Affidavit Form Zimbabwe: Fill & Download for Free

We live in India where we believe in Unity in Diversity. Diversity everywhere. Languages, ideologies, dialects, accents, vocabulary and fucking pronunciation too!Parents named me: AAKRITI JHABorn in Bihar, biharis knew how to pronounce ‘JHA'.But then we shifted to Gujarat and since then there was no turning back and knowing my original name.Aakruti ZahaBecause in gujarati ‘Ri' is pronounced as ‘Ru’ and there's no letter in Gujarati pronouncing Jha as it is. They pronounce it as ‘Za’ only.Then I had an innovative friend of mine who was so obsessed with ‘1st', be it ranking or vowel, out of a, i & u he chose a, and hence invented the following:Aakrati ZaThen my cousin sister born and brought up in UK brought up:Aakhrity JhaThat's what they mentioned in their application for leave in their school to come to India. (In the application the reason for leave being my marriage to some Arjun. I am still finding my husband.)Then a hasty organiser committee member of my college fest, awarded me with a certificate having the following spelling:Aakrarti ZhaThen as a teen when I knew nothing about facebook, a friend of mine made an account for me and the profile name being:Akkriti ZzhaIn school there was a heavy conflict about the spelling and the principal compelled us to get an affidavit for replacing ‘u' with ‘i' in Aakriti which was the original name mispelt by them as Aakruti. (She wasn't even a Gujarati.)So, AAKRUTI JHA, is my name where ‘JHA’ is pronounced in the similar way you pronounce ‘jha’ in ‘Jharkhand' and not as in ‘Zimbabwe'.Wait, what did I just write? Shit, it's AAKRITI not AAKRUTI. Fuck!Bye.

What do you think about land redistribution in South Africa?AJ Venter’s answer to this question and criticism of other answers causes me to think of Neville Chamberlain, British Prime prior to the Second World War waving his agreement with Hitler for all to see and proudly pronouncing “Peace in our time”. We can trust Hitler; what a nice fellow.Shortly afterwards the world was plunged into a war and Jews subjected to torture and murdered on an industrial scale by that “nice fellow” megalomaniac Hitler.Background:An introduction is required to give a better perspective.The Dutch East India Company based in Amsterdam established a replenishment station for their large fleet of ships on 6th April 1652 in Cape Town that were plying trade between the East and Europe. That was the only practical sea route because the Suez Chanel had not yet been built. 366 years ago.The handful of Dutch staff stationed at the Cape soon got to know the only local indigenous inhabitants – the San and Khoikhoi.The Dutch staff were predominately males and had a glorious time with the willing khoisan ladies and that resulted in the grouping of South African citizens knows as the “Coloureds”. It is a relatively large group of several millions so the activities of the handful of Dutch and Khoisan ladies may be described as “frenzied”.There were groups of indigenous blacks spread out in clusters in some parts of South Africa at that time – nowhere near Cape Town.Some were: Xhosa’s in the current Eastern Cape Province around the Fish River; Zulus in current day KwaZulu-Natal around Current day Pietermaritzburg, Ulundi, Eshowe ; Sothos in a small area of the Free State, Sothos, Tshwanes, Pedi’s, Ndebeles, etc in the area later to be known as the “Transvaal” in small groupings. A number of these tribes – like the Zulus – had fled from the current day Zimbabwe to get away from the Matabele tribe.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_South_AfricaLarge, massive swathes of the current-day South Africa were uninhabited.During the early 1800’s the Boers – with many non-Boers who had previously lived in the Cape Colony and Natal – were frustrated by being subject to British rule with very few rights.They arranged a series of migrations into the mostly uninhabited central part of South Africa to get away from the British in what is known as the Great Trek.The first organized large-scale migration started in 1836.Map of Trek routes taken by the Boers during the Great Trek. Kindly Note the areas where the tribes were and the large areas that were uninhabited.The Boers migrated into the interior and mostly to uninhabited areas or areas adjacent to occupied zones. They never evicted blacks from land that they occupied.Lack of Pre-colonial Black Land OwnershipBlacks who claim that their ancestors had land stolen from them do not realize or pretend not to know that their ancestors never owned any land at any time prior to colonization.Yes, you read that correctly.Each tribe had a King and all the land claimed by that tribe was owned exclusively by the King.The Kings allocated land as they saw fit and that was always coupled to what was beneficial to the Kings.The allocation was temporary and actual ownership was not allowed.The Kings could, and did, evict dwellers and take back possession of the land at any time. They frequently did that as punishment or because they had tired of someone.The King told each person where to build their hut and how big the dwelling group could be.A senior person – as arbitrarily selected by the King – could erect more than one hut.The average person could not.Traditional leadersSouth Africa still has a system of ‘Traditional Leaders’ that runs in parallel to the Constitutional democracy and it is neither democratic nor modern.It is a throwback to pre-colonial times.The “Leaders” are either appointed by other “Leaders” or inherit the position.They have very large tracts of land under their control – and they temporarily allocate it exactly on the same basis as did the Kings of the tribes in pre-colonial times.They also evict the inhabitants when they feel like it. The inhabitants have no right of appeal or any other rights.The traditional Leaders frequently use the land rights that they allocate in return for favours or rental.These “Traditional” parasites have made it known that they will cause big problems for the government if “their” land is taken from them.Why are the blacks who are unhappy about white ownership silent about this injustice?It is hypocritical.These professional parasites also demand a salary and benefits which have to be paid by the fiscus.http://www.sahistory.org.za/article/chieftaincy-and-kingship-south-africaExpropriation without Compensation:This has been tried in Zimbabwe and has failed miserably.Zimbabwe was known as the bread-basket of Africa at the time of independence when Robert Mugabe took over.Land expropriation without compensation took place on a large scale and is one of the primary reasons why Zimbabwe is an economic and social disaster today.Black South Africans have not learned from that perfect example of what happens when this policy is implemented.AJ Venter alludes to groups having to prove that their ancestors stayed on a piece of land as part of the legal process to submitting a claim.That is nonsense. I live in a community where a number a farms have been claimed and the proof given – and accepted - is an affidavit signed by the people claiming the land stating that it was their forefather’s land. That’s it.The fact that the land was uninhabited before the colonials settled and built the farms from scratch is irrelevant to those who intend to steal it.It is up to the farmers to prove that the claimants do not have a claim because these affidavits have been, and are, accepted as gospel truth by the same officials and Judges that AJ Venter claims will ensure fair due process!The only land claimed to date is successful and expensive farming land.No shabby, run-down or unsuccessful farm has yet been claimed.No undeveloped land has been claimed.Why claim undeveloped land when it is possible to steal developed land with expensive infrastructure from a minority who have no protection from the government?That, in itself, says it all – theft on a huge scale is in progress and it is now proposed that the process be accelerated and land expropriated without compensation.It is also being proposed that claims be allowed on any other properties with the intension of expropriating those as well without compensation. Any white person’s house is therefore under threat as well.All the above is only applicable to whites.If a black man owns a farm or a house that he legally bought from a white man then that property cannot be touched.If a white man legally bought a property from a black man then that land can be siezed.Farms in possession of the GovernmentThere are 4,323 farming units already in the hands of the South African government that were legally purchased from farmers but never transferred to claimants.Why?Because in each and every case there is more than one group of different claimants that swore under oath that their ancestors - and only their ancestors - lived on the land.That perfectly illustrates the lack of validity of the claims. The thieves are falling out.Real Land reformIt is necessary to address the land issue but this way is not only criminal theft but economic suicide and stupidity.If South Africa goes down this road it will destroy the country to such an extent that it will make the economic catastrophe that Mugabe caused for Zimbabwe look like a picnic.Any individual or corporation considering investing in South Africa must understand clearly that they are gambling recklessly with their funds. The value of that investment will evaporate as the South African economy and currency disintegrate.For those who think expropriation without compensation is a good idea - kindly read the following:Expropriating land without compensation is impossible—take it from ZimbabweLand Expropriation: An attack on poor black South AfricansBlacks do own land:The false impression has intentionally been created that blacks do not own land and they therefore have justification to seize and steal white-owned land.Black people, for example, already own more than half of all agricultural land in two of South Africa’s most fertile provinces: the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal.https://www.fin24.com/Economy/kill-dangerous-property-nationalisation-slogans-with-facts-economist-201602227.5 million black home owners https://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/expropriation-not-just-a-threat-to-whites-but-to-75m-black-homeowners-too-says-afribusiness-20180306https://businesstech.co.za/news/lifestyle/121393/the-truth-about-black-vs-white-land-and-home-ownership-in-sa/https://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/who-owns-sas-land-20171028The above references conclusively prove substantial black land ownership.Africans do not learn from their mistakes.

I have answered similar questions earlier and would like the readers to revisit them for references , here I would like to summarise the issue once again to share my view why Modi government is being criticised .i would like the readers to revisit the speech given by PM on the night of 8 th November 2016 when he announced Demonetization , the following were 3 goal posts clearly defined by him in his speech .goalposts were : a . To remove unaccounted for cash IE black money from system. B. To remove Fake Indian currency in circulation from the system. C. To crush down terror funding across different part of the country.now I would like the readers to revisit the affidavit and caveat filed in Supreme Court on behalf of the government and it clearly says that to replenish 10 lakh crore it would take time which means government was confident only approx 10 lakh crore is expected to return back,i would also remind readers to check again different statements made by FM and others implying they expect more than 10% of currency in circulation will be scrapped, PM himself on many occasion by his speech and gestures gave an idea of windfall of successbut what is the end result :99.30% of banned currency notes are back and accounted for.it means less than 10.000 crore have gone out of the system.RBI has not counted currency returned in Nepal, Bhutan, Zimbabwe and other places along with Currency returned to District Cooperative banks.it is speculated once the currency at point 3 is accounted the total currency returned would be equal or more than 100%.RBI spent more than 7000 crore in printing , distribution of currency and calibration of ATM.what happened during and after demotization:the sectors which were cash dependent like Farm, small and micro enterprises were crushed because of cash crunch.Lakhs of jobs were lost as owners could not pay because their cash flow stopped.Lakhs of business particularly in unorganised sector shut down as their cash flow was stopped.the GDP growth fell by 2% points.the average export growth fell to 1.5% per annum from peak of 13.6%.144 people died while standing in que to withdraw cash.the real estate sector crashed as labour which was paid in cash could not be paid and returned back to villages.but the price of property has not crashed, nor did the cash component in sale come down, Yes sales came down.what does the above imply :the process was a systematic or institutional method to Launder cash, all unaccounted cash came into system and became WHITE.it was a systematic or institutional method to put unorganised sector out of business and a way to organise LOOT the poor, lower middle class and middle class of Legitemate avenues of business. And employment.It was a institutional way to make space on margins for bigger business to get a toehold .what does the government do or is doing:it is spinning a YARN by claiming that 18 lakh accounts are being scrutinised but just think over it this number is not even 1% of total bank accounts.the number of people filing ITR have increased but the number of people depositing tax has not increased in the same proportion and was disruption in economy by means of Demonetization only way to increase these numbers.what ever portion of economy was in BLACK cash has become WHITE and Legitemate ,this disruption affected poor and Middle class the most, it did not effect or had any effect on rich can be seen from scams which has hit the country since then, The incremental increase in NPA and worse situation in which PSB are today as compared with 2015–2016.increase in digital transaction despite everything the total digital transaction number around 5–7% today .less cash in economy : today the currency in circulation is nearly 110% of the currency when demotization was affected.cash transaction and cash hoarding is back to level which was on 8th Novemer 2016.now why the government should not be criticised left , right and centre for its incompetence and screwing up the happiness of Citizens of this nation by such a quixotic decesion