Leadership Transcript: Fill & Download for Free

No, but it’s certainly true that Trump is using these briefings as stunt doubles for the innumerable campaign rallies he’d be having but for the pandemic.Watch one. Trump hogs the podium, alternating between lavishly praising himself (I will never stand for a Republican lecturing me about the importance of personal character again) and saying stuff about the pandemic that Dr. Fauci and others then have to correct.Biden wrote an editorial for the January 27th issue of USA Today in which he predicted how Trump would provide the worst “leadership” possible—and everything Biden warned about then came true.And then to cap it off we have members of Trump’s Cult of Personality talking smack about Biden, parroting the narrative that the Republican Ministry of Propaganda’s smear operation has concocted to try to torpedo Biden.Biden stuttered as a child, and this speech impediment shows even now. And he can be discursive. That is not the same as being a borderline senile narcissist con artist. Biden speaks perfectly cogently. I’ve watched him in various public settings and he handles himself infinitely better than Trump does. Biden is a grown up. Trump is a needy, spoiled, 12 year old boy who spends much of his waking time plotting revenge against his enemies (“enemies” = anyone who doesn’t lick his boots continually as Pence does).If you want to worry about who has the big nuclear button on his desk, read a transcript of Trump being interviewed in the 1980s and being interviewed now. Now he speaks in a kind of word salad, with near-complete disregard for facts but close attention to “truthiness”—telling his cult followers what they want to hear.And now Trump’s blundering, vacillating, near-total lack of leadership during this pandemic is going to kill thousands more Americans that would not have died otherwise.

Yes, we are near the impeachment endgame, but not with the results that many Democrats intend.The Ukraine whistleblower with admitted 2nd hand knowledge of the call, has been discredited by the rapid White House release of the contents of the call memorialized by stenographers (calls between country’s leaders are not recorded). Ukraine’s President Zelensky and his staff confirmed there was no connection to foreign aid and the call. Ukraine Saw 'No Connection' Between U.S. Aid and Trump Request on Biden, Official SaysHere is Constitutional law expert George Washington Law Professor Jonathan Turley’s comments on the transcript. Trump's Ukraine transcript: Unwise words but no proof of a crimeJust prior to the transcript release, Pelosi had announced the start of the House impeachment investigation to placate her very vocal and unhappy far left, including the Squad. After the release of the “transcript” of the call which nullified the whistleblowers claims, she then moved the investigation from the Nadler’s Judiciary Committee to Adam Schiff’s Intelligence Committee. This allows for what we are currently witnessing from Schiff, behind closed door interrogations for national security reasons, while giving Schiff the chance to leak anything that he finds on one more fishing expedition.The problem for the impeachment prone Democrats, is that Schiff has already been discredited by giving us 2 1/2 years of the Trump and Russian collusion leaks to the New York Times and Washington Post with promises that we’d see all the evidence for collusion that he’s seen as committee chairman but just wait for the Mueller Report. When that was a big dud, then it was just wait for the Mueller testimony. When that was an even bigger dud, then Schiff moved to Ukraine.Schiff has already lied about having no connection to this whistleblower when asked. And then his “parody” of his interpretation of the phone conversation with Zelensky despite the transcript release pretty much shows that Schiff is just flailing around once again. Washington Post fact-checker gives Schiff four Pinocchios for whistleblower remark/Adam Schiff is facing backlash for parodying Donald Trump's Ukraine call during a Congressional hearingThis is the last gasp for Democrat’s who want to overturn the 2016 election. That they are doing this so close to the next presidential vote, indicates how weak they view their current top tier candidates in the Democratic Party field.It’s ironic given how much time they’ve had to pick someone and reflects how weak the Democratic Party leadership has been after the numerous Senators and Governors voted out of office under 8 years of Obama. Barack Obama Won The White House, But Democrats Lost The CountryThis current version of Democrats have incessantly investigated the Trump and Russia collusion, Trump obstruction, Stormy Daniels/Avenatti and campaign finance, emoluments, all without the courage of their convictions to vote for a formal impeachment process.The current approval rating for Congress is 20% according to gallup. In contrast, Trump approval climbs to highest level of 2019 amid impeachment inquiryThe legacy of the current Democratic Party House majority led by Pelosi, Nadler and Schiff will be the futile impeachment investigations without a single legislative achievement going into the 2020 election. Good luck selling that to flyover country.Bolstered By Impeachment Inquiry, Trump Campaign And RNC Raise $125 Million

MIT wants to be Assured of One thing:That you have sufficient academic prowess to attend MIT, survive freshman year, do well in a major, and graduate in a timely fashion. Required but insufficient.MIT determines that from your:Complete transcriptMandatory letter of recommendation that accompanies your transcript and is written by your guidance counselor (or head master) that describes you over a several year period as both a student and as a Person.Two letters of recommendation from teachers and one Has to be a humanities teacherAny supplemental letters of recommendation (and if you submit a maker portfolio you should have a supporting supplemental letter of recommendationSAT/ACT score (yours is fine)Two SAT subject test scores (you did not mention them)However, then MIT wants to be assured that you will contribute something useful and worthwhile to the undergraduate community outside of the classroom and that is through your extracurricular activities (in school or in your extended community) that demonstrate: Leadership, Commitment, Passion, Excellent time management, a Warm interpersonal relationship with others in a team-building setting, and Character (read the article, the links and the report): Stu Schmill endorses report on consideration of character in college admissionsAnd you must get several glowing letters of recommendation that substantiate all of that.The admission rate is less than 8% (overall).The B+ is fine, but needs to be supported by everything else, above.All the best.