Organizational Development Proposal Samples: Fill & Download for Free

Psychology is a niche field which has many applications now in many industries.LPU’s Program consists of the following electives and outcomes:COGNITIVE PROCESSESDevelop understanding about theoretical developments in the areas of attention, perception, memory, language, problem solving.Course Outcomes:Through this course students should be able to develop familiarity with major concepts in cognitive psychology.discriminate the approaches and models of attention and memory evaluate the cognitive system of language and problem solving.apply the skills acquired for logical reasoning and decision making in cognitive psychology.illustrate balance among different cognitive functions following the cognitive psychology paradigms.FUNDAMENTALS OF RESEARCHThis course would will give overview of research, thrust areas and emerging trends, societal and industrial problems, literature survey and gap identification, research quality and ethics.This course would also include the writing and presentation part of research.Course Outcomes: Through this course students should be able to develop research aptitude and get in-depth understanding of various methods of research.identify the appropriate research problem and conduct research in an effective way.understand indexing systems of various journals.apply ethics of research in writing research paper and dissertation thesis.understand basics of intellectual property rights.PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTThis course focuses on the practical part of different psychological concepts.Course Outcomes: Through this course students should be able to discuss aspects of psychological measurement.apply the scientific skills to measure the human behavior.interpret the results of psychological assessment.deduce future behavior as per the test results.SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGYFocuses on the psychology of students at different levels of schools.Course Outcomes: Through this course students should be able to develop skills and roles to positively impact children, families, classrooms, and schools.demonstrate knowledge and competencies involving cognitive and psycho educational assessment measures.apply principles of school psychology to solve mental health issues of school children.illustrate acquired skills in behavior assessment of school children.SPECIALIZATION ELECTIVE 1Courses which give depth in a chosen area. A student can choose courses from the same area to get expertise.THEORIES AND SYSTEMS OF PSYCHOLOGYDevelops understanding regarding emergence and major perspectives of psychology.Course Outcomes: Through this course students should be able to identify historical roots of theories and principles in psychology.appraise the contribution of different schools in emergence of psychology as a science.examine the development of psychology in Indian perspectives.illustrate the skills in evaluation of different psychological schools thoughts.ADVANCED PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTProvides the practical measures of psychological concepts.Course Outcomes: Through this course students should be able to develop skills in different methods for assessing aspects of human behavior use psychological knowledge in behavioral assessment gain conceptual clarity and applied proficiency in psychological assessmentDISSERTATION-IProposing a research plan including objectives, hypothesis, methodology through engagement with the relevant body of literature and theories.Course Outcomes: Through this course students should be able to identify the types of scientific publishing and its rating.tabulate the components and their sequence in a research manuscript.develop the skills required for scientific article publishing in psychology develop the research proposal to conduct the researchRESEARCH METHODS AND DESIGNThis course would will give overview of research tools and designs essential for conduct of research.This course will also make students conversant with different statistical tools including sampling and research designs ,methods of data collection, graphs and presentation, basics of SPSS, statistical tools and analysis.Course Outcomes: Through this course students should be able to discuss the fundamentals of statistics used in research and development identify research techniques and their use in research classify statistical methods in context of descriptive and inferential statistics formulate and test hypothesis based on the nature of the research problemSPECIALIZATION ELECTIVE 2Courses which give depth in a chosen area. A student can choose courses from the same area to get expertise.STATISTICAL TECHNIQUESFosters skills in using and applying Psychological Statistics.Course Outcomes: Through this course students should be able to Compute manual and computerized statistical calculations Use psychological statistics to solve complex research problems Introduce statistics as a scientific and effective tool for research in PsychologyTEST CONSTRUCTIONThis course focuses on the how to construct the test and how to check the reliability and validity of the test.Course Outcomes: Through this course students should be able to develop critical consciousness and an appreciation of a variety of ways of knowing.use psychological principles to solve problems in applied settings such as schools, businesses, and other organizations.create psychological tool to generate solutions that address practical problems in wide-ranging contexts ranging from the family to the clinic to various settings.The specializations offered are as follows:CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGYADVANCED CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY: Provides the understanding about clinical specialization, assessment techniques and diagnostic part.CLINICAL ASSESSMENT: Provides knowledge about how to assess the disorders .PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS: Application of various psychotherapeutic strategies to deal with behavioral problems and their intervention.PSYCHOLOGY AND PERSONAL GROWTH: This course focuses on the factors responsible for personal growth of an individual and how to maintain it.PSYCHOPATHOLOGY: Introduces different perspectives and models regarding causation of various psychological disorders.ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGYLEADERSHIP AND ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE: Provides the basic knowledge about the types of leader, their characteristics and why and how change occur in an organization.MANAGING ORGANISATIONAL CULTURE AND PROCESSES: Provides the knowledge regarding the organizational culture and its management process.ORGANISATIONAL INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY: Focuses on the important psychological concepts which are beneficial to understand and develop the organization or industry .PSYCHOLOGICAL ISSUES IN HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT: Focuses on the different psychological concepts beneficial for human resource development .POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGYPSYCHOLOGY OF HAPPINESS: Focuses on the positive side of the psychology like how to make life balanced , happy and productive.PSYCHOLOGY OF HIGH PERFORMANCE: Provide understanding about the psychological factors which plays an important role in high performance.PSYCHOLOGY OF PEACE: Focuses on the positive bent of mind and how to make life peaceful and beneficial for oneself and for society.It is proven from the program contents and intent that it is a purely employability focused program in this niche field.If the kind of exposure and program outcomes suit your aspirations, It is definitely a great idea to join this program at LPU.DVD

I’ve been recruiting and hiring for over twenty years. I’ve been on the agency side and the corporate side, and been a manager/leader of recruiting for small, medium and large companies. The article by Rajiv Prabhakar linked HERE is quite accurate.I’ve said in the past, many times, that recruiting is “broken.” Usually I’m referring to the more structural aspect of hiring—but it’s entirely true that even the philosophical underpinnings of what we do have very little basis in either matching or predictive validity.There are a lot of aspects to recruiting that need to be fixed—but I think this article is actually (appropriately) focusing on “employee selection methods.”It’s been long-known among industrial/organizational psychologists that interviews are very unreliable employee selection tools. Structured interviews fare slightly better. The tool that has the best-researched outcome is a “work product test” or “work sample test.” That shouldn’t surprise anyone, since it most closely approximates actually doing the work you want to be done!Controversially, IQ also has a strong predictive value for some roles. Other assessments that involve relevant work-related skills can at least be objective and well-researched—which can at least “tighten up” the employee selection process (be careful, a TON of assessments out there aren’t well-researched).Personality tests are widely used—but not correctly used.I’d love to write a book about this, but Dr. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic has (more or less) already written it: The Talent Delusion. It’s well-researched, properly cited, and both critical and interestingly written. Reading other answers of mine here at Quora should give you some insights into some of the problems (and solutions) that I’d propose. The short answer is that we incorporate multiple assessment methods into our selection process—and preferably multiple STRONG assessments.The REAL solution is invasive and costly—and presumably the current process is “good enough” in comparison to those costs to ignore it. Or maybe nobody has really educated our leaders well enough about the problems and they just assume that this is as good as it gets!(If anyone is aware of a company that is really doing employee-selection well, let me know. I’m defining “well,” as having a strong candidate experience, giving the selection process a basis in science which has strong predictive validity, and which is efficient.)

My two cents. A lot of people here talked about certain visible aspect of programmer culture, like fads, machismo, dogmatism, and prevalence of unsubstantiated claims. In my opinion these things are symptoms.The underlying cause, in my opinion, is that most programmers are actually conservative and reactionary.The most upvoted answer here is about how annoying a lot of programmers are, because they tend to push some new, fashionable thing. Isn't that a bit odd? If most programmers are so enamoured with fashionable new technologies, shouldn't these answers be very unpopular? Or is the sample of programmers on Quora so heavily biased towards sensible and pragmatic ones?What bothers me the most, is how most programmers I've interacted with and most software development teams I've worked with refused to accept the human side of their work, while focusing on old and by now irrelevant argument tropes. OOP vs FP! TDD vs DDD! Typed vs Untyped! The whole “JavaScript is a bad language” trope is a brilliant example. JavaScript is untyped, has some quirks, but most importantly has first-class functions and lexical scoping, meaning you can implement most language features you need. It has its niche applications, where it's a good fit. What else is there to discus? Yet the flame wars rage on.Most software projects I've encountered both professionally and as an amateur programmer have had the same problems, which are totally unrelated to the above arguments. For example:Documentation either doesn't exist or is very bad. In fact, my hypothesis about popularity of OSS projects is that it is driven not by the technology it encompasses, but by the quality of its documentation.Software not portable across environments. The software equivalent of the reproducibility crisis.Dependency-mania and coupling. A few years back I was looking for a Ruby library for date calculations. I needed to write a small maintenance script. The most popular one at the time had ActiveRecord (and consequently RoR) as a dependency…Most software is bad in adjusting with business or organizational changes. New head developer? Rewrite everything, because predecessor’s code is incomprehensible. New feature requirement? Remodel the whole architecture, because we've assumed this feature will never be requested. Etc.Software projects are notoriously prone to major delays.And so on. Which of these problems are solved by deciding for a functional programming language or an OO language? None. Which of these problems are solved by being clear of all the JavaScript quirks? None.The problem is, that these problems originate in team dynamics. Some technologies and languages are better in enabling team work, some are worse. For example, in my opinion .Net languages are good for team work. MSDN is brilliant, C# and F# allow you to produce comlrehendable and shareable code. On the other hand, languages like Ruby or Lisp are more “personal”. Dependent on your team, they might make it more challenging for members to work together. For example, through undisciplined use of monkey patching and macros. Yet people talk about these technical features, ignoring “human features”.On the other hand, a lot of personal and emotional problems in developer teams are often suppressed and then get dressed up as tech discussions. For example, ambitious young programmer wanting to leave her mark pushes for a change in the product. She proposes to achieve that using algorithm X. Older colleagues feel threatened by her ambition, but are ashamed to discuss this openly, hence they criticize X as much as they can. At some point their criticism of X takes on the life of its own in the organization and turns into a trope.In my opinion, good developer teams listen to each other, are often aware of their own groupthink, and are aware of their dynamics. Too into fads? Maybe we should try being more down to earth. Havent used anything besides Java for a long time? Maybe we are missing out on better tech. Religiously SCRUMy? Maybe we're overdoing it. One developer dominating all meetings? Maybe our meeting roles need readjusting.But instead of figuring these things out, most programmers focus on comfortable things they are familiar with. Favorite language. Favorite tool. Favorite trite programming dogmas. Favorite complaints.