The Birth Certificate Bond Explained: Fill & Download for Free

This is one of the bizarre ideas at the core of some seriously deranged legal theories that fall under the category that Justice J. D. Rooke of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta identified as “Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments”, and which in the United States are normally identified as “sovereign citizen” arguments. These arguments are sometimes used by litigants in both US and Canadian courts in order to try to defeat the jurisdiction of civil and sometimes criminal courts. There are a wide range of seriously bizarre ideas that are found within this body of “law”; one of them is the notion that birth certificates are some sort of document that connects the individual to some large deposit of money (usually gold) held somewhere which the individual can gain access to by filing the correct series of bizarre legal paperwork.The legal theories behind these claims are fundamentally incomprehensible and can really be described as nothing other than a form of ritual magic, involving the specific utterances of ritual phrases at the right moments during a legal proceeding, using specific colors of ink when writing one’s name, writing one’s name in all caps, in all lower case, or surrounded by colons, and so forth. Postage stamps have some mystical significance, as do notaries public.I can’t really do justice to this body of performance art, but I don’t have to: Justice Rooke’s monumental epic on the topic, the Reasons accompanying Meads v. Meads, 2012 ABQB 571 (CanLII), are the definitive work on the topic. They’re long, but they’re worth the read if you’re even slightly interested in this topic. I will quote a few passages:Mr. Meads stated that his birth certificate has an associated bond with large amounts of money that could easily discharge in full the claims advanced by Ms. Meads. He said this Court could order that payment. He then attempted to provide me with an envelope, presumably containing documents. Mr. Meads said the contents of the envelope had been “filed internationally”: a UCC filing, a Canadian filing, a commercial security agreement, an identity bond, “actual and constructive notices”, hold harmless and identity agreements, non-negotiable security agreements, an affidavit of his status, a copyright and trade-mark of his name contract, and definitions of the words used in those documents. “UCC” means the “Uniform Commercial Code”, which is U.S. commercial legislation.…The mythology behind the ‘A4V’ scheme is extremely peculiar, and requires travel into the conspiratorial and demon-haunted shadow world of the OPCA community. Aspects of this scheme are explained in reported U.S. cases, including: United States v. Heath, 525 F.3d 451 (6th Cir. 2008); United States v. Anderson, 353 F.3d 490, 500 (6th Cir. 2003), certiorari denied, 541 U.S. 1068 (2004); United States v. Oehler, 2003 WL 1824967 (D. Minn. Apr. 2, 2003), affirmed, 116 Fed. Appx. 43 (8th Cir. 2004); United State v. Eddie Ray Kahn et al., No. 1:08‑cr‑00271‑RCL‑1 (U.S.D.C. D.C. May 26, 2010). As I understand it, A4V’s guru promoters claim that each person is associated with a secret government bank account which contains millions of dollars. The exact sum varies from guru to guru. The bank account’s number is usually related to some identification number assigned to a person by the state, such as a Social Security Number, a Social Insurance Number, or a birth certificate number. The specific details of that relationship also seem to vary between A4V schemes.These schemes are obviously nonviable, but there are people who are absolutely convinced that they’re true and that they work, or will work once they figure out the precise manner in which to invoke them.

There is no monetary value to a birth certificate or a social security number/EIN, and TreasuryDirect accounts must be funded by the owner (through payroll deductions or from purchasing directly from the owner's personal bank account) to have any value.—TreasuryDirectHere is the page at TreasuryDirect explaining the fraud:Birth Certificate Bonds - TreasuryDirect

Showing my son his birth certificate.I gave birth to an out of wedlock child; in my culture it's forbidden to do so. An unmarried woman giving birth to a child is considered as sinner.My parents send me away to have him. Originally we wanted to put him up for adoption, but at the last minute my parents changed their mind and adopted him. I was only 18 at that time, not quite underage but also not of legal age yet.He grew up thinking I'm his sister, when one day at school he saw a copy of his birth certificate (he's only 10 y.o). The first thing he asked was why was he born out of the state we are living in.The second, why is my name stated as his mother and not my mom.I remember the day when I wait for him after school, took him to lunch, then handed him the original copy of his birth certificate. I look into his 10 years old eyes and said "I'm actually your mother. Mom is not your mother, she's your grandma", expecting him not to fully understand what's happening.He went quiet, finishes his meal, and asked to go home.The drive back home was an agonizing one. I didn't know what to expect from him.I was scared.I had explain to him roughly, of the circumstances and why things are the way they were. I had hope he could forgive me for the things I've done.Then the next day, he left me a note under my door that said "whoever you are, you're still my mother. Thank you."Up to this day, he still addresses me as sister and call my mom by "mama" but deep inside, only we both know the bond we have between each other. He's growing into a wise young man.I'm still not married. And I've learned to not put other man as priority, except if he's my son. We only have each other end of the day.Edit: thank you for the kind words, people. I'm in my 30's now. Son is in high school. I live with my parents and my son. I'm thankful to have parents who are not typical Muslim Asian; I've seen my friends being disowned by their family after the same thing happened to them. For my parents to take such risk for the sake of their daughter, that's courageous on their part as well. I learned from the best examples :)Edit 2: seems like everyone is wondering whereabouts of the father. He and I, parted on good terms. He didn't play any active role in our life, but I harbour no bitter feelings towards him. He has made his decision and I respected that. We all have reasons why we act in certain ways. According to Islam, when an unmarried woman give birth, the kid is decided to only have mother, not a legal father. But I don't deny his biological father from seeing him. As I have pointed out in a comment, my son has expressed his wishes to reunite with his dad, although he has not get back to us on that. I am a successful professional despite the bump on the road experience I went through. It makes me who I am today; I learn not to be prejudice of anyone's decision without knowing their history. Suffice to say, indirectly I'm telling my son to get going even when the worst is thrown at you.