Form 8081: Fill & Download for Free

I don't completely aggree with the assumption being made in this question.I have never personally been to Kasargod but I have been to the Nilgiris. I was very young back then (7 or 8 yo) so I don't think it counts.To answer the question, they are not exactly Kannada regions.Let us look at the linguistic population census of 2011.Kasargod district, keralaLet us have a look at the census data. Note that this is district wise data.Kannadigas - 55,263Malayalees - 10,81,126Tuluvas - 1,14,671Konkanis - 16,856There is a very clear Malaylam speaking majority in Kasargod (taking the entire district as a unit).But it is really hard to ignore the large number of Tuluvas and Kannadigas in the district. The Tuluvas outnumber Kannadigas two to one. The towns and villages closer to south canara district have a Tulu majority with a significant Kannada /Malayalam/ konkani minority.It can be said that the northwestern part of the district has a significant Kannadiga presence but I highly doubt that any of the towns/villages have a Kannada speaking majority.The names of some towns are in Kannada, yes but that doesn't mean that they have a kannada majority. The towns were named during a kannada rule, since the ruler normally gets to name the places he/she will obviously use his/her own language to name it.It is definitely a stupid thing to say that Kasargod is a Kannada majority region.The Nilgiris, Tamil NaduEven here, the best way of solving this problem is to look at the census.Kannadigas - 1,79,795Kannadigas : 48,967Badagas (Kannadigas) : 1,22,441Kurumbas: 5,038Tamilians: 3,64,909 (Irular mozhi : 7904)Malayalees: 1,31,832Telugus: 26,708Urdu speakers (Deccan Muslims): 11876It is obvious that this district is fairly diverse. Five languages have a significant presence here with a Tamil majority.But some observations can be made:Tamilians outnumber everyone.Tamilians outnumber kannadigas and Malayalees two to one.There is a significant kannadiga presence here. In fact, kannadigas are the second largest linguistic group there.Other dialects of kannada are spoken more than the mainstream kannada.Badaga dialect speakers outnumber mainstream kannada speakers two to one.The entire district is a hilly region.The main problem here is that there is a dispute over whether Badaga is a dialect of Kannada.Badagas were the Kannada people who migrated from the kannada speaking lands to Tamil speaking lands centuries ago. They slowly mixed their kannada with Tamil. That is how Badaga came into being.Currently Badaga is written in Tamil script more than Kannada.So with a significant population of Badagas, some part of the Nilgiris can be called “Kannada lands". But again a large part of the Nilgiris district is a protected forest area. Even if the Badaga lands were added to karnataka it would be of no use because they (Badagas) prefer living isolated.Coming to kannadigas, they are mostly urban dwellers which are Tamil majority places.So even here it would be again wrong to call the whole Nilgiris district “Kannada Land".The reason these places were added to the respective states was because entire districts were taken as single units for bifurcation in most cases.Except some areas which form the present district of Chamarajanagara, almost the entire district of Coimbatore was added to Tamil Nadu and the entire Malabar district was added to Kerala.The demands of Tuluvas were ignored and the entire existance of Badaga community was overlooked.So I guess these were the major reasons for giving these “Kannada regions" to the respective states.Some people may say that the Kannadigas of Tamil Nadu and Kerala have reported themselves in the census as Tamilians or Malayalees.I can partially aggree with that in the case of T.N because the 2011 census indicates that the number of Kannadigas in T.N and Maharashtra has gone down by 2 lakhs each when compared to the 2001 census. This isn't true for kerala where an increase has been seen.According to me this kind of misreporting is really significant. The decrease in the number of Kannadigas may be because of several factors such as migration and naturalization.Some people claim that the census is influenced by the respective state governments. I can't talk much about that because I am not personally aware of such modification. I can say that it is happening but to what extent, I don't know.Thanks for reading.Edit:I couldn't find the official link of the 1951 census for district wise data. I only found newspaper articles which did not provide complete information. That's why I went with 2011 census which is mostly reliable.Edit 2:Reliability of the census:I know that this is not completely reliable and has some unusual amount of discrepancy in some areas. I agree that the respective state government has some influence on the census.What we have to specially consider is the people themselves reporting their mother tongue as Tamil/Malayalam instead of kannada. I believe that there are a huge number of cases like this. Here is an example.The census gives us a rough idea of the demographic in an area and not the exact numbers.Edit 3:I could find the official link to the census of 1951. But remember that the composition of the districts was vastly different back then and the census also doesn't give you town/sub district wise data.Refer to section D1.Neelgiri district: http://lsi.gov.in:8081/jspui/bitstream/123456789/6437/1/49372_1951_NIL.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwj3kPP5irHtAhVEAXIKHUzqAWsQFjAAegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw3ux5KNE0nGPfayYUWje4psKasargode district:http://lsi.gov.in:8081/jspui/bitstream/123456789/5757/1/51134_1981_KAS.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjji8SKjLHtAhWVe30KHUL2AXwQFjAEegQIChAC&usg=AOvVaw3rpsnQWNu30N2Ib7AIDVfpFootnotes :Badaga language - WikipediaBadagas - WikipediaOffice of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, IndiaBadaga language not a dialect of Kannada, claims French linguistic scholar | Coimbatore News - Times of India

We have an article on our developer blog which may be useful to some. It describes 6loWPAN and compares it against things like ZigBee and DASH7.http://www.wigwag.com/devblog/whats-6lowpan-tutorial/(As with anything, these are our opinions. So form your own...)The biggest difference in 6loWPAN and ZigBee (if your comparing 802.15.4 based protocols) beyond the fact that one is IETF guided and is IP based, is stack size. ZigBee is complex, and this has both positives and negatives. Also bear in mind ZigBee 2.0, as mentioned above, has an IP layer built in.Here is a ZigBee Alliance presentation discussing some of this:http://labs.chinamobile.com:8081/attachments/wiise/MiracleW-3.pdfZ-Wave is proprietary, and controlled by one company. See the blog article for more.

The easiest option is to set the rails server port to 80. You can edit the configs to listen on port 80. This is the easiest set up and most memory economical.However, I see that you wan to set up the app at <domain>/myapp . Perhaps there is another process listening on port 80 running on the same server. In this case, you need to configure that process(it can be apache webrick or tomcat or anything) to redirect /myapp to rails servers.If you already have Apache, or in case you can install apache for handling port 80. Do the following things :Enable the proxy and proxy_http mods of apache usingsudo a2enmod proxy sudo a2enmod proxy_http Include two directives in your httpd.conf file for each web application that you wish to forward to Rails. For example, to forward an application at context path /myapp:ProxyPass /myapp http://localhost:3000  ProxyPassReverse /myapp http://localhost:3000 which tells Apache to forward URLs of the form port 80 to the rails server listening on port 8081.You need to restart apache with sudo service apache2 restartYou may then wish to prevent external connections to rails server by binding rails server only to 127.0.0.1 .