Rfp) Document For Selection Of An Event: Fill & Download for Free

Hi! This is a very good question. RFPs and the whole request for proposal process are obligatory to select a strategic IT partner, especially if you’re going to engage with them for more than one project.First, my advice will be reading our article“How to Write An RFP and RFP Template for Software Development”As a custom software development company we are working with the dozens of RFPs each month, Existek has performed the study of how someone should approach writing the request. Also, there you may download the 19 page RFP template document with recommendations and guidelines designed especially for software development project.Here is the list of contents of this article:* What an RFP is, how it is used and why it is important* Who should write an RFP* RFP format for software development projects* What should be in an RFP for software development projects* Letter of InterestBelow will be some extractions from this material that I found to be suitable for your case considering that you’re selecting the partner for multiple long strategic engagements.RFP FORMAT FOR SOFTWARE PROJECTSWhen we talk about the RFP for a software project, some specific questions should be there. A common mistake is that custom software development is sometimes treated like a purchase instead of a service. In fact, this will be day-after-day work and collaboration between external and internal teams. If you don’t have either the expertise or the time to control the process by yourself, many providers offer a full-cycle development service. Your task here is to get information about whether the potential provider has already delivered similar services to somebody else.This is not about getting and comparing bids. Rather, it’s about getting as much information about the software development company as possible. Engage with the providers and find out which of them is the most responsive in terms of communication and which of them shares your values.Provider’s Background InformationMost RFP templates for software include a section in which you tell the vendors about your company, your business mission and the challenge they must solve for you. That’s certainly good; it gives them context, which helps the software company evaluate your project. But is that going to help you evaluate the vendor?A request for proposal in software development should also include obligatory questions about the vendor’s background, not just standard “present yourself as a company and why you fit this project.” This is too vague and you’re likely to get replies that are impossible to compare side by side. Or you’ll receive the standard marketing text which all of them have prepared for such cases. This shows that they have branding and marketing teams, which is nice, but that’s not on the agenda. Here are few questions that will help you determine whether the vendor will be able to deliver what’s promised.How long have you been in business?What’s your management structure?Which industries and business verticals do you work with?What’s your client retention rate and the number of projects per client?How many employees do you have and how many employees did you have a year ago?What is the total number of projects you have completed in the past three years?Relevant ProjectsThe provider with experience in similar projects and industries will always be one of the cheapest – though not necessarily on paper or in the software development RFP. The total cost of engagement might be precisely calculated after project completion or product release. It includes the time the in-house team spent on collaboration with the service provider, time and budget overrun, post-launch support, QA, etc.The company that has relevant experience will be good at two things: making precise estimations and delivering according to those estimations. This company already knows the best practices and challenges related to the industry or technology. Also, it usually has some developments and shortcuts prior to project launch. All this makes such a company the perfect executor of similar software development projects in the future.To learn more about previous projects, you can ask the following questions:What was the size of a similar project on which you worked, including the size of the team, the duration and the outcome?Do you have client references for that project?Was this project successful and completed on time and within the budget? Why or why not?Human Resource ManagementHappy people tend to produce more value. That’s an axiom. Any project can have flaws in planning, management, technology, etc. Poorly motivated employees can dramatically increase the impact of those issues. On the other hand, a company that actually cares about its employees is likely to more easily overcome challenges. Following are questions you should include in the RFP template to get a basic understanding of the situation.What’s your employee retention rate?Do you have professional growth programs?What’s your hiring strategy?Are your employees involved in publications, events and blogs/articles?

Hi! This is a very good question. RFPs and the whole request for proposal process are obligatory to select a strategic IT partner, especially if you’re going to engage with them for more than one project.First, my advice will be reading our article“How to Write An RFP and RFP Template for Software Development”As a custom software development company we are working with the dozens of RFPs each month, Existek has performed the study of how someone should approach writing the request. Also, there you may download the 19 page RFP template document with recommendations and guidelines designed especially for software development project.Here is the list of contents of this article:* What an RFP is, how it is used and why it is important* Who should write an RFP* RFP format for software development projects* What should be in an RFP for software development projects* Letter of InterestBelow will be some extractions from this material that I found to be suitable for your case considering that you’re selecting the partner for multiple long strategic engagements.RFP FORMAT FOR SOFTWARE PROJECTSWhen we talk about the RFP for a software project, some specific questions should be there. A common mistake is that custom software development is sometimes treated like a purchase instead of a service. In fact, this will be day-after-day work and collaboration between external and internal teams. If you don’t have either the expertise or the time to control the process by yourself, many providers offer a full-cycle development service. Your task here is to get information about whether the potential provider has already delivered similar services to somebody else.This is not about getting and comparing bids. Rather, it’s about getting as much information about the software development company as possible. Engage with the providers and find out which of them is the most responsive in terms of communication and which of them shares your values.Provider’s Background InformationMost RFP templates for software include a section in which you tell the vendors about your company, your business mission and the challenge they must solve for you. That’s certainly good; it gives them context, which helps the software company evaluate your project. But is that going to help you evaluate the vendor?A request for proposal in software development should also include obligatory questions about the vendor’s background, not just standard “present yourself as a company and why you fit this project.” This is too vague and you’re likely to get replies that are impossible to compare side by side. Or you’ll receive the standard marketing text which all of them have prepared for such cases. This shows that they have branding and marketing teams, which is nice, but that’s not on the agenda. Here are few questions that will help you determine whether the vendor will be able to deliver what’s promised.How long have you been in business?What’s your management structure?Which industries and business verticals do you work with?What’s your client retention rate and the number of projects per client?How many employees do you have and how many employees did you have a year ago?What is the total number of projects you have completed in the past three years?Relevant ProjectsThe provider with experience in similar projects and industries will always be one of the cheapest – though not necessarily on paper or in the software development RFP. The total cost of engagement might be precisely calculated after project completion or product release. It includes the time the in-house team spent on collaboration with the service provider, time and budget overrun, post-launch support, QA, etc.The company that has relevant experience will be good at two things: making precise estimations and delivering according to those estimations. This company already knows the best practices and challenges related to the industry or technology. Also, it usually has some developments and shortcuts prior to project launch. All this makes such a company the perfect executor of similar software development projects in the future.To learn more about previous projects, you can ask the following questions:What was the size of a similar project on which you worked, including the size of the team, the duration and the outcome?Do you have client references for that project?Was this project successful and completed on time and within the budget? Why or why not?Human Resource ManagementHappy people tend to produce more value. That’s an axiom. Any project can have flaws in planning, management, technology, etc. Poorly motivated employees can dramatically increase the impact of those issues. On the other hand, a company that actually cares about its employees is likely to more easily overcome challenges. Following are questions you should include in the RFP template to get a basic understanding of the situation.What’s your employee retention rate?Do you have professional growth programs?What’s your hiring strategy?Are your employees involved in publications, events and blogs/articles?

I am going to start off by 1st posting a list of U.S. military missile projects before I compare them to Russia’s own missile projects, because I am 110% sure that 99.9% of Quora users that are deemed as chauvinists from the U.S. are even aware that these projects exist themselves because they are too focused on announcements from Putin to sadly care about what the U.S. is even making.U.S. Missile ProjectsBefore I start we are sadly going to put an X mark for the HCSW US Air Force kills one of its hypersonic weapons programs because its cancelled.TBGTactical Boost Glide“Systems that operate at hypersonic speeds—five times the speed of sound (Mach 5) and beyond—offer the potential for military operations from longer ranges with shorter response times and enhanced effectiveness compared to current military systems. Such systems could provide significant payoff for future U.S. offensive strike operations, particularly as adversaries’ capabilities advance.The Tactical Boost Glide (TBG) program is a joint DARPA/U.S. Air Force (USAF) effort that aims to develop and demonstrate technologies to enable future air-launched, tactical-range hypersonic boost glide systems. In a boost glide system, a rocket accelerates its payload to high speeds. The payload then separates from the rocket and glides unpowered to its destination.”The weapon seems to offers maneuverability as well. I do not know the exact speed or range but it will be mach 5 or above.Operational FiresDARPA Awards Lockheed Martin Hypersonic OpFires Phase 3 Contract“ORLANDO, Fla., Jan. 15, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) awarded Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) a $31.9 million contract for the Operational Fires (OpFires) Phase 3 Weapon System Integration program. OpFires seeks to develop and demonstrate an innovative ground-launched system to enable a hypersonic boost glide missile system to penetrate modern enemy air defenses and rapidly engage time-sensitive targets.Lockheed Martin, DARPA and the U.S. Army, aims to develop and demonstrate an innovative, ground-launched, mobile, integrated weapon system that leverages DARPA-funded propulsion solutions and hypersonic boost glide technology. The award for Phase 3 of the OpFires program will take the design from the initial requirements development through the Critical Design Review (CDR) in late 2021. Integrated flight testing is scheduled to begin in 2022, with component and subsystem tests expected in 2021."The OpFires missile is critical to providing the U.S. Army with a highly maneuverable and rapid response solution capable of operating from unpredictable land-launch positions to suppress hostile threats," said Hady Mourad, director of Tactical and Strike Missiles Advanced Programs at Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control. "Lockheed Martin will deliver the prototype missiles utilizing the experienced production teams that currently produce the ATACMS, GMLRS and PAC-3 missile systems in Camden, Arkansas."Not much known about it either, but it will definitely have a longer range than a SRBM and can be launched by a TEL which are usually used by air defense systems.ARRWLockheed Martin awarded $998 million hypersonic ARRW missile contract“The rocket-boosted ARRW is one of two air-launched hypersonic missiles publicly known to be undergoing testing by the Pentagon, which considers the project necessary step to maintain an edge over near-peer competitors China and Russia, which have invested significantly in hypersonic weapons technology.Hypersonic missiles and vehicles travel faster than Mach-5 (about 6,170 km/h) and are intended to outrace and outmaneuver existing missile and air defense systems.”A hyper-sonic missile with maneuvering capabilitiesLRHWLockheed Martin's Expertise in Hypersonic Flight Wins New Army Work“The Army LRHW prototype will leverage the C-HGB and introduce a new class of ultrafast and maneuverable long-range missles with the ability to launch from ground mobile platforms. The LRHW system prototype will provide residual combat capability to soldiers by 2023.Hypersonic strike weapons, capable of flying speeds in excess of Mach 5, are a key aspect of the long-range precision fire modernization effort for the Army and the national security strategy to compete with and outpace potential threats.”IR-CPSLockheed Martin Wins $846M US Navy IRCPS Weapon System modification Contract“Work is expected to be completed by Jan. 1, 2024, the United States department of Defense said in a statement Wednesday.This procurement provides for the design, development, build and integration of large diameter rocket motors, associated missile body flight articles, and related support equipment for Navy IRCPS flight test demonstrations.”HSWabThe HAWC missile project is now considered as HSWab. So far its the only Scramjet missile project being done as far as I know.U.S. Unknown Missile ProjectRGPWSMDA taps industry to build interceptor to defend against hypersonic threats“WASHINGTON — The U.S. Missile Defense Agency is tapping industry to design and build an interceptor capable of defending against regional hypersonic weapons threats, releasing a draft request for proposals to build prototypes.The request directs industry to submit whitepapers by March 19 to build a Hypersonic Defense Regional Glide Phase Weapons System interceptor, with plans to select at least one prime contractor to build a prototype that would culminate in a flight test, according to the draft RFP with an updated issue date of Jan. 30 and posted to sam.gov, the federal government’s contact opportunities website.The agency notes that negotiations following review of whitepapers and oral presentations could result in no awards, one or multiple.By building a flight test vehicle under the program, MDA hopes to better understand the technical utility of such a regional hypersonic defensive system and “will provide a pathway to subsequent tactical interceptor and fire control capability,” the document states.”Sources To Watchout For Regarding Some of These ProjectsThere is some confusion that I have found out on the web just to inform other people here and this might probably destroy these websites credibility so here we go.USAF B-52 in carry test of hypersonic ARRW missileHCSW although it was cancelled was not an air-breathable engine.The First U.S. Hypersonic Weapons: Arrow and HacksawThis source claimed mach 20 for quite a small missile. I was going to let it slide here and post the source but when it was referencing to be 4 times faster than the Kinzhal than that is basically saying mach 40 to mach 48 so in the trash bin this source goes.Russia’s Missile ProjectsKinzhalKh-47M2 Kinzhal (“Dagger”)“It has a claimed range of more than 2,000 km, a speed of more than Mach 10, and an ability to perform evasive maneuvers at every stage of flight carrying both conventional and nuclear warheads”Since everyone likes to compare the Kinzhal to the Iskander, I only see one comparison however the speeds and ranges of them both are different.Оперативно-тактический ракетный комплекс 9К720 'Искандер'“The 9M723 missile is a solid fuel, single-stage missile with a warhead inseparable in flight. The missile is controlled along the entire flight path using aerodynamic and gas-dynamic rudders. The 9M723 flight path is not ballistic, but controllable. The rocket is constantly changing the plane of the trajectory. It is especially active in maneuvering in the area of ​​its acceleration and approach to the target - with an overload of 20 to 30g.In order to intercept the 9M723 missile, the anti-missile must move along the trajectory with an overload two to three times higher, and this is almost impossible. Most of the flight path of a rocket manufactured using the Stealth technology and having a small reflecting surface passes at an altitude of 50 km, which also significantly reduces the likelihood of its destruction by the enemy.Russian Iskander-M Missile System: Credible Deterrent“Following a relatively flat trajectory, the missile never leaves the atmosphere as it. False targets and small jammers separate from the rocket upon approaching the target. Iskander-M carries a complex of electronic warfare jamming devices, both passive and active, for the suppression of the enemy's radar. As such, the missile is extremely difficult to intercept with current missile defense technologies.”Kinzhal and Iskander perform maneuvers throughout their entire flight paths. Gas-dynamic is just a similar fancy term called, “thrust vectoring.” This means that every stage the missile is in the directions keep changing. This makes it a difficult target to intercept because guidance systems keep getting thrown off.Stealth technology with small reflecting surfaces and the usage of small fins.The Iskander does not leave the atmosphere because of a flat trajectory, which might suggest the same for the Kinzhal giving it a low altitude flight ceiling.The Iskander uses EW devices to suppress radars trying to track and intercept the missile.ZirconThese are way more difficult missiles to intercept than your average boost glide vehicles. If I was to compare it to the Kinzhal it could have those features offered as well but with 3 more additional points added.Lower altitudes with better ability to deal with air density and drag, which makes it a more difficult target to track for ground radars using radar horizon, or satellite systems trying to track it.1st stage brings it to its flight ceiling, but unlike ballistic missiles where no additional stages are given once they reach their flight ceilings, scramjet missiles use their 2nd stage engines throughout their entire flights meaning they have no slowdowns compared to ballistic missiles.Lower altitudes and high speeds create plasma density conditions favorable for stealth making the missile a difficult target to track.They were the 1st country to field a scramjet missile known as the kholod project which French and U.S. took part in collecting the data of the experiment. Russians have been fielding air-breathable missiles for quite a long time and have made alot of significant improvements such as if you were to look at the Brahmos-NG, Igla Scramjet models, and their Mak 2019 airshow demonstration, they have downsized their missiles, while we have left to see how far the U.S. has gone in this field of missile technology.Russian developers to increase the speed of Zircon Missile over 10 machTheir developers are trying to make the missile reach mach 10, and altitudes of the missiles flight ceiling have been listed at 40kms. So lets see how temperatures and altitudes effect radio waves.Aerospaceweb.org | Atmospheric Properties CalculatorPut mach 10 for velocity, 32 degrees Fahrenheit for temperature increment and 40kms for altitude. Than the 2nd section will tell you that the total temperature for the heat shield is 5630.6759 Kelvin. And such plasma density can effect radio waves all in the fire control range. Such is the intent of why speeds for the Zircon missile for each tests keep on increasing and increasing.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19670020821.pdfAs we can also see around 40kms or 130,000ft according to this graph the RCS conditions are favorable for the aluminum sphere being dropped going from -12 to -25 decibels. The effects of frequency wavelength for the RCS of spheres does not apply which is why they are usually used for test objects for radars most of the time. But material of an object is also import regarding RCS because one object of a similar size compared to the other might have a higher RCS because of more radio reflection.Also the Zircon missile stays cruising at 40km altitudes, it does not drop like the sphere which the plasma conditions are always favorable for the missile. Russia’s physicists have also found a way to still communicate with objects in a high density plasma condition like re-entry vehicles.Russian Physicists Solve Radio Black-Out Problem for Re-Entering SpacecraftAvangardRussia's Avangard hypersonic missile system has entered service“Tracing its origins back to US President Ronald Reagan's 'Star Wars' space-based laser missile defence concept, the Avangard is based around a radically advanced Scramjet engine design, which enables the system to deliver both nuclear and conventional payloads at speeds of up to Mach 20.Capable of manoeuvring while in flight, the system is essentially invulnerable to any existing or prospective missile defence system. This makes it an important element of Russia's strategic deterrent, guaranteeing a Russian response in the event of aggression against the country.”I am not trying to add insult to injury by show a failed project that could not reach 1/3rd of its entire flight because of heat stress, but I just wanted to show that there are some similarities between the HTV-2 and Avangard. And that is one rides on top of the Minotaur 4 ICBM and the other rides on top of a R-36M2 and once they reach a 100km+ altitude in the launch phase they are released. My current problem is when either the HTV-2 or Avangard is compared to MIRV where I have a slight disagreement because of this.MIRV gets released on re-entry. If you were to look at the flight ceiling of an ICBM they are usually around 1000kms, than after that the MIRVs will separate. But the HTV-2 and Avangard get released about 1/10th of the way before traveling 1000s of kms and to me this quite a significant difference.BurevestnikI would not compare this missile to Project Pluto, because Project Pluto never flew it they only tested the engines. And the engines of Project Pluto were transported by train rails while Burevestnik the entire missile with the engine is transported by a wheeled cart throughout their laboratory with images displayed out in the web. Some call this a nuclear 3rd strike weapon because of its possibility to travel for days, weeks and supposedly months. There are many examples that show how advanced Russia is in harnessing nuclear energy but that will be beyond the topic discussing missiles. Also this missile is to be supported with artificial intelligence utilizing a low altitude cruise profile to avoid air defense systems.Russia’s Unknown Missile ProjectsMini-KinzhalSource: 23/05/2014 Itar-Tass“A new modified aircraft missile for Russian fifth-generation fighters would be developed by 2016, the director-general of the Tactical Missiles Corporation, Boris Obnosov, said on Friday at the Kadex 2014 exhibition of weapons and military equipment in Astana, Kazakhstan."We have established close contact with the Sukhoi design office. A permanent working group is formed. All the protocols of informational cooperation are agreed on. Models are made according to schedule. Everything must be done by 2016," Obnosov said, noting it was a new modified aircraft cruise missile X-74M2.It was hard work. Intensity of tests was very high. Even the main test centre coped with it with difficulty, he added.The Tactical Missiles Corporation also planned to develop the first model of a hypersonic missile by 2020, the corporation's director-general said.”Su-57 jets will be equipped with hypersonic missiles similar to Kinzhal — source"In accordance with Russia's State Armament Program for 2018-2027, Su-57 jet fighters will be equipped with hypersonic missiles. The jet fighters will receive missiles with characteristics similar to that of the Kinzhal missiles, but with inter-body placement and smaller size," the source said.”I am assuming that this would be a scramjet design because air-breathable missiles from the old to the present have significantly reduced their sizes compared to ballistic missiles. And it seems they have plans for fitting them inside the SU-57 so that stealth can be utilized to avoid nearby sources before launching them giving air defenses a less reaction time if it was a regular aircraft carrying it instead.IFRK DPОдним Махом: Россия разрабатывает оружие против гиперзвуковых ракет“ An ordinary anti-aircraft missile has one warhead,” he told Izvestia. - The probability of a miss on a hypersonic maneuvering target is very high. But if one ammunition carries several homing shells, then the chances of hitting a high-speed object increase significantly.According to the expert, in the case of firing IFRK DP at hypersonic targets, all warheads will be displayed at a pre-calculated point on the trajectory of a flying munition and attack it in the forehead. The use of ultra-long-range missiles will expand the area of destruction of the interceptor.Especially effective is the use of the complex during aircraft operations as part of a single information space. Aerial targets, cruise or hypersonic missiles can be detected by ground-based radars, early warning radars, or an attack warning system. The fighter will only need to launch an ultra-long-range missile in the desired area. At the same time, the interceptor will not have to risk it himself, entering into an air battle."There is a good reason why I put a honey bee nest to represent this unknown missile. This ultra-long range air to air missile is to have a range of several hundred kms being carried by the Mig-41. The K-77Ms are said to be candidates of being attached to this missile and their ranges included are like 193kms. To me this is like throwing a hornet’s nest at the aerial target, but instead of angry wasps you get several medium range air to air missiles coming at you.ConclusionThe U.S. and Russia have a bunch of other missile projects like EMP emitting missiles like CHAMP and Alabuga. Missiles that use A.I., etc. But I do not have enough information to know the flight ceilings, maneuverability capabilities, some speeds, ranges, special features like EW, etc to make a decision who has better missiles based on these projects. But I hope this broadens people’s perspectives of what is going on in missile technology.