Application Form For A General Injunction: Fill & Download for Free

This would be called a coup d’etat.You see, Trump has already stated what he considers an “honest recount.”So let’s talk, honestly and fairly, as these are very strong claims:Trump supporters allege that there is election fraud, and that this election fraud cost Trump the Presidency.They say they have proof that this fraud was widespread and coordinated.The result of their fervent application of the United States Justice system is the following:All the courts have thrown out, with prejudice, their claims.All State Legislatures have thrown out their claims, or just refused to hear them.The head of security for the elections, appointed by Trump, said that the election was secure and fair. He was fired.The Attorney General of the United States, probably one of the most ardent Trump supporters that isn’t part of the general population, said there is no evidence of fraud.IF there was election fraud, it would have had to be massive, coordinated, and multi-state.As election officials are from all political stripes, Republicans would have to have been complicit in this massive election fraud.There is not a single election board, Lt. Governor, or election official that says there was any evidence of fraud AT ALL. Not a single one.The Supreme Court of the United States gave this response to the complaint that came before them: “The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied.” That is SCOTUS-speak for “talk to the hand”.So, we as Americans have a simple, binary choice:Trump is arguing with the officials and fans after the game is over, and at the same time setting up a Lost Cause grievance, and his supporters have deluded themselves into believing that there was fraud because they simply cannot accept that they lost. The result of this is that the sitting President of the United States should waive every citizen’s Constitutional rights, effectively destroying the very fabric of this Nation in order to support their need for power, ORHe lost the Election fair and square, and our Nation continues on.Because in the end, one man, or even one party is not important. The strength of our nation is important.Seriously, it is that simple.Anyone who would consider such a drastic course of action should consider the following items:In a Democracy, should any one party be able to question the integrity of an election without more than anecdotal evidence?Once the Judicial System has ruled, should any political party that is truly dedicated to the rule of law and the fabric of our Republic and its continuation continue to contest the election?Should any State political party call for a Civil War to contest an election?And finally, AND THIS IS IMPORTANT: if a sitting President refuses to accept publicly the outcome of an election that is determined by election officials AND THE JUDICIARY to be free and fair, whether that President leaves or not, should that Ex-President be re-nominated by his political party?I believe, as a proud American and a Republican who has lost his party to nationalistic, jingoistic hooligans, that what the Republican Party is doing is seditious, unpatriotic, and toxic to our nation.If you despise Trump and aren’t a Democrat, join us. Save smart, sensible, fiscal conservatism with a heart for the people, an ear for our challenges, and respect for the Republic.Dedicated Americans Protecting Democracy | The Lincoln Project

Interim order is passed by the court in pending proceedings generally on an interim application such as application for injunction, for stay, for release of property, relaxation of condition, for bail, etc.Whereas impugned order is the order which is in challenge before the higher court, for instance, an order rejecting an application is challenged by a party in the higher court, such order becomes impugned in that appeal or revision petition.

Question: “Why is it so easy for people to ignore or dismiss the extreme corruption of the Obama administration?”There is no evidence of extreme corruption or even any corruption in the Obama administration. There were zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. A comparison to other recent administrations shows how unusual this is:Bush, George W. (R) – 8 yrs in office. 16 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 9 prison sentences.Clinton (D) – 8 yrs in office. 2 criminal indictments. One conviction. One prison sentence.Bush, George H. W. (R) – 4 yrs in office. One indictment. One conviction. One prison sentence.Reagan (R) – 8 yrs in office. 26 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 8 prison sentences.Carter (D) – 4 yrs in office. One indictment. Zero convictions and zero prison sentences.Ford (R) – 4 yrs in office. One indictment and one conviction. One prison sentence.Nixon (R) – 6 yrs in office. 76 criminal indictments. 55 convictions. 15 prison sentences.Johnson (D) – 5 yrs in office. Zero indictments. Zero convictions. Zero prison sentences.The Obama administration is the only one since Watergate without a single indictment.A look at what one writer considers corruption reveals how flimsy these allegations are. The article Obama: The Most Corrupt President In American History? lists the New Black Panther Party, the IRS delay in granting of tax-exempt status to pro-life and Tea Party groups, phony prosecutions of big banks, the failure to prosecute Hillary Clinton for misuse of classified information, and the use of the Steele dossier to obtain a FISA warrant for Carter Page as corrupt.As reported by Newsweek, The New Black Panther Party “scandal” was:In 2008, a lone white voter reported he had encountered two black men dressed all in black, one carrying a nightstick, at his Philadelphia polling place in a predominantly black neighborhood. The armed man was escorted away by police, and no one reported the incident to the local district attorney. …Several months after the 2008 Election Day incident (and 13 days before President Obama was sworn in) the Department of Justice filed a civil lawsuit against the NBPP under the Voting Rights Act, alleging voter intimidation. In May 2009, Justice—now led by Attorney General Eric Holder, Obama's appointee—successfully obtained an injunction against King Samir Shabazz, the man who carried the nightstick, then dropped the suit, Fox News reported. A spokeswoman at Justice says a career attorney made the call, which was then affirmed by an appointee, because "the facts and the law did not support pursuing claims against the other defendants in the case. A federal judge determined that the relief requested by the Department was appropriate." The New Black Panther Party Is the New ACORNThis is hardly the stuff of epic corruption.The IRS “scandal” was not an example of corruption. It was an example of some politically obtuse IRS employees in the Determinations Unit in the Cincinnati Office looking out for certain political terms in applications for tax exempt status.Between April 2010 and April 2012, the IRS placed on hold the processing of applications for 501(c)(4) tax-exemption status received from organizations with "Tea Party,” "patriots,” or "9/12" in their names. During this time, only 4 were approved. During the same general period, the agency approved applications from several dozen presumably liberal-leaning organizations whose names included terms such as "progressive,” "progress,” "liberal,” or "equality.”The Columbia Journalism Review explained it:Rather than the Nixonian conspiracy that George Will and The Wall Street Journal editorial page so darkly warned about—with zero evidence—you have a routine bureaucratic procedure meant to bundle potentially problematic applicants together for further review. The “abuses” the right has screamed about are the same ones that nonprofit journalism applicants like SF Public Press, The Lens, and many others faced, especially long delays and invasive questioning (and, ultimately, approval—no Tea Party group’s application ultimately was denied). Again, this was not some big secret. It was readily available information. The IRS scandal unwindsThis was bureaucratic bungling at a regional level. It was not some nefarious plot by the Obama administration.Allegations of phony prosecution of big banks is a canard. These banks nearly brought down the world economy through their fraudulent behavior. For instance, a Justice Department press release about a settlement with JPMorgan stated:The settlement includes a statement of facts, in which JPMorgan acknowledges that it regularly represented to RMBS investors that the mortgage loans in various securities complied with underwriting guidelines. Contrary to those representations, as the statement of facts explains, on a number of different occasions, JPMorgan employees knew that the loans in question did not comply with those guidelines and were not otherwise appropriate for securitization, but they allowed the loans to be securitized – and those securities to be sold – without disclosing this information to investors. This conduct, along with similar conduct by other banks that bundled toxic loans into securities and misled investors who purchased those securities, contributed to the financial crisis. Justice Department, Federal and State Partners Secure Record $13 Billion Global Settlement with JPMorgan for Misleading Investors About Securities Containing Toxic MortgagesThese banks admitted fraud. It’s disingenuous to call these settlements “shakedowns.”Obama kept far from the investigation into the Clinton email controversy. The decision not to prosecute her was Comey’s. He made that decision because he did not believe she would be successfully prosecuted. Ironically, Comey may have cost Clinton the election by announcing that the case was re-opened days before the election.The FISA warrant controversy has been well addressed by now. Carter Page was the subject of FBI interest well before he was associated with the Trump campaign. The FBI was looking into Page’s trip to Moscow in June 2016, before they knew about the dossier. In any event, the dossier has proven to be accurate in the areas that can be corroborated. The article makes numerous unproven conjectures about this, such aswas Obama personally involved in the use of the Trump/Russia Dossier to seek a FISA warrant to surveil the Trump campaign? We await the definitive proof.None of this is corruption. The IRS bungled its job. However, it wasn’t corrupt. The Obama administration was exemplary in its discipline and lack of corruption.