W 4 Espanol 2005: Fill & Download for Free

Let's take a look to see if this Bruce Metzger is correct. Are they any translations that has Yehovah/Jehovah written in New Testament? Are there any NT manuscripts that has Yehovah/Jehovah written within them?Tetragrammaton in the NT text:Jehowahwithin Symon Budny's translationof the New Testament (1574) /Το Τετραγράμματο στο κείμενο της ΚΔ:Το όνομα Ιεχωβάστη μετάφραση της Καινή Διαθήκηςτου Σίμωνος Βουδναίου (1574)Symon Budny / Σίμων Βουδναίος,Nowy Testament znowu przełożony, 1574,Matthew 1:17-24.If you notice this is much earlier then the 1611 KJV.Tetragrammaton in the NT text: Jehowah within Symon Budny's translation of the New Testament (1574) /Το Τετραγράμματο στο κείμενο της ΚΔ: Το όνομα Ιεχωβά στη μετάφραση της Καινή Διαθήκης του Σίμωνος Βουδναίου (1574)23 CATHOLIC translations of the NT with YHWHLANGUAGE /TRANSLATOR /FUNCTION /FORM /NUMBER1. HEBREW Georg Mayr 1622? Jesuit יהוה  221 times (NT)2. HEBREW Giovanni Battista Jona# 1639/1668 Rev. יהוה  70 times (Four Gospels)3. GERMAN Eulogius Schneider 1788 Franciscan Jehovah 1 time (John)4. GERMAN Sebastian Mutschelle 1789-1790 Jesuit Jehovah 17 times (NT)5. GERMAN Johann Georg Krach 1790 Rev. Jehova 1 time (NT)6. GERMAN Dominikus von Brentano 1794 Rev. Jehovah 4 times (NT)7. DUTCH Willem Antony van Vloten 1795-1796 Rev. Jehovah 161 times (NT)8. GERMAN Matthäus Schabet 1796 Rev. Jehova 2 time (Four Gospels)9. GERMAN Adam Joseph Onymus 1805 Rev. Jehova 4 time (Four Gospels)10. GERMAN Johann Balthasar Gerhauser 1808 Rev. Jehovah 11 times (Romans)11. CROATIAN Ivan Matija Škarić 1858-1861 Rev. Jehova 13 times* (NT)12. PORTUGUESE Manuel Fernandes de Santanna 1909 Jesuit Iáhve ? times (Matthew)13. GERMAN Peter Dausch 1918 Rev. Jahwe 1 time (NT)14. HEBREW Jean-Marie Paul Bauchet 1923 Carmelit יהוה  18 times (Matthew)15. ENGLISH John W. C. Wand 1944 Bishop Jehovah 7 times (Letters of NT)16. SPANISH Sebastián Bartina 1962 Jesuit Yahvé 1 time (NT)17. SPANISH Hermenegildo Zanuso 1969, 1973 Rev. Yahvé ? times (NT)18. POLISH Roman Brandstaetter# 1984 writer Jahwe 2 times (Acts)19. FRENCH Claude Tresmontant 1991, 2008 theologian yhwh 87 times (Gospels, Rev)20. ENGLISH Craig R. Smith 1994 Rev. Yahweh 31 times (NT)21. SPANISHJosé Alonso Díaz 1996 SalesianAntonio Vargas-Machuca 1996 JesuitYahveh 1 time (Mt,Mk,Lk)22. HEBREWJacob Barclay 2005 BishopMassimo Pazzini 2005 FranciscanYHWH 175 times(NT) (יהוה)23. SPANISH ? Biblia Peshitta en Español 2006 ? Yahweh 125 times (NT)408665151-Grzegorz-Kaszyński-23-Catholic-NT-with-YHWH.pdfNotice this older Hebrew manuscripts of the Gospel of Luke. Written within it is in the Divine Name Yehovah/Jehovah. Nehemia GordonAlso, the historical literary evidence indicates that the early church fathers believed that Matthew originally wrote his gospel in Hebrew (Aramaic) and then wrote a Greek translation. Hebrew MatthewBible scholar Nehemia Gordon has done some work on this topic.He has found the Divine Name Yehovah/Jehovah written within these Hebrew manuscripts. My Search for Hebrew New Testament Manuscripts - Nehemia Gordon

NO. The oceans reflect BUT LAG the impact of solar cycles and thus they are also cyclical. Many have been fooled by the El Nino warming ocean currents that has come to an end. The oceans are cooling just like the atmosphere and the blank sun.REFERENCESMajor Greenland Glacier Is GrowingJune 6, 2019JPEGJakobshavn Glacier in western Greenland is notorious for being the world’s fastest-moving glacier. It is also one of the most active, discharging a tremendous amount of ice from the Greenland Ice Sheet into Ilulissat Icefjord and adjacent Disko Bay—with implications for sea level rise. The image above, acquired on June 6, 2019, by the Operational Land Imager (OLI) on Landsat 8, shows a natural-color view of the glacier.Jakobshavn has spent decades in retreat—that is, until scientists observed an unexpected advance between 2016 and 2017. In addition to growing toward the ocean, the glacier was found to be slowing and thickening. New data collected in March 2019 confirm that the glacier has grown for the third year in a row, and scientists attribute the change to cool ocean waters.“The third straight year of thickening of Greenland’s biggest glacier supports our conclusion that the ocean is the culprit,” said Josh Willis, an ocean scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and principal investigator of the Oceans Melting Greenland (OMG) mission.2016 - 2019JPEGThe maps above show how the glacier’s height changed between March 2016 and 2017 (top); March 2017 and 2018 (middle); and March 2018 and 2019 (bottom). The elevation data come from a radar altimeter that has been flown on research airplanes each spring as part of OMG. Blue areas represent where the glacier’s height has increased, in some areas by as much as 30 meters per year.The change is particularly striking at the glacier’s front (solid blue area on the left) between 2016 and 2017. That’s when the glacier advanced the most, replacing open water and sea ice with towering glacial ice. The glacier has not advanced as much since then, but it continues to slow and thicken.Willis compared the glacier’s behavior to silly putty. “Pull it from one end and it stretches and gets thinner, or squash it together and it gets thicker,” he said. The latter scenario is what is happening now as the glacier slows down: Notice that by the third year, thickening is occurring across an increasingly wide area.Willis and colleagues think the glacier is reacting to a shift in a climate pattern called the North Atlantic Oscillation, which has brought cold water northward along Greenland’s west coast. Measurements of the temperatures collected by the OMG team show that the cold water has persisted.“Even three years after the cold water arrived, the glacier is still reacting,” Willis said. “I’m really excited to go back this August and measure the temperature again. Is it still cold? Or has it warmed back up?”NASA Earth Observatory images by Joshua Stevens, using Landsat data from the U.S. Geological Survey, and data courtesy of Josh Willis/NASA JPL and the Oceans Melting Greenland (OMG) Program. Story by Kathryn Hansen.Major Greenland Glacier Is Growinghttps://notrickszone.com/2017/09/11/12-new-papers-north-atlantic-pacific-and-southern-oceans-are-cooling-as-glaciers-thicken-gain-mass/12 New Papers: North Atlantic, Pacific, And Southern Oceans Are Cooling As Glaciers Thicken, Gain MassBy Kenneth Richard on 11. September 2017Share this...Graph Source Duchez et al., 2016Contrary to expectations, climate scientists continue to report that large regions of the Earth have not been warming in recent decades.According to Dieng et al. (2017), for example, the global oceans underwent a slowdown, a pause, or even a slight cooling trend during 2003 to 2013. This undermines expectations from climate models which presume the increase in radiative forcing from human CO2 emissions should substantially increase ocean temperatures.The authors indicate that the recent trends in ocean temperatures “may just reflect a 60-year natural cycle“, the AMO (Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation), and not follow radiative forcing trends.Dieng et al., 2017 We investigate the global mean and regional change of sea surface and land surface temperature over 2003–2013, using a large number of different data sets, and compare with changes observed over the past few decades (starting in 1950). … While confirming cooling of eastern tropical Pacific during the last decade as reported in several recent studies, our results show that the reduced rate of change of the 2003–2013 time span is a global phenomenon. GMST short-term trends since 1950 computed over successive 11-year windows with 1-year overlap show important decadal variability that highly correlates with 11-year trends of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation index. The GMST 11-year trend distribution is well fitted by a Gaussian function, confirming an unforced origin related to internal climate variability.We evaluate the time derivative of full-depth ocean heat content to determine the planetary energy imbalance with different approaches: in situ measurements, ocean reanalysis and global sea level budget. For 2003–2013, it amounts to 0.5 +/− 0.1 W m−2, 0.68 +/− 0.1 W m−2 and 0.65 +/− 0.1 W m−2, respectively for the three approaches. Although the uncertainty is quite large because of considerable errors in the climate sensitivity parameter, we find no evidence of decrease in net radiative forcing in the recent years, but rather an increase compared to the previous decades.We can note that the correlation between GMST [global mean surface temperature] trends and AMO trends is quite high. It amounts 0.88 over the whole time span. At the beginning of the record, the correlation with PDO trends is also high (equal to 0.8) but breaks down after the mid-1980s. The GMST and AMO trends shown in Figure 6 show a low in the 1960s and high in the 1990s, suggestive of a 60-year oscillation, as reported for the global mean sea level by Chambers et al. (2012). Thus the observed temporal evolution of the GMST [global mean surface temperature] trends may just reflect a 60-year natural cycle driven by the AMO.Subpolar North Atlantic Cooling Rapidly Since 2005According to Piecuch et al. (2017) there has been no net warming of the North Atlantic Ocean in the last quarter century. The warming that occurred in the 10 years from 1994-2004 has been completely negated by an even more pronounced cooling trend since 2005. The predominant (87%) cause of the warming was determined to be of the same natural (non-anthropogenic) origin as the subsequent cooling: advection, the movement/circulation of heat via internal processes. In fact, human CO2 emissions are never mentioned as even contributing to the the 1994-2004 warming.Piecuch et al., 2017 The subpolar North Atlantic (SPNA) is subject to strong decadal variability, with implications for surface climate and its predictability. In 2004–2005, SPNA decadal upper ocean and sea-surface temperature trends reversed from warming during 1994–2004 to cooling over 2005–2015. … Over the last two decades, the SPNA has undergone a pronounced climate shift. Decadal OHC and SST trends reversed sign around 2004–2005, with a strong warming seen during 1994–2004 and marked cooling observed over 2005–2015. These trend reversals were pronounced (> 0.1 °C yr−1 in magnitude) in the northeastern North Atlantic (south and west of Iceland) and in the Labrador Sea. … To identify basic processes controlling SPNA thermal variations, we diagnose the SPNA heat budget using ECCOv4. Changes in the heat content of an oceanic control volume can be caused by convergences and divergences of advective, diffusive, and surface heat fluxes within the control volume. [Advective heat convergence] explains 87% of the total [ocean heat content] variance, the former [warming] showing similar decadal behavior to the latter [cooling], increasing over 1994–2004, and decreasing over 2005–2015. … These results demonstrate that the recent SPNA decadal trend reversal was mostly owing to advective convergences by ocean circulation … decadal variability during 1993–2015 is in largest part related to advection by horizontal gyres.Yeager and Robson (2017) also point out that, like it did from the 1960s to 1980s, the North Atlantic “has again been cooling”, a trend which they and others expect to continue. Sea surface temperatures are no warmer today than they were in the 1950s.Yeager and Robson, 2017 [W]hile the late twentieth century Atlantic was dominated by NAO-driven THC [thermohaline circulation] variability, other mechanisms may dominate in other time periods. … More recently, the SPNA [sub polar North Atlantic] upper ocean has again been cooling, which is also thought to be related to a slowdown in the THC. A continued near-term cooling of the SPNA has been forecast by a number of prediction systems, with implications for pan-Atlantic climate.The Southern Ocean Has Been Cooling Since The 1970s, Contrary To ModelsLatif et al., 2017 The Southern Ocean featured some remarkable changes during the recent decades. For example, large parts of the Southern Ocean, despite rapidly rising atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, depicted a surface cooling since the 1970s, whereas most of the planet has warmed considerably. In contrast, climate models generally simulate Southern Ocean surface warming when driven with observed historical radiative forcing. The mechanisms behind the surface cooling and other prominent changes in the Southern Ocean sector climate during the recent decades, such as expanding sea ice extent, abyssal warming, and CO2 uptake, are still under debate. Observational coverage is sparse, and records are short but rapidly growing, making the Southern Ocean climate system one of the least explored. It is thus difficult to separate current trends from underlying decadal to centennial scale variability.Turney et al., 2017 Occupying about 14% of the world’s surface, the Southern Ocean plays a fundamental role in ocean and atmosphere circulation, carbon cycling and Antarctic ice-sheet dynamics. … As a result of anomalies in the overlying wind, the surrounding waters are strongly influenced by variations in northward Ekman transport of cold fresh subantarctic surface water and anomalous fluxes of sensible and latent heat at the atmosphere–ocean interface. This has produced a cooling trend since 1979.Sea Ice Has Been Expanding For The Entire Southern Hemisphere Since The 1970sComiso et al., 2017 The Antarctic sea ice extent has been slowly increasing contrary to expected trends due to global warming and results from coupled climate models. After a record high extent in 2012 the extent was even higher in 2014 when the magnitude exceeded 20 × 106 km 2for the first time during the satellite era. … [T]he trend in sea ice cover is strongly influenced by the trend in surface temperature [cooling]. … A case study comparing the record high in 2014 with a relatively low ice extent in 2015 also shows strong sensitivity to changes in surface temperature. The results suggest that the positive trend is a consequence of the spatial variability of global trends in surface temperature and that the ability of current climate models to forecast sea ice trend can be improved through better performance in reproducing observed surface temperatures in the Antarctic region.The Pacific Ocean Has Also Been Cooling Since The 1970sLi, 2017 In the Southern Ocean, the increasing trend of the total OHC slowed down and started to decrease from 1980, and it started to increase again after 1995. In the warming context over the whole period [1970-2009], the Pacific was losing heat, especially in the deep water below 1000 m and in the upper layer above 300 m, excluding the surface 20 m layer in which the OHC kept increasing through the time.Glaciers, Ice Sheets Stable, Even Gaining MassGoel et al., 2017 Ice rises are a useful resource to investigate evolution and past climate of the DML coastal region. We investigate Blåskimen Island ice rise, one of the larger isle-type ice rises at the calving front of the intersection of Fimbul and Jelbart Ice Shelves, using geophysical methods. … Using the Input-Output method for a range of parameters and column setups, we conclude that Blåskimen Island has been thickening over the past nine years [2005-2014]. Thickening rates cannot be determined precisely, but ensemble results show that thickening rate averaged over the ice rise varies between 0.07 m a−1 and 0.35 m a−1 [per year]. On longer timescales, we speculate that the summit of Blåskimen Island has been stable within several kilometers at least in the past ∼600 years but no longer than several millennia.Bader et al., 2017 Rather than reflecting major changes in ice flow path over time, the provenance changes are interpreted to indicate relative stability of the East Antarctic ice sheet.Martín-Español et al., 2017 We investigate the mass balance of East Antarctica for 2003–2013 using a Bayesian statistical framework. … We apportion mass trends to SMB and ice dynamics for the EAIS, based on two different assumptions, different remote sensing data and two RCMs. In the first experiment, the model apportions about a third of the mass trend to ice dynamics, +17 Gt/yr, and two thirds, +40 Gt yr−1 to SMB, resulting in a total mass trend for the EAIS [East Antarctic Ice Sheet] of +57 ± 20 Gt yr−1.Bolch et al., 2017 Previous geodetic estimates of mass changes in the Karakoram revealed balanced budgets or a possible slight mass gain since ∼ 2000. Indications of longer-term stability exist but only very few mass budget analyses are available before 2000. Here, based on 1973 Hexagon KH-9, ∼ 2009 ASTER and the SRTM DTM, we show that glaciers in the Hunza River basin (central Karakoram) were on average in balance or showed slight insignificant mass loss within the period ∼ 1973–2009.Predictions Of Future Cooling, Ice ExpansionÅrthun et al., 2017 Statistical regression models show that a significant part of northern climate variability thus can be skillfully predicted up to a decade in advance based on the state of the ocean. Particularly, we predict that Norwegian air temperature will decrease over the coming years, although staying above the long-term (1981–2010) average. Winter Arctic sea ice extent will remain low but with a general increase towards 2020.Pittard et al., 2017 We suggest the Lambert-Amery glacial system will remain stable, or gain ice mass and mitigate a portion of potential future sea level rise over the next 500 years, with a range of +3.6 to -117.5 mm GMSL-equivalent.Share this...Posted in Cooling/Temperature, Glaciers | 41 Responses41 responses to “12 New Papers: North Atlantic, Pacific, And Southern Oceans Are Cooling As Glaciers Thicken, Gain Mass”1.Bitter&twisted 11. September 2017 at 5:38 PM | PermalinkCome on SebastianH- let’s hear the alarmist spin on this.Not really working out as the models predicted, is it?1.SebastianH 12. September 2017 at 1:12 AM | PermalinkDoesn’t look like cooling to me …https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/state-climate-highlights/2016Picking out the blue spots and declaring that oceans are cooling is kind of a selective perception, isn’t it?1.Kenneth Richard 12. September 2017 at 4:22 AM | PermalinkThe authors of the peer-reviewed scientific papers cited in the article do not appear to have gathered their data by gazing at a colorized NOAA graph and then “picking out the blue spots and declaring that oceans are cooling”.According to the scientists, for example, the North Atlantic OHC has been cooling for the last 10+ years for the same reasons that they warmed for the 10 years before that: natural heat redistribution processes. CO2 is not mentioned as a factor in the 10-year warming or the 10-year cooling. The North Atlantic’s sea surface temperatures are cooler now than they were in the 1950s.Same with the Southern Ocean, which occupies “about 14% of the world’s surface”. It’s been cooling for 4 decades, which is largely why the sea ice extent has been growing throughout the SH.Your colorized NOAA map doesn’t show any of this, of course. So does this mean the NOAA graph is right, and scientists publishing papers in peer-reviewed journals are wrong?Why have the Southern Ocean and Pacific Ocean been cooling for multiple decades, SebastianH? What’s the mechanism? What’s the mechanism that caused the North Atlantic to warm up from 1994 to 2004? Do you believe it was CO2 emissions from humans? Assuming you do, why do you believe that?

We cannot be sure because while we have data about the past showing the swings or cycles of warming and cooling, but we cannot predict the weather more than a few days forward so we do not know if the future IS WARMING AND NOT COOLING.We do not live long enough to observe climate change in hundreds or thousands of years. This means the climate trends of the future are unknown and the science about it is not settled.We only observe weather and make statistical averages of the weather over long periods at least centuries to compute numbers for climate. This is a very inexact problem and sadly the alarmist scientists have been guilty of fudging and tampering with the data, therefore the best evidence is from observed reality ie snow, rain, ice and drought. If the later is weak and former strong then the earth is cooling not warming globally.Remember we are in an the Quaternary ice age. [See Wikipedia for details] We should prepare for a cooling earth where there will be early winters with much snowfall and this will cause an snow albedo that will add to the cooling.Only the fact that the climate will oscillate from hot to cold and back in a long cycle is inevitable.Further, we cannot predict the timing or the direction of the oscillations that are baked into climate change cycles. This is the great fallacy of the alarmists who knew their computer models lacked credibility for policy analysis but pushed a political view notwithstanding.Ref.What trends are clear for temperatures?The most obvious is a pause in global warming for the past two decades. Also the evidence is clear the North and South poles are not melting away from too much warming.Extreme Weather GSMBAD NEWS ALARMISTS — OFFICIAL DATA REVEALS ARCTIC SEA ICE IS ONCE AGAIN GROWINGJANUARY 29, 2020 CAP ALLONAccording to official government data from the National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC), Arctic Sea Ice is once again GROWING, with current 2020 levels exceeding 8 out of the previous 10 years.There is nothing catastrophic, alarming, or even a little worrisome about this data, and it comfortably puts to bed the “prophecies of doom” perpetuated on a daily basis across the western media. Very few MSM outlets have fact-checking as a top priority–there is a lot of grandstanding, of course, and paragraphs upon paragraphs on how science + consensuses have –for what would be first time in history– magically combined to deliver an unquestionable truth… HOWEVER, the blinkered exclusion of the below Arctic Sea Ice Extent graph from ANY mainstream climate article should leave you skeptical.Arctic sea ice extent in January 2020 is sitting ABOVE levels observed in the years 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2012 (record low extent), 2011, AND 2010.Can you imagine the likes of The Guardian, for example, ever running with this? The source of the data isn’t some hokey-pokey conspiracy site — it’s America’s NSIDC, who boast being backed-up by NASA–and they have satellites and shit. No, the exclusion of charts like these reveals an agenda, and it should ring alarm bells for those with even the weakest of BS detectors.Perhaps it’s as obvious as ‘doom & gloom headlines = highest click-rate’ (and therefore biggest $$$), rather than some sinister politicized push for world socialism. Or maybe it’s just that the majority of MSM editors are a bunch of woke, gullible hippies.Whatever the reason though –whether it be a callous money-grab or all the way up to some regrettable excuse for a rollout of globalism– it still involves cherry-picking, dishonesty, and fraud…The safest bet is to be your own fact-checker (as best you can), as “blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of the truth” — Albert Einstein.And you can start with the latest Arctic sea ice extent vs the 1981-2010 mean map below.Do 2020’s developments look in any way catastrophic to you…?https://electroverse.net/official-data-reveals-arctic-sea-ice-is-growing-again/Articles GSMOFFICIAL DATA REVEALS JANUARY 2020’S ANTARCTIC SEA ICE EXTENT TRACKED 1979-1990 AVERAGEFEBRUARY 10, 2020 CAP ALLONAccording to official government data from the National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC), Antarctic Sea Ice Extent is currently tracking the 1979-1990 average:nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/charctic-interactive-sea-ice-graph/In addition, Jan 2020’s extent exceeded that of 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2011, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2000, 1997, 1993, 1992, 1988, 1985, 1984, 1981, and 1980.That’s right, Antarctic Sea Ice extent is currently higher NOW than it was in the early 1980s:nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/charctic-interactive-sea-ice-graphNSIDC: “The rate of [seasonal] ice loss slowed considerably over the month of January … extent declined 3.19 million km2, which is slower than the 1981 to 2010 average loss of 3.79 million km2.”https://electroverse.net/jan-2020s-antarctic-sea-ice-extent-on-par-with-1979-90-avg/I published an article in Canada’s National Newspaper THE GLOBE AND MAIL from research about weather trends in 1990. UNCERTAINTY WAS THE THESIS THEN AND NOW.My research at that point underscored: “It is impossible for Canada or France to pass legislation that will change the weather or prevent global warming…Experience indicates that the major problem in accessing environmental dangers is the uncertainty or unpredictabiliey of harm. The views of environmental experts like the famous biochemist Dr. Bruce Ames is instructive. Dr. Ames, who is known for developing the test for the detection of mutagens and potential carcinogens, warns that “jumping to conclucion is bad science. Yet, there is a strong tendency among those involved in the climate debate to do just that.”CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISM IS BAD, UNFOUNDED SCIENCENo climate change can be determined over the last 30 years, must be the only answer because the weather of only 30 years cannot possible be from a long enough time scale to see a new pattern or trend that could be called climate change. The weather produces data that is never linear as you will see in all temperature graphs. This is fundamental climate history and also happens today.Because the climate changes over a long period of time no one living or dead has actually looked out the window and observed climate change. You see weather and it may be a heat wave, snow storm or record rainfall, but one weather event is never a new pattern of changing weather because that must be a statistical analysis.CLIMATE HISTORY FROM BILLIONS OF YEARS AGOWe see the rain, the snow and wind blowing the trees, but this is just weather not climate change.Climate change is any significant long-term change in the expected patterns of average weather of a region (or the whole Earth) over a significant period of time. W.Watching hurricanes and other severe weather is REAL and is over a long time scale the evidence for climate change which is only an unreal statistical fiction. No one living or dead has ever seen climate change. Therefore climate change is an invisible macro phenomena and must be studied through proxies as an indirect science similar to the invisible world of molecules and atoms at the micro level.“What does this mean? First climate science is perhaps the most complex science of all. In fact so far unlike all other physical sciences there is no theory of climate science. There is no climate formula or calculus like E=MC 2 discovered to explain the universe. Does this also mean climate science is so primitive that it is wrong to call it science? Maybe not but what is certain is without the structure of a climate theory scientists like the bunch leading the UN IPCC can make wild claims without falsifiable proof just like astrologists. Their claims cannot be falsified against some E=MC2.”This analysis is sourced from a powerful book, TAKEN BY STORM by Dr. Essex and McKitrick.Here is an example of oscillations showing “US temperature decline” fro USCRN stations.The above chart shows the oscillations of temperature of our ice age climate between the interglacials the are warm and the glaciations that are frigid. Evidence shows the earth is cooling. It is madness to fear global warming as this is necessary to human civilization.What has changed over the past 30 years is more evidence from weather and snow data of a cooling planet with no sign of run away warming. More snowfall has been the key factor observed by most of the world even folks in the Middle East and Australia showing the obvious decline in temperatures. Here is a prediction that as winter comes earlier and snowfall increases the world will relax about the unfounded hypothesis of human caused global warming and come to realize that the much more imminent danger is a return to the Little Ice Age.The Rise and Fall of Central England Temperatures – help needed to find missing dataGuest Blogger / March 4, 2018Guest essay by Tony BrownThis article examines the continued cooling of CET this centuryLooks at a similar scenario of regional cooling in AmericaExamines CET related urbanisation issues, and the current Met office allowances for thisNotes the centuries long general warming of our climate.Notes considerable English seasonal variability over the centuriesExamines the key component parts of the weather that affect the British IslesQueries whether wind direction, strength and longevity are major factors in shaping our climate over the centuries.Note: Weather comprises the day to day events that we all experience. Climate is officially the trend of the weather (often temperature and rainfall) taken over a continuous thirty year period. The two terms have sometimes been used in an interchangeable manner here, when a period of more than a year is being examined.Some two years ago I wrote this article The Rise and Fall of Central England Temperature. This article commented on the interesting-but not climatically valid-observation that no one born in England this century has known warming; in fact there had been a slight decline in temperatures, albeit still maintained at a historically high level.This data – using Central England Temperature (CET) which is maintained by the Met Office – has now been updated to the end of 2017 as shown in Figure 1. It shows this decline continuing, although recent warm seasons have slightly reduced the downwards trendFigure 1To put this into a much broader context, here is the seasonal data from the start of the CET record in 1660.Figure 2Figure 2a linked here [2a ], shows the seasonal temperatures in much greater detail.The recent cooling was interesting, as it appeared that CET fitted into the pattern of an earlier article I co-authored with Verity Jones In Search of Cooling Trends.This graphic shows some of the stations identified as cooling over the statistically meaningful period of at least 30 yearsFigure 3The take home message was that whilst undoubtedly most stations around the world had warmed in recent decades, it could be observed that there were large warming AND cooling trends in many places. With regards to cooling, some one third of stations worldwide showed a trend that was downwards, rather than upwards. This was confirmed by Richard Muller of the BEST project several years ago in a personal email, but it must be said there are many caveats to this observation, especially as regards the length, amount and consistency of this cooling.In 2016 Professor Muller wrote an article in which he observed the areas of sustained cooling in America;Figure 4He wrote [link]“I attach a plot that shows climate around the US. The blue circles show locations where the trend line has indicated cooling weather over the last 100 years. The red crosses show where it has warmed. The fact that ⅔ of the spots are warming illustrates that global warming is real, although to be careful and scientific we have to avoid the heat island effects (not part of global warming) and average equally over all land and sea. The cooling parts on the map don’t indicate that the world is cooling, but only that local variability in climate is still larger than the global warming trend.”Now neither America nor England constitutes the entire world land surface of course, but both countries have especially good weather records. In Britain’s case, the temperature records go back to 1659, which I reconstructed further back to 1538 in this article from 2011 The Long Slow Thaw.This showed the oscillation of temperatures throughout the period and in particular the depths of cold in the ‘Little Ice Age.’ (The results can be seen in Figure 6, below.)The keepers of the CET records-the UK Met office had recognised that since its inception over 350 years ago, Britain – and more specifically England – had become much more urbanised and accordingly made adjustments to the temperatures in recent decades to compensate. In the ‘Long Slow Thaw’ I wrote this:‘The modern era of CET is potentially showing the effects of needing a uhi adjustment greater than the Met office currently apply. * However, as we had earlier observed that instrumental records should not be considered accurate to tenths of a degree we are perhaps splitting hairs. Consequently, more accurately we should observe that the ‘direction of travel’ of temperatures, when combined and constrained by historic records, shows that at several points from 1538 there are similarities to the modern era as regards warm periods.”*Note; Since 1974 the data have been adjusted by the Met Office to allow for urban warming: currently a correction of -0.2 °C is applied to mean temperatures. The context of this UHI adjustment can be seen in this graphic showing population growth.The Rise and Fall of Central England Temperatures – help needed to find missing dataMost important is the simple fact temperatures have not increased much after the Little Ice age for the past 150 years. NASA finds only 0.8 ‘ C increase. Think about it how can we fear climate change if temperatures are not increasing. Remember we are in an ice age called the Quaternary where the previews climate change was the devastating Little Ice Age.Contrast this graph of China temperatures for 333 years in the end no change but at various decades significant apparent change lost when smoothed out over a longer time frame.Fossil fuels are a gift of nature. They are like a battery of energy created by sunlight several million years ago. They have enabled all the civilised development in the West and will continue to support the growth in prosperity of the developing world. Fossil fuels are not running out. Fracking developments can occur almost anywhere worldwide. For example there are 300 years’ worth of Coal in the UK alone.Nonetheless there is a coming Climate catastropheThat catastrophe is the exact opposite of the “we are all going to fry narrative” of the Climate alarmists. It presages a very scary future for Man-kind and the biosphere in the comparatively near-term:According to reliable Ice Core records the last millennium 1000 – 2000 AD was the coldest of our current Holocene interglacial.The world has already been cooling at ~0.14°C / millennium, ~20 times the earlier rate since before Roman times, in fact since ~1000 BC.Holocene Context for Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global WarmingScreenshot 2019-09-25 at 18.08.58.pngBut as can be seen in the rapid Recovery from the last Ice Age, 10,000 years ago, when temperature increased at a rate of ~+2.5°C / millennium, the world’s Climate can change radically and suddenly.There is every reason to suspect that the World could meet a similar falling temperature cliff at the coming end of our present Holocene epoch, this century, next century or this millennium, similar to the end of the previous Eemian interglacial.Screenshot 2019-10-06 at 10.31.02.pngThe direction of temperatures is far better when the data goes back farther.Looking back over the past 300+ years the data shows a drop in temperatures.Looking back more than 6000 years shows an even stronger decline in temperatures.The cooling today is best seen by observation of snow, ice, rain and low drought.Global snowfall is a strong indicator of cooling and it is rising.This data matches recent experience with 100 year record snowfall around the world.First snow in Morocco for 100 years."The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible."IPCC TAR WG1, Working Group I: The Scientific BasisThus it’s quite curious that the IPCC continues to make future predictions of apocalyptic climate change! Even their conclusion that the recent increases of CO2 and other greenhouse gases are the cause of most of the Earth’s warming in the last half of the 20th century appears unjustified. (Much of the information in the above 11 paragraphs is derived from the very informative reference: http://co2coalition.org/wp-conte...)Stephen Schneider, Stanford Univ. environmentalist -1989 Discover magazine - "That, of course, entails getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have."We must not ignore the reality of a cooling earth.12 New Papers: North Atlantic, Pacific, And Southern Oceans Are Cooling As Glaciers Thicken, Gain MassBy Kenneth Richard on 11. September 2017Graph Source Duchez et al., 2016Contrary to expectations, climate scientists continue to report that large regions of the Earth have not been warming in recent decades.According to Dieng et al. (2017), for example, the global oceans underwent a slowdown, a pause, or even a slight cooling trend during 2003 to 2013. This undermines expectations from climate models which presume the increase in radiative forcing from human CO2 emissions should substantially increase ocean temperatures.The authors indicate that the recent trends in ocean temperatures “may just reflect a 60-year natural cycle“, the AMO (Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation), and not follow radiative forcing trends.Dieng et al., 2017 We investigate the global mean and regional change of sea surface and land surface temperature over 2003–2013, using a large number of different data sets, and compare with changes observed over the past few decades (starting in 1950). … While confirming cooling of eastern tropical Pacific during the last decade as reported in several recent studies, our results show that the reduced rate of change of the 2003–2013 time span is a global phenomenon. GMST short-term trends since 1950 computed over successive 11-year windows with 1-year overlap show important decadal variability that highly correlates with 11-year trends of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation index. The GMST 11-year trend distribution is well fitted by a Gaussian function, confirming an unforced origin related to internal climate variability.climate variability.We evaluate the time derivative of full-depth ocean heat content to determine the planetary energy imbalance with different approaches: in situ measurements, ocean reanalysis and global sea level budget. For 2003–2013, it amounts to 0.5 +/− 0.1 W m−2, 0.68 +/− 0.1 W m−2 and 0.65 +/− 0.1 W m−2, respectively for the three approaches. Although the uncertainty is quite large because of considerable errors in the climate sensitivity parameter, we find no evidence of decrease in net radiative forcing in the recent years, but rather an increase compared to the previous decades.We can note that the correlation between GMST [global mean surface temperature] trends and AMO trends is quite high. It amounts 0.88 over the whole time span. At the beginning of the record, the correlation with PDO trends is also high (equal to 0.8) but breaks down after the mid-1980s. The GMST and AMO trends shown in Figure 6 show a low in the 1960s and high in the 1990s, suggestive of a 60-year oscillation, as reported for the global mean sea level by Chambers et al. (2012). Thus the observed temporal evolution of the GMST [global mean surface temperature] trends may just reflect a 60-year natural cycle driven by the AMO.Subpolar North Atlantic Cooling Rapidly Since 2005According to Piecuch et al. (2017) there has been no net warming of the North Atlantic Ocean in the last quarter century. The warming that occurred in the 10 years from 1994-2004 has been completely negated by an even more pronounced cooling trend since 2005. The predominant (87%) cause of the warming was determined to be of the same natural (non-anthropogenic) origin as the subsequent cooling: advection, the movement/circulation of heat via internal processes. In fact, human CO2 emissions are never mentioned as even contributing to the the 1994-2004 warming.Piecuch et al., 2017 The subpolar North Atlantic (SPNA) is subject to strong decadal variability, with implications for surface climate and its predictability. In 2004–2005, SPNA decadal upper ocean and sea-surface temperature trends reversed from warming during 1994–2004 to cooling over 2005–2015. … Over the last two decades, the SPNA has undergone a pronounced climate shift. Decadal OHC and SST trends reversed sign around 2004–2005, with a strong warming seen during 1994–2004 and marked cooling observed over 2005–2015. These trend reversals were pronounced (> 0.1 °C yr−1 in magnitude) in the northeastern North Atlantic (south and west of Iceland) and in the Labrador Sea. … To identify basic processes controlling SPNA thermal variations, we diagnose the SPNA heat budget using ECCOv4. Changes in the heat content of an oceanic control volume can be caused by convergences and divergences of advective, diffusive, and surface heat fluxes within the control volume. [Advective heat convergence] explains 87% of the total [ocean heat content] variance, the former [warming] showing similar decadal behavior to the latter [cooling], increasing over 1994–2004, and decreasing over 2005–2015. … These results demonstrate that the recent SPNA decadal trend reversal was mostly owing to advective convergences by ocean circulation … decadal variability during 1993–2015 is in largest part related to advection by horizontal gyres.Yeager and Robson (2017) also point out that, like it did from the 1960s to 1980s, the North Atlantic “has again been cooling”, a trend which they and others expect to continue. Sea surface temperatures are no warmer today than they were in the 1950s.Yeager and Robson, 2017 [W]hile the late twentieth century Atlantic was dominated by NAO-driven THC [thermohaline circulation] variability, other mechanisms may dominate in other time periods. … More recently, the SPNA [sub polar North Atlantic] upper ocean has again been cooling, which is also thought to be related to a slowdown in the THC. A continued near-term cooling of the SPNA has been forecast by a number of prediction systems, with implications for pan-Atlantic climate.The Southern Ocean Has Been Cooling Since The 1970s, Contrary To ModelsLatif et al., 2017 The Southern Ocean featured some remarkable changes during the recent decades. For example, large parts of the Southern Ocean, despite rapidly rising atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, depicted a surface cooling since the 1970s, whereas most of the planet has warmed considerably. In contrast, climate models generally simulate Southern Ocean surface warming when driven with observed historical radiative forcing. The mechanisms behind the surface cooling and other prominent changes in the Southern Ocean sector climate during the recent decades, such as expanding sea ice extent, abyssal warming, and CO2 uptake, are still under debate. Observational coverage is sparse, and records are short but rapidly growing, making the Southern Ocean climate system one of the least explored. It is thus difficult to separate current trends from underlying decadal to centennial scale variability.Turney et al., 2017 Occupying about 14% of the world’s surface, the Southern Ocean plays a fundamental role in ocean and atmosphere circulation, carbon cycling and Antarctic ice-sheet dynamics. … As a result of anomalies in the overlying wind, the surrounding waters are strongly influenced by variations in northward Ekman transport of cold fresh subantarctic surface water and anomalous fluxes of sensible and latent heat at the atmosphere–ocean interface. This has produced a cooling trend since 1979.Sea Ice Has Been Expanding For The Entire Southern Hemisphere Since The 1970sComiso et al., 2017 The Antarctic sea ice extent has been slowly increasing contrary to expected trends due to global warming and results from coupled climate models. After a record high extent in 2012 the extent was even higher in 2014 when the magnitude exceeded 20 × 106 km2 for the first time during the satellite era. … [T]he trend in sea ice cover is strongly influenced by the trend in surface temperature [cooling]. … A case study comparing the record high in 2014 with a relatively low ice extent in 2015 also shows strong sensitivity to changes in surface temperature. The results suggest that the positive trend is a consequence of the spatial variability of global trends in surface temperature and that the ability of current climate models to forecast sea ice trend can be improved through better performance in reproducing observed surface temperatures in the Antarctic region.The Pacific Ocean Has Also Been Cooling Since The 1970sLi, 2017 In the Southern Ocean, the increasing trend of the total OHC slowed down and started to decrease from 1980, and it started to increase again after 1995. In the warming context over the whole period [1970-2009], the Pacific was losing heat, especially in the deep water below 1000 m and in the upper layer above 300 m, excluding the surface 20 m layer in which the OHC kept increasing through the time.Glaciers, Ice Sheets Stable, Even Gaining MassGoel et al., 2017 Ice rises are a useful resource to investigate evolution and past climate of the DML coastal region. We investigate Blåskimen Island ice rise, one of the larger isle-type ice rises at the calving front of the intersection of Fimbul and Jelbart Ice Shelves, using geophysical methods. … Using the Input-Output method for a range of parameters and column setups, we conclude that Blåskimen Island has been thickening over the past nine years [2005-2014]. Thickening rates cannot be determined precisely, but ensemble results show that thickening rate averaged over the ice rise varies between 0.07 m a−1 and 0.35 m a−1 [per year]. On longer timescales, we speculate that the summit of Blåskimen Island has been stable within several kilometers at least in the past ∼600 years but no longer than several millennia.Bader et al., 2017 Rather than reflecting major changes in ice flow path over time, the provenance changes are interpreted to indicate relative stability of the East Antarctic ice sheet.Martín-Español et al., 2017 We investigate the mass balance of East Antarctica for 2003–2013 using a Bayesian statistical framework. … We apportion mass trends to SMB and ice dynamics for the EAIS, based on two different assumptions, different remote sensing data and two RCMs. In the first experiment, the model apportions about a third of the mass trend to ice dynamics, +17 Gt/yr, and two thirds, +40 Gt yr−1 to SMB, resulting in a total mass trend for the EAIS [East Antarctic Ice Sheet] of +57 ± 20 Gt yr−1.Bolch et al., 2017 Previous geodetic estimates of mass changes in the Karakoram revealed balanced budgets or a possible slight mass gain since ∼ 2000. Indications of longer-term stability exist but only very few mass budget analyses are available before 2000. Here, based on 1973 Hexagon KH-9, ∼ 2009 ASTER and the SRTM DTM, we show that glaciers in the Hunza River basin (central Karakoram) were on average in balance or showed slight insignificant mass loss within the period ∼ 1973–2009.Predictions Of Future Cooling, Ice ExpansionÅrthun et al., 2017 Statistical regression models show that a significant part of northern climate variability thus can be skillfully predicted up to a decade in advance based on the state of the ocean. Particularly, we predict that Norwegian air temperature will decrease over the coming years, although staying above the long-term (1981–2010) average. Winter Arctic sea ice extent will remain low but with a general increase towards 2020.Pittard et al., 2017 We suggest the Lambert-Amery glacial system will remain stable, or gain ice mass and mitigate a portion of potential future sea level rise over the next 500 years, with a range of +3.6 to -117.5 mm GMSL-equivalent.12 New Papers: North Atlantic, Pacific, And Southern Oceans Are Cooling As Glaciers Thicken, Gain MassScience settled: there is no global warmingScience Settled: There is No Global WarmingObama Global WarmingFEBRUARY 11, 2014 BY ALAN CARUBAI recently received an unsigned email about my Sierra Club commentary in which I pointed out that it opposes traditional forms of energy and made a passing reference to Obama’s lie that “climate change”, the new name for global warming, was now “settled science.”Global warming was never based on real science. It was conjured up using dubious computer models and we were supposed to believe that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change could actually predict what the climate would be twenty, fifty, or a hundred years from now.The writer of the email disagreed with me. “lol you are a f**king idiot. you don’t believe there is global warming going on? you need to let your prejudices go and stop basing your views on what your political stance is…do you research you f**king faggot.”Now, not everyone who believes in global warming is as rude as this individual and certainly not as ignorant, but his message suggests that those who do not believe in it do so as the result of “a political stance” when, in fact, our views are based on science.Anyone familiar with my writings knows that a lot of research is involved. In my case, it dates back to the late 1980s when the global warming hoax began to be embraced by politicians like Al Gore who made millions selling worthless “carbon credits” while warning that “Earth has a fever.”A small army of scientists lined their pockets with government grants to produce data that supported the utterly baseless charge that carbon dioxide was causing the Earth to warm. They castigated other scientists or people like myself as “deniers” while we proffered to call ourselves skeptics. They were joined by most of the media that ignored the real science. And the curriculums in our schools were likewise corrupted with the hoax.Then, about 17 years ago the Earth began to cool. It had nothing to do with carbon dioxide—which the Environmental Protection Agency deems a “pollutant” despite the fact that all life on Earth would die without it—and everything to do with the SUN.A few days after the email arrived, two-thirds of the contiguous U.S.A. was covered by snow. As this is being written, Lake Superior is 92% frozen, setting a new record. As of February 5, the entire Great Lakes system was, according to the Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, 77% covered with ice.On February 1st, NOAA and NASA held a joint press conference in which they released data about 2013’s global surface temperature. They made reference to a “pause” in the temperature that began in 1997. Dr. David Whitehouse, science editor for the BBC, noted that “When asked for an explanation for the ‘pause’ by reporters, Dr. Gavin Schmidt of NASA and Dr. Thomas Karl of NOAA spoke of contributions from volcanoes, pollution, a quiet Sun, and natural variability. In other words, they don’t know.”Both of these government agencies, along with others like the EPA and the Department of the Interior, are staffed by people who understand that their employers are deeply committed to the global warming hoax. One should assume that almost anything they have to say about the “pause” is based entirely on politics, not science.Then, too, despite the many measuring stations from which data is extracted to determine the Earth’s climate, there is a paucity of such stations in COLD places like Siberia. Stations here in the U.S. are often placed in “heat islands” otherwise known as cities. If you put enough of them close to sources of heat, you get thermometer readings that produce, well, heat.People in the U.S., England, Europe and other areas of the world who do not possess Ph.ds in meteorology, climatology, geology, astronomy, and chemistry have begun to suspect that everything they have been told about global warming is false. Between 1300 and 1850 the northern hemisphere went through a mini-ice age. After that it began to warm up again. So, yes, there was global warming, but it was a natural cycle, not something caused by human beings.Nature doesn’t care what we do. It is far more powerful than most of us can comprehend.This brings us back to the Sun which determines, depending on where you are on planet Earth, how warm or cold you feel. The Sun, too, goes through cycles, generally about eleven years long. When it is generating a lot of heat, its surface is filled with sunspots, magnetic storms.When there are few sunspots, solar radiation diminishes and we get cold. Scientists who study the Sun believe it may encounter another “Maunder minimum”, named after astronomer Edward Maunder, in which the last “Little Ice Age”, between 1645 and 1715, occurred. The Thames in England froze over as did the canals of Holland froze solid.There is no global warming and scientists like Henrik Svensmark, the director of the Center for Sun-Climate Research at Denmark’s National Space Institute, believes that “World temperatures may end up a lot cooler than now for 50 years or more.” I agree.– See more at: http://www.tpnn.com/2014/02/11/science-settled-there-is-no-global-warming/#sthash.uAitz355.dpuf