Islamic Will Template: Fill & Download for Free

No.Islamic societies are experiencing the same drift towards secularization and moral relativism as are Christian, Hindu and Buddhist societies. Modernity, I-Technomania, growing solipsism and scientific curiosity are deleting the feelings of spirituality and mysticism that religions must feed on to survive. Political Islam, and evangelical Christianity seem to be gaining converts mainly in undeveloped countries, whose populations use these religions as templates to quickly modernize.

“Liberals” (or more accurately progressives) have no answers for dealing with radical Islam, because they do not have a template for understanding the problem.They have been playing identity politics for so long that they are now confronted by an ideology that actually does systematically oppress women, practices slavery, executes homosexuals, rejects education, and is founded on what they believe to be the literal word of god. Yet the left occupies itself with apologetics and excuse making because the majority of Muslims are perceived as being non-white.Please stop saying “education.” Given a buffet of intellectual disciplines and scholarship we find time and again that the Islamists are choosing a fundamentalist view of religion en masse. You know the Islamic world has the internet? You know that Islamic migrants to the west have access to everything that every other westerner does? Boko Haram means “Western education is forbidden”, the Taliban will kill people to keep kids out of school, and British school children will travel to Syria to join ISIS.Economics has little to do with it. While ISIS is fighting the Syrian regime, it is more than happy to export terrorists to bring the fight to the west. People join ISIS because they either support the ideology or ISIS will kill them if they don’t. Jobs and poverty are certainly an issue, but it’s not what is driving recruitment.

There is only one rational answer to that question : We simply do not know.Going about this question with an assertive “ no” or a childish “ not even anywhere near “ as an answer is in itself the sign of extreme naïveté and blatant unawareness the European mainstream ideology is suffering from in this current era. That is a clear symptom of intellectual degeneracy. No society should approach an increasingly unstable future with this kind of smug attitude.What needs to be understood here is that this isn´t as much a question of demographics as it is a question of anthropological dynamics.I am an anthropologist. I don't do feelings, I don't do politics and I certainly do not gobble propaganda for breakfast. I deal with human maths. Cold, hard, human behavioral factors and environmental and cultural variables. Copy pasting some opaque graph based on some skewed data from some rose-tinted politically left leaning website and calling it a safe bet for the future when it comes to such a highly complex human puzzle is extremely unwise, biased and is not doing justice to the question.As I tried to explain for another Quoran the other day in Kriztofer Plitzkin's answer to Is being black a liability? statistics do not necessarily depict reality in an accurate fashion. They can give a broad, general view of a problem but to achieve any level of acceptable accuracy in the image it paints, it must be a very simple model with the smallest possible amount of variables and non abstract factors.Human dynamics are multidimensional and history is by definition completely unpredictable as opposed to what the smug bunch of incompetent mollusques leading the charge into a future they repeatedly seem to fail foreseeing - and the hordes of intellectual lemmings that follow them religiously - seem to believe.For such a complex problem as the mass immigration of Middle Easterners and Northern Africans (which we will denote with the very inappropriate term “muslims” for the sake of convenience) of this last couple of years into Europe, some simplistic graphs and talks about whether or not one human group is numerically superior to the other doesn´t do it. It isn´t remotely that simple.In regards to human dynamics, one should never lose sight from the fact that humans aren´t one big family under the sky looking for happiness unless they are being sold the tale. Human dynamics from an anthropological standpoint are about human interests. It has never changed and never will. Human geographical movement (migration) is based on interests. The way human groups interact with one another is based on interests. Again that is unless one is being sold the fairytale that this is otherwise. Human beings and especially human groups, are in competition. Even when they appear very passive, human beings naturally defend their interests and compete with (against) one another.This being said, as of today there are a number of variables that make difficult an accurate prediction of the coming human impact from “muslim immigration” accurately foreseeable. When it comes to the event of mass immigration of “muslims” into Europe, the data is simply too meager to base any kind of prediction on. This event, as far as recorded history can recall, is completely unprecedented though the clash of “ muslim” and European culture is something there are large amounts of historical data to look at but for avoiding the waste of precious time stating the obvious fact that they do not go along too well, this will be skipped.The name of the game is “looking at human group behavioral patterns throughout history.”One of the perks of being an anthropologist is that one versed in the art of human observation acquires the ability to see past most dogmas and eventually becomes a cold blooded killer at scrutinizing human societies without being attached to an ideology. Once human observation is deep enough it becomes objective and all kinds of bias goes straight through the window. As I mentioned earlier, I do not deal in that type of currency. I study and observe human societies, their structure, their history, their culture.The main problem with the way people are taught to perceive history and human behavior is that history is linear when in fact human history is more of a cyclical nature. Human behavior might be altered by external factors but human nature does not change. As far as human nature is concerned there is not much difference between an Ancient Egyptian shoemaker and a modern Norwegian yuppie. What would make them so different in the same room would be their cultural norms which affect their behavioral patterns. A lot of patterns can be observed. And boy, does this not look good on one end of the spectrum.When a civilization has reached a certain point of its development it becomes complacent. Advanced sedentary civilizations do that. They did it over and over again under the course of human history. When advanced sedentary civilizations become complacent they begin declining.Civilizations decline. Once they start declining, there is no stopping it. Decline only gathers momentum and the more time passes, the more the said decline accelerates. Yes, modern Europeans still eat cereals for breakfast and gearing up with a new smartphone each year, people still watch football on gigantic flatscreens, most children go to free public school and Europe is still innovating technologically in many domains, if these are some landmarks of civilization. What I am trying to point at here is that decline and collapse are not the same thing. A civilization can remain somewhat “cutting edge” even when its declining. In more or less most cases, decline is generally a long, gradual process of decay that stretches within different time frames depending on many factors. Spontaneous collapse is generally linked to events of a cataclysmic nature, environmental change or resource and energy scarcity.This being said, societies that are on the decline and even on the verge of what is referred to as societal collapse, are characterized by a number of symptoms, sub-replacement fertility being a primary one, one of the most notably recurrent is irrational belief and another one detachment. A quick look at the current sociocultural trend of Western European societies shows that they are now being driven by empathic altruistic behavior towards other human groups and a rather smug belief that everything is okay and that everything is going to be okay. That is irrational belief and detachment from reality.Empathy and altruism are fine. The only peculiar thing about altruism is that while it’s very noble and in some context vital to human survival on the individual level, it seldom does good on the scale of larger human group interaction, especially in polycultural contexts, as it tends to automatically lead to some form of abuse on one end of the spectrum. Another notable point is that societies that open their fold to larger external human groups are ultimately deeply altered by them, and sometimes they even change their very fabric in a quite radical fashion.Advanced sedentary civilizations are prone to increased vulnerability and when coming in contact with larger nomadic groups, they are ultimately destroyed by them. Either from within or from the outside but they always fall. Nomads always destroy and ultimately outlast advanced sedentary civilizations they come into contact with. Yes, it might vary on the individual level but these people who got into Europe are not like most Europeans. However shocking it might sound, they are not like most Europeans within the societies they were generously welcomed in. These people - just like the ancient nomadic barbarians who sacked advanced sedentary civilizations in their era - are people wired very differently in comparison to their altruistic hosts. Something that makes humans such an interesting and diverse species and also a very successful one out in nature is that given the environmental variables they find themselves in, humans literally develop superpowers. Human psychology changes drastically depending on the environment.Migrants are people equipped with survivor mentality.People who made it through tragedy, chaos, violence and hardship are not simply the trembling innocent lambs they appear to be through the eyes of a welcoming sedentary host, they are also wolves in sheep´s clothing capable of feats of survival and great resilience who given the wrong set of circumstances would give a peace loving, all hugging sedentary host a serious run for his money. To put that simply, your average Syrian migrant mother would be on short odds against the average Swedish soccer mom if they had to use every dirty trick in the book to feed their children.Europeans might consider “muslim” migrants as poorly educated, low skilled, “ignorant”, victims of poverty and whatnot but out there in the real cold world, outside of the bubble of consumerism and IKEA coziness, in the tough, cruel universe the entire human species is entangled, the highest form of intelligence is superior survival IQ. Something indigenous of advanced sedentary societies do not score high points in. Survival is self-preservation and the perpetuation of one’s heritage. At all costs. Survival might cost you your pride, it might cost you your dignity, it might cost you your integrity, it might cost you your morals... The higher the stakes, the higher the cost. But if you truly are wired in a survival mode you will sacrifice some of these things without blinking. For obvious reasons the psychology of survival is not more than an abstract concept to most modern Europeans, entire generations of Western Europeans never had to do anything to survive. Survival also implies deception.Nomadic barbarians are characterized by a strong cultural identity and a well cultivated intra tribal loyalty as opposed to advanced civilized sedentary folks. Subject I slightly touched on in Kriztofer Plitzkin's answer to Is it true that masculinity is becoming extinct in Western Europe? Pattern, anyone ?... European societies do no longer possess such cultural traits to the degree “muslims” generally possess. Intra tribal loyalty is a fearsome drive among human groups who still possess it. Even in its passive forms it tends to still want to push for some form of expansion and larger room to operate. The large majority of “ muslims” even born in European countries still feel stronger loyalty to their communities or even country of origins than they do to their host countries. They tend to possess a cross culture that is not as malleable nor very permeable to European values as many of European values are remote and often contrary to some of their most fundamental templates. They aren´t very easily absorbed groups. This creates a societal unbalance in which the host culture is not looked up to but rather considered inferior and weaker than this of the nomadic barbarian, which in its turn opens the door for all kinds of predatory behavior and aggressive stances against the advanced civilized sedentary socioculture.A thorough observation of nature vs advanced sedentary civilizations shows a solid trend of nature disliking complexity in human societies. Human societies show tendency for a well defined incapacity to sustain a certain level of complexity indefinitely. European societies already show signs of overcomplexity and early signs of societal collapse to which mass immigration is now adding a new level of complexity.What will result out of these factors is nothing that we can predict or confirm with assurance but the trend is rather easily observable. The fact is that this whole paradigm is much more about European societies being caught in the very momentum of a tipping point of history and some almost inevitable friction, the nature of which can´t neither be overlooked and neither be accurately predicted. Human dynamics are not two dimensional drawings on a sheet of paper. Some demographic graphs are far too inadequate to achieve so little as scratching the surface of such complex and layered human puzzles. That is the general principle. All bets are open. Everything goes. Such human equations shouldn´t be approached lightly and without an accute sense of perspective.We simply do not know.Stay Strong