCarran Walter Act to bar foreign speakers.22) Marvin Bush was director/ controlling​ shareholder of Stratasec(Securacom, ‘KuAm’) which was in charge of security of the WTC, United Airlines and Dulles International Airport. All three were breached on 9/11. ICTS was another company that provided security at the airports. ‘Wirt Walker’, ‘Ezra Harel’, ‘ICTS”, ‘WTC power downs’.23) “Who killed John O’Neil?”Former FBI task force agent investigating Al Qaeda/Bin Laden. Transferred by Kroll Corporation to head the security just before 9/11. John O’Neil died in the Towers. ‘Jerome Hauer’ ‘Jules Kroll." The Man Who Knew Too Much -Who Killed John O'Neill?From Jerry [email protected]© The Daily Brew Bush Button News1-9-2If you believe the media, John P. O'Neill was simply another innocent victim killed in the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center. But you don't need much imagination to suspect something deeper was at work.Clearly, O'Neill was a man Osama bin Laden wanted dead. O'Neill had been a Deputy Director of the FBI, and Osama bin Laden's main pursuer in the US government. O'Neill had investigated the bombings of the World Trade Center in 1993, a US base in Saudi Arabia in 1996, the US embassies in Nairobi and Dar-Es-Salaam in 1998, and the USS Cole last year.But once the first plane hit the North Tower, Osama bin Laden wouldn't be the only man to profit from O'Neill's death. At the moment of impact, O'Neill became the man who knew too much. Just two weeks, TWO WEEKS, prior to the attack, O'Neill had left his job with the FBI. O'Neill had quit because he believed that the Bush administration had stymied the intelligence agency's investigations on terrorism. O'Neill charged that it had done so even as it bargained with the Taliban on handing over of Osama bin Laden in exchange for political recognition and economic aid. In the ultimate irony, O'Neill had gone public with these charges at the same time that he was leaving the FBI to become the head of security at the World Trade Center."The main obstacles to investigate Islamic terrorism were US oil corporate interests, and the role played by Saudi Arabia in it," O'Neill reportedly told the authors of an explosive new book, Hidden Truth, by intelligence analysts Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie. Brisard met O'Neill several times last summer and reports that O'Neill complained bitterly that the US State Department - and behind it the oil lobby who make up President Bush's entourage - blocked attempts to prove bin Laden's guilt.Released just last November, Brisard and Dasquie's book was mostly ignored by the US media. But it is beginning to cause a stir. Just two days ago, the story aired for the first time on US television when CNN's Paula Zahn interviewed former Iraqi chief U.N. weapons inspector Richard Bulter. "The most explosive charge, Paula, is that the Bush administration -- the present one, just shortly after assuming office slowed down FBI investigations of al Qaeda and terrorism in Afghanistan in order to do a deal with the Taliban on oil -- an oil pipeline across Afghanistan" Butler said.Maybe part of the reason Paula left Faux news is because she knew her right wing bosses would never let her run a story like this one. But what Paula didn't explore, or even mention, was that O'Neill was not alive to confirm or refute those charges. What CNN didn't find interesting was the fact that John P. O'Neill was in his 34th-floor office in the World Trade Tower when the first of two hijacked planes hit the building, or that he phoned a son and a friend to reassure them he was fine. What the US media have apparently found less interesting than the death of Clinton's dog is that we have only the government's version of what happened next. O'Neill is reported to have called FBI headquarters, and then re-entered one of the towers to help others. The official story is that O'Neill was inside when the buildings collapsed. How convenient for the Bush administration that Mr. O'Neill would not only die in the attack, but also that he would make such a call. Not only was the Bush administration's most dangerous critic forever silenced, but he also provided the administration the perfect story to explain his death. Can you imagine how the events of the past four months would have differed had John P. O'Neill, former Deputy Director of the FBI and head of security at the World Trade Tower at the time of the attacks, had been alive to tell this story?Can you imagine the uproar this story would be causing if Bill Clinton were still president?As things stand, only time will tell if O'Neill's story is investigated by the US press that found Monica Lewinsky worthy of two years of our lives. Certainly, the authors who have reported it are credible. Till the late 1990s, Brisard was the director of economic analysis and strategy for Vivendi, the giant French conglomerate that owns Universal Studios and effective control of USA Networks. He also worked for French secret services (DST), and wrote for them in 1997 a report on the now famous Al Qaeda network, headed by bin Laden. Dasquie is an investigative journalist and publisher of Intelligence Online, a respected newsletter on diplomacy, economic analysis and strategy. And Richard Bulter, who put the story in play on the US cable networks, is hardly an excitable conspiracy nut.Perhaps the CIA will investigate. But I wouldn't expect much from them. After all, they were apparently unable to penetrate the same Al Qaeda network that welcomed in John Walker, a confused 20 year old kid from California, who is reported to have met bin Laden himself.Note: See also, a reprint of a recent Bush Watch letter, directly below.__TODAY'S LETTER AT BUSH WATCHThere's really only one thing that needs to be known about the culpability for 9/11 - during the Clinton administration, no requests for a FISA warrant were denied. (Foreign Intelligence Security Act) Under the Bush administration, previous to 9/11, all such requests were denied, because the Bush administration shut down all intelligence inquiries that would expose Saudi complicity with terrorism. The Minneapolis FBI office, with its 20th hijacker in custody since August, asked for a FISA warrant and was denied. New York FBI counter-terrorism chief John O'Neill quit his job in protest of Bush's obstructionism, only to die in his new job as chief of security at the WTC, probably the only man to die that day that understood the context of his death.... --Kent Southard24) Insider trading based upon foreknowledge.‘Put Options.’ Never identified insiders made millions. ‘United and American Airlines’ ‘Raytheon.’This should be the kicker to the whole story. Jews made some serious profit on foreknowledge of the event.I'm still alive, so how could I hijack an airplane and die on 911? ------------->24) At least 7 of the 19 listed highjackers are still alive(BBC). No video footage of 19 highjackers or passengers boarding the 4 planes. Pilots of the 4 planes never squawked the highjacking code. ‘Alive highjackers’, ‘ACARS’, ‘Pilots for 9/11 TruthBBC NEWS REPORTSAnother of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well.The identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt.Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September.His photograph was released and has since appeared in newspapers and on television around the world.Hijacking suspectsFlight 175: Marwan Al-Shehhi, Fayez Ahmed, Mohald Alshehri, Hamza Alghamdi and Ahmed AlghamdiFlight 11: Waleed M Alshehri, Wail Alshehri, Mohamed Atta, Abdulaziz Alomari and Satam Al SuqamiFlight 77: Khalid Al-Midhar, Majed Moqed, Nawaq Alhamzi, Salem Alhamzi and Hani HanjourFlight 93: Ahmed Alhaznawi, Ahmed Alnami, Ziad Jarrahi and Saeed AlghamdiNow he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco.He told journalists there that he had nothing to do with the attacks on New York and Washington and had been in Morocco when they happened. He has contacted both the Saudi and American authorities, according to Saudi press reports.He acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Daytona Beach in the United States and is indeed the same Waleed Al Shehri to whom the FBI has been referring.But, he says, he left the United States in September last year, became a pilot with Saudi Arabian airlines and is currently on a further training course in Morocco. Mistaken identity? Is the government really this stupid?Abdulaziz Al Omari, another of the Flight 11 hijack suspects, has also been quoted in Arab news reports. [Abdelaziz Al Omari] Abdelaziz Al Omari 'lost his passport in Denver' He says he is an engineer with Saudi Telecoms, and that he lost his passport while studying in Denver. Another man with exactly the same name surfaced on the pages of the English-language Arab News. The second Abdulaziz Al Omari is a pilot for Saudi Arabian Airlines, the report says. Meanwhile, Asharq Al Awsat newspaper, a London-based Arabic daily, says it has interviewed Saeed Alghamdi. [Khalid Al-Midhar] Khalid Al-Midhar may also be alive He was listed by the FBI as a hijacker in the United flight that crashed in Pennsylvania. And there are suggestions that another suspect, Khalid Al Midhar, may also be alive.FBI Director, Ashkenazi jew, a dual Israeli citizen, Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.I'm still alive, your government has committed treason! I'd kick the jews out of the USA if I were you all.No Jews died on 911It's a fact. Odigoa is a Jewish Israeli owned messaging company that warned Jewish WTC workers of a pending attack on 911. This is treason, Case closed.None of the jews who supposedly died on 911 can be verifiedin the SSI death index. You can tell me any name you would like, but you can't provide a death certificate or a valid SSN, ergo, it's a complete fabrication!The absolute lies surrounding WTC 7If WTC 7 fell because of "Office Fires" why didn't the Empire State Building fall after a B25 Bomber crashed into the tower? Wtc 7 was the elite building of its decade.There were no planes on 9/11. No human saw any planes on 9/11. Those who claimed they did were used by the Jewish-Zionist media as a setup for TV editing 9/12. On 9/12 the media first showed CGI airplanes crashing into the WTC Towers. This video was captured by a Jewish Diamond merchant. How convenient? News agencies across the country are in on the Mossad's attack upon the USA.View on Desktop

This is a really complicated question to answer. There are a number of things that we can look at and say the Democrats did wrong and the Republicans did wrong. We can do a lot of finger pointing. To me however, there is one defining thing that explains the most. Just prior to becoming confirmed as Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court justice to be, Nixon appointee to SCOTUS, Lewis Powell wrote a memo to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. This memo became the manifesto for the conservatives in the business community urging them to take control of both political parties, the education system, and the media. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce saw to it, and later Congress and the Supreme court saw to it that all recommendations of the Powell memo were implemented. This new conservative agenda completely replaced the Republican agenda championed by Eisenhower And so the dumbing down the U.S. population through the education system and the media began in earnest leading the U.S. inexorably to a Trump presidency. After reading the memo, please checkout the link to a PDF on follow ups to this memo by the Chamber of Commerce, particularly the memo about cracking the news media:Confidential Memorandum: Attack of American Free Enterprise SystemDATE: August 23, 1971TO: Mr. Eugene B. Sydnor, Jr., Chairman, Education Committee, U.S. Chamber of CommerceFROM: Lewis F. Powell, Jr.This memorandum is submitted at your request as a basis for the discussion on August 24 with Mr. Booth (executive vice president) and others at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The purpose is to identify the problem, and suggest possible avenues of action for further consideration.Dimensions of the AttackNo thoughtful person can question that the American economic system is under broad attack. This varies in scope, intensity, in the techniques employed, and in the level of visibility.There always have been some who opposed the American system, and preferred socialism or some form of statism (communism or fascism). Also, there always have been critics of the system, whose criticism has been wholesome and constructive so long as the objective was to improve rather than to subvert or destroy.But what now concerns us is quite new in the history of America. We are not dealing with sporadic or isolated attacks from a relatively few extremists or even from the minority socialist cadre. Rather, the assault on the enterprise system is broadly based and consistently pursued. It is gaining momentum and converts.Sources of the AttackThe sources are varied and diffused. They include, not unexpectedly, the Communists, New Leftists and other revolutionaries who would destroy the entire system, both political and economic. These extremists of the left are far more numerous, better financed, and increasingly are more welcomed and encouraged by other elements of society, than ever before in our history. But they remain a small minority, and are not yet the principal cause for concern.The most disquieting voices joining the chorus of criticism come from perfectly respectable elements of society: from the college campus, the pulpit, the media, the intellectual and literary journals, the arts and sciences, and from politicians. In most of these groups the movement against the system is participated in only by minorities. Yet, these often are the most articulate, the most vocal, the most prolific in their writing and speaking.Moreover, much of the media-for varying motives and in varying degrees-either voluntarily accords unique publicity to these “attackers,” or at least allows them to exploit the media for their purposes. This is especially true of television, which now plays such a predominant role in shaping the thinking, attitudes and emotions of our people.One of the bewildering paradoxes of our time is the extent to which the enterprise system tolerates, if not participates in, its own destruction.The campuses from which much of the criticism emanates are supported by (i) tax funds generated largely from American business, and (ii) contributions from capital funds controlled or generated by American business. The boards of trustees of our universities overwhelmingly are composed of men and women who are leaders in the system.Most of the media, including the national TV systems, are owned and theoretically controlled by corporations which depend upon profits, and the enterprise system to survive.Tone of the AttackThis memorandum is not the place to document in detail the tone, character, or intensity of the attack. The following quotations will suffice to give one a general idea:William Kunstler, warmly welcomed on campuses and listed in a recent student poll as the “American lawyer most admired,” incites audiences as follows:“You must learn to fight in the streets, to revolt, to shoot guns. We will learn to do all of the things that property owners fear.”2 The New Leftists who heed Kunstler’s advice increasingly are beginning to act — not just against military recruiting offices and manufacturers of munitions, but against a variety of businesses: “Since February, 1970, branches (of Bank of America) have been attacked 39 times, 22 times with explosive devices and 17 times with fire bombs or by arsonists.”3 Although New Leftist spokesmen are succeeding in radicalizing thousands of the young, the greater cause for concern is the hostility of respectable liberals and social reformers. It is the sum total of their views and influence which could indeed fatally weaken or destroy the system.A chilling description of what is being taught on many of our campuses was written by Stewart Alsop:“Yale, like every other major college, is graduating scores of bright young men who are practitioners of ‘the politics of despair.’ These young men despise the American political and economic system . . . (their) minds seem to be wholly closed. They live, not by rational discussion, but by mindless slogans.”4 A recent poll of students on 12 representative campuses reported that: “Almost half the students favored socialization of basic U.S. industries.”5A visiting professor from England at Rockford College gave a series of lectures entitled “The Ideological War Against Western Society,” in which he documents the extent to which members of the intellectual community are waging ideological warfare against the enterprise system and the values of western society. In a foreword to these lectures, famed Dr. Milton Friedman of Chicago warned: “It (is) crystal clear that the foundations of our free society are under wide-ranging and powerful attack — not by Communist or any other conspiracy but by misguided individuals parroting one another and unwittingly serving ends they would never intentionally promote.”6Perhaps the single most effective antagonist of American business is Ralph Nader, who — thanks largely to the media — has become a legend in his own time and an idol of millions of Americans. A recent article in Fortune speaks of Nader as follows:“The passion that rules in him — and he is a passionate man — is aimed at smashing utterly the target of his hatred, which is corporate power. He thinks, and says quite bluntly, that a great many corporate executives belong in prison — for defrauding the consumer with shoddy merchandise, poisoning the food supply with chemical additives, and willfully manufacturing unsafe products that will maim or kill the buyer. He emphasizes that he is not talking just about ‘fly-by-night hucksters’ but the top management of blue chip business.”7A frontal assault was made on our government, our system of justice, and the free enterprise system by Yale Professor Charles Reich in his widely publicized book: “The Greening of America,” published last winter.The foregoing references illustrate the broad, shotgun attack on the system itself. There are countless examples of rifle shots which undermine confidence and confuse the public. Favorite current targets are proposals for tax incentives through changes in depreciation rates and investment credits. These are usually described in the media as “tax breaks,” “loop holes” or “tax benefits” for the benefit of business. As viewed by a columnist in the Post, such tax measures would benefit “only the rich, the owners of big companies.”8It is dismaying that many politicians make the same argument that tax measures of this kind benefit only “business,” without benefit to “the poor.” The fact that this is either political demagoguery or economic illiteracy is of slight comfort. This setting of the “rich” against the “poor,” of business against the people, is the cheapest and most dangerous kind of politics.The Apathy and Default of BusinessWhat has been the response of business to this massive assault upon its fundamental economics, upon its philosophy, upon its right to continue to manage its own affairs, and indeed upon its integrity?The painfully sad truth is that business, including the boards of directors’ and the top executives of corporations great and small and business organizations at all levels, often have responded — if at all — by appeasement, ineptitude and ignoring the problem. There are, of course, many exceptions to this sweeping generalization. But the net effect of such response as has been made is scarcely visible.In all fairness, it must be recognized that businessmen have not been trained or equipped to conduct guerrilla warfare with those who propagandize against the system, seeking insidiously and constantly to sabotage it. The traditional role of business executives has been to manage, to produce, to sell, to create jobs, to make profits, to improve the standard of living, to be community leaders, to serve on charitable and educational boards, and generally to be good citizens. They have performed these tasks very well indeed.But they have shown little stomach for hard-nose contest with their critics, and little skill in effective intellectual and philosophical debate.A column recently carried by the Wall Street Journal was entitled: “Memo to GM: Why Not Fight Back?”9 Although addressed to GM by name, the article was a warning to all American business. Columnist St. John said:“General Motors, like American business in general, is ‘plainly in trouble’ because intellectual bromides have been substituted for a sound intellectual exposition of its point of view.” Mr. St. John then commented on the tendency of business leaders to compromise with and appease critics. He cited the concessions which Nader wins from management, and spoke of “the fallacious view many businessmen take toward their critics.” He drew a parallel to the mistaken tactics of many college administrators: “College administrators learned too late that such appeasement serves to destroy free speech, academic freedom and genuine scholarship. One campus radical demand was conceded by university heads only to be followed by a fresh crop which soon escalated to what amounted to a demand for outright surrender.”One need not agree entirely with Mr. St. John’s analysis. But most observers of the American scene will agree that the essence of his message is sound. American business “plainly in trouble”; the response to the wide range of critics has been ineffective, and has included appeasement; the time has come — indeed, it is long overdue — for the wisdom, ingenuity and resources of American business to be marshalled against those who would destroy it.Responsibility of Business ExecutivesWhat specifically should be done? The first essential — a prerequisite to any effective action — is for businessmen to confront this problem as a primary responsibility of corporate management.The overriding first need is for businessmen to recognize that the ultimate issue may be survival — survival of what we call the free enterprise system, and all that this means for the strength and prosperity of America and the freedom of our people.The day is long past when the chief executive officer of a major corporation discharges his responsibility by maintaining a satisfactory growth of profits, with due regard to the corporation’s public and social responsibilities. If our system is to survive, top management must be equally concerned with protecting and preserving the system itself. This involves far more than an increased emphasis on “public relations” or “governmental affairs” — two areas in which corporations long have invested substantial sums.A significant first step by individual corporations could well be the designation of an executive vice president (ranking with other executive VP’s) whose responsibility is to counter-on the broadest front-the attack on the enterprise system. The public relations department could be one of the foundations assigned to this executive, but his responsibilities should encompass some of the types of activities referred to subsequently in this memorandum. His budget and staff should be adequate to the task.Possible Role of the Chamber of CommerceBut independent and uncoordinated activity by individual corporations, as important as this is, will not be sufficient. Strength lies in organization, in careful long-range planning and implementation, in consistency of action over an indefinite period of years, in the scale of financing available only through joint effort, and in the political power available only through united action and national organizations.Moreover, there is the quite understandable reluctance on the part of any one corporation to get too far out in front and to make itself too visible a target.The role of the National Chamber of Commerce is therefore vital. Other national organizations (especially those of various industrial and commercial groups) should join in the effort, but no other organizations appear to be as well situated as the Chamber. It enjoys a strategic position, with a fine reputation and a broad base of support. Also — and this is of immeasurable merit — there are hundreds of local Chambers of Commerce which can play a vital supportive role.It hardly need be said that before embarking upon any program, the Chamber should study and analyze possible courses of action and activities, weighing risks against probable effectiveness and feasibility of each. Considerations of cost, the assurance of financial and other support from members, adequacy of staffing and similar problems will all require the most thoughtful consideration.The CampusThe assault on the enterprise system was not mounted in a few months. It has gradually evolved over the past two decades, barely perceptible in its origins and benefiting (sic) from a gradualism that provoked little awareness much less any real reaction.Although origins, sources and causes are complex and interrelated, and obviously difficult to identify without careful qualification, there is reason to believe that the campus is the single most dynamic source. The social science faculties usually include members who are unsympathetic to the enterprise system. They may range from a Herbert Marcuse, Marxist faculty member at the University of California at San Diego, and convinced socialists, to the ambivalent liberal critic who finds more to condemn than to commend. Such faculty members need not be in a majority. They are often personally attractive and magnetic; they are stimulating teachers, and their controversy attracts student following; they are prolific writers and lecturers; they author many of the textbooks, and they exert enormous influence — far out of proportion to their numbers — on their colleagues and in the academic world.Social science faculties (the political scientist, economist, sociologist and many of the historians) tend to be liberally oriented, even when leftists are not present. This is not a criticism per se, as the need for liberal thought is essential to a balanced viewpoint. The difficulty is that “balance” is conspicuous by its absence on many campuses, with relatively few members being of conservatives or moderate persuasion and even the relatively few often being less articulate and aggressive than their crusading colleagues.This situation extending back many years and with the imbalance gradually worsening, has had an enormous impact on millions of young American students. In an article in Barron’s Weekly, seeking an answer to why so many young people are disaffected even to the point of being revolutionaries, it was said: “Because they were taught that way.”10 Or, as noted by columnist Stewart Alsop, writing about his alma mater: “Yale, like every other major college, is graduating scores’ of bright young men … who despise the American political and economic system.”As these “bright young men,” from campuses across the country, seek opportunities to change a system which they have been taught to distrust — if not, indeed “despise” — they seek employment in the centers of the real power and influence in our country, namely: (i) with the news media, especially television; (ii) in government, as “staffers” and consultants at various levels; (iii) in elective politics; (iv) as lecturers and writers, and (v) on the faculties at various levels of education.Many do enter the enterprise system — in business and the professions — and for the most part they quickly discover the fallacies of what they have been taught. But those who eschew the mainstream of the system often remain in key positions of influence where they mold public opinion and often shape governmental action. In many instances, these “intellectuals” end up in regulatory agencies or governmental departments with large authority over the business system they do not believe in.If the foregoing analysis is approximately sound, a priority task of business — and organizations such as the Chamber — is to address the campus origin of this hostility. Few things are more sanctified in American life than academic freedom. It would be fatal to attack this as a principle. But if academic freedom is to retain the qualities of “openness,” “fairness” and “balance” — which are essential to its intellectual significance — there is a great opportunity for constructive action. The thrust of such action must be to restore the qualities just mentioned to the academic communities.What Can Be Done About the CampusThe ultimate responsibility for intellectual integrity on the campus must remain on the administrations and faculties of our colleges and universities. But organizations such as the Chamber can assist and activate constructive change in many ways, including the following:Staff of ScholarsThe Chamber should consider establishing a staff of highly qualified scholars in the social sciences who do believe in the system. It should include several of national reputation whose authorship would be widely respected — even when disagreed with.Staff of SpeakersThere also should be a staff of speakers of the highest competency. These might include the scholars, and certainly those who speak for the Chamber would have to articulate the product of the scholars.Speaker’s BureauIn addition to full-time staff personnel, the Chamber should have a Speaker’s Bureau which should include the ablest and most effective advocates from the top echelons of American business.Evaluation of TextbooksThe staff of scholars (or preferably a panel of independent scholars) should evaluate social science textbooks, especially in economics, political science and sociology. This should be a continuing program.The objective of such evaluation should be oriented toward restoring the balance essential to genuine academic freedom. This would include assurance of fair and factual treatment of our system of government and our enterprise system, its accomplishments, its basic relationship to individual rights and freedoms, and comparisons with the systems of socialism, fascism and communism. Most of the existing textbooks have some sort of comparisons, but many are superficial, biased and unfair.We have seen the civil rights movement insist on re-writing many of the textbooks in our universities and schools. The labor unions likewise insist that textbooks be fair to the viewpoints of organized labor. Other interested citizens groups have not hesitated to review, analyze and criticize textbooks and teaching materials. In a democratic society, this can be a constructive process and should be regarded as an aid to genuine academic freedom and not as an intrusion upon it.If the authors, publishers and users of textbooks know that they will be subjected — honestly, fairly and thoroughly — to review and critique by eminent scholars who believe in the American system, a return to a more rational balance can be expected.Equal Time on the CampusThe Chamber should insist upon equal time on the college speaking circuit. The FBI publishes each year a list of speeches made on college campuses by avowed Communists. The number in 1970 exceeded 100. There were, of course, many hundreds of appearances by leftists and ultra liberals who urge the types of viewpoints indicated earlier in this memorandum. There was no corresponding representation of American business, or indeed by individuals or organizations who appeared in support of the American system of government and business.Every campus has its formal and informal groups which invite speakers. Each law school does the same thing. Many universities and colleges officially sponsor lecture and speaking programs. We all know the inadequacy of the representation of business in the programs.It will be said that few invitations would be extended to Chamber speakers.11 This undoubtedly would be true unless the Chamber aggressively insisted upon the right to be heard — in effect, insisted upon “equal time.” University administrators and the great majority of student groups and committees would not welcome being put in the position publicly of refusing a forum to diverse views, indeed, this is the classic excuse for allowing Communists to speak.The two essential ingredients are (i) to have attractive, articulate and well-informed speakers; and (ii) to exert whatever degree of pressure — publicly and privately — may be necessary to assure opportunities to speak. The objective always must be to inform and enlighten, and not merely to propagandize.Balancing of FacultiesPerhaps the most fundamental problem is the imbalance of many faculties. Correcting this is indeed a long-range and difficult project. Yet, it should be undertaken as a part of an overall program. This would mean the urging of the need for faculty balance upon university administrators and boards of trustees.The methods to be employed require careful thought, and the obvious pitfalls must be avoided. Improper pressure would be counterproductive. But the basic concepts of balance, fairness and truth are difficult to resist, if properly presented to boards of trustees, by writing and speaking, and by appeals to alumni associations and groups.This is a long road and not one for the fainthearted. But if pursued with integrity and conviction it could lead to a strengthening of both academic freedom on the campus and of the values which have made America the most productive of all societies.Graduate Schools of BusinessThe Chamber should enjoy a particular rapport with the increasingly influential graduate schools of business. Much that has been suggested above applies to such schools.Should not the Chamber also request specific courses in such schools dealing with the entire scope of the problem addressed by this memorandum? This is now essential training for the executives of the future.Secondary EducationWhile the first priority should be at the college level, the trends mentioned above are increasingly evidenced in the high schools. Action programs, tailored to the high schools and similar to those mentioned, should be considered. The implementation thereof could become a major program for local chambers of commerce, although the control and direction — especially the quality control — should be retained by the National Chamber.What Can Be Done About the Public?Reaching the campus and the secondary schools is vital for the long-term. Reaching the public generally may be more important for the shorter term. The first essential is to establish the staffs of eminent scholars, writers and speakers, who will do the thinking, the analysis, the writing and the speaking. It will also be essential to have staff personnel who are thoroughly familiar with the media, and how most effectively to communicate with the public. Among the more obvious means are the following:TelevisionThe national television networks should be monitored in the same way that textbooks should be kept under constant surveillance. This applies not merely to so-called educational programs (such as “Selling of the Pentagon”), but to the daily “news analysis” which so often includes the most insidious type of criticism of the enterprise system.12 Whether this criticism results from hostility or economic ignorance, the result is the gradual erosion of confidence in “business” and free enterprise.This monitoring, to be effective, would require constant examination of the texts of adequate samples of programs. Complaints — to the media and to the Federal Communications Commission — should be made promptly and strongly when programs are unfair or inaccurate.Equal time should be demanded when appropriate. Effort should be made to see that the forum-type programs (the Today Show, Meet the Press, etc.) afford at least as much opportunity for supporters of the American system to participate as these programs do for those who attack it.Other MediaRadio and the press are also important, and every available means should be employed to challenge and refute unfair attacks, as well as to present the affirmative case through these media.The Scholarly JournalsIt is especially important for the Chamber’s “faculty of scholars” to publish. One of the keys to the success of the liberal and leftist faculty members has been their passion for “publication” and “lecturing.” A similar passion must exist among the Chamber’s scholars.Incentives might be devised to induce more “publishing” by independent scholars who do believe in the system.There should be a fairly steady flow of scholarly articles presented to a broad spectrum of magazines and periodicals — ranging from the popular magazines (Life, Look, Reader’s Digest, etc.) to the more intellectual ones (Atlantic, Harper’s, Saturday Review, New York, etc.)13 and to the various professional journals.Books, Paperbacks and PamphletsThe news stands — at airports, drugstores, and elsewhere — are filled with paperbacks and pamphlets advocating everything from revolution to erotic free love. One finds almost no attractive, well-written paperbacks or pamphlets on “our side.” It will be difficult to compete with an Eldridge Cleaver or even a Charles Reich for reader attention, but unless the effort is made — on a large enough scale and with appropriate imagination to assure some success — this opportunity for educating the public will be irretrievably lost.Paid AdvertisementsBusiness pays hundreds of millions of dollars to the media for advertisements. Most of this supports specific products; much of it supports institutional image making; and some fraction of it does support the system. But the latter has been more or less tangential, and rarely part of a sustained, major effort to inform and enlighten the American people.If American business devoted only 10% of its total annual advertising budget to this overall purpose, it would be a statesman-like expenditure.The Neglected Political ArenaIn the final analysis, the payoff — short-of revolution — is what government does. Business has been the favorite whipping-boy of many politicians for many years. But the measure of how far this has gone is perhaps best found in the anti-business views now being expressed by several leading candidates for President of the United States.It is still Marxist doctrine that the “capitalist” countries are controlled by big business. This doctrine, consistently a part of leftist propaganda all over the world, has a wide public following among Americans.Yet, as every business executive knows, few elements of American society today have as little influence in government as the American businessman, the corporation, or even the millions of corporate stockholders. If one doubts this, let him undertake the role of “lobbyist” for the business point of view before Congressional committees. The same situation obtains in the legislative halls of most states and major cities. One does not exaggerate to say that, in terms of political influence with respect to the course of legislation and government action, the American business executive is truly the “forgotten man.”Current examples of the impotency of business, and of the near-contempt with which businessmen’s views are held, are the stampedes by politicians to support almost any legislation related to “consumerism” or to the “environment.”Politicians reflect what they believe to be majority views of their constituents. It is thus evident that most politicians are making the judgment that the public has little sympathy for the businessman or his viewpoint.The educational programs suggested above would be designed to enlighten public thinking — not so much about the businessman and his individual role as about the system which he administers, and which provides the goods, services and jobs on which our country depends.But one should not postpone more direct political action, while awaiting the gradual change in public opinion to be effected through education and information. Business must learn the lesson, long ago learned by labor and other self-interest groups. This is the lesson that political power is necessary; that such power must be assidously (sic) cultivated; and that when necessary, it must be used aggressively and with determination — without embarrassment and without the reluctance which has been so characteristic of American business.As unwelcome as it may be to the Chamber, it should consider assuming a broader and more vigorous role in the political arena.Neglected Opportunity in the CourtsAmerican business and the enterprise system have been affected as much by the courts as by the executive and legislative branches of government. Under our constitutional system, especially with an activist-minded Supreme Court, the judiciary may be the most important instrument for social, economic and political change.Other organizations and groups, recognizing this, have been far more astute in exploiting judicial action than American business. Perhaps the most active exploiters of the judicial system have been groups ranging in political orientation from “liberal” to the far left.The American Civil Liberties Union is one example. It initiates or intervenes in scores of cases each year, and it files briefs amicus curiae in the Supreme Court in a number of cases during each term of that court. Labor unions, civil rights groups and now the public interest law firms are extremely active in the judicial arena. Their success, often at business’ expense, has not been inconsequential.This is a vast area of opportunity for the Chamber, if it is willing to undertake the role of spokesman for American business and if, in turn, business is willing to provide the funds.As with respect to scholars and speakers, the Chamber would need a highly competent staff of lawyers. In special situations it should be authorized to engage, to appear as counsel amicus in the Supreme Court, lawyers of national standing and reputation. The greatest care should be exercised in selecting the cases in which to participate, or the suits to institute. But the opportunity merits the necessary effort.Neglected Stockholder PowerThe average member of the public thinks of “business” as an impersonal corporate entity, owned by the very rich and managed by over-paid executives. There is an almost total failure to appreciate that “business” actually embraces — in one way or another — most Americans. Those for whom business provides jobs, constitute a fairly obvious class. But the 20 million stockholders — most of whom are of modest means — are the real owners, the real entrepreneurs, the real capitalists under our system. They provide the capital which fuels the economic system which has produced the highest standard of living in all history. Yet, stockholders have been as ineffectual as business executives in promoting a genuine understanding of our system or in exercising political influence.The question which merits the most thorough examination is how can the weight and influence of stockholders — 20 million voters — be mobilized to support (i) an educational program and (ii) a political action program.Individual corporations are now required to make numerous reports to shareholders. Many corporations also have expensive “news” magazines which go to employees and stockholders. These opportunities to communicate can be used far more effectively as educational media.The corporation itself must exercise restraint in undertaking political action and must, of course, comply with applicable laws. But is it not feasible — through an affiliate of the Chamber or otherwise — to establish a national organization of American stockholders and give it enough muscle to be influential?A More Aggressive AttitudeBusiness interests — especially big business and their national trade organizations — have tried to maintain low profiles, especially with respect to political action.As suggested in the Wall Street Journal article, it has been fairly characteristic of the average business executive to be tolerant — at least in public — of those who attack his corporation and the system. Very few businessmen or business organizations respond in kind. There has been a disposition to appease; to regard the opposition as willing to compromise, or as likely to fade away in due time.Business has shunted confrontation politics. Business, quite understandably, has been repelled by the multiplicity of non-negotiable “demands” made constantly by self-interest groups of all kinds.While neither responsible business interests, nor the United States Chamber of Commerce, would engage in the irresponsible tactics of some pressure groups, it is essential that spokesmen for the enterprise system — at all levels and at every opportunity — be far more aggressive than in the past.There should be no hesitation to attack the Naders, the Marcuses and others who openly seek destruction of the system. There should not be the slightest hesitation to press vigorously in all political arenas for support of the enterprise system. Nor should there be reluctance to penalize politically those who oppose it.Lessons can be learned from organized labor in this respect. The head of the AFL-CIO may not appeal to businessmen as the most endearing or public-minded of citizens. Yet, over many years the heads of national labor organizations have done what they were paid to do very effectively. They may not have been beloved, but they have been respected — where it counts the most — by politicians, on the campus, and among the media.It is time for American business — which has demonstrated the greatest capacity in all history to produce and to influence consumer decisions — to apply their great talents vigorously to the preservation of the system itself.The CostThe type of program described above (which includes a broadly based combination of education and political action), if undertaken long term and adequately staffed, would require far more generous financial support from American corporations than the Chamber has ever received in the past. High level management participation in Chamber affairs also would be required.The staff of the Chamber would have to be significantly increased, with the highest quality established and maintained. Salaries would have to be at levels fully comparable to those paid key business executives and the most prestigious faculty members. Professionals of the great skill in advertising and in working with the media, speakers, lawyers and other specialists would have to be recruited.It is possible that the organization of the Chamber itself would benefit from restructuring. For example, as suggested by union experience, the office of President of the Chamber might well be a full-time career position. To assure maximum effectiveness and continuity, the chief executive officer of the Chamber should not be changed each year. The functions now largely performed by the President could be transferred to a Chairman of the Board, annually elected by the membership. The Board, of course, would continue to exercise policy control.Quality Control is EssentialEssential ingredients of the entire program must be responsibility and “quality control.” The publications, the articles, the speeches, the media programs, the advertising, the briefs filed in courts, and the appearances before legislative committees — all must meet the most exacting standards of accuracy and professional excellence. They must merit respect for their level of public responsibility and scholarship, whether one agrees with the viewpoints expressed or not.Relationship to FreedomThe threat to the enterprise system is not merely a matter of economics. It also is a threat to individual freedom.It is this great truth — now so submerged by the rhetoric of the New Left and of many liberals — that must be re-affirmed if this program is to be meaningful.There seems to be little awareness that the only alternatives to free enterprise are varying degrees of bureaucratic regulation of individual freedom — ranging from that under moderate socialism to the iron heel of the leftist or rightist dictatorship.We in America already have moved very far indeed toward some aspects of state socialism, as the needs and complexities of a vast urban society require types of regulation and control that were quite unnecessary in earlier times. In some areas, such regulation and control already have seriously impaired the freedom of both business and labor, and indeed of the public generally. But most of the essential freedoms remain: private ownership, private profit, labor unions, collective bargaining, consumer choice, and a market economy in which competition largely determines price, quality and variety of the goods and services provided the consumer.In addition to the ideological attack on the system itself (discussed in this memorandum), its essentials also are threatened by inequitable taxation, and — more recently — by an inflation which has seemed uncontrollable.14 But whatever the causes of diminishing economic freedom may be, the truth is that freedom as a concept is indivisible. As the experience of the socialist and totalitarian states demonstrates, the contraction and denial of economic freedom is followed inevitably by governmental restrictions on other cherished rights. It is this message, above all others, that must be carried home to the American people.ConclusionIt hardly need be said that the views expressed above are tentative and suggestive. The first step should be a thorough study. But this would be an exercise in futility unless the Board of Directors of the Chamber accepts the fundamental premise of this paper, namely, that business and the enterprise system are in deep trouble, and the hour is late.Footnotes (Powell’s)Variously called: the “free enterprise system,” “capitalism,” and the “profit system.” The American political system of democracy under the rule of law is also under attack, often by the same individuals and organizations who seek to undermine the enterprise system.Richmond News Leader, June 8, 1970. Column of William F. Buckley, Jr.N.Y. Times Service article, reprinted Richmond Times-Dispatch, May 17, 1971.Stewart Alsop, Yale and the Deadly Danger, Newsweek, May 18. 1970.Editorial, Richmond Times-Dispatch, July 7, 1971.Dr. Milton Friedman, Prof. of Economics, U. of Chicago, writing a foreword to Dr. Arthur A. Shenfield’s Rockford College lectures entitled “The Ideological War Against Western Society,” copyrighted 1970 by Rockford College.Fortune. May, 1971, p. 145. This Fortune analysis of the Nader influence includes a reference to Nader’s visit to a college where he was paid a lecture fee of $2,500 for “denouncing America’s big corporations in venomous language . . . bringing (rousing and spontaneous) bursts of applause” when he was asked when he planned to run for President.The Washington Post, Column of William Raspberry, June 28, 1971.Jeffrey St. John, The Wall Street Journal, May 21, 1971.Barron’s National Business and Financial Weekly, “The Total Break with America, The Fifth Annual Conference of Socialist Scholars,” Sept. 15, 1969.On many campuses freedom of speech has been denied to all who express moderate or conservative viewpoints.It has been estimated that the evening half-hour news programs of the networks reach daily some 50,000,000 Americans.One illustration of the type of article which should not go unanswered appeared in the popular “The New York” of July 19, 1971. This was entitled “A Populist Manifesto” by ultra liberal Jack Newfield — who argued that “the root need in our country is ‘to redistribute wealth’.”The recent “freeze” of prices and wages may well be justified by the current inflationary crisis. But if imposed as a permanent measure the enterprise system will have sustained a near fatal blow.Followup: http://law2.wlu.edu/deptimages/Powell%20Archives/PowellSpeechResearchAOFESMemo.pdfHere is Bill Moyers take on it: The Powell Memo: A Call-to-Arms for Corporations | BillMoyers.com