Structure Of Study Leave: Fill & Download for Free

Unfortunately, there's lot of difference between officers of IMA & OTA.In addition to the inherent difference in duration of training (12 & 18 month) and type of commission (PC & SSC), there are following difference while in service -:Restrictions for foreign assignments.No pension after termination of service(10/14 years)No medical facility post retirement.No study leave for officer released after 10 years of service.Lowest priority for resettlement .Rjfesettlement course (if allotted) after completion of service unlike others.Loss of seniority upon grant of permanent commission.Restriction from appearing in promotional exam( Staff ).Restrictions on grant of PC ( only 1\4 of course).Although both officer's perform same kind of job but wont gets the same competition, its more hard for a SSC officer to prove its mettle and lead the race than a PC officer.

The overwhelming majority of the scientific community is not that well acquainted with space travel or astronomy. They're busy looking at bacteria that live under the Antarctic ice cap, or studying the kinship structures of Amazon basin tribes, or trying to get an extra percent of efficiency out of solar cells.People who are familiar with it would be unlikely to say impossible, just extremely difficult, astronomically expensive, and probably not worth doing.Personally, I suspect that by the time we have the resources to leave the solar system, we will no longer be human, as we currently understand that term.

Let me answer your question in three parts. The first, point out the mistake in your question; and the second, tell you a similar example in the history. Thirdly, brief talk about the merits and demerits, some changes resulting from technology and costs of an alternative.But now I think in this information era, the medium we use to convey the information is not that important. What matters is who are speaking a certain language. Just as any language is changing and the trend is determined by the educated usage, the dominant language in this world is also changing by the same token. Centuries ago most educated people should learn Latin, but I think you won’t be surprised to see such a question today: Is Latin still relevant in today's world? A question about the then most popular language which is more similar to English in any way than to Chinese.1. Education in ChinaYour statement (for the original question) that the students in China are not outstanding in math, science and etc. compared to students in the West may cannot hold water. Here are the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 and 2012 ranking lists:​PISA is an authoritative study by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (PISA - OECD) every three years. As you can see, areas or countries such as Shanghai, Taiwan and Japan all keep their own traditional ideographic characters which, as you said, leave students short-sighted, stunt in ares such as logic and reasoning.2. Let me illustrate this issue using Japan's effortsThe tour of Iwakura Embassy in Europe largely broadened the horizon of Japanese, and at the same time, made them to realize that China, the country they once worshiped, was poor and backward, especially compared to the U.K. and the U.S. Hence its language was inferior compared to the phonographic script used in Western countries. They began to research on language reform. What's more, China lost the Jiawu war in 1894, which completely changed Japan's attitude towards China, and consequently, Chinese/Kanji.In order for Japan to avoid a hopeless future like China’s, many educators and politicians quickened the pace of the reform. Two different Romaji, created by themselves, namely Hepburn Romaji and Kunreishiki Romaji appeared. Some even wanted to use English instead. To push forward the use of Romaji, the United States signed a bill to popularize the it after it took over Japan on 1945.So, there was nothing more to be done to popularize the Romaji in Japan. But as you can see, Romaji has not replaced Kanji and Japanese Kana. Japan usually only use Romaji to name the companies such as Mitsuibishi and Toshiba in English newspapers.And Taiwan, when it was a colony of Japan, established an organization named T.R.K. to popularize Taiwan Romazi.3. Merits and demerits and some changesIt's difficult to decide which is better than which, because there are some merits and demerits to both types of writing. Logograms are not difficult to write anymore because of the Chinese input method in computer, and there are so many software tools. And as an English learner who knows all the 26 English letters, I don't think that the vocabulary is a breeze at all.As for the differences of the thinking and reasoning, based on different languages, there are tons of studies done by linguistics saying that the structure of language may determine the structure of habitual thought in a society, but it doesn't imply that which is inferior and which is superior.Costs of an alternativeAt the very least, let's assume that the current logograms used in China is not the "optimal design" from the perspective of the theory of evolutionary trend of language. If anything, the transformation from a logographic writing system to a phonetic one, or any other forms, is very, very costly.First of all, the loss, otherwise, including the transitional culture may result in a culture crisis. Last week, I came across two mothers with their children. I learned that they came back from a school of Chinese studies (国学班) for The Book of Changes (易经), a book written by authors including Confucius thousands of years ago. They told me that Chinese wisdom becomes more and more important for them. Secondly, because of the serious imbalance of economic and educational development in that vast land, such a big change may get pretty hairy. It's a totally different situation in South Korea. By way of example, Chairman Mao is the only figure on almost all Chinese paper currency. Rather than a political concern, it's an education/literacy matter. Many people from remote places know only Chairman Mao, and some even still don't know who the current Chairman is. The larger and more diverse the country is, the harder and more costly the change will be. Last, but not least, economically, the investment for foreign language learning has been very large, and stopping the use of Hanzi requires a large amont of investment, which directly or indirectly goes into the pocket of Western countries. Normally, as I know, the popularity of a language is positively correlated to the impact in the world, or essencially the economy of the countries speaking it. China has become the second largest economy power in the world and has beening expanding Chinese in the world in the form of openning and running Confucius Institutes.I learned that there are some technical reasons Hanja disappeared in Korean but some 3000 Kanji still remain in Japanese. The interested ones can find the reason here: Why was korea able to remove kanji but japan wasn't when both languages use homophones?Chinese will be changing, just like any other languages; more specifically it will be more and more symbolized, but it will never be abandoned, at least when there are still Chinese in this planet who are proud and confident.