Amends Senate Bill No. 509. Amends Senate Bill No. 509: Fill & Download for Free

The Bradley Amendment has nothing to do with alimony.In United States law, the Bradley Amendment (Public law 99-509 42 U.S.C. § 666(a)(9)(c)) states requirements of statutorily prescribed procedures to improve effectiveness of child support enforcement. It is named after Senator Bill Bradley, who introduced i

Both parties of both houses of congress have already been working on that prevention, thank our lucky Stars and Trump being an obstinate old “Wangdoodle”.“Congress seeks new ways to prevent shutdowns from happening.”"As the country recovers from the longest government shutdown in United States history, Democratic and Republican lawmakers alike are saying they don't want a shutdown to happen again.Some are even pushing legislative proposals aimed at preventing the gears of government from grinding to a halt in the future.The record-breaking shutdown came to an end last week when President Donald Trump signed a spending bill to temporarily reopen government while congressional negotiators attempt to find a deal on border security. But the government could shut down again as early as mid-February when the stopgap funding bill is set to expire.It's not yet clear if lawmakers can come to an agreement to avert a shutdown in a few weeks, but there is bipartisan agreement in Congress that government shutdowns shouldn't just keep happening.And lawmakers in both the House and Senate are taking the opportunity to push proposals that -- if they were ever to be enacted -- could stave off future shutdowns or create more incentives for Congress and the White House to steer clear of them.”==============================================================Why would they all suddenly be so motivated towards one cooperative goal?==============================================================Because if a national leader can create that kind of instrument to supersede the powers of congress for this one purpose, what’s to stop him from trying the same thing to usurp their constitutional powers for any other purpose?In history it’s not an unknown event for a person to dissolve the branch of the public’s representatives and thus make themselves “Emperor” by default. In fact just such a thing brought down the Roman Empire.The following is a bit voluminous I admit, but if you read through it all you’ll find some really shocking similarities to what we have right here in America, right now. You’ll also see what happens “next” if people don’t get busy and do something about it.This is what “failure” will look like, for us as well:Roman Senate - Wikipedia"The Roman Senate (Latin: Senātus Rōmānus) was a political institution in ancient Rome. It was one of the most enduring institutions in Roman history, being established in the first days of the city of Rome, (traditionally founded in 753 BC).It survived the overthrow of the kings in 509 BC, the fall of the Roman Republic in the 1st century BC, the division of the Roman Empire in 395 AD, the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 AD, and the barbarian rule of Rome in the 5th, 6th, and 7th centuries.""(Julius) Caesar's Role in the Collapse of the Roman Republic”"Caesar was part of the era of Roman history known as the Republican Period, but by his day, a few memorable leaders, not restricted to one class or another, had taken control, defying custom and law, making a mockery of the Republican political institutions.One of these leaders was his uncle by marriage, ​Marius, a man who had not come from the aristocracy but was still wealthy enough to have married into Caesar's ancient, pedigreed, yet impoverished family. (...)(...) Caesar didn't just survive, he prospered. He gained power by making alliances with powerful men. He curried favor with the people through his generosity. With his soldiers, he demonstrated generosity as well, and perhaps more importantly, he showed bravery, excellent leadership skills, and a good bit of luck.He added Gaul (what is now roughly the country of France, part of Germany, Belgium, parts of the Netherlands, western Switzerland and northwestern Italy) to Rome's empire.Originally Rome had been asked for help because intruding Germans, or what the Romans called Germans, were hassling some of the tribes of Gaul that were counted as defense-worthy allies of Rome. Rome under Caesar went in to straighten out their allies' mess, but they stayed even after this was done.Tribes like those under the famous Celtic chieftain Vercingetorix tried to resist, but Caesar prevailed: Vercingetorix was led as a captive to Rome, a visible sign of Caesar's military successes.Caesar's troops were devoted to him. He probably could have become king, without too much trouble, but he resisted. Even so, the conspirators' stated rationale for his assassination was that he wanted to become king."Here's how totally out of control things can get when that is allowed to happen: Assassination of Julius Caesar - Wikipedia"The assassination of Caesar was the result of a conspiracy by many Roman senators led by Gaius Cassius Longinus, Decimus Junius Brutus Albinus, and Marcus Junius Brutus.[1][2]They stabbed Caesar (23 times) to death in a location adjacent to the Theatre of Pompey on the Ides of March 15 March 44 BC. Caesar was the Dictator of the Roman Republic, having recently been declared dictator perpetuo by the Senate of the Roman Republic.This declaration made many senators fear that Caesar wanted to overthrow the Senate in favor of totalitarianism, as well as the fear that Caesar’s pro plebeian manifesto would endanger them financially.The conspirators were unable to restore the Roman Republic, and the ramifications of the assassination led to the Liberators' civil war and ultimately to the Principate period of the Roman Empire."“How Rome Destroyed Its Own Republic”"Augustus told Romans he was the only one who could save Rome. And they believed him."Imagine a world in which political norms have broken down. Senators use bad faith arguments to block the government from getting anything done. An autocrat rigs elections and gives himself complete control over the government. Even stranger, many voters subscribe to the autocrat’s personality cult and agree that he should have absolute control.Welcome to Rome in the first century B.C.E. The republic that had existed for over 400 years had finally hit a crisis it couldn’t overcome. Rome itself wouldn’t fall for another 1,500 years. But during this period, it lost its republic forever.The man who played the biggest role in disrupting Rome’s republic was Augustus Caesar, who made himself the first emperor of Rome in 27 B.C.E. By that point, the republic’s political norms had been breaking down for about a century, and Augustus was in a position to take advantage of that. (...)(...) Political violence increased in the 80s B.C.E., when political factions started stealing people’s land and killing their enemies. In 44, senators murdered Augustus’ great-uncle Julius Caesar after he unconstitutionally named himself dictator for life.Non-violent political dysfunction increased during this time, too. During the 60s B.C.E., a senator named Cato the Younger had constantly and unnecessarily used procedural delays to block the senate from voting on legislation he did not like for years. Other senators went along with this because they considered Cato a moral leader.In 59 B.C.E., one of the consuls working with Cato even tried to shut down all public business for the entire year by declaring each day of the year a religious holiday. (In the Roman Republic, saying the gods were angry was an acceptable reason to declare a holiday and postpone voting.)So why didn’t anyone step in to punish these politicians for their antics? “If you believe your republic will last forever, then doing things like not holding a vote on something essential for three years—you don’t see the problem in that, necessarily,” Watts suggests.As Rome grew, it periodically amended its republic to keep it functioning. However, by the time of Cato the Younger, the republic had functioned so well for so long that a lot of people took its ability to survive for granted. And by the time Augustus took power, most people didn’t remember a time before political violence, land theft and government dysfunction were the norm.In other words, a lot of Romans were okay with Augustus assuming supreme control as long as he kept the peace—never mind that he had actually contributed to the violence and property thefts he now claimed only he could fix. Five years into his rule, Augustus bragged: “I freed all people from the fear and danger they experienced using my own funds.”In addition to Augustus’ position as emperor, he also served as one of two consuls. The position of consul was technically the highest elected office in Rome, but under Augustus the elections weren’t free and he “won” every year. Free Roman men could still vote for other elected officials (as opposed to free women and slaves, who couldn’t vote), but there was a catch.“No one really could run if [Augustus] didn’t approve of them,” Watts says. “So it wasn’t possible really to run as a candidate who opposed Augustus.”Rome’s republic collapsed with Augustus, but it didn’t take the Roman Empire with it. After 500 years of (limited) democracy, the Roman Empire survived as a dictatorship for the next 1,500 years."“All hail the Emperor!” — If our congress let’s Trump continue on taking away their powers & controls, they could all lose their jobs; that’s “Why”…

2001 U.S. federal budget[edit]Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (1st): Pub.L. 106–275 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (2nd): Pub.L. 106–282 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (3rd): Pub.L. 106–306 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (4th): Pub.L. 106–344 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (5th): Pub.L. 106–358 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (6th): Pub.L. 106–359 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (7th): Pub.L. 106–381 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (8th): Pub.L. 106–388 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (9th): Pub.L. 106–389 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (10th): Pub.L. 106–401 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (11th): Pub.L. 106–403 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (12th): Pub.L. 106–416 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (13th): Pub.L. 106–426 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (14th): Pub.L. 106–427 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (15th): Pub.L. 106–428 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (16th): Pub.L. 106–520 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (17th): Pub.L. 106–537 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (18th): Pub.L. 106–539 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (19th): Pub.L. 106–540 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (20th): Pub.L. 106–542 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2001 (21st): Pub.L. 106–543 (text) (pdf)2002 U.S. federal budget[edit]Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2002 (8th): Pub.L. 107–97 (text) (pdf)2003 U.S. federal budget[edit]Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2003 (1st): Pub.L. 107–229 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2003 (2nd): Pub.L. 107–235 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2003 (3rd): Pub.L. 107–240 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2003 (4th): Pub.L. 107–244 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2003 (5th): Pub.L. 107–294 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2003 (6th): Pub.L. 108–2 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2003 (7th): Pub.L. 108–4 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2003 (8th): Pub.L. 108–5 (text) (pdf)2007 U.S. federal budget[edit]Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (1st): Division B of Pub.L. 109–289 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (2nd): Pub.L. 109–369 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (3rd): Pub.L. 109–383 (text) (pdf)Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007: Pub.L. 110–5 (text) (pdf)2008 U.S. federal budget[edit]Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2008 (1st): Pub.L. 110–92 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2008 (2nd): Division B of Pub.L. 110–116 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2008 (3rd): Pub.L. 110–137 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2008 (4th): Pub.L. 110–149 (text) (pdf)2009 U.S. federal budget[edit]Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2009 (1st): Division A of Pub.L. 110–329 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2009 (2nd): Pub.L. 111–6 (text) (pdf)2010 U.S. federal budget[edit]Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2010 (1st): Division B of Pub.L. 111–68 (text) (pdf)Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2010 (2nd): Division B of Pub.L. 111–88 (text) (pdf)2011 U.S. federal budget[edit]Beginning in September 2010, Congress passed a series of continuing resolutions to fund the government.[17]1st Continuing Resolution, funding from October 1, 2010 through December 3, 2010, passed on September 29, 2010. (Pub.L. 111-242)2nd Continuing Resolution, funding through December 18, 2010, passed on December 2, 2010. (Pub.L. 111–290 (text) (pdf))[18]3rd Continuing Resolution, funding through December 21, 2010, passed on December 17, 2010. (Pub.L. 111–317 (text) (pdf))4th Continuing Resolution, funding through March 4, 2011, passed on December 21, 2010. (Pub.L. 111–322 (text) (pdf))[19]5th Continuing Resolution ("Further Continuing Appropriations Amendments, 2011"), funding through March 18, 2011, passed on March 2, 2011. (Pub.L. 112-4) This resolution cut $4 billion from 2010 spending levels.[20]6th Continuing Resolution ("Additional Continuing Appropriations Amendments, 2011"), funding through April 8, 2011, passed on March 16, 2011. (Pub.L. 112-6) This resolution cut an additional $6 billion from 2010 spending levels.[21]7th Continuing Resolution ("Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Amendments, 2011"), funding through April 15, 2011, passed on April 9, 2011. (Pub.L. 112-8) This continuing resolution followed a deal on the full annual budget which was made with just hours remaining before a government shutdown.[22] It itself contains an additional $2 billion in cuts.[23] Democrats had previously rejected a Republican-backed resolution passed by the House before the deal, which would have funded the government for another week and cut an additional $12 billion from 2010 levels.[24]2013 U.S. federal budget[edit]The government began fiscal year 2013 operating under the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2013 (Pub.L.112–175 (text) (pdf)), which provided funding through March 27, 2013. It was signed by President Obama on September 28, 2012.[25] Spending through the end of fiscal year 2013 is authorized by the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, signed into law by President Obama on March 26, 2013.[26]2014 U.S. federal budget[edit]Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2014 (H.J.Res 59) (H.J.Res. 59) - a proposed continuing resolution that failed final passage, leading to the United States federal government shutdown of 2013October 2013 mini-continuing resolutions - continuing resolutions proposed during the 2013 federal government shutdown that would have funded small portions of the governmentContinuing Appropriations Act, 2014 (Pub.L. 113–46 (text) (pdf);H.R. 2775) - continuing resolution that ended the federal government shutdown and appropriated funds through January 15, 2014[27]Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 - appropriated funds through January 18, 2014.[15]Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (H.R. 3547; 113th Congress) - proposed, as of January 16, 20142015 U.S. federal budget[edit]Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2015 - a continuing resolution that would fund the federal government of the United States through December 11, 2014 at an annualized rate of $1 trillion.[28] On September 17, 2014, the House voted in Roll Call Vote 509 to pass the bill 319-108.[28] On September 18, 2014, the United States Senate voted in Roll Call Vote 270 to pass the bill 78-22.[29]2016 U.S. federal budget[edit]Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2016 - a continuing resolution that would fund the federal government of the United States through December 11, 2015 at an annualized rate of $1.02 trillion.[30][31]2017 U.S. federal budget[edit]Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2017 (Pub.L. 114–223 (text) (pdf)) - a continuing resolution that would fund the federal government of the United States through December 9, 2016 at 0.496% below the operating rate of the FY 2016 enacted appropriation. On September 28, 2016, the Senate voted 72-26 to pass the bill and later that day, the House voted 342-85 to pass the bill.[32][33] The President signed the bill on September 29, 2016.[34] The bill also included full-year funding for Military Construction and Veterans Affairs and emergency funding for Zika virus response and preparedness.[35]2018 U.S. federal budget[edit]Division D of Continuing Appropriations Act, 2018 and Supplemental Appropriations for Disaster Relief Requirements Act, 2017 (Pub.L. 115–56 (text) (pdf)), extending temporary funding until December 8, 2017.Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2018 (Pub.L. 115–90 (text) (pdf)), extending temporary funding through December 22, 2017Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2018 (Pub.L. 115–96 (text) (pdf)), extending temporary funding through January 19, 2018.Further Extension of Continuing Appropriations Act, 2018 (enacted as Subdivision 3 of Division B of Honoring Hometown Heroes Act, H.R. 1892), extending temporary funding through March 23, 2018.