Order - Michigan Courts: Fill & Download for Free

I think it might. Here is the EC mapAll the brown states have a huge amount of claims of voter fraud, irregularity and mistakes. Now there is always fraud in every election. The thing is, most instances feature only a handful of votes. This time around, there are 500 affidavits totaling over 10,000 cases of voter fraud, and those numbers are growing.Now, as with any issue where there are plenty of claims, especially regarding politics, many of these claims will end up being false or misleading. However, many will end up being true and proving voter fraud. Others will be end up being true, but the “fraud” was due to mistakes or incompetence rather than malice.What all this means in real life is anyone’s guess. Maybe it means there was a great conspiracy that stole the election from Trump. Maybe it means there were many individual actors on the left who acted alone or in small groups to help give Biden an edge. Maybe it means their was some fraud, but mostly mistakes and Biden still wins the election. We don’t know.Here is the list of states and what I think might happen:Arizona - Biden has a shrinking 11,000 vote lead. I think Trump will close this to within 10K or even 5K, but I think Biden will still win the state the first go-around. However, factoring in fraud and errors will combine to give Trump the win here in the inevitable recount.Georgia - Biden has a 13,000 vote lead here. Some of the allegations of fraud here seem to have some merit, and we are already heading for a recount. I think Trump pulls out a win in GA.North Carolina - Trump will almost certainly win NC outright once they finally decide to start counting again.Wisconsin - Biden won by only 20,000 votes. There are many irregularities in this state, along with many accusations of fraud. A recount here is also inevitable. I think Trump gets up to10K votes closer, but Biden hangs on here.Michigan and Pennsylvania - It is in these 2 states that the bulk of irregularity and alleged fraud occurred. The mail-in system in PA specifically was a disaster(regardless of how much/little fraud took place). I think PA will likely end up being decided by the courts. MI could potentially even be heading for a re-vote.Obviously a lot of things need to go Trump’s way in order for him to win. However, here is how I see it looking after the recounts. As to how the final 2 states go, I do not even have a guess at this point.

Hello my Fellow Patriots:Instances of wide-spread fraud, corruption, and voter suppression continues to cast an ominous cloud over our 2020 election! I would encourage all of you to maintain the course of hope with the patriotic passion that this country was built upon.Thanks for the Contributor request Everything Republican. It is my honor and patriotic duty to share informative information on your platform.Below you’ll find every legal proceeding currently ongoing as of November 14, 2020. The Election Litigation Tracker is updated daily. So I encourage everyone to tone out the negative narratives that we are being barraged with by all the forces that are aligning against a President that God Almighty has ordained for our country at this time. Instead, focus on relevant content such as what you will find below.Stand assured on the fact that we are already victors. We may not get the results that we want immediately, but the cat is out of the bag! The prognosticators of the evil corruption that we see before us are being exposed in an unprecedented manner. I’m fortunate to have sources within President Trump’s administration keeping me updated as things unfold, and my fellow patriots I assure you that we will prevail!!In addition to the states in which President Trump is currently leading, there are a variety of scenarios in which he can still win the election. One scenario involves maintaining the states in which he currently hold a lead in. Another scenario is dependent upon the legal outcome of current litigation in combination with the above scenario. And yet still, there exists a scenario of the inclusion of new affidavits in the process of being submitted into litigation. We have hundreds of credible affidavits in motion for litigation review, some of which are whistle-blowers from inside the Dominion Voting System company. Also add to the equation the recounts and audits that are pending.That’s where we are at this point. I encourage anyone who knows anything about voting irregularities in their respective states to contact: Report Fraud, Waste or Abuse. It’s imperative that you have verifiable evidence: video, audio recordings, or any credible sources you may be aware of.The deck may appear to be stacked against us, but we have the Trump card in our corner.2020 Election Litigation TrackerWelcome to the 2020 Election Litigation Tracker, a joint project of Election Law at Ohio State and SCOTUSblog. During the 2020 election season, we will provide up-to-date information on major election law cases as they make their way through every level of the court system. Our goal is to serve as a resource on election law and administration for the general public, lawyers, educators, journalists and policymakers. You can read all of our previous election-related coverage here. [Disclaimer: SCOTUSblog and Election Law at Ohio State are nonpartisan and do not endorse, support or oppose any candidate, campaign or party.]Credit: Art LienElection Cases We’re WatchingCase PageIssue(s)CourtPennsylvania Democratic Party v. BoockvarWhether a decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court requiring the state to count mail-in ballots received up to three days after Election Day, as long as they are not clearly postmarked after Election Day, violates federal election law and the Constitution.U.S. Supreme CourtDonald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. BensonWhether Michigan's constitution and election laws require that absentee ballots be counted in the presence of an "elections inspector" from each political party; and if so, whether the state should stop counting ballots until that requirement is met or separate ballots counted without representatives of both parties present.Michigan Court of ClaimsHotze v. HollinsWhether nearly 127,000 votes cast via drive-through voting during the early voting period in Harris County, Texas, which contains much of the city of Houston, violate state election laws and should be invalidated.U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th CircuitCarson v. Simon(1) Whether a measure by Minnesota elections officials extending the deadline for timely postmarked absentee ballots to be received and still counted until one week after Election Day violates the U.S. Constitution; and (2) whether the challengers, two nominees to serve as Republican Party presidential electors in Minnesota, have legal standing to challenge the measure.U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th CircuitTexas League of United Latin American Citizens v. AbbottWhether Texas' limitation of one absentee ballot drop-off site per county violates the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act.U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th CircuitMichigan Alliance for Retired Americans v. BensonWhether a policy by the secretary of state of Michigan extending the deadline to receive absentee ballots that are postmarked by Election Day until 14 days after Election Day violates federal law and the U.S Constitution.Michigan Court of AppealsDonald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. BoockvarWhether a number of Pennsylvania elections accommodations in light of the coronavirus pandemic – providing additional drop-off sites and alleviating signature-matching requirements for absentee ballots, as well as lifting a restriction on employing out-of-county poll workers – violate state election law and the U.S. Constitution.U.S. District Court for the Western District of PennsylvaniaMi Familia Vota v. HobbsWhether previous stay-at-home orders and other closures due to the coronavirus pandemic justify an extension of Arizona's voter registration deadline past the original date of Oct. 5, 2020.U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th CircuitArizona Democratic Party v. HobbsWhether recent changes to Arizona's election procedures – which provide both absentee voters whose signatures on their mail-in ballots cannot be verified, and in-person voters who cannot provide proper identification at the polls, up to five days after Election Day to remedy their ballot identification issues – must also be extended to absentee voters who submit unsigned ballots.U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th CircuitThe New Georgia Project v. RaffenspergerWhether Georgia's requirement that absentee ballots be received by 7 p.m. on Election Day poses an unconstitutional infringement on the right to vote in light of the coronavirus pandemic.U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th CircuitMemphis A. Philip Randolph Institute v. HargettWhether Tennessee may enforce a number of vote-by-mail regulations for the November 2020 election, including preventing first-time voters from applying for an absentee ballot, barring third-party distribution of absentee ballot applications, and a process for verifying signatures on mail-in ballots.U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th CircuitWashington v. TrumpWhether recent changes announced to the United States Postal Service violate federal administrative rulemaking requirements and infringe upon the rights of states to regulate elections under the Constitution.U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of WashingtonTexas Democratic Party v. AbbottWhether a Texas law requiring voters under the age of 65 to provide an excuse in order to vote by mail violates the 26th Amendment or the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.U.S. District Court for the Western District of TexasPeople First of Alabama v. MerrillWhether the coronavirus pandemic requires alleviating the enforcement of three Alabama election provisions: that absentee ballots must be signed in the presence of a notary or two adult witnesses, that applications for absentee ballots must include copies of valid photo ID, and that counties may not offer curbside voting.U.S. Supreme CourtMoore v. CircostaWhether coronavirus-related changes implemented after the start of absentee voting by North Carolina elections officials to a number of absentee ballot procedures – extending the deadline to receive ballots, and modifying requirements for postmarking and third-party collection of them – violate the state legislature's power to regulate elections under the Constitution as well as the equal protection clause.U.S. Supreme CourtOhio Democratic Party v. LaRoseWhether Ohio state law bars election officials from providing more than one absentee-ballot drop box per county, in light of the state's expected increase in mail-in voting due to the coronavirus pandemic.Tenth District Ohio Court of AppealsJones v. Secretary of State of MaineWhether the Maine constitution requires a full citizen-initiated referendum, as opposed to a "people's veto" effort, to repeal a ranked-choice voting law passed by the state legislature in July 2019 that went into effect in January 2020 without Gov. Janet Mills' signature.U.S. Supreme CourtDemocratic National Committee v. BostelmannWhether the coronavirus pandemic requires a number of changes to Wisconsin's election procedures, such as extending the deadline to return absentee ballots, permitting electronic delivery of those ballots for voters who do not receive them in time to mail them, and lifting the restriction on employing out-of-county poll workers.U.S. Supreme CourtA. Philip Randolph Institute of Ohio v. LaRoseWhether, due to an expected increase in mail-in voting due to the coronavirus pandemic, Ohio's provision of one absentee-ballot drop box per county infringes upon the right to vote in violation of the First and 14th Amendments.U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th CircuitRaysor v. DesantisWhether Florida's statutory requirement that prior felons pay all court costs and fees before regaining the right to vote is an unconstitutional poll tax under the 24th Amendment.U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th CircuitDonald J. Trump for President v. WayWhether an executive order by the governor of New Jersey in light of the coronavirus pandemic that requires mail-in ballots to be sent to all registered voters in the state, and extends the deadline for submitting them, violates federal election law and the Constitution.U.S. District Court for the District of New JerseyDonald J. Trump for President v. CegavskeWhether recent changes by the state legislature to Nevada's voting procedures including, among other things, the expansion of voting-by-mail and a requirement that officials count ballots received up to three days after Election Day, violate federal election law and the Fourteenth Amendment.U.S. District Court for the District of NevadaSource: 2020 Election Litigation Tracker - SCOTUSblog

Congress declares the winner. I believe it happens on January 6th this time.The Electoral College determines the winner. They meet in mid-December to vote, though the actual electors have to be determined a few days earlier.11/11 Update: As of this date, with Pennsylvania having been uncalled by some election monitors, there is no longer a presumed winner. The Electoral College vote, if you count Nevada for Biden (which is iffy as are Michigan and Wisconsin) at 259 votes for Biden to 217 for Trump. It looks like this:Remove the states that are recounting or facing legal challenges (NV, WI, MI, PA, GA, AZ) the Electoral College count is Biden 227 and Trump 231.Per the Constitution, states determine their own voting rules and regs, but federal courts adjudicate. Federal courts will be busy until the Electoral College voters are chosen settling the many lawsuits filed this election, and any with potentially election-changing consequences will be heard by the Supreme Court. It will be interesting to see what they determine in the case of a state like Pennsylvania with multiple unrecoverable mistakes and frauds.The Department of Justice as well is having to get involved this year and may be bringing suits that need to be heard and settled prior to mid-December. With so many suits brought by different parties, it will be a challenge to clear the decks in order not to disrupt the schedule.However, all of this is “archy,” the proper functioning of our government. Factions of the Democratic Party have been practicing (and getting away with) anarchy for many months already. So far they have actually been protected by the acquiescence of Democratic prosecutors in the jurisdictions in which they are “protesting.”Should Trump prevail in reversing enough state votes to swing the election (a possibility), we will likely see a continuation of anarchy in Democratic cities. However, given the cost in lives, property and to the economy of that anarchy, some remedy that permits federal intervention—the Insurrection Act for instance—may be invoked to bring it to a rapid end.So the answer, mostly for those living in Democratic-run cities, is you already have anarchy. Should the vote turn to favor Trump, you will likely see more but probably only for a little while.It is most unfortunate that the Democrats and their media backers have jumped the gun in declaring Joe Biden president-elect. That in itself is a bit of anarchy as that status is determined by the Electoral College and the Congress. At a time of great division, with the country needing to be unified, it is a most divisive move that will serve to undermine a Biden presidency should he actually be elected. That is being compounded by the fact that as the media-proclaimed “president elect,” Biden is already in discussions with foreign governments. Beyond being a violation of the Logan Act, that breach makes a quite dubious statement about his sense of “archy.”Here is the long version why no one should be surprised when the election result is reversed: