What Are Federal Housing Programs Under Most Federal Housing: Fill & Download for Free

I'm seeing this every day on my way to work, where the homeless encampment along the edge of the 110 has grown larger and larger every day. And the thing is that the people who live in those tents don't look like you're typical Skid Row homeless.How bad is it?A census of the homeless in Los Angeles County released in May found that the number of people bedding down in tents, cars and makeshift encampments had grown to 9,535, nearly double the number from two years earlier. More than half of the estimated 44,000 homeless in Los Angeles County live in the city limits, according to the census. And nearly 13,000 in Los Angeles County become homeless each month, according to a recent report from the Economic Roundtable.Los Angeles Puts $100 Million Into Helping HomelessSo what does spending $100 million accomplish?But many longtime advocates for the homeless here said the City Council’s proposal was not likely to make a big dent in the number of people who are finding themselves on the streets. “Encampments used to be contained to Skid Row, where city officials would try to control or ignore them,” said Gary Blasi, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, who has studied homelessness in the region for years. “Plans have been made, and never made it off the paper they’re written on. It’s not clear what will be delivered. And do the math here — it doesn’t amount to much at all.”The problem is that people are getting pushed out of traditionally low-rent areas in LA, and more and more short-term hotels are being closed down and being replaced by Doggy Daycares and other services that cater to the well-heeled Angelino. More and more young families are finding themselves living in a tent or in their car thanks to the fact that they cannot afford housing. This problem is not limited to LA as pretty much every major city in the US has its own homeless problem.The Coalition For The Homeless proposes the following solutions:Federal housing assistance: Federal housing programs are one of the most successful housing-based solutions to reduce homelessness. The two largest federal housing programs are public housing and federal housing vouchers, known as Housing Choice Vouchers or Section 8 vouchers. Housing vouchers allow low-income households to rent modest market-rate housing of their choice and provide a flexible subsidy that adjusts with the family’s income over time. Studies show that public housing and federal housing vouchers are highly successful at reducing family homelessness and in ensuring that these families remain stably housed out of the shelter system.Permanent supportive housing: Pioneered in New York City in the 1980s, permanent supportive housing has now proven to be a successful and cost-effective solution to the homelessness crisis. The supportive housing model combines affordable housing assistance with vital support services for individuals living with mental illness, HIV/AIDS or other serious health problems. Moreover, numerous research studies have shown that permanent supportive housing costs less than other forms of emergency and institutional care. The landmark 1990 City-State “New York/New York Agreement,” which has been renewed twice, is the premier example of a permanent supportive housing initiative that successfully reduced homelessness in New York City and saved taxpayer dollars that would otherwise have been spent on costly shelters and hospitalizations.“Housing first”: Another proven solution developed in New York City and replicated nationwide is the “housing first” approach to street homelessness, which builds on the success of permanent supportive housing. The “housing first” approach involves moving long-term street homeless individuals — the majority of whom are living with mental illness, substance abuse disorders and other serious health problems — directly into subsidized housing and then linking them to support services, either on-site or in the community. Research studies have found that the majority of long-term street homeless people moved into “housing first” apartments remain stably housed and experience significant improvements in their health problems. Much like permanent supportive housing, the “housing first” approach is far less costly than emergency and institutional care, such as shelters, hospitals and correctional facilities.Clearly the homeless problem becomes exacerbated when you add in mental health and substance abuse issues. However, creating a larger infrastructure to deal with the myriad of social issues that arises with such a large homeless problem takes an acknowledgement of the problem rather than a policy to sweep it under the rug. It seems that they City of LA and Mayor Garcetti have identified that this problem must be dealt with and have allocated the funds to do so. Where it goes remains to be seen.

Hookers and Blow: When the CIA bought prostitutes for Johns and then secretly drugged them so they could watchBackground and FoundingOperation Midnight Climax was a sub program of the Government's notorious MK Ultra mind control program, itself an attempt to investigate the feasibility of actually brainwashing and controlling a victim for military or covert utilization. In OMC however the tactics were even more outlandish and involved prostitution, entrapment, and multiple illicit substances.In 1954 a chemist and U.S. Government spymaster with a penchant for assassinations and scientific experimentation, Sidney Gottlieb, began OMC with full cooperation of the U.S. Government and under the direction of the Federal Narcotics Bureau. It’s purpose was to investigate the effects of LSD on imbibers who were unaware of having been dosed.LogisticsTo accomplish these observations the CIA used a series of safe houses in San Francisco and New York as drug dens to lure their unsuspecting patients with hookers. The women would canvas local bars and clubs to ply their trade before bringing the men back to the houses. Here they would provide and allow the men to consume any number of narcotics and other drugs but specifically and especially LSD. The men, during the course of their foreplay would be given a drink with high doses of acid and encouraged to drink freely. The agents would watch from the other side of a two way mirror to document the effects of their psychedelic sexual exploits.After some initial experimentation the operation was expanded to include secretly dosing people in public. Soon the agency was dosing people IN the clubs, restaurants and on beaches to observe the results the way an ethologist watched animals in nature. Eventually the research was expanded to probe the nature of sexual blackmail and suggestive mind control before rousing the interest of regulators and critics.ResultsThis went on until 1965 in San Francisco and 1966 in New York when the houses were shut down and the project ultimately abandoned. Imagine the stories though! Random men given high doses of LSD and then subjected to the wiles of women who were trying to brainwash and blackmail them when they thought they were just a stud who got lucky!Eventually this all came out when journalist Seymour Hersh exposed the project in the 70’s and now it stands as a stark reminder if not a darkly hilarious anecdote of unrestricted governmental abuse of power.

The federal aid being requested by the Democrats in the House are above and beyond Covid-19 issues. They want a significant amount of federal dollars to be fungible in order to prop up the underfunded pension systems promised to public sector labor unions.The unfunded liabilities have been ignored for decades by Democratic Party governors and mayors.The Bottom Line: Illinois’ Public Pension Debt Is A Moral IssueCalifornia's State and Local Liabilities Total $1.5 Trillion | California Policy Center$5.2 Trillion Of Government Pension Debt Threatens To Overwhelm State Budgets, TaxpayersThe Congressional system is currently broken. It’s next to impossible to pass legislation during an election year because most of the House and Senate bills passed don’t have legs enough to pass both houses for reconciliation for presidential signature.Here is why 15 Democratic Party Congressional Representatives voted against Pelosi’s “Heroes Act”.The 14 Democrats who broke with their party on coronavirus relief voteEDITORIAL: Democrats’ HEROES Act an embarrassment of pork, liberal policiesHence, Trump’s executive orders attempting to extend unemployment payments and prevent renter evictions through the use of his “pen and phone” ala Obama.President Trump signed four executive actions Saturday to provide additional jobless aid, suspend the collection of payroll taxes, avoid evictions and assist with student-loan payments. Mr. Trump made the moves as talks in Congress over a broad new coronavirus aid package remained deadlocked and are seen as potentially accelerating talks.House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) and others said Sunday that Mr. Trump had breached congressional spending authority with the moves, and that his plan wouldn’t provide enough relief. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin defended the legality of the actions and countered that holding up relief for millions of Americans could have consequences.Here is a breakdown of the executive actions.What did President Trump announce on jobless aid?Mr. Trump said Saturday that the administration would roll out a $400 weekly payment, funded 75% by the federal government and 25% by states. It wasn’t clear if the states would go ahead and provide that share, given that many of them are facing budget shortfalls due to the coronavirus-sparked recession.“We’re looking at it right now to see whether we can do this,” Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican, said on CNN Sunday. New York’s Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo rejected the plan as “just an impossibility,” saying the state’s 25% share would cost it $4 billion that it doesn’t have.A Labor Department spokesman said late Sunday that states are encouraged, but not required, to provide the extra $100 a week per person, meaning recipients could still get the additional $300 even if their state doesn’t provide extra funds.Supplemental payments from the federal government of $600 a week expired recently, but Congress hadn’t agreed on a replacement.Under the executive action, the additional jobless benefits will be paid from the Disaster Relief Fund, the government’s primary source of money to pay for emergency costs. The extra weekly benefits would be available until Dec. 6, about a month after the Nov. 3 election, or until the disaster fund’s balance drops to $25 billion, according to the executive action. To pay for the benefits, the action sets aside $44 billion from the disaster fund, which currently has a balance of about $70 billion.The administration said states could tap the $80 billion in remaining money from an earlier round of state and local aid to help make their 25% portion.The move by Mr. Trump came as negotiators made no progress in bridging the Democrats’ proposal to restart benefits at the $600 rate and Republicans’ desire for a lower rate, of either $200 a week or 70% of previous wages, when combined with state aid. In negotiations with Democratic leaders, Republicans proposed renewing the federal benefits at $400 a week.What did Trump say about evictions?An executive order signed by the president Saturday directs the Treasury and Housing and Urban Development departments to identify funds to provide temporary financial assistance to renters and homeowners who are struggling to meet their monthly rental or mortgage obligations during the pandemic. The order also directs HUD to take action to “promote the ability of renters and homeowners to avoid eviction or foreclosure.”It doesn’t reauthorize the eviction moratorium set in the Cares Act that expired at the end of July. That applied only to properties with government-backed mortgages, covering just one-third of renters. Housing experts say the best way to prevent a wave of evictions—and a domino effect of defaults and foreclosures by landlords—would be for Congress to enact a nationwide eviction moratorium and appropriate money for rental assistance.Regulators could potentially instruct the government-sponsored mortgage corporationsFannie Mae and Freddie Mac to offer landlords forbearance on their monthly mortgage payments if their tenants can’t pay rent, assuming they don’t evict the tenants. But Fannie and Freddie are overseen by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which is independent.The order directs the FHFA to “review all existing authorities and resources that may be used to prevent evictions and foreclosures for renters and homeowners.”Other government housing agencies such as the Federal Housing Administration fall under the president’s umbrella, but they technically can’t spend money that isn’t given to them by Congress.What about the payroll tax?Mr. Trump directed the Treasury Department to defer the 6.2% Social Security tax on wages for employees making less than about $100,000 a year. That suspension would last from Sept. 1 through Dec. 31.If employers stop withholding those taxes, the move would deliver an increase in take-home pay just as Mr. Trump is running for re-election but also create a looming liability in 2021 because the taxes would still be due eventually. Mr. Trump said he would press Congress to turn the deferral into an actual tax cut.The tax code gives the Treasury secretary authority to delay tax filing and collection after presidentially declared disasters. The administration already used this authority to postpone a series of spring tax deadlines until July 15 and used it again Friday to delay some excise-tax collections. It is far from certain that many employers will stop withholding payroll taxes given the potential for future liability.What did the president do about student-loan payments?The Cares Act gave most borrowers with federal student loans a six-month interruption of their monthly payments, interest-free. The law applies to roughly 35 million borrowers whose loans are held by the federal government. It excludes about eight million borrowers whose loans are held by private lenders with a government guarantee, under a federal program that ended in 2010. The payment moratorium is set to expire Sept. 30.Saturday’s executive memorandum from Mr. Trump said the administration would extend the payment moratorium and zero interest until the end of the coronavirus crisis. What’s in Trump’s Executive Actions on Coronavirus Aid—and What’s Not