Rule 11 Agreement Pdf: Fill & Download for Free

This work is done with a long-term plan and targeted use of government machinery. Taking note of some developments, the implementation of the year-old plan of BJP and RSS is clearly visible. Our Kashmiri journalist brothers had paid attention to this long ago, but we did not realize that the BJP will show political will in this way. The talk started with the Modi government forming the government at the center in 2014-1. Ram Madhav and Ajit Doval, who came to BJP from RSS, regularly visit Kashmir.2. There was an attempt to break the PDP and NC in the valley, in which the BJP could not succeed.3. By this time, the Congress was considering itself as strong in Jammu, so the BJP's plan to sabotage is not effective.4. Congress could not get NC vote in Lok Sabha elections in Jammu, which followed the 'Ekla Chalo' policy in the Assembly, somewhere and keeping in mind the Anti India Kashmiri voters, NC and Congress also took this decision mutually .5. BJP started strengthening its cadre in Jammu and Ladakh, as well as rumors spread through local newspapers that NC may support BJP after elections. Which benefited PDP.6. The BJP wanted to win the PDP in the valley as it was difficult to find a moral reason for breaking the alliance in the event of an alliance with Abdullah.7. Results came as planned, BJP tried its best to break PDP which failed. Finally a coalition government was formed.8. Running the government properly with PDP, for the first time BJP established back channel liaison with the PDP's strong leaders including Raj Bhavan and Chief Minister's Office.9. During this time the bureaucracy was brought under control, and the way of Governor's rule was cleared.10. There are also reports that the BJP continued to talk inside with the separatist leaders and began to cash in on the anger against the two families in the valley.11. By winning the second time in the Lok Sabha, the BJP had prepared the ground, the green signal of the RSS had been found. A Home Minister with the political will, the iron was hot and the BJP stamped the verdict, correcting all rumors.The separatist leaders were in jail, yet why was there no major movement when it used to happen earlier? Because the separatists had already been accommodated, the separatists showed their benefits in this decision, the leaders of PDF and NC had also been accommodated.There are also reports in the valley that the Jammu leaders of the Congress and the Bhim Army (Panthers Party) were aware of this and Shah and Jeetendra Singh made personal agreements with them. Not only this, the money trace with the government after demonetization in the Valley and Jammu was also used extensively for blackmailing.Now the valley wants to come out of this 70-year drama, Kashmiri boys are directly taking interest in the central government's schemes and are also welcoming and criticizing them. Any decision of the Center is being compared to the previous government, and if some Kashmiri friends believe it is now considered a permanent solution in Kashmir.

In California, PG&E Electric Rule No. 11, Discontinuance and Restoration of Service, says:Monthly bills for residential service are due and payable upon presentation and will be considered past due if payment is not received by PG&E within 19 days after the bill is mailed to the customer.When the customer has received a 15-day notice of termination and fails to comply with the Extension Agreement*, the notice of termination will remainin effect, and collection action will continue. When the customer has received a 48-hour notice of termination and fails to comply with the Extension Agreement, the notice of termination will remain in effect, and any and all services the customer is receiving may be terminated without further notice.In other words, payment due 19 days after mailing + 15-day notice = as little as 34 days from the date the bill is mailed to shutoff.* PG&E offers customers the opportunity to work out an agreement extending shutoffwww.pge.com/tariffs/tm2/pdf/ELEC_RULES_11.pdf

Denial Of The HolodomorPhoto credit: Alexander WienerbergerThe last Saturday in November, Holodomor Remembrance Day, honors the millions of Ukrainians who died of forced starvation at the hands of the Soviets in the 1930s.[1] Some 80 years later, and a quarter-century after the Soviet Union’s dissolution, the Russian government still denies that this atrocity constitutes a “genocide.”[2]Holodomor means “death by hunger,” formed from 2 words in Ukrainian: “holod” meaning hunger or starvation, depending on context; and “mor” meaning death or plague.[3] It is likely that the word derives from the expression “moryty holodom” which means “to inflict death by hunger.”[4] That’s exactly what happened to the people of Soviet Ukraine and primarily ethnically Ukrainian areas in the Northern Caucasus from 1932 to 1933, during a famine masterminded by Joseph Stalin.The Ukrainian independence movement actually predated the Stalin era. Ukraine, which measures about the size of France, had been under the domination of the Imperial Czars of Russia for 200 years.[5] With the collapse of the Czarist rule in March 1917, it seemed the long-awaited opportunity for independence had finally arrived. Optimistic Ukrainians declared their country to be an independent People's Republic and re-established the ancient capital city of Kiev as the seat of government.[6]The Hunt for Ukraine’s Toppled Lenin StatuesHowever, their new-found freedom was short-lived. By the end of 1917, Vladimir Lenin, the first leader of the Soviet Union, sought to reclaim all of the areas formerly controlled by the Czars, especially the fertile Ukraine.[7] As a result, four years of chaos and conflict followed in which Ukrainian national troops fought against Lenin's Red Army, and also against Russia's White Army (troops still loyal to the Czar) as well as other invading forces including the Germans and Poles.[8]By 1921, the battles ended with a Soviet victory while the western part of the Ukraine was divided-up among Poland, Romania, and Czechoslovakia. The Soviets immediately began shipping out huge amounts of grain to feed the hungry people of Moscow and other big Russian cities.[9] Coincidentally, a drought occurred in the Ukraine, resulting in widespread starvation and a surge of popular resentment against Lenin and the Soviets.[10]A family with starving children 1921 (The Holodomor: Stalin's Genocidal Famine that Starved Millions in the 1930s)At the time of the famine, many witnesses recorded the tragedy, and some of them even hinted at its criminal nature.[11] But the passage of time dulled the memory of succeeding generations, and subsequent publications dealing with Ukraine and the Soviet Union said little of substance about this particular disaster.[12] This event, the first man-made famine in the Ukraine, set the stage for the catastrophic famine of 1932–1933.To lessen the deepening resentment, Lenin eased martial law throughout the Ukraine, restricted the export so much grain, and even encouraged a free-market exchange of goods.[13] Subsequently, people's burgeoning interest in independence facilitated a national revival movement celebrating their unique folk customs, language, poetry, music, arts, and Ukrainian orthodox religion.Joseph Stalin in an authorised image taken in 1937 and used for state publicity purposes (Joseph Stalin - WikipediaWhen Lenin died in 1924, he was succeeded by Joseph Stalin, one of the most ruthless humans ever to hold power. To Stalin, the burgeoning national revival movement and continuing loss of Soviet influence in the Ukraine was completely unacceptable. [14] To reassurt Soviet dominance, he employed the same methods he had successfully used within the Soviet Union.In 1928, Stalin introduced a program of agricultural collectivization that forced farmers to give up their private land, equipment and livestock, and join state owned, factory-like collective farms. Stalin decided that collective farms would not only feed the industrial workers in the cities but could also provide a substantial amount of grain to be sold abroad, with the money used to finance his industrialization plans.[15]Many Ukrainian farmers, staunch advocates for independence, refused to join the collective farms, which they considered a return to the serfdom of earlier centuries. In response, Stalin introduced a policy of “class warfare” in the countryside in order to break down resistance to collectivization.[16] The successful farmers, or kurkuls, (kuraks, in Russian) were branded as the class enemy. Brutal enforcement by regular troops and secret police were implemented to “liquidate them as a class.”[17]Who were the kulaks? + ExampleThe publication of Joseph Stalin’s article “The Year of the Great Break” in 1929, marked the start of the Ukrainian genocide.[18] Beginning in 1929, over 5,000 Ukrainian scholars, scientists, cultural and religious leaders were arrested after being falsely accused of plotting an armed revolt.[19] According to the Ukrainian Quarterly of Autumn 1948, 51,713 intellectuals were sent to Siberia in 1931.[20] It is conservatively estimated that at least 75 percent of the Ukrainian intellectuals and professional men in Western Ukraine, Carpatho–Ukraine and Bukovina have been brutally exterminated by the Russians.[21]Those arrested were either shot without a trial or deported to prison camps in remote areas of Russia. The deportations culminated in the devastating forced famine that killed millions more innocent individuals.After the year of mass starvation, the genocide continued for several more years with the further destruction of Ukraine’s political leadership, the resettlement of Ukraine’s depopulated areas with other ethnic groups, the prosecution of those who dared to speak of the famine publicly, and the consistent blatant denial of famine by the Soviet regime.[22]CollectivizationBy mid 1932, nearly 75 percent of the farms in the Ukraine had been forcibly collectivized.[23]Wth the opening of Soviet archives to public, Soviet direction of the “famine” undeniable. In a December 1932 directive, Communist officials ordered regions placed on the “black list” to endure the “immediate cessation of delivery of goods” and the “complete suspension of cooperative and state trade,” including “farm trade.”[24] The abundant crops Ukraine had produced were requisitioned or sometimes left to rot. Soldiers ransacked whole villages for their edible goods before blockading their residents and denying them the right to buy food.[25]On Stalin's orders, mandatory quotas of foodstuffs to be shipped out to the Soviet Union were drastically increased in August, October and again in January 1933.[26] Small stockpiles of supplies were unable to feed the already starving people of the Ukraine.A corpse of a Famine Victimon the streets of Kharkiv, 1933 (1933 Ukrainian Famine Photos from Ammnede's 1936 'Human Life in Russia'.)Much of the hugely abundant wheat crop harvested by the Ukrainians that year was dumped on the foreign market to generate cash to aid Stalin's Five Year Plan for the modernization of the Soviet Union and also to help finance his massive military buildup.[27] If the wheat had remained in the Ukraine, it was estimated to have been enough to feed all of the people there for up to two years.Holodomor (Ukraine) " World Without Genocide -Ukrainian Communists urgently appealed to Moscow for a reduction in the grain quotas and also asked for emergency food aid. Stalin responded by denouncing them and rushed in over 100,000 fiercely loyal Russian soldiers to purge the Ukrainian Communist Party.[28] The Soviets then sealed off the borders of the Ukraine, preventing any food from entering, in effect turning the country into a gigantic concentration camp.[29]Soviet police troops inside the Ukraine also went house to house seizing any stored up food, leaving farm families without a morsel. All food was considered to be the "sacred" property of the State. Anyone caught stealing State property, even an ear of corn or stubble of wheat, could be shot or imprisoned for not less than ten years.[30]Starvation quickly ensued throughout the Ukraine, with the most vulnerable, children and the elderly, first feeling the effects of malnutrition. The once-smiling young faces of children vanished forever amid the constant pain of hunger. It gnawed away at their bellies, which became grossly swollen, while their arms and legs became like sticks as they slowly starved to death.Ukrainian refugees from the 1932-33 famine (Commentary: Ukraine's Never-Ending Trauma)Mothers in the countryside sometimes tossed their emaciated children onto passing railroad cars traveling toward cities such as Kiev in the hope someone there would take pity.[31] But in the cities, children and adults who had already flocked there from the countryside were dropping dead in the streets, with their bodies carted away in horse-drawn wagons to be dumped in mass graves.[32] Occasionally, people lying on the sidewalk who were thought to be dead, but were actually still alive, were also carted away and buried.Survival was a moral as well as a physical struggle. A woman doctor wrote to a friend in June 1933 that she had not yet become a cannibal, but was “not sure that I shall not be one by the time my letter reaches you.” The good people died first. Those who refused to steal or to prostitute themselves died. Those who gave food to others died. Those who refused to eat corpses died. Those who refused to kill their fellow man died. Parents who resisted cannibalism died before their children did.[33]While police and Communist Party officials remained quite well fed, desperate Ukrainians ate leaves off bushes and trees, killed dogs, cats, frogs, mice and birds then cooked them. Others, gone mad with hunger, resorted to cannibalism, with parents sometimes even eating their own children.[34]Ukraine Democracy InitiativeMeanwhile, nearby Soviet-controlled granaries were said to be bursting at the seams from huge stocks of 'reserve' grain, which had not yet been shipped out of the Ukraine.[35] In some locations, grain and potatoes were piled in the open, protected by barbed wire and armed GPU guards who shot down anyone attempting to take the food.[36] Farm animals, considered necessary for production, were allowed to be fed, while the people living among them had absolutely nothing to eat.At the time of the Holodomor, journalists, diplomats, and other observers could only guess at the numbers of victims, and estimates varied from 1.5 to over 10 million. Officially, the Soviet government denied that the famine occurred, and death records could not list starvation as a cause death.[37] Later, scholars were hampered by such falsified and inaccessible records and by the criminalization of famine memory.As many as 25,000 people died every day during the famine.[38] Initial estimates of the death toll by scholars and government officials vary greatly. In the first large-scale academic study of the famine, the 1986 Harvest of Despair, Robert Conquest estimated 5 million deaths from famine for the period 1932-33 in Ukraine.[39] More recently, demographers with better access to records and with the latest acceptable demographic methods have estimated that specifically for the years 1932-1934, specifically within the borders of Soviet Ukraine, nearly 4 million people died of famine related causes (not counting average annual deaths.)[40] Adding the unborn to this total yields 4.5 million.What is especially shocking is how such a great number of people succumbed over a very brief period of time: 2 million persons in just 3 months: May-July 1933; 28,000 per day in June of 1933. [41] According to higher estimates, up to 12 million ethnic Ukrainians were said to have perished as a result of the famine.[42] A U.N. joint statement signed by 25 countries in 2003 declared that 7–10 million perished.In the former Soviet Union millions of men, women and children fell victims to the cruel actions and policies of the totalitarian regime. The Great Famine of 1932–1933 in Ukraine (Holodomor), which took from 7 million to 10 million innocent lives and became a national tragedy for the Ukrainian people. ... as a result of civil war and forced collectivization, leaving deep scars in the consciousness of future generations. ... we deplore the acts and policies that brought about mass starvation and death of millions of people. We do not want to settle scores with the past, it could not be changed, but we are convinced that exposing violations of human rights, preserving historical records and restoring the dignity of victims through acknowledgement of their suffering, will guide future societies and help to avoid similar catastrophes in the future. ...[43]Research has since narrowed the estimates to between 3.3 and 7.5 million.[44] According to the findings of the Court of Appeal of Kiev, in 2010, the demographic losses due to the famine amounted to 10 million, with 3.9 million direct famine deaths, and a further 6.1 million birth deficit.[45]As far as the Soviet Union was concerned, the death of around four million Ukrainians was either propaganda or mass delusion.[46] During the Holodomor, Ukraine was essentially isolated from the world, as borders remained sealed. The Western world didn’t know the full extent of the famine and genocide until it was too late.[47] The few survivors who managed to escape Ukraine after the famine compiled their stories into an archive that was immediately dismissed.[48]Denial of the famine by Soviet authorities was echoed at the time of the famine by some prominent Western journalists, like Walter Duranty.“Any report of a famine in Russia is today an exaggeration or malignant propaganda. There is no actual starvation or deaths from starvation but there is widespread mortality from diseases due to malnutrition.”(as reported by the New York Times correspondent and Pulitzer-prize winner Walter Duranty)[49]The Soviet Union adamantly refused any outside assistance because the regime officially denied that there was any famine.[50] Anyone claiming the contrary was accused of spreading anti-Soviet propaganda. Outside the Soviet Union, Western governments adopted a passive attitude toward the famine, although most of them had become aware of the true suffering in Ukraine through confidential diplomatic channels.[51]Josef Stalin and Franklin Roosevelt atthe Tehran Conference, 1943 (On This Day: United States and Soviet Union Establish Diplomatic Relations)In fact, in November 1933, the United States, under newly elected president Franklin D. Roosevelt, chose to formally recognize Stalin’s Communist government and also negotiated a sweeping new trade agreement.[52] The following year, the pattern of denial in the West culminated with the admission of the Soviet Union into the League of Nations.[53] Stalin’s Five-Year Plans for the modernization of the Soviet Union depended largely on the purchase of massive amounts of manufactured goods and technology from Western nations.[54] Those nations were unwilling to disrupt lucrative trade agreements with the Soviet Union in order to pursue the matter of the famine.It wasn’t until the anniversary of the famine in 1983 that Western scholars began to look more closely at the events of the Holodomor.[55] Even then, denial was rampant. It was endlessly debated whether the Holodomor had been a conscious attack on the Ukraine or just a consequence of policy gone wrong.In 1988, American historian James Mace compiled volumes of information on the Holodomor that finally forced people to confront the reality of this tragic occurrence in Ukraine’s history.[56] Although the Holodomor could no longer be dismissed as a fabrication of Ukrainian refugees, the millions of Ukrainian deaths from the famine were only written into the history books after Ukraine gained its independence in 1991.[57]In Soviet Ukraine, of course, the Holodomor was kept out of official discourse until the late 1980’s, shortly before Ukraine won its independence in 1991.[58] With the fall of the Soviet Union, previously inaccessible archives, as well as the long suppressed oral testimony of Holodomor survivors living in Ukraine, have yielded massive evidence offering incontrovertible proof of Ukraine’s tragic famine genocide of the 1930’s.On November 28th 2006, the Parliament of Ukraine passed a decree defining the Holodomor as a deliberate Act of Genocide.[59] Although the Russian government continues to call Ukraine’s depiction of the famine a “one-sided falsification of history,”[60] it is recognized as genocide by approximately two dozen nations, and is now the focus of considerable international research and documentation.The first thing Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich did after his February 25 2010 inauguration was delete the link to the Holodomor on the president’s official Web site. [61] Yanukovich’s predecessor, Viktor Yushchenko, had made the Holodomor—the famine of 1932–33 produced by Joseph Stalin and responsible for the deaths of millions of Ukrainian peasants—into a national issue, promoting what Czech novelist Milan Kundera famously called “the struggle of memory over forgetting” as part of his attempt to move the country toward democracy.[62] That Yanukovich turned his back so dramatically on this movement to rehabilitate Ukraine’s tragic past indicated the extent to which the recent election was as much about identity as it was about politics.As recent as 2017, the Russian government continues to deny the extent of the Holodomor and their role in creating a policy driven famine and genocide.In 2017, Russian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova told the international press that the Ukrainian government’s use of the phrase “the genocide of Ukrainians” is “politically charged” and “contradicts historical facts.”Furthermore, the U.S. State Department’s statement calling the Holodomor a “Soviet-manufactured tragedy” allegedly “disparaged the memory of the victims of that famine who belonged to other ethnic groups.” She described the Holodomor as merely the result of “severe drought and forced [farm] collectivization” which “hit Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, the Volga region, the North Caucasus, West Siberia and the South Urals.” Thus, Zakharova perfectly illustrated why the State Department condemned “efforts to deny it as a historical fact.”[63]Footnotes[1] Holodomor Remembrance Day: Why the Past Matters for the Future[2] Russia still denies the Holodomor was ‘genocide’[3] Holodomor - Wikipedia[4] Memory, Conflict and New Media[5] The Ukrainian Crisis: In Russia's Long Shadow[6] The Ukrainian Revolution of 1917 and why it matters for historians of the Russian revolution(s) |[7] The Hunt for Ukraine’s Toppled Lenin Statues[8] Ukrainian War of Independence - Wikipedia[9] https://www.jstor.org/stable/41035958?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents[10] The first man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine 1921-1923 (11/06/88)[11] Eyewitness Accounts[12] The first man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine 1921-1923 (11/06/88)[13] The 'Law' of Diminishing Returns[14] http://acienciala.faculty.ku.edu/communistnationssince1917/ch3.html[15] Collectivization in the USSR: How the Russian peasantry was smashed[16] Genocide in the 20th Century: Stalin's Forced Famine 1932-33[17] Liquidation of the Kulaks[18] Depression Stalinism: The Great Break Reconsidered[19] Stalin in Control[20] SOVIET GENOCIDE IN UKRAINE[21] Why the deadly famine occurred, or comprehending the Ukrainian Holodomor[22] Red Famine by Anne Applebaum review – did Stalin deliberately let Ukraine starve? [23] Holodomor 1932-33: Famine genocide in Ukraine Information website[24] Grain problem[25] 100 years of false religion[26] Holodomor (Ukraine) " World Without Genocide -[27] The Results of the First Five-Year Plan[28] The Ukrainian Week[29] Seven million died in the 'forgotten' holocaust[30] Devastation[31] Grappling With Holodomor[32] https://www.jstor.org/stable/23611464?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents[33] Grappling With Holodomor[34] From The Archive: Famine Survivors Recall Horrors[35] https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.economics-sociology.eu/files/14_20_Nefedov.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjyq8WokN3fAhUixoMKHXT9CjAQFjALegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw1ATmUDHFFgYurWLMtP1l5b[36] Holodomor: The Secret Holocaust in Ukraine[37] Holocaust by hunger: The truth behind Stalin's Great Famine[38] So how many Ukrainians died in the Holodomor? |[39] 'HARVEST OF DESPAIR' BARES SOVIET POLICIES, INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL, FOR WHAT THEY ARE[40] Commentary: Ukraine's Never-Ending Trauma[41] So how many Ukrainians died in the Holodomor? |[42] http://Wheatcroft, Stephen G. (2001a). "Current knowledge of the level and nature of mortality in the Ukrainian famine of 1931–3" (PDF). [43] http://repository.un.org/bitstream/handle/11176/246001/A_C.3_58_9-EN.pdf[44] http://Snyder, Timothy (2010). Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin. London: The Bodley Head. [45] http://Rosefielde, Steven (1983). "Excess Mortality in the Soviet Union: A Reconsideration of the Demographic Consequences of Forced Industrialization, 1929–1949". Soviet Studies. 35(3): 385–409. [46] Holodomor: World Reaction, Propaganda and the Media[47] How Stalin Hid Ukraine's Famine From the World[48] Commentary: Ukraine's Never-Ending Trauma[49] New York Times Statement About 1932 Pulitzer Prize Awarded to Walter Duranty | The New York Times Company[50] Holodomor - RationalWiki[51] Education - Holodomor Research and Education Consortium[52] 'Roosevelt and Stalin' details the surprisingly warm relationship of an unlikely duo[53] USSR joins the League of Nations[54] 83 years ago: The Soviet Union joined the League of Nations[55] USSR joins the League of Nations[56] Deleting the Holodomor: Ukraine Unmakes Itself[57] Holodomor (Ukraine) " World Without Genocide -[58] Historian Anne Applebaum Details Stalin's War Against Ukraine: 'I Believe It Was Genocide'[59] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/28/AR2006112800658_pf.html[60] History, Identity and Holodomor Denial: Russia’s continued assault on Ukraine | EUROMAIDAN PRESS[61] Deleting the Holodomor: Ukraine Unmakes Itself[62] Deleting the Holodomor: Ukraine Unmakes Itself[63] Marking the 84th Anniversary of the Ukrainian Holodomor