Washington State Patrol Polygraph And Background Investigation: Fill & Download for Free

As I have posted elsewhere to the same general question:A peace officer must be observant, must be willing to make value judgments, must present a professional and confident presence, and must be willing to use force to protect themselves and others. And must effect those behaviors in a lawful manner (or at least an ethical manner, see: "Dirty Hands Dilemma"). Those who are not capable of these behaviors shouldbe eliminated during the recruiting and training process.The person intent on killing an officer does not have a label on his or her forehead warning about such intent. Police are trained to be in a constant state of alert, because the badge, uniform, and patrol car are labels of intent to arrest criminals. The criminal is forewarned, since the uniform represents arrest and incarceration.According to a psychology professor at Rice University, police psychological test evaluations are slanted toward those who are slightly anti-social. Those who are excessively pro-social would have difficulty hunting down suspects, using criminal informants against that informant’s own interests, putting on handcuffs and arresting people.If you have ever watched Animal Planet you would know that there is a hierarchy in social groups. The Alpha Male retains his position through bluff, bluster, and force. The bluff and bluster prevent some violence because those of lesser capability back down in the face of such bluff and bluster. And, there is evidence that "officer friendly" is more likely to be attacked and/or killed than is the officer who is quick to assert authority and control.An immediate show of force can prevent further resistance that could lead to injuries for the officer and the arrestee. And, being an overly friendly cop, who expects the best from people and is reluctant to use force can be hazardous to the safety of that officer and the public. Here are some generalized characteristics of cops who have been killed or assaulted:FBI Research on Officers in Armed Confrontations, From Force Science News provided by The Force Science Research Center (05/09/07):“More often than the officers they (the criminal assailant) attacked, offenders delivered at least some rounds on target in their encounters. Nearly 70% of assailants were successful in that regard with handguns, compared to about 40% of the victim officers, the study found. …Thirty-six of the 50 officers in the study had ‘experienced hazardous situations where they had the legal authority’ to use deadly force ‘but chose not to shoot.’ … ‘It appeared clear that none of these officers were willing to use deadly force against an offender if other options were available,’ the researchers concluded.The offenders were of a different mind-set entirely. … ‘They have been exposed to killing after killing, they fully expect to get killed and they don’t hesitate to shoot anybody, including a police officer.”Along those same lines, an FBI report from 1992 identified traits of the primary victims of felonious killings of law enforcement personnel. They were primarily identified as White males in their mid-30s, college educated, married, with eight years of experience, and assigned to a single officer vehicle. Behaviorally, the officers killed were described as;Friendly and well-liked;Tended to use less force than other officers;Tended to use force at a later point than other officers in confrontations;Tended to use poor tactics, or did not adhere to control procedures (back-up, arrest, etc.);Claimed a superior ability to read suspects and situations;Tended to look for good in people; and,Laid back and easy going.A syllogistic argument on police traits:1) In the general population, some err, some are corrupt, and some are corruptible.Law enforcement personnel are hired from the general population.Conclusion: Some law enforcement personnel err, some are corrupt, and some are corruptible.2) Law enforcement personnel, in order to be hired, are subject to an extensive background investigation, a medical evaluation, educational requirements, and must meet requirements for ability to communicate orally and in writing, and probably be subject to a psychological evaluation, a polygraph test, a written test, and a physical fitness test.The general population is not commonly subject to such requirements.Conclusion: Law enforcement personnel are a “superior” sub-group, assuming those criteria are considered as the criteria for the determination of superior.3) Police are selected based on a prediction as to job performance (through the above described process).The general population is not subjected to such scrutiny.Conclusion: the general population would perform police functions less well than the police population."He who is to be a good and noble guardian of our city will be by nature philosophical and spirited, and quick and strong…. It is the spirited element in their nature that produces the fierceness; well trained it would be bravery, but if it is strained overmuch it will turn into hardness and surliness…. But what is the result of hard gymnastic exercise and good living, with no participation in music and philosophy?… Then such a man, I fancy, becomes a hater of reason, and … no longer uses the persuasiveness of discourse, but accomplishes all his ends by violence and fierceness, like a brute beast, and lives in ignorance and ineptitude."(Plato, Republic, c. 375 BCE)Reference:Uniform Crime Reports Section, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Justice. (1992). Killed in the line of duty: A study of selected felonious killings of law enforcement officers. Washington, DC: Author.

A peace officer must be observant, must be willing to make value judgments, must present a professional and confident presence, and must be willing to use force to protect themselves and others. And must effect those behaviors in a lawful manner (or at least an ethical manner, see: "Dirty Hands Dilemma"). Those who are not capable of these behaviors should be eliminated during the recruiting and training process.The person intent on killing an officer does not have a label on his or her forehead warning about such intent. Police are trained to be in a constant state of alert, because the badge, uniform, and patrol car are labels of intent to arrest criminals. The criminal is forewarned, since the uniform represents arrest and incarceration.According to a psychology professor at Rice University, police psychological test evaluations are slanted toward those who are slightly anti-social. Those who are excessively pro-social would have difficulty hunting down suspects, using criminal informants against that informant’s own interests, putting on handcuffs and arresting people.If you have ever watched Animal Planet (TV channel) you would know that there is a hierarchy in social groups. The Alpha Male retains his position through bluff, bluster, and force. The bluff and bluster prevent some violence because those of lesser capability back down in the face of such bluff and bluster. And, there is evidence that "officer friendly" is more likely to be attacked and/or killed than is the officer who is quick to assert authority and control.An immediate show of force can prevent further resistance that could lead to injuries for the officer and the arrestee. And, being an overly friendly cop, who expects the best from people and is reluctant to use force can be hazardous to the safety of that officer and the public. And: “The officer's own gun was used in 12% of all murders of police officers” (U.S. Department of Justice, 2012). Here are some generalized characteristics of cops who have been killed or assaulted:FBI Research on Officers in Armed Confrontations, From Force Science News provided by The Force Science Research Center (05/09/07):“More often than the officers they (the criminal assailant) attacked, offenders delivered at least some rounds on target in their encounters. Nearly 70% of assailants were successful in that regard with handguns, compared to about 40% of the victim officers, the study found. …Thirty-six of the 50 officers in the study had ‘experienced hazardous situations where they had the legal authority’ to use deadly force ‘but chose not to shoot.’ … ‘It appeared clear that none of these officers were willing to use deadly force against an offender if other options were available,’ the researchers concluded.The offenders were of a different mind-set entirely. … ‘They have been exposed to killing after killing, they fully expect to get killed and they don’t hesitate to shoot anybody, including a police officer.”Along those same lines, an FBI report from 1992 identified traits of the primary victims of felonious killings of law enforcement personnel. They were primarily identified as White males in their mid-30s, college educated, married, with eight years of experience, and assigned to a single officer vehicle. Behaviorally, the officers killed were described as:Friendly and well-liked;Tended to use less force than other officers;Tended to use force at a later point than other officers in confrontations;Tended to use poor tactics, or did not adhere to control procedures (back-up, arrest, etc.);Claimed a superior ability to read suspects and situations;Tended to look for good in people; and,Laid back and easy going.A syllogistic argument on police traits:1) In the general population, some err, some are corrupt, and some are corruptible.Law enforcement personnel are hired from the general population.Conclusion: Some law enforcement personnel err, some are corrupt, and some are corruptible.2) Law enforcement personnel, in order to be hired, are subject to an extensive background investigation, a medical evaluation, educational requirements, and must meet requirements for ability to communicate orally and in writing, and probably be subject to a psychological evaluation, a polygraph test, a written test, and a physical fitness test.The general population is not commonly subject to such requirements.Conclusion: Law enforcement personnel are a “superior” sub-group, assuming those criteria are considered as the criteria for the determination of superior.3) Police are selected based on a prediction as to job performance (through the above described process).The general population is not subjected to such scrutiny.Conclusion: the general population would perform police functions less well than the police population."He who is to be a good and noble guardian of our city will be by nature philosophical and spirited, and quick and strong…. It is the spirited element in their nature that produces the fierceness; well trained it would be bravery, but if it is strained overmuch it will turn into hardness and surliness…. But what is the result of hard gymnastic exercise and good living, with no participation in music and philosophy?… Then such a man, I fancy, becomes a hater of reason, and … no longer uses the persuasiveness of discourse, but accomplishes all his ends by violence and fierceness, like a brute beast, and lives in ignorance and ineptitude."(Plato, Republic, c. 375 BCE)Reference:U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics (2001, March). Policing and Homicide, 1976-98: Justifiable Homicide by Police, Police Officers Murdered by Felons. NCJ 180987. Retrieved from: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/ascii/ph98.txtUniform Crime Reports Section, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Justice. (1992). Killed in the line of duty: A study of selected felonious killings of law enforcement officers. Washington, DC: Author.

As I have posted elsewhere to the same general question:A peace officer must be observant, must be willing to make value judgments, must present a professional and confident presence, and must be willing to use force to protect themselves and others. And must effect those behaviors in a lawful manner (or at least an ethical manner, see: "Dirty Hands Dilemma"). Those who are not capable of these behaviors shouldbe eliminated during the recruiting and training process.The person intent on killing an officer does not have a label on his or her forehead warning about such intent. Police are trained to be in a constant state of alert, because the badge, uniform, and patrol car are labels of intent to arrest criminals. The criminal is forewarned, since the uniform represents arrest and incarceration.According to a psychology professor at Rice University, police psychological test evaluations are slanted toward those who are slightly anti-social. Those who are excessively pro-social would have difficulty hunting down suspects, using criminal informants against that informant’s own interests, putting on handcuffs and arresting people.If you have ever watched Animal Planet you would know that there is a hierarchy in social groups. The Alpha Male retains his position through bluff, bluster, and force. The bluff and bluster prevent some violence because those of lesser capability back down in the face of such bluff and bluster. And, there is evidence that "officer friendly" is more likely to be attacked and/or killed than is the officer who is quick to assert authority and control.An immediate show of force can prevent further resistance that could lead to injuries for the officer and the arrestee. And, being an overly friendly cop, who expects the best from people and is reluctant to use force can be hazardous to the safety of that officer and the public. Here are some generalized characteristics of cops who have been killed or assaulted:FBI Research on Officers in Armed Confrontations, From Force Science News provided by The Force Science Research Center (05/09/07):“More often than the officers they (the criminal assailant) attacked, offenders delivered at least some rounds on target in their encounters. Nearly 70% of assailants were successful in that regard with handguns, compared to about 40% of the victim officers, the study found. …Thirty-six of the 50 officers in the study had ‘experienced hazardous situations where they had the legal authority’ to use deadly force ‘but chose not to shoot.’ … ‘It appeared clear that none of these officers were willing to use deadly force against an offender if other options were available,’ the researchers concluded.The offenders were of a different mind-set entirely. … ‘They have been exposed to killing after killing, they fully expect to get killed and they don’t hesitate to shoot anybody, including a police officer.”Along those same lines, an FBI report from 1992 identified traits of the primary victims of felonious killings of law enforcement personnel. They were primarily identified as White males in their mid-30s, college educated, married, with eight years of experience, and assigned to a single officer vehicle. Behaviorally, the officers killed were described as;Friendly and well-liked;Tended to use less force than other officers;Tended to use force at a later point than other officers in confrontations;Tended to use poor tactics, or did not adhere to control procedures (back-up, arrest, etc.);Claimed a superior ability to read suspects and situations;Tended to look for good in people; and,Laid back and easy going.A syllogistic argument on police traits:1) In the general population, some err, some are corrupt, and some are corruptible.Law enforcement personnel are hired from the general population.Conclusion: Some law enforcement personnel err, some are corrupt, and some are corruptible.2) Law enforcement personnel, in order to be hired, are subject to an extensive background investigation, a medical evaluation, educational requirements, and must meet requirements for ability to communicate orally and in writing, and probably be subject to a psychological evaluation, a polygraph test, a written test, and a physical fitness test.The general population is not commonly subject to such requirements.Conclusion: Law enforcement personnel are a “superior” sub-group, assuming those criteria are considered as the criteria for the determination of superior.3) Police are selected based on a prediction as to job performance (through the above described process).The general population is not subjected to such scrutiny.Conclusion: the general population would perform police functions less well than the police population."He who is to be a good and noble guardian of our city will be by nature philosophical and spirited, and quick and strong…. It is the spirited element in their nature that produces the fierceness; well trained it would be bravery, but if it is strained overmuch it will turn into hardness and surliness…. But what is the result of hard gymnastic exercise and good living, with no participation in music and philosophy?… Then such a man, I fancy, becomes a hater of reason, and … no longer uses the persuasiveness of discourse, but accomplishes all his ends by violence and fierceness, like a brute beast, and lives in ignorance and ineptitude."(Plato, Republic, c. 375 BCE)Reference:Uniform Crime Reports Section, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Justice. (1992). Killed in the line of duty: A study of selected felonious killings of law enforcement officers. Washington, DC: Author.