Magellan Complete Care: Fill & Download for Free

I have a lot actually, i will list them below.1# LawI find his powers interesting and his backstory is one of the best in my opinion.His devil fruit is one of the rarest devil fruit in the world, create a spherical space or "room", in which the user has complete control over the placement and orientation of the objects inside.Law demonstrates his range to be enough to slice through an entire mountain.I think it’s REALLY cool, if you ask me.His backstory.Law lived in Flevance which was also known as the "White City." The city was known for Amber Lead, but the place soon became infected with the Amber Lead poisoning. The city was completely wiped out. Law's parents were killed before his own eyes.His little sister also died. With no hope for survival, Law left Flevance and went to Spider Miles where he met Corazon and Doflamingo.Corazon helped to cure Law. Law loved Corazon and he thought of him as a father. But, it wasn't long before tragedy struck again. Corazon was brutally killed by his own brother and Law was once again left alone.He is also really badass.#2 MihawkWell…what can i say, he’s badass.and thisand he’s also one of the few people to walk out of the war without being hurt or even a scratch.#3 SaboHmm, for this one…i just love how he use his fire, i know ace was a great user too.well, i don’t have much to say about sabo.#4 Bon ClayHe was an Amazing guy.-He tricked the marines so straw hats can escape--he volunteered to help luffy save ace and was the first to help luffy in level 5 when he almost died-he also open the gate for everyone so they can go to marinefordHe tried to stop Magellan knowing how strong he is but he didn’t care about that, he just want luffy to go to marineford and save Ace..#5 KatakuriI like him because he’s different from all the other Luffy has fought. He respect Luffy strength and struggle and fight fair even tho they are pirate and enemy.TBH, i really can choose any of them. they are my top 5, but if i really HAVE to chose, i would probably choose Law.he’s ability(devil fruit) is amazing.

NASA had a tighter budget than it ever had with the Apollo missions completed by the early 1970s.It had to pick their targets carefully, especially with the bulk of its funding in work in getting the new Space Transportation System developed.They didn’t want to lose the once-in-a-century opportunity of the planetary alignment known as the “Grand Tour.” Monies were set aside for Pioneers 10 and 11 in 1972 and later for Voyagers 1 and 2 by 1975.Then more money was allocated for two lander/orbiters in support of making the first soft-landing on Mars with the Viking 1 and 2 missions in 1976.With a lander option probably too risky, NASA decided on two spacecraft. One, with three atmospheric probes for the greatest bang for the buck: Pioneer-Venus 12 in 1978. The second, the Pioneer-Venus Orbiter. A mission to map the planet was discussed but cancelled due to budget cuts.Perhaps NASA felt that any gains with the expected lower costs of STS would allow further space probes to fly by the mid-1980s. They did succeed in reviving the radar-mapping mission by the early 1980s, now named Magellan.Magellan was originally planned to be launched by Space Shuttle on a Centaur-G upper stage from an Orbiter’s payload bay for a six-month trip. But the Challenger disaster also cancelled the Shuttle-Centaur plans out of safety and forced the realignment (or cancellation) of some space probe launches from the Orbiters to expendable rockets.Magellan did fly aboard STS-30, but with a less powerful Inertial Upper Stage. It took over twice as long to get to Venus, but get there it did, and made a spectacular radar map of the planet.With several Mars lander, orbiter and rover missions under their belt, NASA’s attention was put once more to outer planet exploration with Galileo and Cassini-Huygens. Two probes to study the planet Mercury, Mariner 10 in 1973 and then MESSENGER in 2004, both used Venus as a flyby gravity assist to reach the most inner planet, taking some readings.It seems that NASA scientists could never quite make the justification for a Venusian lander when there was so much more low hanging fruit with Mars and the outer planets, and only so much money.There doesn’t seem to be a correlation to any results from the Soviet missions and NASA’s plans, which were concentrated on more attractive planets.This Atlantic article speaks more on the dearth of recent study of Venus.That’s not to say they’ve completely forgotten about Venus.NASA is in collaboration with Roscosmos in a joint Venera mission.NASA is also studying how to re-invent a planetary lander/rover. One concept, the Automaton Rover for Extreme Environments (AREE) is a gigantic 1.5 meter tall parallelgram-shaped rover that uses a dominantly mechanical design over electronics that would easily fry or fracture.(The conceptual rendering of AREE, effectively a “steampunk”-inspired Venusian rover. NASA illustration)

Quite often they hired other people to do the calculations for them. As another respondent in this thread pointed out, the word for people who did that job was "computer." It was a low-paid, low-prestige, menial job, and as you might suspect it was usually done by people from that great pool of underpaid labor, women. They did tedious calculations, most often for elite astronomers who needed them done but didn’t want to spend their own time doing them. That job category ceased to exist in the second half of the twentieth century, when it was made unnecessary by the advent of the electronic computer.Human "computers" were the subject of two very good books that I can wholeheartedly recommend: (1) When Computers Were Human, by David Alan Grier, and (2) Miss Leavitt's Stars: The Untold Story of the Woman Who Discovered How to Measure the Universe, by George Johnson.The latter book is about Henrietta Swan Leavitt, who in 1912 was working as a computer at the Harvard College Observatory at very low wages—25 cents an hour—when she made a discovery that was of immense importance to astronomy and cosmology: the key to measuring vast distances in intergalactic space. She had to overcome the indifference of her boss, astronomer Charles Pickering, before the significance of her discovery could be recognized.Henrietta Leavitt had been hired by the Harvard Observatory to do numerical calculations of the brightness of stars in astronomical photographs. But she went beyond the call of duty and began to think about what the numbers she was recording meant. She was much more familiar with the numbers than the astronomers she was working for were, so she noticed patterns that the professional astronomers had overlooked.As she was measuring the brightness of stars, among them were some that vary in brightness, the Cepheid variables, and some vary in a highly regular way. She would eventually discover more than two thousand four hundred variable stars.She carefully measured and recorded how much time it took each one to make a complete cycle of going from bright to dim and back to bright again. By doing so she discovered that there was a mathematical relationship between the stars’ brightness and the length of their brightness cycles. Because she was comparing stars in the same galaxy, the Smaller Magellanic Cloud, it could be assumed that they were approximately the same distance from Earth. Knowing that gave her a way to measure not only the stars’ relative brightness, but their intrinsic brightness, which in turn for the first time provided a way to calculate how far away the galaxies and stars are that lay beyond the rather confined limits of the parallax methods.So Henrietta Leavitt gave astronomers a way to measure vast distances of intergallactic space beyond the Milky Way, out to as far as the Virgo cluster. You would think that the importance of her discovery for astronomy and cosmology would mean that she would be recognized as one of the great heroes of modern science, but because of her job status as a lowly “computer,” she still doesn’t get nearly the recognition she deserves.