Account Number Of Guaranteed Party: Fill & Download for Free

Police will typically get a warrant, if they believe your email contains evidence.There is specific case law regarding email stored on a third party server not having a reasonable expectation of privacy if it is over a certain number of days old.That means an ISP.Google occasionally gets search warrants served on it for GMail accounts. If properly served, not over broad, made in writing, and signed by an official of the requesting agency, they comply.So does every other ISP out there.So yes, police can, if they need to, sift through your email, and your ISP will helpfully “rat you out”.If you care, run your own mail server, and implement strong encryption; this can be expensive, but it keeps the email under your control, and requires an affirmative act on your part — assuming you don’t do something silly, like use a fingerprint or facial recognition unlock — meaning you cannot be forced to open the mailbox, without some form of guarantee of transactional immunity.Even then — as demonstrated by the Democrats in the last election — you’ll want someone competent at computer security administering things, and you’ll want to train your people to not stupidly open phishing emails.

Time has come to make provision for a Negative vote too. We already have a Positive vote and a Zero vote (NOTA).Is Rahul Gandhi going to pay from some Swiss accounts?No. He will pay from the taxes collected from you and me. For which we toil hard. Be ready to work extra so that Rahul Gandhi can fulfil his dream of becoming PM of India.Rahul Gandhi wants about 25 crore people in India to just relax and earn ₹ 72,000 per year without doing anything. He is just trying to create 25 crore parasites.So, you and me will have to work more and sacrifice more, so that 25 crore parasites can just sleep at home and wake up to get ready-made food. Only because they voted for Rahul Gandhi.And, for this Rahul Gandhi deserves a NEGATIVE vote in elections. Not just vote positive vote to his opponent.It is the Congress party which has created the freebie culture. Now, this culture of “getting money for doing nothing” is being taken to a new level. A new pedestal.Previously, there was at least a “drama” of doing some work, a drama of creating some “asset” to pay the so-called wages, which were basically freebies.Now, no need even to do anything. Just relax at your home and get money from Government.Just stop whatever small work you are doing. Just ensure that your name figures in the so-called 20% poor of India.Voila!!! You are entitled to get money now for doing nothing. NOTHING as in vacuum.Let India go to hell. Who bothers for India if one’s political party can win by giving such bribes to the voters.It has been mentioned in the media that ₹ 360,000 crore would be needed every year to distribute this free money to 20% poor by Rahul Gandhi, who wants to become the new PM of India. Okay. Let me accept this figure for the time being.What else could have been done with this money?Firstly, just modify the mechanism of the scheme proposed. Instead of giving ₹ 72,000 every year free, this money can create employment for 5 crore people every year for ₹ 6000 per month. Get constructive work done from 5 crore people for 365 days of the year, and pay them salary of ₹ 72,000 per year, instead of paying them for doing nothing and thereby diminishing the productivity of India.So, look at how much employment can be generated in a respectable way!The cost of construction of a two-lane flexible pavement road (bituminous pavement) of width about 7 meter would be about ₹ 1 crore per km. So, with ₹ 360,000 crore, you can build 360,000 km roads every year! Yes, it is every year!!And, substantial part of this money would still go ultimately to poor persons who would work on road construction, or work in industries which supply construction materials.So, Mr. Rahul Gandhi, you can create 360,000 km roads EVERY YEAR with this much money, and yet a substantial part of this money will go to poor. But, in a respectable manner, while creating assets for the nation.Just to put the things in correct perspective, till 2015-16, India had about 100,000 km of national highways, 176,000 km of state highways, and about 560,000 km of district roads. I am not mentioning the rural roads which are much more in length, because a two-lane flexible pavement road (bituminous pavement) of width about 7 meter will be equivalent to at least a district road!!!So, in 5 years of Rahul rule, India can have 3 times more roads with this much money, with employment for a large number of people.Okay. Presuming that in about ₹ 500 per month fee, a child can be given reasonably good school education (one of my close relatives is running a school in a big town giving good English medium school education at less than this fee), it will cost ₹ 6000 per year. With ₹ 360,000 crore per year, you can give good quality school education to 60 crore children every year!!! Give education tokens.Are you listening, Mr. Rahul Gandhi? And, of course, it will also lead to employment to a large number of people, directly or indirectly, while making children properly educated and smart.In the 2019 budget, ₹ 61,398 crore budgetary allocation was made for the health sector, with ₹ 6,400 crore earmarked for the centre's ambitious "Ayushman Bharat" scheme, which is highly publicized as a game-changer programme. Look at the impact, that this scheme is creating with only this much budget!Come on, Mr Gandhi. You could have made about 6 TIMES more provision for health with your ₹ 360,000 crore funds. And, for Ayushman Bharat, the increase could have been about 56 TIMES!!!And, this would also have provided employment to people, in addition to providing good health.The cost of our successful Mars mission (Mangalyaan) was only ₹ 450 crore.The cost of 36 Rafale fighter jets is about ₹ 59,000 crore. So, every year (yes every year), we could have purchased / manufactured 216 Rafale jets with your money! Means 1080 Rafale fighter plane in 5 years of your government with the money that you want to put in the drain!!!Can you imagine what it would have meant? The kind of restraint that it would have created on Pakistan and China? The number of lives that would have been saved due to reduction in terrorism?I can go on and on.The fact remains that I have no issue with spending ₹ 360,000 crore per year. But, spend it on some constructive things. Roads, health, education, industries, agriculture, irrigation. Any type of constructive work. Do not use this money to create 25 crore beggars in India.Don’t use this money (which belongs to us, we the people, and comes from us) to buy votes for your party. This is just bribery. And, dacoity too.To reply to the second part of your question, whether this much money is achievable, let me tell you that total revenue collection of Government of India as per 2018 budget was about ₹ 24 lakh crore. And, total expenditure was about ₹ 29 lakh crore. So, we are already spending more than the revenue. If you want to spend ₹ 3.6 lakh crore extra every year, then you have to squeeze some other expenditure. Or, you may have to tax us more.So, either you increase taxes by about 15%. I am being simplistic.Or, you decrease existing expenditure accordingly. What expenditure will you decrease? On defence? On education? On health? Because you cannot touch salaries and pension which take away a large part of expenditure by government.Or, will you decrease the existing subsidies or completely abolish all subsidies to replace them with this new freebie scheme for 20% poor? Remember, that may not be possible for you because existing subsidies go a much wider section of the society. For example, food subsidies are given to about 66% of the population (this was started by your mother, Mr. Rahul Gandhi). So, if you give all this money to 20% poor, where from you will pay to the remaining people for various types of subsidies?In essence, the proposed scheme of Rahul Gandhi is a disaster for India. From any angle you consider it.Worst of all, it will further solidify the position of India as a country of beggars.If you can get free money, why will you work?So, another competition may start to declare oneself poor.It will be mostly the middle class who would be paying to Rahul Gandhi so that he can buy votes from poor.The only saving grace is that Rahul Gandhi’s party is not likely to win 2019 elections despite this bribe of ₹ 360,000 crore every year to 20% of voters!!!To come back to what I said in the beginning, if a new system of Negative vote is introduced, I will cast my Negative vote against Congress, for trying to destroy whatever is left of India.There is already a race to destroy India – in one way or the other. And, it appears the competition is becoming more and more intense. Politicians do not want to see India prosper. They just want their votes. So that they could then loot India for 5 years.So, my Negative Vote goes to Rahul Gandhi.

Because I do love this country and am glad it was designed in such a way that people running for office don’t just have to visit New York, Boston, San Francisco, Detroit, Dallas, and the rest of the 10 most populous cities in the country and call that a win. You want a better representation? See the map below. The blue areas are half the country, by population. These 146 counties have half of the total US population, while the rest are spread out over 3000 other counties, parishes, and districts.Frankly, those little blue areas should not have the right to completely determine the fate of everyone else. Pure democracy isn’t the best system, not in the slightest. I like the analogy that democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what’s for dinner. In the United States, a perfect democracy would have San Francisco and New York City getting free healthcare and a minimum living allowance because they voted for people in Wyoming to pay for it. I love my fellow Americans, but I don’t trust all of you, especially seeing how people like me have been treated for the last decade. This election showed us that the vast majority of people live in completely bubble of self-reaffirming biases that are not in touch with reality. Veterans, one of the only demographic of Americans who have all done some service to the country, are now stereotyped as dangerous, worthless, immoral, and psychologically unstable when nearly every study done on the veteran mindset proved the opposite. Christians are mocked, despised, and stereotyped, having been almostly completely shut out from the cultural conversation. White people are somehow now the cause of every problem that has ever existed, all exist in a state of privilege and supremacy to anyone else, while paradoxically having by far the largest number of deeply impoverished people in the country. Those poor whites, however, are completely invisible to the public discussion taking place in wealthy urban centers and universities populated by middle class white kids. Then you have huge sections of the country being considered simple “fly over”.You see, I live in the middle of that big red area, where we have a very sparse population, but deserve to matter. The electoral system guarantees that only a very slight statistical majority of people who live in very populated areas, don’t constantly overwhelm the the needs and wishes of the millions who don’t live there. Now, who would invent such a system? Large landed farmers of the late 18th century, who live in regions that are very thinly populated, but who should have a say in the matter of who runs the country and that their needs are accounted for in the future decisions of the nation. These were Conservative initiatives of the time, and they favored the numerical minority against populus agendas of the time.And thank God they did, because now we live in a country where you can’t have a large number of people in this country who are dissatisfied with the direction the country is going. You also have to get out and reach out to every small town, perhaps not in person, but speak to their needs. You also have to reach out to every demographic, and not just your select voting block, and you have to try to solve the nation’s problems, and not just your constituents.Trump did a better job of this than Clinton. Clinton sat back and assumed that her educated white women would vote for her, and not enough showed up. She assumed that the black vote would vote for her, and not enough did. She assumed that Mexicans would support her, when far more than what she hoped felt that you should have to come to the nation legally… as they did. She thought that painting Trump as islamophobic would… I have no idea what the goal of that was because there are legitimately a lot of people who don’t want to see a Berlin Christmas Massacre or one of the numerous Islamic based terror attacks we see in Europe happen here. So I have absolutely no idea how she can try to recruit a million people while emboldening millions against her. That was just stupid and showed how disconnected she was with the needs and fears of the majority of the American people. Basically, she assumed that painting an election on racism and sexism would win her the most important seat in the world by focusing on helping only smaller and smaller minorities in what has been called a new era of “civil rights” initiatives. When there are so many millions of people who completely feel attacked for simply being white, who don’t feel the “privilege” of their skin color, particularly when the number of poor whites triples the number of poor blacks in the United States, they really don’t see a positive future in a party that speaks about redistribution and white guilt. Frankly, Clinton tried to win a race by only solving a very, very few people’s problems, and mostly at the expense of a very, very large number of people and those (in the majority) who feel fine about that, vote “Sure, I like being nice”, without take account of the fact that this is not a winning strategy for a nation. You can’t cannibalize successful parts of the nation to feed less successful parts when that won’t even solve the problems of the weaker in society.Trump’s solutions at least were attempts to solve problems and it didn’t matter if you were black or white, brown or what your gender was. People need jobs. People need a safety net of opportunity, not government reliance. People need hope and not to feel like a villain in every story about anyone. His ideas may fail, all presidents have some that do, but he at least gave people a vision of an America where everyone can prosper, at least a little more than they have been.That’s how you win an election and I am much happier that I live in a country where you at least have to pretend to think like that than the alternative.