Mooring Agreement Sample: Fill & Download for Free

I don’t think that’s quite true. It appears that way sometimes, but I suggest that appearance may be a consequence of sampling bias.Remember, Quora’s architecture is an exercise in bias reinforcement - the site supplies suggestions based on expressed preferences. ‘Quora’ is a neologistic plural for ‘quorum’ - a group required for a consensus to be reached.This little gem of a social media platform just helps make spaces where ‘people like us’ can agree on things. That doesn’t make such agreement false or unwarranted, but we need to realise what’s emerging from our behaviour here - we are being categorised.Anyway, attacks on the Old Testament are just easier. The cultural context is more foreign, the available evidence is more sparse and degraded. All these things are just functions of time. The further we go back into the past the easier it is to make various arguments from ignorance. I could insult your great-great…great-grandmother with relative impunity because you probably don’t know who she is. Similarly, one can say all sorts of things about the Old Testament the same way I (as an Australian) can spew hellfire against America’s gun-madness. No, I don’t understand and I’m not part of that context so yes, there may be good reasons for some positions and no, I can’t see them.Rule number one of warfare is ‘know your enemy’. The problem with this is that the more you know of your enemy the greater the risk that you may understand them. This is why it is always better to bomb from a distance than plunge a knife into the heart while looking your opponent in the eye. Most arguments against the Old Testament run along the lines of ‘a tribal god invented to support a national cult that became the justification for various acts of ‘defensive’ violence which established the worldview of a certain people over their neighbors’. Hey! I can think of a modern equivalent - America’s ‘Freedom’.I will never get sick of pointing out the irony of anthropomorphising freedom. True freedom cannot be contained by any conceptualisation of it, and does not actually ‘reign’ over anything - that would be a restriction of freedom to a dominant role. Isn’t freedom free to not reign?Now, I’m being deliberately inflammatory here - picking on the USA out of general ignorance. However, that’s the driving force in most arguments against Christianity - a sense of ‘unfairness’ and ‘oppression’. Literally ‘the desire to either be an equal opponent and establish a stalemate or destroy the antagonist’. This can be summarised as ‘it’s all wrong because there’s no god of me’. I imagine if such a god did turn up in any vulnerable form we would probably condemn it as a criminal and execute it.Of course, the heart of Christianity is not the Old Testament, though. Christianity stands or falls on the resurrection. Attack that and more injury will be inflicted than exposing Exodus. Attacking the Old Testament is like firing on obsolete hardware. It may bear the flag but it’s no longer part of the front. Hit Christianity where it hurts - attack Jesus. Kill him and Christianity dies. Of course, he never existed and was invented to justify more horrors, right? Hmmm…projection is potent.Again, perhaps not the truth. However, my point is merely ‘one will see what they are looking for’. There are people who accept this and people who deny it. I am definitely waiting in hope for the revelation of Christ. I’ll find out if I’m wrong.PS: In case I have been too subtle, I am ‘attacking America’ here in the same way that one might attack the Old Testament - by creating a representation that oversimplifies a case such that I can dismiss it. In short, a Strawman.

Yes. Yes it is.‘Censorship’ is a word that can be invoked every time someone feels their view is not getting the acceptance it deserves. ‘Freedom of speech’ is often used as the justification for saying stupid and damaging things. Indeed, people are free to say those things - and other people are free to remove that graffiti just like a city’s oppressive totalitarian regime can clean obscene and obnoxious tags off the windows of buses.Remember, Quora is all about censorship. Answers get collapsed and moved all the time. People can even change the original question completely! Hence, your complainant really has no grounds. They signed a terms of service agreement that means Quora (and to some extent Quora users) can do whatever they want with content on this site.I have protested about my comments being deleted before, but not because of the deletion - rather the way what was deleted was selected in order to change the appearance of my argument - like voice-sampling a politician and playing back what is preferred (after blocking to prevent reply). Just don’t do that. That’s dirty.In summary, your opponent can say what they like. In their own answer. Your comments section is your lawn. Deal with trespassers as you choose within the law of the land.Desecration of free speech

Noting that there are, in technical fact, several hundred candidates running for office across both parties[1] , the lack of serious Republican challengers to President Trump is because it is extraordinarily rare for sitting presidents to be challenged by other members of their party.Whenever a sitting president has faced a serious primary challenge, it has never resulted in the president losing their position as the party’s standard-bearer[2] , but that president has then always (small sample size warning!) gone on to lose the general election[3][4][5] .As such, there’s no incentive for the party in the White House to support a primary challenger (because history suggests that they’ll then lose the White House), and no personal incentive for a politician to fight both president and party[6] (Ronald Reagan’s persistence[7] [8] being a notable exception).So the fact that Governor Bill Weld has opted to pick this fight (and possibly Governor Larry Hogan has as well[9] [10] ) probably has more to do to with reasons of personal integrity (or future ambition) rather than actual expectation of winning in 2020[11] .But as for the large field Democrats, it’s because:The party out of the White House usually fields lots of candidates at the outset;The Democratic National Committee’s central leadership still hasn’t healed[12] from the massive backlash the organization faced from its efforts to clear the field for Hillary Clinton’s candidacy in 2016[13][14] , and so has been wary of being seen as limiting the number of candidates; and,The Democratic Party has multiple factions[15] from which prospective candidates may draw a significant core of support. On this point, you might consider the current phase of the primary to be among candidates trying to be the standard bearer for one (or several) of those factions before turning their attention to the Party as a whole.But keep in mind that, at their peak, the Republicans had 12 viable candidates in the 2012[16] primaries and 17 in 2016[17] . Some number dropped out before the first votes were cast, and then candidates dropped like flies after Iowa and New Hampshire. It’s likely to be the same with Democrats this year.Footnotes[1] Carter Moore's answer to How many people are now running for president in the Democratic party, and do you think they are shooting themselves in the foot with such a number?[2] Carter Moore's answer to Has an incumbent president ever lost in a primary election?[3] Carter Moore's answer to Could a sitting U.S President be challenged in their party's primary in a reelection?[4] Carter Moore's answer to If former MA Gov. Bill Weld challenges Donald Trump in GOP presidential primaries, will it doom Trump in the general election?[5] Presidents' Prior Experience[6] Why Republicans Fear Challenging Trump in 2020[7] 1976 Republican Party presidential primaries - Wikipedia[8] 1980 Republican Party presidential primaries - Wikipedia[9] Maryland's Governor Larry Hogan is 'concerned about the Republican Party,' won't rule out a primary challenge to Trump in 2020[10] Larry Hogan rips RNC for shielding Trump from primary challenge[11] Bill Weld’s Presidential Run: Finally, a Republican Tells the Truth About Trump[12] Democratic National Committee’s Chief Executive Quits[13] Clinton Campaign Had Additional Signed Agreement With DNC In 2015[14] 2016 Democratic National Committee email leak - Wikipedia[15] The Six Wings Of The Democratic Party[16] 2012 Republican Party presidential primaries - Wikipedia[17] 2016 Republican Party presidential primaries - Wikipedia