The Outline Should Be In Sentence: Fill & Download for Free

I believe what your asking is “How do I turn off my ‘inner editor’? Many people have the problem that they revise while writing. In my opinion, this is a mistake, since what you should be doing is revising your draft. You don’t have a draft to revise until you’ve completed the draft. So I believe you should try the following.NEVER EDIT until you’ve completed the first draft. Do not allow yourself to make any changes, even to correct typos until the entire draft is completed.Put yourself under some time pressure. Nothing focuses the mind like a deadline. So put a word requirement in force X words per day, every day, no editing.Start with a 1-page outline. Only 1 page, no more! Write until you’ve expanded the outline into a draft. For example if you want to write a 75,000 word novel, your 1-page outline should be 12 sections (chapters) with 3–5 sentences in each section which represent scenes.Only after you have hit your word-count target, or completed the draft based on the entire outline can you switch the editor back on. Let the inner editor go wild, but when writing a draft constantly remind the inner editor that it isn’t their turn yet.

To fix this problem, lots of things will need to change.Perhaps the biggest problem is that we keep inventing new crimes. Lawmakers should be told that writing new laws that outline more crimes isn't always a good thing. In fact, most of the actions the new laws deal with are already covered by existing statute. The new bills usually add additional penalties and make it easier to prosecute. We shouldn't be making it easier to prosecute when we already have such a corrupt prosecution (anyone read about Leavenworth? I guarantee you we're only seeing the tip of that iceberg).If you can't easily identify a victim, then there is no crime. Maybe there are civil penalties, but without a readily identifiable victim, a crime hasn't been committed.Severe limits should be put on prosecutors. They should have a certain amount they can spend per case, as well as how much their cases will cost society. I mean that prosecutors should have a limit to the number of years they can mete out when it's us, the citizens, that have to pay for it. Prosecutors need to have limited resources so they can go after the important cases instead of just locking up everyone they possibly can.Plea bargaining is sinful. I was told, “Jim, if you don't accept this plea, you'll wind up doing twenty years or more.” How can you possibly be treated fairly in a circumstance like that?There should be no penalty for going to trial. Trial is supposed to be a right enshrined in The Constitution. We've come to treat trials as a costly option. If the crime is important enough to destroy lives, it's important enough to go to trial.Judges should be the most powerful person in the courtroom. Most people don't realize this, but often the prosecutor is the one running the show. The prosecutor uses plea deals to get exactly what she wants, and the judge is obligated to comply.Judges should all have worked as defense attorneys. Most judges are former prosecutors. I believe they need a balanced work history.Judges should be required to check in with people they've sentenced after the first year, again at five and ten years, upon release, and several years after release. How can they know if what they're doing to people's lives is working if they never see the results of it?All evidence should be made available to the defense. Prosecutors are only required to share potentially exculpatory evidence. Who decides what's exculpatory? The prosecution. It's like letting one football team also be the referee. It works just like you'd expect — they cheat.Prosecutors’ offices should NEVER be in the courthouse. This extends a benefit to them the defense does not enjoy.Prosecutors and police who knowingly lie, obstruct justice, or intentionally violate the rights of the accused should face HARSH penalties. We've entrusted them with incredible power. If they misuse it, they should not be able to hide behind any immunity clauses.Speedy trials should mean exactly that. Your right to a speedy trial doesn't work the way you think it does. The clock the judiciary uses has a pause button on it… several pause buttons in fact. There are all sorts of processes that the court stops the speedy trial countdown for… usually its just for the convenience of the court. Again, if the crime is important enough to destroy someone's life, then you'll find time in your busy calendar to make it happen, your “honor.”I'm sure that, as always, once I hit submit, more things will occur to me… but that's a decent start.

As the others have mentioned, you should definitely take a stab at writing it yourself. If you follow Matt’s advice here, you should be able to produce an outline and even a first draft that are solid enough. And you’ll improve your writing in the process.Now, this doesn’t mean you shouldn’t hire a ghostwriter, or a “developmental editor” once you have the outline or the first draft. In fact, if you don’t consider yourself a good writer, you should probably seek one. The difference is, you’ll actually have a good idea of what your novel should look like, so it’ll make the collaboration all the more fruitful.There are several steps at which hiring a professional ghostwriter or editor can be particularly invaluable.Once you have your outlineThough it is not that common a practice among authors, it can be enlightening to have your outline revised by a professional editor, especially if you’re a first-time author. Of course, the outline should be detailed enough for the editor to have some “substance” which they can analyze and critique.This will help you identify any plot holes, flawed character arcs, or pacing issues before you even write the first draft. Basically, it’s a crash course in creative writing, without taking, you know, an actual course. Might even be cheaper.This can be done either by a ghostwriter or a developmental editor. You can then hire the ghostwriter to actually write the book, saving you all the steps below (first draft, revisions, etc.). But keep in mind that in order to write a full novel, a professional ghostwriter will ask you anywhere between $50k-$100k (and you should be wary of any quote below that).Once you have a solid draftGenerally, editors are loathe to working on an author’s first draft, so you should try to revise it as much as you can on your own, paying especial attention to timeline, characters, environment, scenes, transitions, pacing, sentence starts and dialogue.Then, once you feel you can’t take the draft any further on your own, you can hire a developmental editor to refine it further.How to choose a good ghostwriter or editorOnce you know exactly what path you want to take and where in the process you will seek professional help, you can actually go on the hunt for that professional help. I recommend checking out curated marketplaces of editors and ghostwriters, as well as asking other authors for recommendations (maybe just post a question here!).If you’re looking for a ghostwriter, check out this exhaustive infographic on how to choose the right one (not as easy as one might think!).